20240516-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To IBAC Re Enquiry Case - 20242400 - The Royal Melbourne Hospital (Re Mark Schorel MRN 1107850

Page 1
1
2
3 Independent Broad-based Anti-Corruption Commission (IBAC) Victoria 16-5-2024
4 https://www.ibac.vic.gov.au/ info@ibac.vic.gov.au
5
6 COMPLAINT-Supplemenent 1
7 Re: Enquiry Case -20242400 The Royal Melbourne Hospital (Re Mark Schorel MRN 1107850)
8
9 Sir/Madam,
10 Further to your email Wednesday, 15 May 2024 at 11:17:27 am AEST, IBAC Enquiry Email
11 info@ibac.vic.gov.au:
12
13 It appears to me that my son Mark health issues resulted after having been jabbed twice with the
14 FAKE covid-19 jab. It is therefore appropriate I include in this writing some of my past writings
15 including complaints and the gross failure of appropriate action by relevant entities that could in
16 my view not only have prevented Mark to suffer but also thousands of others and indeed may
17 have avoided many needless deaths.
18
19 The Royal Melbourne Hospital on its website provides information that any matters such
20 as theft are to be reported to IBAC. Hence, I did so, and provided a copy to The Royal
21 Melbourne Hospital also. My son Mark is fully aware of the complaint lodged.
22
23 I understand that after mark was first placed in SO2 he later as I understand it was placed
24 in SO4 and when then he was transferred to 14 his property was left behind. Mark after
25 some time discovering his property was missing staff relocated some and then
26 commenced to mark all his belongings with a sticker, but obviously his mobile, etc, were
27 missing. The Mobile was then used for fraudulent withdrawals, etc.
28
29 It might be a person who was visiting a patient nearby SO4 if not a patient, also in the
30 area and/or some other person having access to the area of SO4.
31
32
33
16-5-2024 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
Page 3
1
2
3 I could not locate any report regarding FH3221 this even so Mark clearly has numerous health
4 issues, and this seems to indicate that the medical profession failed to report his health issues
5 after the jabs.
6
7 Much of my own research published at my blog https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
8 underlines that even the TGA seemed to have failed to do a proper testing as to relevant issues.
9 Items were as contamination in the vials, preventing anyone to make an “informed decision” and
10 hence no person could have given informed consent”
11
12 I understand that 3 of my grandchildren ended up with AUTISM, and even so I in the past have
13 written extensively that all purported vaccinations should be stopped and not recommence unless
14 there is actually proper scientific information available to ascertain the validity of the claims
15 “safe and effective” and appropriate blood test and other medical test are performed to ensure
16 that any injection is medically justified and not merely so the medical profession can earn
17 monies and do not care about the rights of their victims.
18
19 I understand that the Commonwealth appears to have legislated for external forces to be
20 permitted to enter the Commonwealth of Australia and can forcefully inject any person and those
21 doing so cannot be held legally accountable, however constitutionally this is not permissible.
22 WA appears to already, albeit unconstitutionally, legislated for this to inject citizens with poison.
23 Likewise, the WHO (World Health Organisation) scheme that somehow the Commonwealth can
24 authorise a veterinarian head of WHO to determine what, if any, medical treatment and
25 medication a person can have violated so a large extend the State of Victoria constitutional
26 legislative powers.
27
28 Getting back to Mark:
29
30 I understand that medical advice was given to Mark that he has likely 2 months to 2 years to
31 live.
32
33 I may add that IBAC on 19 April 2020 responded to me that it held that my complaint
34 regarding the UNCONSTITUTIONAL purported mandates/covid-19 jabs was not of "public
35 interest". Well, it now appears that Mark for forced to be jabbed when employed by Holden,
36 see above images Mark Schorel MRN 1107850 -Pfizer.
Page 4
1
2 I wrote extensively to then Premier Daniel Andrews
3
4
5 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/dan-andrews-unreasonable-iron-hand-responsible-for-violent-
6 response-to-covid-protests/ar-
7 BB1mllf0?ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=881ec47615724c6a9a2b7bee641550c8&ei=71
8 Dan Andrews' 'unreasonable iron hand' responsible for 'violent' response to COVID
9 protests
10 Story by Sky News Australia
11
12 While the Victorian Ombudsman in response to my 8 April 2020 held that this was a matter for
13 IBAC it is clear IBAC declined to investigate. My 13 April 2020 complaint regarding the same
14 to the Victorian Human Rights Commissioner never had any response.
15
16 Obviously at that time I never expected my son to fall ill as he now has.
17
18 However, considering the many published reports as to what went wrong about this "covid
19 scam", etc, and that it was a "gene therapy" DEPOPULATION "bioweapon" designed to
20 exterminate most of the world population as I extensively exposed also, then to me it underlines
21 the lack of proper consideration by IBAC at the time.
22
23 QUOTE 20210220-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Senior Sergeant Kim French & Ors-COMPLAINT-
24 URGENT
25 Senior Sergeant Kim French & Ors 20-2-2021
26 Senior Sergeant 25942 I Greensborough Police Station
27 email: kim.french@police.vic.gov.au |
28 phone: 8432 0200 l fax: 8432 0232
29 address: 167-171 Grimshaw Street Greensborough 3088 | DX 211842
30
31 COMPLAINT - URGENT
32
33
34 20210220-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Senior Sergeant Kim French & Ors
35 Kim,
36 I became aware that apparently a crime in progress is already operating by that the
37 Commonwealth with assistance of Premier Daniel Andrews of the State of Victoria and others
38 are contemplating to misuse and abuse the TGA “clinical trials” approval for certain so called
39 “vaccination”.
40 As I understand it, “clinical trials” are ordinary conducted in stages. The First stage may involve
41 approximate 20-80 “informed” participants, which then are split in 2 groups where one is
42 provided with the “vaccine” while the other is provided with a “placebo” as to ascertain for so
43 far this is reasonably possible as to the effect, if any, of the “vaccine”.
44 One of the pharmaceutical product at the very least contain what is referred to as a “mRNA”
45 item which would constitute at least in my view that this is a “medical treatment” of any
46 participant participating and as such being a “medical treatment” requires strict supervision and
47 control by a medical specialist in “mRNA” matters. Dr Lee Merit in her video described the
48 vaccination using “mRNA” as using a “biological weapon” of which the medical conseuences
49 are still unknown for such kind of “vaccine”.
50
51 https://www.tga.gov.au/vaccines-overview
52 QUOTE
Page 5
1 We carefully assess the results of clinical trials and the way in which the trials
2 were conducted. We require well-designed trials of a sufficient length with a
3 sufficient number of people who represent the people for whom the vaccine is
4 intended. The results must demonstrate that the benefits of the vaccine greatly
5 outweigh the risks.
6 We also require vaccine manufacturers to meet manufacturing quality standards. As
7 a further check, our laboratories assess the quality of every batch of a vaccine
8 before it can be supplied in Australia.
9 END QUOTE
10
11 As such, any “clinical trials” about 20 to 80 participants includes those with “placebo” and
12 obviously not 12,000 in Victoria alone.
13
14 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/victoria-coronavirus-vaccine-rollout-who-is-getting-it-first-and-where-
15 will-it-be-delivered/ar-BB1dOmO5?ocid=spartan-dhp-feeds
16 Victoria coronavirus vaccine rollout: Who is getting it first, and where will it be delivered?
17 QUOTE
18 While authorities have for weeks flagged at-risk workers will be the first to get vaccinated
19 in the 1a phase of the rollout, today the Victorian government confirmed more details
20 about how the first stage will work.
21 Here's what we know.
22 Who will get the vaccine first in Victoria?
23 Workers who are most likely to come into direct contact with people who could have
24 coronavirus will be vaccinated first.
25 The 1a phase will cover hotel quarantine workers, airport and port workers, high-
26 risk frontline health staff, and public sector residential aged care staff and residents,
27 the state government said in a statement today.
28 Health professionals will start delivering doses of the Pfizer vaccine to those groups from
29 Monday.
30 "Our priority is to support the Commonwealth to make sure that the vaccine is
31 administered to workers at the highest risk of contracting COVID-19 as quickly and safely
32 possible," Health Minister Martin Foley said in a statement.
33 "Whether they work in hotel quarantine, at the airport, or a specialist COVID ward — we
34 need to keep Victorians most at risk of infection safe, while they continue to keep
35 Victorians safe."
36 How many vaccines will Victoria get?
37 The Commonwealth government has allocated 12,000 vaccines to Victoria for week
38 one of the 1a phase of the rollout.
39 Victoria will get a total of 59,000 doses of the Pfizer vaccine over the first four weeks, the
40 state government said.
41 Who will be rolling out the vaccines?
42 Vaccination "hubs" operated by three public health services in Melbourne — Austin
43 Health, Monash Health and Western Health — will deliver the first vaccines next week.
44 END QUOTE
45
46 As you likely are aware if the Victoria Police notice a person to be in posesseing of tools which
47 may indicate the person is in the progress or likely to commit a crime then the Victoria Police
48 can take appropriate action.
49 .

Page 6
1 Likewise, I view that the Victoria Police being made aware that the Commonwealth with the
2 State of Victoria intents to commit a crime or already are in progress of setting up such a crime
3 then the Victoria Police can act immediately.
4 .
5 As the members of the Victoria Police are part of first responders then if they also are subjected
6 to the vaccinations outside the limited control permitted by the TGA for “CLINICAL TRIALS”
7 then the safety, wellbeing and even the lives of your colleagues may be in jeopardy.
8 .
9 The very purpose of “CLINICAL TRIALS” stages is that in the event of serious adverse
10 reactions and even death then it is within a control groups closely monitored and so medical
11 specialist must supervise any “medical treatment” issue. In this case however, it appears to me
12 that to set up some system at an airport unlikely will be supervised by a qualified “medical
13 specialist” in the field of “mRNA” and neither be under the management of the relevant
14 pharmaceutical company. It in my view is not for any Government to take over the legal
15 responsibilities of a pharmaceutical company to prove to the TGA that its product involving a
16 “medical treatment” is within acceptable standards.
17
18 While ordinary vaccinations are often performed by nurses in health centres, however those kind
19 of vaccinations never to my understanding involved ‘”mRNA” and as such it must not be
20 misunderstood/misconceived that the “vaccination” such as Pfizer is an ordinary kind of
21 “vaccination”.
22
23 It also ought to be understood that regardless of the hype by the various governments about the
24 doomsday COVID-19 end of the world mantra, reality is that it has been grossly misused for
25 political motivations as the yearly deaths in various countries in 2020 versus 2019 indicates little
26 or no difference to when the ordinary influenza (flu) / “common cold” is part of why people have
27 died.
28
29 The Nuremberg Code-Hippocratic Oath must be enforced and in the process protect individuals from
30 uncalled harm, as I have set out in this document. See page 22 for Darren’s petition.
31
32 This document can be downloaded from:
33 https://www.scribd.com/document/493790847/20210209-PRESS-RELEASE-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
34 B-ISSUE-The-Nuremberg-Code-Hippocratic-Oath
35
36 As I explained in my document “20210209-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka
37 O.W.B. ISSUE -The Nuremberg Code-Hippocratic Oath” any participant must do so
38 “voluntarily” and as such no government can pursue that any person can be compelled to
39 participate in some “clinical trial” by for example to deny a person the right of freedom of
40 movement, etc, unless the person subject himself/herself to be “vaccinated”.
41 Neither in my view can Qantas legally require any person to be vaccinated as a condition to be
42 able to travel on any airliner. Neither to enforce any passenger to have some kind of “vaccination
43 passport”. I have set out in considerable details these issues and refer to my blog
44 at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati for the articles published.
45
46 My most recent publications are:
47
48 In my view the TGA should withdraw/stay its approval until a proper re-assessment
49 has been done at it appears to me it merely so to say rubberstamped the approval
50 without any proper trials to ensure Australians are not place at peril of inappropriate
51 vaccinations.

