Download textbook Human Aspects Of It For The Aged Population Aging Design And User Experience Third International Conference Itap 2017 Held As Part Of Hci International 2017 Vancouver Bc Canada July 9 14 2017 Proceedi ebook all chapter pdf

Human Aspects of IT for the Aged
Population Aging Design and User

Experience Third International
Conference ITAP 2017 Held as Part of
HCI International 2017 Vancouver BC
Canada July 9 14 2017 Proceedings
Part I 1st Edition Jia Zhou
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/human-aspects-of-it-for-the-aged-population-aging-de
sign-and-user-experience-third-international-conference-itap-2017-held-as-part-of-hci-
international-2017-vancouver-bc-canada-july-9-14-2017-proceedi/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
Design User Experience and Usability Theory Methodology

and Management 6th International Conference DUXU 2017
Held as Part of HCI International 2017 Vancouver BC
Canada July 9 14 2017 Proceedings Part I 1st Edition
Aaron Marcus
https://textbookfull.com/product/design-user-experience-and-
usability-theory-methodology-and-management-6th-international-
conference-duxu-2017-held-as-part-of-hci-
international-2017-vancouver-bc-canada-
july-9-14-2017-proceedings-part/
Design User Experience and Usability Designing
Pleasurable Experiences 6th International Conference
DUXU 2017 Held as Part of HCI International 2017
Vancouver BC Canada July 9 14 2017 Proceedings Part II
1st Edition Aaron Marcus
usability-designing-pleasurable-experiences-6th-international-
Design User Experience and Usability Understanding
Users and Contexts 6th International Conference DUXU
2017 Held as Part of HCI International 2017 Vancouver
BC Canada July 9 14 2017 Proceedings Part III 1st
Edition Aaron Marcus
usability-understanding-users-and-contexts-6th-international-
Social Computing and Social Media Human Behavior 9th
International Conference SCSM 2017 Held as Part of HCI
International 2017 Vancouver BC Canada July 9 14 2017
Proceedings Part I 1st Edition Gabriele Meiselwitz
(Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/social-computing-and-social-
media-human-behavior-9th-international-conference-scsm-2017-held-
as-part-of-hci-international-2017-vancouver-bc-canada-
Learning and Collaboration Technologies Novel Learning
Ecosystems 4th International Conference LCT 2017 Held
as Part of HCI International 2017 Vancouver BC Canada
July 9 14 2017 Proceedings Part I 1st Edition
Panayiotis Zaphiris
https://textbookfull.com/product/learning-and-collaboration-
technologies-novel-learning-ecosystems-4th-international-
conference-lct-2017-held-as-part-of-hci-
july-9-14-2017-proceedings-part-i-1st/
Augmented Cognition Neurocognition and Machine Learning
11th International Conference AC 2017 Held as Part of
HCI International 2017 Vancouver BC Canada July 9 14
2017 Proceedings Part I 1st Edition Dylan D. Schmorrow
https://textbookfull.com/product/augmented-cognition-
neurocognition-and-machine-learning-11th-international-
conference-ac-2017-held-as-part-of-hci-
july-9-14-2017-proceedings-part-i-1st-edition-d/
Virtual Augmented and Mixed Reality 9th International
Conference VAMR 2017 Held as Part of HCI International
2017 Vancouver BC Canada July 9 14 2017 Proceedings 1st
Edition Stephanie Lackey
https://textbookfull.com/product/virtual-augmented-and-mixed-
reality-9th-international-conference-vamr-2017-held-as-part-of-
hci-international-2017-vancouver-bc-canada-
july-9-14-2017-proceedings-1st-edition-stephanie-lackey/
Distributed Ambient and Pervasive Interactions 5th

International Conference DAPI 2017 Held as Part of HCI
International 2017 Vancouver BC Canada July 9 14 2017
Proceedings 1st Edition Norbert Streitz
https://textbookfull.com/product/distributed-ambient-and-
pervasive-interactions-5th-international-conference-
dapi-2017-held-as-part-of-hci-international-2017-vancouver-bc-
canada-july-9-14-2017-proceedings-1st-edition-norbert-streitz/
Human Computer Interaction User Interface Design

Development and Multimodality 19th International
Conference HCI International 2017 Vancouver BC Canada
July 9 14 2017 Proceedings Part I 1st Edition Masaaki
Kurosu (Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/human-computer-interaction-user-
interface-design-development-and-multimodality-19th-
international-conference-hci-international-2017-vancouver-bc-
Jia Zhou
Gavriel Salvendy (Eds.)
Human Aspects of IT
LNCS 10297
for the Aged Population

Aging, Design and User Experience
Third International Conference, ITAP 2017
Held as Part of HCI International 2017
Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9–14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I
123
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10297
Commenced Publication in 1973
Founding and Former Series Editors:
Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, and Jan van Leeuwen
Editorial Board
David Hutchison
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
Takeo Kanade
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Josef Kittler
University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Jon M. Kleinberg
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Friedemann Mattern
ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
John C. Mitchell
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Moni Naor
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
C. Pandu Rangan
Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India
Bernhard Steffen
TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
Demetri Terzopoulos
University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Doug Tygar
University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Gerhard Weikum
Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbrücken, Germany
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7409
Jia Zhou Gavriel Salvendy (Eds.)
•
Human Aspects of IT
for the Aged Population
Aging, Design and User Experience
Third International Conference, ITAP 2017
Held as Part of HCI International 2017
Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9–14, 2017
Proceedings, Part I
123
Editors
Jia Zhou Gavriel Salvendy
Chongqing University Purdue University
Chongqing West Lafayette
China USA
and
Tsinghua University
Beijing
P.R. China
and
University of Central Florida
Orlando
USA
ISSN 0302-9743 ISSN 1611-3349 (electronic)

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
ISBN 978-3-319-58529-1 ISBN 978-3-319-58530-7 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017939345
LNCS Sublibrary: SL3 – Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the
material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation,
broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information
storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are
believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors
give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or
omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
Printed on acid-free paper
This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature

The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Foreword
The 19th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, HCI International

