Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edited by
Anukool Vaishnav
Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology,
GLA University, Mathura, India
Swiss Excellence Fellow, Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope
(Reckenholz), Zürich, Switzerland
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from
the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found
at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may
be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our
understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any
information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be
mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any
injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or
operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: 978-0-323-85579-2
v
vi Contents
Role of ISR..........................................................................................................248
Induction of ISR...................................................................................................249
Applications of ISR in oil seed crops..................................................................250
Conclusions...............................................................................................................251
References.................................................................................................................252
CHAPTER 13 Biostimulants for improving nutritional quality in
legumes...................................................................................................... 261
Prerana Parihar, Purnima Singh, and Jagdish Kumar Patidar
Introduction...............................................................................................................261
Definitions.................................................................................................................261
Main category of biostimulants................................................................................264
Humic substances (HS)........................................................................................264
Protein hydrolysate (PHs) and amino acid formulations (AA)............................264
Plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPR)...............................................266
Seaweed extract....................................................................................................266
Effect of biostimulants on nutrient quality of legumes.............................................268
Application of biostimulants.....................................................................................270
Methods of application........................................................................................270
Conclusion and future prospectus.............................................................................272
References.................................................................................................................272
CHAPTER 14 Microbial biosurfactants: An eco-friendly perspective for
soil health management and environmental remediation.................. 277
Pankaj Sharma, Seema Sangwan, Sushila Singh, and
Harpreet Kaur
Introduction...............................................................................................................277
Chemical surfactants in agriculture..........................................................................277
Surfactant toxicity in life forms and agriculture.......................................................279
Biosurfactants: The potent alternate.........................................................................281
Agrochemicals in agriculture....................................................................................282
Negative impacts of agrochemicals..........................................................................282
Chemical surfactants as adjuvants in pesticide formulations...................................283
Biosurfactants as green alternative...........................................................................283
Superiority of biosurfactants over chemical surfactants...........................................285
Biosurfactants as adjuvants in agrochemical formulations.......................................286
Biosurfactants in environmental remediation...........................................................287
Biodegradation of pesticides.....................................................................................288
Bioremediation of heavy metals...............................................................................290
Bioremediation of hydrocarbon polluted soil...........................................................292
Conclusion................................................................................................................293
References.................................................................................................................293
xii Contents
Index....................................................................................................................................................361
This page intentionally left blank
Contributors
Md. Afjal Ahmad
Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,
BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Ramesh Alluri
Department of Pharmacology, Vishnu Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research,
Narsapur, Telangana, India
Stênio Nunes Alves
Disease Vectors Department, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil
Himadri Tanaya Behera
School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Alok Bharadwaj
Department of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
Khushbo Bhardwaj
Lab of Lifesciences, JECRC University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Ashok Bhattacharyya
Department of Plant Pathology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India
Sundaresan Bhavaniramya
College of Food and Dairy Technology, TANUVAS, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Rafael Dorighello Cadamuro
Laboratory of Apllied Virology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology,
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil
Surabhi Chaturvedi
Department of Botany, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Pulkit Chawla
