Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Global Governance From Regional Perspectives A Critical View 1St Edition Triandafyllidou Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Global Governance From Regional Perspectives A Critical View 1St Edition Triandafyllidou Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/high-skill-migration-and-
recession-gendered-perspectives-1st-edition-anna-triandafyllidou/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cross-disciplinary-perspectives-
on-regional-and-global-security-pawel-frankowski/
https://textbookfull.com/product/global-health-and-security-
critical-feminist-perspectives-1st-edition-colleen-omanique/
https://textbookfull.com/product/community-scale-and-regional-
governance-a-postfunctionalist-theory-of-governance-volume-
ii-1st-edition-hooghe/
Global Citizenship Education Critical and International
Perspectives Abdeljalil Akkari
https://textbookfull.com/product/global-citizenship-education-
critical-and-international-perspectives-abdeljalil-akkari/
https://textbookfull.com/product/new-regional-initiatives-in-
chinas-foreign-policy-the-incoming-pluralism-of-global-
governance-1st-edition-matteo-dian/
https://textbookfull.com/product/huawei-goes-global-volume-ii-
regional-geopolitical-perspectives-and-crisis-management-wenxian-
zhang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainability-perspectives-
science-policy-and-practice-a-global-view-of-theories-policies-
and-practice-in-sustainable-development-peter-a-khaiter/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biochar-a-regional-supply-chain-
approach-in-view-of-climate-change-mitigation-1st-edition-viktor-
j-bruckman/
Global Governance from Regional Perspectives
Global Governance from
Regional Perspectives
A Critical View
Edited by
Anna Triandafyllidou
1
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Oxford University Press 2017
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First Edition published in 2017
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2016960543
ISBN 978–0–19–879334–2
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
For my children Dionysis, Iasonas, Kimonas-Demetris, and Alexandros,
cosmopolitan travellers of the twenty-first century
Acknowledgements
Work on this book started in autumn 2013, when Tatjana Evas, then Research
Assistant at the Global Governance Programme of the European University
Institute, came to me to discuss some of her ideas concerning global govern-
ance, law, and a cultural perspective to both. This initial discussion led us to
organize a workshop, which took place on 5–6 December 2013 at the EUI
in Florence. However, this was only a point of departure for a longer journey
that took several rounds of revisions, the introduction of new authors and
chapters, exclusion of others, and a total re-thinking of our arguments in the
light of comments from colleagues in different disciplines including law,
sociology, politics, and history. Indeed, to paraphrase Shakespeare, the course
of true interdisciplinarity never did run smooth. Nonetheless, our, we believe,
risky and innovative endeavour to try and carve out a regional perspective that
is culturally informed and discuss through this lens the question of global
governance—and of global and regional governance institutions/ideas/
discourses/practices—has come to fruition, introducing an innovative view-
point from which to understand global governance (and international
relations) in today’s uncertain and dynamic world.
I would like to acknowledge here the importance of the Global Governance
Programme of the EUI, which provided the intellectual home for this book,
and, of course, all the contributors to this volume for their perseverance
throughout a journey that has lasted more than two years. Many thanks go
to Tatjana Evas for her initial contribution, even if her later professional path
has taken her away from this work. Many thanks to two anonymous reviewers
of Oxford University Press for very constructive criticisms.
Last but not least, this book, like all my scientific work, would not have been
possible without the unconditional support and patience of my husband,
Evgenios, to whom I am always indebted for time ‘stolen’ from him and
the family.
Anna Triandafyllidou
Florence, 7 July 2016
Contents
List of Figures xi
List of Tables xiii
Biographical Notes on Contributors xv
Index 269
x
List of Figures
xvi
Biographical Notes on Contributors
Haram (co-edited with Cedric de Coning and John Karlsrud, Zed books 2016). She is
currently leading the project ‘AU Waging Peace? Explaining the Militarization of the
African Peace and Security Architecture’, in which the concept of militarization and
security practice theory are employed to study militarizing/de-militarizing institutional
discourses and practices.
Jörn-Carsten Gottwald is Professor at Ruhr University Bochum, Germany, where he
holds the Chair of East Asian Politics. He began his academic career as a lecturer in
Chinese Politics at Free University Berlin before working in Comparative Politics at
University Trier and at the Irish Institute of Chinese Studies, National University of
Ireland, Cork. His research and teaching interests in comparative political economy,
China–EU relations, and the governance of financial services have earned him invita-
tions as visiting professor to the China Foreign Affairs University Beijing, Fudan
University Shanghai, University College Dublin, and ESSCA Angers. Recent research
has been published in the Asian Studies Review, ASIEN, East Asia, The International
Journal of China Studies, Integration, and Pacific Focus.
Andrew Hurrell is Montague Burton Professor of International Relations at Oxford
University and a Fellow of Balliol College. He was elected to the British Academy in
2011 and to the Johns Hopkins Society of Scholars in 2010. He is a Delegate of Oxford
University Press and a member of the Finance Committee (the board of the company).