Page 7
1
3 https://www.scribd.com/document/494787830/20210217-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-PM-Mr-
4 SCOTT-MORRISON-Ors-Re-Vaccination-Issues
5
6
7 How can anyone trust scientist and those in the medical profession, even so there are many
8 good ones, when they so to say seem to be selling their soul to the devil. In this case power
9 hungry politicians at the cost of the lives of innocent Australians?
10
12 https://www.scribd.com/document/495046125/20210219-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-PM-Mr-SCOTT-
13 MORRISON-Ors-Re-Vaccination-Issues-Suppl-1
14
15
16 In my view you as Prime Minister Scott Morrison, every Premier, any Minister, each and
17 every public servant, medical care official, medical and scientific advisor who
18 assist/cooperate or otherwise provide support of unlawful conduct that may result in crimes
19 against humanity, manslaughter, murder, mass murder or any other harm to any person in
20 regard of the COVID-19 vaccine roll out in violation of a “LIMITED” “clinical trials”
21 should be charged and where convicted be ordered for life imprisonment without Parole
22 and any estate be sold off to compensate any victim or its family.
23
25 https://www.scribd.com/document/495204057/20210220-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-PM-Mr-
26 SCOTT-MORRISON-Ors-Re-Vaccination-Issues-Suppl-2
27
28 As I understand it the bogus “clinical trials are to commence on Monday 22 February 2021 then
29 it is essential that you inform police command also as to the apparently unlawful usage of any
30 “vaccine” outside the strictly limited “clinical trial” conditions.
31
32 Young nurse suffers from hemorrhage and brain swelling after second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-
33 19 vaccine – NaturalNews.com
34 Young nurse suffers from hemorrhage and brain swelling after second dose of Pfizer’s
35 COVID-19 vaccine
36 END QUOTE 20210220-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Senior Sergeant Kim French & Ors-
37 COMPLAINT- URGENT
38
39 My wife was an outpatient of Austin Hospital (her heart pumps only at 30% and her valves are
40 leaking, and subjected to the tyranny of mask and jabs which we both rejected. Public hospitals
41 cannot exercise any powers the state itself lack to have in legislative powers, and therefore only
42 the Commonwealth could have legislated for any QUARANTINE mandates to prevent any
43 man-kind infectious disease from spreading, that is there actually existed one, and not like covid-
44 19 was no more but the renaming of the flu, etc. However, the Commonwealth did not legislate
45 as such and could not delegate this power to the States/Territories! As such, not only public
46 hospitals but any business that pursued to enforce the UNCONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE
47 conditions should be held legally accountable!
48 As result basically my wife was denied ongoing “in-person” medical care and we had to engage
49 privately medical care for her. How on earth hospitals and even private businesses possibly can
50 enforce self/harm upon people is beyond me. Yet IBAC seems to be incompetent to deal with
51 this appropriately. The same with the Digital ID that the Commonwealth now pushes.
52

Page 8
1 Holden in my view had no legal powers to force my son Mark to be subjected to the fake covid-
2 19 jabs and hence there has to be a proper investigation into this and Holden being legally held
3 accountable for this and the harm, etc, resulting from this.
4
5 What we have is that various governments are legislating in areas outside their constitutional
6 powers and somehow no one that is most politicians, judges, law enforcement agencies, etc,
7 bother to deal with this.
8
9 Remember the Supreme Court of Victoria throwing out all charges against the Albert Park
10 protesters because the purported legislation had not been published in the Gazette?
11
12 When the British Parliament through the Monarch were able to enact the Commonwealth of
13 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) this had a profound implication upon the newly created
14 States (Section 106 “subject to this constitution”)
15
16 HANSARD 10-03-1891 Constitution Convention Debates
17 QUOTE
18 Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of
19 parliamentary sovereignty. Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark
20 on federation we throw parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer
21 supreme. Our parliaments at present are not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They
22 have not only the power of legislation, but the power of amending their constitutions. That
23 must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary sovereignty. No parliament
24 under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of
25 changing its constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the
26 parliaments of a federation are coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of
27 being vested in one body. More than all that, there is this difference: When parliamentary
28 sovereignty is dispensed with, instead of there being a high court of parliament, you bring
29 into existence a powerful judiciary which towers above all powers, legislative and
30 executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter of the constitution.
31 END QUOTE
32
33 What eventuated was that the Colony of Victoria Constitution Act 1855 on 1 January 1901
34 because of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) became the State of
35 Victoria Constitution Act 1855 on 1 January 1901. Likewise, so with other colonial
36 constitutions.
37
38 WATSON v_ LEE (1979) 144 CLR 374;( JUDGE3 STEPHEN J.)
39 QUOTE
40 As Scott L.J. said in Blackpool Corporation v. Locker (1948) 1 KB 349, at p
41 361 , speaking there of sub-delegated legislation, "there is one quite general
42 question . . . of supreme importance to the continuance of the rule of law
43 under the British constitution, namely, the right of the public affected to
44 know what that law is". The maxim that ignorance of the law is no excuse forms the
45 "working hypothesis on which the rule of law rests in British democracy" but to
46 operate it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is accessible to
47 the public - in the sense, of course, that at any rate its legal advisers have access to it at
48 any moment, as of right".
49 END QUOTE
50 Again;
51 QUOTE

Page 9
1 it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is

2 accessible to the public - in the sense, of course,
3 END QUOTE
4
5 This then places the question when was the State of Victoria Constitution Act 1855 (UK) as
6 amended by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) gazetted to become
7 law in the State of Victoria?
8
9 While any Colonial law that was gazetted prior to federation and not violating the provisions of
10 the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) continued to be valid in law,
11 however, any new legislation including the amended State of Victoria Constitution Act 1855
12 (UK) needed to be gazetted to be legally enforceable. Because as I understand it there was no
13 amended version gazetted politicians, lawyers, judges, etc, all seemed to go on as if the Colonial
14 State of Victoria Constitution Act 1855 (UK) was still applicable as such.
15 The fact that subjects such as QUARANTINE for “man-kind” diseases became a
16 Commonwealth power and the States could only legislate using “concurrent” legislative powers
17 until the Commonwealth commenced to legislate, as it did with the Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth)
18 that was later replaced by the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth).
19
20 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
21 QUOTE
22 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the
23 Commonwealth legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
24 END QUOTE
25
27 QUOTE
28 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the
29 states will nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.
30 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?
31 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws
32 will, however, remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of
33 making these new laws will be all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
34 END QUOTE
35
37 QUOTE Mr. HOWE.-
38 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
39 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
40 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in the
41 meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
42 END QUOTE
43
44 Meaning that all and any legislation that at the time was enacted by the States within their
45 “concurrent” legislative powers seized to exist whenever the Commonwealth commenced to
46 legislate upon a particular subject matter. The income tax issue was a clear example as the High
47 Court of Australia made this very clear. Yet, the same is with when the Commonwealth
48 legislated as to “land taxation” on 11 November 1910 and yet the States, albeit
49 UNCONSTITUTIONALLY still are legislating as to “land taxation including the
50 unconstitutional purported delegated “council rates”, that the High Court of Australia ruled on in
51 The Municipal of Sydney v Commonwealth in 1904 that a council (Municipal Corporations)
52 has no legislative powers.
53
Page 10
1 If therefore the amended State of Victoria Constitution Act 1855 (UK) was never gazetted then
2 technically the amended State of Victoria Constitution Act 1855 (UK) doesn’t apply and neither
3 so the former amended Colony of Victoria Constitution Act 1855 (UK).
4 And well the purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975 never was within the powers of a
5 “constitutional parliament” to enact without the State electors having approved this by State
6 referendum, regardless if it was gazetted.
7
8 It also means that the number of members of either House of the State of Victoria being in
9 excess of the old Colony of Victoria Constitution Act 1855 (UK) has no legal validity. OK, let
10 have the FRAUD charges against them pursued!
11
13 QUOTE
14 Mr. BARTON.-Our civil rights are not in the hands of any Government, but the
15 rights of the Crown in prosecuting criminals are.
16 END QUOTE
17
18 The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
19 RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
20
22 QUOTE
23 Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
24
25 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law,
26 every member of a state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state
27 Parliament will be a sentry.
28 As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a
29 sentry, and the whole constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
30 END QUOTE
31
32 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
33 Australasian Convention)
34 QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
35 for the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual
36 citizen is entitled to claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and
37 secure to him.
38 END QUOTE
39 .
40 HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
41 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
42 The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its
43 Constitution,
44 END QUOTE
45
47 QUOTE
48 Mr. HIGGINS.-But suppose they go beyond their power?
49
50 Mr. GORDON.-It is still the expression of Parliament. Directly a Ministry seeks to enforce improperly
51 any law the citizen has his right.
52 END QUOTE
53
55 QUOTE

