Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Mathematical Methods For Cancer Evolution Takashi Suzuki Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Mathematical Methods For Cancer Evolution Takashi Suzuki Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/dose-finding-designs-for-early-
phase-cancer-clinical-trials-a-brief-guidebook-to-theory-and-
practice-takashi-daimon/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematical-methods-for-
physics-and-engineering-1st-edition-mattias-blennow/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cancer-metabolism-methods-and-
protocols-majda-haznadar/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cancer-cytogenetics-methods-and-
protocols-methods-in-molecular-biology-1541-desconocido/
Methods for Human History: Studying Social, Cultural,
and Biological Evolution Patrick Manning
https://textbookfull.com/product/methods-for-human-history-
studying-social-cultural-and-biological-evolution-patrick-
manning/
https://textbookfull.com/product/computational-methods-in-
protein-evolution-tobias-sikosek/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cancer-stem-cells-methods-and-
protocols-methods-in-molecular-biology-2777-papaccio/
https://textbookfull.com/product/computational-aesthetics-
yasuhiro-suzuki/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematical-models-of-cancer-
and-different-therapies-unified-framework-regina-padmanabhan/
Lecture Notes on Mathematical Modelling
in the Life Sciences
Takashi Suzuki
Mathematical
Methods for Cancer
Evolution
Lecture Notes on Mathematical Modelling
in the Life Sciences
Editor-in-chief
Michael C. Mackey
Angela Stevens
Series editors
Martin Burger
Maurice Chacron
Odo Diekmann
Anita Layton
Jinzhi Lei
Mark Lewis
Lakshminarayanan Mahadevan
Philip Maini
Masayasu Mimura
Claudia Neuhauser
Hans G. Othmer
Mark Peletier
Alan S Perelson
Charles S. Peskin
Luigi Preziosi
Jonathan Rubin
Moisés Santillán
Christoph Schütte
James Sneyd
Peter Swain
Marta Tyran-Kamińska
Jianhong Wu
The rapid pace and development of the research inmathematics, biology and
medicine has opened a niche for a new type of publication - short, up-to-date,
readable lecture notes covering the breadth of mathematical modelling, analysis
and computation in the life-sciences, at a high level, in both printed and electronic
versions. The volumes in this series are written in a style accessible to researchers,
professionals and graduate students in the mathematical and biological sciences.
They can serve as an introduction to recent and emerging subject areas and/or as an
advanced teaching aid at colleges, institutes and universities. Besides monographs,
we envision that this series will also provide an outlet for material less formally
presented and more anticipatory of future needs, yet of immediate interest because
of the novelty of its treatment of an application, or of the mathematics being
developed in the context of exciting applications. It is important to note that
the LMML focuses on books by one or more authors, not on edited volumes. The
topics in LMML range from the molecular through the organismal to the
population level, e.g. genes and proteins, evolution, cell biology, developmental
biology, neuroscience, organ, tissue and whole body science, immunology and
disease, bioengineering and biofluids, population biology and systems biology.
Mathematical methods include dynamical systems, ergodic theory, partial differen-
tial equations, calculus of variations, numerical analysis and scientific computing,
differential geometry, topology, optimal control, probability, stochastics, statistical
mechanics, combinatorics, algebra, number theory, etc., which contribute to a
deeper understanding of biomedical problems.
Mathematical Methods
for Cancer Evolution
123
Takashi Suzuki
Center for Mathematical Modeling
and Data Science
Osaka University
Toyonaka, Osaka
Japan
Higher order living things consist of many key components such as the skeleton,
the locomotor apparatus, the respiratory apparatus, the cardiovascular system, the
digestive system, nerves, …, and then the central nervous system, which control
them all in unity. Organs, tissues, and cells form the organic hierarchy of an
individual, while each of them exhibits a certain individuality. Individualityis thus a
central factor of life.
Cells can be thought of the basic units of individuality. For example, cancer cells
invade normal tissues to destroy organs, viruses invade normal cells, and immune
cells attack viruses. Inside a cell are the nucleus, microsomes, Golgi apparatus,
lysosomes, mitochondria, … and various other organelles, through which proteins
transmit signals.
The purpose of the present monograph is to describe some recent developments in
mathematical modelling and mathematical analysis of certain problems arising from
cell biology. We are particularly interested in cancer cells and their growth via
several stages. To describe the event, multi-scale models are applied, involving
continuously distributed environment variables and several components related to
particles. Hybrid simulations are also carried out, using the discretization of envi-
ronment variables and the Monte Carlo method for the principal particle variables.
These modelling and simulation tools are put on rigorous mathematical foundations.