2017, was held in Vancouver, Canada, during July 9–14, 2017. The event incorporated
the 15 conferences/thematic areas listed on the following page.
A total of 4,340 individuals from academia, research institutes, industry, and gov-
ernmental agencies from 70 countries submitted contributions, and 1,228 papers have
been included in the proceedings. These papers address the latest research and
development efforts and highlight the human aspects of design and use of computing
systems. The papers thoroughly cover the entire field of human–computer interaction,
addressing major advances in knowledge and effective use of computers in a variety of
application areas. The volumes constituting the full set of the conference proceedings
are listed on the following pages.
I would like to thank the program board chairs and the members of the program
boards of all thematic areas and affiliated conferences for their contribution to the
highest scientific quality and the overall success of the HCI International 2017
conference.
This conference would not have been possible without the continuous and unwa-
vering support and advice of the founder, Conference General Chair Emeritus and
Conference Scientific Advisor Prof. Gavriel Salvendy. For his outstanding efforts,
I would like to express my appreciation to the communications chair and editor of HCI
International News, Dr. Abbas Moallem.
April 2017 Constantine Stephanidis

HCI International 2017 Thematic Areas
and Affiliated Conferences
Thematic areas:
• Human–Computer Interaction (HCI 2017)
• Human Interface and the Management of Information (HIMI 2017)
Affiliated conferences:
• 17th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergo-
nomics (EPCE 2017)
• 11th International Conference on Universal Access in Human–Computer Interac-
tion (UAHCI 2017)
• 9th International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (VAMR
2017)
• 9th International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design (CCD 2017)
• 9th International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media (SCSM 2017)
• 11th International Conference on Augmented Cognition (AC 2017)
• 8th International Conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applications in
Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management (DHM 2017)
• 6th International Conference on Design, User Experience and Usability (DUXU
2017)
• 5th International Conference on Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions
(DAPI 2017)
• 5th International Conference on Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy
and Trust (HAS 2017)
• 4th International Conference on HCI in Business, Government and Organizations
(HCIBGO 2017)
• 4th International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies (LCT
2017)
• Third International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population
(ITAP 2017)
Conference Proceedings Volumes Full List
1. LNCS 10271, Human–Computer Interaction: User Interface Design, Development

and Multimodality (Part I), edited by Masaaki Kurosu
2. LNCS 10272 Human–Computer Interaction: Interaction Contexts (Part II), edited
by Masaaki Kurosu
3. LNCS 10273, Human Interface and the Management of Information: Information,
Knowledge and Interaction Design (Part I), edited by Sakae Yamamoto
4. LNCS 10274, Human Interface and the Management of Information: Supporting
Learning, Decision-Making and Collaboration (Part II), edited by Sakae
Yamamoto
5. LNAI 10275, Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Performance,
Emotion and Situation Awareness (Part I), edited by Don Harris
6. LNAI 10276, Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Cognition and
Design (Part II), edited by Don Harris
7. LNCS 10277, Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction: Design and
Development Approaches and Methods (Part I), edited by Margherita Antona and
Constantine Stephanidis
8. LNCS 10278, Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction: Designing
Novel Interactions (Part II), edited by Margherita Antona and Constantine
Stephanidis
9. LNCS 10279, Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction: Human and
Technological Environments (Part III), edited by Margherita Antona and
10. LNCS 10280, Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, edited by Stephanie Lackey
and Jessie Y.C. Chen
11. LNCS 10281, Cross-Cultural Design, edited by Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
12. LNCS 10282, Social Computing and Social Media: Human Behavior (Part I),
edited by Gabriele Meiselwitz
13. LNCS 10283, Social Computing and Social Media: Applications and Analytics
(Part II), edited by Gabriele Meiselwitz
14. LNAI 10284, Augmented Cognition: Neurocognition and Machine Learning
(Part I), edited by Dylan D. Schmorrow and Cali M. Fidopiastis
15. LNAI 10285, Augmented Cognition: Enhancing Cognition and Behavior in
Complex Human Environments (Part II), edited by Dylan D. Schmorrow and
Cali M. Fidopiastis
16. LNCS 10286, Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety,
Ergonomics and Risk Management: Ergonomics and Design (Part I), edited by
Vincent G. Duffy
17. LNCS 10287, Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety,
Ergonomics and Risk Management: Health and Safety (Part II), edited by
Vincent G. Duffy
18. LNCS 10288, Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory, Methodology and
Management (Part I), edited by Aaron Marcus and Wentao Wang
X Conference Proceedings Volumes Full List
19. LNCS 10289, Design, User Experience, and Usability: Designing Pleasurable
Experiences (Part II), edited by Aaron Marcus and Wentao Wang
20. LNCS 10290, Design, User Experience, and Usability: Understanding Users and
Contexts (Part III), edited by Aaron Marcus and Wentao Wang
21. LNCS 10291, Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions, edited by Norbert
Streitz and Panos Markopoulos
22. LNCS 10292, Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy and Trust, edited
by Theo Tryfonas
23. LNCS 10293, HCI in Business, Government and Organizations: Interacting with
Information Systems (Part I), edited by Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah and Chuan-Hoo Tan
24. LNCS 10294, HCI in Business, Government and Organizations: Supporting
Business (Part II), edited by Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah and Chuan-Hoo Tan
25. LNCS 10295, Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Novel Learning
Ecosystems (Part I), edited by Panayiotis Zaphiris and Andri Ioannou
26. LNCS 10296, Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Technology in Education
(Part II), edited by Panayiotis Zaphiris and Andri Ioannou
27. LNCS 10297, Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population: Aging, Design and
User Experience (Part I), edited by Jia Zhou and Gavriel Salvendy
28. LNCS 10298, Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population: Applications, Ser-
vices and Contexts (Part II), edited by Jia Zhou and Gavriel Salvendy
29. CCIS 713, HCI International 2017 Posters Proceedings (Part I), edited by
30. CCIS 714, HCI International 2017 Posters Proceedings (Part II), edited by
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population
Program Board Chair(s): Gavriel Salvendy, USA and P.R. China,

and Jia Zhou, P.R. China
• Panagiotis Bamidis, Greece • Eugene Loos, The Netherlands