Page 11
1 Mr. SYMON.-What relation has this to customs duties? The industrial life of the state is
2 considered by all of us (subject to this exception, it may be) a thing of purely domestic
3 concern. We do not want to interfere with the domestic life, or with industrial life, except
4 in the last resort. If you are going to introduce such a thing as this it must be the Federal
5 Ministry which will have to decide, subject to the Parliament, and you will introduce the
6 greatest complication and intensity of feeling that was ever seen.
7 Mr. BARTON.-We do not propose to hand over contracts and civil rights to the
8 Federation, and they are intimately allied to this question.
9 END QUOTE
10 .
12 QUOTE
13 Mr. SOLOMON.- We shall not only look to the Federal Judiciary for the protection
14 of our interests, but also for the just interpretation of the Constitution:
15 END QUOTE
16
17 Yes, we ended up with treasonous politicians and their collaborators, terrorism, etc. And the very
18 entities like courts, police, members of parliaments, IBAC, etc in the main appeared to me more
19 interested in betraying their oath of office, etc, then to speak up and stop the rot. Some
20 politicians stood out to speak up but neither Scott Morrison or Anthony Albanese bothered to
21 protect Australians from harm indeed they both were leading the charge as a war against
22 invisible enemy. This, even so no (prime) Minister actually can declare war! This as only a
23 Governor-General can by publishing in the Gazette naming one or more countries in a
24 DECLARATION OF WAR to authorise the Minister for Defence to use Australian armed forces
25 to seek to repel any invaders or in the alternative if any enemy ship was to enter Australian
26 waters then this can be in itself be deemed a DECLARATION OF WAR by enemy forces and
27 then the Minister for Defence can use Australian armed forces to repel any invasion. The sheer
28 and utter nonsense of any (prime) Minister to declare “War against terrorism” or “War against an
29 invisible enemy” is in my view TREASON and TERRORISM!
30
31 While I am not a person to go on protests, nevertheless I recognize that “peaceful”
32 protest cannot be denied. It is a political liberty enshrined in the constitution and no
33 politicians can deny this.
34
36 https://www.scribd.com/document/471720353/20200808-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-
37 Mr-Daniel-Andrews-Premier-of-Victoria-FOI-REQUEST
38
39 QUOTE 20200808-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Daniel Andrews Premier of Victoria-FOI REQUEST-
40 Mr Daniel Andrews Premier 8-8-2020
41 daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
42
43 20200808-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Daniel Andrews Premier of Victoria
44 - FOI REQUEST
45 Sir,
46 as you ought to be aware I have for months been writing about this COVID-19 issue but
47 while at times I receive an automatic reply it appears no real communication was forthcoming
48 from you.
49 My wife Olga is 87 and was last October in hospital for Hearth Failure and has various
50 underlying health conditions. She is very upset that in the years left for her she cannot even now
51 go to a shopping centre to have a meal at a restaurant with me of go to a coffee shop as we used
52 to do. In my view, your conduct is not just grossly irresponsible but absurd and defies her as well
Page 12
1 as mine constitutional rights. In my view, your conduct is that as a constitutional terrorist and
2 needs to be stopped. How on earth can it be in the interest of safety where my wife, who 24/7
3 lives with me cannot be permitted to travel with me to a supermarket as only one person of the
4 household is permitted to do so, but she could (at her expenses of course) travel in a taxi or
5 public transport at great risk to her health to a supermarket.
6 This alone ought to underline how absurd the restrictions are! So, my wife who has problems to
7 walk distances, would have to struggle from a taxi into a shopping centre. Have to walk around,
8 (instead of letting me take some items) and then struggle with a trolley to wait for a taxi, and
9 then somehow return the trolley to the appropriate storage and then walk to the taxi again. And,
10 that is not to say a taxi would be willing to turn up for such a short distance. And, where my wife
11 needs assistance during the shopping who will be there for her? Forget about store personnel as
12 they are about missing for any customer assistance. However, if I were to become a driver to
13 transport people such as drive a taxi, then I could drive my wife to a store but would ordinary not
14 be permitted to accompany her in the shopping as I could then face a reported $5,000 fine, but
15 not is a stranger was to go along with her for the same purpose.
16
17 The following is regarding the USA but may provide some indications that there are questions as
18 to how testing is done, compiled, etc.
19
20 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/if-covid-fatalities-were-90-2-lower-how-would-you-
21 feel-about-schools-reopening/ July 24, 2020
22 If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?
23 QUOTE
24 Some have argued for concern and caution in the 25 to 54 age demographic, which makes logical sense,
25 so let’s look again at the current data available.
26 • More work force age adults, in the 25 to 54 age demographic, have died from pneumonia (9,268) compared
27 to COVID-19 (9,034).
28 • In the 25 to 54 age demographic, there have been 146,663 reported fatalities from all causes.
29 • Thus, COVID-19 fatalities in the 25 to 54 age demographic make up 6.16% of all fatalities. The risk of
30 fatality for COVID-19 is on par with the risk of fatality associated with contracting pneumonia, 6.32% in
31 this age demographic.
32 As encouraging as this data is, we have concerns regarding data collection and reporting that we will discuss
33 below that potentially lowers current fatality counts by 90.2%. It is very possible that state health
34 departments have been instructed by the CDC to over-count COVID fatalities, cases, and hospitalizations,
35 and we will present that evidence shortly.
36 … there is no more significant risk of fatality from contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus than there is for
37 developing pneumonia for teens & young adults.
38 As we have demonstrated in our first 2 research articles, ‘Are Children Really Recovering 99.9584% of the
39 Time From COVID-19,’ and ‘COVID-19…Have You Heard? There Is Good News!’ there is a very real
40 concern for Americans over the age 50 and especially over 65 years of age. Risk of fatality increases
41 substantially for Americans over age 50 with at least 1 of the following comorbidities: Hypertension,
42 Diabetes, Elevated Cholesterol, Kidney Disease, Dementia, Heart Disease. For perspective, according to
43 the CDC, is the risk of dying from pneumonia higher than the risk of dying from COVID-19 in the 55
44 to 64 age demographic?
45 END QUOTE
46
Page 13
1 QUOTE
2 After all, based upon the July 11th data from the CDC’s Provisional COVID-19 Death Counts by Sex, Age &
3 State webpage, if COVID-19 is an epidemic (122,374 Fatalities), then shouldn’t pneumonia (131,372
4 Fatalities) also be an epidemic?
5 Why Did the CDC Decide to Create Unique Reporting Rules for COVID-19 When
6 Successful Reporting Rules Already Existed?
7 A double standard exists for how COVID-19 data is collected and reported versus all other infectious
8 diseases and causes of death. Let’s examine three essential data categories; Fatalities, Cases &
9 Hospitalizations for all infectious diseases because there are significant flaws in what constitutes a COVID-
10 19 case, hospitalization and fatality.
11 On March 24th, the CDC decided to ignore universal data collection and reporting guidelines for fatalities in
12 favor of adopting new guidelines unique to COVID-19. The guidelines the CDC decided against using have
13 been used successfully since 2003.
14 After all, based upon the July 11th data from the CDC’s Provisional COVID-19 Death Counts by Sex, Age &
15 State webpage, if COVID-19 is an epidemic (122,374 Fatalities), then shouldn’t pneumonia (131,372
16 Fatalities) also be an epidemic?1
17 END QUOTE
18
22 QUOTE
23 This is important because the PCR test has been reported to be inaccurate 50% of the time it is used
24 according to Dr. Lee as reported in the International Journal of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation published on
25 July 17th, 2020. In this study, up to 30% of PCR tests resulted in false positives and up to 20% resulted in
26 false negatives, which means that PCR may only be accurate for detection 50% of the time it is used. 18
27 The generally accepted medical standard for lab test accuracy is 95% and above, but in a situation like this
28 70 to 80% would likely be deemed as acceptable by most medical professionals.
29 Additionally, the mere presence of viral nucleic acids does not necessarily indicate active viral infection nor
30 viral replication. Nucleic acid fragments from a viral entity may exist in patient tissues because of
31 immunological destruction of the virus, which is supposed to happen and potentially occurred several weeks
32 prior to specimen collection. What PCR testing may be discovering is not evidence of a current infection, but
33 rather the remnants of a prior infection that the patient has already recovered from.
34 END QUOTE
35
39 QUOTE
40 We may never know. However, when we base our estimates upon the comorbidity data being published by
41 New York, Massachusetts, Georgia, Oklahoma, Utah, Pennsylvania and Iowa the data suggests that
42 accurate fatality rates could drop by approximately 90.2%.
43 How much would using the Medical Examiners’ and Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal
44 Death Reporting rather than the March 24 th NVSS guidelines and the April 14th CSTE position paper
45 completely reshape the way we see COVID-19?
46 How much would it address the fear of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the implications, which so many
47 media outlets have attempted to instilled within us?
48 And would any objective American have any worry for our children’s safety if they knew that pneumonia
49 and influenza have each claimed more lives in the 0 to 14 age demographic than COVID-19?
50 We have serious professional and ethical concerns with empowering people with limited medical
51 training to diagnose any medical condition without examining the prospective patient and reviewing a
52 full health history with them as Contact Tracers are doing.
53 We have serious professional and ethical concerns with hospitals admitting patients as COVID-19 case
54 without definitive evidence.
Page 14
1 We have serious professional and ethical concerns with licensed physicians and nurses being required to
2 classify all hospitalizations as COVID-19, regardless of reason for admission, or if the patient tests positive
3 or is suspected to have contracted the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Making this a requirement prevents trained
4 medical professionals from using their best judgment in determining diagnosis.
5 END QUOTE
6
7 Within the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) the Framers of the
8 constitution embedded legal principles which includes s92 and s117.
9
10 92 Trade within the Commonwealth to be free
11 On the imposition of uniform duties of customs, trade, commerce, and intercourse among the
12 States, whether by means of internal carriage or ocean navigation, shall be absolutely free.
13 But notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, goods imported before the imposition of uniform
14 duties of customs into any State, or into any Colony which, whilst the goods remain therein,
15 becomes a State, shall, on thence passing into another State within two years after the imposition of
16 such duties, be liable to any duty chargeable on the importation of such goods into the
17 Commonwealth, less any duty paid in respect of the goods on their importation.
18
19 117 Rights of residents in States
20 A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any
21 disability or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of
22 the Queen resident in such other State.
23
24 I came across an article:
25 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-02/government-removes-support-for-clive-palmers-push-to-open-
26 border/12515948
27 Commonwealth withdraws from Clive Palmer border case, Prime Minister's letter to WA Premier reveals
28
29 In which it was stated:
30 QUOTE
31 In his letter, dated August 1, Mr Morrison stated that he had "taken into account the changed state of
32 the pandemic", and noted the "high level of concern regarding public health in the Western Australian
33 community".
34 END QUOTE
35 And
36 QUOTE
37 "While taking our constitutional responsibilities seriously in seeking to respect established
38 conventions, I also accept that recent events in the Eastern States, especially Victoria, are creating real
39 concerns to residents in other states less impacted," the Prime Minister wrote.
40 "I do not wish to see these concerns further exacerbated in Western Australia."
41 END QUOTE
42
43 It appears that the Prime Minister somehow perceives some “convention” overrides the
44 provisions of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
45
46 Obviously this is utter and sheer nonsense.
47 .
50 QUOTE Sir HENRY PARKES:
51 The resolutions conclude:
52 An executive, consisting of a governor-general, and such persons as may from time
53 to time be appointed as his advisers, such persons sitting in Parliament, and whose
54 term of office shall depend upon their possessing the confidence of the house of
55 representatives expressed by the support of the majority.
Page 15
1 What is meant by that is simply to call into existence a ministry to conduct the affairs of
2 the new nation as similar as it can be to the ministry of England-a body of constitutional
3 advisers who shall stand as nearly as possible in the same relation to the representative of
4 the Crown here [start page 27] a her Majesty's imperial advisers stand is relation to the
5 Crown directly. These, then, are the principles which my resolutions seek to lay down as a
6 foundation, as I have already stated, for the new super structure, my object being to invite
7 other gentlemen to work upon this foundation so as to best advance the ends we have in
8 view.
9 END QUOTE
10
11 If therefore the Prime Minister or for that any Minister of the Commonwealth, State/Territory
12 cannot grasp what is constitutionally applicable then they shouldn’t be Ministers in the first
13 place. Constitutional terrorism by any Minister or their officials never must be permitted nor
14 condoned.
15 .
17 QUOTE
18 Mr. HIGGINS.-No, because the Constitution is not passed by the Parliament.
19 END QUOTE
20 .
22 QUOTE
23 Mr. GORDON.- The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the Constitution
24 we will have to wipe it out."
25 END QUOTE
26
28 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
29 No one is more in favour of that than I am. But, at the same time, it is said-"Let the Houses of Parliament act
30 capriciously and variously from day to day-allow this 'tacking' to go on if the Houses choose to agree to it-let
31 the Houses do one thing one day and another the next, and do not bother about altering the Constitution, but
32 trust the Parliament." Of course; but Parliament must only be trusted when it is within the Constitution.
33 The Senate of to-day and the House of Representatives must not be put in a position superior to the
34 Constitution.
35 END QUOTE
36
38 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
39
40 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd clause, is
41 intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any quarantine. That simply applies to
42 quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
43 END QUOTE
44
45 The following applies as much to Federal laws of the Commonwealth of Australia as it
46 does to federal laws in the USA; http://familyguardian.tax-
47 tactics.com/Subjects/LawAndGovt/ChallJurisdiction/AuthoritiesArticle/AuthOnJurisdiction.htm
48 QUOTE
49 37 Am Jur 2d at section 8 states, in part: “Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts. Indeed, the
50 principle is often stated, in broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys the validity of everything into
51 which it enters, and that it vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments.”
52 END QUOTE
53 And
54 QUOTE
55 The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes
56 the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be
57 in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail.
Page 16
1 This is succinctly stated as follows:

2 The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no
3 law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its
4 enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal
5 contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it
6 purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
7 Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no
8 rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts
9 performed under it. . .
10 A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede
11 any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is
12 superseded thereby.
13 No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
14 END QUOTE
15
16 QUOTE Quick & Garran
17 LIMITS OF THE POLICE POWERS. – The right of exclusion is founded on the vital necessity of
18 self-defence and self-protection. A State could not exclude persons, animals or merchandise unobjectionable
19 in character, health, and quality, and fit subjects of commerce. (Brimmer v. Rebman, 136 U.S. 78.) In
20 Henderson v. Mayor of New York, 92 U.S. 259, the extent to which a State could exclude paupers and
21 criminals was not clearly decided. A state law which forbids the entrance into the State of person who is not
22 pauper, vagabonds, are criminals, and who are not unsound in body or mind, is not a right exercise of the
23 police power. (State v, Steamship “Constitution” 42 Calif. 579.)
24 END QUOTE
25
26 Hansard 9-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
28 QUOTE
29 Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-The position of my honorable and learned friend (Mr. [start page 2092] Higgins)
30 may be perfectly correct. It may be that without any special provision the practice of the High Court, when
31 declaring an Act ultra vires, would be that such a declaration applied only to the part which trespassed
32 beyond the limits of the Constitution. If that were so, it would be a general principle applicable to the
33 interpretation of the whole of the Constitution.
34 END QUOTE
35 .
37 QUOTE
38 Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultra vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid.
39 END QUOTE
40
41 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-07-28/wa-may-be-forced-to-open-coronavirus-borders-by-high-
42 court/12495046?fbclid=IwAR3lKRwRYyyJnXJjgYhlNaZgOfCmYvt_1aeq5b6DGk46Ro46SF0HNj480oE
43 WA at risk of losing legal bid by Clive Palmer to bring down coronavirus border, Premier admits
44
45 It is important that any reader is not misconceiving a statement that somehow some Health
46 Official can directly/indirectly override our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900
47 (UK). As such, border closures are violating s117 and s92 of the constitution which denies
48 discrimination of citizens of different states. No doctor can justify this either, this as his medical
49 experiences, for what it might be, has absolutely no bearing upon the provisions of the
50 constitution. It would be absurd if some doctor can willy-nilly override constitutional provisions.
51
52 We now had in Victoria the order for anyone to wear a mask, just that my own research indicates
53 there is no such mask existing that protects against “COVID-19”. It therefore is absurd that a
54 Health Official would demand the usage of mask that are not existing let alone available for
55 anyone.
56 My wife’s heart specialist went on leave (being pregnant) and now my wife was unable to obtain
57 a medical exemption certificate not needing to wear a mask. She yesterday tried again 2 different

Page 17
1 kinds and well shortly after that ended up falling ill. This clearly is cruel and I view heartless to
2 inflict upon a woman of her age.
3 .
4 I have over the months extensively written about the COVID-19 issue and provided you with
5 numerous emails with attachments. While you may be blatant ignorant to consider let alone
6 respond to me, nevertheless I view you had ample of time to consider it all. Still you now have
7 even purportedly made a declaration of a disaster of some invisible enemy (as PM Scott
8 Morrison claimed it was).
9 In my view you are the real disaster for engaging in what I view constitutional terrorism with
10 others of your kind.
11 Again:
12 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-07-28/wa-may-be-forced-to-open-coronavirus-borders-by-high-
13 court/12495046?fbclid=IwAR3lKRwRYyyJnXJjgYhlNaZgOfCmYvt_1aeq5b6DGk46Ro46SF0HNj480oE
14 WA at risk of losing legal bid by Clive Palmer to bring down coronavirus border, Premier admits
15
16 Our (federal) constitution is not depending upon you and other politicians having some
17 “convention” to close borders in violation of our constitutional rights as the Framers of the
18 Constitution made clear:
19
22 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
23 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and
24 the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in
25 this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the
26 peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
27 END QUOTE
28 And
30 QUOTE
31 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to commit to the
32 people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to commit this new Magna Charta
33 for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole
34 history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of
35 Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new
36 charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
37 END QUOTE
38
40 QUOTE
41 Mr. HIGGINS.-No, because the Constitution is not passed by the Parliament.
42 END QUOTE
43
44 You may also consider my correspondence “20200801-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to
45 Senator the Hon Richard Colbeck-Minister for Aged Care and Senior Australians & Ors”
46 can be downloaded.
47
48 Let us finally have a proper investigation by all concerned so we really prevent early deaths in nursing
49 homes and other care facilities as well as look better after the doctors, nurses and carers.
50
52 https://www.scribd.com/document/471083981/20200801-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Senator-the-Hon-
53 Richard-Colbeck-Minister-for-Aged-Care-and-Senior-Australians-Ors
54 As well as:
55
56 https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=151356
Page 18
1 July 16, Ty & Charlene Bollinger: '8 “Facts” About Coronavirus That Are Actually Lies'
2
3 My view is that “Stay at Home Directions (Restricted Areas) (No 4) - 22 July 2020” requiring
4 mask to be worn where to my understanding no mask s exist to protect against COVID-19 is an
5 absurdity.
6
7 The Framers if the Constitution embedded this legal principle also in the constitution:
8
10 QUOTE
11 Mr. OCONNOR.-No, it would not; and, as an honorable member reminds me, there is a decision on
12 the point. All that is intended is that there shall be some process of law by which the parties accused must
13 be heard.
14 Mr. HIGGINS.-Both sides heard.
15 Mr. OCONNOR.-Yes; and the process of law within that principle may be [start page 689] anything the
16 state thinks fit. This provision simply assures that there shall be some form by which a person accused will
17 have an opportunity of stating his case before being deprived of his liberty. Is not that a first principle in
18 criminal law now? I cannot understand any one objecting to this proposal.
19 END QUOTE
20 And
22 QUOTE
23 Sir JOHN DOWNER.-Now it is coming out. The Constitution is made for the people and the states on
24 terms that are just to both.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 Hence, the provision of the judiciary is so it can impartially hear and determine issues between a
28 citizen and a government or governments.
29
30 And they also made clear:
32 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
33 I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond
34 the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say
35 that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the
36 Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as
37 any private person would be.
38 END QUOTE
39
40 I do not accept that you can somehow lawfully override constitutional rights and essentially
41 place citizens under house arrest in violation of constitutional provisions!
42
48 the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
49 claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
50 END QUOTE
51
53 QUOTE
55
56 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
57 state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.

