CE 513

DESIGN OF COLUMN

DESIGN OF COLUMN

A. General Data: (ASTM Designation)

Fy  450MPa

COLUMN 1 (C-1)
STEEL PROPERTIES:
W24 x 335
kN
m  steel  73.575
g  9.807 3
2 m
s
kg g kN
W B  499.35  4.897
m m

2
A T  63677mm

d  699mm

t w  35.1mm

t f  63mm

b f  343.4mm

3 4
Ix  495315410
( )  mm

3 3
Sx  14172( 10)  mm
3 3
Sy  2497( 10) mm

h  d  2t f  573 mm

E  200000
MPa

Lb  7.4m

rT  92.2mm

rx  279.32mm

ry  82.18mm

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

A.1. Load Resistance Factor

  0.9

A.2. Span of the Girder

Lb  7.4m

A.3. Factored Axial Force

Grasp Results (Nodal Reaction)

Pu  1536.44
kN

A.4. Factored Moment

Grasp Results

M x  244.28kN m

M y  174.55kN m

2 2
Mu  Mx  My

M u  300.234kN
 m

A.5. Effective Length Factor

Kf  0.65

B. Slender or Non Slender (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Uniform compression in flanges bf

3
of rolled I-Shaped sections.  f   2.725
2tf

Uniform compression in webs h

10 of doubly symmetric I-Shaped  w   16.325
tw
Sections.

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

B.1 Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios E  200000 Fy  450

E
Stiffened  fs  0.56  11.806
Fy

E
Unstiffened  fu  1.49  31.412
Fy

B.2 Slenderness - Ratio SR is the larger value of SRx and SRy

Kf  Lb
SRx 
rx

SRx  17.22

Kf  Lb
SRy 
ry

SRy  58.53

SR  SRy  58.53

B.3 Flexural Buckling Stress

The condition below must be compute inorder to so solve Fcr

Condition 1

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

E
4.71  99.296
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Using Euler critical stress

E  200000MPa Fy  450MPa

2
 E
Fe 
2
SR

Fe  576.198MPa

 Fy 
 
 Fe 
Fcr1   0.658  Fy

Fcr1  324.527MPa

Condition 2

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

Fcr2  0.877Fe

Fcr2  505.326MPa

E
since, SR  4.71
Fy

Fcr  Fcr1

Fcr  324.527MPa

B.4 Nominal Compressive Strength for Flexural Buckling

Cross Section Area of the Steel,
2
A T  63677mm

Pn  Fcr  A T  20664.882kN

  0.9

  Pn  18598.394kN

Pu  1536.44kN

  Pn  Pu

OK!

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

C. Check for Combined Axial and Bending Stress

C.1 Determine if it is Small Axial Compression or Large Axial Compression

Case 1

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

Case 2

fa
When is > 0.15
Fa

use,

Stability Interaction Criterion

fa Cmx fbx Cmy fby

   1.0
Fa  fa   fa 
1  F 1  F
Fex bx Fey by
   

Strength Interaction Criterion

fa fbx fby
   1.0
0.60Fy Fbx Fby

Actual Axial Stress

Pu
fa 
AT

fa  24.129MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Allowable Axial Force

   Pn
Fa 
AT

Fa  292.074MPa

fa
 0.083
Fa

Case 1 satisfy!

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

use,
fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

C.2. Compact or Non Compact (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Flexure in flanges of rolled bf

1  f   2.725
I-Shaped sections and 2tf
channels.

Flexure in web of doubly h

9 symmetric I-Shaped sections  w   16.325
tw
and channels.