This monograph consists of four chapters. The first three chapters are concerned
with modelling, while the last one is devoted to mathematical analysis. In Chap.1, we
examine molecular dynamics at the early stage of cancer invasion. We construct a
pathway network model based on a biological scenario, and then determine its
mathematical structures. In Chap.2, we introduce the modelling over viewing several
biological insights, using partial differential equations. Transport mechanics and
movement via gradients are the main factors, and several models are introduced
including the Keller–Segel systems. In Chap.3, we turn to the method of averaging to
model the movement of particles. This is based on mean field theories, using
deterministic and stochastic approaches. Then, appropriate parameters for stochastic
simulations are examined. The segment model is finally proposed as an application.
In Chap.4, we examine thermodynamical features of these models and how these
v
vi Preface
1 Molecular Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Pathway Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Pathway Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2 Amounting the Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.1 Keller-Segel Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.2 Invasion Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.3 Smoluchowski-ODE Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.4 Smoluchowski-Poisson Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3 Averaging Particle Movements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.1 Deterministic Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.2 Random Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
3.3 Stochastic Simulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
3.4 Segment Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4 Mathematical Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
4.1 Negative Chemotaxis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
4.2 Parabolic Systems with Non-local Term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
4.3 Reaction-Diffusion Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
4.4 Competitive System of Chemotaxis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
4.5 Method of the Weak Scaling Limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
vii
Chapter 1
Molecular Dynamics
Tumors are formed by abnormal growth of tissue, and cancer is the term used for
malignant tumors. Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for 7.6
million deaths (around 13% of all deaths). Lung, stomach, liver, colon and breast
cancer cause the most cancer deaths each year, and about 13.1 million deaths in
2030 are predicted by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
Here we describe a mathematical modeling which arose from a biological scenario
for activation of basal membrane degradation at the early stage of cancer cell invasion.
b0 − abcc∞ curve will exhibit one peak, where b0 and abcc∞ denote the initial
and final concentrations of b and abcc, respectively (Fig. 1.2). Such a biological
observation was used in [59] for the construction of a mathematical model, but
below we shall adopt an axiomatic approach.
1.1 Pathway Modeling 3
The above biological model is concerned with the attachment and detachment of
three kinds of molecule, a, b, and c. Let us explain rule of their polymerization. First,
a has a hand which can attach b. Next, b has a hand that can attach a. This b has also
a hand that can attach c. Finally, c has a hand that can attach b and also has another
hand that can attach c. Excluding the other possibilities, we have 9 compounds made
by a, b, and c (Fig. 1.3). We assume that these chemical reactions are subject to the
law of mass action.
In this law, first, the reaction rate is defined as the production ratio due to chemical
reaction in iso-thermal liquid solution per unit time. By the definition, it is propor-
tional to the frequency of molecular collisions. From experimental data, next, this
frequency is proportional to the multiplication of the concentration of the reacting
chemical substances. The law of mass action arises under this agreement, and hence
the reaction rate is equal to a constant times the multiplication of concentrations of
reacting chemical substances.
In the fundamental attachment process
A + B → P (k), (1.1)
d[ A] d[B]
= −k[A][B], = −k[ A][B],
dt dt
where [ A], [B], and k denote the concentration of A, that of B, and the reaction rate,
respectively. It holds also that
4 1 Molecular Dynamics
d[P]
= k[ A][B],
dt
which implies the mass conservations of A and B particles,
d d
([ A] + [P]) = ([B] + [P]) = 0 (1.2)
dt dt
where [P] denotes the concentration of P. In the fundamental detachment process
P → A + B () (1.3)
we have
d[ A] d[B]
= [P], = [P],
dt dt
and hence
d[P]
= −[P],
dt
where denotes the reaction rate. Then (1.2) follows similarly. For the process
combined with (1.1) and (1.3),
A + B → AB (k), AB → A + B ()
so we obtain
d[A] d[B]
= −k[ A][B] + [AB], = −k[ A][B] + [ AB],
dt dt
d[AB]
= k[A][B] − [AB].
dt
The fundamental processes (1.1) and (1.3) may be applied to modified molecules,
for example,
Then we take
d[AB] d[B]
= −k[ AB][B] + [B AB], = −k[ AB][B] + [B AB],
dt dt
d[B AB]
= k[AB][B] − [B AB]
dt
which guarantees the total mass conservations for A and B, that is,
d d
([AB] + [B AB]) = 0, ([B] + [AB] + 2[B AB]) = 0. (1.5)
dt dt
1.1 Pathway Modeling 5
Since the collision of particles induces chemical reactions with a definite rate,
the mass action law is based on the assumption that the number of collisions of
particles in a vessel of unit volume and per unit time is proportional to the product
of the concentrations of these chemicals. Hence under (1.1) and (1.3) it is natural to
assume that
A + B B → AB B (2k), AB B → A + B B ()
and
A + AB → AB A (k), AB A → A + AB (2).
This implies
d[A] d[B B]
= −2k[A][B B] + [AB B], = −2k[ A][B B] + [ AB B],
dt dt
d[ AB B]
= 2k[A][B B] − [AB B]
dt
and
d[A] d[ AB]
= −k[ A][AB] + 2[AB A], = −k[ A][AB] + 2[ AB A],
dt dt
d[AB A]
= k[A][B B] − 2[AB A],
dt
respectively.