Page 19
1 As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
2 constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
3 END QUOTE
4
5 I require you to immediately withdraw this claimed State of disaster and other restrictions so that
6 the LOCKDOWN is to an end and so other restrictions, including all and any border restrictions!
7
8 You claimed that you rely upon science, but I wonder if this is nothing more but “JUNCK
9 SCIENCE” as appears to me just considering the masks issue that requires a mask to be worn
10 where none to my knowledge exists against COVID-19.
11 .
12 In my view you are in violation of s44 of the Constitution as the States created within s106
13 “subject to this constitution” then State Members of Parliament also then must avoid any
14 conflicts as federal Members of Parliament are bound by. Any dealing with the Chinese
15 Government I view therefore may invalidate you being a Member of Parliament where this
16 places you under certain obligations, etc.
17
18 Yes vulnerable people are dying in nursing homes and hospitals but the question is what really is
19 causing their deaths? Terrorising the community to unconstitutionally restrict their movements to
20 me is totally unacceptable.
21 I do not accept that you can unilaterally be allowed to destroy the life work of many Victorians
22 by shutting down their businesses for an “invisible enemy”.
23 In my view the provision of “acquisition” regarding the commonwealth likewise must be deemed
24 to apply to the States and as such those who at no fault lost their businesses should be
25 appropriately compensated.
26
28 QUOTE
29 Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by the Parliament of
30 the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in effect, because the provisions of this
31 Constitution, the principles which it embodies, and the details of enactment by which those principles
32 are enforced, will all have been the work of Australians.
33 END QUOTE
34
35 In my view the disaster is what you are about lacking proper leadership and may very well have
36 resulted either directly or indirectly to uncalled death.
37 “QUARANTINE” is Commonwealth legislative powers when it comes to “man-kind”
38 infectious diseases other than if a particular person if held to be infected and the State then can
39 apply for the court to issue orders appropriate in the circumstances. But, it must always be an
40 impartial Administration of justice the Letters patent published on 2 January 1901 provided for.
41 No such thing as incarcerating/imprisoning health persons without any court order.
42
43 As you may recall I in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka challenged the “compulsory” part of voting in
44 political elections and on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both appeals. Underlining that I have
45 succeeded in the past on constitutional issues.
46 I can assure you that I prefer to spend my limited time preferable with my wife however, if you
47 fail to act appropriately then I view there is no alternative but to litigate in the courts.
48
49 The article I referred to above
53
Page 20
1 Indicates that up to 90.2% of claimed cases might be falsely claimed. In any event the details
2 relied upon indicates that there are more Influenza deaths then CODI-19 attributed deaths and no
3 LOCKDOWN and other restrictions (not that I seek to imply they are appropriate ) have been
4 applied regarding Influenza and “common cold” deaths.
5 As I understand it COVID-19 is a member of the coronaviruses that includes “common cold”
6 and “Influenza” and anyone who had immunization against a virus in the past may still show
7 antibodies and so falsely be deemed positive for COVID-19.
8
9 I understand that in
10 https://cairnsnews.org/2018/11/19/u-s-govt-loses-landmark-vaccine-lawsuit/?wref=tp
11 U.S. GOVT LOSES LANDMARK VACCINE LAWSUIT
12 It was exposed that no record exist of any safety checks having been made for the last 30 years
13 as to vaccinations issues.
14
15 Yet, I understand doctors in Australia continue to claim that vaccines are safe. Hence, where to
16 have allowed I understand “compulsory”/forced vaccination of people in care such as nursing
17 homes, etc, I request therefore of all relevant details you relied upon that indeed vaccinations
18 were checked for any adverse effects, etc.
19
20 I understand from:
21 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-02/victoria-coronavirus-state-of-disaster-explained/12516570
22 Victoria has enacted a state of disaster to enforce coronavirus restrictions. Here's what that means
23 QUOTE
24 During a year of disasters, it's now being enacted to respond to the coronavirus crisis, which Premier
25 Daniel Andrews said was "wildly infectious and absolutely dynamic".
26 "This is a public health bushfire, but you can't smell the smoke and you can't see the flames. This is
27 very different, it is a wicked enemy," he said.
28 END QUOTE
29 And
32 QUOTE
33 It also gives the Government the power to suspend other Acts of Parliament if it appears it "would
34 inhibit response to or recovery from the disaster".
35 END QUOTE
36
37 It is my view that regardless what the Victorian Parliament may have enacted there can be no
38 powers for a Government to suspend any Act of Parliament. So to say, the servant cannot
39 overrule the master. Neither do I accept that the parliament can be suspended during any
40 Declaration of Emergency/Disaster (without seeking to imply that such declaration has any
41 constitutional validity) as the Boris Johnson (PM of the UK - in the BREXIT issue) case proved
42 that even where Her majesty had signed to Prorogue the parliament it was held to be
43 unconstitutional as it would prevent the Parliament to have an oversight of the Government of
44 the Day.
45 Therefore there must be oversight by the parliament during the entire claimed declaration of
46 Emergency/Disaster.
47
49 Victoria has enacted a state of disaster to enforce coronavirus restrictions. Here's what that means QUOTE
50 Emergency Services Minister Lisa Neville said the state of disaster would put beyond doubt the powers
51 of police to enforce health directives and shut down protests
52 END QUOTE
53 And
55 Victoria has enacted a state of disaster to enforce coronavirus restrictions. Here's what that means QUOTE
Page 21
1 During the COVID-19 pandemic, Ms Neville suggested it would enable police to prevent all protests or
2 move along crowds at settings like supermarkets if physical-distancing rules were not being followed.
3 END QUOTE
4
5 Neither do I accept that the Emergency Service Minister (whom ever it might be at the time) can
6 allow the police to shut down any protest.
7 The States within Section 106 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
8 are created “subject to this constitution” and therefore all legal principles embedded in the
9 federal constitution are applicable to the States.
10 .
13 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
14 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and
15 the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in
16 this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the
17 peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
18 END QUOTE
19 And
21 QUOTE
22 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to commit to the
23 people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to commit this new Magna Charta
24 for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole
25 history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of
26 Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new
27 charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
28 END QUOTE
29
31 QUOTE
32 Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by the Parliament of
33 the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in effect, because the provisions of this
34 Constitution, the principles which it embodies, and the details of enactment by which those principles
35 are enforced, will all have been the work of Australians.
36 END QUOTE
37
43 the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
44 claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
45 END QUOTE
46
48 QUOTE
50
51 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
52 state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.
53 As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
54 constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
55 END QUOTE
56
57 It is therefore clear that an Emergency Service Minister cannot override the federal constitution
58 to shut down a protest.
59 .
Page 22
3 QUOTE
4 But the Act doesn't allow the Minister to give the ADF additional enforcement powers.
5 END QUOTE
6
7 My past writings provided to you made it very clear that the ADF cannot in any manner enforce
8 State laws and indeed border closures by the states violate s117 of the constitution as well as s92
9 where it interferes with trade and commerce.
10
13 QUOTE
14 Mr Andrews said while states of disaster and emergency could operate independently, they worked
15 best together, and he had advice that conditions had been met to trigger them.
16 END QUOTE
17
18 As you refer to “advice” I therefore require you to provide me all relevant details of that advice.
19 .
20 I on 7 August 2020 wrote to Mr Clive Palmer that I am willing to substitute him in current legal
21 proceedings against WA and I would broaden the matter to include all State/Territories as well as
22 the Commonwealth on basis of it being a “public interest” matter.
23
24 It would therefore be essential that the requested details/documents/information, etc, is provided
25 to me so I can set out for the court why I view the restrictions were unjustified, a misuse of
26 power and violations of constitutional rights.
27
28 I make it clear that in any event since COVID-19 was made known in the media have done a
29 considerable research in posts, articles and videos and I understand:
30
31 Virologist made clear that COVID-19 is not infectious.
32 Pathologist made clear that there is a consensus amongst pathologist (Italy, France, Spain, etc)
33 that no one died from COVID-19 but died “with” COVID-19.
34
35 I understand that no one has actually been able to separate the alleged COVID-19 as it is all so to
36 say an illusion of the mind. Obviously, you relying upon medical experts will be able to provide
37 me with your evidence as to justify the claimed Emergency/Disaster.
38
39 I understand that after the “Stay at Home Directions (Restricted Areas) (No 4) - 22 July 2020”
40 was issued thereafter some days later it was announced that masks with ventilators are not to be
41 used, etc. To me this indicates that the directions were issued without proper research!
42 In my view, no mask exist in the entire world that has been manufactured to protect against any
43 infection of COVID-19. This doesn’t mean to imply I accept there is an infectious disease called
44 COVID-19!
45
46 In my view (apart of the question of legal validity) the Directions also failed to be appropriately
47 in the circumstances.
48
49 For example: My 87 year old wife was last year in hospital for Heart Failure and other
50 underlying medical issues and cannot drive a motor vehicle.
51 It appears that by the directions you issued only one person in a household can go shopping.
52 It means that if my wife wanted to go shopping to purchase certain items she would have to get a
53 taxi cab to drive her to and from the shopping centre but as she is limited to walk about 100
Page 23
1 metres she would have problems to move about with a trolley. And even after shopping would
2 try to find a cab, load the cab and then somehow return the trolley to a trolley stand and than
3 walk back to the taxi. Obviously, the taxi will charge for the duration of this also. Effectively
4 you utter and sheer nonsense of directions would prevent me as her husband to drive her to the
5 shops as we are accustomed to do and you virtually imprison my wife in the last few years she
6 may still be able to live. And, that is your perception of the best for the community? When did
7 you have a brain scan, I wonder.
8 My wife, last year, discovered a likes for baking cakes after I commented after her first cake that
9 I actually like eating cakes. So at times she bakes one day after day.
10 But now with restrictions there appears to be a limit not only on purchasing certain items but
11 even as to the time a person could spend away from home. With her ability to move about and
12 needing to sit down from time to time to rest you have reportedly this draconic 1 hours limit.
13 Considering my wife may at times take 10 of 15 minutes just to get in or get out of the car then
14 this too is another absurdity. Again, did you ever have a brain scan?
15 .
16 I last Thursday went driving about from Viewbank, via Watsonia and Thomastown to Reservoir.
17 After that I went to Bundoora and then back to McDonalds in Thomastown and then got gas and
18 after that again to Reservoir. From there I went to Bunnings to purchase a O-ring for the kitchen
19 water tap, which needs to be done on the special orders desk, but I was refused not being a trady.
20 What an absurdity. Apparently your dictatorship for this. I view unconstitutional. Anyhow I then
21 went to the bank in Bundoora and after that I went shopping at Coles and then Aldi (which had
22 no eggs) and from there to Aldi in Lower Plenty as my wife needed eggs to bake further cakes. I
23 during the trip at no time wore any mask! A police car did stop right next to me in Reservoir but
24 at no time did the police stop me or question me about my doing. Then again, it is none of their
25 business as I am entitled to exercise my constitutional rights.
26 .
27 I did notice, even so I do generally never watch television, on a video someone direct me to that
28 the police had been smashing car windows and the Chief Commissioner of Police had something
29 to say about people claiming to be “sovereign citizens”. It appears to me that this Chief
30 Commissioner of Police needs an education on constitutional law. He may hold it derogative for
31 anyone to claim to be a “sovereign citizen” but reality is that any person residing in the
32 Commonwealth of Australia is a “sovereign citizen” because only the citizens when electors can
33 vote to amend a constitution. And where a “sovereign citizen” objects to a law that this
34 “sovereign citizen” hold is unconstitutional then as I proved in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka on 19 July
35 2006 succeeding in both appeals when representing myself, that indeed any legislation or better
36 to state purported legislation that violates the constitution will be when a “sovereign citizen”
37 object be ULTRA VIRES Ab Initio unless and until if ever at all a court of competent
38 jurisdiction declare it to be INTRA VIRES.
39 A “sovereign citizen” is compelled to comply with any law that is within constitutional
40 legislative powers.
41
42 For example, in Sydney Council v Commonwealth the High Court of Australia in 1904 declared
43 that council rates were a delegated State land tax power.
44 On 11 November 1910 the Commonwealth commenced to provide for the Land Tax Office (the
45 forerunner of the ATO) and by this it wiped out the State legislative powers to charge land
46 taxation and also municipal/shire councils no longer could apply the delegated land taxation
47 powers as “council rates”.
48 While this has been broadly ignored reality is that time will come to have this out before the
49 courts. After all on what legal basis is the State charging State land taxation where it has no such
50 legislative powers, let alone the municipal/shire councils have any such powers to charge the so
51 called “council rates”?
Page 24
1
2 And, before you get carried away of having powers within the 1975 Constitution Act (Vic) let
3 me make it very clear there exist no such constitution. It is merely an Act of Parliament and by
4 the federation colonies gave up their sovereign powers to create and/or amend their constitutions.
5
6 And, do keep in mind that “Australian citizenship” is not, that is constitutionally, a nationality, as
7 it can only be obtained in one manner and that is when a person obtains “State citizenship” and
8 well I understand no State has any State Citizenship legislation to provide for this.
9
10 http://tex.parliament.vic.gov.au/bin/texhtmlt?form=jVicHansard.dumpall&db=hansard91&dodraft=0&house=ASSE
11 MBLY&speech=23716&activity=Second+Reading&title=SAFE+DRINKING+WATER+BILL&date1=7&date2=
12 May&date3=2003&query=true%0a%09and+%28+data+contains+'safe'%0a%09and+data+contains+'water'+%29
13 QUOTE
14 Mr ANDREWS (Mulgrave) - It is a pleasure to speak in support of the Safe Drinking
15 Water Bill. This bill forms part of the government's strategic approach to water
16 management, with specific attention being paid to water quality and risk management as
17 matters of public health. It is worth noting that this is a debate about public health and
18 about making sure that each community across our state has access to the highest quality
19 water. It is also worth noting that this bill has been introduced by the Minister for Health as
20 a matter of public health.
21 The bill has four specific objectives. Before going on to those I welcome the support
22 shown by the Liberal and National parties for this bill. Every endeavour has been made to
23 try to provide as much information as possible.
24 END QUOTE
25
26 Yet, GWMWater so to say has thumped its nose upon this and does as it likes.
27 As I understand it by 2004 it had no provisions to supply “Safe Drinking Water” to many
28 regional area’s including Berriwillock (where I have a property). By 2005 it still didn’t have Safe
29 Drinking Water to Berriwillock. By 2006 it still didn’t have any Safe Drinking water to
30 Berriwillock and one may question then what on earth is going on where a water service
31 provider can so to say thump its nose upon legislative provisions? Then so GWMWater seems to
32 claim it obtained an exclusion in 2007 and which was since then allegedly extended til about
33 2018 that it doesn’t have to provide Safe Drinking Water, albeit I understand this was obtained
34 by deception.
35 .
36 As I understand it GWMWater obtained the 2007 exemption upon the basis that people may
37 mistakenly hold they were provided with Safe Drinking Water instead of “untreated water”.
38 Obviously, there can be no part of mistake by any consumer if the legislation provided that since
39 2004 they were entitled to Safe Drinking Water by the provisions of the Safe Drinking Water
40 Act 2003. As such if the exemption was obtained by falsehood then the further extension
41 remains also without legal force.
42
43 And you have the gall to claim to act in the interest of the community when the crops are being
44 poisoned with untreated toxic water that then get into the food chain while those residing in parts
45 of the Mallee are denied “Safe Drinking Water”?
46
47 So, I contemplate to litigate in the courts about matters and obviously will require to pursue any
48 further evidence for the litigation both from you and from other persons. My rights under the
49 constitution cannot be denied to prepare for a litigation case.
50 I recommend that if you got an Emergency Minister who doesn’t seems to me to understand
51 what are State legislative powers and what not then you better get a more competent person in
52 the job.

