Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5m clear dimensions
0.45m
4.50m
4.975m
0.50m
6.00m
0.50m
6.50m
(earth fill+W.C)
1 in 1
1.55m Earth Pressure
Water
Pressure
(Dry soil pr.) (Submerged soil pr.)
5.2 Dimensions of the structure for the STAAD model
The structure is idealised in STAAD. Pro as shown below. The lengths of the members have
been considered from centre to centre. The width of the structure has been considered as 1m.
6.50m
(c/c) 4.98m
(c/c)
A B C D E F
2 2 2
47.5 kN/m 67.50 kN/m 23.75 kN/m
Dry earth 12.0 kN/m
2
43.750 kN/m
2
Pressure
6.1 Dead Loads Load
Submerged
Self weight Top slab =0.45×1×25 = 11.25 kN/m soil Pressure
Bottom slab =0.50×1×25 = 12.50 kN/m
Side wall =0.50×4.5×25 = 56.250 kN
6.2 SIDL
Load due to W/C =(0.1×1)×22 2.2 kN/m
Load due to fill =(1.55-0.065)×20×(1-0.30) 20.79 kN/m
Weight of Parapet wall =0.3×(1.55+0.6)×25 16.13 kN/m
6.3 Surcharge live load
Surcharge live load is considered to be equivalent to 1.2 m of earth fill (As per IRC-6-2010 cl:217.1)
2
= 0.50 * 20 * 1.2 = 12 kN/m
6.4 Earth pressure:
Load intensity due to Earth Pressure, = Ka .γ . h
2
At top slab level,
=0.500×20×1.775 = 17.75 kN/m
2
At bottom level,=0.500×20×6.750 = 67.50 kN/m
6.5 Water and soil Pressure (During HFL) :
Load intensity due to Water Pressure, = γ.h
2
Acting Downward on bottom Slab, = 45.00 kN/m
2
At HFL top level, = 0.00 kN/m
2
At C-L of Bottom slab level, = 47.50 kN/m
Load intensity due to submerged Pressure,
2
Submerged soil pressure at bottom, = 23.75 kN/m
Note:- Water pressure inside and outside will balance each other and hence not to be
considered, but the earth fill outside will be submerged up to a height of HFL level. So the
submerged earth pressure is considered during the HFL condition.
6.6 Live Load
6.6.1 Case 1: IRC 70R - Tracked Vehicle
1.20 0.30
(a). LL Position for Maximum B.M:
3.250
6.50 C/C
4.57
2.06
6.50
Total load = 700 kN
Along traffic direction:
Dispersion of loads through fill is taken as 1:1
Effective length of the load =4.57+2×(1.550+0.45) = 8.57 m
Total length of the span (C/C) = 6.50 m
Along transverse direction:
Effective Width of the load is computed using the formula
(as per IRC : 21 Cl 305.16)
beff = k * X (1 - X/L) + bw
(b/ l0 ) =13.2/6.00 = 2.2
X =6.50/2 = 3.25 m
bw =0.84+2×(1.550) = 3.94 m
k = 2.60
beff = k * X (1 - X/L) + bw
beff =2.600×3.25×(1-3.25/6.00)+3.94 = 7.813 m
Actual effective width = 7.813 m
7.813/2>2.06 /2, Therefore overlapping due to dispersion occurs in transverse direction
Load to be considered = 700 kN
Since (7.81/2)>(0.30+1.2+(0.84/2))
2.000
0.84
Parapet wall
4.285
4.57
6.50 C/C
2.22
2.06
12.56 kN/m2
6.50
Parapet wall
2.640
0.86
6.50 C/C
200 kN 0.263
1.22
200 kN
2.640
1.93
2
3.25 11.75 kN/m
6.50
Total load = 400 kN
Along traffic direction:
Dispersion of loads through fill is taken as 1:1
Effective length of the load =1.22+0.26+2×(1.55+0.45) = 5.48 m
Total length of the span (C/C) = 6.50 m
Along transverse direction:
Effective Width of the load is computed using the formula
(as per IRC : 21 Cl 305.16)
beff = k * X (1 - X/L) + bw
(b/ l0 ) =13.2/6.00 = 2.2
X =(6.50-1.22)/2 = 2.64 m
bw =0.86+2×(1.550) = 3.96 m
k = 2.60
beff = k * X (1- X/L) + bw
