Risk Assessment (Rev.2)

Revision No: 2 - Issue Date: 09.02.
2018
SMS FORM NO: 034001
Page 1 of 8
RISK ASSESSMENT
Risk Management
Operation / Work activity being Ballast Water Treatment System Failure
assessed: Routine Non-routine
Generated by: Vessel (record the name) Office Recep AYDIN – Tech. Manager // Bulent ILBAY – Fleet Manager
Code number (to be assigned by the Office):
FREQUENCY CATEGORY CONSEQUENCE CATEGORY RISK MATRIX

Frequent -
More often Human Major pollution / Excessive/ high Major national
Possibility
5 of repeated
than once 4 losses / Full scale cost damage & international
incidents
per voyage fatalities response >$1000000 impact FREQUENCY
Moderate
Probable - Moderate cost
Serious pollution/
Possibility Once per or damage Considerable
4 of isolated year
3 injury to Significant
(100000 – impact
incidents
personnel resources
1000000$)
1 2 3 4 5
commitment
Number of
minor 1 L(1) L(2) L(3) M(4) M(5)
Occasional- Little cost or
injuries / Little pollution /
CONSEQUENCE
Possibility Once per 5 damage
3 of occurring years
2 Medical Limited response
($10000 – $
Slight impact
treatment of short duration 2 L(2) M(4) M(6) M(8) H(10)
sometime 100000)
for
personnel
Remote- Minimum
Once per
2 Not likely to
10 years pollution / Minimum cost / 3 L(3) M(6) M(9) H(12) H(15)
occur Few minor Little or no
1 damage Zero impact
Very injuries response < $10000
Once per
unlikely- 4
1 Practically
30 years or needed M(4) M(8) H(12) H(16) H(20)
more
impossible
High=Intolerable Risk Medium=Tolerable Risk Low=Negligible Risk
Risk Assessment
Risk Identification Risk Analysis Initial risk
evaluation
Potential
No Hazard hazardous Existing control measures F C R
event
01 Ballast water treatment system not Failure to Post Extra lookouts. Fog signals on. Securite 5 4 H20
operational identify target broadcast made. Consider anchoring /stopping till
resulting in visibility improves / defect rectified
Collision,
Revision No: 2 - Issue Date: 09.02.2018
SMS FORM NO: 034001
Page 2 of 8
RISK ASSESSMENT
Pollution or
grounding.
Non compliance with Ballast water Additional lookout, Upgrade bridge manning, E/Room
02 Collision 4 3 H12
management plan manned. Confirm vessel on safe speed.
Erratic signal
input will lead
Delays to the vessel/ Vessel stresses and to wrong Ais data to be used cautiously only for identification.
03 stability condition while conducting output Security message to be broadcasted to vessels in 4 3 H12
exchange information to vicinity
own and other
vessels.
Shore
Office to be immediately informed. Seek shore
04 assistance not 2 2 M4
assistance for repairs.
available
Failure to
identify target
Additional lookout, Upgrade bridge manning, E/Room
resulting in
05 manned. Confirm vessel on safe speed.Security 2 2 M4
Collision,
message to be broadcasted to vessels in vicinity
Pollution or
grounding.
Failure to
identify target
resulting in
06 manned. Confirm vessel on safe speed.Security 4 4 H16
Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
Failure to
identify target
resulting in
07 manned. Confirm vessel on safe speed.Security 5 2 H10
Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
08 Failure to Additional lookout, Upgrade bridge manning, E/Room 3 3 M9
identify target manned. Confirm vessel on safe speed.Security
resulting in message to be broadcasted to vessels in vicinity
Collision,
SMS FORM NO: 034001
Page 3 of 8
RISK ASSESSMENT
Pollution or
grounding.
Proper Passage plan, Additional lookout. Consider
Grounding. aborting pilot boarding and get AIS repaired prior
Coasting, Making landfall, Port / Harbor
09 Collision. berthing operations commence.Securite broadcast 4 2 M8
approaches
Pollution. made. AIS data used with caution. Information to be
passed on during Master/Pilot Exchange
Post extra lookouts, enhance level of supervision by
Close Quarter senior officers.Broadcast securite message on VHF if
10 High Traffic density 2 2 M4
situation required. BWL as per company policy. Proceed at
safe speed
Shore
11 Inadequate Communication (External) assistance not 3 3 M9
available
Erratic signal
input will lead
Ais data to be used cautiously only for identification.
to wrong
Effect of incorrect input on other navigation Security message to be broadcasted to vessels in
12 output 2 2 M4
equipment such as Radar, ARPA, Ecdis, etc. vicinity. Radar aperformances to be checked during
information to
every watch.
own and other
vessels.
Failure to
identify target
resulting in
13 Non availability of repair manned. Confirm vessel on safe speed.Security 2 2 M4
Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
Failure to
identify target
Unreliable information on the ECDIS resulting in
interface Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
15 Possibility of AIS info not seen by port/other Failure to Additional lookout, Upgrade bridge manning, E/Room 3 3 M9
vessel identify target manned. Confirm vessel on safe speed.Security
resulting in message to be broadcasted to vessels in vicinity
SMS FORM NO: 034001
Page 4 of 8
RISK ASSESSMENT
Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
Failure to
identify target
Identification of vessels cannot be done by resulting in
AIS Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
Failure to
Advice pilot for every movement of other ships in
identify target
vicinity.Additional lookout, Upgrade bridge manning,
resulting in