Page 25
1 You may have blatantly ignored my past writings, that was your choice, but when it comes to
2 legal proceedings, as often opponents discovered, ignorance is no excuse.
3 In my view this entire fiasco regarding the hotel, the so claimed Emergency/Disaster could have
4 been avoided had there been proper leadership instead of “leadership missing in action”.
5 In my view, many a person may have died due to your gross incompetence and that I view is a
6 very serious matter. Have you ever bothered to ask those who advice you if they really knew
7 what they were parroting? Or did they so to say led you by the nose knowing you wouldn’t
8 bother to check and verify details.
9 In my view the police are acting like thugs to enforce your unconstitutional terrorism and that
10 must stop!
11 I in 2017 was asked to investigate the murder of Carl Williams and it appeared to me that the
12 Police concealed details that it may have actually set up his murder. Well in December 2018 a
13 former police officer smashed a new (private) fence I was building (within the boundary of my
14 property) and well he made clear the police wouldn’t even bother to investigate him. And, well
15 the police proved this to be so. This, even so I at the time provided all relevant details to the then
16 Chief Commissioner of Police. Is this the police we have to respect? For what?
17
18 Even if you decide not to cancel/withdraw the LOCKDOWNS and other unconstitutional
19 restrictions then I request within the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act to provide me
20 free of charge all and any relevant details/documents/information, etc, upon which you relied to
21 make the decisions that resulted in the LOCKDOWNS, restrictions, etc, including the “science”
22 you relied upon and the “science “ the health officials relied upon as to warrant the demand to
23 wear a mask, etc.
24 I would require those details/documents, information, etc, so that I can prepare relevant details to
25 institute legal proceedings against violations of my wife and mine constitutional rights.
26 I am a pensioner and so it would be appropriate for remission of any fees, in particular as this is a
27 matter of “PUBLIC INTEREST”.
28
29 You may perhaps come to the conclusion that it would be better to litigate matters as some test
30 case so that if there is/was any wrongdoing this can at least be addressed and not continue to go
31 on and on. Do not hesitate to contact me if you desire to seek some consensus as to best prepare
32 the case for litigation, as I am always open to suggestions, even if in the end I might have a
33 different end conclusion.
34
35 I in the above have not disclosed my pension number (as this document will be published for
36 others to read also) but that can always be provided if needed, albeit the Department should have
37 it already on its records.
38
39 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
40
41 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
42
43 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
44 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

45 (Our name is our motto!)
46 END QUOTE 20200808-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Daniel Andrews Premier of Victoria-FOI REQUEST-
47
48
49 Also consider:

Page 26
1 1974/12/10 – Secretary of State Henry Kissenger’s national

2 Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) study
3 completed as the Kissinger Report, establishing global
4 depopulation as US geopolitical strategy.
5
6 1975/11/26 – President Gerald Ford endorsed the Kissinger Report’s

7 depopulation plan through National Security Decision Memorandum 314
8
9 In my view IBAC itself must be deemed responsible for failing to investigate matters when I
10 lodged my complaint in April 2020 and a proper impartial investigation should be held. After all,
11 had IBAC shown a real interest and consideration then more than likely my son Mark may never
12 have ended up with the jabs!
13
14 I understand that former federal Minister for Health Greg Hunt seeks to claim that he wasn't
15 aware of certain MANDATES applied in the State of Victoria, albeit the Biosecurity Act
16 2015 (Cth) makes clear that as Minister he could not delegate to anyone. As such by him
17 allowing then Premier Daniel Andrews to do what he did, and the court now seem to hold it was
18 unlawful
19
20 Former Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton appears to be given Victorian of the year award and
21 this for what? For participating in the mass murder of many Victorians to enforce jabs even
22 using the Victorian Police?
23
24 in November 2023 the High Court of Australia in my view beyond its judicial powers ordered
25 certain illegal immigrants to be released.
26
27 QUOTE 20231118-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus-National Security
28 issues-Supplement 1
29 Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus 18-11-2023
30 Email attorney@ag.gov.au,
31
32 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
33 Re National Security issues-Supplement 1
34 Sir,
35 it appears to me that the High Court of Australia has set itself up to be another political party
36 governing from the bench rather than to remain impartial and adjudicate within the
37 confines of the legal principles embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia
38 Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
39
40 In my view the Commonwealth of Australia likewise is entitled to deny entry/evict a person who
41 is TRESPASSING and refuse to leave then to incarcerate until the person complies to
42 leave As set out below each person failing to leave is not indefinitely incarcerated as the
43 person so to say had/has “the key to his prison cell” by simply leaving as lawfully
44 required!
45 What I view is scandalous is that the High Court of Australia may take months to hand-down a
46 reason of judgment and by this deny the general community to be aware why it handed
47 down orders which may be ill conceived in any case. It also denies the Parliament to have
48 proper knowledge as to what the court used to hand down its orders and how within
Page 27
1 constitutional provisions it may legislate to address certain issues, this in particular where
2 the court now appears to have overruled it past decision. I as a constitutionalist am
3 concerned that the decision may have been ill conceived and may be a failure to remain
4 within judicial powers and may have trespassed upon the powers of the Parliament to
5 legislate. It is not upon the court, as it did in past judgments violating the separation of
6 powers and I have set out below some issues. It may even result for the court having
7 scored an own goal, as it now no longer either can incarcerate a person indefinitely on the
8 basis that the prisoner has the key to his own cell door, and can leave if complying to a
9 court order. In my view it is well over due that court are limited and subject to legislative
10 provisions that when a court holds a person in contempt of court it then too cannot order
11 the person to remain incarcerated unless the person complies with a court order as one
12 cannot have DOUBLE STANDARDS.
13
14 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12727823/Refugee-raped-boy-Australia-High-Court-ruling.html
15 Paedophile refugee who raped a 10-year-old boy can stay in Australia after landmark High
16 Court ruling against indefinite detention - as advocates celebrate 'important' victory
17
18 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12750903/Asylum-seeker-hotel-Sydney-High-Court.html
19 Welcome from freedom hotel: Asylum seeker who is one of the 83 'hardened criminals' freed
20 by High Court ruling goes berserk when approached at drab motel in Sydney suburbia - that
21 YOU are paying for
22 QUOTE
23 A cheap motel on a highway in Sydney's west is the new home for nine asylum seekers
24 freed from detention by a controversial High Court decision.
25 Last weekend the men were driven from Villawood Immigration Detention Centre to the
26 drab three-storey building near a service station and fast food outlet.
27 They are among 83 asylum seekers who have been let out into the community after
28 the High Court found on November 8 that their indefinite detention was unlawful.
29 They will support themselves with at least $550 a fortnight from the Government's Status
30 Resolution Support Service as well as being provided with free Medicare.
31 Three of those released are murderers, one of whom killed a pregnant woman in Malaysia,
32 and another was previously jailed for raping a 10-year-old boy in Sydney.
33 The government has said the released detainees will be strictly monitored. Opposition
34 leader Peter Dutton has described those released by the ruling as 'hardcore criminals'.
35 Daily Mail Australia approached several residents at the motel who were wandering freely
36 around the grounds on Wednesday and was met with a barrage of abuse.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 The underlying problem with the High Court of Australia is that as it appears to me lawyers are
40 appointed to be judges who do not appear to me to have a clue what the true meaning and
41 application of the legal principles embedded in the constitution are. It is in my view like going to
42 a kindergarten and appoint a child to be a brain surgeon in a hospital.
43 I have been very outspoken in the past about what I consider TREASON by judges of the High
44 Court of Australia such as in Sue v Hill and other cases.
45 Let us consider the intentions of the Framers of the Constitution!
46
48 QUOTE
49 Sir JOHN FORREST.-What is a citizen? A British subject?
50 Mr. WISE.-I presume so.
51 Sir JOHN FORREST.-They could not take away the rights of British subjects.
52 Mr. WISE.-I do not think so. I beg to move- That the words "each state" be omitted, with
53 the view of inserting the words "the Commonwealth."
Page 28
1 I apprehend the Commonwealth must have complete power to grant or