His research interests cover theories of international relations; theories of global gov-
ernance; the history of thought on international relations; comparative regionalism
and regional powers; and the international relations of the Americas, with particular
reference to Brazil. His current work focuses on the history of the globalization of
international society and the implications for twenty-first-century global order. He is
completing a short introduction to global governance. Publications include On Global
Order. Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society (Oxford University Press
2008), which was the winner of the International Studies Association Prize for Best
Book in the field of International Relations in 2009; (with Ngaire Woods), Inequality,
Globalization and World Politics (1999); and (with Louise Fawcett), Regionalism in World
Politics (1995).
José Antonio Sanahuja is a Full Professor of International Relations at the Sociology
and Political Science School of the Complutense University of Madrid, Spain and a
Research Fellow at Complutense Institute of International Studies (ICEI). He has carried
out research and consultancy work with the European Parliament Directorate of
Research, the European Commission (DG-RELEX), the UNDP, the Ibero-American
General Secretary (SEGIB), the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation,
and a number of Spanish and international NGOs and research centres. For two terms
he served as an independent expert of the Development Cooperation Council, an
advisory body of the Spanish Department of International Development Cooperation.
He is a member of the board of Oxfam Intermón, the Spanish affiliate of Oxfam
International. Among his more recent books are: Teorías de las Relaciones Internacionales
(with C. Arenal, 2015); and Construcción de la paz, seguridad y desarrollo. Visiones,
políticas y actores (2012). He is also a member of the editorial board of the journals
xvii
Biographical Notes on Contributors
xviii
Biographical Notes on Contributors
xix
Part I
Critical Approaches to
Global Governance
1
Anna Triandafyllidou
1.1 Introduction
The notion of global governance has attracted significant attention during the
last two decades but remains notoriously elusive. The term ‘global’ has been
adopted to point to the emerging transnational world order and interactions
that go beyond traditional state actors which have been the focus of inter-
national relations since the 1990s. Similarly, the term ‘governance’ goes beyond
government to designate the interaction and networking between public and
private actors, both in horizontal (non-hierarchical) and vertical (hierarchical)
ways. These actors are not only states but also include civil society and formal
and informal networks of various kinds.
Governance typically involves cooperation, negotiation, and regulation.
Global governance activity may occur at the national and subnational level,
but can have consequences at the transnational level; likewise, it may occur at
the transnational level and have implications for the national. Unlike govern-
ment, governance does not have a clear polity to which it refers, as its contours
usually trespass those of the state. Thus, governance has no clear democratic
legitimacy, although it may have a strong efficiency legitimacy as it contrib-
utes to developing satisfactory solutions to complex problems. It is also seen as
a better fit for contemporary societies, as it enables actors such as the private
sector or civil society, which are quick to act and provide more timely infor-
mation, to make up for the lacunae of state action that involves longer time-
frames for response and less flexibility.
Anna Triandafyllidou
4
Global Governance from Regional Perspectives
5
Anna Triandafyllidou
elites as such). Thus, we engage with Africa, Latin America, and of course
Europe as world regions even if their level of regional organization and par-
ticipation in global governance differs. The European Union, which, as Chris-
tiansen in this volume acknowledges, is only a partial expression of what is
understood as Europe writ large, has perhaps the most developed institutional
make-up and engages clearly with global issues and global governance insti-
tutions as a regional actor. However, Africa and Latin America have their own
regional institutions which do adopt regional cultural perspectives, as argued
by Tieku and Gelot, and by Sanahuja in this volume. Such perspectives contest
western dominance in global governance both culturally (Africa) and in terms
of distribution of power and a realist world order (Latin America). They also
both point to the need for a ‘southern’ perspective on global governance.
However, in the workshop that preceded this volume it became clear that it
would be difficult to speak of a Eurasian regional perspective or an Asian or
South East Asian one. Hence we have opted for country-specific chapters on
Russia and China. The same was true for a North American perspective as
opposed to a US-specific viewpoint. It was felt that these three countries are
important global players (both in terms of how they perceive themselves
and how they are perceived by others) and engage in different ways with
global issues and global governance structures. We further elaborate on
these different perspectives and on the national vs regional register as an
appropriate approach for analysing global governance in the concluding
chapter of this volume.
The aim of this introductory chapter is to place the book in its historical
context of the early twenty-first century; to provide for working definitions
and discuss the contested nature of global governance, thus clarifying our
analytical framework; and to offer an example of how cultural perspectives
and their power connotations can be disguised and become ‘invisible’ in the
theory and practice of global governance. The chapter concludes with an
explanation of the choice of regions and countries included here and an
outline of the contents of this book.
6
Global Governance from Regional Perspectives
It has been more than twenty years since Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the
end of history (Fukuyama 1989, 2006). Indeed it was not only Fukuyama who
thought that the failure of Soviet Communism signalled the end of a dialect-
ical relationship between different conceptions of progress, politics, and a
good society. Capitalism and a free market liberal democracy were greeted
by political elites on both sides of the Atlantic as the good political and
economic system. From then on, it was believed, human history would be a
linear path without any significant ideological conflicts. While Fukuyama did
not necessarily mean that people were happier or better off thanks to historical
‘progress’, he argued that history as a coherent intelligible process had come to
an end and liberal democracy had affirmed itself as the form of government.