17 Pilot cannot use the AIS plug in E/Room manned. Confirm vessel on safe 2 2 M4
Collision,
speed.Security message to be broadcasted to
Pollution or
vessels in vicinity
grounding.
Concern
regarding
safety of ship
and
Counter measures need to be taken to negate such
crew.Failure to
18 Detention by PSC hazards.Dispensation for defective AIS need to be 3 3 M9
identify target
taken.
resulting in
Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
Adequate training of personnel through various BTM,
Grounding.
Human Error, Excessive speed or Improper BRM courses and on board training and briefing.
19 Collision. 2 2 M4
judgment Proper Passage plan and execution. Reduce speed
Pollution.
as required.
Shore
20 Inadequate Communication (External) assistance not 3 3 M9
available
21 Effect of incorrect input on other navigation Erratic signal Ais data to be used cautiously only for identification. 3 3 M9
equipment such as Radar, ARPA, Ecdis, etc. input will lead Security message to be broadcasted to vessels in
to wrong vicinity
output
SMS FORM NO: 034001
Page 5 of 8
RISK ASSESSMENT
information to
own and other
vessels.
Erratic or nil
info from own
vessel will lead Ais data to be used cautiously only for identification.
Effect of not gaining own vessel data to
22 to wrong Security message to be broadcasted to vessels in 3 3 M9
other vessels
output vicinity
information to
other vessels.
Failure to
identify target
resulting in
23 Non availability of repair manned. Confirm vessel on safe speed.Security 2 2 M4
Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
Failure to
identify target
Unreliable information on the ECDIS resulting in
interface Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
Failure to
identify target
Possibility of AIS info not seen by port/other resulting in
vessels Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
Failure to
identify target
Identification of vessels cannot be done by resulting in
AIS Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
27 Pilot cannot use the AIS plug in Failure to Advice pilot for every movement of other ships in 2 2 M4
identify target vicinity.Additional lookout, Upgrade bridge manning,
SMS FORM NO: 034001
Page 6 of 8
RISK ASSESSMENT
resulting in
E/Room manned. Confirm vessel on safe
Collision,
speed.Security message to be broadcasted to
Pollution or
vessels in vicinity
grounding.
Concern
regarding
safety of ship
and
Counter measures need to be taken to negate such
crew.Failure to
28 Detention by PSC hazards.Dispensation for defective AIS need to be 3 3 M9
identify target
taken.
resulting in
Collision,
Pollution or
grounding.
Note F: Frequency, C: Consequence, R: Risk
Risk Treatment Residual
risk
evaluation
Hazard Responsible Action Timeline
Additional Risk Control Measures F C R
No.
01 1. Notification to port authorities of the defective BWTS Master/Company During Sail 1 1 L1
prior to entering any port and comply with Port state
requirements for BWM.
2. Comply with all contingency measures for BWM
according to IMOBWM.2/Circ. 62
3. Flag state informed of in operational BWTS system and
exemption requested for same.
4. Failure of system recorded in Ballast water record book.
02 1. Vessel to intake minimum ballast in adequate dept of Master/Company During Sail 1 1 L1
waters required for safe operations and discharge
minimum ballast at the loading port.
2. Carry out ballast exchange at sea as per D1 standards.
3. Ballast to be discharged in agreement with Port state.
03 1. Inform port state about the in operational BWTS and Master/OOW During Sail 3 1 L3
conduct measures as acceptable to port state
2. Detailed Ballast exchange to be prepared and approved
SMS FORM NO: 034001
Page 7 of 8
RISK ASSESSMENT
by Master.
3. Calculate vessel stability and stresses calculation at
every stage prior conducting exchange at sea, ballast
exchange conducted in favourable weather conditions.
04 Master/OOW During Sail 1 1 L1
05 Company On arrival 2 1 L2
06 Master/OOW During Sail 3 3 M9
07 Master/Company During Sail 2 2 M4
13 Master/Company On arrival 2 1 L1
23 Master/Company On arrival 2 2 M4
Note F: Frequency, C: Consequence, R: Risk
ALTERNATIVE WAYS TO CONDUCT THE WORK (a new RA should be conducted for the alternative way decided)
SMS FORM NO: 034001
Page 8 of 8
RISK ASSESSMENT
ALTERNATIVE WAYS TO CONDUCT THE WORK (a new RA should be conducted for the alternative way decided)
NA
Are any amendments to IMS required (related to the above Additional Risk Control Measures)?
Yes Describe:
No
Are any spare parts or service attendance required (related to the above Additional Risk Control Measures) ?
Yes Describe:
No
Contingency plans (to facilitate safe management and recovery of the situation in case of any unplanned occurrences)
Emergency case Contingency Plans
No-1 ME Failure
No-3 Collision
No-4 Grounding
No-13 Injury
Risk Management Team
Name Rank / Title Signature Date
Bulent ILBAY Fleet Manager 07 March 2024
Recep AYDIN Technical Manager 07 March 2024
Remarks:
Risk Assessment reviewed/approved by:
Name Rank / Title Signature Date
H.Gokhan OZGAL DPA/CSO 07 March 2024
Remarks:

Risk Assessment (Rev.2)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Risk Assessment (Rev.2)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Revision No: 2 - Issue Date: 09.02.

FREQUENCY CATEGORY CONSEQUENCE CATEGORY RISK MATRIX

You might also like