2 refuse citizenship to any citizen within its borders. I think my answer to Sir John Forrest
3 was given a little too hastily when I said that every citizen of the British Empire must be
4 a citizen of the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth will have power to determine who
5 is a citizen. I do not think Dr. Quick's amendment is necessary. If we do not put in a
6 definition of citizenship every state will have inherent power to decide who is a
7 citizen. That was the
8 decision of the Privy Council in Ah Toy's case.
9 Sir JOHN FORREST.-He was an alien.
10 Mr. WISE.-The Privy Council decided that the Executive of any colony had an
11 inherent right to determine who should have the rights of citizenship within its
12 borders.
13 Mr. KINGSTON.-That it had the right of keeping him out.
14 END QUOTE
15 END QUOTE 20231118-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus-National
16 Security issues-Supplement 1
17
18 It now appears that the Federal Government has possibly decided to use my writings to seek to
19 reverse or at least limit the High Court of Australia 2023 ruling considering also the harm
20 inflicted upon Australians.
21 I respect any lawyer who act professionally and bother to put his client legal rights as a priority,
22 however it always must be subject to the legal principles embedded in the constitution, not
23 despite of it. In my view it is cruel to give a client false and misleading information and to go
24 through expensive litigation merely for a lawyer to make a dollar.
25
26 Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
27 Convention)
29 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
30 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
31 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
32 END QUOTE
33
34 Now consider it in proper context as to what the High Court of Australia referred to versus what
35 the Framers of the Constitution made clear relating to “QUARANTINE” regarding humans:
36
37 https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2021/5.html
38 Palmer v Western Australia [2021] HCA 5 (24 February 2021)
39 QUOTE EDELMAN J.
40 291. By contrast, the purpose of public health provisions such as ss 56 and 67 is
41 plainly sufficient to justify even the deep and wide burden that the application of
42 those provisions can place upon the freedom prescribed by s 92. Indeed, at federation
43 it was contemplated that the application of provisions of this nature might be justified
44 despite the imposition of such deep or wide burdens. During the Sydney debates,
45 after one of the delegates, Dr Cockburn, expressed a fear that the clause as drafted
46 might prevent laws prohibiting the passing of cattle across State borders or the
47 introduction of diseased vines into South Australia, Mr O'Connor, quoting from a
48 prolific writer from the United States[465], set out a good description of the
49 operation of structured proportionality in this area[466]:
50
51 "By parity of reason addressed to the protection of the public health, states may exercise their
52 police powers to the extent of prohibiting both persons and animals, when labouring under
Page 29
1 contagious diseases, from entering their territory. They may pass any sanitary laws deemed
2 necessary for this purpose, and enforce them by appropriate regulations. It is upon this
3 reserved right of self-protection, that quarantines are permitted to interfere with the freedom
4 of commerce and of human intercourse. But this power is not without its limitations, and its
5 exercise must be restricted to directly impending dangers to health, and not to those who are
6 only contingent and remote. Hence, while diseased persons or diseased animals, and those
7 presumedly so from contact with infected bodies or localities, may be prevented from entering
8 a state, any general law of exclusion, measured by months, or operating in such a way as to
9 become a barrier to commerce or travel, would be a regulation of commerce forbidden by the
10 constitution. Such a statute being more than a quarantine regulation, transcends the legitimate
11 powers of a state."
12
13 292. Subsequently, Mr Barton said, in terms reflecting the first stage of structured
14 proportionality, that "the power to prevent the introduction of diseases would still
15 remain with the states, except in so far as any state law was found to be an
16 intentional derogation from the freedom of trade"[467].
17 END QUOTE EDELMAN J.
18
19 Now let us check out the transcript itself:
20
21 The latter quote I view was taken out of context and for this I below set it out showing that the
22 part quotation in 292 actually related to animals. The part “and of human intercourse” in my
23 view was in violation of S51(ix) and S117 of the constitution.
24
25 Official Record of the Debates of the Australasian Federal Convention (Sydney), 22
26 September 1897 at 1062.
27 QUOTE
28 The Hon. R.E. O'CONNOR (New South Wales)[12.42]: It may be interesting for the hon.
29 and learned member, Dr. Cockburn, to hear this very concise statement of the law of the
30 United States, which would be exactly applicable to this proposed constitution, and very
31 much on the lines that the hon. and learned member, Mr. Isaacs, has just stated. I am citing
32 from a well-known book, Ordronaux's "Constitutional Legislation." At page 296 he says
33 this:
34 By, parity of reason addressed to the protection of the public health, states may exercise
35 their police powers to the extent of prohibiting both persons and animals, when labouring
36 under contagious diseases, from entering their territory. They may pass any sanitary laws
37 deemed necessary for this purpose, and enforce them by appropriate regulations. It is upon
38 this reserved right of self-protection that quarantines are permitted to interfere with the
39 freedom of commerce and of human intercourse. But this power is not without its
40 limitations, and its exercise must be restricted to directly impending dangers to health, and
41 not to those who are only contingent and remote. Hence, while diseased persons or
42 diseased animals, and those presumedly so from contact with infected bodies or. localities,
43 may be prevented from entering a state, any general law of exclusion, measured by
44 months, or operating in such a way as to become a barrier to commerce or travel, would be
45 a regulation of commerce forbidden by the constitution. Such a statute being more than a
46 quarantine regulation, transcends the legitimate powers of a state.
47 So it is quite clear that all the powers are left in the state, which are necessary for
48 the preservation of the health of the inhabitants and of the property by the state.
49 Those powers would include power to deal with such diseases in the vegetable world as the
50 hon. and learned member; Dr. Cockburn, has spoken of, and also with animal diseases. It
51 was suggested in Adelaide that these powers might be used in such a way as to have a
52 protective influence in favour of certain states.
Page 30
1
2 Mr. Symon: That would be in conflict with the constitution!
3
4 The Hon. R.E. O'CONNOR: I was going to point that out. There are a number of
5 decisions in America, as has been pointed out by my hon. and learned friend, in
6 which on that very ground or similar grounds it has been held that the law, not being
7 a bona fide exercise of the police powers, is not within the powers of the state. Of
8 course, there is another question behind all that, which I think is a very important one, that
9 is, considering the immense traffic, say, in cattle, that there is right across this continent,
10 the infrequency of habitation, and the difficulties of enforcing the quarantine laws from
11 state to state, whether such a disease, for instance, as the tick disease should be dealt with
12 by the authority of the commonwealth instead of by the states themselves. It is a very
13 important question, and there are many difficulties in the way of its being dealt with by the
14 federal authority. One of the chief of them is, I think, the impossibility of the federal
15 authority administering an act of that kind without having an enormous array of officials
16 and immense expenditure. As we all know, there are in each colony laws-affecting
17 contagious diseases of cattle or sheep, and they are all administered by local bodies, The
18 machinery and administration are simple, and the laws are cheaply worked in the various
19 districts themselves. But if you place them under the federal movement, to be operated
20 by federal officers, you render an [start page 1063] immense machinery necessary to
21 carry out the very simple objects which are carried out by the local bodies at the
22 present time. It appears to me that the balance of reason is in favour of leaving things as
23 they are, leaving power in the states to deal with all those matters that come under the head
24 of police powers in the United States, the infection of animals, the infection of vegetables,
25 the introduction of, animal and vegetable diseases. There is ample power to deal with
26 them, and I think that the matter might be left in that way.
27
28 The CHAIRMAN: I would point out that there is no question of quarantine or
29 quarantine regulations before the Committee.
30
31 The Hon. Dr. COCKBURN (South Australia)[12.47]: I think we should renew this debate
32 at some future period. In reply to the hon. and learned member, Mr. O'Connor, I may say
33 that I am not at all sure that our proposed constitution does not go further in reference-to
34 free-trade between the states than the American Constitution does, and therefore, it might
35 require some further provision in view of the very strong words which it contains, although
36 such a provision might not be necessary in America. Words simply prohibiting the
37 introduction of actual disease would not be sufficient. I admit that the decision which has
38 been quoted relates also to anything that has been in contact with any disease in anyway.
39 But it would be necessary in many cases actually to prohibit the introduction of all cattle
40 and all vegetables of a certain character. If Queensland were to relax her local
41 quarantine regulations, it might be necessary for the adjoining colony to prohibit a single
42 hoof of cattle from crossing the border, and this might be held to be an absolute derogation
43 from freedom of trade, unless there were special provision in the constitution dealing with
44 it. It might be necessary for South Australia to prevent the importation of any portion of a
45 vine, and this might be said to seriously derogate from freedom of trade between the
46 colonies. I ask the Drafting Committee to be exceedingly careful in the matter. I think the
47 power does not exist, and I am sure that it should exist for otherwise we should find that
48 the opposition to this constitution bill, if it is assumed that there is no such power given,
49 would be of a very fierce and vehement character.
50

Page 31
1 Mr. HIGGINS (Victoria)[12.49]: I think that I can reassure the hon. and learned member
2 to some extent. He has raised an important point, and I do not think that we should reserve
3 these important points until we meet in Melbourne, but should settle them now if we can
4 do so.
5
6 The Hon. E. BARTON: In how many weeks? We have not finished one provision in
7 two and a half hours!
8
9 Mr. HIGGINS: But this is one of the most important parts of the bill. I think it is our
10 duty, not to have tentative solutions, but to make the best solution we can, and I feel, now
11 that this question has been raised, it is our duty to devote ourselves to it. The hon. member
12 is quite right in saying that the proposed bill goes further in the direction of providing for
13 free intercourse and freedom of trade between the states than does the American
14 Constitution. It goes much further.
15
16 An HON. MEMBER: By reason of the general words in clause 89. It is proposed to
17 eliminate those words!
18
19 Mr. HIGGINS: Yes; I made a note of that. It is perfectly clear that under the American
20 Constitution a state can make a law preventing the sale within its own borders of animals
21 having any disease, and to prevent the introduction of such animals, into its territory.
22
23 The Hon. Dr. COCKBURN: There is no doubt about that!
24
25 Mr. HIGGINS: The hon. and learned member is quite right in saying that if clause
26 89 remains as it is the states of the [start page 1064] Australasian commonwealth will
27 have no such power. A good example of the application of this law in America is given at
28 page 104 of Baker's "Annotated Constitution of the United States":
29 The statute of Minnesota approved April 16th, 1889, entitled " An act for the protection
30 of the public health, by providing for inspection, before slaughtering of cattle, sheep,
31 and swine designed for slaughter for human food" is unconstitutional and void in so far
32 as it requires, as a condition of sales in Minnesota of fresh beef, veal, mutton, lamb, or
33 pork for human food, that the animals from which such meats are taken shall have been
34 inspected in that state before being slaughtered. The inspection thus provided for is of such
35 a character, or is burdened with such conditions, as will prevent the introduction into the
36 state of sound meats, the product of animals slaughtered in other states.
37 To make an inspection law was prima facie within the powers of the state of Minnesota;
38 but the state legislature went beyond its powers in enacting an act which provided for an
39 inspection of such a character as to interfere with the sale in Minnesota of meat brought
40 from other states, Under the bill, as it stands, measures to prevent the introduction of tick
41 will be beyond the powers of the states to enact. Under the American Constitution, full
42 power is given to provide against the introduction of tick into a state; but if in preventing
43 the introduction of tick or other disease, an undue interference with the course of trade is
44 created, which protects one state against the other states, the courts will interfere, and say
45 that the law is unconstitutional and void. I think that the course of leaving this matter to the
46 Drafting Committee to consider is the correct one.
47
48 The Hon. E. BARTON (New South Wales)[12.53]: I intimated a little earlier -I do not
49 know that the hon. and learned member, Dr. Cockburn, heard me-that I intended to make
50 clause 89 read in this way:

Page 32
1 So soon as uniform duties of customs have been imposed, trade and intercourse
2 throughout the commonwealth is not to be restricted or interfered with by any taxes,
3 charges, or imposts.
4 If this amendment is made, the matter maybe considered in connection with clause 99,
5 which provides that:
6 All powers which at the establishment of the commonwealth are vested in the
7 parliaments of the several colonies, and which are not by this constitution exclusively
8 vested in the parliament of the commonwealth, or withdrawn from the parliaments of
9 the several states, are reserved to, and shall remain vested in, the parliaments of the
10 states respectively.
11 At the present time this power exists in all the states; but if the amendments I have
12 suggested be carried the prohibition of the importation of diseased animals or plants will
13 not be a matter of taxes, charges, or imposts. Therefore, the power to prevent the
14 introduction of diseases would still remain with the states, except in so far as any state
15 law was found to be an intentional derogation from the freedom of trade. I think that if
16 we amend clause 89 in the way I suggest the object of the hon. and learned member, Dr.
17 Cockburn, will be met; but if it is not met I will undertake to deal with the matter in any
18 way that he suggests.
19
20 The Hon. Dr. COCKBURN: I am quite satisfied!
21
22 The Hon. I.A. ISAACS (Victoria)[12.56]: Will the hon. and learned member also take
23 note in this connection of the concluding words of clause 95? That clause must be brought
24 into accord with clause 89 as amended. I would also point out with regard to the word
25 "country" that some little difference of opinion may arise as to the meaning of that word.
26 The sub-clause relates to "countries" and to "states." "States" we know are such parts of
27 Australia as are within the commonwealth. If any colony stands out it may be a little
28 doubtful whether it will be a "country." Would Queensland, if it stood out, be a "country"?
29 [start page 1065]
30
31 The Hon. R.E. O'CONNOR: A territory would be either a state of the
32 commonwealth, or another country!
33
34 The Hon. I.A. ISAACS: The word "country" might mean an independent state.
35
36 The Hon. E. BARTON: I will keep the matter in mind, though I fancy it is all right!
37 Sub-clause 1 agreed to.
38 END QUOTE
39
40 In the Melbourne session it was clarified that the Commonwealth ‘QUARANTINE’ related to
41 “man-kind” infectious diseases.
42
43 While Edelman J referred to the Official Record of the Debates of the Australasian Federal
44 Convention (Sydney), 22 September 1897 at 1062 at 292 His Honour Edelman refers to
45 “Subsequently, Mr Barton said” as to 1897 but somehow seems to blatantly ignored the
46 subsequent statement 7-2-1898 statement:
47
50 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
51 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
52 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
Page 33
1 END QUOTE
2
3 Therefore, the States since 1908 had lost their “concurrent” legislative powers to deal with
4 “man-kind” infectious diseases for which ‘QUARANTINE” kind of conduct was to be applied,
5 including MANDATES, compulsory vaccinations, etc.
6
7 It is beyond me that “GAGELER, KEANE, GORDON” failed to pick this up!
8
9 What those judges did was to pretend that the States have “man-kind” disease legislative,
10 executive and/or administrative powers and this could now be relied upon by the
11 State4s/Territories regardless that the High Court of Australia has no judicial powers to amend
12 the constitution as I view it purported to do by deceptive presentation.
13
14 The court in this case also referred some 33 times to COVID-19 and yet there is to my
15 knowledge no scientific evidence that SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) actually exist. It has
16 never been isolated/purified by the Koch postulate!
17
18 Also, I understand that Peter Doherty Institute at Melbourne appears to have claimed that they
19 discovered about 6 variants of Covid in January 2020 however, in subsequently legal
20 proceedings in Germany I understand that Peter Doherty Institute made known they never did
21 isolate and purify the alleged covid virus per Koch postulate. This even so they not only had
22 been provided with a prize of about $10,000 but also did end up with numerous government
23 contracts that they allegedly had established covid-19 virus.
24
25 https://www.globalresearch.ca/german-government-admits-there-was-no-pandemic/5853916
26 German Government Admits There Was No Pandemic
27 QUOTE
28 Introductory Note
29 What is significant is that the German Health authorities based on official data have now
30 been obliged under Freedom of Information to reveal the devastating nature and impacts
31 of the Covid lockdowns imposed on 190 countries, starting March 11, 2020.
32 Most of the independent studies including those conducted by Global Research have been
33 the object of censorship.
34 Of Significance, the official documents of Germany’s Ministry of Health are consistent
35 with the independent reports published in the course of more than 4 years pertaining to the
36 COVID-19 lockdowns, the mandatory wearing of the face mask, and the experimental
37 mRNA vaccines.
38 END QUOTE
39
40 https://cairnsnews.org/2023/04/29/maha-has-concrete-proof-for-court-evidence-sarscov2-does-
41 not-exist/
42 MAHA has concrete proof for court evidence SARSCOV2 does not exist
43 QUOTE MAHA has concrete proof for court evidence SARSCOV2 does not exist
44
Page 34
1 April 29, 2023Author: Editor, cairnsnews14 Comments