• Marc-Eric Bobillier Chaumon, France • Lourdes Moreno Lopez, Spain
• Julie A. Brown, USA • Lisa J. Molnar, USA
• Alan H.S. Chan, Hong Kong, • Natalie Pang, Singapore
SAR China • Andraž Petrovčič, Slovenia
• Neil Charness, USA • Marie Sjölinder, Sweden
• Shelia Cotten, USA • Alvaro Taveira, USA
• Hua Dong, P.R. China • António Teixeira, Portugal
• Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol, Spain • Wang-Chin Tsai, Taiwan
• M. Anwar Hossain, Saudi Arabia • Gregg C. Vanderheiden, USA
• Yong Gu Ji, Korea • Brenda Vrkljan, Canada
• Jiunn-Woei (Allen) Lian, Taiwan • Martina Ziefle, Germany
• Hai-Ning Liang, P.R. China
The full list with the Program Board Chairs and the members of the Program Boards of
all thematic areas and affiliated conferences is available online at:
http://www.hci.international/board-members-2017.php
HCI International 2018
The 20th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, HCI International

2018, will be held jointly with the affiliated conferences in Las Vegas, NV, USA, at
Caesars Palace, July 15–20, 2018. It will cover a broad spectrum of themes related to
human–computer interaction, including theoretical issues, methods, tools, processes,
and case studies in HCI design, as well as novel interaction techniques, interfaces, and
applications. The proceedings will be published by Springer. More information is
available on the conference website: http://2018.hci.international/.
General Chair
Prof. Constantine Stephanidis
University of Crete and ICS-FORTH
Heraklion, Crete, Greece
E-mail: general_chair@hcii2018.org
http://2018.hci.international/
Contents – Part I
Aging and Technology Acceptance
Age Differences in Acceptance of Self-driving Cars:

A Survey of Perceptions and Attitudes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Chaiwoo Lee, Carley Ward, Martina Raue, Lisa D’Ambrosio,
and Joseph F. Coughlin
Mobile Technology Adoption Among Older People - An Exploratory Study

in the UK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Jing Pan, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Hua Dong
Everyday Life Interactions of Women 60+ with ICTs:

Creations of Meaning and Negotiations of Identity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Barbara Ratzenböck
Privacy, Data Security, and the Acceptance of AAL-Systems –

A User-Specific Perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Julia van Heek, Simon Himmel, and Martina Ziefle
Domestic Robots for Homecare: A Technology Acceptance Perspective. . . . . 57

Martina Ziefle and André Calero Valdez
User-Centred Design for the Elderly
Co-creation Methods: Informing Technology Solutions for Older Adults . . . . 77

Lupin Battersby, Mei Lan Fang, Sarah L. Canham, Judith Sixsmith,
Sylvain Moreno, and Andrew Sixsmith
Addressing Issues of Need, Adaptability, User Acceptability and Ethics

in the Participatory Design of New Technology Enabling Wellness,
Independence and Dignity for Seniors Living in Residential Homes . . . . . . . 90
Joan Cahill, Sean McLoughlin, Michael O’Connor, Melissa Stolberg,
and Sean Wetherall
Towards Accessible Automatically Generated Interfaces Part 2:

Study with Model-Based Self-voicing Interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
J. Bern Jordan and Gregg C. Vanderheiden
Towards Accessible Automatically Generated Interfaces Part 1: An Input

Model that Bridges the Needs of Users and Product Functionality. . . . . . . . . 129
J. Bern Jordan and Gregg C. Vanderheiden
XVI Contents – Part I
Representing Meaning in User Experience by Visualizing Empirical Data . . . 147

Eui Chul Jung and Eun Jeong Kim
A Study on Interactive Explanation Boards Design and Evaluation

for Active Aging Ecotourism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
Li-Shu Lu
A Pyramid Model of Inclusive Design to Get Outdoors for China’s

Ageing People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
Guoying Lu and Ting Zhang
Using Care Professionals as Proxies in the Design Process of Welfare

Technology – Perspectives from Municipality Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
Marie Sjölinder, Isabella Scandurra, Anneli Avatare Nou,
and Ella Kolkowska
Technology Experience Café—Enabling Technology–Driven Social

Innovation for an Ageing Society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
Johannes Tröger, João Mariano, Sibila Marques, Joana Mendonça,
Andrey Girenko, Jan Alexandersson, Bernard Stree, Michele Lamanna,
Maurizio Lorenzatto, Louise Pierrel Mikkelsen,
and Uffe Bundgård-Jørgensen
Research on Age-Adaptive Design of Information Interaction Based

on Physiological Characteristics of the Aged . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
Ming Zhou and Yajun Li
Product Design for the Elderly
Study on PSD Model with FAHP Method in the Product Design

for Older Adults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
Yongyan Guo and Minggang Yang
User Experience Design Research of New Types of Home Appliances

Based on the Analysis of the Learning Curve of the Elderly. . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
Bin Jiang, Lili Tian, and Di Zhou
Analysis and Study on the Furniture Used by the Aging Population

Based on the Quality of Sleep . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244
Bin Jiang, Hui Niu, and Di Zhou
A Sensory Emotion Data System for Designing Information Appliances . . . . 255

Yan Jin, Long Xu, and Sangwon Lee
Users’ Affective Response to Furniture Design Based on Public Openness . . . 264

Yein Jo, Jeebin Yim, Hyeonsu Park, and Younah Kang
Contents – Part I XVII
Emotions in Material Surfaces for Product Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275

Donghwan Kim, Yun Jae Lee, Jiwon Kim, Hyerin Park, Min Hee Shin,
Ji Hyun Lim, Choeun Kim, Taezoon Park, and Wonil Hwang
Study on the Product Packaging Color Identification of Elder Men

and Elder Women . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
Jiajie Lyu and Delai Men
Research on the Design of Smart Pension Product Modeling Based

on Brand Image . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
Xinxin Zhang, Minggang Yang, and Yan Zhou
Aging and User Experience
Acoustical Evaluation of Soundscape in Urban Spaces Along

Traffic Corridor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319
Wei Lin, Wei-Hwa Chiang, Hsuan Lin, and Yi-Run Chen
Elderly Using Innovative Gesture Design of Satisfaction Performance . . . . . . 330

Shuo Fang Liu and Ming Hong Wang
A Study of Usability on Internet Map Website . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339

