Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download textbook Bioremediation And Sustainable Technologies For Cleaner Environment 1St Edition Marimuthu Prashanthi ebook all chapter pdf
Download textbook Bioremediation And Sustainable Technologies For Cleaner Environment 1St Edition Marimuthu Prashanthi ebook all chapter pdf
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-building-for-a-
cleaner-environment-ali-sayigh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/heavy-metals-in-the-environment-
microorganisms-and-bioremediation-1st-edition-edgardo-r-donati/
https://textbookfull.com/product/emerging-technologies-in-
environmental-bioremediation-1st-edition-maulin-p-shah/
https://textbookfull.com/product/microorganisms-for-sustainable-
environment-and-health-1st-edition-pankaj-chowdhary-editor/
Sustainable Future for Human Security Environment and
Resources 1st Edition Benjamin Mclellan (Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-future-for-human-
security-environment-and-resources-1st-edition-benjamin-mclellan-
eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/bioremediation-and-
bioeconomy-1st-edition-prasad/
https://textbookfull.com/product/future-challenges-for-
sustainable-development-within-the-built-environment-brandon/
https://textbookfull.com/product/supercritical-water-processing-
technologies-for-environment-energy-and-nanomaterial-
applications-shuzhong-wang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/digital-technologies-
sustainable-innovations-for-improving-teaching-and-learning-1st-
edition-demetrios-sampson/
Environmental Science
Marimuthu Prashanthi
Rajakumar Sundaram
Aravind Jeyaseelan
Thamaraiselvi Kaliannan Editors
Bioremediation
and Sustainable
Technologies
for Cleaner
Environment
Environmental Science and Engineering
Environmental Science
Series editors
Ulrich Förstner, Hamburg, Germany
Wim H. Rulkens, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Wim Salomons, Haren, The Netherlands
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/3234
Marimuthu Prashanthi Rajakumar Sundaram
•
Editors
Bioremediation
and Sustainable Technologies
for Cleaner Environment
123
Editors
Marimuthu Prashanthi Aravind Jeyaseelan
Department of Environmental Management Department of Biotechnology
Bharathidasan University Addis Ababa Science and Technology
Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu University
India Addis Ababa
Ethiopia
Rajakumar Sundaram
Department of Marine Biotechnology Thamaraiselvi Kaliannan
Bharathidasan University Department of Environmental
Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu Biotechnology
India Bharathidasan University
Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu
India
vii
viii Preface
In short, this book discusses the scope of bioremediation and the assessment of
various biological approaches to the remediation in itself with much attention being
paid to the biological products derived from the waste processes.
ix
x Contents
Abstract Use of pesticide is increasing day by day and the positive aspect renders
enhanced crop/food productivity and drastic reduction of vector-borne diseases.
However, its unregulated and indiscriminate applications have raised serious con-
cerns in environmental pollution and health effects. Bioremediation methods use
naturally occurring microorganisms to detoxify these pollutants and make soil
fertile in the process. Bacterial degradation is one of the most environmentally
sound, cost effective and quick process for the pesticide contaminated environment.
This study includes the usage and the effects of pesticides, bacterial degradation,
genetically modified bacteria, enzymatic immobilization approach and few limita-
tions of biodegradation.
1 Introduction
that produce disease), attractants (attract specific pests using natural insect chemi-
cals called pheromones that confuse the mating behavior of insects), avicides
(control pest birds), biopesticides (naturally occurring substance with pesticidal
properties), defoliants (cause foliage to drop from a plant, typically to aid in the
harvesting process), desiccants (aid in the drying process of plants or insects,
usually for laboratory purposes), fumigants (produce vapors or gases to control air
or soilborne insects and diseases), fungicides (destroy fungi that infect plants,
animals or people), herbicides (control noxious weeds and other vegetation that are
growing or competing with a desired species), insect growth regulators (accelerate
or retard the rate of growth of insects), insecticides (control or eliminate insects that
affect plants, animals or people), mitticide/acaricides (kill mites that live on plants,
livestock and people), molluscicides (kill snails and slugs), nematicide (kill
nematodes, which are microscopic wormlike organisms that live in the soil and
cause damage to food crops), ovicides (control insect eggs through the application
of low-sulfur petroleum oils to plants and animals), piscicides (control pest fish),
plant growth regulators (accelerate or retard the rate growth of plant), predacides
(control vertebrate pests), repellents (repel pests such as mosquitoes, flies, ticks and
fleas), rodenticides (control mice, rats and other rodents) (Gavrilescu 2005).
