Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ﻣﻠﺧﺹ
ﺗﻁﺭﺡ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ "ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ" ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﺃﻟﻔﻬﺎ ﺷﻣﺱ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﺃﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﺳﻠﯾﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺭﻭﻣﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺭﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ ) 940ﻫ ـ(،
ﻗﺿﯾﺔ ﻻﻗﺕ ﺍﻫﺗﻣﺎﻣﺎﹰ ﻛﺑﯾﺭﺍﹰ ﻟﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﯾﻥ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﻣﺣﻭﺭﺍﹰ ﻣﻬﻣﺎﹰ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺅﻟﻔﺎﺗﻬﻡ ،ﻓﻣﻭﺿﻭﻋﻬﺎ ﻟﯾﺱ ﺟﺩﯾﺩﺍﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺑﯾﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻛﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻣﺛل ﺩﻋﻭﺓ ﻟﻠﺧﺭﻭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺩﺭﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺳﻛﺎﻛﻲ )626ﻫ ـ( ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻫﯾﻣﻧﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﻲ ﺑﻧﺯﻋﺗﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺳﻔﯾﺔ ﻭﺗﻔﺭﯾﻌﺎﺗﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻁﻘﯾﺔ ،ﺣﯾﺙ ﻗﺩﻡ ﻓﯾﻬﺎ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﯾﻥ ﺟﺩﯾﺩﯾﻥ ﻟﻠﻣﺟﺎﺯ؛ ﯾﺯﻋﻡ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺗﻔﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻷﻭل ﻭﺍﺧﺗﺭﻉ ﺍﻵﺧﺭ.
ﻭﻗﺩ ﺍﻧﻘﺳﻡ ﻋﻣﻠﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻗﺳﻣﯾﻥ :ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﺗﺿﻣﻧﺕ ﺗﺭﺟﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻣﺅﻟﻑ ﺍﺷﺗﻣﻠﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﯾﺭﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻛﺎﻧﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﯾﺔ،
ﻭﻣﺅﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﻼﻏﯾﺔ ﻣﻭﺟﺯﺓ ﻟﻣﺿﻣﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ،ﺛﻡ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻓﻕ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻓﺻﻠﺕ ﺧﻁﻭﺍﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻘﺩﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﯾﺭ؟ ﻗﺎل :ﻫﻭ ﻋﺎﻟﻡ ﻣﺩﺭﺱ ،ﯾﻘﺎل ﻟﻪ :ﺍﻟﻣﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﻘﺩﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ
ﻟﻁﻔﻲ ،ﻗﻠﺕ :ﻛﻡ ﻭﻅﯾﻔﺗﻪ؟ ﻗﺎل :ﺛﻼﺛﻭﻥ ﺩﺭﻫﻣﺎ ،ﻗﻠﺕ :ﻭﻛﯾﻑ
ﯾﺗﺻﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﯾﺭ ﻭﻣﻧﺻﺑﻪ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺩﺍﺭ؟ ﻓﻘﺎل ﺭﻓﯾﻘﻲ: )(1
ﺃ( :ﺗﺭﺟﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻟﻑ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﻣﻌﻅﻣﻭﻥ ﻟﻌﻠﻣﻬﻡ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻟﻭ ﺗﺄﺧﹼﺭ ﻟﻡ ﯾﺭﺽ ﺑﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻷﻣﯾﺭ ﻫﻭ ﺷﻣﺱ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﺃﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﺳﻠﯾﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺭﻭﻣﻲ،
ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﯾﺭ ،ﻗﺎل :ﻓﺗﻔﻛﺭﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻔﺳﻲ ﻓﻭﺟﺩﺕ ﺃﻧﻲ ﻻ ﺃﺑﻠﻎ ﺭﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺭﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ )940ﻫ( ،ﻣﻥ ﻋﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻙ
ﺍﻷﻣﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻲ ﻟﻭ ﺍﺷﺗﻐﻠﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻡ ﯾﻣﻛﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﺭﺑﯾﻥ) ،(2ﻧﺷﺄ ﻓﻲ ﺑﯾﺕ ﻋﻠﻡ ﻭﻓﺿل ﻭﻣﻛﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﯾﺔ ،ﻓﻘﺩ
ﺃﺑﻠﻎ ﺭﺗﺑﺔ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻡ ،ﻓﻧﻭﯾﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺷﺗﻐل ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻡ ﺍﻟﺷﺭﯾﻑ").(6 ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺩﻩ ﻷﺑﯾﻪ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻣﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺛﻣﺎﻧﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻬﺩ ﺍﻟﺳﻠﻁﺎﻥ
ﻭﻣﻧﺫ ﺗﻠﻙ ﺍﻟﺣﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﺍﺟﺗﻬﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﺻﯾل ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﯾﺩ ﻛﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺗﺢ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﺎﺗﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﺳﻁﻧﻁﯾﻧﯾﺔ) ،(3ﻋﯾﻥ ﻣﺩﺭﺳﺎ ﻟﻧﺟﻠﻲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﺎﺀ ،ﯾﻘﻭل ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻁﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺳﻧﯾﺔ" :ﺩﺃﺏ ﻭﺣﺻل ﻭﺻﺭﻑ
ﺍﻟﺳﻠﻁﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺗﺢ "ﺑﺎﯾﺯﯾﺩ ﺧﺎﻥ" ،ﻭﻟﻬﺫﺍ ﺣﺻل ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻘﺏ "ﺑﺎﺷﺎ"،
ﺳﺎﺋﺭ ﺃﻭﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﺻﯾل ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻡ ﻭﻣﺫﻛﺭﺍﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻓﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﺗﻔﺎﺩﺗﻪ، ﻭﻣﻥ ﺗﻼﻣﯾﺫﻩ") (4ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ" ﻭ"ﺍﻟﺷﺭﯾﻑ ﺍﻟﺟﺭﺟﺎﻧﻲ").(5
ﺣﺗﻰ ﻓﺎﻕ ﺍﻷﻗﺭﺍﻥ ،ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﺇﻧﺳﺎﻥ ﻋﯾﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﯾﺎﻥ").(7 ﺍﺧﺗﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﻟﺗﺣﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺳﻛﺭﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻬﺩ ﺍﻟﺳﻠﻁﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﯾﺯﯾﺩ ﺧﺎﻥ
ﻭﻗﺩ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺷﯾﺧﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﻟﻰ ﻟﻁﻔﻲ ﻓﻘﺭﺃ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ،ﺛﻡ ﻗﺭﺃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻭﻟﻛﻧﻪ ﻟﻡ ﯾﻣﺽ ﻭﻗﺗﹰﺎ ﻁﻭﯾﻼﹰ ﻓﻲ ﻋﺳﻛﺭﯾﺗﻪ ﺣﺗﻰ ﺣﺩﺛﺕ
ﻏﯾﺭﻩ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺣﺗﻰ ﺃﺟﺎﺩ ﻭﺑﺭﻉ ﻓﻲ ﺳﺎﺋﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﻗﯾل ﻓﯾﻪ: ﻟﻪ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﻏﯾﺭﺕ ﻣﺟﺭﻯ ﺣﯾﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻓﺎﻧﺗﻘل ﺑﻌﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺟﯾﺵ ﺇﻟﻰ
"ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻋﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﻭﻗﻠﹼﻣﺎ ﯾﻭﺟﺩ ﻓﻥ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻟﻪ ﻓﯾﻪ ﻣﺻﻧﻑ ﺃﻭ ﻁﻠﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻡ ،ﻓﻘﺩ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﺳﺎﻥ "ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل" ﻧﻔﺳﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ" :ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻊ
ﻣﺻﻧﻔﺎﺕ") ،(8ﻭﻣﻥ ﺷﯾﻭﺧﻪ ﺍﻟﺫﯾﻥ ﻗﺭﺃ ﻋﻠﯾﻬﻡ):(9 ﺍﻟﺳﻠﻁﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﯾﺯﯾﺩ ﺧﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻔﺭ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﯾﺭﻩ ﺣﯾﻧﺋﺫٍ ﺇﺑﺭﺍﻫﯾﻡ
ﻟﻁﻑ ﺍﻟﻠ ـﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﻭﻗﺎﺗﻲ ،ﺍﻟﺷﻬﯾﺭ ﺑ ـ ﻣﻼ ﻟﻁﻔﻲ )ﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺎ ﺑﻥ ﺧﻠﯾل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺃﻣﯾﺭ ﻟﯾﺱ ﻓﻲ
900ﻫ ـ().(10 ﺍﻷﻣﺭﺍﺀ ﺃﻋﻅﻡ ﻣﻧﻪ ،ﯾﻘﺎل ﻟﻪ :ﺃﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻙ ﺑﻥ ﺃﺭﻧﻭﺱ .ﻗﺎل :ﻓﻛﻧﺕ
ﻣﺻﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻣﺻﻁﻔﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺳﻁﻼﻧﻰ )ﺕ901 .ﻫ ـ().(11 ﻭﺍﻗﻔﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺩﻣﻲ ﻗﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﯾﺭ ،ﻭﻋﻧﺩﻩ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ
ﻣﺣﯾﻲ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﺇﺑﺭﺍﻫﯾﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺷﻬﯾﺭ ﺑﺎﺑﻥ ﺍﻟﺧﻁﯾﺏ ،ﺃﻭ ﺟﺎﻟﺳﺎ ،ﺇﺫ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺭﺟل ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺭﺙﹼ ﺍﻟﻬﯾﺋﺔ ،ﺩﻧﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﺑﺎﺱ،
ﺑﺧﻁﯾﺏ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ )ﺕ901 .ﻫ ـ().(12 ﻓﺟﻠﺱ ﻓﻭﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ ﻭﻟﻡ ﯾﻣﻧﻌﻪ ﺃﺣﺩ ﻣﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ،ﻓﺗﺣﯾﺭﺕ
ﺳﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﯾﻭﺳﻑ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺭﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﺑﻥ ﺍﻟﹾﻣﻌﺭﱢﻑ).(13
ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺭ ،ﻭﻗﻠﺕ ﻟﺑﻌﺽ ﺭﻓﻘﺎﺋﻲ :ﻣﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﺗﺻﺩﺭ
ﻭﻟﻣﻛﺎﻧﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﯾﺔ ﻭﺗﻔﻭﻗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻗﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺃﺗﺧﺫ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺩﺭﯾﺱ
ﺻﻧﻌﺔ ﻭﻣﻬﻧﺔ ،ﻓﺄﻋﻁﻲ ﺗﺩﺭﯾﺱ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺣﺩﯾﺙ ﺑﻣﺩﯾﻧﺔ ﺃﺩﺭﻧﺔ، * ﻣﺷﺭﻑ ﺗﺭﺑﻭﻱ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﺑﯾﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻌﻠﯾﻡ ،ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ .ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ ﺍﺳﺗﻼﻡ
ﻭﻋﯾﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻛل ﯾﻭﻡ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﻭﻥ ﺩﺭﻫﻣﺎ) ،(14ﺛﻡ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﺩﺭﯾﺱ ﺍﻟﺑﺣﺙ ،2009/4/12ﻭﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ ﻗﺑﻭﻟﻪ .2010/8/11
2011ﻋﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ /ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻧﻴﺔ .ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﻘﻮﻕ ﳏﻔﻮﻇﺔ. - 491 -
ﺟﺑﺭ ﺇﺑﺭﺍﻫﯾﻡ ﺑﺭﻱ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ...
ﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺻﺭ ،ﻭﻓﺧﺭ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﺩﻫﺭ ،ﻭﻟﻡ ﯾﺧﻠﻑ ﺃﺣﺩ ﻣﻧﻬﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺩﻩ ﺑﻣﺩﺭﺳﺔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻙ ﺑﻣﺩﯾﻧﺔ ﺃﺩﺭﻧﺔ ،ﺛﻡ ﻋﯾﻥ ﺑﻣﺩﺭﺳﺔ ﺃﺳﻛﻭﺏ ،ﺛﻡ
ﻣﺛﻠﻪ").(21 ﺍﻧﺗﻘل ﻟﻠﻣﺩﺭﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺣﻠﺑﯾﺔ ،ﺛﻡ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻣﺩﺭﺳﺎ ﺑﻣﺩﺭﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺳﻠﻁﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﯾﺯﯾﺩ ﺧﺎﻥ ﺑﺄﺩﺭﻧﺔ).(15
ﻣﺅﻟﻔ ـﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻻﺷﺗﻐﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺗﺩﺭﯾﺱ ﺍﺗﺳﻌﺕ ﺩﺍﺋﺭﺓ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻓﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﺛﻘﺎﻓﺗﻪ
ﺃﺳﻬﻡ ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﻓﻲ ﺇﺛﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺑﯾﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺩﯾﺩ ﻣﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﹶﺕ ﻣﻛﺎﻧﺗﻪ ،ﻓﻌﯾﻥ ﻗﺎﺿﯾﺎ ﺑﻣﺩﯾﻧﺔ ﺃﺩﺭﻧﺔ ،ﺛﻡ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻗﺿﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﻣﺻﻧﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﺃﺟﺎﺩ ﻭﺑﺭﻉ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺄﻟﯾﻔﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻﺳﯾﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﯾﺗﺻل ﻣﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺳﻛﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺻﻭﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻭﻻﯾﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﺿﻭل) ،(16ﺛﻡ ﻋﺯل ﻋﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ
ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺷﺭﻋﯾﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﯾﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺑﯾﺔ ،ﻗﺎل ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﺻﺏ ﻭﺃﻋﻁﻲ ﻣﺩﺭﺳﺔ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺣﺩﯾﺙ ﺑﺄﺩﺭﻧﺔ ،ﻭﻋﯾﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻛل
ﺍﻟﻁﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺳﻧﯾﺔ" :ﻛﺎﻥ – ﺭﺣﻣﻪ ﺍﷲ – ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﻋﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺳﯾﺭ، ﯾﻭﻡ ﻣﺎﺋﺔ ﺩﺭﻫﻡ).(17
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺣﺩﯾﺙ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻧﺣﻭ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺻﺭﯾﻑ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺑﯾﺎﻥ، ﺗﺩﺭﺝ ﺑﻌﺩﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺳﻠﻣﻪ ﻟﻠﻣﻧﺎﺻﺏ ﺍﻟﺭﻓﯾﻌﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺻﺎﺭ
ﻭﺍﻟﻛﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻧﻁﻕ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻭل ،ﻭﻏﯾﺭ ﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺑﺣﯾﺙ ﺇﻧﻪ ﺗﻔﺭﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻔﺗﯾﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺳﻁﻧﻁﯾﻧﯾﺔ ﺑﻌﺩ ﻭﻓﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﻟﻰ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺟﻣﺎﻟﻲ ،ﻭﺑﻘﻲ ﻓﻲ
ﺇﺗﻘﺎﻥ ﻛل ﻋﻠﻡ ﻣﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﻭﻗﻠﹼﻣﺎ ﯾﻭﺟﺩ ﻓﻥ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻧﻭﻥ ﺇﻻ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﺻﺏ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﷲ ﺳﻧﺔ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﯾﻥ ﻭﺗﺳﻌﻣﺎﺋﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻬﺩ
ﻭﻟﻪ ﻣﺻﻧﻑ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺻﻧﻔﺎﺕ").(22 ﺳﻠﯾﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻭﻧﻲ).(18
ﻭﻗﺩ ﺭﺗﹼﺏ ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﻋﻘﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺟﻭﻫﺭ ﻣﺅﻟﻔﺎﺕ "ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل" ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺣﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺟﻡ ،ﻓﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺋﺗﻲ ﻣﺻﻧﻑ ،ﻣﻭﺯﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻛﺎﻧﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﯾﺔ
ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺿﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺗﺎﻟﯾﺔ):(23 ﺧﻠﹼﻑ ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ ﺗﺭﺍﺛﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻣﯾﺎ ﻋﻅﯾﻣﺎ ﯾﻛﺷﻑ ﻋﻥ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺳﯾﺭ ﻭﻋﻠﻭﻣﻪ ).(12 ﻣﻭﺳﻭﻋﯾﺗﻪ ﻭﻣﻛﺎﻧﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺭﻓﯾﻌﺔ ،ﺧﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺷﺭﯾﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﯾﺔ،
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺣﺩﯾﺙ ).(8 ﻭﺃﺛﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﻛﺗﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﺫﺧﺎﺋﺭ ﻭﺭﻭﺍﺋﻊ ﻗلّ ﻧﻅﯾﺭﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻡ ﯾﺗﺭﻙ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ).(43 ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺩﺧﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻡ ﯾﻐﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻣﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻧﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻟﻪ ﻓﯾﻪ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺳﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻛﻼﻡ ).(50 ﻣﺻﻧﻑ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﻋﺟﺏ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻔﻭﻕ ﺗﻌﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺅﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﻣﺋﺗﻲ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ).(22 ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻛﺗﺎﺏ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﻣﺗﻥ ،ﻭﺷﺭﺡ ،ﻭﺣﺎﺷﯾﺔ ،ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻡ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻁﻕ ).(8 ﯾﻘﺗﺻﺭ ﻓﯾﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺑﯾﺔ ،ﺑل ﺃﻟﹼﻑ ﻭﺻﻧﹼﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺎﺭﺳﯾﺔ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﺻﻭﻑ ).(2 ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﯾﺔ ﺃﯾﺿﺎ.