Kuang-Chih Lo and Wang-Chin Tsai
How to Enhance Intergenerational Communication? The Influence

of Family Orientation and Generation When Using Social Robots
as an Intermediary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
Fan Mo, Jia Zhou, and Shuping Yi
Factors in Fraudulent Emails that Deceive Elderly People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360

Jean-Robert Nino, Gustav Enström, and Alan R. Davidson
Silent Speech Interaction for Ambient Assisted Living Scenarios . . . . . . . . . 369

António Teixeira, Nuno Vitor, João Freitas, and Samuel Silva
A Pilot Interface Evaluation Combined with Three-Dimensional

Holography Concept for the Older Adults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388
Wang-Chin Tsai, Cheng-Min Tsai, Hui-Jiun Hu, and Kuang-Chih Lo
Personalized Computer Access for People with Severe Motor Disabilities:

AsTeRICS, FlipMouse and the Two-Level Personalization Software
Engineering Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397
Chris Veigl, Martin Deinhofer, Benjamin Aigner,
and Klaus Miesenberger
XVIII Contents – Part I
Digital Literacy and Training
The Positive and Negative Impact of an Intergenerational Digital

Technology Education Programme on Younger People’s Perceptions
of Older Adults. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419
Lisbeth Drury, Ania Bobrowicz, Lindsey Cameron, and Dominic Abrams
Playful Method for Seniors to Embrace Information Technology. . . . . . . . . . 429

Jeanette Eriksson
Eliciting Best Practices in Digital Literacy Tutoring: A Cognitive Task

Analysis Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447
Kelly S. Steelman, Kay L. Tislar, Leo C. Ureel II, and Charles Wallace
Gamification on Senior Citizen’s Information Technology Learning:

The Mediator Role of Intrinsic Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 461
Kai Sun, Lingyun Qiu, and Meiyun Zuo
The Study of Teaching the Smartphone Using in Taiwan’s Elderly

Population—A Case Study in Learners of the Senior Citizens Academy
in a City of Taiwan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477
Ming-Wei Wang
How to Guide the Use of Technology for Ageing-in-Place?

An Evidence-Based Educational Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486
Eveline J.M. Wouters, Marianne E. Nieboer, Kirsten A. Nieboer,
Marijke J.G.A. Moonen, Sebastiaan T.M. Peek,
Anne-Mie A.G. Sponselee, Joost van Hoof, Claire S. van der Voort,
and Katrien G. Luijkx
Exploring the Elders’ Information Needs on Home-Based Care:

A Community Service Perspective. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 498
Zhizheng Zhang and Yajun Li
Author Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511

Contents – Part II
Mobile and Wearable Interaction for the Elderly
How Do Users Interact with Mobile Devices? An Analysis of Handheld

Positions for Different Technology Generations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Christina Bröhl, Alexander Mertens, and Martina Ziefle
Movement Analysis for Improving Older Adults’ Performances in HCI:

Preliminary Analysis of Movements of the Users’ Wrists During
Tactile Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Lilian Genaro Motti Ader, Nadine Vigouroux, and Philippe Gorce
Investigation into the Discrepancies Between Writing on Paper

and Writing on a Touchscreen Device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Yu-Chen Hsieh, Ke Jia Hung, and Hsuan Lin
A Conceptual Design for a Smart Photo Album Catered to the Elderly . . . . . 42

Hui-Jiun Hu, Pei-Fen Wu, and Wang-Chin Tsai
Development of a User Experience Evaluation Framework

for Wearable Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Young Woo Kim, Sol Hee Yoon, Hwan Hwangbo, and Yong Gu Ji
A Field Experiment on Capabilities Involved in Mobile Navigation Task . . . . 68

Qingchuan Li and Yan Luximon
Shape Design and Exploration of 2D and 3D Graphical Icons . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Hsuan Lin, Yu-Chen Hsieh, and Wei Lin
The Effects of the Transparency of the Guiding Diagrams on the Phone

Interface for the Elderly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Shuo Fang Liu, Po Yen Lin, and Ming Hong Wang
Aging and Social Media
Exploring Storytelling for Digital Memorialization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

Grace Ataguba, Samantha Penrice, and John Shearer
My Interests, My Activities: Learning from an Intergenerational

Comparison of Smartwatch Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol and Andrea Rosales
XX Contents – Part II
Understanding the Motivations of Online Community Users -

A Comparison Between Younger and Older People. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
Jiunn-Woei Lian
Visual Representations of Digital Connectivity in Everyday Life. . . . . . . . . . 138

Wendy Martin and Katy Pilcher
Novel Functional Technologies for Age-Friendly E-commerce . . . . . . . . . . . 150

Xiaohai Tian, Lei Meng, Siyuan Liu, Zhiqi Shen, Eng-Siong Chng,
Cyril Leung, Frank Guan, and Chunyan Miao
Participatory Human-Centered Design of a Feedback Mechanism

Within the Historytelling System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
Torben Volkmann, Michael Sengpiel, and Nicole Jochems
Research on New Media Usage Behaviors, Influencing Factors

and Social Contact Mode of the Elderly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
Minggang Yang, Mingliang Dou, and Yinan Han
Online Privacy Perceptions of Older Adults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181

Eva-Maria Zeissig, Chantal Lidynia, Luisa Vervier, Andera Gadeib,
and Martina Ziefle
Examining the Factors Influencing Elders’ Knowledge Sharing Behavior

in Virtual Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
Xuanhui Zhang and Xiaokang Song
Silver and Intergenerational Gaming
Digital Gaming Perceptions Among Older Adult Non-gamers . . . . . . . . . . . . 217

Julie A. Brown
My Grandpa and I “Gotta Catch ‘Em All.” A Research Design

on Intergenerational Gaming Focusing on Pokémon Go . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
Francesca Comunello and Simone Mulargia
Socioemotional Benefits of Digital Games for Older Adults . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242

David Kaufman
Exergaming: Meaningful Play for Older Adults? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254

Eugène Loos
Pass the Control(ler): Shifting of Power in Families Through

Intergenerational Gaming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266
Sanela Osmanovic and Loretta Pecchioni
Contents – Part II XXI
A Mature Kind of Fun? Exploring Silver Gamers’ Motivation to Play