Division of Microbiology, Centre for Conservation and Utilisation of Blue Green Algae, ICAR-Indian
Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
Mairon Cesar Coimbra
Pharmacobotany, Phytochemistry and Pharmacognosy Department, Federal University of São
João del-Rei, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil
Eduardo José Azevedo Corrêa
EPAMIG ITAC - Agricultural and Cooperativism Technical Institute, Pitangui; Disease Vectors
Department, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil
Santhosha Dasarapu
Department of Pharmacognosy, Vishnu Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research,
Narsapur, Telangana, India
Leonardo Henrique França de Lima
Biological and Exact Sciences Department, Federal University of São João Del-Rei, Sete Lagoas,
MG, Brazil
xv
xvi Contributors
Snehashis Mishra
School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Mohammad Reza Moosavi
Department of Plant Pathology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
Samapika Nandy
Department of Life Sciences, Presidency University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Adelaide Cássia Nardocci
School of Arts, Science and Humanities, University of São Paulo-Brazil; NARA—Center for
Research in Environmental Risk Assessment, School of Public Health, Environmental Health
Department, São Paulo, Brazil
Neemisha
Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
M. Nikhil Raj
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
Devendra Kumar Pandey
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology and Sciences, Lovely Professional University,
Phagwara, Punjab, India
K. Pandiyan
Ginning Training Centre, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Nagpur,
Maharashtra, India
Joginder Singh Panwar
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology and Sciences, Lovely Professional University,
Phagwara, Punjab, India
Prerana Parihar
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa
Vidyalaya, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
Amit Paschapur
ICAR—Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhana Sansthan, Almora, Uttarakhand, India
Jagdish Kumar Patidar
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa
Vidyalaya, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
Pravin Prakash
Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,
BHU, Varanasi, UP, India
Asha Singh Rajavat
ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Mau; Amity Institute of
Microbial Technology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Neeraj Rani
School of Organic Farming, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
xviii Contributors
Lopamudra Ray
School of Biotechnology; School of Law, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha,
India
Maria Tereza Pepe Razzzolini
School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo; NARA—Center for Research in Environmental
Risk Assessment, School of Public Health, Environmental Health Department, São Paulo, Brazil
Paula Rogovski
Laboratory of Apllied Virology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology,
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil
Vidya Sabbani
Department of Pharmacology, Vishnu Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research,
Narsapur, Telangana, India
Bandana Saikia
Department of Plant Pathology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India
Ipsita Samal
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
Seema Sangwan
Department of Microbiology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India
Maria Inês Zanoli Sato
Environmental Company of the State of São Paulo, Department of Environmental Analyses; NARA—
Center for Research in Environmental Risk Assessment, School of Public Health, Environmental
Health Department, São Paulo, Brazil
Ajit Kumar Savani
Department of Plant Pathology, ICAR-IIRR, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Beatriz Pereira Savi
Laboratory of Apllied Virology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology,
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil
Pankaj Sharma
Department of Microbiology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India
A.L. Singh
ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh, Gujarat, India
H.B. Singh
Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Applied Sciences & Humanities, GLA University,
Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
Puneet Singh
School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Purnima Singh
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa
Vidyalaya, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
Contributors xix
Sushila Singh
Department of Chemistry, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India
Sushmita Singh
ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh, Gujarat, India
A.R.N.S. Subbanna
ICAR—Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhana Sansthan, Almora, Uttarakhand, India
J.C. Tarafdar
Former UGC Emeritus Professor & ICAR Emeritus Scientist, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
Onkar Nath Tiwari
Division of Microbiology, Centre for Conservation and Utilisation of Blue Green Algae, ICAR-Indian
Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
Helen Treichel
Laboratory of Biochemistry and Genetics, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, Brazil
Sneha Tripathi
Department of Biotechnology, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, Uttar
Pradesh, India
Champa keya Tudu
Department of Life Sciences, Presidency University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Ramar Vanajothi
Cancer Genetics Lab, Department of Biomedical Science, Bharathidasan University, Trichy, Tamil
Nadu, India
Vanitha Kondi
Department of Pharmaceutics, Vishnu Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research,
Narsapur, Telangana, India
I. Venkatesh
Division of Plant Pathology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi, India
Aman Verma
ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh, Gujarat, India
Selvaraju Vishnupriya
College of Food and Dairy Technology, TANUVAS, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
This page intentionally left blank
About the editors
xxi
xxii About the editors
xxiii
xxiv Preface
Also, editors would like thank the handling editors and Elsevier for the opportunity to publish this
book. We are optimistic that this book will be effective in broadcasting the latest knowledge about
the plant biostimulants.