Compact E  200000 Fy  450 Non-Compact

E E
 f1  0.38  8.011  f2  1.0  21.082
Fy Fy

E E
 w1  3.76  79.268  w2  5.7  120.167
Fy Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fy  450
COMPUTING THE Lc

2 E  200000
Af  bf  tf  21634.2mm


Lc = smaller value of
137900
200b f
and  d F
Fy A  y
 f

200b f 137900
 9.485m
 3.238m  d F
Fy A  y
 f

Lc  3.238m

Lb  7.4m

Lb  Lc

MEMBERS WITH COMPACT SECTION WITH Lb > Lc

Lb  7.4m

Lc  3.238m

When 703270Cb Lb 3516330

Cb
 
Fy rT Fy

When the bending moment at any point of the unbraced length is larger than both ends of this length
then, Cb  1.0

703270
Cb
 39.533
Fy

Lb
 80.26
rT 39.533 80.26 88.397

OK!
3516330
Cb
 88.397
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS IN COMPRESSION

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy

  Lb  
2

Fy   
 
2
Fb1   
 rT    F
y
 3 10.55( 10) 6 C 
 b

Fb1  176.356

Fb1 = 176.36 MPa

82740Cb
Fb3 
 Lb  d 
 
 Af 

Fb3  346.057

Fb3 = 346.057 MPa

Fb  0.60 Fy  270

Fb = 270 MPa

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy, therefore use

Fb = Fb1 176.36 MPa

Therefore the allowable stress in compression,

Fb1  Fb Fy  450MPa

Fb  176.36MPa

Fbx  Fb

Fbx  176.36MPa

D.1. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fby  0.75Fy

Fby  337.5MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D.2. Actual Bending Stress About Major and Minor Axis 3

Sx  14172000mm

Mx 3
Sy  2497000mm
fbx 
Sx
Mx  244.28kN m
fbx  17.237MPa
My  174.55kN m

My
fby 
Sy

fby  69.904MPa

E. Small Axial Compression

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

fa fbx fby
   0.387
Fa Fbx Fby

Since 0.387  1.0therefore,

The Design Section is Adequate

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

DESIGN OF COLUMN

A. General Data: (ASTM Designation)

Fy  450MPa

COLUMN 2 (C-2)
STEEL PROPERTIES:
W21 x 275
kN
m  steel  73.575
g  9.807 3
2 m
s
kg g kN
W B  410.04  4.021
m m

2
A T  52129mm

d  612.9mm

t w  31mm

t f  55.6mm

b f  327.4mm

3 4
Ix  3171683( 10)  mm

3 3
Sx  10350( 10)  mm
3 3
Sy  1996( 10) mm

h  d  2t f  501.7mm


E  200000MPa

Lb  7.4m

rT  88.39mm

rx  246.66mm

ry  79.17mm

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

A.1. Load Resistance Factor

  0.9

A.2. Span of the Girder

Lb  7.4m

A.3. Factored Axial Force

Grasp Results (Nodal Reaction)

Pu  1394.54k N

A.4. Factored Moment

Grasp Results

M x  243.48kN m

M y  118.33kN m

2 2
Mu  Mx  My

M u  270.711kN
 m

A.5. Effective Length Factor

Kf  0.65

B. Slender or Non Slender (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Uniform compression in flanges bf

3 of rolled I-Shaped sections.  f   2.944
2tf

Uniform compression in webs h

10 of doubly symmetric I-Shaped  w   16.184
tw
Sections.

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

B.1 Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios E  200000 Fy  450

E
Stiffened  fs  0.56  11.806
Fy

E
Unstiffened  fu  1.49  31.412
Fy

B.2 Slenderness - Ratio SR is the larger value of SRx and SRy

Kf  Lb
SRx 
rx

SRx  19.501

Kf  Lb
SRy 
ry

SRy  60.755

SR  SRy  60.755

B.3 Flexural Buckling Stress

The condition below must be compute inorder to so solve Fcr

Condition 1

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

E
4.71  99.296
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Using Euler critical stress

E  200000MPa Fy  450MPa

2
 E
Fe 
2
SR

Fe  534.762MPa

 Fy 
 
 Fe 
Fcr1   0.658  Fy

Fcr1  316.41MPa

Condition 2

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

Fcr2  0.877Fe

Fcr2  468.987MPa

E
since, SR  4.71
Fy

Fcr  Fcr1

Fcr  316.41MPa

B.4 Nominal Compressive Strength for Flexural Buckling

Cross Section Area of the Steel,
2
A T  52129mm

Pn  Fcr  A T  16494.147kN

  0.9

  Pn  14844.733kN

Pu  1394.54kN

  Pn  Pu

OK!

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

C. Check for Combined Axial and Bending Stress

C.1 Determine if it is Small Axial Compression or Large Axial Compression

Case 1

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

Case 2

fa
When is > 0.15
Fa

use,

Stability Interaction Criterion

fa Cmx fbx Cmy fby

   1.0
Fa  
fa  fa 
1  F 1  F
Fex bx Fey by
   

Strength Interaction Criterion

fa fbx fby
   1.0
0.60Fy Fbx Fby

Actual Axial Stress

Pu
fa 
AT

fa  26.752MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Allowable Axial Force

   Pn
Fa 
AT

Fa  284.769MPa

fa
 0.094
Fa

Case 1 satisfy!

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

use,
fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

C.2. Compact or Non Compact (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Flexure in flanges of rolled bf

1  f   2.944
I-Shaped sections and 2tf
channels.

Flexure in web of doubly h

9 symmetric I-Shaped sections  w   16.184
tw
and channels.

Compact E  200000 Fy  450 Non-Compact

E E
 f1  0.38  8.011  f2  1.0  21.082
Fy Fy

E E
 w1  3.76  79.268  w2  5.7  120.167
Fy Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fy  450
COMPUTING THE Lc

2 E  200000
Af  b f  tf  18203.44mm


Lc = smaller value of
137900
200b f
and  d F
Fy A  y
 f

200b f 137900
 9.102m
 3.087m  d F
Fy A  y
 f

Lc  3.087m

Lb  7.4m

Lb  Lc

MEMBERS WITH COMPACT SECTION WITH Lb > Lc

Lb  7.4m

Lc  3.087m

When 703270Cb Lb 3516330Cb

 
Fy rT Fy

When the bending moment at any point of the unbraced length is larger than both ends of this length
then, Cb  1.0

703270
Cb
 39.533
Fy

Lb
 83.72
rT 39.533 83.72 88.397

OK!
3516330
Cb
 88.397
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS IN COMPRESSION

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy

  Lb  
2

Fy   
 
2
Fb1   
 rT    F
y
 3 10.55( 10) 6 C 
 b

Fb1  165.467

Fb1 = 165.47 MPa

82740Cb
Fb3 
 Lb  d 
 A 
 f 

Fb3  332.084

Fb3 = 332.084 MPa

Fb  0.60 Fy  270

Fb = 270 MPa

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy, therefore use

Fb = Fb1 165.47 MPa

Therefore the allowable stress in compression,

Fb1  Fb Fy  450MPa

Fb  165.47MPa

Fbx  Fb

Fbx  165.47MPa

D.1. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fby  0.75Fy

Fby  337.5MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D.2. Actual Bending Stress About Major and Minor Axis 3

Sx  10350000mm

Mx 3
Sy  1996000mm
fbx 
Sx
Mx  243.48kN m
fbx  23.525MPa
My  118.33kN m

My
fby 
Sy

fby  59.284MPa

E. Small Axial Compression

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

fa fbx fby
   0.412
Fa Fbx Fby

Since 0.412  1.0therefore,

The Design Section is Adequate

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

DESIGN OF COLUMN

A. General Data: (ASTM Designation)

Fy  450MPa

COLUMN 3 (C-3)
STEEL PROPERTIES:
W21 x 182
kN
m  steel  73.575
g  9.807 3
2 m
s
kg g kN
W B  272.01  2.668
m m

2
A T  34581mm

d  577.1mm

t w  21.1mm

t f  37.6mm

b f  317.5mm

3 4
Ix  196877510
( )  mm

3 3
Sx  6823( 10)  mm
3 3
Sy  1266( 10) mm

h  d  2t f  501.9mm


E  200000MPa

Lb  7.4m

rT  85.34mm

rx  238.6mm

ry  76.25mm

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

A.1. Load Resistance Factor

  0.9

A.2. Span of the Girder

Lb  7.4m

A.3. Factored Axial Force

Grasp Results

Pu  1394.26
kN

A.4. Factored Moment

Grasp Results

M x  168.91kN m

M y  117.6kN m

2 2
Mu  Mx  My

M u  205.816kN
 m

A.5. Effective Length Factor

Kf  0.65

B. Slender or Non Slender (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Uniform compression in flanges bf

3 of rolled I-Shaped sections.  f   4.222
2tf

Uniform compression in webs h

10 of doubly symmetric I-Shaped  w   23.787
tw
Sections.

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

B.1 Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios E  200000 Fy  450

E
Stiffened  fs  0.56  11.806
Fy

E
Unstiffened  fu  1.49  31.412
Fy

B.2 Slenderness - Ratio SR is the larger value of SRx and SRy

Kf  Lb
SRx 
rx

SRx  20.159

Kf  Lb
SRy 
ry

SRy  63.082

SR  SRy  63.082

B.3 Flexural Buckling Stress

The condition below must be compute inorder to so solve Fcr

Condition 1

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

E
4.71  99.296
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Using Euler critical stress

E  200000MPa Fy  450MPa

2
 E
Fe 
2
SR

Fe  496.043MPa

 Fy 
 
 Fe 
Fcr1   0.658  Fy

Fcr1  307.83MPa

Condition 2

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

Fcr2  0.877Fe

Fcr2  435.03MPa

E
since, SR  4.71
Fy

Fcr  Fcr1

Fcr  307.83MPa

B.4 Nominal Compressive Strength for Flexural Buckling

Cross Section Area of the Steel,
2
A T  34581mm

Pn  Fcr  A T  10645.065kN

  0.9

  Pn  9580.559kN

Pu  1394.26kN

  Pn  Pu

OK!

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

C. Check for Combined Axial and Bending Stress

C.1 Determine if it is Small Axial Compression or Large Axial Compression

Case 1

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

Case 2

fa
When is > 0.15
Fa

use,

Stability Interaction Criterion

fa Cmx fbx Cmy fby

   1.0
Fa  fa  fa 
1  F 1  F
Fex bx Fey by
   

Strength Interaction Criterion

fa fbx fby
   1.0
0.60Fy Fbx Fby

Actual Axial Stress

Pu
fa 
AT

fa  40.319MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Allowable Axial Force

   Pn
Fa 
AT

Fa  277.047MPa

fa
 0.146
Fa

Case 1 satisfy!

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

use,
fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

C.2. Compact or Non Compact (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Flexure in flanges of rolled bf

1  f   4.222
I-Shaped sections and 2tf
channels.

Flexure in web of doubly h

9 symmetric I-Shaped sections  w   23.787
tw
and channels.

Compact E  200000 Fy  450 Non-Compact

E E
 f1  0.38  8.011  f2  1.0  21.082
Fy Fy

E E
 w1  3.76  79.268  w2  5.7  120.167
Fy Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fy  450
COMPUTING THE Lc

2 E  200000
Af  b f  tf  11938mm


Lc = smaller value of
137900
200b f
and  d F
Fy A  y
 f

200b f 137900
 6.339m
 2.993m  d F
Fy A  y
 f

Lc  2.993m

Lb  7.4m

Lb  Lc

MEMBERS WITH COMPACT SECTION WITH Lb > Lc

Lb  7.4m

Lc  2.993m

When 703270Cb Lb 3516330Cb

 
Fy rT Fy

When the bending moment at any point of the unbraced length is larger than both ends of this length
then, Cb  1.0

703270Cb
 39.533
Fy

Lb
 86.712
rT 39.533 86.712 88.397

OK!
3516330Cb
 88.397
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS IN COMPRESSION

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy

  Lb  
2

Fy   
 rT 
Fb1   2

    Fy
 3 10.55( 10) 6 C 
 b

Fb1  155.679

Fb1 = 155.68 MPa

82740Cb
Fb3 
 Lb  d 
 
 Af 

Fb3  231.294

Fb3 = 231.29 MPa

Fb  0.60 Fy  270

Fb = 270 MPa

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy, therefore use

Fb = Fb1 155.68 MPa

Therefore the allowable stress in compression,

Fb1  Fb Fy  450MPa

Fb  155.68MPa

Fbx  Fb

Fbx  155.68MPa

D.1. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fby  0.75Fy

Fby  337.5MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D.2. Actual Bending Stress About Major and Minor Axis 3

Sx  6823000mm

Mx 3
Sy  1266000mm
fbx 
Sx
Mx  168.91kN m
fbx  24.756MPa
M y  117.6kN m

My
fby 
Sy

fby  92.891MPa

E. Small Axial Compression

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

fa fbx fby
   0.58
Fa Fbx Fby

Since 0.580  1.0therefore,

The Design Section is Adequate

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

DESIGN OF COLUMN

A. General Data: (ASTM Designation)

Fy  450MPa

COLUMN 1a (C-1')
STEEL PROPERTIES:
W21 x 223
kN
m  steel  73.575
g  9.807 3
2 m
s
kg g kN
W B  331.88  3.255
m m

2
A T  42193mm

d  593.1mm

t w  25.4mm

t f  45.5mm

b f  321.9mm

3 4
Ix  247657710
( )  mm

3 3
Sx  8351( 10)  mm
3 3
Sy  1575( 10) mm

h  d  2t f  502.1mm


E  200000MPa

Lb  7.4m

rT  86.61mm

rx  242.27mm

ry  77.51mm

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

A.1. Load Resistance Factor

  0.9

A.2. Span of the Girder

Lb  7.4m

A.3. Factored Axial Force

Grasp Results

Pu  1397.84k N

A.4. Factored Moment

Grasp Results

M x  389.13kN m

M y  118.33kN m

2 2
Mu  Mx  My

M u  406.724kN
 m

A.5. Effective Length Factor

Kf  0.65

B. Slender or Non Slender (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Uniform compression in flanges bf

3 of rolled I-Shaped sections.  f   3.537
2tf

Uniform compression in webs h

10 of doubly symmetric I-Shaped  w   19.768
tw
Sections.

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

B.1 Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios E  200000 Fy  450

E
Stiffened  fs  0.56  11.806
Fy

E
Unstiffened  fu  1.49  31.412
Fy

B.2 Slenderness - Ratio SR is the larger value of SRx and SRy

Kf  Lb
SRx 
rx

SRx  19.854

Kf  Lb
SRy 
ry

SRy  62.057

SR  SRy  62.057

B.3 Flexural Buckling Stress

The condition below must be compute inorder to so solve Fcr

Condition 1

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

E
4.71  99.296
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Using Euler critical stress

E  200000MPa Fy  450MPa

2
 E
Fe 
2
SR

Fe  512.572MPa

 Fy 
 
 Fe 
Fcr1   0.658  Fy

Fcr1  311.622MPa

Condition 2

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

Fcr2  0.877Fe

Fcr2  449.526MPa

E
since, SR  4.71
Fy

Fcr  Fcr1

Fcr  311.622MPa

B.4 Nominal Compressive Strength for Flexural Buckling

Cross Section Area of the Steel,
2
A T  42193mm

Pn  Fcr  A T  13148.278kN

  0.9

  Pn  11833.45kN

Pu  1397.84kN

  Pn  Pu

OK!

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

C. Check for Combined Axial and Bending Stress

C.1 Determine if it is Small Axial Compression or Large Axial Compression

Case 1

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

Case 2

fa
When is > 0.15
Fa

use,

Stability Interaction Criterion

fa Cmx fbx Cmy fby

   1.0
Fa  fa  fa 
1  F 1  F
Fex bx Fey by
   

Strength Interaction Criterion

fa fbx fby
   1.0
0.60Fy Fbx Fby

Actual Axial Stress

Pu
fa 
AT

fa  33.13MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Allowable Axial Force

   Pn
Fa 
AT

Fa  280.46MPa

fa
 0.118
Fa

Case 1 satisfy!

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

use,
fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

C.2. Compact or Non Compact (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Flexure in flanges of rolled bf

1  f   3.537
I-Shaped sections and 2tf
channels.

Flexure in web of doubly h

9 symmetric I-Shaped sections  w   19.768
tw
and channels.

Compact E  200000 Fy  450 Non-Compact

E E
 f1  0.38  8.011  f2  1.0  21.082
Fy Fy

E E
 w1  3.76  79.268  w2  5.7  120.167
Fy Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fy  450
COMPUTING THE Lc

2 E  200000
Af  b f  tf  14646.45mm


Lc = smaller value of
137900
200b f
and  d F
Fy A  y
 f

200b f 137900
 7.568m
 3.035m  d F
Fy A  y
 f

Lc  3.035m

Lb  7.4m

Lb  Lc

MEMBERS WITH COMPACT SECTION WITH Lb > Lc

Lb  7.4m

Lc  3.035m

When 703270Cb Lb 3516330Cb

 
Fy rT Fy

When the bending moment at any point of the unbraced length is larger than both ends of this length
then, Cb  1.0

703270Cb
 39.533
Fy

Lb
 85.44
rT 39.533 85.44 88.397

OK!
3516330Cb
 88.397
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS IN COMPRESSION

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy

  Lb  
2

Fy   
 
2
Fb1   
 rT    F
y
 3 10.55( 10) 6 C 
 b

Fb1  159.88

Fb1 = 159.88 MPa

82740Cb
Fb3 
 Lb  d 
 
 Af 

Fb3  276.114

Fb3 = 276.114 MPa

Fb  0.60 Fy  270

Fb = 270 MPa

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy, therefore use

Fb = Fb1 159.88 MPa

Therefore the allowable stress in compression,

Fb1  Fb Fy  450MPa

Fb  159.88MPa

Fbx  Fb

Fbx  159.88MPa

D.1. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fby  0.75Fy

Fby  337.5MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D.2. Actual Bending Stress About Major and Minor Axis 3

Sx  8351000mm

Mx 3
Sy  1575000mm
fbx 
Sx
Mx  389.13kN m
fbx  46.597MPa
My  118.33kN m

My
fby 
Sy

fby  75.13MPa

E. Small Axial Compression

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

fa fbx fby
   0.632
Fa Fbx Fby

Since 0.632  1.0therefore,

The Design Section is Adequate

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

DESIGN OF COLUMN

A. General Data: (ASTM Designation)

Fy  450MPa

COLUMN 2a (C-2')
STEEL PROPERTIES:
W21 x 182
kN
m  steel  73.575
g  9.807 3
2 m
s
kg g kN
W B  272.01  
m m

2
A T  34581mm

d  577.1mm

t w  21.1mm

t f  37.6mm

b f  317.5mm

3 4
Ix  196877510
( )  mm

3 3
Sx  6823( 10)  mm
3 3
Sy  1266( 10) mm

h  d  2t f  501.9mm


E  200000MPa

Lb  7.4m

rT  85.34mm

rx  238.6mm

ry  76.25mm

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

A.1. Load Resistance Factor

  0.9

A.2. Span of the Girder

Lb  7.4m

A.3. Factored Axial Force

Grasp Results

Pu  1402.16k N

A.4. Factored Moment

Grasp Results

M x  242.48kN m

M y  118.33kN m

2 2
Mu  Mx  My

M u  269.812kN
 m

A.5. Effective Length Factor

Kf  0.65

B. Slender or Non Slender (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Uniform compression in flanges bf

3 of rolled I-Shaped sections.  f   4.222
2tf

Uniform compression in webs h

10 of doubly symmetric I-Shaped  w   23.787
tw
Sections.

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

B.1 Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios E  200000 Fy  450

E
Stiffened  fs  0.56  11.806
Fy

E
Unstiffened  fu  1.49  31.412
Fy

B.2 Slenderness - Ratio SR is the larger value of SRx and SRy

Kf  Lb
SRx 
rx

SRx  20.159

Kf  Lb
SRy 
ry

SRy  63.082

SR  SRy  63.082

B.3 Flexural Buckling Stress

The condition below must be compute inorder to so solve Fcr

Condition 1

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

E
4.71  99.296
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Using Euler critical stress

E  200000MPa Fy  450MPa

2
 E
Fe 
2
SR

Fe  496.043MPa

 Fy 
 
 Fe 
Fcr1   0.658  Fy

Fcr1  307.83MPa

Condition 2

E
when SR  4.71 then
Fy

Fcr2  0.877Fe

Fcr2  435.03MPa

E
since, SR  4.71
Fy

Fcr  Fcr1

Fcr  307.83MPa

B.4 Nominal Compressive Strength for Flexural Buckling

Cross Section Area of the Steel,
2
A T  34581mm

Pn  Fcr  A T  10645.065kN

  0.9

  Pn  9580.559kN

Pu  1402.16kN

  Pn  Pu

OK!

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

C. Check for Combined Axial and Bending Stress

C.1 Determine if it is Small Axial Compression or Large Axial Compression

Case 1

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

Case 2

fa
When is > 0.15
Fa

use,

Stability Interaction Criterion

fa Cmx fbx Cmy fby

   1.0
Fa  fa   fa 
1  F 1  F
Fex bx Fey by
   

Strength Interaction Criterion

fa fbx fby
   1.0
0.60Fy Fbx Fby

Actual Axial Stress

Pu
fa 
AT

fa  40.547MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

Allowable Axial Force

   Pn
Fa 
AT

Fa  277.047MPa

fa
 0.146
Fa

Case 1 satisfy!

When fa is < 0.15

Fa

use,
fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

C.2. Compact or Non Compact (Built Up Section)

Base on Table 502.4.1.NSCP 2010

Case Description of Elements Width - Thickness Ratio

Flexure in flanges of rolled bf

1  f   4.222
I-Shaped sections and 2tf
channels.

Flexure in web of doubly h

9 symmetric I-Shaped sections  w   23.787
tw
and channels.

Compact E  200000 Fy  450 Non-Compact

E E
 f1  0.38  8.011  f2  1.0  21.082
Fy Fy

E E
 w1  3.76  79.268  w2  5.7  120.167
Fy Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fy  450
COMPUTING THE Lc

2 E  200000
Af  b f  tf  11938mm


Lc = smaller value of
137900
200b f
and  d F
Fy A  y
 f

200b f 137900
 6.339m
 2.993m  d F
Fy A  y
 f

Lc  2.993m

Lb  7.4m

Lb  Lc

MEMBERS WITH COMPACT SECTION WITH Lb > Lc

Lb  7.4m

Lc  2.993m

When 703270Cb Lb 3516330Cb

 
Fy rT Fy

When the bending moment at any point of the unbraced length is larger than both ends of this length
then, Cb  1.0

703270Cb
 39.533
Fy

Lb
 86.712
rT 39.533 86.712 88.397

OK!
3516330Cb
 88.397
Fy

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS IN COMPRESSION

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy

  Lb  
2

Fy   
 
2
Fb1   
 rT    F
y
 3 10.55( 10) 6 C 
 b

Fb1  155.679

Fb1 = 155.68 MPa

82740Cb
Fb3 
 Lb  d 
 
 Af 

Fb3  231.294

Fb3 = 231.29 MPa

Fb  0.60 Fy  270

Fb = 270 MPa

Fb = Larger than (Fb1 and Fb3) < 0.60Fy, therefore use

Fb = Fb1 155.68 MPa

Therefore the allowable stress in compression,

Fb1  Fb Fy  450MPa

Fb  155.68MPa

Fbx  Fb

Fbx  155.68MPa

D.1. Allowable Bending Stress About Major Axis

Fby  0.75Fy

Fby  337.5MPa

X
CE 513
DESIGN OF COLUMN

D.2. Actual Bending Stress About Major and Minor Axis 3

Sx  6823000mm

Mx 3
Sy  1266000mm
fbx 
Sx
Mx  242.48kN m
fbx  35.539MPa
My  118.33kN m

My
fby 
Sy

fby  93.468MPa

E. Small Axial Compression

fa fbx fby
   1.0
Fa Fbx Fby

fa fbx fby
   0.652
Fa Fbx Fby

Since 0.580  1.0therefore,

The Design Section is Adequate