Casual Games – Results from a Large-Scale Online Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
Daniel Possler, Christoph Klimmt, Daniela Schlütz,
and Jonas Walkenbach
Employing a User-Centered Design Process to Create a Multiplayer

Online Escape Game for Older Adults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
Fan Zhang, Amir Doroudian, David Kaufman, Simone Hausknecht,
Julija Jeremic, and Hollis Owens
Social Interaction Between Older Adults (80+) and Younger People

During Intergenerational Digital Gameplay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
Fan Zhang, Robyn Schell, David Kaufman, Glaucia Salgado,
and Julija Jeremic
Health Care and Assistive Technologies and Services for the Elderly
Distributed User Interfaces for Poppelreuters and Raven Visual Tests . . . . . . 325
Pedro Cruz Caballero, Amilcar Meneses-Viveros, Erika Hernández-Rubio,
and Oscar Zamora Arévalo
Adaptation of the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST)

for IoT Telemedicine Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
George E. Dafoulas, Georgios Pierris, Santiago Martinez,
Lise Kvistgaard Jensen, and Kristian Kidholm
Harvesting Assistive Technology Vocabularies: Methods and Results

from a Pilot Study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350
Yao Ding, J. Bern Jordan, and Gregg C. Vanderheiden
Understanding Acceptance Factors for Using e-care Systems and Devices:

Insights from a Mixed-Method Intervention Study in Slovenia . . . . . . . . . . . 362
Vesna Dolničar, Andraž Petrovčič, Mojca Šetinc, Igor Košir,
and Matic Kavčič
Sensor-Driven Detection of Social Isolation

in Community-Dwelling Elderly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378
Nadee Goonawardene, XiaoPing Toh, and Hwee-Pink Tan
Understanding Middle-Aged and Elderly Taiwanese People’s Acceptance

of the Personal Health Information System for Self-health Management . . . . . 393
Pi-Jung Hsieh, Hui-Min Lai, Hsuan-Chi Ku, and Wen-Tsung Ku
To Capture the Diverse Needs of Welfare Technology

Stakeholders – Evaluation of a Value Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404
Ella Kolkowska, Anneli Avatare Nöu, Marie Sjölinder,
and Isabella Scandurra
XXII Contents – Part II
Technology and Service Usage Among Family Caregivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420

Chaiwoo Lee, Carley Ward, Dana Ellis, Samantha Brady,
Lisa D’Ambrosio, and Joseph F. Coughlin
Change in the Relationship Between the Elderly and Information Support

Robot System Living Together . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433
Misato Nihei, Yuko Nishiura, Ikuko Mamiya, Hiroaki Kojima,
Ken Sadohara, Shinichi Ohnaka, Minoru Kamata, and Takenobu Inoue
Digital Storytelling and Dementia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 443

Elly Park, Hollis Owens, David Kaufman, and Lili Liu
From Noticing to Suspecting: The Initial Stages in the Information

Behaviour of Informal Caregivers of People with Dementia . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452
Ágústa Pálsdóttir
Usability Evaluation on User Interface of Electronic Wheelchair . . . . . . . . . . 467

Cheng-Min Tsai, Chih-Kuan Lin, Sing Li, and Wang-Chin Tsai
Fall Detection Based on Skeleton Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475

Tao Xu and Yun Zhou
Aging and Learning, Working and Leisure
The STAGE Project: Tailored Cultural Entertainment for Older Adults

via Streaming Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487
Luigi Biocca, Nicolò Paraciani, Francesca Picenni, Giovanni Caruso,
Marco Padula, Riccardo Chiariglione, Agnieszka Kowalska,
Monica Florea, and Ilias Kapouranis
Facilitating Remote Communication Between Senior Communities

with Telepresence Robots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501
Atsushi Hiyama, Akihiro Kosugi, Kentarou Fukuda,
Masatomo Kobayashi, and Michitaka Hirose
Reopening the Black Box of Career Age and Research Performance . . . . . . . 516
Chien Hsiang Liao
Intergenerational Techno-Creative Activities in a Library Fablab . . . . . . . . . . 526

Margarida Romero and Benjamin Lille
‘Industrie 4.0’ and an Aging Workforce – A Discussion from

a Psychological and a Managerial Perspective. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537
Matthias Schinner, André Calero Valdez, Elisabeth Noll,
Anne Kathrin Schaar, Peter Letmathe, and Martina Ziefle
Contents – Part II XXIII
Towards Extracting Recruiters’ Tacit Knowledge Based on Interactions

with a Job Matching System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557
Kaoru Shinkawa, Kenichi Saito, Masatomo Kobayashi,
and Atsuhi Hiyama
The Influence of Mental Model Similarity on User Performance:

Comparing Older and Younger Adults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 569
Bingjun Xie and Jia Zhou
Author Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 581

Aging and Technology Acceptance
Age Differences in Acceptance of Self-driving
Cars: A Survey of Perceptions and Attitudes
Chaiwoo Lee(&), Carley Ward, Martina Raue, Lisa D’Ambrosio,

and Joseph F. Coughlin
Massachusetts Institute of Technology AgeLab, Cambridge, MA, USA

chaiwoo@mit.edu
Abstract. As self-driving cars begin to make their way on to the road, there is a
growing need for research to understand acceptance of the technology among
potential users. This study looked at responses from a national sample of 1,765
adults in the United States to uncover key determinants of the acceptance of
self-driving cars and to understand how age and other characteristics relate to
perceptions of and attitudes toward self-driving cars. Data from the online
survey showed that perceived usefulness, affordability, social support, lifestyle
fit and conceptual compatibility are key predictors of acceptance of self-driving
cars across ages. A comparison across generational cohorts (i.e., Millennials,
Generation X, Baby Boomers and the Silent Generation) found that age nega-
tively affects perceptions of a self-driving car, interest in using it, and behavioral
intentions to use one when it becomes available. Furthermore, experiential
characteristics associated with age, including experiences with, knowledge of
and trust toward technology in general, were found to have significant influence
on how people felt about self-driving cars.
Keywords: Technology adoption Automotive technology Automated

driving Traffic safety Technology experience
1 Introduction
A growing number of companies and organizations are working to bring self-driving

cars – vehicles that can sense the surrounding environment and operate in it without
requiring control, navigation or monitoring from a driver – to the road. Prototypes of
self-driving cars and related technologies are continuously being tested for their
functionality. Little is known, however, about how self-driving cars and their features
are perceived and accepted by potential consumers and users.
There is a significant body of research around technology acceptance across various
domains. Numerous studies have built on to earlier models such as the Technology
Acceptance Model (TAM) [1] and the Diffusion of Innovations Theory [2]. In TAM,
perceived usefulness and perceived ease-of-use are main factors that affect a user’s
attitudes toward using technology, which then influences the user’s behavioral inten-
tions and actual usage, as illustrated in Fig. 1. In the Diffusion of Innovations Theory,
five characteristics – relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and
observability – are the key factors that underlie adoption. Research stemming from
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