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ).(2 ﻭﻟﻣﻛﺎﻧﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻛل ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﺃﺛﻧﻰ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻣﺩﺣﻭﻩ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺿﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺳﻭﻋﯾﺔ ).(21 ﺑﻣﺎ ﻫﻭ ﺃﻫل ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻥ ﻫﺅﻻﺀ ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﺷﻘﺎﺋﻕ ﺍﻟﻧﻌﻣﺎﻧﯾﺔ ﻓﻘﺩ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺳﯾﺔ ﻭﻗﻭﺍﻋﺩﻫﺎ ).(2 ﻗﺎل" :ﻭﻛﺎﻥ -ﺭﺣﻣﻪ ﺍﷲ – ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺫﯾﻥ ﺻﺭﻓﻭﺍ ﺟﻣﯾﻊ
ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺿﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﺧﺗﻠﻔﺔ ).(7 ﺃﻭﻗﺎﺗﻬﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻡ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﯾﺷﺗﻐل ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻡ ﻟﯾﻼﹰ ﻭﻧﻬﺎﺭﺍ ،ﻭﯾﻛﺗﺏ
ﻣﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺳﻌﺔ ﻣﺻﻧﻔﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﯾﺔ ،ﻭﺳﺑﻌﺔ ﻣﺻﻧﻔﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺟﻣﯾﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻧﺢ ﺑﺑﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺷﺭﯾﻑ ،ﻭﻗﺩ ﻓﺗﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﯾل ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻬﺎﺭ ﻭﻟﻡ ﯾﻔﺗﺭ
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺳﯾﺔ. ﻗﻠﻣﻪ .ﻭﺻﻧﹼﻑ ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﻛﺛﯾﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺑﺎﺣﺙ ﺍﻟﻣﻬﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﻣﺿﺔ...
ﻭﯾﺣﺳﻥ ﻫﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺫﻛﺭ ﻣﺻﻧﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ: ﻭﻛل ﺗﺻﺎﻧﯾﻔﻪ ﻣﻘﺑﻭﻟﺔ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻧﺎﺱ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺃﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺳﻧﻪ
.1ﺗﻐﯾﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ )ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﻟﻠﺳﻛﹼﺎﻛﻲ(. ﻭﺃﺩﺏ ﺗﺎﻡ ﻭﻋﻘل ﻭﺍﻓﺭ ﻭﺗﻘﺭﯾﺭ ﺣﺳﻥ ﻣﻠﺧﺹ .ﻭﻟﻪ ﺗﺣﺭﯾﺭ
.2ﺣﺎﺷﯾﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ )ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺑﺎﺡ( ﺷﺭﺡ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﻟﻠﺳﯾﺩ ﺍﻟﺷﺭﯾﻑ. ﻣﻘﺑﻭل ﺟﺩﺍ ﻹﯾﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻊ ﻭﺿﻭﺡ ﺩﻻﻟﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺍﺩ .ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺟﻣﻠﺔ
.3ﺗﻭﺟﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻹﺑﺭﺍﻫﯾﻣﯾﺔ. ﺃﻧﺳﻰ) – (19ﺭﺣﻣﻪ ﺍﷲ – ﺫﻛﺭ ﺍﻟﺳﻠﻑ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻧﺎﺱ ﻭﺃﺣﯾﺎ ﺭِﺑﺎﻉ
.4ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ) .ﺣﻘﻘﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻗﻧﯾﺑﻲ، ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻡ ﺑﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻧﺩﺭﺍﺱ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺑﻼﹰ ﺭﺍﺳﺧﹰﺎ ﻭﻁﻭﺩﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﺧﹰﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ
ﻭﻧﺷﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺟﻠﺔ ﻣﺟﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺑﯾﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻧﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻌﺩﺩ ﻣﻥ ﻣﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﻧﯾﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻧﺑﻌﺎ ﻟﻠﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﯾﺎ .ﺭﻭﺡ ﺭﻭﺣﻪ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺩ
،36ﺍﻟﺳﻧﺔ ،13ﺟﻣﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ 1409ﻫ -ﺣﺯﯾﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻏﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﺟﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﺗﻭﺣﻪ").(20
.(1989 ﻭﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻁﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺳﻧﯾﺔ ﺣﯾﺙ ﻗﺎل " :ﻛﺎﻥ -ﺭﺣﻣﻪ ﺍﷲ –
.5ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺳﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺣﻛﯾﻡ )ﺣﻘﻘﻬﺎ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﺍﻟﺻﺎﻣل، ﻓﻲ ﻛﺛﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﺄﻟﯾﻑ ﻭﺳﺭﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺻﻧﯾﻑ ﻭﻭﺳﻊ ﺍﻻﻁﻼﻉ ﺑﻛﺛﯾﺭ ﻣﻥ
ﻭﻧﺷﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺟﻠﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﺳﻌﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺭﻭﻣﯾﺔ ﻧﻅﯾﺭﺍ ﻟﻠﺣﺎﻓﻅ ﺟﻼل ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﺳﯾﻭﻁﻲ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﯾﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻌﺩﺩ ،1ﺷﻌﺑﺎﻥ 1416ﻫ ـ(. ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺭﯾﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻧﺩﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ ﺃﺩﻕ ﻧﻅﺭﺍ ﻣﻥ
.6ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺍﻟﺗﻐﻠﯾﺏ) ،ﺣﻘﻘﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺻﺭ ﺳﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺷﯾﺩ ﺍﻟﺳﯾﻭﻁﻲ ،ﻭﺃﺣﺳﻥ ﻓﻬﻣﺎ ﻭﺃﻛﺛﺭ ﺗﺻﺭﻓﹰﺎ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻬﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﺟﻣﺎل
ﻭﻫﻧﺎ ﻧﺟﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﺳﯾﺭ ﻭﻓﻕ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻟﻔﻧﺎﻩ ﻣﻥ ﻗﺑل ﻓﻲ ﺿﻣﻥ "ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ"(.
ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﺍﻟﺳﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻓﻘﺩ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﯾﻬﺎ" :ﻭﺑﻌﺩ ﻓﻬﺫﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺭﺗﺑﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺍﻟﺧﻭﺍﺹ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺯﺍﯾﺎ. .7
ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ". ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ) ،ﺣﻘﻘﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺻﺭ ﺳﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺷﯾﺩ .8
ﻭﻣﻣﺎ ﯾﻭﺛﹼﻕ ﻧﺳﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﱢﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺻﺎﺣﺑﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻧﻧﺎ ﻧﺟﺩ ﻋﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺿﻣﻥ" ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ"(.
ﯾﻛﺛﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻬﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ،ﯾﻧﻘل ﻋﻧﻬﻡ ،ﺃﻭ ﯾﻧﺎﻗﺷﻬﻡ ﻭﯾﻌﺗﺭﺽ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﻭﺳﻊ) ،ﺣﻘﻘﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺻﺭ ﺳﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺷﯾﺩ ﺿﻣﻥ .9
ﻋﻠﯾﻬﻡ ،ﻭﻫﺅﻻﺀ ﻫﻡ: "ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ"(.
ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺯﻭﻗﻲ )ﺷﺭﺡ ﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﻣﺎﺳﺔ(. ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻧﻅﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺻﯾﺎﻏﺔ )ﺣﻘﻘﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﺩ .10
ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﺎﻑ )ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﺯﻣﺧﺷﺭﻱ(. ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻗﻧﯾﺑﻲ ،ﻭﻧﺷﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺟﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﯾﺔ،
ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﻑ )ﻭﻫﻭ ﻋﻣﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺯﻭﯾﻧﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻛﺷﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﺩ ،72-71ﺭﺟﺏ 1406ﻫ ـ ،ﺍﻟﺳﻧﺔ .(18
ﺣﺎﺷﯾﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﹼﺎﻑ(. ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﺿﻣﯾﻥ. .11
ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ) :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﺳﻛﹼﺎﻛﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ :ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ. .12
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ(. ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﯾﻣﺎ ﯾﻌﺗﺑﺭ ﻋﻧﺩ ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﻋﻠﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲ. .13
ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ )ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﺧﻁﯾﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺯﻭﯾﻧﻲ،ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﻫﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ. .14
ﻧﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ(. ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻠﻡ ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺎﻥ. .15
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿل ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ )ﺳﻌﺩﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺷﺭﺡ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻠﻭﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﺧﻁﺎﺏ. .16
ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ(. ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﻭﺗﻔﺻﯾل ﺃﺣﻭﺍﻟﻪ. .17
ﻭﻗﺩ ﺗﺭﺩﺩ ﺫﻛﺭﻫﻡ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻭﯾﺑﺩﻭ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻟﹼﻑ ﻗﺩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻘﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺍﺋﺩ. .18
ﺃﻟﻔﻬﻡ ﻭﺍﻋﺗﺎﺩ ﻣﻧﺎﻗﺷﺗﻬﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻧﻬﻡ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺛﯾﺭ ﻣﻥ ﻣﺅﻟﻔﺎﺗﻪ. ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺍﻟﻛﻧﺎﯾﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ. .19
ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﯾﺟﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﻹﻁﻧﺎﺏ. .20
ﺏ( ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ:
ﺗﺗﻧﺎﻭل ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻭﺿﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻭﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎﺗﻪ،ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﺗﻭﺛﯾﻕ ﻧﺳﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻟﻑ
ﻣﺣﻁﹼ ﺍﻫﺗﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻧﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﯾﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺫﯾﻥ ﻗﺩﻣﻭﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺗﻬﻡ ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ ﻛﺛﯾﺭﺓ ﻭﻣﺗﻧﻭﻋﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺗﻔﺻﯾﻼﹰ ﻟﺻﻭﺭﻩ ﻭﺃﻧﻭﺍﻋﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻓﺎﺿﻭﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺗﻔﺭﯾﻌﺎﺗﻪ، ﺍﻟﻣﺗﺭﺟﻣﻭﻥ ﻟﻪ ﯾﺫﻛﺭﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﻛﺛﯾﺭﺓ ﻗﺩ ﺗﺭﺑﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻻﺳﯾﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺩ ﻅﻬﻭﺭ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺣﻘﯾﻘﺔ ﻭﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻋﻧﺩ ﻋﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺛﻼﺛﻣﺎﺋﺔ ﻋﻧﺩ ﺑﻌﺿﻬﻡ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﺩ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﺋل ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﺋل
ﺍﻟﻘﺭﻥ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻟﺙ ﺍﻟﻬﺟﺭﻱ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺟﺢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻣﻥ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺣﺟﻡ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﺣﺛﻭﻥ ﻋﻥ ﺗﺗﺑﱡﻌﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﯾﺎﻥ ﻋﻧﺎﻭﯾﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﻧﻭﻧﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻛﺗﻔﻭﺍ
ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺗﺯﻟﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺛﺎﻟﻬﻡ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺗﻛﻠﻣﯾﻥ. ﺑﺫﻛﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻁﻠﻌﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ﻣﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻁ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺗﺗﺑﻊ ﻟﻠﺑﺩﺍﯾﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﻟﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﻁﻠﺢ ﻓﻲ ﻛﺗﺏ ﻭﻣﻥ ﻋﺭﻑ ﺃﺳﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﻗﺭﺃ ﺑﻌﺽ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ،
ﺍﻟﻧﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﯾﻥ ،ﯾﺟﺩ ﺃﻥ "ﺍﻟﺟﺎﺣﻅ" ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻭﺍﺋل ﻣﻥ ﺗﻛﻠﻣﻭﺍ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻥ ﯾﺟﺩ ﻣﺷﻛﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻭ ﻟﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻟﯾﺱ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻥ
ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻘﺩ ﻗﺎل ﻓﻲ ﻛﺗﺎﺏ "ﺍﻟﺣﯾﻭﺍﻥ"" :ﻭﻗﺩ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﺋل ،ﻓﻣﻣﺎ ﯾﻣﯾﺯ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ،ﺃﻧﻪ ﺩﺭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻣﻁ ﻣﻌﯾﻥ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺏ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻘﻭﻟﻭﺍ :ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﺍﻟﺳﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﯾﻭﻡ ﺑﺄﻣﺭ ﻋﻅﯾﻡ ،ﻭﻗﺩ ﻗﺎل ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺭﯾﻑ ﺑﻣﻭﺿﻭﻋﻬﺎ ،ﺇﺫ ﯾﻘﻭل ﺑﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﻣﯾﺩ" :ﻓﻬﺫﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﺷﺎﻋﺭ: ﺭﺗﺑﻧﺎﻫﺎ" ،ﺃﻭ "ﻓﻬﺫﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺭﺗﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ" ،ﻭﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ
ﺭﻋﯾﻧﺎﻩ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻭﺍ ﻏِﺿﺎﺑﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﻘﹶﻁﹶ ﺍﻟﺳﻣﺎﺀ ﺑﺄﺭﺽِ ﻗﻭﻡٍ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﺍﻵﺗﯾﺔ:
- -ﻭﺑﻌﺩ ﻓﻬﺫﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺭﺗﹼﺑﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛﺎﺩ ﻭﺗﻭﺿﯾﺢ ﻁﺭﯾﻕ
ﻓﺯﻋﻣﻭﺍ ﺃﻧﻬﻡ ﯾﺭﻋﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺳﻣﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺳﻣﺎﺀ ﺗﺳﻘﻁ") (28ﻭﻗﺎل: ﺍﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎﻟﻪ).(24
"ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﺏ ﻫﻭ ﻣﻔﺧﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻟﻐﺗﻬﻡ ،ﻭﺑﻪ ﻭﺑﺄﺷﺑﺎﻫﻪ - -ﻭﺑﻌﺩ ﻓﻬﺫﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺭﺗﹼﺑﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ ﻭﺗﻔﺻﯾل ﻣﺎ
ﺍﺗﺳﻌﺕ").(29 ﯾﺗﻌﻠﻕ ﺑﻬﺎ).(25
ﻭﺃﻓﺭﺩ "ﺍﺑﻥ ﻗﺗﯾﺑﺔ" ﻟﻬﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻥ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ ،ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﺧﺗﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻧﺎﺱ ﻓﯾﻪ، - -ﻭﺑﻌﺩ ﻓﻬﺫﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺭﺗﺑﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﺎ ﯾﺗﻌﻠﻕ ﺑﺎﻟﺿﻣﺎﺋﺭ ﻣﻥ
ﻓﻘﺎل" :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻣﻥ ﺟﻬﺗﻪ ﻏﻠﻁ ﻛﺛﯾﺭ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻧﺎﺱ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﺄﻭﯾل، )(26
ﺍﻷﻭﻫﺎﻡ.