Considering
we have
d[A] d[ AB]
= −k[A][AB] + [A AB], = −k[ A][AB] + [A AB],
dt dt
d[ A AB]
= k[A][AB] − [A AB],
dt
which implies that
d d
([A] + [AB] + 2[A AB]) = 0, ([ AB] + [A AB]) = 0.
dt dt
If N A denotes the number of A molecules in a vessel of unit volume, the number of
A A collision there per unit time is N A (N A − 1)/2 ≈ N A2 /2. Hence (1.6) implies
A + A → A A (k/2), A A → A + A ().
6 1 Molecular Dynamics
Here we took the sum of two equations to derive the first equation of (1.7). Then it
the mass conservation of A particles holds:
d
([ A] + 2[A A]) = 0.
dt
Turning to the MT1-MMP model, we define the reaction rates k1 , k2 , k3 , 1 , 2 ,
and 3 by
a + b → ab (k1 ), ab → a + b (1 )
b + c → bc (k2 ), bc → b + c (2 )
c + c → cc (k3 /2), cc → c + c (3 ). (1.8)
We have experimental data of these values, but we do not have any experimental
data for the other reaction rates. Here we assume the rates in (1.8) for the reaction of
modificated molecules, for example,
Hence we take
d X3
= −k3 X 3 X 7 + 3 X 9 ,
dt
d X7
= −k3 X 3 X 7 + 3 X 9 ,
dt
d X9
= k3 X 3 X 7 − 3 X 9
dt
for abc + c → abcc (k3 ), abcc → abc + c (3 ), where X 3 = [c], X 7 = [abc], and
X 9 = [abcc]. Similarly, we use
d X3
= −k3 X 3 X 5 + 3 X 8 ,
dt
d X5
= −k3 X 3 X 5 + 3 X 8 ,
dt
d X8
= k3 X 3 X 5 − 3 X 8
dt
for bc + c → bcc (k3 ), bcc → bc + c (3 ), where X 5 = [bc], X 8 = [bcc], and also
1.1 Pathway Modeling 7
d X5
= −k3 X 5 X 7 + 3 X 11 ,
dt
d X7
= −k3 X 5 X 7 + 3 X 11 ,
dt
d X 11
= k3 X 5 X 7 − 3 X 11
dt
for abc + bc → abccb (k3 ), abccb → abc + bc (3 ), where X 11 = [abccb], and
so forth.
Based on the diagram described in Fig. 1.3, we end up with
d X1
= −k1 X 1 X 2 − k1 X 1 X 5 − k1 X 1 X 8 − 2k1 X 1 X 10 − k1 X 1 X 11 ,
dt
d X2
= −k1 X 1 X 2 − k2 X 2 X 3 − 2k2 X 2 X 6 − k2 X 2 X 8 − k2 X 2 X 9
dt
+2 X 5 + 2 X 8 + 22 X 10 + 2 X 11 ,
d X3
= −k2 X 2 X 3 − k3 X 3 X 3 − k2 X 3 X 4 − k3 X 3 X 5 − k3 X 3 X 7
dt
+2 X 5 + 23 X 6 + 2 X 7 + 3 X 8 + 3 X 9 ,
d X4
= k1 X 1 X 2 − k2 X 3 X 4 − 2k2 X 4 X 6 − k2 X 4 X 8 − k2 X 4 X 9
dt
+2 X 7 + 2 X 9 + 2 X 11 + 22 X 12 ,
d X5
= −k1 X 1 X 5 + k2 X 2 X 3 − k3 X 3 X 5 − k3 X 5 X 5 − k3 X 5 X 7
dt
−2 X 5 + 3 X 8 + 23 X 10 + 3 X 11 ,
d X6
= 2k3 X 3 X 3 − 2k2 X 2 X 6 − 2k2 X 4 X 6 − 3 X 6 + 2 X 8 + 2 X 9 ,
dt
d X7
= k1 X 1 X 5 + k2 X 3 X 4 − k3 X 3 X 7 − k3 X 5 X 7 − k3 X 7 X 7
dt
−2 X 7 + 3 X 9 + 3 X 11 + 23 X 12 ,
d X8
= −k1 X 1 X 8 + k2 X 2 X 6 − k2 X 2 X 8 + k3 X 3 X 5 − k2 X 4 X 8
dt
−2 X 8 + 22 X 10 + 2 X 11 − 3 X 8 ,
d X9
= k1 X 1 X 8 − k2 X 2 X 9 + k3 X 3 X 7 + 2k2 X 4 X 6 − k2 X 4 X 9
dt
−2 X 9 + 2 X 11 + 22 X 12 − 3 X 9 ,
d X 10
= −2k1 X 1 X 10 + k2 X 2 X 8 + 2k3 X 5 X 5 − 22 X 10 − 3 X 10 ,
dt
d X 11
= −k1 X 1 X 11 + 2k1 X 1 X 10 + k2 X 2 X 9 + k2 X 4 X 8 + k3 X 5 X 7
dt
−22 X 11 − 3 X 11 ,
d X 12
= k1 X 1 X 11 + k2 X 4 X 9 + 2k3 X 7 X 7 − 22 X 12 − 3 X 12 , (1.9)
dt
8 1 Molecular Dynamics
Mass action laws adapted above guarantee the total mass conservations of a, b, and
c, so that the quantities
X 1 + X 4 + X 7 + X 9 + X 11 + 2X 12 ,
X 2 + X 4 + X 5 + X 7 + X 8 + X 9 + 2X 10 + 2X 11 + 2X 12 ,
X 3 + X 5 + 2X 6 + X 7 + 2X 8 + 2X 9 + 2X 10 + 2X 11 + 2X 12
are invariant in time. This is actually confirmed by the model (1.9), since
d
(X 1 + X 4 + X 7 + X 9 + X 11 + 2X 12 ) = 0,
dt
d
(X 2 + X 4 + X 5 + X 7 + X 8 + X 9 + 2X 10 + 2X 11 + 2X 12 ) = 0,
dt
d
(X 3 + X 5 + 2X 6 + X 7 + 2X 8 + 2X 9 + 2X 10 + 2X 11 + 2X 12 ) = 0.