J. Zhou and G. Salvendy (Eds.): ITAP 2017, Part I, LNCS 10297, pp. 3–13, 2017.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_1
4 C. Lee et al.
Fig. 1. Technology acceptance model [1]
these early models has described how perceived usefulness, ease-of-use, social influ-
ence, personal characteristics, cost and other factors also affect the adoption and use of
technologies [3–8].
Recently, studies have begun to explore user perceptions and attitudes in relation to
the acceptance of automotive technologies. In a study on automotive telematics, vehicle
technologies that combine wireless communications technology and location-based
services, Chen and Chen [9] tested different technology acceptance frameworks to
understand the determinants of adoption and found perceived ease of use to be a key
factor. Effects of individual characteristics on adoption have gained interest as well. For
example, Son et al. [10] studied advanced driver assistance systems including forward
collision warning and lane departure warning, and found differences by gender and age,
with women and younger drivers showing lower acceptance. Efforts to understand user
acceptance of automotive technologies are also beginning to focus on automated
vehicles that do not require a human operator. For example, Madigan et al. [11] studied
user acceptance of an automated public transport service for short-haul travel and found
performance expectancy, effort expectancy and social influence to be key predictors.
Abraham et al. [12] conducted a large-scale survey to understand acceptance of varying
levels of automation in vehicles, and found that younger adults were more comfortable
with the fully autonomous, or self-driving, mode compared to older adults.
Self-driving cars promise benefits for a diversity of road users, including drivers of
various ages and abilities. With the aging of the population, the number of older drivers
is expected to increase rapidly. The number of licensed drivers 70 years of age and
older increased by 38% between 1997 and 2014 [13], and the trend is projected to
continue. Age-related changes in physical and cognitive capabilities, however, can lead
to declines in mobility and driving abilities [14, 15], leading many older adults to stop
driving altogether. For this reason, they may be the primary beneficiaries of self-driving
cars. Older adults, however, have knowledge of and experiences with technology that
may differ from younger generations, which may cause them to perceive and accept
self-driving cars differently [10, 12].
While research on technology adoption and transportation safety has begun to
explore determinants of acceptance and age effects with regards to new automotive
technologies, how different generations perceive and accept self-driving cars is not yet
fully understood. In this study, a large-scale survey was conducted to investigate older
adults’ perceptions of and attitudes toward self-driving cars, and how their perspectives
differ from other generations.
Age Differences in Acceptance of Self-driving Cars 5
2 Data Collection
2.1 Questionnaire Design
A questionnaire was designed to gather people’s attitudes toward and perceptions of
self-driving cars, as well as interest in use and adoption. Questions explored various
factors that contribute to technology acceptance and adoption identified in previous
research [1, 8], as described in Table 1. In order to learn about other characteristics that
may affect acceptance of a self-driving car, questions were also asked around experi-
ences with technology in general, driving behavior and history, and demographics.
The questionnaire also included the following short description of a self-driving
car: “For the purpose of this study, we define self-driving cars as those in which
operation of the vehicle occurs without the driver controlling the steering, acceleration,
and braking; the driver is not expected to constantly monitor the roadway.
A self-driving car uses advanced sensors and software to navigate itself to your des-
tination, understand the road environment, and react to various changes in the driving
situation from traffic congestion to a pedestrian crossing the street. Some of the
anticipated benefits from these vehicles include: more opportunity for people to use
their time productively, increased safety on the road, and greater efficiency.” Partici-
pants were shown the description before the questions displayed in Table 1 were asked,
in order to establish a basic baseline knowledge.
Table 1. Technology adoption factors asked in the survey (adapted from [1, 8])
Category Factor Question statement Response scale
Perceptions Usefulness How effective do you think that 1: Not effective
self-driving cars will be at at all–5: very
preventing accidents? effective
Ease of use Self-driving cars would be easy to 1: Strongly
use disagree–5:
Affordability Self-driving cars would be affordable strongly agree
for me
Accessibility I will know where to find
self-driving cars when they become
available
Technical I will know where to go for technical
support support if something went wrong
with a self-driving car
Emotional Self-driving cars would provide
benefits emotional benefits to users
Social support My family and friends will approve
of me using a self-driving car
Reliability Self-driving cars will work reliably
over time
(continued)
6 C. Lee et al.
Table 1. (continued)
Category Factor Question statement Response scale
Interoperability Self-driving cars will work well with
other smart technologies
Lifestyle fit Using a self-driving car will fit into
my lifestyle
Conceptual Self-driving cars will work in ways
compatibility/fit that make sense to me
Attitudes Overall interest How interested are you in using a 1: Not at all–5:
toward use self-driving car? very interested
Behavioral Likelihood of How likely would you be to 1: Not at all–5:
intention to adoption - purchase a self-driving car? very likely
use general
Likelihood of How likely would you be to use a
adoption - self-driving car if you were no
conditional longer capable of driving?
External Age (year of What is your year of birth? n/a
variables birth)
Technology How would you rate your level of 1: Not
experience experience with technology in experienced at
general? all–5: very
experienced
Technology How confident are you generally in 1: Not very
confidence your ability to learn and use new confident–5:
technologies? extremely
confident
Technology How would you rate your overall 1: No trust at all–
trust level of trust toward technology? 5: very high trust
Knowledge of Select the technologies that you 0 (none
new know about: smart glasses, smart checked)–13 (all
technologies watches, smart thermostats, smart checked)
TVs, drones, 3-D printers, tablets,
smartphones, GPS navigation
systems, fitness bands, cloud data
storage, ridesharing services and
mobile payment services.
Driving Do you have a current, valid driver’s Yes or no
experience license?
2.2 Sample Profile