ﻭﺗﺷﻌﺑﺕ ﺑﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﻁﺭﻕ ﻭﺍﺧﺗﻠﻔﺕ ﺍﻟﻧﺣل") (30ﻭﻗﺎل" :ﺗﺑﯾﻥ ﻟﻣﻥ - -ﻭﺑﻌﺩ ﻓﻬﺫﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺭﺗﹼﺑﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻧﻅﻡ
ﻋﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻭل ﯾﻘﻊ ﻓﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ،ﻓﯾﻘﺎل :ﻗﺎل ﺍﻟﺣﺎﺋﻁ ﻭﺍﻟﺻﯾﺎﻏﺔ).(27
ﻗﺳﻣﯾﻥ :ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺭﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ،ﻓﻘﺎل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺭﺩ" :ﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﻛﻠﻣﺔ ل ﺑﺭﺃﺳﻙ ﺇﻟﻲ :ﺃﻱ ﺃﻣﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻟﺕ ﺍﻟﻧﺎﻗﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺎل ﻓﻣﺎل ،ﻭﻗ ّ
ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻏﯾﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﺕ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺻﻁﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺗﺧﺎﻁﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺑﻌﯾﺭ").(31
ﻭﺟﻪ ﯾﺻﺢ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺭﯾﻧﺔ ﻋﺩﻡ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﻲ") (40ﻭﻫﻭ ﻭﻓﺭﻕ "ﺍﺑﻥ ﺟﻧﹼﻲ" ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻘﺎل" :ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﺔ ﻣﺎ
"ﻟﻐﻭﻱ ﻭﺷﺭﻋﻲ ﻭﺧﺎﺹ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺎﻡ") ،(41ﻭﻗﺎل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ" :ﻫﻭ ﺃﻗﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻل ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣل ﻓﯾﻣﺎ ﺷﺑﻪ ﺑﻣﻌﻧﺎﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺿﺩ ﺫﻟﻙ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻣﺎ ﯾﻘﻊ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻭﺗﻌﺩل ﺇﻟﯾﻪ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﺔ
ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﻟﻠﻣﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﻫﻭ ﺑﺷﻛل ﺃﻭﺿﺢ :ﺍﻟﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣل ﻓﻲ ﻟﻣﻌﺎﻥ ﺛﻼﺙ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻻﺗﺳﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻭﻛﯾﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻫﺫﻩ
ﻏﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ،ﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻏﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﺑﻬﺔ ،ﻣﻊ ﻗﺭﯾﻧﺔٍ ﺍﻷﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺑﺗﹼﺔ").(32
ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻥ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻣﻌﻧﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ").(42 ﻭﻋﺩ "ﺍﺑﻥ ﺭﺷﯾﻕ" ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺩﻟﯾل ﺍﻟﻔﺻﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﺔ
ﻭ"ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ" ﻓﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺗﻪ ﻣﻭﺿﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﯾﻘﺩﻡ ﻓﻘﺎل" :ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺏ ﻛﺛﯾﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺳﺗﻌﻣل ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻭﺗﻌﺩﻩ ﻣﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺧﺭ
ﻣﺣﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺟﺩﯾﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﺧﺭﻭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﺫﯾﻥ ﺳﺑﻘﻭﻩ، ﻛﻼﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺩﻟﯾل ﺍﻟﻔﺻﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﺕ ﻟﻐﺗﻬﺎ
ﻓﺗﺣﺩﺙ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺗﻰ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ "ﺍﻟﺳﻛﺎﻛﻲ" ﻭ"ﺍﻟﻘﺯﻭﯾﻧﻲ" ﻋﻥ ﺳﺎﺋﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ...ﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﺩﺍ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﺎﺋﻕ ﻣﻥ ﺟﻣﯾﻊ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻟﻡ ﯾﻛﻥ
ﻭﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺻﻭﺭ ﻓﯾﻬﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺩﻡ ﺗﻔﺻﯾﻼﹰ ﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎﺗﻬﻣﺎ ،ﻓﺟﻌل ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺭﺩ ﻣﺣﺎﻻﹰ ﻣﺣﺿﺎ ﻓﻬﻭ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ").(33
ﻓﻲ ﻗﺳﻣﯾﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻗﺳﻣﯾﻥ ،ﻓﻘﺎل" :ﻓﺎﻷﻗﺳﺎﻡ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ :ﺍﻷﻭل ﻭﻗﺩ ﺃﺧﺫ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻥ ﻣﻧﺯﻟﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﺗﻘﺭﺕ ﻗﻭﺍﻋﺩﻩ ﻭﺃﺻﻭﻟﻪ ﻋﻧﺩﻣﺎ
ﻣﻧﻬﺎ :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻟﻔﻅﹰﺎ ﻣﻔﺭﺩﺍ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ "ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﺭﺟﺎﻧﻲ" ﻛﺗﺎﺑﯾﻪ "ﺩﻻﺋل ﺍﻹﻋﺟﺎﺯ"
ﻭﺿﻌﺎ ﺷﺧﺻﯾﺎ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻣﻔﺭﺩ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺛﻠﺗﻪ ﺃﻛﺛﺭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺣﺻﻰ. ﻭ"ﻭﺃﺳﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﺔ" ﻓﻘﺩ ﻋﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺑﻘﻭﻟﻪ" :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻛل
ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻟﻔﻅﹰﺎ ﻣﺭﻛﺑﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻣﺎ ﻛﻠﻣﺔ ﺃﺭﯾﺩ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻏﯾﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻌﺕ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻭﺍﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻟﻣﻼﺣﻅﺔ
ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﺎ ﺷﺧﺻﯾﺎ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻣﺭﻛﺏ ،ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺳﻡ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﻭل ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺷﺋﺕ ﻗﻠﺕ :ﻛل ﻛﻠﻣﺔ
ﻻ ﯾﻭﺟﺩ ﺇﻻ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﯾﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺳل ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﺟﺯﺕ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻌﺕ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻭﺍﺿﻊ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻡ ﺗﻭﺿﻊ
ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻛﻧﺎﯾﺔ. ﻟﻪ ،ﻣﻥ ﻏﯾﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺳﺗﺄﻧﻑ ﻓﯾﻬﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﺎ ﻟﻣﻼﺣﻅﺔ ﺑﯾﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺟﻭﺯ
ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻟﺙ :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻟﻔﻅﹰﺎ ﻣﻔﺭﺩﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻣﺎ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺇﻟﯾﻪ ،ﻭﺑﯾﻥ ﺃﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻭﺿﻌﺕ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻭﺍﺿﻌﻬﺎ
ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﺎ ﻧﻭﻋﯾﺎ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺎﻥ. ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ").(34
ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺍﺑﻊ :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻟﻔﻅﺎﹰ ﻣﺭﻛﺑﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺳﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻋﻘﻠﻲ ﻭﻟﻐﻭﻱ ،ﻭﻓﺭﻕ ﺑﯾﻧﻬﻣﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻭﺻل
ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﺎﹰ ﻧﻭﻋﯾﺎﹰ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﺍﻟﻬﯾﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﯾﺑﯾﺔ ﻛﻘﻭﻟﻬﺎ: ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ "ﯾﻧﺑﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺣﻘﻙ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﺩﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻔﺿﻲ ﻓﻲ
﴿ﻗﹶﺎﻟﹶﺕﹾ ﺭﺏِّ ﺇِﻧِّﻲ ﻭﺿﻌﺗﹸﻬﺎ ﺃُﻧﹾﺛﹶﻰ﴾ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﯾﺋﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺟﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺟﻣﻠﺔ ﺑﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻭ ﺣﻘﯾﻘﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻧﻅﺭ ﺇﻟﯾﻬﺎ ﻣﻥ ﺟﻬﺗﯾﻥ :ﺃﺣﺩﺍﻫﻣﺎ:
ﻣﻭﺿﻭﻋﺔ ﻟﻺﺧﺑﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻗﺩ ﺍﺳﺗﻌﯾﺭﺕ ﻹﻅﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﺯﻥ").(43 ﺃﻥ ﺗﻧﻅﺭ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻹﺛﺑﺎﺕ ﺃﻫﻭ ﻓﻲ ﺣﻘﻪ ﻭﻣﻭﺿﻌﻪ،
ﺛﻡ ﻗﺩﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺗﻪ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎ ﺁﺧﺭ ﻟﻠﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺯﻋﻡ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺗﻔﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ، ﺃﻡ ﻗﺩ ﺯﺍل ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﯾﻧﺑﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﻓﯾﻪ .ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﯾﺔ :ﺃﻥ
ﻗﺳﻡ ﺑﻣﻭﺟﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺧﻣﺳﺔ ﺃﻗﺳﺎﻡ ﻫﻲ :ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺑﻠﯾﻎ، ﺗﻧﻅﺭ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺛﺑﺕ ،ﺃﻋﻧﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ﺍﻹﺛﺑﺎﺕ ،ﻛﺎﻟﺣﯾﺎﺓ
ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﺻﺭﯾﺣﯾﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﻬﻛﻣﯾﺔ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻭﻟﻙ" :ﺃﺣﯾﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺯﯾﺩﺍ" ﺃﺛﺎﺑﺕ ﻫﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﺔ ﺃﻡ ﻗﺩ ﻋﺩل
ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺳل ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ).(44 ﺑﻪ ﻋﻧﻪ"). (35
ﻭﯾﻅﻬﺭ ﻣﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﺃﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ "ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل" ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺩﺧل ﻭﺍﺗﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﺭﺟﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺣﺩﯾﺛﻪ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ
ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ،ﺑﯾﻧﻣﺎ ﻋﺩﻫﺎ "ﺍﻟﺳﻛﹼﺎﻛﻲ" ﻭﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﻭﻥ ﻭﺃﻗﺳﺎﻣﻪ) .(36ﻭﻋﺭﻑ ﺍﺑﻥ ﺍﻷﺛﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺑﻘﻭﻟﻪ" :ﻫﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺭﯾﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﺳﺎﺑﻘﻭﻥ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺣﺳﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺑﺩﯾﻌﯾﺔ ،ﻓﻲ ﺣﯾﻥ ﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎﺕ ﻏﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺿﻭﻉ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺻل ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ") ،(37ﺛﻡ ﺟﺎﺀ
ﺍﻷﺧﺭﻯ ﺿﻣﻥ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﻥ ﻟﻠﻣﺟﺎﺯ. ﺍﻟﺳﻛﺎﻛﻲ ﻭﻋﺭﻓﻪ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ" :ﺍﻟﻛﻠﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻏﯾﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ
ﻭﻟﻡ ﯾﻛﺗﻑ ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﻬﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎ ﺁﺧﺭ ﻣﻭﺿﻭﻋﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺍﺳﺗﻣﺎﻻ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﯾﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻧﺳﺑﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻧﻭﻉ
ﯾﻘﻭﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘل ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﺛﺑﺎﺗﻪ ﻓﯾﻪ ،ﻗﺎل: ﺣﻘﯾﻘﺗﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺭﯾﻧﺔ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻣﻌﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﻧﻭﻉ").(38
"ﻭﻟﻠﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺑﻭﺟﻪ ﺁﺧﺭ ﺍﺧﺗﺭﻋﻧﺎﻩ ﺃﯾﺿﺎ ﻭﻫﻭ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ ﻭﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻱ ﺣﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻭﺃﻭﺿﺢ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻣﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎل" :ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ
ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﺍﻋﺗﺑﺭ ﻓﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﻣﻧﻘﻭﻻ ﻋﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺎﺩ ﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﻏﯾﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺻﻁﻠﺢ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻓﯾﻪ
ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﻣﻧﻘﻭﻻ ﻋﻧﻪ ،ﺑل ﺛﺎﺑﺗﹰﺎ ﻓﯾﻪ ﻣﺗﻘﺭﺭﺍ: ﺍﻟﺗﺧﺎﻁﺏ ﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻷﻭل ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ").(39
ﻭﺍﻷﻭل :ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻲ ﯾﻧﺗﻅﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﺳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﻭﻗﺩ ﺣﺎﻭل ﺍﻟﺧﻁﯾﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺯﻭﯾﻧﻲ ﻓﻲ "ﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ" ﻭ"ﺍﻹﯾﺿﺎﺡ"
ﺍﻟﻣﺎﺭ ﺫﻛﺭﻩ ﺁﻧﻔﹰﺎ ،ﺧﻼ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﯾﻬﺎ ﺧﻼﻓﹰﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﻋﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺧﺭﻭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻧﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﺧﻁﹼﻪ ﺍﻟﺟﺭﺟﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻓﻘﺳﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺇﻟﻰ
ﺑﺎﻟﺣﺭﻑ )ﺃ( ،ﻭﻗﺩ ﺟﻌﻠﺗﻬﺎ ﺑﻣﺛﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻧﺳﺧﺔ ﺍﻷﻡ ﻟﻭﺿﻭﺣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻣﺎ ﻭﺻﻔﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻭﻱ
ﻭﺗﻣﺎﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻌﺩل ﺍﻷﺳﻁﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺻﻔﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻭﺍﺣﺩﺓ ﺗﺳﻌﺔ -ﻛﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﻏﯾﺭﻧﺎ – ﻟﻌﺩﻡ ﺻﺩﻗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﻓﻲ
ﻋﺷﺭ ﺳﻁﺭﺍ ،ﻭﯾﺣﺗﻭﻱ ﻛل ﺳﻁﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻭﺍﻟﻲ ﺇﺣﺩﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺷﺭﻋﻲ ﺑﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻁﻼﻗﻪ ﯾﻧﺗﻅﻡ
ﻋﺷﺭﺓ ﻛﻠﻣﺔ ﺗﻘﺭﯾﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻛﺗﻭﺑﺔ ﺑﺧﻁ ﺍﻟﻧﺳﺦ ،ﻭﺗﺗﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺷﺭﻋﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻥ ﻋﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ
ﻣﻥ ﺧﻣﺱ ﻭﺭﻗﺎﺕ. ﯾﺿﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﻭﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺛﻼﺛﺔ ،ﺛﻡ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﻋﻧﺩ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﻭﻱ ﻟﻡ ﯾﻛﻥ
.2ﻧﺳﺧﺔ ﻣﺭﻛﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻙ ﻓﯾﺻل ﻟﻠﺑﺣﻭﺙ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺻﻭﺭﺓ ﻋﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺻﯾﺭﺓ.
ﻧﺳﺧﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺑﺭﯾﻁﺎﻧﯾﺔ ﺭﻗﻡ ) ،(9687/ 3-9ﻭﻗﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ :ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻋﻘﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻹﻗﺑﺎل ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺑﺎﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻭل"ﺍﻟﺧﻧﺳﺎﺀ:
ﺭﻣﺯﺕ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺣﺭﻑ )ﺏ( ،ﻭﻣﻌﺩل ﺍﻷﺳﻁﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺻﻔﺣﺔ
)(45
ﺍﻟﻭﺍﺣﺩﺓ ﻋﺷﺭﻭﻥ ﺳﻁﺭﺍ ،ﻭﯾﺣﺗﻭﻱ ﻛل ﺳﻁﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻭﺍﻟﻲ ﻓﺈﻧﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇﻗﺑﺎل ﻭﺇﺩﺑﺎﺭ" ................
ﺛﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻋﺷﺭﺓ ﻛﻠﻣﺔ ﺗﻘﺭﯾﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻛﺗﻭﺑﺔ ﺑﺧﻁ ﺍﻟﻧﺳﺦ،
ﻭﺗﺗﻛﻭﻥ ﻣﻥ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻭﺭﻗﺎﺕ.
.3ﻧﺳﺧﺔ ﻣﺭﻛﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﻙ ﻓﯾﺻل ﻟﻠﺑﺣﻭﺙ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺻﻭﺭﺓ ﻋ ـﻥ ﻭﻭﻗﻑ "ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل" ﻋﻧﺩ ﻓﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ،ﻭﺭﺃﻯ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻛﻣﻥ ﻓﻲ
ﻧﺳﺧﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻣ ـﺣﻣﺩﯾﺔ ﺭﻗ ـﻡ ) ،(4178ﻭﻗﺩ ﺭﻣﺯﺕ ﻓﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺗﺗﺿﻣﻥ ﺃﻧﻭﺍﻋﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ" :ﺯﯾﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﻘﺭﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﻓﻲ
ﻟﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺣﺭﻑ )ﺝ( ،ﻭﻣﻌﺩل ﺍﻷﺳﻁﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺻﻔﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻭﺍﺣﺩﺓ ﺫﻫﻥ ﺍﻟﺳﺎﻣﻊ") ،(46ﻭﺃﻛﹼﺩ ﺃﻥ "ﺍﻟﺳﻛﹼﺎﻛﻲ" ﻏﹶﻔِل ﻋﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﯾﻥ ﻗﺳﻡ
ﺳﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﺷﺭ ﺳﻁﺭﺍ ،ﻭﯾﺣﺗﻭﻱ ﻛل ﺳﻁﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻭﺍﻟﻲ ﺗﺳﻊ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻣﻥ ﺣﯾﺙ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﺗﺿﻣﻥ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻭﺧﺎلٍ ﻋﻧﻬﺎ).(47
ﻛﻠﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻘﺭﯾﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻛﺗﻭﺑﺔ ﺑﺧﻁ ﺍﻟﻧﺳﺦ ،ﻭﺗﺗﻛﻭﻥ ﻣﻥ ﻭﯾﻣﻛﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻭل ﺇﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺩﻋﻭﺓ ﻟﻠﺧﺭﻭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺳﺑﻊ ﻭﺭﻗﺎﺕ. ﻣﺩﺭﺳﺔ "ﺍﻟﺳﻛﹼﺎﻛﻲ" ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻫﯾﻣﻧﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﻲ
ﻓﻲ ﺗﻠﻙ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺣﻠﺔ ،ﺑﺩﺀﺃً ﺑﻛﺗﺎﺑﻪ "ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ" ﻭﻣﻥ ﺛﻡ ﺷﺭﻭﺣﻪ
ﻫ( ﻣﻧﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ:
ﻭﺗﻠﺧﯾﺻﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺣﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﻟﻼﻧﺗﻘﺎل ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺄﺛﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﻧﻁﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﺳﻔﺔ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻧﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻓﺳﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻧﺣﻭ ﺍﻵﺗﻲ: ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﯾﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻓﻬﻡ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﺔ.
ﻗﺭﺍﺀﺓ ﻧﺳﺦ ﺍﻟﻣﺧﻁﻭﻁ ﻗﺭﺍﺀﺓ ﺩﻗﯾﻘﺔ ﻻﺧﺗﯾﺎﺭ ﻧﺳﺧﺔ ﺍﻷﺻل. .1
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻧﺳﺦ ﺍﻷﺧﺭﻯ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺧﻁﻭﻁ ﺍﻷﺻل. .2 ﺝ( ﻣﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻟﻑ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺗﻪ:
ﺗﺧﺭﯾﺞ ﺍﻵﯾﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺭﺁﻧﯾﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﯾﺙ ﺍﻟﻧﺑﻭﯾﺔ. .3 ﺍﻋﺗﻣﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻟﻑ ﻓﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﺗﻌﺩﺩﺓ ﻫﻲ:
ﺗﺧﺭﯾﺞ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺍﻭﯾﻥ ﻭﻛﺗﺏ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ .4 ﺷﺭﺡ ﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﻣﺎﺳﺔ ﻟﻠﻣﺭﺯﻭﻗﻲ.
ﺷﻁﺭ ﺑﯾﺕ ﯾﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺷﻁﺭ ﺍﻵﺧﺭ ﺑﻧﻘﻁ ،ﻭﯾﻛﺗﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺩﻻﺋل ﺍﻹﻋﺟﺎﺯ ﻟﻌﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﺭﺟﺎﻧﻲ.
ﺍﻟﺣﺎﺷﯾﺔ :ﻭﺗﻣﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺫﺍ... ﺍﻟﻛﺷﺎﻑ ﻟﻠﺯﻣﺧﺷﺭﻱ.
-ﯾﻌﺩ ﻛل ﺷﻁﺭ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﺟﺯ ﺑﯾﺗﹰﺎ ﻣﺳﺗﻘﻼﹰ ،ﻭﯾﻛﺗﺏ ﻭﺳﻁ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﺎﻑ ﻟﻌﻣﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺳﻲ.
ﺍﻟﺻﻔﺣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺳﻁﺭ ﻣﻧﻔﺭﺩ. ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﻟﻠﺳﻛﹼﺎﻛﻲ.
-ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺗﻠﻔﺕ ﺭﻭﺍﯾﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺧﻁﻭﻁ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻋﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﯾﺔ ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﻟﻠﺧﻁﯾﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺯﻭﯾﻧﻲ.
ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺍﻭﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﺑﻭﻋﺔ ﺗﺛﺑﺕ ﺭﻭﺍﯾﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺧﻁﻭﻁ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﻭل ﺷﺭﺡ ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﻟﻠﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ.
ﺳﻠﯾﻣﺔ ،ﻭﯾﻛﺗﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺣﺎﺷﯾﺔ :ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ ﻛﺫﺍ... ﺍﻟﺗﻠﻭﯾﺢ ﻟﻠﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ.
ﺍﺳﺗﺧﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﻭﺍﺱ: .5 ﻛﺗﺏ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﻟﻠﻣﺅﻟﻑ ﻧﻔﺳﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ :ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ،
-ﺗﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻵﯾﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻛﺭﯾﻣﺔ ﺑﯾﻥ ﻣﺷﺟﺭﺗﯾﻥ . ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﺿﻣﯾﻥ ،ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺣﺎﺷﯾﺔ
ﺗﻛﺗﺏ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﯾﺙ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺗﻧﺻﯾﺹ ﻛﺑﯾﺭﺗﯾﻥ )) ((. .6 ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺗﻠﻭﯾﺢ.
ﺗﻛﺗﺏ ﺳﺎﺋﺭ ﺍﻻﻗﺗﺑﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺗﻧﺻﯾﺹ ﺻﻐﯾﺭﺗﯾﻥ. .7
ﺗﻛﺗﺏ ﻛل ﺍﻟﺯﯾﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﯾﻘﺗﺿﯾﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺳﯾﺎﻕ ﺑﯾﻥ ﻣﻌﻘﻔﺗﯾﻥ ][. .8 ﺩ( :ﻭﺻﻑ ﻧﺳﺦ ﺍﻟﻣﺧﻁﻭﻁ:
-ﺗﺷﺭﺡ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺻﻌﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺻﻁﻠﺣﺎﺕ ﺷﺭﺣﺎ ﺍﻋﺗﻣﺩﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻧﺳﺦ ﻫﻲ:
ﻣﺧﺗﺻﺭﺍ ﻭﺗﻭﺛﻕ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺣﺎﺷﯾﺔ. .1ﻧﺳﺧﺔ ﻣﺭﻛﺯ ﺍﻟﻭﺛﺎﺋﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺧﻁﻭﻁﺎﺕ – ﺍﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻧﯾﺔ،
ﺗﺻﺣﯾﺢ ﺍﻷﺧﻁﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻣﻼﺋﯾﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﻟﯾﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ .9 ﺷﺭﯾﻁ ﺭﻗﻡ ) (295ﻣﺟﺎﻣﯾﻊ ﻣﻥ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ،164-161ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺍﻟﺣﺎﺷﯾﺔ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﻁﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻣﺧﻠﹼﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻁﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻭﯾﺔ ﻣﺻﻭﺭﺓ ﻋﻥ ﻧﺳﺧﺔ "ﺑﺭﻧﺳﺗﻭﻥ" ﺭﻗﻡ ) (95ﻭﻗﺩ ﺭﻣﺯﺕ ﻟﻬﺎ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿل "ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ" ﻟﻌﺩﻡ ﻓﺭﻗﻪ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻭ( ﺍﻟﻧﺹ ﺍﻟﻣﺣﻘﻕ:
ﻻ ﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻓﻲ ﻫﯾﺋﺗﻪ ﺑل ﻓﻲ ﻣﺎﺩﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻬﯾﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﯾﺑﯾﺔ، ﺑﺳﻡ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺭﺣﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﺣﯾﻡ
ﺭﺩ ﻗﻭل ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ" :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﻓﻬﻭ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ ]ﺍﻟﺣﻣﺩ ﻟﻭﻟﯾﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺻﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺑﯾﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺻﺣﺑﻪ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺩ:
)(48
ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣل ﻓﯾﻣﺎ ﺷﺑﻪ ﺑﻣﻌﻧﺎﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﻟﻠﻣﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ،ﻛﻣﺎ ﻓﻬﺫﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺭﺗﹼﺑﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ[
ﯾﻘﺎل ﻟﻠﻣﺗﺭﺩﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻣﺭ" :ﺇﻧﹼﻲ ﺃﺭﺍﻙ ﺗﻘﺩﻡ ﺭﺟﻼﹰ ﻭﺗﺅﺧﹼﺭ ﺃﺧﺭﻯ،
ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﯾﺳﻣﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺑﯾل ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻭﻗﺩ ﯾﺳﻣﻰ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﻟﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ ﻣﻔﺭﺩﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺭﻛﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﻁﻠﻘﹰﺎ) .(61ﺣﯾﺙ ﻗﺎل ﻓﻲ ﺷﺭﺣﻪ" :ﻭﻫﻬﻧﺎ ﺑﺣﺙ ،ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺩ ﺗﻘﺭﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﺳﺎﻡ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ
ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﻛﻣﺎ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻘﺩ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﻏﯾﺭ ﺍﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ. ﺷﺧﺻﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻭ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﺎﺩﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻧﻭﻋﻲ ﻭﻫﻭ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻫﯾﺋﺗﻪ .ﻓﻼ
ﻭﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻭﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻟﻣﻌﺎﻧﯾﻬﺎ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﺟﺭﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﺳﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﻫﺫﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻌﯾﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﻗﺳﺎﻡ،
ﺍﻟﺷﺧﺹ ،ﻛﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺑﺎﺕ ﻟﻣﻌﺎﻧﯾﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﯾﺑﯾﺔ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺷﺧﺻﻲ
ﺍﻟﻧﻭﻉ ،ﻣﺛﻼﹰ ﻫﯾﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﯾﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻧﺣﻭ :ﺯﯾﺩ ﻗﺎﺋﻡ ،ﻣﻭﺿﻭﻋﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ ،ﺃﻭ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻊ
ﻟﻺﺧﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻹﺛﺑﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺗﻌﻣل ﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻏﯾﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻧﻭﻋﻲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻫﯾﺋﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻭل ﻻ
ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺩ ﻭﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﯾﯾﻥ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻛﻭﻥ ﺗﻠﻙ ﺍﻟﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭﻟﺔ ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﺕ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ
ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﺑﻬﺔ ﻓﺎﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻓﻐﯾﺭ ﺍﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﻛﻘﻭﻟﻪ ):(62 ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺭﺩ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻛﻭﻥ
)(63
ﻫﻭﺍﻱَ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺭﱠﻛﹾﺏِ ﺍﻟﯾﻣﺎﻧﯾﻥ ﯾﺻﻌﺩ ﺗﻠﻙ ﺍﻟﻬﯾﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭﻟﺔ ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﺕ ﻟﻪ ]ﻫﯾﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺭﺩ ﺃﻭ[) (49ﻫﯾﺋﺔ
................... ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﻣﻭﺿﻭﻉ ﻟﻺﺧﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺭﺽ ﻣﻧﻪ ﺇﻅﻬﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﻷﻗﺳﺎﻡ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ:
ﺍﻟﺗﺣﺯﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺣﺳﺭ ،ﻓﺣﺻﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻭل ﻣﻧﻬﺎ :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻟﻔﻅﹰﺎ ﻣﻔﺭﺩﺍ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻘل
ﻭﺗﻌﺭﯾﻔﻪ ﺑِﻡ ﺫﹸﻛﺭ ﻋﺩﻭل ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺻﻭﺍﺏ") (64ﺇﻟﻰ ﻫﻧﺎ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ. ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﺎ ﺷﺧﺻﯾﺎ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻣﻔﺭﺩ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺛﻠﺗﻪ ﺃﻛﺛﺭ ﻣﻥ
ﻭﺃﻧﺕ ﺑﻌﺩﻣﺎ ﻧﹸﺑﻬﺕﹶ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﻕ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺗﹸﻌﺩ).(50
ﺍﻟﻬﯾﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﯾﺑﯾﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﻭل ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻭﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻟﻔﻅﹰﺎ ﻣﺭﻛﺑﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﺍﻟﻬﯾﺋﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺩ) (65ﻋﺭﻓﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ "ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﺎ ﺷﺧﺻﯾﺎ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻣﺭﻛﺏ ،ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺳﻡ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ
ﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ" ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﻭل ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻓﻘﺩ ﻭﻗﻔﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺧﹾﻁﺊ ﻻ ﯾﻭﺟﺩ ﺇﻻ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﯾﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺳل
ﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﻣﺧﹾﻁِﺊ ،ﻧﻌﻡ ﻟﻡ ﯾﺻِﺏ"ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ"[) (66ﻓﻲ ﺯﻋﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻠﺏ) (51ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻛﻧﺎﯾﺔ.
ﺍﻧﺣﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﯾﺔ ﻟﻣﺎ ﻋﺭﻓﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻟﺙ :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻟﻔﻅﹰﺎ ﻣﻔﺭﺩﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺳل ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻠﺏ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻛﻧﺎﯾﺔ ﺃﯾﺿﺎ ﻣﻧﻪ. ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﺎ ﻧﻭﻋﯾﺎ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺑﻧﺎﺀ ﻗﺎل "ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺯﻭﻗﻲ"
)(67
ﻭﻛﺫﺍ ﻟﻡ ﯾﺻِﺏ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻭﻟﻪ":ﻭﻗﺩ ﯾﺳﻣﻰ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﻣﻁﻠﻘﹰﺎ" ﻷﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺷﺭﺡ) (52ﺍﻟﺣﻣﺎﺳﺔ:
ﺍﻟﻣﺳﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﻣﻁﻠﻘﹰﺎ ]ﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﻲ ﻻ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ[)،(68 ...................... )(53
ﻭﺃﺑﻐﹶﺽ ﺇﻟﻲ ﺑﺈﺗﯾﺎﻧﻬﺎ
ﻓﺈﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺳﻣﺎﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺑﯾل ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﻣﻁﻠﻘﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻗﻭل)" (69ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ" ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻧﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻥ ﺃﺻل "ﺑﺄﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺗﻌﯾﺭ ﻓﯾﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺭ ﻟﻠﺧﺑﺭ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻌﻧﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺟﺏ،ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻌﺟﺏ
ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ" :ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﻣﺗﻰ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻭﺻﻔﹰﺎ ﻏﯾﺭ ﺧﺑﺭ ،ﻭﻫﻡ) (54ﯾﺳﺗﻌﯾﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻟﻠﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻣﺎ ﯾﺳﺗﻌﯾﺭﻭﻥ
ﺣﻘﯾﻘﻲ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻧﺗﺯﻋﺎ ﻣﻥ ﻋﺩﺓ ﺃﻣﻭﺭ ﺧﺹ ﺑﺎﺳﻡ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﻛﺎﻟﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﺟﻣل ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ،ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﻛﻣﺎ ﯾﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﻧﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺧﺑﺭ ﻟﻸﻣﺭ ﻛﻘﻭﻟﻪ
)(55
ﻓﻲ ﻗﻭﻟﻪ):(70 ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ﴿:ﻭﺍﻟﹾﻣﻁﹶﻠﻘﹶﺎﺕﹸ ﯾﺗﹶﺭﺑﱠﺻﻥ ﺑِﺄَﻧﹾ ﹸﻔﺳِﻬِﻥﱠ ﺛﹶﻼﺛﹶﺔﹶ ﻗﹸﺭﻭﺀٍ﴾
ﺩِ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺻﺑﺭﻙ ﻗﹶﺎﺗِﻠﹸﻪ ﻭﺍﺻﺑِﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺿﺽِ ﺍﻟﺣﺳﻭ ﺍﻵﯾﺔ") .(56ﺍﻧﺗﻬﻰ) .(57ﻭﺍﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺻﯾﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻠﻣﺳﺗﻘﺑل
ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻌﻛﺱ ﺃﯾﺿﺎﹰ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺳﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ.
)(71
ﺇﻥ ﻟﹶﻡ ﺗﹶﺟِﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺗﹶﺄﻛﹸﻠﹸﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﻧ ـ ـﺎﺭِ ﺗﹶ ـﺄﻛﹸلُ ﻧﹶﻔﺳ ـﻬ ـﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺍﺑﻊ :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻟﻔﻅﺎﹰ ﻣﺭﻛﺑﺎﹰ ,ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻣﺎ
ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﺎﹰ ﻧﻭﻋﯾﺎﹰ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ ﺍﻟﻬﯾﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﯾﺑﯾﺔ ﻛﻘﻭﻟﻪ
ﻭﻗﻭﻟﻪ) (72ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﯾﺔ ،ﺑﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﺑﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ)﴿ :(58ﻗﹶﺎﻟﹶﺕﹾ ﺭﺏِّ ﺇِﻧِّﻲ ﻭﺿﻌﺗﹸﻬﺎ ﺃُﻧﹾﺛﹶﻰ﴾) (59ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﯾﺋﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ
ﺫﻛﺭﻩ ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ" :ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻧﺳﻣﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺟﻣﻠﺔ ﻣﻭﺿﻭﻋﺔ ﻟﻺﺧﺑﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻗﺩ ﺍﺳﺗﻌﯾﺭﺕ ﻹﻧﺷﺎﺀ) (60ﺇﻅﻬﺎﺭ
ﺳﺑﯾل ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ") (73ﺻﺭﯾﺢ ﻓﯾﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺭﻧﺎ. ﺍﻟﺗﺣﺯﻥ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻧﻬﻣﺎ :ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﺻﺭﯾﺣﯾﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻣﺎ ﻗﯾﺩﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻭﯾﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ "ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﺎﻑ"ﺣﯾﺙ ﻗﺎل ﻓﻲ ﺗﻔﺳﯾﺭ ﻗﻭﻟﻪ
ﺑﺎﻟﺗﺻﺭﯾﺣﯾﺔ ﺍﺣﺗﺭﺍﺯﺍ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﻛﻧﯾﺔ ،ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﻟﯾﺳﺕ ﻣﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ﴿ :ﻣﺛﹶﻠﹸﻬﻡ ﻛﹶﻣﺛﹶلِ ﺍﻟﺫِﻱ ﺍﺳﺗﹶﻭﻗﹶﺩ ﻧﹶﺎﺭﺍ﴾) (74ﺍﻵﯾﺔ .ﺑﻌﺩ
ﺃﻗﺳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺫﻫﺏ ﺇﻟﯾﻪ ﻭﻫﻡ"ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ" (88ﻭﻣﻥ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻘﻪ":ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺛﺎﻟﯾﻥ ﻛﻠﯾﻬﻣﺎ ﻣﻥ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﻗﻠﹼﺩﻩ) ،(89ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻘﻘﻧﺎﻩ ﻓﻲ "ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺗﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻣﻭﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ،ﻭﺍﻟﺻﺣﯾﺢ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻋﻠﯾﻬﻌﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺎﻥ ﻻ ﯾﺗﺧﻁﹼﻭﻧﻪ :ﺇﻥ
ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ").(90 ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﯾﻥ ﺟﻣﯾﻌﺎ ﻣﻥ ﺟﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﻛﺑ ـﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻟﺙ ﻣﻧﻬﺎ :ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﻬﻛﻣﯾﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺑﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻧﺯﯾل ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺭﺩﺓ").(75
ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺑﺎﯾﻧﺔ ﻣﻧﺯﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﺑﻬﺔ. ﻭﻗﺎل ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﻓﻲ ﺁﺧﺭ ﺑﺣﺙ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﻲ" :ﺛﻡ
ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺍﺑﻊ ﻣﻧﻪ :ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺳل. ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﻲ ﻣﺗﻰ ﻓﹶﺷﹶﻰ ﺍﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺑﯾل ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ
ﻭﺍﻟﺧﺎﻣﺱ :ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ ) ،(91ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺑﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﯾﻘﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭ ﻻ ﻏﯾﺭ ﯾﺳﻣﻰ) (76ﻣﺛﻼﹰ").(77
ﻟﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺻﺣﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﻧﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺩ ﻣﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺗﻌﻣﯾﻡ، ﻭﻛﺎﻥ "ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ"ﻟﻡ ﯾﻔﹼﺭﻕ ﺑﯾﻥ ﻋﺑﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل
ﻭﻗﺩ ﻏﹶﻔِل ﻋﻧﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﻭﻣﻘﻠﹼﺩﻭﻩ ﻟﯾﻧﺗﻅﻡ ﻗﻭﻟﻪ : ﻭﻋﺑﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﺛل ﻓﻘﺎل" :ﻭﻗﺩ ﯾﺳﻣﻰ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾل") (78ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻪ ﯾﻘﻭل:
))ﻭﻛﺫﺏ ﺑﻁﻥ ﺃﺧﯾﻙ(() .(92ﻗﺎل "ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﻑ"" :(93ﻗﻭﻟﻪ ﻭﻗﺩ ﯾﺳﻣﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺛل.
])) :ﻓﻘﺩ[ ) (94ﺻﺩﻕﹶ ﺍﷲُ ﻭﻛﺫﺏ ﺑﻁﻥ ﺃﺧﯾﻙ(( ﻣﻥ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺣﻁﺕ ﺑﻣﺎ ﺗﻠﻭﻧﺎﻩ ﻓﻘﺩ ﻭﻗﻔﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ
ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ ،ﻭ ﻟﻬﺫﺍ ﺃﺣﺳﻥ ﻣﻭﻗﻌﻪ ﺟﺩﺍ") ،(95ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻧﻭﻉ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺻﻭﺭ ،ﺣﯾﺙ ﻟﻡ ُﯾﺫﻛﺭ ﻓﯾﻪ
ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ ﯾﺷﺑﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﻠﯾﺣﯾﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻣﻥ ﻗﺑﯾل ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻟﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺍﺑﻊ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻗﺳﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺑل ﺃُﺩﺭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭل ﻣﻧﻬﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻭﻉ
ﺍﻟﺗﻬﻛﻣﯾﺔ .ﺇﻧﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﻕ ﺑﯾﻧﻬﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺻﺩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺳﺧﺭﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﯾﺔ ﺇﺧﺭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻛﻼﻡ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺗﺿﻰ ﺍﻟﻅﺎﻫﺭ ،ﻭﺫﹸﻛﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺁﺧﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻭﻥ
ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ،ﻣﻥ ﺣﯾﺙ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻣﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻧﺯﯾل ﺻﺣﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻁﻠﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺟﻣﺎل ،ﻗﺎل ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ" :ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻁﻠﺏ
ﺍﻟﺿﺩ ﻣﻧﺯﻟﺔ ﺻﺣﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺷﻛل ،ﻭﻣﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺛﯾﺭ ﻣﺎ ﯾﺧﺭﺝ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺗﺿﻰ ﺍﻟﻅﺎﻫﺭ ،ﻭﻛﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﺧﺑﺭ ﻓﯾﺫﻛﺭ
ﺗﻧﺯﯾل ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺿﺎﺩ ﻣﻧﺯﻟﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻧﺎﺳﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺷﺎﺑﻪ. ﺃﺣﺩﻫﻣﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺭ") .(79ﺛﻡ ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﺃﻣﺛﻠﺔ ﻣﺭﺟﻌﻬﺎ ﺇﻟﻰ
ﻭﻣﻥ ﺭﺍﻡ ﺯﯾﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻓﻠﯾﻧﻅﺭ "ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺗﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺑﻧﺎﺀ) ،(81)"(80ﻭﻋﺑﺭ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺗﻭﻟﹼﺩ ﻋﻥ ﺃﻧﻭﺍﻉ
ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻣﻭﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ "ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ) (96ﻓﻲ ﺳﻠﻙ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﺎﻟﻌﺔ") (97ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺩﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻁﻠﺏ،ﺣﯾﺙ ﻗﺎل ﺑﻌﺩ ﺗﻔﺳﯾﺭﻩ ﻭﺑﯾﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﺳﺎﻣﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﺳﺎﻡ
ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﻲ ﻣﺗﻌﺫﹼﺭﺍ ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺧﻣﺳﺔ" :ﻓﺑﺎﻟﺣﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﯾﺑﯾﻥ ﻛﯾﻑ ﯾﺗﻔﺭﻉ ﻋﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻷﺑﻭﺍﺏ
ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﻲ ﺩﺍﺧﻼﹰ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯﻱ ﺃﻭﻻ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻭل ﺍﻟﺧﻣﺳﺔ) :(82ﺍﻟﺗﻣﻧﹼﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻔﻬﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻧﻬﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻧﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﻣﺎ
ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺩﺧﻭﻟﻪ ﻓﯾﻪ ﺩﺧﻭل ﺍﻟﺟﺯﺋﻲ ﺗﺣﺕ ﺍﻟﻛﻠﻲ، ﯾﺗﻔﺭﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺑﯾل ﺍﻟﺟﻣﻠﺔ") (83ﺛﻡ ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﺃﻣﺛﻠﺔ ﻣﺭﺟﻌﻬﺎ ﺇﻟﻰ
]ﻭﺩﺧﻭل ﺍﻟﺟﺯﺋﻲ ﺗﺣﺕ ﺍﻟﻛﻠﻲ[) ،(98ﻭﺍﻷﻭل ﻣﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﺳﺎﻡ: ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻬﯾﺋﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﺭﻛﯾﺑﯾﺔ).(84
ﺍﻟﺗﺿﻣﯾﻥ ،ﻭﺗﻔﺻﯾل ﺍﻟﻛﻼﻡ ﻓﯾﻪ ﯾﺭﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﻫﺎﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﺛﻡ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻟﻠﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺁﺧﺭ ﺗﻔﺭﺩﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺃﯾﺿﺎ :ﻭﻫﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ
ﻋﻣﻠﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻘﻪ) ،(99ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻣﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ،ﻭﺗﻔﺻﯾﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯﻱ ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ]ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﻣﻌﻧﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﻲ ﻣﺗﻌﺫﹼﺭﺍ ﺃﻭﻻ،
ﯾﻁﻠﺏ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﻭﺍﺷﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻋﻠﹼﻘﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ "ﺍﻟﺗﻠﻭﯾﺢ") ،(100ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻟﺙ: ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻭل ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ[) (85ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ
ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻻ ﺩﺧﻭل ﻓﯾﻪ ﻟﻠﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺣﺣﺔ ﻟﻼﻧﺗﻘﺎل) (86ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل
ﺃﺻﻼﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻧﻭﻉ ﺩﺧل ﻓﻲ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻛﻧﺎﯾﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺑﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﺑﻬﺔ ﺑﯾﻧﻬﻣﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻏﯾﺭﻫﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻭل ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺻﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺟﻣﻠﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻛﻭﻥ ]ﺗﻠﻙ[) (87ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻘﯾﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻧﺯﯾﻠﯾﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺩﯾﺭ
ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﻲ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺧﺎﺭﺝ ،ﻟﻼﻧﺗﻘﺎل ﻣﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻭﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻘﯾﻪ ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﻟﻔﻅ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺑﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺩﺍ ﻛﺄﻥ
ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺍﺩ .ﻓﺎﻓﻬﻡ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺳﺑﯾل ﺍﻟﺭﺷﺎﺩ. ﺃﻭ ﻣﺗﻌﺩﺩﺍ ﻣﻧﻘﻭﻻ ًﻋﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻭﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﻣﻧﻘﻭﻻﹰ
)(102
ﺍﺧﺗﺭﻋﻧﺎﻩ ﺃﯾﺿﺎ ]ﻭﻟﻠﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺑﻭﺟﻪ) (101ﺁﺧﺭ[ ﻋﻧﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻛﻭﻥ ﺗﻠﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﻌﻧﻭﯾﺔ
ﻭﻫﻭ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﺍﻋﺗﺑﺭ ﻓﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻻ ﯾﺧﻠﻭ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻥ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺃﺻﻠﯾﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻔﻅﯾﺔ ﻣﺧﺗﺭﻋﺔ.