Anukool Vaishnav
Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura, India
Swiss Excellence Fellow, Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope (Reckenholz), Zürich, Switzerland
CHAPTER
Introduction
Biostimulants is a potent unique process used for the alteration of physiological progressions in plants
and significantly stimulates plant growth to alleviate stress-induced limitation by which it increases the
yield of the crops. The biostimulant products have been considered as an innovative agronomic tool
which significantly increases the scientific publications (Povero et al., 2016). European Biostimulants
Industry Council (EBIC) defines biostimulants as “substance(s) and or microorganisms whose function
when applied to plants or the rhizosphere is to stimulate natural processes to enhance/benefit nutrient
uptake, efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stress and crop quality.” Countries such as Italy, Spain are pro-
duced the biostimulants in large scale and commercialized in market (Traon et al., 2014). According to
the report of Grand View Research Inc., the biostimulants are expected to reach 4.41 billion UDS by
2025 (Biostimulants Market Size). Diverse molecules are present in the biostimulants and its complex
nature of these products leads more challenge to understand and describe these molecules that are more
active in biostimulants products. The extraction and purification of potent single compounds from this
mixture are more difficult and also is practically incredible to find the effectiveness of the biostimulant
because it is complex nature, but the significance of the synergistic action is changed hence the ap-
plication rules are always not clear. Based on these above reasons, European Commission proposed
new regulation in 2016, and approval of the proposal was done at 2019 (Grand View Research, 2018;
Yakhin et al., 2017). Plant biostimulants are distinctive products acquired from the diverse organic and
inorganic substances that can increase plant growth and also significantly reduce the undesirable im-
pacts of the abiotic stresses (Du Jardin, 2015; Rouphael and Colla, 2018). Biostimulants are a mixture
of organic-inorganic components like minerals, amino acids, vitamins, poly and oligosaccharides, and
trace amounts of plant hormones. Though, it is very essential to highlight the activity must not depend
on the nutrients component of the products or plant hormones. The mechanism of action of biostimu-
lants is more difficult to identify hence it is still under investigation (Paul et al., 2019). The advanced
technologies like high-throughput phenotyping and omic technologies are highly useful to understand
the action of biostimulants (Bulgari et al., 2017; Dalal et al., 2019; Nardi et al., 2009). Biostimulants di-
rectly influence plants physiology and its metabolism via enlightening the soil condition (Bulgari et al.,
2015; Caradonia et al., 2018). It also influences the utilization of nutrient efficiency via modification
of some molecular processes that allow refining water uptake and also stimulates the development of
New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85579-2.00008-3
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1
2 Chapter 1 Exploring the biostimulants in plant science
plants and neutralize abiotic stresses (Shah et al., 2018) by improving some of the primary and second-
ary metabolites (Nardi et al., 2009; Caradonia et al., 2018). The typical traditional biostimulants have
a wide range of bioactivities that effectively enhance the production and quality of the plants. For ex-
ample, the algal extracts contain several phytohormones including cytokinin, abscisic acid (ABA), and
auxin. However, it also contains other plant hormones like compounds like lunatic acids, polyamine,
etc. (Kusvuran et al., 2016). In-vitro approach under the sterile condition, the addition of biostimulant
in the pre-germination phase effectively enhances the plant germination and growth. However, the
understanding of the mode of action is essential and also needs clear evaluation and use for the pro-
cess of plant biostimulants. There are limited studies that have been reported on the detailed analysis
of the chemical composition and mode of action of biostimulants. In recent years, biostimulants have
attracted great attention and expanded the ranges of chemical constituents and mode of actions (Calvo
et al., 2014; Halpern et al., 2015). The biostimulants are highly beneficial to plants and act as soil
improvers. The present chapter is focused on the insights of biostimulants mode of action and main
categories of the biostimulant products and its applications in the field of agriculture and horticulture.
such as fucoidan, laminarin, and plant hormones to improve plant growth (Battacharyya et al., 2015).
The third major type of biostimulant is hydrolyzed proteins that have a combination of amino acids,
polypeptides, denatured proteins from both animal and plants to enhance the enzymatic reaction and
thermal hydrolysis (Colla et al., 2015). Several studies have been stated that the product of some viable
protein derived from animal source though it have some adverse impacts on plant growth compared
to a protein derived from plant origin (Cerdan et al., 2009; Lisiecka, 2011). The study carried out by
Botta (2012) reported that the treatment of plant with a protein hydrolysate show significant dry weight
compared to control. Generally, they isolated from soil, composted manners, water, and other organic
materials and significantly improve the crop productivity through metabolic activities and also induce
plant defense mechanism to increase the plant tolerance to many environmental stresses (Lucini et al.,
2015; Rouphael et al., 2017; Colla et al., 2017). This enhancement of the nutrients uptakes via nitrogen
fixation, they also alter the plant growth hormones such as cytokines and auxins which are responsible
for the plant tolerance and produce volatile organic compounds that have anun deviating impact on
the plants. The plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) significantly respond to abiotic stresses
including chemical and biological activities (Trevisan et al., 2019; Ruzzi and Aroca, 2015; Turan et al.,
2017). Biostimulants are also extracted from food waste and industrial waste which compost different
kinds of manure like vermicomposting and aquaculture wastes and are effectively improving crop pro-
ductivity and increasing the production of secondary metabolites involved in the physiological process.
