Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Planning
1 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Content
2 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Narrowband Allocation
Mobile Access
3 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Narrowbands (I)
• LTE-M UE transmit and receive within 6 PRB belonging to a ‘Narrowband’
• A Narrowband is defined as 6 adjacent PRB in the frequency domain
• The number of Narrowbands within each channel bandwidth is shown below
• Narrowbands are centered around the middle of the channel bandwidth
• If the channel bandwidth has an odd number of PRB then the central PRB does not
belong to a Narrowband
4 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Narrowbands (II)
• The Narrowbands belonging to the 3, 5 and 10 MHz channel bandwidths are shown
below:
3 MHz channel
Narrowband 0 Narrowband 1
5 MHz channel
Narrowband 0 Narrowband 1 Narrowband 2 Narrowband 3
10 MHz channel
5 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Downlink Narrowband (I)
• Within the timescales of FL17A, the position of
the downlink Narrowband is fixed
• LTE3128 allocates Narrowband 7 for the 10 MHz
channel bandwidth
• PRB 43 to 48
• LTE3582 allocates Narrowband 0 for the 5 MHz
channel bandwidth
• PRB 0 to 5
6 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Downlink Narrowband (II)
7 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Uplink Narrowband
8 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
PCI Planning
Mobile Access
9 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
PCI Planning
• PCI planning is not necessary for LTE-M
• LTE-M shares the same PCI as the host cell
10 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Cell Range Planning
Mobile Access
11 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Cell Range Planning
12 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Cell Range – Timing Advance
13 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Cell Range – PRACH Preamble Format
• The PRACH Preamble Format is configured using the PRACH Configuration Index
• Within the timescale of FL17A, LTE-M shares the same PRACH Configuration Index as the
legacy LTE host cell
14 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Cell Range – PRACH Root Sequence Cyclic Shift
• Within the timescale of FL17A, LTE-M shares the same PRACH Root Sequence Cyclic Shift
as the legacy LTE host cell
• LTE-M does not place any restrictions upon the configuration of prachConfIndex
15 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Cell Range Planning - Summary
• If the existing legacy LTE Cell Range is sufficient for LTE-M, then no additional planning is
required for LTE-M
• If there is a requirement to increase the Cell Range for LTE-M then it must be increased for
both LTE-M and legacy LTE
• potential change of PRACH Format
• change of PRACH Root Sequence Cyclic Shift
• re-planning of PRACH Root Sequences
16 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
MPRACH Planning
Mobile Access
17 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
MPRACH Planning
• PRACH Planning for legacy LTE involves:
• selection of PRACH Preamble Format
Impact of LTE-M should at
• selection of PRACH Configuration Index
least be considered
• selection of PRACH Root Sequence Cyclic Shift
• Root Sequence allocation
Modified by LTE-M
• division of 64 preamble sequences into groups
• specification of PRACH frequency offset
• These tasks are common to both LTE-M and legacy LTE when LTE-M is enabled
18 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Selection of PRACH Preamble Format
• It should be possible to keep the same PRACH Preamble Format when enabling LTE-M
• existing cell range should correspond to the existing site density
• any change to the PRACH Preamble Format will impact both LTE-M and legacy LTE
• The PRACH Preamble Format should be checked to gain an understanding of the maximum cell
range
19 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Selection of PRACH Root Sequence Cyclic Shift
• It should be possible to keep the same PRACH Root Sequence Cyclic Shift when enabling
LTE-M
• existing cell range should correspond to the existing site density
• any change to the PRACH Root Sequence Cyclic Shift will impact both LTE-M and
legacy LTE
• The PRACH Root Sequence Cyclic Shift should be checked to gain an understanding of the
maximum cell range
20 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Division of 64 Preambles into Groups
• When enabling LTE-M, it is necessary to allocate a subset of
preambles to ‘Group C’
• reduces the preambles available to legacy LTE
• The number of preambles belonging to Group C is configured
using raPreGrCSizeCatM
• default of 15 preambles
• It is likely that the legacy values for raPreGrASize and
raNondedPreamb will need to be reconfigured when enabling
LTE-M
raPreGrASize
raNondedPreamb raPreGrCSizeCatM