beff =2.600×2.64×(1-2.64/6.00)+3.96 = 7.80 m
Actual eff width = 7.80 m
7.804 /2>1.93/2Therefore overlapping due to dispersion occurs in transverse direction
Load to be considered = 400 kN
Since (7.80/2)>0.30+1.2+(0.86/2)
Net effective width of dispersion = 7.76 m
=0.30+1.2+(0.86/2)+1.93+(7.80/2)
Load intensity =400/(7.76×5.48) = 9.40 kN/m2
Impact factor = 25.0 %
As per IRC-6-2010, cl:208.3
Load intensity with impact = 11.75 kN/m2
Braking Force
As per IRC-6-2010, cl:211.2, =(20/100)×9.399×(5.48) = 10.31 kN/m
20% of LL (without imapct)
0.86
200 kN 0.263 W1
1.22
200 kN W2
C/C
1.93
6.50
3.149
11.83 kN/m2
6.50
Since the Load W1 and W2 are placed unsymmetry about the span, the distance of the load
from the nearest support X1 & X2 is calculated seperately for W1 and W2 respectively as follows,
For Load W1,
X1 =1.550+0.45+(0.26/2) = 2.132 m
bw =0.86+2×(1.550) = 3.96 m
k = 2.60
beff 1 = k * X (1- X/L) + bw
beff 1 =2.600×2.1315×(1-2.1315/6.00)+3.96 = 7.53 m
Actual eff width for Load W1, = 7.53 m
7.533/2>1.93/2 Therefore overlapping due to dispersion occurs in transverse direction
Since (7.53/2)>(0.30+1.2+(0.86/2))
Net effective width of dispersion for W1, b1 = 7.63 m
=0.30+1.2+(0.86/2)+1.93+(7.53/2)
For Load W2,
X2 =6.50-3.352 = 3.149 m
bw =0.86+2×(1.550) = 3.96 m
k = 2.60
beff 2 = k * X (1- X/L) + bw
beff 2 =2.60×3.149×(1-3.149/6.00)+3.96 = 7.85 m
Actual eff width for Load W2, = 7.85 m
7.85 /2>1.93/2 Therefore overlapping due to dispersion occurs in transverse direction
Since (7.85/2)>(0.30+1.2+(0.86/2))
Net effective width of dispersion for W2, b2 = 7.79 m
=0.30+1.2+(0.86/2)+1.93+(7.85/2)
Load to be considered = 400 kN
Load intensity =400/42.25 = 9.47 kN/m2
Impact factor = 25.0 %
As per IRC-6-2010, cl:208.3
Load intensity with impact = 11.83 kN/m2
Braking Force
As per IRC-6-2010, cl:211.2, =(20/100)×9.467×(5.48) = 10.38 kN/m
20% of LL (without imapct)
6.6.3 Case 3 : IRC Class A load
(a). LL Position for Maximum B.M: 0.15 0.30
Parapet wall
2.65
C/C
0.50
114 kN
6.50
0.25
1.20
114 kN
1.80
2.65
6.50
0.50
0.25 114 kN W1
1.20
W2
6.50 C/C
114 kN
1.80
3.18
Parapet wall
9.23 kN/m2
6.50
Since the Load W1 and W2 are placed unsymmetry about the span, the distance of the load
from the nearest support X1 & X2 is calculated seperately for W1 and W2 respectively as follows,
For Load W1,
X1 =1.550+0.45+(0.25/2) = 2.125 m
bw =0.50+2×(1.550) = 3.6 m
k = 2.60
beff 1 = k * X (1- X/L) + bw
beff 1 =2.600×2.125×(1-2.125/6.00)+3.6 = 7.17 m
Actual eff width for Load W1, = 7.17 m
7.168/2>1.8/2 Therefore overlapping due to dispersion occurs in transverse direction
Since (7.17/2)>0.30+0.15+(0.50/2)
Net effective width of dispersion for W1, b1 = 6.08 m
=0.30+1.2+(0.86/2)+1.93+(7.17/2)
For Load W2,
X2 =6.50-3.325 = 3.175 m
bw =0.50+2×(1.550) = 3.6 m
k = 2.60
beff 2 = k * X (1- X/L) + bw
beff 2 =2.60×3.175×(1-3.175/6.00)+3.6 = 7.49 m
Actual eff width for Load W2, = 7.49 m
7.487 /2>1.8/2 Therefore overlapping due to dispersion occurs in transverse direction
Since (7.49/2)>0.30+0.15+(0.50/2)
Net effective width of dispersion for W2, b2 = 6.24 m
=0.30+1.2+(0.86/2)+1.93+(7.49/2)
17.75 17.75
47.50 kN/m
45.00 kN/m
4 5 6
7
8
11
9
10
1 2 3