dt
The next observation is that the reaction rates (1.8) are used for all other processes.
According to this assumption, all the paths are classified in three categories: the
attachment and detachment of a-b, b-c, and c-c. Since 1 = 0, the first case is
reduced to
a + bB → abB (k1 ),
X 1 + X 2 → X 4, X 1 + X 5 → X 7, X 1 + X 8 → X 9,
X 1 + X 10 → X 11 , X 1 + X 11 → X 12 ,
or overall,
X 1 + (X 2 + X 5 + X 8 + X 10 + X 11 )
→ X 4 + X 7 + X 9 + X 11 + X 12 (k1 ). (1.10)
1.2 Pathway Analysis 9
It follows that
d
X 1 = −k1 X 1 (X 2 + X 5 + X 8 + X 10 + X 11 ),
dt
d
(X 2 + X 5 + X 8 + 2X 10 + X 11 ) = −k1 X 1 (X 2 + X 5 + X 8
dt
+X 10 + X 11 ). (1.11)
The first and the second equations of (1.11) govern the conservations of mass of a and
b, respectively, in this reaction. Since two b’s of X 10 are active in (1.10) we put X 10
twice on the left-hand side of the second equation of (1.11). In fact the conservation
of mass of b now reads
d X1 d
= (X 2 + X 5 + X 8 + 2X 10 + X 11 ).
dt dt
The reactions
bB + c C → BbcC (k2 ), BbcC → bB + c C (2 ),
and
X 4 + X 3 ↔ X 7, X 4 + X 6 ↔ X 9,
X 4 + X 8 ↔ X 11 , X 4 + X 9 ↔ X 12 , (1.13)
or
(X 2 + X 4 ) + (X 3 + X 6 + X 8 + X 9 )
→ X 5 + X 7 + X 8 + X 9 + X 10 + X 11 + X 12 (k2 ),
X 5 + X 7 + X 8 + X 9 + X 10 + X 11 + X 12
→ (X 2 + X 4 ) + (X 3 + X 6 + X 8 + X 9 ) (2 ). (1.14)
Then we obtain
d
(X 2 + X 4 ) = −k2 (X 2 + X 4 )(X 3 + X 6 + X 8 + X 9 )
dt
+2 (X 5 + X 7 + X 8 + X 9 + X 10 + 2X 11 + X 12 ),
d
(X 3 + 2X 6 + X 8 + X 9 ) = −k2 (X 2 + X 4 )(X 3 + X 6 + X 8 + X 9 )
dt
+2 (X 5 + X 7 + X 8 + X 9 + X 10 + 2X 11 + X 12 ). (1.15)
10 1 Molecular Dynamics
The first and the second equations of (1.15) govern the conservation of mass of b and
c, respectively, in this reaction. Here the term 2X 6 on the left-hand side of the second
equation indicates that two c’s of X 6 are active in the attachement of (1.14). The
presence of the term 2X 11 on the right-hand sides of both equations of (1.15) is due
to the fact that X 11 is involved by the reactions of both X 2 and X 4 in (1.12)–(1.13).
The reactions
X 3 + X 3 ↔ X 6, X 3 + X 5 ↔ X 8, X 3 + X 7 ↔ X 9, (1.16)
X 5 + X 3 ↔ X 8, X 5 + X 5 ↔ X 10 , X 5 + X 7 ↔ X 11 , (1.17)
and
X 7 + X 3 ↔ X 9, X 7 + X 5 ↔ X 11 , X 7 + X 7 ↔ X 12 . (1.18)
1.2 Pathway Analysis 11
d
(X 3 + X 5 + X 7 )
dt
= −k3 {(X 3 + X 5 + X 7 )2 + X 32 + X 52 + X 72 }
+23 (2X 6 + 2X 8 + 2X 9 + 2X 10 + 2X 11 + 2X 12 ). (1.19)
Using the above mentioned mass conservation and chemical reaction laws, we
can decompose the system into several modules, in which the solution is represented
explicitly [64] (Fig. 1.4).