About two million tonnes of pesticides are consumed per year throughout the
world and among the 2 million tonnes, 24% is consumed in USA, 45% in Europe
and 25% in rest of the world. The usage of pesticide in India is about 0.5 kg/ha of
which major contribution is from organochlorine pesticides and the consumption of
herbicide is the highest (Odukkathil and Vasudevan 2013). The Indian Pesticide
Industry with 82,000 MT of production for the year 2005–2006 is ranked second in
Asia (behind China) and ranks twelfth in the world for the use of pesticides with an
annual production of 90,000 tons (Boricha and Fulekar 2009). Pesticide residue in
environment ultimately affects the health of man and other organisms. In man it
triggers acquired immunodeficiency (immunosuppression), autoimmunity, hyper-
sensitivity reactions, like eczema, dermatitis, allergic respiratory diseases and
recurrent infections. Many pesticides are known to cause mutations in chromo-
somes of man and animals which may lead to carcinoma, neuropathy, nephropathy,
hepatotoxicity and reproductive disorders (Chauhan and Singhal 2006). Table 1
represents the different classes of pesticides and their effects in human health.
Most of the pesticide groups have dual/multiple properties. Based on the classified
list of pesticides (http://www.alanwood.net/pesticides/class_pesticides.html), the
present study analysed the different purposes of the chemicals as pesticides. The
chemicals viz. bifujunzhi, binapacryl, dinobuton, dinocap, dinocton, dinopenton,
dinosulfon, dinoterbon, disulfiram, flufenoxystrobin, sulfur and thioquinox have
acaricides and fungicide properties. In addition to act as acaricides, some are
effective against insects. Some algicides are used for additional purpose as fungi-
cides and herbicides. Particular fungicides are used as bactericides, herbicides,
insecticides and growth regulators. As well few insecticides have the properties of
molluscicides and nematicides. Besides, multiple properties of a particular chemical
are represented graphically as network model in Fig. 1.
Based on these data, this study suggested to use single compound with multiple
properties based on the requirement of the particular agricultural field, so as the
pollution may control. The major component of chemicals involved in these pes-
ticides are chlordime form, hexachlorophene, coumaphos, diazinon, methiocarb,
DNOC, sanguinarine, carvacrol, benomyl, carbaryl, arsenous oxide, fentin,
dichlorophen, copper sulfate, endothal, guazatine, chloralose, endrin, fenthion,
strychnine, probenazole, xinjunan, copper oxychloride, thiram, ziram, trimethacarb,
diflubenzuron, penfluron, dichlofluanid, pentachlorophenol, allicin, zinc naph-
thenate, sodium pentachlorophenoxide, carvone, cyprosulfamide, zengxiaoan,
sodium tetrathiocarbonate, cloethocarb, copper acetoarsenite, lead arsenate, tribu-
tyltin oxide, tribufos and lindane.
6 S. Umadevi et al.
3 Biodegradation Process
All the organic compounds that occur naturally and most of those synthesized by
man can be decomposed in soil by a combination of chemical and biological action.
The pesticide degradation process includes biodegradation, chemical degradation,
hydrolysis, oxidation-reduction (redox), ionization and photo-degradation (Zhang
and Qiao 2002). Biodegradation is the ecofriendly way of converting pesticides into
simple non-toxic compounds by means of enzymes generally produced by microbes
(Fig. 2).
The factors related degradation include the concentration of appropriate
microbes, their interaction with pesticide, pH, temperature, salinity, nutrients, light
intensity, available water, oxygen tension, redox potential, surface binding, pres-
ence of alternative carbon substrates, alternative electron acceptor. The second
group of factors includes chemical structure, molecular weight, functional groups of
the applied pesticides, their concentration, toxicity and their solubility in water.
Biological Perspective and Role of Bacteria … 7
Different techniques employed for bioremediation comes under in situ and ex situ
processes. In situ remediation includes bioventing, biosparging, biostimulation,
bioaugmentation and ex situ techniques includes land farming, biopiling, com-
posting, bioreactors, precipitation/flocculation microfiltration and electro dialysis
(later three not applicable for biodegradation). There is a significant role of meta-
bolic activity of bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes and plants (including rhizosphere
bacteria) in the degradation process.
Bacteria are the potential degraders of complex molecules and uses pesticides for
their own metabolism and growth. Recent studies were reviewed by Hussain et al.
(2009) and Sinha et al. (2009) and have indicated that different bacterial species
apparently have different sensitivity to pesticides (Table 2).
8 S. Umadevi et al.
Table 2 (continued)
Pesticide group Microorganism
Propoxur Pseudomonas sp.