ﻣﻧﻘﻭﻻ ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﻣﻧﻘﻭﻻ ﻋﻧﻪ ،ﺑل ﺛﺎﺑﺗﹰﺎ ﻓﯾﻪ ﻭﺍﻷﻭل ﻣﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﺳﺎﻡ :ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺑﻠﯾﻎ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﻘﺳﻡ ﺑﺣﺳﺏ
ﻣﺗﻘﺭﺭﺍ: ﺍﻟﻭﺣﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻟﻔﻅ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺑﻪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻌﺩﺩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﻠﺗﺑﺱ
ﻭﺍﻷﻭل :ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻲ ﯾﻧﺗﻅﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﺳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﺻﺭﯾﺣﯾﺔ ﻭﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﻲ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻟﻔﻅ ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﻣﺎﺭ ﺫﻛﺭﻩ ﺁﻧﻔﹰﺎ ،ﺧﻼ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﯾﻬﺎ ﺧﻼﻓﹰﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﻋﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻲ ﻛل ﻭﺍﺣﺩ ﻣﻥ ﻫﺫﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻬﯾﻥ ﻣﻧﻘﻭل ﻋﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻫﺏ ﺍﻷﻛﺛﺭﻭﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻧﻘﻭﻟﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ، ﻣﺎ ﺣﻘﹼﻘﻧﺎﻩ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻭﺿﻌﻪ.
"ﺃﻧﺑﺕﹶ ﺍﻟﺭﺑﯾﻊ ﺍﻟﺑﻘلَ" ،ﻓﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ]ﻓﯾﻧﺗﻅﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﯾﺿﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺳﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺑﺎﻗﻭﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻏﯾﺭ ﻣﻧﻘﻭﻟﺔ
ﻓﯾﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻧﺎﺩ ﻻ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻅ ﻧﻔﺳﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻌﻧﺎﻩ. ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ[) (103ﻭﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣﻠﺔ ﻓﯾﻣﺎ ﻻ ﯾﺻﺩﻕ
ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻛﺎﻓﯾﺔ ﻟﺣﺳﻧﻪ ،ﺗﺷﺗﻣل ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻔﺱ ﺍﻷﻣﺭ،ﻛﺎﻟﻠﻔﻅ ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣل
ﺃﻧﻭﺍﻋﻪ ﻭﺗﺗﻧﺎﻭل ﺃﻓﺭﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻭﺭﺑﻣﺎ ﯾﺷﺗﻣل ﺑﻌﺿﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﺃﺧﺭﻯ ﻏﻠﻁﹰﺎ ﻓﯾﻣﺎ ﻻ ﯾﺻﺩﻕ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﻬﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ،ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻔﺻﯾل ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺑﻊ
ﻓﯾﺯﺩﺍﺩ ﺣﺳﻧﻪ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺗﻲ ﻻ ﯾﺧﺗﻠﻑ ﻋﻥ ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﯾﻁﻠﺏ ﻣﻥ ﺑﻌﺽ ﺗﻌﻠﯾﻘﺎﺗﻧﺎ).(104
ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﻥ :ﻓﺯﯾﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﻘﺭﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﻓﻲ ﺫﻫﻥ ﺍﻟﺳﺎﻣﻊ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺇﻧﻣﺎ ﻭﺻﻔﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻭﻱ ﻛﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻣﻁﻠﻘﹰﺎ ﯾﺣﺗﺎﺝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻭﺻﻭل ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺍﺩ ﻣﻧﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﻏﯾﺭﻧﺎ – ﻟﻌﺩﻡ ]ﺻﺩﻗﻪ[) (105ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﻓﻲ
ﻣﻼﺣﻅﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﺣﻘﯾﻘﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﯾﻧﻪ ﻭﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺷﺭﻋﻲ ﺑﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻌﻲ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻁﻼﻗﻪ ﯾﻧﺗﻅﻡ
ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺭﯾﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺣﺎﻟﯾﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺎﻟﯾﺔ ،ﻭﻛﻠﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺕ ﺍﻟﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺷﺭﻋﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻥ ﻋﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ
ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺗﻌﻣل ﺃﻛﺛﺭ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺄﻣل ﺃﻭﻓﺭ ،ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺗﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﻗﻭﻯ ﻭﺃﺷﺩ، ﯾﺿﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﻭﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺛﻼﺛﺔ ،ﺛﻡ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﻋﻧﺩ ﺍﻟﺗﻘﺳﯾﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﻭﻱ ﻟﻡ ﯾﻛﻥ
ﻭﺗﻘﺭﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺍﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺫﻫﻥ ﺃﺯﯾﺩ. ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺻﯾﺭﺓ).(106
ﻭﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﻟﻐﻔﻭﻟﻪ ﻋﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻗﹼﺳﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ :ﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻋﻘﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻹﻗﺑﺎل ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺑﺎﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻭل
ﺍﻟﻣﺗﺿﻣﱢﻥ ﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﻋﻧﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺯﻋﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺿﻭﻉ ﻟﻠﻣﻘﹼﯾﺩ "ﺍﻟﺧﻧﺳﺎﺀ):"(107
ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﻁﻠﻕ ﻛﺎﻟﻣِﺷﻔﹶﺭ) (114ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺿﻭﻉ ﻟﻠﺷﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﯾﻅﺔ، ﻓﺈﻧﻣﺎ ﻫﻬﻲ ﺇﻗﹾﺑﺎلٌ ﻭﺇﺩﺑ ـﺎﺭ ......................
ﺍﻟﻣﺳﺗﻌﻣل ﻓﻲ ﻣﻁﻠﻕ ﺍﻟﺷﻔﺔ ﻣﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺑﯾل ،ﺣﺗﻰ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ
ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﻛﺎﺳﺗﻌﻣﺎل ﺃﺣﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺗﺭﺍﺩﻓﯾﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻗﺎل ﺍﻟﺷﯾﺦ) (108ﻓﻲ "ﺩﻻﺋل ﺍﻹﻋﺟﺎﺯ" :ﻟﻡ ﯾﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻹﻗﺑﺎل
ﺍﻟﺗﺿﻣﻥ ﻟﻔﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﺯﺍﺋﺩﺓ) ،(115ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺟﺏ ﺃﻧﻬﻡ ﯾﺟﻌﻠﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺻﺭﻑ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺑﺎﺭ ﻏﯾﺭﻣﻌﻧﺎﻫﻣﺎ) (109ﺣﺗﻰ ﯾﻛﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻛﻠﻣﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻣﺎ
ﻭﺍﻻﻓﺗﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺟﻭﻩ ﺍﻟﻛﻼﻡ ﻭﺇﻅﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺩﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ﻓﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺟﻌﻠﺗﻬﺎ ﻟﻛﺛﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﯾﻘﺑل ﻭﯾﺩﺑﺭ ،ﻛﺄﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺟﺳﻣﺕ
ﻷﻧﻭﺍﻉ ﺍﻻﻟﺗﻔﺎﺕ ﻭﺇﻓﺭﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﺗﻭﺟﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺇﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ]ﻣﻥ ﺍﻹﻗﺑﺎل ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺑﺎﺭ[) ،(110ﻭﻟﯾﺱ ﺃﯾﺿﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺫﻑ ﺍﻟﻣﺿﺎﻑ
ﺃﯾﺿﺎ ،ﻓﻛﯾﻑ ﻻ ﯾﺟﻌﻠﻭﻧﻪ ﻣﻥ ﻓﻭﺍﺋﺩﻩ؟ ﻭﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺿﺎﻑ ﺇﻟﯾﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻭﺍ ﯾﺫﻛﺭﻭﻧﻪ ﻣﻧﻪ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻭ
ﺛﻡ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺯﻋﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻣﺗﺿﻣﱢﻥ ﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﻗﻠﻧﺎ :ﺃُﺭﯾﺩ ﺇﻧﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺇﻗﺑﺎل ﻭﺇﺩﺑﺎﺭ ،ﺃﻓﺳﺩﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺷﻌﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ
)(111
ﻗﺳﻣﺎﻥ :ﺧﺎلٍ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺗﺿﻣﻥ ﺑﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻧﻔﺳﻧﺎ ،ﻭﺧﺭﺟﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻐﺳﻭل ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﻋﺎﻣﻲ ،ﻣﺭﺩﻭﺩ
ﺑﺎﻷﻭل :ﻣﺎ ﻋﺩﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺳﻡ ﺍﻟﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺯﻋﻣﻪ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻻ ﻣﺳﺎﻍ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻧﺩ ﻣﻥ ﻫﻭ ﺻﺣﯾﺢ ﺍﻟﺫﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﻧﺳﺎﺑﺔ
ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺳل ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺛﺎﻧﻲ :ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ) ،(116ﻭﻫﺫﻩ ﻛﺎﻟﺗﺻﺭﯾﺢ ﻣﻧﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻟﻠﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲ").(112
ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺑﺟﻣﯾﻊ ﻣﺭﺍﺗﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻥ ﺣﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ،ﻭﻗﺩ ﻗﺎل ﻓﻲ ﻭﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺗﻘﺩﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺿﺎﻑ ﻓﯾﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻛﻼﻡ ﻗﺩ ﺟِﻲﺀ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻭﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺭ ﻣﻥ ﻛﺗﺎﺑﻪ" :ﺇﻥ ﺃﻧﺻﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻡ ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺎﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺗﻌﺭﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻅﺎﻫﺭﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻡ ﯾﻘﺻﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭﺓ ﻟﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻪ ﺃﻥ ﯾﺟﺎﺀ
ﻟﻠﻣﺟﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﻛﻧﺎﯾﺔ") (117ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻭل ﻣﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺯﻋﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ ﺑﻠﻔﻅ ﺍﻟﺫﺍﺕ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﺭﺍﺩ ،ﻭﻗﺎل ﺳﯾﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺣﻘﻘﯾﻥ ﻓﯾﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﹼﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺇﺧﺭﺍﺝ ﻣﻧﻪ ﻣﺑﺎﺣﺙ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﻋﻥ ﺣﺩ ﻋﻠﻡ ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﹼﺎﻑ" :ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺻﻭﺩ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻭﺻﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﻣﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺷﺄﻥ
ﻗﺻﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﺿﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﻗﺻﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﺎﻉ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺻﻧﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻣﺣﻠﹼّﻬﺎ ﻛﺄﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻋﯾﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﻗﻭﻟﻧﺎ :ﺯﯾﺩ ﻋﺩلٌ،
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭﺿﺣﻧﺎﻩ ﻓﻲ ﻣﻭﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺭ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻥ ﺃﺭﻛﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩل ،ﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﺗﺟﺳﻡ ﻣﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻭﻟﺕ ﺑﻣﻌﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﻡ
ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺛﯾﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﺷﺑﯾﻪ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﯾﺗﺭﻙ ﻓﯾﻪ ﺃﺩﺍﺗﻪ ﻣﻥ ﺃﻗﺳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺟﺎﺯ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋل ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﻣﻘﺻﻭﺩ ،ﻭﻛﺫﺍ ﺇﻥ ﺣﻣﻠﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺫﻑ
ﻣﺎ ﻧﺑﻬﻧﺎﻙ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ﻓﯾﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺩﻡ] .ﺍﻟﺣﻣﺩ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﺎﻡ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺳﻭﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﺿﺎﻑ") ،(113ﻭﻻ ﯾﺫﻫﺏ ﻋﻠﯾﻙ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﺷﯾﺦ ﻓﻲ "ﺍﻹﻗﺑﺎل