Chapter 2
Amounting the Balance
Three factors: cell deformation, ECM degradation, and adhesion regulation arise at
sub-cell level in the early stage of invasion of cancer cells. To understand the relations
between them, the study of cell biology on proteins is integrated into mathematical
models. Here we focus on invadopodia, formed on the surface of malignant tumor
cells when they gain motility. Invadopodia are spiky, contain a lot of MT1-MMPs
inside, and act as drills toward ECM. Actin inside a cell, on the other hand, takes
two phases, F (solid) and G (liquid). The F-actin forms a network which casts a
skeleton of the cell. Finally, a positive feedback loop is observed concerning up-
regulation of MMPs. Our idea is to create in silico invadopodia using the above
feedback loop and the switching fluctuations. Here we present the most fundamental
tool of mathematical modeling, amounting the balance.
ut = α
means that it is produced at the amount of α per unit time. The formula
u t = ku,
is derived from α = ku which describes the case that this u produces itself with the
rate k per unit time (Fig. 2.1). The negative sign arises similarly, that is,
vt = −β
and
vt = −v.
u t = −∇ · j (2.1)
formalizes the law of mass conservation, where j stands for the flux of u and
⎛ ⎞
∂/∂x1
⎜ · ⎟
⎜ ⎟
∇=⎜
⎜ · ⎟
⎟
⎝ · ⎠
∂/∂xn
denotes the gradient operator (Fig. 2.2). Equation (2.1) arises together with the diver-
gence formula,
2.1 Keller-Segel Model 15
d
u dx = − ν · jd S, (2.2)
dt ω ∂ω
where ω is a domain with smooth boundary ∂ω, and ν and d S denote the outer unit
normal vector and surface element, respectively. The vector field ∇ϕ generated by
the scalar field ϕ = ϕ(x) points in direction where ϕ increases most and the length
equal to its inclination. Equality (2.2) indicates the mass inside ω is lost with the
amount of the outer normal component of j on ∂ω.
From a microscopic point of view, Newton’s equations of motion
dx dv
= v, m =F (2.3)
dt dt
represent the characteristic equations of the transport equation
∂ρ F
+ ∇x ρ · v + · ∇v ρ = 0. (2.4)
∂t m
If (x, v) = (x(t), v(t)) and ρ = ρ(x, v, t) are solutions to (2.3) and (2.4), respec-
tively, then it holds that
d
ρ(x(t), v(t), t) = 0
dt
16 2 Amounting the Balance
and hence ρ(x, v, t)d xdv is regarded as a particle density in the (x, v)-space. The
particle density and mean velocity are given by
u(x, t) = ρ(x, v, t)dv
and
1
V (x, t) = ρ(x, v, t)vdv,
u(x, t)
respectively.
The above j is sometimes associated with the gradient of a scalar field. If j =
−du ∇u, then u = u(x, t) is subject to diffusion and (2.1) reads
u t = ∇ · du ∇u,
with
∂u ∂v
d1 (u, v) − d2 (u, v) = 0,
∂ν ∂ν
∂v ∂w ∂p
= = =0 on ∂ × (0, T ) (2.6)
∂ν ∂ν ∂ν
where ⊂ R N is a bounded domain with smooth boundary ∂. Here, u = u(x, t),
v = v(x, t), w = w(x, t), and p = p(x, t) denote the density of the cellular
slime mold, concentration of the chemical material, that of enzyme, and that of the
complexes produced by v and w, respectively (Fig. 2.3). The nonlinearities d1 (u, v),
d2 (u, v), f (v), and g(v, w) are introduced on biological grounds; a more quantitive
based on biological experiments will be used if necessary.
Hence the first equation of (2.5) combined with the first boundary condition of
(2.6) governs the transport of u with the null-flux boundary condition,
u t = −∇ · j, ν · j|∂ = 0,
2.1 Keller-Segel Model 17
where j = −d1 (u, v)∇u + d2 (u, v)∇v stands for the flux of u = u(x, t), composed
of the diffusion and chemotaxis terms, −d1 (u, v)∇u and d2 (u, v)∇v, respectively:
(Fig. 2.2). The chemical materials v, w, and p are subject to the diffusion,
vt = −k1 vw + k−1 p,
wt = −k1 vw + (k−1 + k2 ) p,
pt = k1 vw − (k−1 + k2 ) p, (2.7)
(k1 ) → (k2 )
V +W P W + A. (2.8)
← (k−1 ) →
18 2 Amounting the Balance
with
∂p ∂w
D − pχ (w) =0 on ∂ × (0, T ) (2.10)
∂ν ∂ν
where p, w, D, χ , and g denote the existence probability, control species density, dif-
fusion coefficient, chemotactic sensitivity, and growth factor, respectively (Fig. 2.4).