The survey was conducted in the United States, and responses were collected from a
national sample of 1,765 adults. Data collection was completed online with a panel
service provided by Qualtrics (http://qualtrics.com). The sample represented a wide age
distribution and various demographic traits as summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Participant profile (n = 1,765)

Characteristics Descriptive statistics
Age (year of birth) Silent Generation (born on or before 1945): 241 (13.7%)
Older Baby Boomers (born 1946–1954): 303 (17.2%)
Younger Baby Boomers (born 1955–1964): 341 (19.3%)
Generation X (born 1965–1980): 332 (18.8%)
Older Millennials (born 1981–1989): 307 (17.4%)
Younger Millennials (born 1990–1998): 241 (13.7%)
Gender Male: 933 (52.9%)
Female: 815 (46.2%)
Other or no answer: 17 (1.0%)
Education Some high school or less: 36 (2.0%)
High school diploma: 354 (20.1%)
Some college: 442 (25.0%)
Trade/technical/vocational school or associate’s degree: 210
(11.9%)
College degree: 449 (25.4%)
Some post-graduate work: 75 (4.2%)
Post-graduate degree: 199 (11.3%)
Marital status Single, never married: 509 (28.8%)
Married or living with a partner: 926 (52.5%)
Divorced or separated: 230 (13.0%)
Widowed: 99 (5.6%)
Other: 1 (0.1%)
Ethnicity White: 1411 (79.9%)
Black or African-American: 147 (8.3%)
Hispanic or Latino: 56 (3.2%)
Asian or Asian-American: 77 (4.4%)
Other or multiracial: 74 (4.2%)
Employment Employed full-time: 526 (29.8%)
Employed part-time: 172 (9.7%)
Not employed: 197 (11.2%)
Self-employed: 123 (7.0%)
Retired: 501 (28.4%)
Student: 80 (4.5%)
Homemaker: 143 (8.1%)
Annual household Less than 25,000 USD: 451 (25.6%)
income 25,000 USD or more but less than 50,000 USD: 529 (30.0%)
50,000 USD or more but less than 75,000 USD: 365 (20.7%)
150,000 USD or more: 50 (2.8%)
8 C. Lee et al.
The majority of the participants had a valid driver’s license at the time of data
collection (89.2%). Most of them self-reported as frequent and safe drivers, with 57.2%
driving at least five days per week; 69.8% reported they had never been stopped by a
police officer for a moving violation, and 51.4% reported they had never been in a
traffic accident.
3 Results
Statistical analysis was done to describe how perceptions of self-driving cars influence
attitudes toward use and behavioral intentions to use them. Effects of age were analyzed
to understand how potential users of different generations feel about self-driving cars
and if they differ in terms of their willingness to use. Possible effects of past experiences
with technology and driving behavior were also analyzed. The overall research model,
which includes factors and measures described in Table 1, is illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Conceptual research model
3.1 Determinants of Self-driving Car Acceptance

The results of a regression analysis of acceptance measures on adoption factors are
summarized in Table 3. The following factors were significant predictors of
self-driving car acceptance: perceived usefulness, affordability, social support, lifestyle
fit and conceptual compatibility. Across ages, those who perceived self-driving cars to
be more practical, affordable, accepted by peers, and compatible with their lifestyles
and conceptual mental models were more interested in getting and using them. Fur-
thermore, attitudinal interest in self-driving cars strongly predicted behavioral inten-
tions to use them.
Table 3. Regression results: effects of adoption factors (standardized b coefficients)

Independent measures Dependent measures
Attitude Behavioral intentions
Overall General Conditional
interest
Perceptions Usefulness .294** .274** .219**
Ease of use .036 .101 .086**
Affordability .060** .209** –.053*
Accessibility –.017 .025 .004
Technical support .006 .024 –.050
Emotional benefits .028 .020 .090**
Social support .053* .058* .055*
Reliability .010 –.032 .046
Interoperability .001 –.032 .033
Lifestyle fit .389** .336** .265**
Conceptual fit .103** .052 .132**
R2 (perceptions ! attitude and .721 .648 .549
behavioral intentions)
Attitude Overall interest – .891** .775**
R2 (attitude ! behavioral – .794 .600
intentions)
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
3.2 Age Differences

Age was negatively associated with perceptions, attitudes and behavioral intentions
toward the acceptance and use of self-driving cars. As summarized in Table 4, a
comparison of average ratings across generations with analysis of variance (ANOVA)
showed that older participants perceived self-driving cars as significantly less useful
(F = 33.033, p = .000) and more difficult to use (F = 26.965, p = .000) compared to
younger participants. Older adults were also more likely to think that self-driving cars
would be more expensive (F = 45.233, p = .000) and more difficult to find where to
purchase or access (F = 8.025, p = .000). Older adults indicated that they believed
self-driving cars were less likely to be backed up with technical support (F = 21.406,
p = .000), less likely to provide emotional benefits (F = 20.853, p = .000), less likely
to be approved by their peers (F = 27.341, p = .000), less reliable (F = 14.530,
p = .000), less likely to work with other technologies they have (F = 21.637,
p = .000), and less likely to fit with their lifestyles (F = 44.268, p = .000) and mental
models (F = 21.483, p = .000), compared to younger participants.
Strong inverse relationships with age were also found for overall level of interest in
using a self-driving car (F = 90.529, p = .000) and likelihood of purchasing one in the
future (general: F = 82.792, p = .000, if no longer able to drive: F = 41.170,
p = .000), indicating that older adults are currently less interested in self-driving cars
and less likely to use one when it becomes available. Millennials, those born between
10 C. Lee et al.
Table 4. Age differences: mean comparisons (all measured on a 5-point scale, ANOVA results
significant at a = 0.01 for all factors)
Silent Baby Boomers Generation X Millennials
generation (1946–1964) (1965–1980) (1981–1998)
(*1945)
Perceptions Usefulness 2.93 3.01 3.30 3.58
Ease of use 3.15 3.28 3.58 3.78
Affordability 2.12 2.18 2.55 2.95
Accessibility 2.92 2.95 2.99 3.30
Technical 2.61 2.73 2.97 3.27
support
Emotional 2.89 2.99 3.19 3.50
benefits
Social support 2.71 2.92 3.18 3.45
Reliability 3.33 3.32 3.55 3.75
Interoperability 3.30 3.39 3.58 3.87
Lifestyle fit 2.47 2.77 3.17 3.49
Conceptual fit 3.05 3.16 3.39 3.67
Attitude Overall interest 2.15 2.48 3.10 3.57
Behavioral General 1.92 2.11 2.77 3.14
intention Conditional 2.85 2.97 3.48 3.77
1981 and 1998, were most favorable toward the use of self-driving cars. They indicated
interest in using a self-driving car (M = 3.57 out of 5), and said they would consider
getting one in the future generally (M = 3.14 out of 5) or if they were no longer able to
drive (M = 3.77 out of 5). On the opposite end, the Silent Generation, those born in or
before 1945, displayed low overall interest (M = 2.15 out of 5) and said that they are
not likely to consider using a self-driving car in any case (M = 1.92 out of 5). Across
ages, however, participants indicated that they would be more likely to use a
self-driving car if they were no longer able to drive and less likely to use one if they
were capable of driving.
3.3 Effects of Experience with Technology in General and Driving