It also enhances the activity of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) (Xu and Geelen, 2018; Ertani et al.,
2011).
The effect of PAL on the gene expression has been reported in several studies (Trevisan et al., 2019;
Ruzzi and Aroca, 2015), owing to the variety of the basis material and extraction methods, the action
of PAL is limited and the use of by-products and are transferred into fertilizing products (Yakhin et al.,
2017). It can be used to develop new fertilizer which is highly intensive on ecological farming. The
basic guidelines and regulations are significantly important for the production of a more eco-friendly
farming system and to maintain the crop quality which increases the price of synthetic fertilizers and the
withdrawal of the number of agrochemicals and complex effects on soil. Recently, the nanotechnology-
based new category of biostimulants has been reported by Juárez-Maldonado et al. (2019), which have
1–100 nm diameters and shows the great ability to alter the product quality and tolerance to abiotic
stresses even in very less quantity in nutrient solution and vegetable crops (Qi et al., 2013; Kiapour
et al., 2015; Lei et al., 2008; Khan, 2016). The interactions concerning the nanoparticles with plant
surfaces disturb transport of metabolites and receptor activity by altering the environmental factors.
This effect is fully not dependent on the chemical nature of the biostimulants moreover it can release
chemical elements such as irons, carbons that are highly involved in plant metabolism.
functions like cellular mechanisms are sustained by the antioxidant scavenging process to increase the
synthesis of auxin transports, and then the physiological functions may be referred to as a mode of ac-
tion of biostimulants. This effect may also explain the agricultural functions such as improved tolerance
to abiotic stress and increased nitrogen use efficacy and finally leads to economic and environmental
benefits such as high yield, reducing the usage of fertilizers, increasing the both value and productivity
of crop products. The effects of all biostimulants are converging essential functions including stress
tolerance and productivity in agricultural farms. These converging actions are based on biostimulants,
which stimulate the response of the pathogen by regulator genes are accomplished by several types
of biostimulants. However, the growing consents among the regulators to separate biostimulants and
biocontrols. Biotic stress is defined as the economic and environmental benefits depending on both ag-
ricultural and environmental policies in terms of objectives and assessment endpoints (Przybysz et al.,
2014; Du Jardin, 2015).
Types of biostimulants
Algal extracts
Biostimulants extracted from seaweed are emerging as one of the commercial formulations and are
often used for plant growth and stimulating the essential factors and also acts as a potent process to
progress the tolerance to abiotic factors such as heat, salinity, and drought. These algal extracts signifi-
cantly target several pathways by which it increases the tolerance under several environmental stresses.