2 From Make Australians Healthy Again
3 THERE IS NO SARSCOV2 VIRUS And hence, there is no Covid19 Pandemic
4 It is all a huge fraud
5 All thanks to a wonderful German Engineer, Marvin Haberland, and a great American
6 researcher Christine Massey and an incredible German biologist, Dr Stefan Lanka and
7 many others.
8 Christine has proved through hundreds of FOI requests and responses, that the
9 SARSCOV2 virus has never been isolated anywhere in the World.
10 See https://bit.ly/3oK2RCg and https://bit.ly/41Efi0Y and the hundreds of FOI’s on
11 Christine’s website https://bit.ly/3AxNKyA
12 When Greg Hunt, the then Australian Federal Health Minister was questioned by Solihin
13 Millin he responded with a pathetic letter (see https://bit.ly/3JVOYGf) stating he was
14 unable to prove the explicit existence of the SARSCOV2 virus other than through citing
15 the results of a single pseudo-scientific experiment carried out by the Doherty Institute
16 associated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. (Editor: The Doherty Institute
17 had connections to US biolabs in Ukraine)
18 For the results of a scientific experiment to be validated a second precisely similar
19 experiment must be carried out without introducing the supposed causative agent, in the
20 case of the Doherty Institute, a human sample supposed to be infected with the
21 SARSCOV2 virus.
22 Marvin Haberland was astute enough to question this Doherty Institute pseudo-experiment,
23 and the Doherty Institute under FOI (Freedom of Information) confirmed that the
24 Doherty Institute never carried out a control experiment, thereby scientifically
25 invalidating their findings.
26 Further, a great German biologist Dr Stefan Lanka showed through running the missing
27 Doherty Institute control experiment that the results using a placebo (inert substance)
28 resulted in exactly the same experimental outcome. (see https://bit.ly/40GjThN)
29 Marvin Haberland was fined by the German Covid19 authorities and refused to pay the
30 fine, so he was taken to court.
31 Here is his complaint (translated into English) https://bit.ly/40BWjD7
32 https://5ytt0.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk/cl/f/z0ma9ykT3T1scEW_-
33 dbiVQhizkZz8W3zvdqSJ96EOV0phi8s1nDmaMLLjI01zqQIXdaT8Dni3LEAifl1WsK4bf
34 bt3GB3P7gqlcDUt-
35 yZrMrnQPfO0i1M1rpD_c_9hkGfqfJI_0KRtCAs4b_6L2PlM5xTbGBSXKm9xBboF6o44e
36 zD9AUMDcd42casXHLfVe6xz08MuIWxT4wGtjY8tQzXDDtysDUo3EZrHh2pxj9bPIsm
37 KnlRSWU_Scy0wUQddsOTadE8DPzYLVqCcUT91PuYWtGaf3gcLCdSNO24Kaatfec2E
38 ZQCSvcf7GyqLb0MSOtjVOUvsotmflj2K6DmDejbDjs
39 Marvin Haberlandhas won his case in Germany heard on the 26th April 2023.
40 This is now hard scientific and legal evidence for MAHA to raise in our up and coming
41 Australian Federal Court Class Action that the SARSCOV2 virus does not exist.
42 Hence Covid19 does not exist since it is meant to be caused by the non-existent
43 SARSCOV2 virus.
44 And hence Covid19 is a total fraud.
45 In addition there is a great deal of proof that the PCR test and associated false positives
46 that was used to create the false Covid19 cases, is completely false and cannot be used to
47 test for a disease.
48 A Portuguese court confirmed this – see https://bit.ly/41VMK2E
49 As did a request for retraction of the original Drostin paper recommending the PCR test to
50 test for SARSCOV2 and hence Covid19
51 (see https://bit.ly/3Lx5lNb and https://bit.ly/3NipFDo)
Page 35
1 Further huge amounts of evidence are available to MAHA confirming that the Covid19
2 Plandemic has been falsely constructed to enable the distribution of otherwise illegal, dual
3 purpose gain of function poisonous bio-warfare mRNA based nanotechnology gene
4 altering injections and other lethal and harmful nano substances by the United States of
5 America Department of Defence.
6 What has been called the SARSCOV2 virus is a chimeric (made by humans) in silico (only
7 exists in computers, created by human imagination) biological poison developed for bio-
8 warfare. (see https://bit.ly/3zHGuQ6)
9 We’ve won
10 In addition we have hard evidence that the Australian TGA has hidden death statistics in
11 order to support the false Australian Government Covid19 injection narrative.
12 (see https://bit.ly/3Lb4791 and https://bit.ly/3LubEBb)
13 With these simple facts which will be presented via the MAHA Class Action to the
14 Australian Federal Court we have proved the falsity of the entire Covid19 Plandemic
15 Australians rejoice
16 You are about to be compensated for this hugely destructive shocking lethal and injurious
17 fraud that the Australian Governments have inflicted on us all.
18 Share this:
19 Facebook
20 Twitter
21 Print
22 Email
23
24 Like this:
25 Loading...
26 Related
27 MAHA Federal Court Covid class action bolstered by German court upholding
28 SARSCOV2 virus does not existMay 9, 2023In "Courts"
29 Make Australia Healthy Again collecting evidence to sue state and federal
30 governments for Covid malfeasanceApril 12, 2023In "Agenda 2030"
31 Legitimacy of Covid plandemic challenged in High Court June 17June 3, 2021In
32 "coronavirus"
33 COVID CLASS ACTIONMAHASARCOVID2
34 END QUOTE MAHA has concrete proof for court evidence SARSCOV2 does not exist
35 And
36 QUOTE MAHA has concrete proof for court evidence SARSCOV2 does not exist
37
38 Reason for the objection:
39 1. the penalty notice is unlawful.
40 2. according to §1 IfSG applies:
41 (1) The purpose of the law is to prevent communicable diseases in humans, to detect
42 infections at an early stage and to prevent their further spread.
43 (2) The necessary cooperation and collaboration of federal, state and local authorities,
44 physicians, veterinarians, hospitals, scientific institutions and other stakeholders should be
45 organized and supported in accordance with the respective state of medical and
46 epidemiological science and technology.
47 3. the German Research Foundation (DFG) published guidelines to ensure good scientific practice as
48 early as 1998. When the Code comes into force on August 1, 2019, all universities and non-
49 university research institutions must implement the 19 guidelines and their explanatory notes in
50 a legally binding manner (see Proposal for Evidence 1a). According to the DFG, the general
51 principles of scientific work include:
52 ∙ Lege artis to work
Page 36
1 ∙ Document results
2 ∙ Consistently self-doubt all results
3 According to the DFG, the following also applies: Even in fields of work where intense
"
4 competition forces researchers to publish as quickly as possible, the quality of the work and
5 the publication must be the top priority. Results must be checked and replicated wherever
6 actually possible before they are submitted for publication." (see Request for Evidence 1b)
7 Guideline 11 of the Code (Methods and Standards) states, Many methods used in life science projects
"
8 have limitations. The strengths and weaknesses of a method should be considered in the choice of
9 method, documented, and balanced by appropriate controls. (see Evidence Request 1c)
"
10 The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) has also been committed to the DFG rules since May 2002.
11 According to the RKI, this serves scientific self-control (see Proposition of Evidence 1d).
12 The virologists did not act according to the state of the art of medical and epidemiological science
13 and technology, as required by §1 IfSG, because they did not control and document their methods
14 and results.
15 To prove my case, I submit the following evidentiary motions:
16 1. in order to prove that the state of the art in science and technology requires that its
17 results be consistently self-doubted, checked and documented, I request that the following
18 documents or sources be included:
19 (3) "Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice" of the German Research
20 Foundation (DFG), available at
21 http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/dfgimprofil/gremien/senat/klinischefors
22 chung/workshop1515/foliensaetzeveranstaltung/replizierbarkeitreplikati onfrankwissing.pdf.
23 (4) DFG document on replicability in clinical research, available at
24 http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/dfgimprofil/gremien/senat/klinischefors
25 chung/workshop1515/foliensaetzeveranstaltung/replizierbarkeitreplikati onfrankwissing.pdf.
26 (5) Guideline 11 "Methods and Standards in the Life Sciences" of the DFG, available at
27 https://wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de/kommentare/methoden-und-standards-in-den-
28 lebenswissenschaften/
29 (6) The RKI also acknowledges and commits to compliance with the DFG guidelines, which
30 can be read at https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Forsch/Grundlagen/grundlagennode.html
31 2. to prove that virologists do not control and document their methods, I request the
32 inclusion of the following document:
33 The attached document is a responded Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by
34 Australia's Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity at the University of Melbourne.
35 Researchers at the Doherty Institute began publishing the document in early 2020 with the
36 publication of
37 "Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from the first patient
38 diagnosed with COVID-19 in Australia" published one of the world's authoritative publications
39 on the claimed pathogen detection for the so-called "SARS-CoV-2" virus. The questioner asked
40 the authors of the study whether they had performed and documented the scientifically
41 prescribed control experiments for their methods. According to the authors, no control
42 experiments were documented throughout the publication and were not performed for the
43 whole genome sequencing. Thus, two central components of the scientific method are violated
44 (documentation and control).
45 3. to prove that none of the published studies on the so-called pathogen detection for "Sars-
46 CoV-2" includes performed and documented control experiments for the methods used -
47 including genome sequencing.
48 I request that the court obtain a factual opinion from a SARS-Cov-2 virologist on this
49 matter. The SARS-CoV-2 virologist should provide evidence, based on at least one
50 original scientific publication, that a viral structure designated as SARS-CoV-2 was
51 discovered through isolation and biochemical characterization of its components. The
Page 37
1 scientific publication must include the performance and documentation of all control
2 experiments.
3 mailto:marvin.haberland@berkeley.edu1
4 marvin.haberland@berkeley.edu
5 From: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au>
6 Sent: Tuesday, 22 February 2022 06:23
7 To: marvin.haberland@berkeley.edu
8 Cc: foi-officer
9 Subject: RE: [EXT] Request under FOI Act
10 Dear Marvin,
11 I have followed up with the Doherty Institute in response to your final question. The answer below was
12 provided:
13 At the time there was no established method for sequencing SARS CoV 2 In order to maximise the
- -
14 number of sequencing reads for nCoV2019 (named at the time) we elected to dedicate an entire flow cell
15 to the positive culture sample to maximise our recovery of the viral reads and not spend reads on
16 sequencing a negative sample.
17 I trust this is of assistance and wish you well. Kind regards,
18 Eugene
19 From: marvin.haberland@berkeley.edu <marvin.haberland@berkeley.edu> Sent: Tuesday, 8 February
20 2022 7:57 PM
21 To: <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au>
foi-officer
22 Subject: AW: [EXT] Request under FOI Act

23 External email: Please exercise caution
24 Dear Eugene,
25 Thank you very much.
26 Your answer fully satisfies my request.
27 Is there any specific reason why the authors of the study did not perform negative controls for all the
28 genome sequencing methodology?
29 Many thanks,
30 Marvin
31 From: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au> Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 04:01 To:
33 Cc: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au> Subject: RE: [EXT] Request under FOI Act.
34 Dear Marvin,
35 Apologies for the delay in response - I have made some preliminary enquiries and write to advise that the
36 Doherty Institute can provide the following answers to your questions regarding the "Isolation and rapid
37 sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS- CoV- 2) from the first patient diagnosed with COVID- 19
38 in Australia" publication.
39
40 (7) Can you confirm that the negative control culture was grown in the same conditions
41 (37°C, 5% CO2) and maintenance media (consisting of 10mL EMEM, 7% FBS, 2mM L L- -
42 glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1500mg/L sodium bicarbonate, 15 mM HEPES and

,
43 0.4mg/ml geneticin) to 95% confluency in 25cm2 flasks, and that, for the negative control,
44 maintenance media was removed and 10 mL viral culture media (EMEM as above but FBS
45 reduced to 2%) was added?
46 As background, Doherty researchers define a control to be a component of an experiment intended to
47 eliminate alternative explanations for experimental results, due to 'confounding variables'. It does this by
48 as closely as is feasible replicating all components of the experiment other than the variable being
49 measured. In this case, it means our negative controls have been treated in the same media conditions
50 and changes as our positives.
51 2. Could you please provide me with the exact documentation of the negative
52 control experiment. There is no specific documentation for this experiment. Assuming
53 your question relates to the methodology used to create this control, these are not
54 documented or included in publications. As mentioned above, they are presumed to follow
55 as much as it is feasible the original experiment, replicating all components of the
56 experiment other than the variable being measured.
Page 38
1 3. Regarding genome sequencing from the infected cell culture, did you perform
2 control experiments to exclude that also other virus genomes could have been assembled
3 de novo or via alignment using other reference genomes? We did not look for other viral
4 genomes. Our assembly was performed against the released Wuhan 1 reference sequence as
- -1
5 we were looking for SARS CoV 2.