Pyrethroidallethrin, beta-cyfluthrin, Acidomonas sp., Aeromonas sobria, Erwinia
bifenthrin,cypermethrin, flumethrin and carotovora, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Serratia sp.,
permethrin Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila and Yersinia
Frederiksenii
Trifluralin Bacillus sp., Brevundimonas diminuta,
Herbaspirillum sp., Klebsiella sp. and
Pseudomonas sp.
Vinclozolin Pseudomonas putida
Table 3 Surface cell display of enzymes in recombinant strains for biodegradation of pesticides
Strain Fusion system Comments
Escherichia Truncated ice Hydrolysis of methyl parathion occurred 25 fold faster
coli nucleation protein than in wild type
Escherichia Ice nucleation Biodegradation of paraoxon occurred at rate of
coli protein 0.65 mM/min/g of cells (dry weight) and retained
almost 100% efficiency over a period of 45 days
Escherichia Ice nucleation More than 80% of the malathion was degraded and
coli protein was highly promising for detoxification of
organophosphorus pesticides
Moraxella sp. Ice nucleation Hydrolysis of methyl parathion, parathion, and
protein paraoxon occurred at rate of 0.6 micromol/h/mg dry
weights, 1.5 micromol/h/mg dry weights, and 9.0
micromol/h/mg dry weights, respectively
Pseudomonas Ice nucleation The whole cell activity increased up to 10 times
putida protein anchor higher, which could be helpful in accelerated
biodegradation
Source Hussain et al. (2009)
5 Limitations of Bioremediation
6 Conclusion
The removal of wide range of pesticide groups from the environment requires
knowledge of its concentration in particular environment. It requires further
exploration in relation to total microbial population and their biochemical activities,
environmental limiting factors, physiology and genetics of degradation of bac-
terium. It is concluded that the knowledge of physiology, biochemistry and genetics
of bacteria may further enhance degradation of pesticide groups. Genes encoding
for the active enzyme were identified for several pesticides, which will provide
better understanding and inputs to develop a super strain to achieve the desired
effect of bioremediation.
12 S. Umadevi et al.
References
Ang EL, Zhao HM, Obbard JP (2005) Recent advances in the bioremediation of persistent organic
pollutants via biomolecular engineering. Enzyme Microb Technol 37:487–496
Boricha H, Fulekar MH (2009) Pseudomonas plecoglossicida as a novel organism for the
bioremediation of cypermethrin. Biol Med 1(4):1–10
Cao X, Yang C, Liu R, Li Q, Zhang W, Liu J, Song C, Qiao C, Mulchandani A (2013)
Simultaneous degradation of organophosphate and organochlorine pesticides by
Sphingobiumjaponicum UT26 with surface-displayed organophosphorus hydrolase.
Biodegradation 24(2):295–303
Chauhan RS, Singhal L (2006) Harmful effects of pesticides and their control through cowpathy.
Int J Cow Sci 2(1):61–70
Gao Y, Truong YB, Cacioli P, Butler P, Kyratzis IL (2014). Bioremediation of pesticide
contaminated water using an organophosphate degrading enzyme immobilized on nonwoven
polyester textiles. Enzyme Microb Technol 54:38–44
Gavrilescu M (2005) Fate of pesticides in environment and its bioremediation. Eng Life Sci 5
(6):497–526
Ghanem E, Raushel FM (2005) Detoxification of organophosphate nerve agents by bacterial
phosphotriesterase. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207:459–470
Hussain S, Siddique T, Arshad M, Saleem M (2009) Bioremediation and phytoremediation of
pesticides: recent advances. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39(10):843–907
Lee SY, Choi JH, Xu Z (2003) Microbial cell-surface display. Trends Biotechnol 21:45–52
Nawaz K, Hussain K, Choudary N, Majeed A, Ilyas U, Ghani A, Lin F, Ali K, Afghan S, Raza G,
Lashari MI (2011) Eco-friendly role of biodegradation against agricultural pesticides hazards.
Afr J Microbiol Res 5(3):177–183
Niti C, Sunita S, Kamlesh K, Rakesh K (2013) Bioremediation: An emerging technology for
remediation of pesticides. Res J Chem Environ 17(4):88–105
Odukkathil G, Vasudevan N (2013) Toxicity and bioremediation of pesticides in agricultural soil.
Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technol 12:421–444
Singh DK (2008) Biodradation and bioremediation of pesticide in soil: Concept, method and
recent developments. Indian J Microbiol 48:35–40
Sinha S, Chattopadhyay P, Pan I, Chatterjee S, Chanda P, Bandyopadhyay D, Das K, Sen SK
(2009) Microbial transformation of xenobiotics for environmental bioremediation. Afr J
Biotechnol 8(22):6016–6027
Strong LC, McTavish H, Sadowsky MJ, Wackett LP (2000) Field-scale remediation of
atrazine-contaminated soil using recombinant Escherichia coliexpressing atrazine chlorohy-
drolase. Environ Microbiol 2:91–98
Umadevi S, Emmanuel AS, Ayyasamy PM, Rajakumar S (2015) Computational approaches in
waste management: Special emphasis in microbial degradation. Res Rev J Ecol Environ Sci
22–27
Zhang JL, Qiao CL (2002) Novel approaches for remediation of pesticide pollutants. Int J Environ
Pollut 18:423–433
Nanobioremediation Technologies
for Sustainable Environment
1 Introduction
One of the restoration strategies used nowadays is bioremediation which makes use
of microorganisms. The advantages of bioremediation over conventional treatments is
cost effectiveness, high competence, minimization of chemical and biological sludge,
selectivity to specific metals, no supplementary nutrient requirements, regeneration of
biosorbent, and the possibility of metal recovery (Kratochvil and Volesky 1998).
However this treatment method is not feasible for sites contaminated with toxic
substances as it is harmful to microorganisms.
Nanoparticles however have the unique capability to remediate such toxic
environments and also provide a healthy substrate for microbial activity thus
speeding up the process of environment clean-up. Nanoparticles can be prepared by
physico-chemical methods (Masala and Seshadri 2004; Swihart 2003) but the use of
hazardous chemicals, high cost and toxic byproducts has given biological
nanoparticle synthesis an advantage (Konishi et al. 2006). Nanobioremediation is
the use of nanoparticles to remove pollutants by enhancing microbial activity.
Nanoparticles (NPs) may be either metallic or nonmetallic and differently
shaped. NPs are of the following types-single metal NPs, bimetallic NPs, carbon
based NPs, modified NPs etc. Metal nanoparticles have applications in different
fields like medical imaging (Lee et al. 2008a), drug delivery (Horcajada et al. 2008),
electronics (Lipovsky et al. 2008), nanocomposites (Seager et al. 2007), biolabeling
(Liang et al. 2006), biocide or antimicrobial agents (Sanpui et al. 2008), sensors
(Jiang et al. 2008), non-linear optics (Ebothe et al. 2006), hyperthermia of tumors
(Pissuwan et al. 2006), intercalation materials for electrical batteries (Klaus-Joerger
et al. 2001), optical receptors (Dahan et al. 2003) etc. The wide range of applica-
tions of nanoparticles is due to their unique optical, thermal, electrical, chemical,
and physical properties (Panigrahi et al. 2004).
Nanoscale materials has the following characteristics—Larger surface area per unit
mass, show quantum effect and hence is more reactive, exhibit plasmon resonance and
can diffuse or penetrate contaminated sites easily. Selective sample extraction can be
achieved by modifying the surface functionality of the nanoparticles.
In this review we have focused on the biosynthesis of five nanoparticles (Zn, Ag,
Au, Fe, Cu) using plant extracts, bacteria, fungi and algae. We have also compiled
the different degrading and remediation activities of these nanoparticles for possible
large scale restoration programs.
In the last two decades ZnNP’s have been given significant attention owing to its
applications in varied fields like piezoelectric films (Martin et al. 2000), piezo-
electric sensor (Wang et al. 2004), ceramics (Grigorjeva et al. 2008), photo catalysis
Nanobioremediation Technologies for Sustainable Environment 15
(Pal and Sharon 2002) solar cells (Gordillo 2002), bio-imaging, drug delivery
(Xiong 2013) actuator, biosensors (Yang et al. 2012) and water purification
specifically arsenic removal (Singh et al. 2013b).
Owing to the wide applications of ZnNP’s it has been synthesized by methods
such as wet chemical method (Lee et al. 2009; Mehta et al. 2012), organic solvent
method (Mezni et al. 2012) and microwave method (Nehru et al. 2012). However
biological synthesis using bacteria, fungi, algae and plant extracts is the method of
choice and many researchers have been successful in synthesizing ZnNPs
(Table 1).
Gold nanoparticles show high chemical reactivity on comparison with bulk gold. It
exhibits surface plasm on oscillations which can be used in fields like labeling,
imaging and sensing. AuNPs are biocompatible and hence can be used in disease
diagnosis and therapy. AuNPs have been biosynthesized from plant extracts, bac-
teria, fungi and algae. Table 3 focuses on the biological synthesis of AuNP’s.