The extract from macroalgae including seaweed has been used as potent organic fertilizers since an-
cient times (Craigie, 2011; Battacharyya et al., 2015). Currently, there are 47 industries involved in
the production of algal extracts for cultivation purposes; the majority of the algal preparations have
brown algae Ascophyllum nodosum as major source (Sharma et al., 2014). The other growth-promoting
seaweeds have also been reported (Verkleij, 1992), however, the mechanism of action of these algal
extracts remains unclear. Owing to their complexity of the seaweed extracts it is difficult to deter-
mine the exact main components and its essential role. Commercial formulations of seaweed extracts
largely depend on the extraction methods. Indeed, the characterization of the major constituents of
biostimulants would be a beneficial for understanding the relationship of mechanism of action. The
methods such as pulverization, alkali, and acid extractions, and mechanical disruption are the most
common methods used for the algal extraction (Battacharyya et al., 2015). The algal species such as
red (Lithothamnium calcareum), brown (Ascophyllum nodosum, Durvillaea potatorum) are the most
used macroalgae, the extracts enhance the tolerance, very recently it has absorbed on their capability to
enhances the tolerance to low temperature (Khan et al., 2009). In another approach, the use of multiple
algal extracts also enhances the cold tolerance (e.g., Maize) and is rich in Zn and Mn hence it also en-
hances the reactive oxygen scavenging responses (Bradacova et al., 2016). The results revealed that the
stress prompted by the low temperature significantly be overwhelmed by the application of seaweed
rich in micronutrients to develop oxidative stress tolerance. Several studies reported that seedlings corn
under root chilling stress and to determine the physiological and molecular response by micronutrients
(Imran et al., 2013). Rayirath et al. (2009) reported that major active components of A. nodosum ex-
tracts and treated with Arabidopsis thaliana at very low temperature. The results demonstrated the sub
fraction of ethyl acetate was rich in fatty acids and sterols. These bioactive compounds are effectively
enhanced the freezing tolerance at − 2.5 to − 5.5 °C. The plants treated with biostimulant recover more
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
I took our cook with us, but Khatíb provided some excellent Moorish dishes,
and all kinds of delicacies and sweets. During my stay he insisted on coming to my
dwelling for the conference instead of my going to him. I only stayed a couple of
days.
I am now so busy that time passes most rapidly.
BENABU. 1857.
Poor Benabu has been arrested at Fas by the Sultan and imprisoned. All his
property has been confiscated except the house in which he lived. The property
and jewels of his wives have not yet been touched.
To the surprise of everybody the Sultan has appointed, in Benabu’s place as
Basha, the youngest son of the former governor of Tangier, Alarbi el Saidi. He was
a bookbinder and very poor, but no sooner did he get the Sultan’s letter, than he
assumed the reins of power well, and with the dignity of a grandee. We are already
good friends.
Affairs were in a critical state in 1858, and Mr. Hay, who had
applied for leave of absence, which was granted only to be
immediately cancelled, writes to his wife on May 12:—
Only fancy what a shell has burst on me, scattering all my plans, especially as
last week I received my four months leave in full form! The fact is that affairs in
Europe are in such a state that Government wishes every man, I suppose, to be at
his post, ready to do his best in the moment of danger. Morocco is ticklish ground,
and it is here we might be exposed to a movement on the part of France, which
might prove a severe check to us in our naval preponderance in the
Mediterranean.
Here I am, again, all alone on the 1st of June. I miss you and the children more
than ever; but I know there are yearning hearts and thoughts for me on this day,
and that I am not forgotten.
By way of amusing me, I have just received from Government a dispatch telling
me to report upon a bundle of false allegations made against me by two
discontented merchants of Mogador. I am put out, and yet pleased, at having an
opportunity to let Lord Malmesbury know what I have done, in contradiction of
what these folk accuse me of not having done. I hear also of a virulent article, or
letter, which has appeared in the Daily News against me. The Gibraltar merchants
are very angry at the attack upon me, and I daresay they will defend me without
my saying a word—at least, I flatter myself they will.
He was not mistaken in his hope that his conduct would find
defenders at Gibraltar. Three weeks later he writes:—
I think I have told you I received a very handsome letter from the Gibraltar
merchants, quoting a resolution, dated June 1, in which, amongst other
compliments, they resolved, ‘That this Committee desires to express its strong
disapproval of the tone in which the letter in the Daily News of April 24 is couched
—casting reflections upon Her Majesty’s Chargé d’Affaires, Mr. Drummond Hay—
and its dissent from the opinions expressed by the writer with reference to the late
Treaty with Morocco. . . . That this Committee desires at once to place on record
its most grateful appreciation of Mr. Hay’s eminent public services in the protection
and support of British subjects in Morocco, and for his prompt and courteous
attention to the demands and complaints of British subjects.’
So you see the abuse of two men calls forth the praise of many others, and I
am the gainer.
The Sultan has just sent me a present of a most beautiful leopard. Fat, sleek,
and tame as a cat. He is chained up in the stable. I shall give him to the Queen, or
to the Zoo gardens, which will be the same thing. I wish you and the children were
here to see the beautiful creature.
I am in high favour, they tell me, with the Sultan, so I get a leopard. It is like the
gift of the white elephant to the unruly chiefs in India.