- -
6 4. Did you perform control experiments to exclude that the target virus genome
7 could have been assembled de novo or via alignment from the negative control culture?
8 Sequencing and denovo assembly was only performed on positive, infected material.
9 5. If the answer for 3. and 4. is yes, could you please provide to me the documented
10 negative control procedure for the genome sequencing?
11 N/A - see responses to 3 and 4.
12 I trust these responses satisfy your queries. Kind regards,
13 Eugene
14 Eugene Toh (he/him) | Information Regulation Officer
15 Information Regulation | Information Governance Services | Legal and Risk The University of
16 Melbourne
17 T: +61 3 834 427 04 / MS Teams (preferred) E: eugene.toh@unimelb.edu.au
18 I acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land on which I work, and pay my respects to the
19 Elders, past and present.
20
21 This email and any attachments may contain personal information or information that is
22 otherwise confidential or the subject of copyright. Any use, disclosure or copying of any part of
23 it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or any attachments are free from
24 viruses or defects. Please check any attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If
25 this email is received in error, please delete it and notify us by return email.
26 From: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au> Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2022 9:40 AM
28 3
29 Cc: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au> Subject: RE: [EXT] Request under FOI Act.
30 Dear Marvin,
31 Thanks for your email and apologies for the delay - I've followed up w/ relevant authors of the
32 publication and am hoping to have an answer to your questions soon. I'll keep you updated.
33 Regards,
34 Eugene
35 From: marvin.haberland@berkeley.edu <marvin.haberland@berkeley.edu> Sent: Tuesday, 1
36 February 2022 4:55 AM
37 To: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au>
38 Subject: AW: [EXT] Request under FOI Act
40 Dear Sir or Madam,
41 This is a kind reminder regarding my request.
42 Marvin Haberland
43 From: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au> Sent: Thursday, 23 December 2021 01:45 To:
45 Cc: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au> Subject: FW: [EXT] Request under FOI Act.
46 Dear Marvin,
47 We have received preliminary advice from the Doherty Institute that your questions can be
48 answered directly, outside of the formal FOI process. However, as the University is entering its
49 shutdown period (24th Dec - 3rd Jan), we will not have a response until midlate January. If you're
50 happy to proceed on this basis, we will continue liaising with the Doherty and get answers to
51 your questions as soon as possible.
52 Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Kind regards,
Page 39
1 Eugene
2 Eugene Toh (he/him) | Information Regulation Officer
3 Information Regulation | Information Governance Services | Legal and Risk The University of Melbourne
4 T: +61 3 834 427 04 / MS Teams (preferred) E: eugene.toh@unimelb.edu.au
5 I acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land on which I work, and pay my respects to the Elders, past and
6 present.
7
8 4
9 This email and any attachments may contain personal information or information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of copyright. Any use, disclosure or
10 copying of any part of it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any
11 attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this email is received in error, please delete it and notify us by return email.
12 From: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au> Sent: Tuesday, 14 December 2021 9:01 AM
14 Cc: foi-officer <foi-officer@unimelb.edu.au> Subject: FW: [EXT] Request under FOI Act.
15 Dear Marvin,
16 I write to acknowledge receipt of your below email to The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection
17 and Immunity. We will make preliminary enquiries and come back to you with further advice in
18 due course.
19 Kind regards,
20 Susan Maye she/her/hers |Manager, Information Regulation
( )
21 Information Governance Services I Legal and Risk I Chief Operating Officer Portfolio The University of
22 Melbourne, Parkville Campus, Victoria, Australia
23 E: susan.maye@unimelb.edu.au T: +61 3 903 54268 / MS Teams Meet: Zoom / Teams
24 Please note that the University is closed for business from 25 December to 3 January, reopening on Tuesday, 4
25 January 2022.
26 To manage end of year workload and resourcing, we ask that you engage with us as early as possible. The team will
27 be managing urgent matters on a priority basis during December and January as we will have reduced staff
28 available during this period.
29 Many University staff remain working remotely. My usual hours of work are Monday to Thursday 9:30am to
30 5:30pm and every second Friday.
31 From: marvin.haberland@mailbox.org <marvin.haberland@mailbox.org> Sent: Friday, 10
32 December 2021 2:48 AM
33 To: Doherty Reception <doherty-reception@unimelb.edu.au> Subject: [EXT] Request under
34 FOI Act.
36 Dear Sir or Madam,
37 Under the FOI Act, I would like to request the following information and/or documentation
38 regarding the publication "Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-
39 CoV- 2) from the first patient diagnosed with COVID- 19 in Australia" published by several
40 authors of your house.
41 1. can you confirm that the negative control culture was grown in the same conditions
42 (37°C, 5% CO2) and maintenance media (consisting of 10mL EMEM, 7% FBS, 2mM L-
43 Lglutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1500mg/L sodium bicarbonate, 15 mM HEPES and

,
44 0.4mg/ml geneticin) to 95% confluency in 25cm2 flasks, and that, for the negative control,
45 maintenance media was removed and 10 mL viral culture media (EMEM as above but FBS
46 reduced to 2%) was added?
47
48 (8) Could you please provide me with the exact documentation of the negative control
49 experiment.
50 (9) Regarding genome sequencing from the infected cell culture, did you perform control
51 experiments to exclude that also other virus genomes could have been assembled de novo or
52 via alignment using other reference genomes?
53 (10) Did you perform control experiments to exclude that the target virus genome could have
54 been assembled de novo or via alignment from the negative control culture?
55 (11) If the answer for 3. and 4. is yes, could you please provide to me the documented
56 negative control procedure for the genome sequencing?

Page 40
1 Please send your answer to marvin.haberland@berkeley.edu. Please confirm that you received
2 this FOIA request.
3 Many thanks and kind regards
4 Marvin Haberland
5 END QUOTE MAHA has concrete proof for court evidence SARSCOV2 does not exist
6
7 What shows is that in my view Peter Doherty Institute so to say hoodwinked others in that it
8 had isolated and purified by the Koch postulate, etc, in January 2020 and ended up being some
9 advisor to the Victorian Government, etc, when it appears to me the records indicates it never did
10 isolate and purified by the Koch postulate this alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus. So here we had
11 ACMA and others interfering with Australians “political liberty” and “religious liberty”, etc,
12 all about misinformation/disinformation while in fact they were in my view engaged in a
13 protection racket to protect the very TRAITORS/TERRORIST who were actually causing the
14 harm! Let us consult the Framers of the Constitution as to what they considered constitutes
15 “TERRORISM”
16
17 In a recent article it was alleged that the police were more to support the political issues of the
18 government and this appears to me to be very much what is going on. With the murder of Carl
19 Williams in my view the Victorian Police and the prison staff were involved but to my
20 knowledge this was never properly investigated.
21 The same with what appeared to be criminal conduct by Mr Daniel Andrews regarding the
22 pushbike incident, where I understood he and his wife made false/misleading statements.
23 The same with the alleged incident that somehow the timber floor had hit him on the shoulder.
24
25
26 QUOTE Wednesday, 15 May 2024 at 11:17:27 am AEST, IBAC Enquiry Email info@ibac.vic.gov.au
27 On Wednesday, 15 May 2024 at 11:17:27 am AEST, IBAC Enquiry Email <info@ibac.vic.gov.au> wrote:
28
29
30 OFFICIAL
31
32 Dear Gerrit
33
34 Your enquiry
35
36 Thank you for your email, received by IBAC on 13 May 2024.
37
38 Based on the information provided, IBAC is unclear on how to best direct your enquiry. Please clearly explain if
39 you wish to lodge a complaint about Police misconduct and if so what the Police misconduct is in relation to your
40 sons the stolen items.
41
42 Police misconduct is inappropriate or illegal conduct in connection with their official duties. Complaints to IBAC
43 about Victoria Police misconduct can include things such as:
44 • human rights breaches or use of excessive force
45 • discrimination, bullying, or harassment
46 • failure to take appropriate action or provide adequate care

47
48
49 If you wish to make a complaint, you may do so by completing and returning the attached complaint form.
50 Alternatively, you can submit a complaint online via our website at: Make a complaint about corruption or police
51 misconduct | IBAC.
52

Page 41
1 For further information on what is considered corruption, please see: www.ibac.vic.gov.au/what-is-

2 corruption. For police misconduct, see: https://www.ibac.vic.gov.au/what-police-misconduct.
3
4 What to include in your complaint:
5
6 IBAC requires information about specific incidents, actions or conversations that you believe indicate that members
7 of Victoria Police, Victorian public officers or Victorian public bodies are involved in corruption or serious
8 misconduct. This includes the names of any public officer involved, as well as the locations and dates of any
9 relevant events.
10
11 Once we have received the updated information, we can assess the complaint and make a decision about the next
12 steps.
13
14 If you need support
15
16 Sometimes making a complaint can be very stressful or difficult for a person. If you are impacted by this complaint,
17 we encourage you to contact your healthcare provider.
18
19 Alternatively, you may wish to access one of the support services listed on our
20 website: https://www.ibac.vic.gov.au/reporting-corruption/what-happens-to-your-complaint/mental-health-support.
21
22 For more information
23
24 If you have any questions about this process, please call us on 1300 735 135. Further information on our complaints
25 process and the support available to you can be found at: www.ibac.vic.gov.au/complaintoutcomes
26
27
28 Yours sincerely,
29
30 Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission
31 Level 1, 459 Collins St, Melbourne, Victoria 3000
32 GPO Box 24234, Melbourne Victoria 3000
33 DX 210187 www.ibac.vic.gov.au
34 Please consider the environment before printing this email.
35 IBAC acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the lands on which we work and pay respects to Elders past, present and emerging. We
36 recognise and celebrate the diversity of Aboriginal peoples and their ongoing cultures and connections to the lands and waters of Victoria.
37
38
IBAC Enquiry Email
E: info@ibac.vic.gov.au
Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission

www.ibac.vic.gov.au
Follow on Twitter, LinkedIn or subscribe to IBAC Insights e-news.
IBAC acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the lands on which we work and pay respects to Elders past, present and emerging. We
recognise and celebrate the diversity of Aboriginal peoples and their ongoing cultures and connections to the lands and waters of Victoria.
39
40 From: Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. <inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au>
41 Sent: Monday, May 13, 2024 6:42 PM
42 To: IBAC Enquiry Email <info@ibac.vic.gov.au>
43 Cc: Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. <inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au>; RMHHospitalInTheHome@mh.org.au
44 Subject: CM: See attachment 20240513-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to IBAC Re The Royal Melbourne
45 Hospital (Re Mark Schorel MRN 1107850
46
47 Independent Broad-based Anti-Corruption Commission (IBAC) Victoria 13-5-2024
48 https://www.ibac.vic.gov.au/ info@ibac.vic.gov.au
49
50 Cc: Prof Shelley Dolan Chief Executive
51 The Royal Melbourne Hospital
52 RMHHospitalInTheHome@mh.org.au
Page 42
1
2 COMPLAINT
3 Re: The Royal Melbourne Hospital (Re Mark Schorel MRN 1107850)
4
5 Sir/Madam,
6 See attachment
7
8 20240513-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to IBAC Re The Royal Melbourne Hospital
9 (Re Mark Schorel MRN 1107850
10
11 Constitutionalist & Consultant
12
14 Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B., GUARDIAN
15 (OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN)
16 107 Graham Road, Viewbank, 3084, Victoria, Australia
17 Ph (International) 61394577209
18 .
19 Email; inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
20
21 The content of this email and any attachments are provided WITHOUT PREJUDICE, unless
22 specifically otherwise stated.
23
24 If you find any typing/grammatical errors then I know you read it, all you now need to do is to
25 consider the content appropriately!
26
27 A FOOL IS A PERSON WHO DOESN'T ASK THE QUESTION BECAUSE OF BEING
28 CONCERNED TO BE LABELLED A FOOL.
29 END QUOTE Wednesday, 15 May 2024 at 11:17:27 am AEST, IBAC Enquiry Email info@ibac.vic.gov.au
30
31 There is a lot more about it all but it should be very clear that IBAC failure to do a proper
32 investigation upon my April 2020 complaint may have been why so many Victorians became
33 victims and even died as result of the UNCONSTITUTIONAL jabs. You may not desire to read
34 the extensive writings but that is no excuse as had you in the first place appropriately considered
35 matters then likely thousands upon thousands of Victorians and other may never have ended up
36 being victims of the “covid scam”. Let us not ignore either the harm inflicted upon numerous
37 businesses! And, when you due to your own incompetence to appropriately investigate matters
38 ends up with more paperwork then well you can only blame yourself!
39
40 Where is the financial assistance for mark having to pay out large sums of monies while unable
41 to work due to his illness? Holden unlikely is coming to the table, and well it may just in time
42 discover that this can become a very expensive abuse of powers, and so for others who acted in a
43 similar manner.
44
45 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
46
47 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
48 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

50 (Our name is our motto!)

20240516-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To IBAC Re Enquiry Case - 20242400 - The Royal Melbourne Hospital (Re Mark Schorel MRN 1107850

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20240516-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To IBAC Re Enquiry Case - 20242400 - The Royal Melbourne Hospital (Re Mark Schorel MRN 1107850

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

16-5-2024 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

16-5-2024 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

16-5-2024 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

16-5-2024 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is

16-5-2024 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 This is succinctly stated as follows:

16-5-2024 Page 16 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

16-5-2024 Page 18 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

16-5-2024 Page 24 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

44 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

16-5-2024 Page 25 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 1974/12/10 – Secretary of State Henry Kissenger’s national

6 1975/11/26 – President Gerald Ford endorsed the Kissinger Report’s

1 I apprehend the Commonwealth must have complete power to grant or

16-5-2024 Page 30 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

16-5-2024 Page 31 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 April 29, 2023Author: Editor, cairnsnews14 Comments

22 Subject: AW: [EXT] Request under FOI Act

42 glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1500mg/L sodium bicarbonate, 15 mM HEPES and

5 we were looking for SARS CoV 2.

43 Lglutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1500mg/L sodium bicarbonate, 15 mM HEPES and

16-5-2024 Page 39 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

45 • discrimination, bullying, or harassment

46 • failure to take appropriate action or provide adequate care

16-5-2024 Page 40 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 For further information on what is considered corruption, please see: www.ibac.vic.gov.au/what-is-

Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission

49 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

You might also like