ﺃﻓﺿل ﺍﻟﺻﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻛﺭﺍﻡ ﻭﺃﺻﺣﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺑﺎﺭ" ،ﻫﻭ ﺑﻌﯾﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﻭﻥ ﺑﻌﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﻬﻭﻡ
ﺍﻟﻌﻅﺎﻡ[).(118 ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺳﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺛل ﻗﻭﻟﻙ :ﺭﺃﯾﺕﹸ ﺃﺳﺩﺍ،
ﺗﻣﺕ ﺍﻟﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ. ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺟﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﻡ ﯾﺗﺳﻠﹼﻣﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻭل ﺍﻟﻣﺫﻛﻭﺭ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﺷﯾﺦ ﻭﯾﺭﺩﻭﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﯾﻥ ﺑﻌﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻧﻘل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺗﻌﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺗﺟﻭﺯ ﻓﻲ ﻧﺣﻭ:
ﻓﻲ ) ﺏ ( :ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺎﻥ. )(80 ﺍﻟﺷﻌﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺷﻌﺭﺍﺀ ،ﻁ ،1ﺹ ،(236ﻭﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺷﻌﺭ ﺧﻔﺎﻑ ﺑﻥ
ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﺹ .328 -323 )(81 ﻧﺩﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺳﻠﻣﻲ ﺟﻣﻊ ﻭﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻧﻭﺭﻱ ﺣﻣﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﯾﺳﻲ،
ﺍﻟﺧﻣﺳﺔ :ﺳﺎﻗﻁﺔ ﻣﻥ ) ﺃ (. )(82 ﺹ.103
ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﺹ .304 )(83 ﻓﻲ )ﺏ( :ﻭﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺻﻭﺍﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻓﻲ )ﺃ( ﻭ)ﺝ( ،ﺍﻧﻅﺭ: )(54
ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺳﺎﺑﻕ ،ﺹ.306 – 304 )(84 ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺯﻭﻗﻲ ،ﺷﺭﺡ ﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﻣﺎﺳﺔ ،ﻁ ،1ﻡ / 1ﺹ.628
ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻘﻭﻓﯾﻥ ﺳﺎﻗﻁ ﻣﻥ ) ﺝ (. )(85 ﺳﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺑﻘﺭﺓ ﺍﻵﯾﺔ ).(228 )(55
ﻓﻲ ) ﺝ ( :ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺣﺣﺔ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﻘﻼﺏ. )(86 ﺷﺭﺡ ﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﻣﺎﺳﺔ ،ﻡ / 1ﺹ.628 )(56
ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻘﻭﻓﯾﻥ ﺳﺎﻗﻁ ﻣﻥ ) ﺏ(. )(87 ﻓﻲ )ﺏ( ﻭ)ﺝ( ﺍﻧﺗﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ. )(57
ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ :ﺹ .380 - 378 )(88 ﻓﻲ )ﺏ( :ﻛﻘﻭﻟﻬﺎ. )(58
ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ :ﺹ ،160ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻁﻭل :ﺹ – 606 )(89 ﺳﻭﺭﺓ ﺁل ﻋﻣﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻵﯾﺔ ).(36 )(59
.610 ﻓﻲ )ﺏ( :ﻹﻅﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﺯﻥ. )(60
ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﻐﺩﺍﺩﻱ ،ﻫﺩﯾﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﻓﯾﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺳﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻟﻔﯾﻥ ﻭﺁﺛﺎﺭ )(90 ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺯﻭﯾﻧﻲ ،ﺹ .159 )(61
ﺍﻟﻣﺻﻧﻔﯾﻥ ،ﺝ/1ﺹ.141 ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺕ ﻟﺟﻌﻔﺭ ﺑﻥ ﻋﻠﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺣﺎﺭﺛﻲ ،ﻭﺗﻣﺎﻣﻪ: )(62
ﺍﻟﻣﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ ﻋﻧﺩ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﯾﯾﻥ ﻣﺻﻁﻠﺢ ﺑﺩﯾﻌﻲ. )(91 ﺟِﻧﯾﺏ ﻭﺟﺛﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻣﻛﹼﺔﹶ ﻣﻭﺛﹶﻕﹸ
ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﺧﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺻﺣﯾﺢ ﺍﻟﺑﺧﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻁ ،1ﺝ ،3ﺹ ،1305 )(92 ﺍﻧﻅﺭ :ﺍﻷﻏﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺝ ،13ﺹ 54ﻭﻣﻌﺟﻡ ﺍﻟﺑﻠﺩﺍﻥ) ،ﺣﺫﻭﺭﺍﺀ(،
)ﺑﺎﺏ ﺩﻭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻣﺑﻁﻭﻥ( ،ﻭﻧﺹ ﺍﻟﺣﺩﯾﺙ "ﺣﺩﺛﻧﺎ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻭﻓﻲ ﻣﻭﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺭ )ﺟﺩﻭﺭﺓ( ،ﻭ ﻣﺭﺍﺻﺩ ﺍﻻﻁﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﻣﺎﺀ
ﺟﻌﻔﺭ ،ﺣﺩﺛﻧﺎ ﺷﻌﺑﺔ ﻋﻥ ﻗﺗﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻥ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﻣﺗﻭﻛل ﻋﻥ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺍﻷﻣﻛﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺑﻘﺎﻉ) ،ﺣﺫﻭﺭﺍﺀ( ،ﻭﻓﻲ ﻣﻭﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺭ )ﺟﺩﻭﺭﺓ(،
ﺳﻌﯾﺩ ،ﻗﺎل :ﺟﺎﺀ ﺭﺟل ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻧﺑﻲ – ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻡ – ﻭﻋﻼﻭﻧﻪ ،ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺷﻌﺭﺍﺀ ﻣﻘﻠﻭﻥ ،ﻁ ،1ﺹ.150
ﻓﻘﺎل :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺧﻲ ﺍﺳﺗﻁﻠﻕ ﺑﻁﻧﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎل" :ﺍﺳﻘﻪ ﻋﺳﻼﹰ" ﻓﺳﻘﺎﻩ، ﻓﻲ )ﺏ( :ﻫﻭﺍﻱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺭﻛﺏ ﺍﻟﯾﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺻﻌِﺩ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻓﻲ )(63
ﻓﻘﺎل :ﺇﻧﻲ ﺳﻘﯾﺗﻪ ﻓﻠﻡ ﯾﺯﺩﻩ ﺇﻻ ﺍﺳﺗﻁﻼﻗﹰﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺎل" :ﺻﺩﻕ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺎﺩﺭ" :ﻫﻭﺍﻱَ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺭﱠﻛﺏِ ﺍﻟﯾﻣﺎﻧﯾﻥ ﻣﺻﻌِﺩّ" ﺍﻧﻅﺭ:
ﻭﻛﺫﺏ ﺑﻁﻥ ﺃﺧﯾﻙ". ﺍﻹﺻﻔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺍﻷﻏﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺏ .ﻁ ،ﺝ ،13ﺹ .54ﺍﻟﺣﻣﻭﻱ،
ﻫﻭ ﻋﻣﺭ ﺑﻥ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺣﻣﻥ ﺑﻥ ﻋﻣﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﻬﺑﻬﺎﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻛﻧﺎﻧﻲ )(93 ﻣﻌﺟﻡ ﺍﻟﺑﻠﺩﺍﻥ) ،ﺣﺫﻭﺭﺍﺀ( ،ﻭﻓﻲ ﻣﻭﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺭ )ﺟﺩﻭﺭﺓ(،
ﺍﻟﻘﺯﻭﯾﻧﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺳﻲ ،ﻣﺎﺕ ﺷﺎﺑﺎ ،ﻋﻥ 37ﺃﻭ 38ﻋﺎﻣﺎ ،ﻟﻪ ﻭﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺣﻕ ،ﻣﺭﺍﺻﺩ ﺍﻻﻁﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻣﻛﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺑﻘﺎﻉ،
"ﺍﻟﻛﺷﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﺎﻑ" ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺳﯾﺭ ،ﺣﺎﺷﯾﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺷﺎﻑ ﻁ) ،1ﺣﺫﻭﺭﺍﺀ( ،ﻭﻓﻲ ﻣﻭﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺭ )ﺟﺩﻭﺭﺓ(.
ﺍﻟﺯﻣﺧﺷﺭﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻭ ﻣﺧﻁﻭﻁ .ﺍﻧﻅﺭ :ﺷﺫﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺫﻫﺏ ﺝ/6 ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻣﻁﻭل ﺷﺭﺡ ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﻁ،1 )(64
ﺹ ،143ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻼﻡ ﺝ/5ﺹ .208 ﺹ.605 ،604
ﻓﻲ )ﺝ( :ﻓﻘﻁ. )(94 ﻭﻗﺩ :ﺳﺎﻗﻁﺔ ﻣﻥ )ﺏ(. )(65
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺳﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻛﺷﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻛﺷﺎﻑ) ،ﻣﺧﻁﻭﻁ( ﻭﺭﻗﺔ )،(251 )(95 ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻘﻭﻓﯾﻥ ﺳﺎﻗﻁ ﻣﻥ )ﺏ(. )(66
ﻧﻘﻼﹰ ﻋﻥ :ﺍﻟﺭﺷﯾﺩ ،ﻧﺎﺻﺭ ﺳﻌﺩ ،1980 ،ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل، ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ.159 : )(67
ﺍﻟﻧﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻷﺩﺑﻲ ،ﺍﻟﺭﯾﺎﺽ ،ﺹ.74 ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻘﻭﻓﯾﻥ ﺳﺎﻗﻁ ﻣﻥ )ﺏ(. )(68
ﻓﻲ )ﺏ( :ﺍﻟﺷﻛﻠﺔ. )(96 ﺍﻟﻌﻁﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻭﻟﻪ :ﺭﺩ ﻗﻭل ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣﻘﺻﻭﺩ )(69
ﺣﻘﻘﻬﺎ :ﻧﺎﺻﺭ ﺳﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺷﯾﺩ ،ﻭﻧﺷﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻧﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻷﺩﺑﻲ ،ﺑﻌﻧﻭﺍﻥ: )(97 )ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ(.
"ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ﺑﺎﺷﺎ". ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺗﺎﻥ ﻟﻌﺑﺩ ﺍﷲ ﺍﺑﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺗﺯ ،ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺩﯾﻭﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻁ ،1ﺹ.579 )(70
ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻘﻭﻓﯾﻥ ﺳﺎﻗﻁ ﻣﻥ ) ﺃ (. )(98 ﻭﻗﻭﻟﻪ :ﻣﺿﺽ ،ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ :ﺣﺳﺩ ،ﻭﻧﻔﺳﻬﺎ :ﺑﻌﺿﻬﺎ.
ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﺍﻟﺗﺿﻣﯾﻥ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺧﻁﻭﻁﺔ ﻣﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺳﺧﺔ )(99 ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﺹ.364 )(71
ﺑﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺭﯾﺔ ،ﺑﺭﻗﻡ ) (389ﻣﺟﺎﻣﯾﻊ. ﺍﻟﺿﻣﯾﺭ ﻓﻲ)ﻗﻭﻟﻪ( ﯾﻌﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ )ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ(. )(72
ﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺗﻠﻭﯾﺢ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻛﺷﻑ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻕ ﺍﻟﺗﻧﻘﯾﺢ ،ﻟﺳﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻣﺳﻌﻭﺩ )(100 ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ.159 : )(73
ﺑﻥ ﻋﻣﺭ ﺑﻥ ﻋﺑﺩﺍﷲ ﻟﻠﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻭ ﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺻﻭل، ﺳﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺑﻘﺭﺓ:ﺍﻵﯾﺔ ) .( 17 )(74
ﻣﻁﺑﻭﻉ ﻣﺗﺩﺍﻭل. ﺍﻟﺯﻣﺧﺷﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﻛﺷﺎﻑ ﻋﻥ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻕ ﻏﻭﺍﻣﺽ ﺍﻟﺗﻧﺯﯾل ﻭﻋﯾﻭﻥ )(75
ﺑﻭﺟﻪ :ﺳﺎﻗﻁﺔ ﻣﻥ )ﺃ(. )(101 ﺍﻷﻗﺎﻭﯾل ﻓﻲ ﻭﺟﻭﻩ ﺍﻟﺗﺄﻭﯾل ،ﻁ ،1ﺝ /1ﺹ .200
ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻘﻭﻓﯾﻥ ﻣﻁﻣﻭﺱ ﻓﻲ ) ﺝ (. )(102 ﻓﻲ ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ :ﺳﻣﻲ ،ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺹ.349 )(76
ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻘﻭﻓﯾﻥ ﺳﺎﻗﻁ ﻣﻥ ) ﺃ (. )(103 ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺳﻛﹼﺎﻛﻲ ،ﺹ .346 )(77
ﻟﻡ ﺃﻫﺗﺩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻣﻭﻁﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺗﻌﻠﯾﻘﺎﺕ. )(104 ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ.159 : )(78
ﻓﻲ ) ﺝ ( :ﻟﻌﺩﻡ ﺷﻣﻭﻟﻪ . )(105 ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﺹ .323 )(79
ﺹ.302-300 ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻧﺎﺳﺦ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺏ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ. )(106
ﻟﻡ ﺃﻫﺗﺩ ﺇﻟﯾﻪ. )(113 ﻫﺫﺍ ﻋﺟﺯ ﺍﻟﺑﯾﺕ ﻭﺻﺩﺭﻩ: )(107
"ﺍﻟﻣِﺷﹾﻔﹶﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺷﹾﻔﹶﺭ ﻟﻠﺑﻌﯾﺭ ﻛﺎﻟﺷﻔﺔ ﻟﻺﻧﺳﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻣِﺷﹾﻔﹶﺭ ﻣﻥ )(114 ﺗﹶﺭﺗﻊ ﺣﺗﻰ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺩﻛﺭﺕﹾ
ﺍﻟﺑﻌﯾﺭ ﻛﺎﻟﺟﺣﻔﹶﻠﹶﺔِ ﻣﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺱ" ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﻟﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺏ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺍﻟﺧﻧﺳﺎﺀ ،ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ ،ﺹ.48
ﺍﻟﺷﯾﻥ ،ﺷﹶﻔﹶﺭ. ﺍﻟﺷﯾﺦ ﻫﻭ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﺭﺟﺎﻧﻲ. )(108
ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ :ﺹ 362ﻭ.364 )(115 ﻓﻲ ) ﺏ ( :ﻣﻌﻧﺎﻫﻣﺎ. )(109
ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺳﺎﺑﻕ :ﺹ .400 – 362 )(116 ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻘﻭﻓﯾﻥ ﺳﺎﻗﻁ ﻣﻥ ) ﺏ(. )(110
ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺳﺎﺑﻕ :ﺹ .330 )(117 ﻓﻲ ) ﺏ ( :ﻣﺭﺫﻭل. )(111
ﻣﺎ ﺑﯾﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﻘﻭﻓﯾﻥ ﻓﻲ )ﺝ( ﻭﻏﯾﺭ ﻣﻭﺟﻭﺩ ﻓﻲ )ﺃ( ﻭ)ﺏ(. )(118 ﺗﺻﺭﻑ "ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل" ﻓﻲ ﻋﺑﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺟﺭﺟﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺍﻧﻅﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﺭﺟﺎﻧﻲ، )(112
ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺭ ﺑﻥ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺣﻣﻥ ،ﺩﻻﺋل ﺍﻹﻋﺟﺎﺯ ،ﻁ،3
ﺍﻟﺟﺭﺟﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺭ ﺑﻥ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺣﻣﻥ ،ﺃﺳﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺑﻼﻏﺔ ،ﻗﺭﺃﻩ ﻭﻋﻠﹼﻕ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻣﺭﺍﺟﻊ
ﻋﻠﯾﻪ :ﻣﺣﻣﻭﺩ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺷﺎﻛﺭ ،1991 ،ﻁ ،1ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺩﻧﻲ ،ﺟﺩﻩ.
،.........ﺩﻻﺋل ﺍﻹﻋﺟﺎﺯ ،ﻗﺭﺃﻩ ﻭﻋﻠﹼﻕ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ :ﻣﺣﻣﻭﺩ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺷﺎﻛﺭ، ﺍﺑﻥ ﺍﻷﺛﯾﺭ ،ﺿﯾﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻧﺻﺭ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻥ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ،ﺍﻟﻣﺛل ﺍﻟﺳﺎﺋﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺩﺏ
،1992ﻁ ،3ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺩﻧﻲ ،ﺟﺩﺓ. ﺍﻟﻛﺎﺗﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺷﺎﻋﺭ ،1990 ،ﻁ ،1ﺍﻟﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺻﺭﯾﺔ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﺍﻟﺣﻣﻭﻱ ،ﯾﺎﻗﻭﺕ ﺃﺑﻭ ﻋﺑﺩﺍﷲ ﺑﻥ ﻋﺑﺩﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺭﻭﻣﻲ ،ﻣﻌﺟﻡ ﺍﻟﺑﻠﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺏ. ﺍﺑﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻣﺎﺩ ،ﻋﺑﺩﺍﻟﺣﻲ ،1979 ،ﺷﺫﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺫﻫﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺧﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻥ ﺫﻫﺏ،
ﺕ.ﻁ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ. ﻁ ،2ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﯾﺳﺭﺓ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺑﻥ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺗﺯ ،ﺷﺭﺡ ﯾﻭﺳﻑ ﺷﻛﺭﻱ ﻓﺭﺣﺎﺕ ،1995 ،ﻁ ،1ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺑﻥ ﺟﻧﹼﻲ ،ﺃﺑﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﺗﺢ ﻋﺛﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺧﺻﺎﺋﺹ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻧﺟﺎﺭ،
ﺍﻟﺟﯾل ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ. ﺩ.ﺕ ،ﻁ ،2ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻬﺩﻯ ﻟﻠﻁﺑﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻧﺷﺭ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺧﻧﺳﺎﺀ ،1960 ،ﺏ .ﻁ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ. ﺍﺑﻥ ﺭﺷﯾﻕ ،ﺃﺑﻭﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺣﺳﻥ ﺑﻥ ﺭﺷﯾﻕ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻣﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺣﺎﺳﻥ ﺍﻟﺷﻌﺭ
ﺍﻟﺭﺍﺯﻱ ،ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻋﻣﺭ ،ﻧﻬﺎﯾﺔ ﺍﻹﯾﺟﺎﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺩﺭﺍﯾﺔ ﺍﻹﻋﺟﺎﺯ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ: ﻭﻧﻘﺩﻩ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﻣﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺣﻣﯾﺩ ،1981 ،ﻁ ،5ﺩﺍﺭ
ﺇﺑﺭﺍﻫﯾﻡ ﺍﻟﺳﺎﻣﺭﺍﺋﻲ ،1985 ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻛﺭ ،ﻋﻣﺎﻥ. ﺍﻟﺟﯾل ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﺍﻟﺭﺷﯾﺩ ،ﻧﺎﺻﺭ ﺳﻌﺩ ،1980 ،ﺭﺳﺎﺋل ﺍﺑﻥ ﻛﻣﺎل ،ﺍﻟﻧﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻷﺩﺑﻲ، ﺍﺑﻥ ﻗﺗﯾﺑﺔ ،ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻥ ﻣﺳﻠﻡ ،ﺗﺄﻭﯾل ﻣﺷﻛل ﺍﻟﻘﺭﺁﻥ ،ﺷﺭﺣﻪ ﻭﻧﺷﺭﻩ
ﺍﻟﺭﯾﺎﺽ. ﺃﺣﻣﺩ ﺻﻘﺭ ،1981 ،ﻁ ،2ﺍﻟﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﯾﺔ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﺍﻟﺯﺭﻛﻠﻲ ،ﺧﯾﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ،ﺏ .ﺕ ،ﺍﻷﻋﻼﻡ ،ﻁ ،3ﺏ .ﻥ. ،........ﺍﻟﺷﻌﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺷﻌﺭﺍﺀ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻋﻣﺭ ﺍﻟﻁﺑﺎﻉ ،1997 ،ﻁ،1
ﺍﻟﺯﻣﺧﺷﺭﻱ ،ﻣﺣﻣﻭﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻋﻣﺭ ،ﺍﻟﻛﺷﺎﻑ ﻋﻥ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻕ ﻏﻭﺍﻣﺽ ﺍﻟﺗﻧﺯﯾل ﺷﺭﻛﺔ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻷﺭﻗﻡ ﺑﻥ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺍﻷﺭﻗﻡ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﻭﻋﯾﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻗﺎﻭﯾل ﻓﻲ ﻭﺟﻭﻩ ﺍﻟﺗﺄﻭﯾل،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻋﺎﺩل ﺃﺣﻣﺩ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﺑﻥ ﻣﻧﻅﻭﺭ ،ﺃﺑﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﺿل ﺟﻣﺎل ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻣﻛﺭﻡ ،2003 ،ﻟﺳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻣﻭﺟﻭﺩ ﻭﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻌﻭﺽ ،1998 ،ﻁ ،1ﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺑﯾﻛﺎﻥ، ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺏ ،ﻁ ،1ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺣﺩﯾﺙ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺭﺓ.
ﺍﻟﺭﯾﺎﺽ. ﺍﻷﺻﻔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺃﺑﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺝ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﺳﯾﻥ ،ﺍﻷﻏﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ :ﻋﺑﺩ
ﺍﻟﺳﻛﺎﻛﻲ ،ﺃﺑﻭ ﯾﻌﻘﻭﺏ ﯾﻭﺳﻑ ﺑﻥ ﺃﺑﻲ ﺑﻛﺭ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺳﺗﺎﺭ ﺃﺣﻣﺩ ﻓﺭﺍﺝ ،1959 ،ﺏ .ﻁ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺛﻘﺎﻓﺔ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ .
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﺿﺑﻁﻪ ﻭﻛﺗﺏ ﻫﻭﺍﻣﺷﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﹼﻕ ﻋﻠﯾﻪ :ﻧﻌﯾﻡ ﺯﺭﺯﻭﺭ، ﺍﻟﺑﺧﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺃﺑﻭ ﻋﺑﺩﺍﷲ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﺇﺳﻣﺎﻋﯾل ،ﺻﺣﯾﺢ ﺍﻟﺑﺧﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻧﺷﺭﻩ
،1987ﻁ ،2ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﯾﺔ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ. ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺗﺎﻣﺭ ،2004 ،ﻁ ،1ﻣﺅﺳﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺧﺗﺎﺭ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺭﺓ.
ﺍﻟﺳﯾﻭﻁﻲ ،ﺟﻼل ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﺑﻥ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺣﻣﻥ ،ﺑﻐﯾﺔ ﺍﻟﻭﻋﺎﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻁﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺑﻐﺩﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺇﺳﻣﺎﻋﯾل ﺑﻥ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺎ ،ﻫﺩﯾﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﻓﯾﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺳﻣﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻭﯾﯾﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻧﺣﺎﺓ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺃﺑﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﺿل ﺇﺑﺭﺍﻫﯾﻡ ،ﺏ.ﺕ ،ﺏ. ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻟﻔﯾﻥ ﻭﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﺻﻧﻔﯾﻥ ،1951 ،ﺏ .ﻁ ،ﺍﺳﺗﺎﻧﺑﻭل.
ﻁ ،ﺍﻟﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺻﺭﯾﺔ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ. ﺍﻟﺗﻔﺗﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺳﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻣﺳﻌﻭﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻋﻣﺭ ،ﺍﻟﻣﻁﻭل ﺷﺭﺡ ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ
ﺷﻌﺭ ﺧﻔﺎﻑ ﺑﻥ ﻧﺩﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺳﻠﻣﻲ ،ﺟﻣﻊ ﻭﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻧﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﯾﺳﻲ،1967 ، ﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ :ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺣﻣﯾﺩ ﻫﻧﺩﺍﻭﻱ ،2001 ،ﻁ ،1ﺩﺍﺭ
ﺏ .ﻁ ،ﻣﻁﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﺑﻐﺩﺍﺩ. ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﯾﺔ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ .
ﻁﺎﺵ ﻛﺑﺭﻱ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺃﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻣﺻﻁﻔﻰ ،1975 ،ﺍﻟﺷﻘﺎﺋﻕ ﺍﻟﻧﻌﻣﺎﻧﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺗﻣﯾﻣﻲ ،ﺗﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﺑﻥ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﻁﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺳﻧﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ
ﻋﻠﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺛﻣﺎﻧﯾﺔ ،ﺏ.ﻁ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺑﻲ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ. ﺗﺭﺍﺟﻡ ﺍﻟﺣﻧﻔﯾﺔ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻋﺑﺩﺍﻟﻔﺗﺎﺡ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺍﻟﺣﻠﻭ ،1983 ،ﻁ ،1ﺩﺍﺭ
ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺣﻕ ،ﺻﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻣﻥ ،ﻣﺭﺍﺻﺩ ﺍﻻﻁﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺭﻓﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺍﻟﺭﯾﺎﺽ.
ﺍﻷﻣﻛﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺑﻘﺎﻉ ،ﺣﻘﻘﻪ :ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺍﻟﺑﺟﺎﻭﻱ ،1992 ،ﻁ ،1ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﺎﺣﻅ ،ﺃﺑﻭ ﻋﺛﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻥ ﺑﺣﺭ ،ﻛﺗﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺣﯾﻭﺍﻥ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺳﻼﻡ
ﺍﻟﺟﯾل ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ. ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ،1969 ،ﻁ ،3ﺍﻟﻣﺟﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺑﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ،
ﺍﻟﻌﻅﻡ ،ﺟﻣﯾل ﺑﻥ ﻣﺻﻁﻔﻰ ﺑﻥ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ1326 ،ﻫ ،ﻋﻘﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺟﻭﻫﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﻗﺭﺃﻩ ﻭﻛﺗﺏ ﺣﻭﺍﺷﯾﻪ ﻭﻗﺩﻡ ﻟﻪ :ﯾﺎﺳﯾﻥ ﺍﻷﯾﻭﺑﻲ ،2002 ،ﻁ،1 ﺗﺭﺍﺟﻡ ﻣﻥ ﻟﻬﻡ ﺧﻣﺳﻭﻥ ﺗﺻﻧﯾﻔﹰﺎ ﻓﻣﺎﺋﺔ ﻓﺄﻛﺛﺭ ،ﺏ.ﻁ ،ﺍﻟﻣﻁﺑﻌﺔ
ﺍﻟﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺻﺭﯾﺔ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ. ﺍﻷﻫﻠﯾﺔ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﻛﺣﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻋﻣﺭ ﺭﺿﺎ ،ﺏ .ﺕ ،ﻣﻌﺟﻡ ﺍﻟﻣﺅﻟﻔﯾﻥ ،ﺏ .ﻁ ،ﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻣﺛﻧﻰ. ﻋﻼﻭﻧﻪ ،ﺷﺭﯾﻑ ﺭﺍﻏﺏ ،2007 ،ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺷﻌﺭﺍﺀ ﻣﻘﻠﻭﻥ ،ﺟﻣﻊ ﻭﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ
ﺍﻟﻠﻛﻧﻭﻱ ،ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺣﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻔﻭﺍﺋﺩ ﺍﻟﺑﻬﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺭﺍﺟﻡ ﺍﻟﺣﻧﻔﯾﺔ،1967 ، ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ،ﻁ ،1ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﺎﻫﺞ ﻭﺍﻟﺗﻭﺯﯾﻊ ،ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ.
ﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﻧﺩﻭﺓ ﺍﻟﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﺍﻟﻬﻧﺩ. ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻱ ،ﯾﺣﯾﻰ ﺑﻥ ﺣﻣﺯﺓ ﺑﻥ ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻁﺭﺍﺯ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ :ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺣﻣﯾﺩ
ﺍﻟﻣﺭﺯﻭﻗﻲ ،ﺃﺑﻭ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺃﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﺍﻟﺣﺳﻥ ،ﺷﺭﺡ ﺩﯾﻭﺍﻥ ﻫﻧﺩﺍﻭﻱ ،2002 ،ﻁ ،1ﺍﻟﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺻﺭﯾﺔ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﺍﻟﺣﻣﺎﺳﺔ ،ﻧﺷﺭﻩ ﺃﺣﻣﺩ ﺍﺣﻣﯾﺩ ﻭﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺳﻼﻡ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ،1991 ،ﻁ،1 ﺍﻟﻐﺯﻱ ،ﻧﺟﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ،ﺍﻟﻛﻭﺍﻛﺏ ﺍﻟﺳﺎﺋﺭﺓ ،ﺗﺣﻘﯾﻕ
ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺟﯾل ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ. ﺟﺑﺭﺍﺋﯾل ﺳﻠﯾﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﺑﻭﺭ ،ﺏ .ﺕ ،ﻁ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻛﺭ ،ﺑﯾﺭﻭﺕ.
ﺍﻟﻘﺯﻭﯾﻧﻲ ،ﺟﻼل ﺍﻟﺩﯾﻥ ﻣﺣﻣﺩ ﺑﻥ ﻋﺑﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﺣﻣﻥ ،ﺗﻠﺧﯾﺹ ﺍﻟﻣﻔﺗﺎﺡ،
ABSTRACT
The massage of "Taqseem Al-Majaz" which was composed by Ibn Kamal Basha (940h) is an important
issue and essential core for authors. It hasn't got new subject for Arabic eloquent students, but it represents
an invitation to come out of the (Skaky School) which controls the eloquent lesson with its philosophical
tendency and its logical braches. He offered two newly parts about imagination. He pretends that he
individualized the first one and invented the second one.
My task in this massage was divided into two parts. The study which includes translation for the author's
curriculum vitae, scientific position, his authoresses and an imagination brief study for the component of the
massage. Then, it includes the achievements of the massage according to the approach which I explained its
steps in the introduction.
:
. 1 1990 (1
. 2 1979 (2
. 2 . (3
. 5 1981 (4
. 2 1981 (5
. 1 1997 ............ (6
. 1 2003 (7
. . 1959 : (8
. 1 2004 (9
________________________________________________
. . 1951 (10
. 1 2001 : (11
. 1 1983 (12
. 3 1969 (13
. 1 1991 : (14
. 3 1992 : ............... (15
. . . (16
. 1 1995 (17
. . 1960 (18
. 1985 : (19
. 1980 (20
. . 3 . (21
. 1 199 8 (22
. 2 1987 : (23
. . . (24
* Ministry of Education, Amman, Jordan. Received on 12/4/2009 and Accepted for Publication on 11/8/2010.
. . 1967 (25
. . 1975 (26
. 1
1992 : (27
. . 1326 (28
. 1 2007 (29
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭ ﻱ ،ﻴ ﺤﻴﻰ ﺒﻥ ﺤ ﻤﺯﺓ ﺒﻥ ﻋﻠ ﻲ ،ﺍﻟ ﻁﺭﺍﺯ ،ﺘ ﺤﻘﻴﻕ :ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﻟﺤﻤﻴ ﺩ ﻫﻨﺩﺍﻭ ﻱ ،2002 ،ﻁ ،1ﺍﻟ ﻤ ﻜﺘﺒ ﺔ ﺍﻟ ﻌﺼﺭﻴ ﺔ ،ﺒﻴﺭﻭﺕ . (30
. . (31
. 1 2002 : : (32
. . . (33
. 1967 (34
ﺒﻴﺭﻭﺕ. 1 1991 (35