The first equation of (2.9) is a generalization of the Smoluchowski equation and
(2.10) represents the null-flux condition. In the next chapter we shall see that it is
based on modeling the movement of many particles.
The second equation of (2.9) is an ordinary differential equation. It governs the
signaling process in accordance with the following functions:
1. (linear growth) g( p, w) = p − μw.
2. (exponential growth) g( p, w) = ( p − μ)w.
pw p
3. (saturated growth) g( p, w) = − μw + γ .
1 + νw 1+ p
It is assumed that the control species w is subject to the process of ligand-receptor
coupling
R + W → F (k1 ), F → R + W (k−1 ).
It follows that
dr
= −k1r w + k−1 f,
dt
dw
= −k1r w + k−1 f,
dt
df
= k1r w − k−1 f,
dt
where r = [R], w = [W ], and f = [F].
We have the total mass conservation r + f = c and also r w = γ f in the stationary
state, where γ = k−1 /k1 is the equilibrium constant. Putting c = 1, we obtain
w
f = .
γ+w
βw
χ(w) = ,
γ+w
The Chaplain-Anderson model [18] concerning the invasion of cancer cells at the
tissue level is formulated by
n t = dn n − γ∇ · (n∇c),
ct = −δ f c,
f t = d f f + αn − β f in × (0, T ), (2.11)
20 2 Amounting the Balance
with
∂n ∂c ∂f
dn − γn = =0 on ∂ × (0, T ). (2.12)
∂ν ∂ν ∂ν
Here, dn , γ, δ, d f , α, and β are positive constants, and n, c, and f denote the density
of cells, that of ECM, and the concentration of MMP, respectively. In accordance
with the Keller-Segel model (2.5), the chemical reaction is reduce to ODE. It is thus a
multi-scale model and (n, c) is subject to the Smoluchowski ODE system (2.9) with
(2.10). The unknown variable f stands for the concentration of enzyme, subject to
diffusion, production by n, and self-decay.
More precisely, in the first equation of (2.11), the first term on the right-hand side
describes the diffusive property of cancer cells at the tissue level. Then its second
term reflects a feature called haptotaxis, which means that the cancer cells invade
the ECM territory. Hence a linear haptotactic sensitivity is assumed. The second
equation of (2.11) models the mass action associated with the ECM degradation by
MMPs. The third equation of (2.11) describes the secretory and decay properties of
MMPs produced by cancer cells.
A cell level model is used in [109]. First, the chemical reaction between f and c
is considered. Using the density of ECM fragment, denoted by c∗ , we take
2.2 Invasion Model 21
ct = −κc c f,
c∗t = dc∗ c∗ + κc c f − λc∗ c∗ in × (0, T ) (2.13)
with
∂c∗
=0 on ∂ × (0, T ), (2.14)
∂ν
because c∗ is secretory. Here, κc , dc∗ , and λc∗ are the reaction rate of C + F → C∗ ,
diffusion coefficient, and decay rate of c∗ , respectively. Below we use similar nota-
tions. From the feedback loop, binding to the receptor of c∗ provides the production
of MMPs f and also the regulation of actin n inside the cell. These processes may
be described by
n t = dn n − γn ∇ · (n∇c∗ ),
f t = d f f + κ f c∗ − λ f f in × (0, T ), (2.15)
with
∂n ∂c∗ ∂f
dn − γn n = =0 on ∂ × (0, T ). (2.16)
∂ν ∂ν ∂ν
There is, however, transport of f via n, which can be modeled by modifying the
second equation of (2.15) and the corresponding boundary condition of (2.16) to
f t = d f f + κ f c∗ − λ f f + γ f ∇ · ( f ∇n) in × (0, T )
and
∂f ∂n
df + γf f =0 on ∂ × (0, T ),
∂ν ∂ν
respectively. Thus n pushes f to the plasma membrane (see Fig. 2.5). Finally, since
the events inside and outside the cell must be distinguished, we add the factor that
ECM is repulsive to actin. This factor is treated by replacing the first equation of
(2.15) by
n t = dn n + ∇ · (n∇χ(c)) − γn ∇ · (n∇c∗ ).
n t = dn n + ∇ · (n∇χ(c)) − γn ∇ · (n∇c∗ ),
ct = −κc c f,
c∗t = dc∗ c∗ + κc c f − λc∗ c∗ ,
f t = d f f + κ f c∗ − β f + γ f ∇ · ( f ∇n), (2.17)
22 2 Amounting the Balance
where dn , dc∗ , d f , γn , γ f , κc , κ f , and λc∗ are constants (Fig. 2.5). The flux of n is
now given by
j = −dn ∇n − n∇χ(c) + γn n∇c∗ ,
∂c∗ ∂f
j ·ν = = = 0.
∂ν ∂ν
The positive feedback loop model (2.17), however, does not cause the localization
in space-time of the variables, n, f , and c. Since our motivation is to produce in silico
invadopodia, here we assume that the fluctuation of the ECM degradation rate κc
exhibits several peaks on the plasma membrane. In Fig. 2.5, the Allen-Cahn dynamics
is used to describe such fluctuation, which, however, is not essential (see [109]).
In any case we obtain in silico invadopodia. Then the simulations of modified
models, made by cutting some pathways, clarify the role of two feedback loops
(Fig. 2.6), that is, ECM fragments to MMPs directly, and ECM fragments to MMP’s
indirectly via actin. Thus there are direct upregulation of f by c∗ and also regulation
of n by c∗ inducing the transport of f . Numerical simulations then suggest that these
feeback loops act as peaking and expansion of the plasma membrane, respectively.
* * * * *
Captain Ross was in the Antarctic, coasting the great ice barrier.
Last year he had given to two tall volcanoes the names of his ships,
the Erebus and Terror. This year on March twelfth in a terrific gale with
blinding snow at midnight the two ships tried to get shelter under the
lee of an iceberg, but the Terror rammed the Erebus so that her bow-
sprit, fore topmast and a lot of smaller spars were carried away, and
she was jammed against the wall of the berg totally disabled. She
could not make sail and had no room to wear round, so she sailed out
backward, one of the grandest feats of seamanship on record; then,
clear of the danger, steered between two bergs, her yard-arms almost
scraping both of them, until she gained the smoother water to leeward,
where she found her consort.
* * * * *
In Canada the British governor set up a friendship between the
French Canadians and our government which has lasted ever since.
That was on the eighth of September, but on the fifth another British
dignitary sailed for home, having generously given a large slice of
Canada to the United States.
* * * * *
In Hayti there was an earthquake, in Brazil a revolution; in Jamaica
a storm on the tenth which wrecked H. M. S. Spitfire, and in the
western states Mount Saint Helen’s gave a fine volcanic eruption.
Northern Mexico was invaded by two filibustering expeditions from
the republic of Texas, and both were captured by the Mexicans. There
were eight hundred fifty prisoners, some murdered for fun, the rest
marched through Mexico exposed to all sorts of cruelty and insult
before they were lodged in pestilence-ridden jails. Captain Edwin
Cameron and his people on the way to prison overpowered the escort
and fled to the mountains, whence some of them escaped to Texas.
But the leader and most of his men being captured, President Santa
Ana arranged that they should draw from a bag of beans, those who
got black beans to be shot. Cameron drew a white bean, but was shot
all the same. One youth, G. B. Crittenden, drew a white bean, but gave
it to a comrade saying, “You have a wife and children; I haven’t, and I
can afford to risk another chance.” Again he drew white and lived to be
a general in the great Civil War.
General Green’s party escaped by tunneling their way out of the
castle of Perot, but most of the prisoners perished in prison of hunger
and disease. The British and American ministers at the City of Mexico
won the release of the few who were left alive.
* * * * *
In 1842 Sir James Simpson, Governor of the Hudson’s Bay
Company, with his bell-topper hat and his band, came by canoe across
the northern wilds to the Pacific Coast. From San Francisco he sailed
for Honolulu in the Sandwich Islands, where the company had a large
establishment under Sir John Petty. On April sixteenth he arrived in the
H. B. ship Cowlitz at the capital of Russian America. “Of all the
drunken as well as the dirty places,” says he, “that I had ever visited,
New Archangel was the worst. On the holidays in particular, of which,
Sundays included, there are one hundred sixty-five in the year, men,
women and even children were to be seen staggering about in all
directions drunk.” Simpson thought all the world, though, of the
Russian bishop.
The Hudson’s Bay Company had a lease from the Russians of all
the fur-trading forts of Southeastern Alaska, and one of these was the
Redoubt Saint Diogenes. There Simpson found a flag of distress,
gates barred, sentries on the bastions and two thousand Indians
besieging the fort. Five days ago the officer commanding, Mr.
McLoughlin, had made all hands drunk and ran about saying he was
going to be killed. So one of the voyagers leveled a rifle and shot him
dead. On the whole the place was not well managed.