In addition to age, experience with technology in general was strongly associated with
self-driving car acceptance. Regression analyses showed that, across ages, participants
who self-reported greater experience with technology in general and higher confidence
in use of new technologies were significantly more interested in self-driving cars and
more likely to purchase one in the future, as summarized in Table 5. Those who
self-reported being more knowledgeable of new technologies were significantly more
likely to purchase a self-driving car in the future if they were no longer able to drive.
Trust toward technology in general had the strongest effect on self-driving car
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who

notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of

any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project

Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend

considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -

Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If

you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set

forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the

Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of

Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500

West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to

the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws

regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states

where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot

make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current

donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Section 5. General Information About Project

Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several

printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,

including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.

Download textbook Human Aspects Of It For The Aged Population Aging Design And User Experience Third International Conference Itap 2017 Held As Part Of Hci International 2017 Vancouver Bc Canada July 9 14 2017 Proceedi ebook all chapter pdf

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Download textbook Human Aspects Of It For The Aged Population Aging Design And User Experience Third International Conference Itap 2017 Held As Part Of Hci International 2017 Vancouver Bc Canada July 9 14 2017 Proceedi ebook all chapter pdf

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Human Aspects of IT for the Aged

Population Aging Design and User

Design User Experience and Usability Theory Methodology

Distributed Ambient and Pervasive Interactions 5th

Human Computer Interaction User Interface Design

for the Aged Population

ISSN 0302-9743 ISSN 1611-3349 (electronic)

Library of Congress Control Number: 2017939345

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Printed on acid-free paper

This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature

The 19th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, HCI International

April 2017 Constantine Stephanidis

1. LNCS 10271, Human–Computer Interaction: User Interface Design, Development

Program Board Chair(s): Gavriel Salvendy, USA and P.R. China,

• Panagiotis Bamidis, Greece • Eugene Loos, The Netherlands

The 20th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, HCI International

Aging and Technology Acceptance

Age Differences in Acceptance of Self-driving Cars:

Mobile Technology Adoption Among Older People - An Exploratory Study

Everyday Life Interactions of Women 60+ with ICTs:

Privacy, Data Security, and the Acceptance of AAL-Systems –

Domestic Robots for Homecare: A Technology Acceptance Perspective. . . . . 57

User-Centred Design for the Elderly

Co-creation Methods: Informing Technology Solutions for Older Adults . . . . 77

Addressing Issues of Need, Adaptability, User Acceptability and Ethics

Towards Accessible Automatically Generated Interfaces Part 2:

Towards Accessible Automatically Generated Interfaces Part 1: An Input

Representing Meaning in User Experience by Visualizing Empirical Data . . . 147

A Study on Interactive Explanation Boards Design and Evaluation

A Pyramid Model of Inclusive Design to Get Outdoors for China’s

Using Care Professionals as Proxies in the Design Process of Welfare

Technology Experience Café—Enabling Technology–Driven Social

Research on Age-Adaptive Design of Information Interaction Based

Product Design for the Elderly

Study on PSD Model with FAHP Method in the Product Design

User Experience Design Research of New Types of Home Appliances

Analysis and Study on the Furniture Used by the Aging Population

A Sensory Emotion Data System for Designing Information Appliances . . . . 255

Users’ Affective Response to Furniture Design Based on Public Openness . . . 264

Emotions in Material Surfaces for Product Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275

Study on the Product Packaging Color Identification of Elder Men

Research on the Design of Smart Pension Product Modeling Based

Aging and User Experience

Acoustical Evaluation of Soundscape in Urban Spaces Along

Elderly Using Innovative Gesture Design of Satisfaction Performance . . . . . . 330

A Study of Usability on Internet Map Website . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339

How to Enhance Intergenerational Communication? The Influence

Factors in Fraudulent Emails that Deceive Elderly People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360

Silent Speech Interaction for Ambient Assisted Living Scenarios . . . . . . . . . 369

A Pilot Interface Evaluation Combined with Three-Dimensional

Personalized Computer Access for People with Severe Motor Disabilities:

Digital Literacy and Training

The Positive and Negative Impact of an Intergenerational Digital

Playful Method for Seniors to Embrace Information Technology. . . . . . . . . . 429

Eliciting Best Practices in Digital Literacy Tutoring: A Cognitive Task

Gamification on Senior Citizen’s Information Technology Learning:

The Study of Teaching the Smartphone Using in Taiwan’s Elderly

How to Guide the Use of Technology for Ageing-in-Place?

Exploring the Elders’ Information Needs on Home-Based Care:

Author Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511

Mobile and Wearable Interaction for the Elderly

How Do Users Interact with Mobile Devices? An Analysis of Handheld

Movement Analysis for Improving Older Adults’ Performances in HCI: