PNOC-EDC Mongoose Pre-Test Report Rev - 3

Global Technical Services
PNOC - EDC
Mongoose PT Performance Evaluation
Field Evaluation Plan
MG - 41D
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 3
EVALUATION OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................... 4

EVALUATION EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................................... 5
EVALUATION WELL ................................................................................................................................... 5
EVALUATION DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................... 7
EVALUATION – O PERATIONS INTEGRATION ............................................................................................ 7
SHAKER CAPACITY - DESIGN BENCHMARK OF 600 GPM.......................................................................... 8
SCREEN LIFE – RECORDED OBSERVATION OF 10% CELL FAILURE .......................................................... 8
SHAKER D ISCHARGE ANALYSIS – SOLIDS CONTROL EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT ................................ 9
CUT POINTS AND CUT POINT CURVES ................................................................................................... 10
DAILY SHAKER MOTION A NALYSIS – LINEAR & BALANCED ELLIPTICAL MODE EVALUATIONS........ 11
CONVEYANCE VELOCITY – O BSERVED & RECORDED MEASUREMENT ................................................. 12
MAINTENANCE & CONSUMABLES .......................................................................................................... 12
DAILY Q UALITATIVE A NALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 13
EVALUATION RESULTS....................................................................................................................... 14
APPENDIX A– TEST PROCEDURES................................................................................................... 15

SYSTEM D ETAIL AND PART N UMBERS .................................................................................................... 25
MAIN PANEL DISPLAY......................................................................................................................... 26
PERCENT OF D ISCARD = (DISCARD FLOW RATE / F EED F LOW R ATE) * 100............................................. 34
APPENDIX B – MONGOOSE PT REFERENCE DATA .................................................................... 38
Revision Number 000
Mongoose PT Performance Evaluation Date: August 12, 2009
PNOC-EDC
Revision: 002 August 18, 2009

Prepared by: Jordan Guillermo ES Engineer Date
Carlo Subardiaga ES Engineer August 18, 2009
Approved by: Mike Ritchie Engineering Date
Name PNOC - EDC Date
Chad Dutel Technical Services Date
Name Sales Date
Name Department Date
Confidential, for M-I SWACO Distribution only
Page - 2 - of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Executive Summary
The objective of this evaluation is to assess the performance of the Mongoose PT Shaker as an
approved shale shaker for use on PNOC-EDC drilling rigs. The evaluation will be conducted on
PNOC Rig 10 during drilling operations on well MG-41D. During the evaluation period, M-I
SWACO will provide engineering support on site to facilitate all evaluation protocols set forth in
this document. This will also include any operational concerns/ issues relating to the Mongoose
PT Shaker. At the end of the evaluation period, M-I SWACO will gather all qualitative &
quantitative information and sum up this data for a final review by PNOC-EDC. After this
evaluation has been concluded, once the performance criteria are satisfied, PNOC-EDC will be
able to approve the Mongoose PT Shaker for future use on their rigs.
This Mongoose Shaker PT performance evaluation will measure the quantifiable data and
monitor the qualitative aspects over the course of the test period. The quantifiable data will
determine the factors that affect the performance of the shaker during drilling and circulating
conditions. This will include the fluid capacity benchmarks, screen life, solids control efficiency,
bi-weekly motion analysis & G-Force readings, and conveyance velocity. The qualitative data will
include spares usage, general maintenance reports, M-I SWACO personnel on-site observations,
and other issues pertaining to the operation of the Mongoose PT. Combined, these data will be
taken and consolidated by qualified M-I SWACO technical services personnel and summarized at
the end of the test period.
During the course of the evaluation period, M-I SWACO will provide both technical and logistic
support through our local agent (CSA Resources Corp.) to ensure a professional and thorough
evaluation of the Mongoose PT Shaker. All data will be recorded and presented to PNOC-EDC
through a final report so as to determine that these units will perform as designed on future
projects thereof. Copies of the final report will be reported in hardcopy format and presented by
M-I SWACO technical services at the conclusion of the evaluation.
Page 3 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Evaluation Overview
Test description: The Mongoose PT shaker will be evaluated in terms of reliability and performance
during operations on the MG-41D project. The shakers will be monitored daily with the
results being captured and delivered in report form at the conclusion of the project.
Reason for test: To prove the Mongoose PT shaker as being a suitable equipment offe ring for use by
PNOC-EDC
Test Location: Cellar B Pad MG-F , Tongonan, Ormoc City, Leyte, Philippines
Test dates & duration: September 2007 Duration: 64 days
Operator: PNOC-EDC
Well name & number: MG-41D
Contractor & rig: PNOC Rig 10
Major service companies: M-I SWACO
Previous tests: No previous evaluation.
M- I SWACO Test Chad Dutel, M-I SWACO ES Capital Sales Manager

Coordinator (Singapore): cdutel@miswaco.com
M- I SWACO R&E Support: Mike Ritchie, M-I SWAC O Regional Equipment Manager
mritchie@miswaco.com
M- I SWACO Test Engineer Rogelio Retuya Jr., M-I SWACO ES c/o CSA Resources Corporation
(rig site): Service Engineer akumajun@yahoo.com
Unit 7B PDCP Bank Centre, Rufino cor.
Carlo Subardi aga, M-I SWACO ES Leviste Sts., Salcedo Village, Makati City,
Service Engineer Philippines.
subardiaga_carlo@yahoo.com
+632 (8922605) / +632 (8922528)
Jordan Guillermo, M-I SWACO ES

Service Engineer
jordanguillermo@yahoo.com
Page 4 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Evaluation Equipment
Mongoose PT: Model MTR 440-480V UL 35 Frame
Serial numbers: MRM0601
Screens: Mongoose PT pre-tensioned composite framed screens will be used during the
evaluation. These screens represent the standard offering made available for the Mongoose PT
shaker. Each screen frame is based on the THULE DURAFLO technology strengthened with a
high tensile strength steel rod wire cage. Four mesh types are available (XR, HC, XL, Market
Grade and TBC). The following screens will be used during the evaluation:
Mesh Type: Frame Type: Part Number:

MONGOOSE 30 MESH Composite WMONMG030C
MONGOOSE 40 MESH Composite WMONMG040C
MONGOOSE 84 XR Composite WMONXR084C
MONGOOSE 105 XR Composite WMONXR105 C
Evaluation Well
The Mongoose PT shaker evaluation will be conducted on the MG-41D well. The following table
outlines the proposed drilling fluids program for the project.
Table 2 MG-41D Drilling Parameters
Depth Interval Bit Size Casing Mud Properties

(m) (inch)
0-101 m 26” 20” Spud Mud

Avg. Density = 8.8-9.0 ppg
FV = 70-100 s/qt
pH = 10-11.5
PV/YP = 6-12 (cp) /25-40(lbs/100ft2 )
Gel Strength = 10/20-15/30
Max Sand Content = 0.25%
101-703 m 17-1/2” 13-3/8” Low Solids Polymer Mud(Non-

dispersed)
FV = 50-65 s/qt
pH = 10-11.5
PV/YP = 7-15 (cp) /15-25(lbs/100ft2 )
Page 5 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Max Sand Content = 0.3%-0.5%
703-1755m 12-1/4” 9-5/8” Low Solids Polymer Mud (Dispersed)

FV = 45-60 s/qt
pH = 10.5-11.5
PV/YP = 5-15 (cp) /8-22(lbs/100ft2 )
Max Sand Content = 0.3%-0.5%
1755-2800m 8-1/2“ 7-5/8“ Water (Blind Drilling) with Hi-Vis

Polymer Mud Sweeps every Kelly down
(2445mTVD)
(and at half Kelly if needed)
Page 6 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Evaluation Description
The evaluation will be conducted during well MG-41D with monitoring, sampling, operation,
maintenance, and reporting being conducted by on-site M-I SWACO Technical Service Engineers.
Quantitative analysis will be used to determine mass flow rates discharged, screen life, G factor,
motion type, noise levels, maintenance costs, retention of fluid on cuttings, and maximum flow
handling capacities of the shakers. In addition, qualitative analysis will be performed to
document ease of use, general performance observations, maintenance requirements, and the
adaptability of the shakers to dynamic drilling conditions.
Qualitative analysis will provide PNOC-EDC with pertinent information from which a more
informed decision can be made. The industry has no set requirements for shaker performance
with which to certify the shakers, and PNOC-EDC may not have equivalent data from current
vendors to make accurate comparisons. Therefore, the qualitative portion of this evaluation has
been included to provide a means in which PNOC-EDC’s own on-site personnel will be able to
participate and contribute to the overall analysis of the shakers performance.
The evaluation will conclude with a compilation of the data acquired being submitted to PNOC-
EDC in the form of a report and presentation by M-I SWACO of the results.
Evaluation – Operations Integration

The Mongoose PT shakers will be installed, monitored, and maintained on site by M-I SWACO
personnel. In addition, all performance evaluation as outlined within this protocol will be
conducted by the on-site M-I SWACO personnel. Data obtained from the results of all testing
and analysis conducted will be recorded and summarized into a final report to be issued to both
M-I SWACO and PNOC-EDC for review.
M-I SWACO will insure the equipment is within proper operating parameters as listed in the
operations manual. In addition, M-I SWACO will provide oversight to the installation of the
equipment prior to the evaluation starting to insure proper operation of the equipment will be
achievable during the evaluation process. M-I SWACO personnel will be responsible for
continuous maintenance during the evaluation to insure the equipment operates as specified
throughout the evaluation process.
M-I SWACO may suggest alterations to the existing fluid feed system of the chosen rig to control
flow distribution to the installed equipment. Flow may be controlled through rig isolation valve
settings between the individual shakers. The rig pump rates will also be used to control fluid
feed rates for specific evaluations. These flow rates will be determined by the rig pump rates
received from the rig’s monitoring systems. If M-I SWACO requires modification to the fluid
Page 7 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
feed system, but is not allowed to make such modifications to insure proper operation and
performance of the equipment, the evaluation will be modified to include the impact of the fluid
feed distribution limitations and those impacts will be included in the summary of each test as
required.
The following sections will outline the individual performance evaluations to be conducted
including the protocols for performing each evaluation, the data to be recorded, and the goals of
each test.
Shaker Capacity - Design Benchmark of 600gpm

The designed shaker capacity is the engineering criteria utilized for determining the minimum
number of shakers required for a sized system. For example, a 2,400 gpm system output would
require a minimum of four Mongoose shakers – 2,400gpm/600gpm = 4 and a 3,300gpm system
would require a minimum of six Mongoose shakers – 3,300 gpm/600gpm=5.5 rounded up to 6.
This minimum design benchmark will be evaluated by measuring the capacity of fluid that
Mongoose shaker is able to process during various drilling stages.
The Mongoose PT shaker capacity will be measured once during each drilling interval by
conducting a Maximum Capacity Based on Feed Flow Rate Test. This test will require that one
shaker fit with the recommended screen size for that interval be allocated to receive 100% of the
flow rate returned from the well. The Mongoose PT shaker will be set at maximum deck angle
and the flow will be increased until the shaker has reached its limit of capacity without
discharging whole mud. This flow rate will be maintained for a period of 10 minutes without
whole mud losses to qualify as a successful measurement. The corresponding feed flow rate as
displayed from the driller’s monitor will be recorded for that interval.
Once a steady state condition has been maintained for the 10 minute interval, a sample will be
collected from the discharge of the shaker to be analyzed to determine the liquid phase content
by retort analysis (Appendix A2) and the solids discharge flow rate using the Wet Solids
Discharge Mass Flow Rate (Appendix A1).
During intermediate sections of the well, this test will be conducted after the Formation Integrity
Test has been performed and prior to drilling operations commence for the following interval.
The test should not begin until new formation cuttings are being received at surface to insure the
evaluation is representative of drilling conditions.
Screen Life – Recorded Observation of 10% Cell Failure

Screen life is the measurement of the drilling period that a screen maintains operational integrity.
Screen life is normally determined by a predetermined number of cell failures. A cell failure can
be described as the loss of the top layer of screen mesh or significant damage to the top layer of
screen mesh. M-I SWACO generally considers a screen as reaching failure when 10% of the cells
Page 8 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
have lost or damaged top mesh. Until 10% of cells fail, damaged cells can be repaired utilizing
various cell plugging techniques.
The screen life will be determined by recording the number of hours each screen has been
vibrating from the time the screen is placed on the shaker until it is removed after having failed.
Failure will be classified as damage, whole or in part, to 22 individual cells on the screen. If the
damaged cells are repaired they will still count toward the total number of failed cells. The count
of 22 cell failures represents 10% failure of the entire screen. In addition to the vibrating hours,
the footage drilled and barrels of cuttings processed by each screen will be recorded and
documented. Failure cells for each screen will also be documented to identify any failure
patterns that may exist. All screen data collection will be recorded daily along with
corresponding operational data including bit size, pump rates, rates of penetration, and flow line
feed to the shaker so that the impact of those operating conditions can be evaluated against the
screen life obtained. To insure proper documentation and tracking of the screen life, procedures
from Appendix A7 will be followed.
Shaker Discharge Analysis – Solids Control Efficiency Measurement

The shaker discharge analysis is an evaluation of the Mongoose’s ability to separate incoming
returns into a distinct effluent that returns to the active system and a distinct discharge usually
classified as waste. This classification ability is the primary purpose of the machine. This
measurement is dependent upon many variables and is not benchmarked to a fixed percentage,
but recorded and observed in correlation to relevant drilling conditions.
The shaker discharge analysis portion of the Mongoose PT evaluation will consist of two
procedures; the Wet Solids Discharge Mass Flow Rate and the Wet Solids Discharge Solids
Content and Density. These tests will be run on a daily basis for the primary shakers in both
linear and balanced elliptical motion for each machine. The purpose of the Shaker Discharge
Analysis will be to demonstrate the equipments ability to discharge solids from the fluid stream
with minimal loss of weight material and fluid retention on cuttings (ROC).
The Wet Solids Discharge Mass Flow Rate procedure will be conducted on a daily basis during
drilling operations as per the protocol outlined in Appendix A1. The Wet Solids Discharge Mass
Flow Rate will provide a representative analysis of the volume of solids discharged by the
shakers from the flow line fluid feed. This data can be correlated with the daily drilling
parameters at the time of sampling to compare the solids discharge with the ROP, flow rates, hole
size, and screen sizes being used.
The Wet Solids Discharge Solids Content and Solids Density procedures will be conducted on a
daily basis at the same time as the Wet Solids Discharge Mass Flow Rate procedure. This
procedure will quantify the shakers’ ability to minimize ROC which means the ability to
minimize the loss of water or base fluid carried away on discharged material. This measured by
doing a retort following the procedure in Appendix A2. If the fluid is unweighted, water-based
Page 9 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
mud then this can be determined more quickly by measuring the cuttings density (the procedures
for measuring density are in Appendix A3 and A4.) When used with the retort data, the cuttings
density can indicate if one screen mesh is removing more barite than another. This scenario will
only be present if different mesh screens are utilized on each shaker. Representative samples for
these tests can be taken from the cuttings collector used to measure the discharge mass flow rate.
Cut Points and Cut Point Curves

Cut points are used to indicate the separation characteristics of solids-control equipment in a
given moment in time. Cut point curves (Appendix A7) are derived from wet sieve test data and
indicate, at the actual moment of data collection, the percentage of chance that a particle of a
particular size can flow through or be discarded by the solids-control equipment. Therefore, the
cut point curve is a function of the physical solids, physical condition of the solids control
equipment, and the drilling fluids properties.
The mass flow rate of various-size particles discarded from the equipment is compared with the
mass flow rate of the same –size particles presented to the equipment. When testing a particular
unit, knowledge of the feed flow rate into the unit and the two discharge flow rates are required.
Cut point for shale shakers are measured by determining the particle size distribution of the feed
and discard streams with the use of a stack of U.S. Standard Sieve.
Samples of the discard and underflow streams are taken from the solids-control equipment for
analysis. The density, volume flow rates, and mass flow rates of all streams are measured using
the procedure in Appendix A7. To determine the screen cut point curve, the quantity of a
particular-size particle in the discard must be compared with the quantity of the same-size
particles presented to the screen.
A cut point curve graphically displays the fraction of various-size particles removed by the
solids-control equipment with the quantity of that size of particle presented in the equipment.
For example a D 50 cut point is the intersection of the 50% data point on the Y axis and the
corresponding micron size on the X axis on the cut point cure. This cut point indicates the size of
the particles in the feed to the solids-control equipment that will have 50% chance of passing
through the equipment and a 50% chance of discharging off of the equipment. Cut point curves
indicate the fraction of solids of various sizes that are separated. The cut point of the solids
control equipment will be determined by the physical condition of the equipment and the
properties of the drilling fluid.
Appendix A7 is a procedure detailing the required steps to perform this method of particle-size
analysis and the calculations used to create a cut point cure.
Page 10 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Daily Shaker Motion Analysis – Linear & Balanced Elliptical Mode Evaluations
The M-I SWACO Motion Analysis System is an instrument that is used by M-I SWACO certified
personnel to evaluate a shaker’s performance in regards to the motion that it produces. The
motion analyzer provides the user with a number of outputs that indicate whether the shaker is
performing as designed. The primary measurements recorded by the unit are G factor, motor
RPM, and the angle of inclination. These readings are then used to produce a graphical
representation of the shaker’s motion.
Shakers in today’s industry produce circular, elliptical, or linear motions. A linear motion shaker
produces a G factor along a straight line at an angle from the shaker bed. This angle is the angle
of inclination. The horizontal component of this motion is used for conveyance while the vertical
component is used for fluid transmittance. An elliptical motion shaker produces an ellipse type
motion with its major axis along the angle of inclination. A circular motion shaker has no angle
of inclination. M-I SWACO’s motion analysis system is designed to measure and graph these
properties based on the actual motion produced. In addition, the motion analyzer system can
measure the G factors produced along the vertical axis, the horizontal axis, and the axis of
inclination. These measurements are also displayed graphically as output to indicate the type of
motion. By measuring these variables in multiple positions along the shaker basket, a thorough
evaluation of the shaker’s performance in respects to motion can be made.
The motion analysis system as designed by M-I SWACO is an important tool to measure actual
shaker performance under various loading situations & drilling operations. The motion analysis
system does not affect local operations when being utilized onsite although the proper permits
are required when using the system in a classified area. The accelerometer itself is a dual axis-
measuring sensor which measures the horizontal and vertical vectors of acceleration. The
frequencies at which these measurements occur are used to determine the motor speed. The
angle of inclination is calculated from the measured vectors of acceleration. The shape of the
produced motion is determined by calculating the elliptical axis produced along the angle of
inclination. For example, equal major and minor axis along the angle of inclination w ould
produce a circular motion while an unequal value between the major and minor axis produces an
elliptical shape.
The values measured by the Motion Analysis System and the results calculated are used to
produce a graphical representation. These results are then used to evaluate produced motion
type, the G factor produced and the angle of inclination. The forces produced by a shakers
motion are subdivided into forces acting along a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The force
components along these two axis impact solids conveyance and fluid transmittance respectively.
The resulting force created along the angle of inclination is the overall indicator of how these
forces are divided between conveyance and transmittance. A higher angle of inclination results
in higher conductance of fluids through the screen surface while the shakers conveyance ability is
reduced. A lower angle of inclination increases the conveyance action with a loss in
transmittance. Some shakers offer a method for adjusting the angle of inclination allowing some
further control over shaker performance.
Page 11 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
When performing motion analysis on the shaker it is important to measure various

corresponding positions on both sides of the shaker. Six readings on each side of the basket are
taken to determine whether consistent motion exists throughout the shaker bed. To provide for
an accurate reading of all the variables, a horizontal surface parallel to the direction of motion
should be used. Horizontal surfaces at or near the level of the screen surfaces will also provide
for a more accurate representation of what motion and force is occurring on the screens
themselves
The M-I SWACO Motion Analysis System is a very powerful tool available to M-I SWACO
certified personnel for evaluating shaker systems. The results produced are a key component in
measuring overall system functionality and how this functionality may be vary during various
drilling operations. The data captured utilizing this system is available in a database format. The
availability and utilization of the M-I SWACO Motion Analysis System is a critical component of
the expertise that can be offered by M-I SWACO and is not found elsewhere in this market. The
Motion Analysis User Manual will be included with the test apparatus.
The Motion Analysis System will be run on each shaker in both linear and balanced elliptical
modes on a bi-weekly basis. In addition, the Motion Analysis will be used to determine the
shakers ability to continue to perform within the manufactures specifications o ver the period of
the evaluation. Ref: Appendix A6.
Conveyance Velocity – Observed & Recorded Measurement

Conveyance velocity is the average speed in ft/s at which solid materials travel the length of the
shaker screen surface. This measurement provides a means to identify a change in the shaker’s
ability to discharge material at varying shaker bed settings and varying drilling parameters. This
measurement is dependent upon many variables and is not benchmarked to a fixed conveyance
velocity, but recorded and observed in correlation to relevant drilling conditions.
This procedure was developed for measuring the rate at which solids are transported down the
screen surface. This will be done quantitatively by measuring the cuttings transport velocity
using the procedure in Appendix A5.
The ability to transport solids across the screen and discharge them from the shaker is principally
governed by the motion of the shaker and the design of the screen. Other drilling conditions,
such as gumbo, will affect the solids transport, and these should be noted to ensure the test
results are properly interpreted.
Maintenance & Consumables

Routine maintenance will be performed as per the Mongoose PT shaker operations manual. Any
maintenance outside of the prescribed procedures required during this evaluation will be
documented as well as any and all parts required to perform repairs. Consumable items used
Page 12 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
during the evaluation will be tracked and compared with the recommended spare parts list as
indicated in the operation manual. In addition, the costs of all parts, including consumables will
be documented during the evaluation. The Mongoose PT shaker operations manual will be
included with the test apparatus.
Daily Qualitative Analysis

During the Mongoose PT evaluation qualitative assessments and observations of the shakers will
be obtained from rig and service personnel at the well site. These observations will be captured
and documented through biweekly check-sheets issued to the Mud Engineer, Toolpusher, Driller,
and PNOC-EDC representative. The check-sheet is attached in Appendix A8. These check-sheets
will provide a means in which to insure the pertinent parties are able to participate in the trial by
providing comments and ratings in the listed categories on the check-sheets.
In addition to the biweekly check-sheets, pictures and video will be used to record and document
the performance of the Mongoose PT shakers during the field trial. Categories of interest to be
qualitatively assessed will include the effects of deck angle, ease of repair and maintenance,
screen changing and inspection, and motion changes effecting relative performance.
Page 13 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Evaluation Results
Page 14 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Appendix A– Test Procedures
A.1 Wet Solids Discharge Mass Flow Rate

A rough and ready, but reasonably reliable, method to measure the discharge mass flow rate is to
use a collection trough that spans the width of the discharge end of the shaker. This ensures that
all liquids and solids being discharged are collected. The accuracy of this test can be greatly
improved by using a large sample catcher and by taking a statistically significant number of
samples.
Equipment
1) Sample catcher – a collection trough that spans the width of the discharge end of the
shaker is the preferred option. This can be readily manufactured by taking a length of 8-
inch diameter plastic pipe, splitting it down the center, then taking one of the lengths of
half pipe and capping it at both ends.
2) Balance - a top-loading or spring balance capable of weighting up to 1 00 lbs with a
precision of ± 0.5 lb.
3) Stop watch to measure the time to fill the sample catcher.
4) Wide mouth sample bottles – 250 ml is sufficient for retort analysis.
Procedure & Analysis

1) Wash the screens to check for any damage before starting the test; the performance
testing must be done with undamaged screens. It may be necessary to remove the
screens for this examination.
2) Suspend the collection trough over the end of the screen and start collecting the sample.
3) Start the timer and note the time it takes for the sample trough to fill.
4) Weigh the wet cuttings sample.
5) Calculate the discharge rate in short tons per hour.
6) Repeat the measurements until a statistically significant discharge rate is obtained. To
test for statistical significance determine the standard deviation of the data set, multiply
this by two and divide it by the average of the data set. Express this number as a percent.
If the number is less than 15%, then the data is good and there is no need to repeat the
measurements.
Page 15 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
A.2 Wet Solids Discharge Retort Analysis

Gravimetric analysis using the 50 ml mud retort is the preferred method to determine the amount
of dry solids and the amount of oil or base fluid in the wet cuttings discharge sample.
Sampling
The sampling technique used to collect the solids for the retort analysis should ensure that a
representative cuttings sample is taken from the shaker overflow. This means collecting evenly
from across the width of the shaker, and not just in the middle or at the edge near the basket
where the flow might be higher. For double deck shakers, it must be made clear if the sample is
from the top deck, bottom deck or both.
The easiest way is to use the cuttings collected from the discharge mass flow rate test and mix
them lightly until a homogeneous blend of liquid and solids is achieved.
If the discharge mass flow rate test is not carried out, the same cuttings collection method should
be used, the only difference being that less sample is required. (At least one gallon of sample
should be collected, and up to four gallons is preferred.) For multi-shaker testing, a composite
sample can be collected by (a) sampling the shaker with the highest discharge rate first and
recording the time to collect about one gallon of sample, (b) collecting samples from each of the
other shakers for the same length of time, and (c) mixing the samples together to obtain a
homogeneous blend.
Take the required sub-samples for on-site analysis or collection in sample jars for later analysis in
the laboratory. For best results, the sample analysis should be run as soon as possible after
mixing. If running a retort test, do not discard the sample before the Mass Balance Factor (MBF)
has been determined as the test may have to be run again if the MBF is outside the 5% limit (see
the Cuttings Retort Analysis procedure below).
Equipment
1) Retort Instrument - the recommended retort instrument for this application is the 50 cm3
mud retort with external heating jacket. Specifications are given in API RP 13B-2
Appendix B. A heat regulator should be included with the retort. This will help produce
better results by standardizing the initial heat ramp up time and reducing safety concerns
associated with fluid blowing through the condenser. (Refer to MI HSE bulletin).
2) Liquid Receiver - the reco mmended liquid receiver is a 20 cm3 J tube marked with 0.10
cm3 graduations. This is the 20 cm3 tube shown under receiver specifications in API RP
13B-2 Appendix B. The optional 50 cm3 receiver has insufficient precision for thi s
application. The optional 10 cm3 J-tube has sufficient precision, but may not have
sufficient capacity for all applications. The 10 cm3 J-tube will provide a higher degree of
accuracy when testing dry solids (i.e. >2 percent synthetic by weight on cuttings).
Page 16 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
3) Balance - a top-loading balance capable of weighting up to 2000 grams with a precision of

0.1 gram is also required. Unless motion is a problem, an electronic balance may be used.
On floating drilling platforms a three-beam balance is recommended.
4) Fine steel wool (No. 000 untreated with corrosion inhibitor) for packing retort body.
5) Thread sealant, high temperature lubricant, e.g. Never-SeezR or equivalent, to lubricate
and seal threads on retort cup and stem. Apply only a small drop when using a
lubricant.
6) Pipe cleaners - to clean condenser and retort stem.
7) Brush - to clean receivers.
8) Retort spatula - to clean retort cup.
9) Corkscrew - to remove spent steel wool.
10) Thick heavy gloves – for handling retort chambers to prevent burns.
Procedure
This procedure is specifically intended to measure the amount of water and oil (or synthetic
material) on drill cuttings. It is a retort test that measures water and oil (or base synthetic
material) released by heating a cuttings sample in a properly operating retort instrument. A
known weight of sample is placed in the retort chamber and heated to vaporize the liquid
components. These vapors are then condensed and collected in a precision graduated receiver of
known weight. The weight of the receiver and recovered liquids is then measured and the dry
weight of the receiver subtracted to determine the weight of the liquids. The volume of water is
measured in the graduated receiver and converted to weight by multiplying the volume by the
density of water, which can be assumed to be 1.00 g/cm 3. This weight subtracted from the total
weight of recovered liquids yields the weight of oil (or base synthetic material) recovered.
1) Clean and dry the retort assembly and condenser.

2) Pack the retort body with steel wool.
3) Weigh and record the total mass of the retort cup, lid, and body with steel wool (M1 g).
4) Partially fill the retort cup (approximately 75% full) with a representative cuttings sample
and place lid on the cup. No liquid should come through the hole in the lid (this
procedure does not require an exact volume). Material that comes through the hole may
not be representative of the entire sample, thus altering the sample. If this happens, the
procedure must be restarted at step c.
5) Weigh the retort cup containing sample with lid in place, (but without thread lubricant
applied), and the retort body packed with steel wool. Record the total mass (M 2, g).
Page 17 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
6) Apply a thin coat of lubricant/sealant to the threads of the retort cup (not to the threads
on the body). Screw the retort cup (with lid in place) onto the retort body (packed with
steel wool).
7) Attach the condenser and place retort assembly into the heating jacket.
8) Weigh and record the mass (M3, g) of the clean and dry liquid receiver. Place the receiver
below condenser outlet.
9) Turn on the retort. Allow it to run a minimum of 1 hour. (If solids boil over into the
receiver the test must be rerun. It may indicate that more steel wool should be used.)
10) Remove the liquid receiver when no more liquid is coming out of the condenser. Allow
it to cool to below 900° F. Read and record the water volume at the lowest point of the
meniscus and record the volume of water recovered. This is water volume (V w, cm3).
The water weight, Mw, is the water volume times the water density, which in this case is
1.00 g/cm 3. (Note: If an emulsion interface is present between the oil and the water,
heating the interface may break the emulsion. Avoid boiling the liquids. Cool by
holding receiver under cool, running tap water before reading the water volume. Avoid
getting water in the receiver.)
11) Weigh and record the mass (M 5, g) of the receiver and its liquid content.
12) Turn off the retort. Remove the retort assembly and condenser from the heating jacket
and allow them to cool (do not submerse the threaded connection in water while
cooling). Remove the condenser.
13) Weigh and record the mass (M4, g) of the cool and dry retort assembly w ithout the
condenser.
14) Clean the retort assembly and condenser.
15) Enter measurements in the sample data acquisition worksheet to complete the analysis.
Analysis
Mass of wet cuttings, Mwc (g) = M2 - M1

Mass of dry cuttings, Mdc (g) = M4 - M1
Mass of water, Mw (g) = V w x 1.0
Mass of oil, Mo (g) = M5 - M3 - Mw
If no oil is present, then

Mo = 0
Mass of water, M w (g) = M 5 – M3
Oil retention (% of wet cuttings) = M o/M wc x 100

Oil retention (% of dry cuttings) = M o/M dc x 100
Page 18 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
To check the accuracy the wet weight can be compared to the component weights. If the test is
done properly and providing accurate results, then:
M wc = M dc + Mw + Mo
Field experience has shown that there is normally some loss of volatile fractions during the
distilling process. Therefore, in practice, the test is only considered good if the calculated sample
mass after retorting is within 5.0 % of the measured sample mass before retorting. This is the
Mass Balance Factor.
Page 19 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
A.3 Cuttings Density (Bucket Method)

Cuttings density is a quick and easy method to compare the amount of mud removed with
cuttings from a control and test shaker when drilling with light weight mud systems. The shaker
discharge with the highest cuttings density will be the one that has the least amount of liquid
phase. The most convenient method to obtain the cuttings density in the field is by the so -called
bucket method.
Equipment
1) Sample catcher – 5-gallon bucket.
2) Balance - scale capable of weighing up to 100 lbs with an accuracy of ± 0.5 lb is generally
sufficient (this is roughly equivalent to ± 1% w/w when the bucket is two-thirds full).
3) Clean non-aqueous base fluid of known specific gravity; use same base fluid as the
drilling fluid.
4) Fresh water.
Procedure & Analysis

1) Place the empty 5-gallon capacity bucket on a scale and zero the weight measurement.
2) Catch a cuttings sample, filling the bucket about two-thirds full.
3) Weigh the prepared bucket and sample to obtain the net weight of wet cuttings.
4) Fill the bucket with liquid (water for water-based mud and base fluid for oil-based mud)
to the 5-gallon mark while stirring to remove any entrapped air.
5) Weigh the total sample (cuttings plus added liquid) and calculate the weight of liquid
added by subtracting the cuttings weight determined in Step 3.
6) Divide the liquid weight by the liquid density to obtain the volume of liquid added.
7) Subtract the liquid volume from the bucket capacity (5 gallons) to obtain the wet cuttings
volume.
8) Divide the weight of wet cuttings (determined in Step 3) by the volume of wet cuttings
(determined in Step 7) to obtain the wet cuttings density.
Page 20 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
A.4 Cuttings Transport Velocity
This procedure was developed for measuring the rate at which solids are transported down the
screen surface. Solids conveyance is affected by many factors from shaker and screen
configuration to the drilling application parameters. All factors need to be taken into
consideration and recorded as accurately as possible.
General
In order to perform this procedure, the following items must be used:

 Stopwatch
 Conveyance Object (such as a 4” x 4.25” Ziploc baggie filled with a sample of wet testing
solids; testing solids usually consist of a multi-sized particle sand, and the testing fluid is
usually water)
Procedure
Note: Access to the leading side of the feed screen is preferred but not mandatory. Document the
screen location at which the test will be initiated.
Collect all test parameter information and record in Table 1 (see page 4).
Ensure fluid flow over shaker is in stable condition. If flow surges or stops during the test,
disregard the results and restart the test.
Introduce the conveyance object to the predetermined location of the first accessible screen. This
“drop zone” is usually near the fluid feed. The object should be placed in the center of the screen
on a crown decked machine. Flat panel machines can be tested anywhere across the screen
surface.
Page 21 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Immediately begin timing with the stopwatch as the conveyance object enters the fluid pool (see
Figure 1).
The conveyance object will usually emerge from the fluid pool as it travels towards the discharge
end of the shaker. Be prepared to “catch” the object as it nears the end of the last screen. Stop the
time on the stopwatch as the center of the conveyance object crosses the end of the discharge
screen. Record this first timed measurement in Table 2.
Repeat the test until 5 consistent timed measurement results are achieved. Results for all runs
should deviate by no more than 10 seconds. Typically, this can be achieved in about 5-7 runs.
Note: Be sure to use the same approximate “drop point” when introducing the conveyance object
into the fluid pool at the beginning of each test. The travel distance of the object should be
consistent for each run.
Page 22 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Start timer as
“Drop Zone” conveyance object
enters fluid pool
Stop timer as
conveyance object
crosses end of
discharge screen
Discharge End
Figure 1
Page 23 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Test Parameters
Date
Shaker Make and Model
Screen Types and Mesh
Qty of Screens per Machine
Screen Length
Linear or Elliptical Motion
Deck Angle
Mud Type
Formation Type
Flow Rate
Percent Screen Coverage
Table 1
Timed Measurement
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Test 4
Test 5
Table 2
Page 24 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
A.5 Motion Analysis System
System Detail and Part Numbers
B00K00100
Accelerometer Cable
p/n 01-2290
Protector Case
p/n 01-2338
Data Acquisition Unit

p/n 01-2337
USB Cable
Included with Data
Acquisition Unit
Bi-Axial Accelerometer and Magnetic Base

p/n 01-2288 and 01-2289
Page 25 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Main Panel Display
Acceleration Signal
Visually displays the
Acceleration or Amplitude
vs. Time of each axis
Motion
Visually displays the
motion of the separator
Test Notes
Allows user to enter test
specific information
Equipment to Test
Choose type of equipment
to display specific Data
Page 26 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
A.6 Screen Life
Screen wear is caused by a combination of fatigue resulting from screen vibration and abrasion
due to the action of the solids on the mesh. Because of these two different wear mechanisms it is
important to know the number of hours the screen was vibrating and the quantity and type of
material that has passed over the screen. Most screen tests simply record the screen life as the
elapsed time from when the screen was first installed on the shaker until it was finally removed.
For sales purposes this is often adequate, but for engineering testing it is not as it does not help us
understand the failure mechanism.
The screen life is the number of hours the screen has been vibrating on the shaker from the time it
was first installed until it was removed after having failed. Deciding when a screen has failed
and must be removed from the shaker is often a qualitative judgment. A useful failure criterion
for a hook screen might be when a tear appears (say 1” long or more) that allows large particles in
the mud. As these screens often fail shortly after the appearance of first damage, then the time to
failure is generally regarded as the screen life. For panel screens, which can be repaired, the time
to failure can be much longer than the time to first damage. In this case, deciding when a screen
has failed can be quantified by specifying the number of panels that have been damaged and
subsequently repaired, generally expressed as a percentage of the total panel count.
Screens can also fail due to plugging by near size particles or fibers from lost circulation material.
When this occurs the particles effectively become part of the mesh increasing the screen weight
and reducing the screen open area causing solids to accumulate on the areas of the screen where
the mud can’t drain away (similar to solids accumulation at screen joints or on bonding strips).
The combination of increased weight and solids accumulation leads to increased wear and
eventual failure. Deciding when a screen has failed due to plugging is also a qualitative
judgment. As the screen becomes plugged, the dry beach length reduces until the screen
eventually floods. If this situation cannot be remedied by cleaning with a high pressure wash
gun, then the screen can be considered to have failed.
The screen life procedures described here are designed to track the total hours the screen has
been vibrating on the shaker up to the time of failure defined by quantitative failure criteria, and
to plot this against the average flow rate of wet solids over the screen. This normalizes the screen
life data and allows the life of different screens to be compared at equal solids loading. To do
this requires full time attention by the Test Engineer to ensure that the data is properly collected.
Equipment
1) Torque wrench of the required torque for tensioning hook screens.
2) Anti-seize grease for the tension bolt threads (for changing hook screens).
3) High pressure/low volume wash gun (1200 - 3000 psi @ 2-4 gpm).
4) Plug inserts or silicone gel sealant for repairing screens.
Page 27 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
5) Digital camera (a digital video camera may be used as well).

6) Scribe or other tool for numbering screens (required when the screen does not have a
unique serial number). The number should be legible for the life of the screen.
7) Accelerometer to check the condition of the shakers prior to the test.
Procedure
1) Establish the screen failure criteria before the start of the test. In most cases this will
follow the practices used by the rig, although for a new screen product, Product
Development may set the failure criteria. Example failure criteria are given below:
Hook screen 1” tear that allows large particles in mud or screen floods due to
plugging with near size particles.
Panel screen 10% of panels damaged or completely plugged with near-size
particles.
2) Carefully inspect each shaker before the test to ensure it is in good working order and
that the clamping (or tensioning) system, deck rubbers and other components are in good
condition. Replace any defective parts and lubricate the threads of the tension bolts with
anti-seize grease. Screens that rub against steel because the deck rubbers are worn will
rapidly fail. It is also a good idea to use an accelerometer to check that the motion and
acceleration are correct. If a shaker is found to be defective, then it must be repaired
before the test can start. There is no point in running a screen test on a defective shaker.
3) Carefully inspect each screen before it is put on the shaker, looking in particular for
handling damage or manufacturing defects. Also, carefully measure the screen
dimensions to ensure it is within specification. If a defect screen is detected, note and
photograph the damaged areas and send it back to the manufacturer for analysis. Do not
put it on the shaker - there is no point in testing a damaged screen.
4) Ensure each screen has a unique identifying number from the manufacturer. If no such
number exists, then an identifying number will be etched on the screen on arrival at the
location. This number is used to track the screen using the Screen Life Workbook. It is
also used to identify the screen in the picture and video library. The screen number is the
first entry in the picture description.
5) Before installing any screens, wash the shaker bed clean of any debris and inspect the
basket for signs of wear or damage. Also, check the clamping/tensioning mechanism and
clean any bolts, nuts and springs. Proper screen placement cannot be achieved if debris
comes between the screen and the bed, or if the clamping/tensioning mechanism is
functioning incorrectly.
6) To install hook screens place the screens on the shaker and tighten the tension bolts on
each side using a socket and ratchet starting with the middle bolts first, followed by the
outer bolts last (remember to apply anti-seize to the tension bolt threads). Next, take a
torque wrench and tighten each bolt to the required torque. Check the tension using the
Page 28 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
same sequence as above every four hours for the first twenty-four hours of operation if
under load. If the screen tension has not changed during this period, check the tension
every twenty-four hours thereafter. Hook screens must be handled carefully and
tensioned correctly to get maximum life and optimum solids conveyance. Always take
care to minimize bending or folding of the mesh, and never roll the screens up as this
will drastically reduce the screen life.
7) To install frame screens simply place the screens on the shaker and install following the
manufacturer’s instructions. Once installed, check that the screens are tight and that
there are no gaps around or between the panels that could cause solids to by-pass the
screen mesh. If the clamping mechanism uses pneumatics, check that the bladder
(actuator) pressure is correct and that there are no leaks. (For example, the minimum
bladder pressure for the BEM-600 is 25 psi; for the VSM 300 it is 40 psi.)
8) Run the screen until the first appearance of damage, taking care to minimize plugging
and blinding by frequent washing with a high pressure/low volume wash gun (1200 -
3000 psi @ 2-4 gpm). Mud left on the screens will temporarily plug the mesh openings
and this should be washed off each time circulation has stopped. Use drill water or
seawater for water based mud and base oil for synthetic or oil based mud.
9) Inspect the screens every 3 to 4 hours to ensure early detection of any damage. On some
shakers with flat panel screens it may be necessary to remove some of the screens for
proper inspection. For hook screens this is not practical; in fact taking the screens on and
off the shaker might compromise performance and screen life. Ensure the screens are
washed (use pressure wash if necessary ensuring that the flow is directed from the back
of the screen) before inspection.
 Inspect the screens with care as initial damage can appear as a dulling of the mesh or
pinholes that are difficult to detect. Look for breaks in the glue and any tearing,
especially along the bonding line. Also, look for evidence of plugging by near size
particles or blinding by polymer “fish-eyes”, grease or water-wet oil-based mud
solids.
 If a damaged or worn screen is detected, record the depth, date and time of the first
appearance of damage and describe the wear in detail, including supporting video
and/or photographs. Use a reference grid to indicate the damaged areas or repairs.
 Repair the screen (if necessary) following the manufacturer's procedures and put it
back in the same position it came from, either on the same shaker or on a different
shaker if it desirable to rotate screens. Do not rotate screens between different panel
positions (i.e. rear left to front right) as this will add additional variation to the test
and make the data more difficult to interpret.
10) Run the damaged screen to failure:
 Inspect the screens as before to look for deterioration in the screen condition. When
the screen has failed remove it from the shaker and note the depth, date and time.
Page 29 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
 Wash off any surface material (do not pressure wash as this will remove particles
trapped in the mesh and between the screen layers) and photograph the screen
damage. Use the reference grid to indicate the positions of any additional plugged,
blind or damaged apertures, or any other damage. Describe in detail the nature of
the damage and the general screen condition.
11) Retain all used screens for return to the supplier, ensuring they are properly labeled with
the delivery address and contact person, test designation, screen number, screen
description, and the Test Engineer who packed and labeled the screens.
Analysis
1) Using the Screen Life Workbook, determine the screen lif e for each screen that has been
run to failure and plot this against the flow rate of wet solids over the screen.
2) Complete the Screen Run Report for each failed screen.
A.7 Cut Point Analysis
Feed:
1) If a flow meter is unavailable, determine the flow rate to the solids control equipment.
To calculate the flow rate, the fluid pump’s gallons per stroke, strokes per minute, and
efficiency must be known. The flow rate can then be calculated by:
Flow Rate = (cylinder volume * N) (spm) (pump efficiency)
Where:
Cylinder volume = (((pump sleeve inner diameter in inches)2 *π)/4) * pump
stroke length in inches (.00433 in 3/gal)
N = number of pump cylinders
(spm) = strokes per minute
2) Take a representative sample from the feed stream and measure the density.
Underflow:
1) Weigh the sampling container. A minimum container size of 5 gallons is

recommended in order to capture a large sample of solids.
Page 30 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
2) Take a representative sample from the underflow (effluent) stream of the solids
control equipment system (see Figure 4.1- note that using a smaller container to fill the
larger sampling container will not adversely affect the solids sample) .
Figure 4.1: Sample is taken directly from the effluent stream
3) Weigh the sampling container and effluent sample.
4) Calculate the weight of the effluent sample

Weight of Effluent Sample = Effluent Sample and Container – Weight of Container
5) Wet sieve and dry the sieved solids thoroughly*.
Slowly pour the collected sample through a stack of U.S. Standard Sieve screens with
a broad distribution of micron opening sizes (see Section 4.2 for a representative
distribution of sieve sizes). A gentle stream of water is used to wash the solids and to
assist the sieving process (see Figures 4.2 and 4.3).
Page 31 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Once the sample has completely passed through the stack of sieves, each sample of
solids on each individual sieve must be dried. Drying can be accomplished by
placing the sample in a static oven* and heating at a maximum temperature of 250F
until all of the water has evaporated. If an oven is unavailable, the samples may also
be allowed to slowly air dry.
Figure 4.2: Effluent sample is wet sieved by pouring

over a stack of U.S Standard Sieves
Figure 4.3: Water is used to assist the wet sieving process
6) Measure the weight of dry solids captured on each size of sieve screen. These will be
the Weights of Individual Dry Effluent Solids.
* This method applies to water based fluids only. For oil based fluids, proper cleansing and drying of
the sample should be administered in order to extract all residual fluids from the solids
Page 32 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Discard:
1) Weigh the trough that will be used to collect the discard sample.
2) Collect discard sample off end of solids control equipment (see Figure 4.4).
Figure 4.4: Trough used to collect discard sample from solids control equipment
3) Measure the time (in minutes) for which all the discard is collected from the solids
control equipment. This will be the Time of Discard Sample.
4) Weigh the discard sample and trough.
5) Calculate the weight of the discard sample in the trough.

Wet Discard Sample Weight = Discard Sample and Trough – Weight of Trough
6) Wet sieve and dry the sieved solids thoroughly*.
Take a representative sample from the discarded solids and slowly pour through a
stack of U.S. Standard Sieve screens (use the same sizes of sieves used for the
Underflow sample). A gentle stream of water is used to wash the solids and to assist
the sieving process (see Figures 2 and 3). Once the sample has completely passed
through the stack of sieves, each sample of solids on each individual sieve must be
dried. Drying can be accomplished by placing the sample in a static oven* and
heating at a maximum temperature of 250F until all of the water has evaporated. If
an oven is unavailable, the samples may also be allowed to slowly air dry.
Page 33 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
7) Measure the weight of dry solids captured on each size of sieve screen. These will be
the Weights of Individual Dry Discard Solids.
* This method applies to water based fluids only. For oil based fluids, proper cleansing and drying of the
sample should be administered in order to extract all residual fluids from the solids.
Plotting the Cut Point Curve
1. Determine the Wet Discard flow rate.

Wet Discard Flow Rate = Wet Discard Sample Weight / Time of Discard Sample
2. Determine the Effluent flow rate.

Effluent Flow Rate = Well Flow Rate – Wet Discard Flow Rate
3. Calculate the time taken for the Effluent sample.

Effluent Sample Time = Weight of Effluent Sample / Effluent Flow Rate
4. For each U.S. Standard Sieve Size Screen, determine the rate of solids collected on
each screen size for the Discard sample.
Discard Flow Rate =Weight of Individual Dry Discard Solids / Time of Discard Sample
5. For each U.S. Standard Sieve screen, determine the rate of solids collected on each
screen size for the Effluent sample.
Effluent Flow Rate = Weight of Individual Dry Effluent Solids / Effluent Sample Time
6. Determine the Feed Flow rate for each Sieve size.

Feed Flow Rate = Dry Discard Flow Rate + Effluent Flow Rate
7. Calculate the percent of discarded solids for each Sieve size.

Percent of Discard = (Discard Flow Rate / Feed Flow Rate) * 100
8. Plot the Percent of Discard on the “Y” axis with the corresponding Sieve size
(expressed in microns) along the “X” axis of a graph to produce the cut
point curve for the analyzed system. The cut point curve would actually be a
series of horizontal lines between sieve sizes. The curve is usually drawn
through the center of each segment to produce a smooth curve.
Create a shale shaker cut point curve using the following known data:
 Well flow rate = 560 gpm

 Density of feed = 8.90 lb/gal
Page 34 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
 Container used to collect effluent sample = 1.80 lb

 Total effluent sample and container weight = 41.5 lb
 Trough used to collect discard sample = 38.1 lb
 Time to collect the discard sample = 1.00 minute
 Total discard sample and trough weight = 56.5 lb
1. Calculate the mass flow rate of the system = 560 gpm X 8.90 lb/gal = 4984 lb/min.
2. Determine the weight of the effluent sample = 41.5 lb – 1.80 lb = 39.7 lb.
3. After sieving, drying, and weighing the effluent solids, document the individual weights
of the solids on each size sieve.
4. Calculate the weight of the discard sample = 56.5 lb – 38.1 lb = 18.4 lb.
5. After sieving, drying, and weighing the discard solids, record the individual weights of
the solids on each size sieve.
6. Calculate the wet discard flow rate = 18.4 lb ÷ 1.00 minute = 18.4 lb/min.
7. Calculate the effluent flow rate = 4984 lb/min – 18.4 lb/min =4965.6 lb/min
8. Calculate the effluent sample time = 39.7 lb ÷ 4965.6 lb/min = 0.008 minutes
9. Determine the rate of solids collected on each individual sieve size for the discard
sample. Example for 37 micron sieve = 8.80 grams ÷ 1.00 minute = 8.80 grams/minute
10. Determine the rate of solids collected on each individual sieve size for the effluent
sample. Example for 37 micron sieve = 17.7 grams ÷ 0.008 minutes = 2214 grams/minute
11. Determine the feed flow rate for each sieve size. Example for 37 micron sieve = 9
grams/minute + 2214 grams/minute = 2223 grams/minute
12. Calculate the percent of discard solids for each sieve size. Example for 37 micron sieve =
(8.80 grams/minute ÷ 2223 grams/minute) X 100 = 0.40%
Page 35 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Dry Effluent Dry Discard Discard Effluent

Mesh Opening Solids W t. Solids W t. Flow Rate Flow Rate Feed Flow Rate Percent of
Size (m icrons) (gram s) (gram s) (gm /m in) (gm /m in) (gm /m in) Discard
400 37 17.7 8.8 9 2214 2223 0%

325 44 7.1 8.8 9 888 897 1%
270 63 14.2 11.7 12 1776 1788 1%
200 74 10.7 38.1 38 1338 1376 3%
140 105 2.3 85.2 85 288 373 23%
120 118 0.7 339.2 339 88 427 79%
100 140 0.2 550.7 551 25 576 96%
80 177 0.3 1468.0 1468 38 1505 98%
60 234 0 23450.7 23451 0 23451 100%
Individual Dry Solids Weights and Cut Point Curve Calculations
13. Plot the sieve sizes versus the percent discard
Cut Point Curve
100%
90%
Percent o f Solids
80%
Discard ed
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0
50
100
150
200
250
Size: Microns
Graph 4: Cut Point Curve Displays

Separation Potential
Page 36 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
A.7 Qualitative Biweekly Check Sheet

This is the basic check sheet that will be collected biweekly during drilling operations.
Biweekly Check Sheet
Name:____________________
Date:_____________________
Position:__________________
General Performance: Negative---1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ---Positive
Solids Handling Performance: Negative---1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ---Positive
Observed Screen Performance: Negative---1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ---Positive
Ease of Use: Negative---1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ---Positive
Observed Mud Property Impacts: Negative---1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ---Positive
Overall Opinion: Negative---1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ---Positive
Page 37 of 38
Revision Number 000
PNOC-EDC
Appendix B – Mongoose PT Reference Data
Page 38 of 38

PNOC-EDC Mongoose Pre-Test Report Rev - 3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PNOC-EDC Mongoose Pre-Test Report Rev - 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Global Technical Services

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 3

EVALUATION OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................... 4

APPENDIX A– TEST PROCEDURES................................................................................................... 15

Revision: 002 August 18, 2009

Test dates & duration: September 2007 Duration: 64 days

Well name & number: MG-41D

Contractor & rig: PNOC Rig 10

Major service companies: M-I SWACO

Previous tests: No previous evaluation.

M- I SWACO Test Chad Dutel, M-I SWACO ES Capital Sales Manager

Jordan Guillermo, M-I SWACO ES

Mesh Type: Frame Type: Part Number:

Table 2 MG-41D Drilling Parameters

Depth Interval Bit Size Casing Mud Properties

0-101 m 26” 20” Spud Mud

101-703 m 17-1/2” 13-3/8” Low Solids Polymer Mud(Non-

Max Sand Content = 0.3%-0.5%

703-1755m 12-1/4” 9-5/8” Low Solids Polymer Mud (Dispersed)

1755-2800m 8-1/2“ 7-5/8“ Water (Blind Drilling) with Hi-Vis

Evaluation – Operations Integration

Shaker Capacity - Design Benchmark of 600gpm

Screen Life – Recorded Observation of 10% Cell Failure

Shaker Discharge Analysis – Solids Control Efficiency Measurement

Cut Points and Cut Point Curves

When performing motion analysis on the shaker it is important to measure various

Conveyance Velocity – Observed & Recorded Measurement

Maintenance & Consumables

Daily Qualitative Analysis

Appendix A– Test Procedures

A.1 Wet Solids Discharge Mass Flow Rate

Procedure & Analysis

A.2 Wet Solids Discharge Retort Analysis

3) Balance - a top-loading balance capable of weighting up to 2000 grams with a precision of

1) Clean and dry the retort assembly and condenser.

Mass of wet cuttings, Mwc (g) = M2 - M1

If no oil is present, then

Oil retention (% of wet cuttings) = M o/M wc x 100

A.3 Cuttings Density (Bucket Method)

Procedure & Analysis

A.4 Cuttings Transport Velocity

In order to perform this procedure, the following items must be used:

A.5 Motion Analysis System

System Detail and Part Numbers

Data Acquisition Unit

Bi-Axial Accelerometer and Magnetic Base

Main Panel Display

A.6 Screen Life

5) Digital camera (a digital video camera may be used as well).

A.7 Cut Point Analysis

Flow Rate = (cylinder volume * N) (spm) (pump efficiency)

1) Weigh the sampling container. A minimum container size of 5 gallons is

Figure 4.1: Sample is taken directly from the effluent stream

3) Weigh the sampling container and effluent sample.

4) Calculate the weight of the effluent sample

5) Wet sieve and dry the sieved solids thoroughly*.

Figure 4.2: Effluent sample is wet sieved by pouring

Figure 4.3: Water is used to assist the wet sieving process

4) Weigh the discard sample and trough.

5) Calculate the weight of the discard sample in the trough.

6) Wet sieve and dry the sieved solids thoroughly*.

Plotting the Cut Point Curve

1. Determine the Wet Discard flow rate.