From New Archangel (Sitka) the Russian Lieutenant Zagoskin
sailed in June for the Redoubt Saint Michael on the coast of Behring
Sea. Smallpox had wiped out all the local Eskimos, so the Russian
could get no guide for the first attempt to explore the river Yukon. A
day’s march south he was entertained at an Eskimo camp where there
was a feast, and the throwing of little bladders into the bay in honor of
Ug-iak, spirit of the sea. On December ninth Zagoskin started inland
—“A driving snow-storm set in blinding my eyes ... a blade of grass
seventy feet distant had the appearance of a shrub, and sloping
valleys looked like lakes with high banks, the illusion vanishing upon
nearer approach. At midnight a terrible snow-storm began, and in the
short space of ten minutes covered men, dogs and sledges, making a
perfect hill above them. We sat at the foot of a hill with the wind from
the opposite side and our feet drawn under us to prevent them from
freezing, and covered with our parkas. When we were covered up by
the snow we made holes with sticks through to the open air. In a short
time the warmth of the breath and perspiration melted the snow, so
that a man-like cave was formed about each individual.” So they
continued for five hours, calling to one another to keep awake, for in
that intense cold to sleep was death. There we may as well leave
them, before we catch cold from the draft.
* * * * *
Fremont was exploring from the Mississippi Valley a route for
emigrants to Oregon, and in that journey climbed the Rocky Mountains
to plant Old Glory on one of the highest peaks. He was a very fine
explorer, and not long afterward conquered the Mexican state of
California, completing the outline of the modern United States. But
Fremont’s guide will be remembered long after Fremont is forgotten,
for he was the greatest of American frontiersmen, the ideal of modern
chivalry, Kit Carson. Of course he must have a chapter to himself.
XIII
A.D. 1843
KIT CARSON
General Nicholson
Nicholson’s column on the march was surrounded by his own
wild guards riding in couples, so that he, their god, searched the
whole country with five hundred eyes. After one heart-breaking night
march he drew up his infantry and guns, then rode along the line
giving his orders: “In a few minutes you will see two native regiments
come round that little temple. If they bring their muskets to the
‘ready,’ fire a volley into them without further orders.”
As the native regiments appeared from behind the little temple,
Nicholson rode to meet them. He was seen to speak to them and
then they grounded their arms. Two thousand men had surrendered
to seven hundred, but had the mutineers resisted Nicholson himself
must have perished between two fires. He cared nothing for his life.
Only once did this leader blow mutineers from the guns, and
then it was to fire the flesh and blood of nine conspirators into the
faces of a doubtful regiment. For the rest he had no powder to
waste, but no mercy, and from his awful executions of rebels he
would go away to hide in his tent and weep.
He had given orders that no native should be allowed to ride
past a white man. One morning before dawn the orderly officer, a lad
of nineteen, seeing natives passing him on an elephant, ordered
them sharply to dismount and make their salaam. They obeyed—an
Afghan prince and his servant, sent by the king of Cabul as an
embassy to Captain Nicholson. Next day the ambassador spoke of
this humiliation. “No wonder,” he said, “you English conquer India
when mere boys obey orders as this one did.”
Nicholson once fought a Bengal tiger, and slew it with one stroke
of his sword; but could the English subdue this India in revolt? The
mutineers held the impregnable capital old Delhi—and under the red
walls lay four thousand men—England’s forlorn hope—which must
storm that giant fortress. If they failed the whole population would
rise. “If ordained to fail,” said Nicholson, “I hope the British will drag
down with them in flames and blood as many of the queen’s
enemies as possible.” If they had failed not one man of our race
would have escaped to the sea.
Nicholson brought his force to aid in the siege of Delhi, and now
he was only a captain under the impotent and hopeless General
Wilson. “I have strength yet,” said Nicholson when he was dying, “to
shoot him if necessary.”
The batteries of the city walls from the Lahore Gate to the
Cashmere Gate were manned by Sikh gunners, loyal to the English,
but detained against their will by the mutineers. One night they saw
Nicholson without any disguise walk in at the Lahore Gate, and
through battery after battery along the walls he went in silence to the
Cashmere Gate, by which he left the city. At the sight of that gaunt
giant, the man they believed to be an incarnate god, they fell upon
their faces. So Captain Nicholson studied the defenses of a
besieged stronghold as no man on earth had ever dared before. To
him was given command of the assault which blew up the Cashmere
Gate, and stormed the Cashmere breach. More than half his men
perished, but an entry was made, and in six days the British fought
their way through the houses, breaching walls as they went until they
stormed the palace, hoisted the flag above the citadel, and proved
with the sword who shall be masters of India.
But Nicholson had fallen. Mortally wounded he was carried to his
tent, and there lay through the hot days watching the blood-red
towers and walls of Delhi, listening to the sounds of the long fight,
praying that he might see the end before his passing.
Outside the tent waited his worshipers, clutching at the doctors
as they passed to beg for news of him. Once when they were noisy
he clutched a pistol from the bedside table, and fired a shot through
the canvas. “Oh! Oh!” cried the Pathans, “there is the general’s
order.” Then they kept quiet. Only at the end, when his coffin was
lowered into the earth, these men who had forsaken their hills to
guard him, broke down and flung themselves upon the ground,
sobbing like children.
Far off in the hills the Nicholson fakirs—a tribe who had made
him their only god—heard of his passing. Two chiefs killed
themselves that they might serve him in another world; but the third
chief spoke to the people: “Nickelseyn always said that he was a