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Preamble
Transmission Period of 8 PRACH opportunities
22 04/04/2024 Repetition of Preamble (prachStartSFCatM)
© Nokia 2017
Transmission
Period between MPRACH Opportunities (II)
• The period between the start of LTE-M PRACH opportunities must allow for repetitions
• For example, if 8 repetitions are used for each MPRACH preamble transmission then the period
should be at least 8 PRACH opportunities
23 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
MPUCCH Allocation
Mobile Access
24 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
MPUCCH Allocation
• Used to transfer Scheduling Requests and HARQ Acknowledgements
• no CSI reporting on the MPUCCH
• Within the timescales of FL17A, a 2 PRB are allocated to the MPUCCH
• total PUCCH allocation must be increased by 2
• The total PUCCH allocation must be <= 14 PRB when using the 10 MHz channel to
avoid colliding with Narrowband 6
SR ACK/NACK SR ACK/NACK
25 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Link Budget
Mobile Access
26 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Link Budget (I)
• Link budget principles for LTE-M are the same as for other technologies
• A key point is that the Noise Floor needs to be scaled according to the bandwidth of
the physical channel, i.e. based upon kTB
• k = Boltzmann’s constant = 1.38 ×10 -23 Downlink Scheduler allocates 6 PRB
• T = temperature = 290 K Uplink Scheduler allocates 2 or 6 PRB
• B = Bandwidth
27 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Link Budget (II)
• Similar to other link budgets, SINR requirements are an important input
• generated from link level simulations
• service/channel specific
• LTE-M link budget can include a ‘Handoff Gain’ although handover is not
supported in FL17A
• quantifies the cell edge benefit of being able to cell reselect onto the best cell
as fading conditions change the best server over time
28 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Link Budget (III)
• Important to differentiate between ‘Path Loss’ and ‘Coupling Loss’
• These terms are often mixed in documentation
• Path Loss is the air-interface propagation loss
• Coupling Loss is the total link loss between antenna connectors
29 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Link Budget (IV)
Mobile Access
32 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Power Boosting
• Within the timescales of FL17A, downlink power boosting is not supported for LTE-M
Mobile Access
34 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
BTS Identity
• The LNBTS object is shared between legacy LTE and LTE-M, i.e. there is a common BTS
Identity and separate planning is not required
Cell Identity
• The LNCEL object is shared between legacy LTE and LTE-M, i.e. there is a common Local
Cell Resource Identity and separate planning is not required
• Cell Identities are planned using the Local Cell Resource Identity (lcrId)
• combined with the BTS Identity to generate eutraCelId
eutraCelId
lnBtsId lcrId
35 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Tracking Area Planning
Mobile Access
36 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Tracking Area Planning
• Tracking Area Codes (TAC) are shared between legacy LTE and LTE-M, i.e. separate
planning is not required
• The eNode B separates the legacy LTE and LTE-M paging records using the ‘Extended UE
Identity Index Value’
• legacy LTE pages are not broadcast over LTE-M, and vice versa
37 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Neighbours
Mobile Access
38 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Neighbour Planning
• Within the timescales of FL17A, LTE-M only supports Idle Mode mobility
• Neighbour definitions are not mandatory
• Neighbour Planning is not necessary
• Note that SIB4-BR (intra-frequency) allows the inclusion of specific neighbours for blacklisting
and the application of measurement power offsets
• can be optionally defined
Mobile Access
40 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Hardware Dimensioning
• The following hardware is required for LTE-M:
• FSMF, or
• Airscale
• The activation of LTE-M does not require additional LNCEL objects at the eNode B, i.e.
both legacy LTE and LTE-M share the same cells
• This means that hardware dimensioning is not impacted when evaluating the requirement for
Cell Sets
41 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Impact upon Legacy LTE
Mobile Access
42 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
Impact upon Legacy LTE
• LTE-M allows dynamic sharing of Resource Blocks within the allocated Narrowband
between LTE-M and legacy LTE
• impact of LTE-M depends upon LTE-M activity factor (load)
• Also a dependence upon PBCH repetition and System Information broadcast rate
• The attached Excel allows impact to be quantified:
Microsoft Excel
Worksheet
43 04/04/2024
© Nokia 2017
44 04/04/2024 © Nokia 2014
Customer Confidential