The three major forms of iron oxides found in nature are magnetite (Fe3O4),
maghemite (c-Fe2O3), and hematite (a-Fe2O3) (Cornel and Schwertmann 1996). Of
all the different kinds of iron oxides, magnetite have aroused the interest of many
researchers owing to the fact that it can be easily synthesised, can be modified or
coated and has superparamagnetic characteristics (McHenry and Laughlin 2000).
This property makes it easy to separate these supermagnetic particles from aqueous
solution and complicated matrices by applying an external magnetic field. Some
problems associated with using FeNP’s are its intrinsic instability resulting in the
formation of agglomerates and its high chemical activity which promotes oxidation,
subsequent loss of magnetism and dispersion. Hence for application in various
fields these nanoparticles have to be coated with either inorganic substances like
silica, carbon etc., or with organic species like surfactants and polymers (Wu et al.
2013). Iron nanoparticles have been synthesized by various chemical and physical
methods (Afonso et al. 2011). Some emerging methods of synthesis of iron
nanoparticles are the use of microorganisms and plant extracts which exclude the
use of harmful chemicals and toxic byproducts (Table 4).
Copper is one of the most widely used materials in the world owing to its usage in
fields like electricity, optics, catalysis, biomedical and antimicrobial applications.
Many researchers have been successful in the biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles
using the seed, flower, leaves and fruit skin of plants (Table 5). The nanoparticles
synthesized from plant extracts were found to be covered by the medicinal prop-
erties of the plant. CuNP is an antimicrobial agent used in food packaging and water
treatment.
Exercises.
1. What are the advantages to be derived from teaching a group rather than an
individual?
2. What is the ideal relationship between teacher and pupils?
3. Why should a pupil face his classmates when he recites?
4. How could you provide for class discussions with the pupils you teach?
5. Name class projects which your class has undertaken which involve
coöperation and end in a product which children consider worth working for.
6. Why do the household and industrial arts lend themselves especially well to
the development of the social phases of the recitation?
7. When should it be wrong for one pupil to help another? Name as many
occasions as you can where you would encourage coöperation and helpfulness.
8. Give an illustration of one project which may furnish an adequate motive for
work in several school subjects.
9. Of what value are associations of parents and teachers from the standpoint of
increasing the efficiency of school work?
10. Why is a genuinely social situation the best for the development of
intellectual vigor?
11. Do you think children ought to accept any social responsibility outside of the
school and home?
12. How may we hope to develop in children the desire to serve, the willingness
to work for the general good?
13. How would you change your work in order to accomplish the most possible
for the development of children who are now socially efficient?
14. Ought we to expect all children to accept the same social responsibilities,
either as to kind or degree, in the school or in their out-of-school life?
15. If children do not work together for common ends in our schools, if the spirit
of coöperation and service is not present there, ought we to be surprised at the
non-social or anti-social attitude and practice of adults?
CHAPTER XIII
T H E P H Y S I C A L W E L FA R E O F C H I L D R E N
Exercises.
1. How may the school superinduce physical defects in children?
2. Why are schoolroom floors oiled and swept rather than scrubbed and swept?
3. What suggestions for the improvement of all schoolrooms do you gather from
the establishment of open-air schools for the anemic and tubercular?
4. What would you do to provide relaxation and plenty of fresh air on a day so
stormy that children could not go out of doors for recess?
5. What could a teacher do to help a near-sighted boy or girl?
6. Is it safe to trust your feeling that it is too warm or too cold in regulating the
temperature of the room?
7. When do you get your best work, when it is too warm, or when the
thermometer is between 65° and 68° Fahrenheit? (If there is sufficient moisture in
the air, a temperature as low as 65° will not seem colder than a temperature of 70°
when the air carries very little moisture.)
8. What is the reason for using only pencils with large, soft lead or crayons for
writing during the first year?
9. What can a teacher do to protect the community against contagious
diseases?
10. If the school has no playground, what provision would you make for
recreation in the schoolroom?
11. A large percentage of children have decayed teeth; how would you hope to
provide that proper treatment should be given?
12. Why may we not consider health as an individual matter?
13. Why has the teacher a right to demand hygienic conditions in the
schoolroom?
14. Why has the community a right to demand good health as a prerequisite for
teaching?
15. How might teachers hope to secure hygienic conditions for children in their
homes?
16. If a schoolroom needs redecorating on account of improper lighting, or a
new heating and ventilating plant, and the school board does not supply these
necessities, how would you hope to secure such improvements?
CHAPTER XIV
MORAL TRAINING