While several international crises marked the 1990s (the first Gulf War, the
break-up of Yugoslavia, the bankruptcy of Argentina, the Oslo Agreements,
the Wadi Araba Agreement of peace between Jordan and Israel, the Kosovo
War), it was perhaps 9/11 and the emergence of international terrorism that
began to shake the grounds of this vision that ideological conflict had ended.
Indeed, even though the global order was no longer about two opposed poles
of power, history had not come to an end as Fukuyama had argued; rather, it
was actually (re-)started. Nonetheless, American hegemony over the world,
which was further re-affirmed through the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001
(after the events of 9/11) and the Second Gulf War and invasion of Iraq (2003),
and the quasi-unilateralism that it managed to impose, disguised this process.
The development and activities of international terrorist networks of course
marred the view of this new harmonious global order, but they were also seen
as a necessary evil, a marginal aberration of an otherwise successful and
hegemonic international system. Of course, terrorism is not a new phenom-
enon, what was new was the transnational nature of these networks and their
thus contestation of western hegemony.
Along with jihadist terrorism, there were two concomitant processes which
took place peacefully and discreetly, and yet profoundly destabilized the ‘end
of history’ narrative and the hegemony of the United States. The first was the
rise of new global economic powers, indeed, a phenomenon that has affirmed
itself most forcefully during the last decade with the rise of China, India, and
Brazil as global economic powerhouses. The second and closely related phenom-
enon was the range of regional integration processes that developed or further
reaffirmed themselves in various regions, including Latin America, Africa, and
Asia, alongside deeper economic if not political integration in Europe.
The international system has had to reinvent itself, replacing the former G7
and G8, which was largely western dominated, with the more open and
multilateral G20 forum. At the same time, rising global powers such as
China, India, and Brazil have also had to rethink their roles and reorient
themselves from actors that were primarily concerned with their internal
7
Anna Triandafyllidou
8
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
the brain at this period of life leads to an early death, while children
affected with partial atrophy may continue to live, though almost
always in a state of idiocy. The forms mostly observed in children are
unilateral or bilateral atrophy of the cerebrum, partial or almost entire
absence of the cerebellum, imperfect development of the large
cerebral ganglia, and slight partial atrophy of the medulla oblongata.
The large commissures as well as the crura cerebri are very seldom
found atrophied.
The most frequent and, from a practical point of view, the most
important of these forms is the unilateral atrophy of the cerebrum, for
the reason that in a mild form it is to a certain degree consistent with
the mental and physical development of the child. It is mostly found
on the left side. In some cases the atrophy extends evenly
throughout the hemisphere, while in others it affects more or less
one or the other lobe. The loss in the bulk of the hemisphere may
amount to only a slight diminution, or to as much as to one-half of
the normal size. Its thickness above the ventricle may be reduced to
a few millimeters; in some cases even the membranes of the brain
may lie in contact with the ependyma. The ventricle of the atrophied
hemisphere is almost always enlarged. The convolutions of the
cerebrum are very narrow, sometimes quite indistinct. One or both of
the corpora striata also are generally found atrophied. In many cases
even the atrophy extends to one of the crura cerebri and to the
pyramid of the same side, and to the anterior and lateral columns of
the spinal cord on the opposite side. Frequently, one or the other
lateral half of the cerebellum also is found affected. The condition of
the substance of the cerebrum is nearly the same as in the senile
atrophy of the brain to be described hereafter. The skull is mostly
thickened on the side of the atrophy, and frequently asymmetrical.
In senile atrophy of the brain, which represents the most simple form
of total atrophy of this organ, the first symptoms frequently appear
toward the end of some intercurrent disease. They consist in a very
slow and gradually increasing derangement of the cerebral functions,
associated with a general loss of innervation, manifesting itself by
talkative wanderings of the mind, restless sleep, hallucinations,
foolish activity, attacks of tremor senilis, etc. The intellectual
functions diminish and the memory is lost. The physical forces also
gradually sink, the tremor senilis increases, and the patient, no more
able to walk, becomes confined to bed. Finally, a relaxation of the
sphincters takes place, and death is produced by the disturbance of
the automatic functions of deglutition and respiration.
Introduction.
11 Archiv. de Physiologie, 1871-72, p. 319; also to his “Leçons sur le Syphilis hered.,”
Progrès méd., 1877 and 1878.
14 Ibid., p. 14.
The fact that nervous syphilis may occur many years after the
cessation of all apparent evidences of the diathesis is of great
practical importance, especially as the nervous system is more
prone to be attacked when the secondaries have been very light
than when the earlier manifestations have been severe. I have
repeatedly seen nervous syphilis in persons whose secondaries
have been so slight as to have been entirely overlooked or forgotten,
and who honestly asserted that they never had had syphilis,
although they acknowledged to gonorrhœa or to repeated exposure,
and confessed that their asserted exemption was due to good
fortune rather than to chastity.
33 Ibid.
34 Ibid.