Sea Food Basanapute - Report

10PROJECT NAME CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING PROJECT NO.
210926
CENTER, CHATRAPUR, GANJAM
STRUCTURAL M/S. MARUTHI STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION REV. NO. R0
CONSULTANT
PT
UTRACON STRUCTURES PVT. LTD. REV. DATE 31/07/21
CONSULTANT
PREPARED BY VIMAL REVIEWED BY RVR APPROVED BY SEELAM Page | 1
STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATION
PROJECT NAME : CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING CENTER

SEAFOOD BASANAPUTE CHATRAPUR ,GANJAM
CLIENT : M/S INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION (IDCO) BHUBANESWAR.
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT : M/S MARUTHI STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION

CELL, BHUBANESWAR
PT CONSULTANT : M/S UTRACON INDIA STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

PVT LTD, CHENNAI.
REVISION NO. : R0
REVISION DATE : JULY 31, 2021

10PROJECT NAME CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING PROJECT NO. 210926
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
CONTENTS:
1. DESIGN BASIS REPORT
2. SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT
3. PILE CAP CALCULATION
4. COLUMN CALCULATION
5. PT BEAM AND SLAB CALCULATION

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
DESIGN BASIS REPORT

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS & DESIGN
PROJECT NAME : CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING CENTER SEAFOOD
PROJECT NO. : 210962
CLIENT : INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT: MARUTHI STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION

CELL, BHUBANESWAR
REVISION NO. : R0
REVISION DATE : JULY 31, 2021
PREPARED BY : VIMAL
CHECKED BY : RVR
APPROVED BY : SEELAM
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
1. INTRODUCTION:
M/S. Maruthi Structural Construction Cell has proposed to develop a Seafood primary
processing center at Chatrapur, Ganjam.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The Proposed building is approximately 9.0m height (Ground + 1 Storey + Terrace); having a plan
dimension of 33.48m x 20.95m. First Floor is 6m height from ground floor and Terrace Floor is 3.0m
height.
3. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM:
3.1. SUB STRUCTURE:
3.1.1. GEO TECHNICAL DATA:
The structural design of the foundations shall be on the basis of recommendation provided by M/S
Chiefbuild Consultants pvt ltd (Refer Annexure-1).
Regular end bearing and Friction piles of 15m length resting on Silty sand with capacity of 76tonne is
adopted for design.
Ground water table is at 2.5m below the existing ground level.
3.1.2. FOUNDATION:
End bearing pile of 500mm dia with 15m length having axial capacity of 76T and Lateral capacity of
3.28T is adopted.
3.2. SUPER STRUCTURE:
The Structure proposed for Sea food building is of cast in-situ concrete construction with columns, RC
Beams, RC slabs, PT Slab and PT Beam.
As Bhubaneswar is located in Zone-III as classified by IS 1893 (Part-1):2016, the buildings lateral
system is a SMRF.
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
4. CODE REQUIREMENTS:
The structural analysis and design of the building structures will comply with the requirements specified
in the National Building Code, Local Building Regulations and the relevant Indian standard codes (latest
revisions) listed herein.
IS: 875 - 1987 Part I : Code of practice for Unit weights of materials.
IS: 875 - 1987 Part II : Code of practice for Live Loads.
IS: 456 – 2000 : Code of practice for Plain and Reinforced concrete.
IS: 1893 – 2016 : Criteria for Earthquake resistant design of structures.
IS: 1080 – 1985 : Code of practice Design & Const. of Shallow Foundations
IS: 3370 – 1965 : Code of practice for the Storage of liquid part I, II & III
IS: 13920-2016 : Ductile detailing of Reinforced Concrete structure subjected to
Seismic forces.
IS: 1904-1986 : Code of practice for design and construction of foundations in soils:
General requirements (Third Revision).
IS: 2911-1979 : Code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations.
SP: 16 : Design aid for reinforced concrete to IS: 456.
SP: 23 : Hand book on concrete mixes
SP: 34 : Hand book on Concrete reinforcement
SP: 7 : National Building code of India 2005.
IS: 1343-2012 : Code of Practice for Pre stressing works.
IS: 14268 : Code of Practice for Strand Quality in stressing.
BS: 8110 – 1985 : Structural use of concrete.
TR-43 : Technical report for post tensioned slab
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
5. DESIGN CRITERIA
5.1. LOADINGS
5.1.1. DEAD LOAD : (Ref: IS 875 Part I)
RCC structural members : 25.0 KN/m3
Soil density : 18.0 KN/m3
Block Masonry wall density : 20.0 KN/m3
Floor finishes : 1.0 KN/m2
5.1.2 IMPOSED LIVE LOAD:
Imposed load of 5kN/m2 considered at 1st Floor level
Imposed load of 1.5kN/m2 considered at Terrace level
5.1.3. SEISMIC LOAD: (Ref: IS 1893: 2016)

Seismic Zone : III
Zone factor, Z : 0.16
Importance factor, I : 1.0
Response Reduction Factor, R: 5.0 (SMRF)
FUNDAMENTAL NATURAL TIME PERIOD: (Ref: IS 1893: 2016 Clause 7.6.2)
Fundamental Natural Time period of Vibration in Sec:
Height of the building (Top of Footing to Terrace) H : 9.0 m
Length of the building dx : 32.98 m
Width of the building dy : 20.305 m
Time Period Tax : 0.09 x 9 /√32.98: 0.14 Sec
Time Period Tay : 0.09 x 9 /√20.305 : 0.179 Sec
Base shear: (Ref: IS 1893-2016- Clause 6.4.2)

Design horizontal shear coefficient,
From Fig.2 of IS 1893-2016, Sa/g= 2.5

Ah : 0.04
Ahx = 0.16x1.0x2.5/(2x5) : 0.04
Ahy = 0.16x1.0x2.5/(2x5) : 0.04
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
5.2. LOAD COMBINATIONS

For concrete structures load combination as described in IS 875 (Part-5):1987 will be used with
appropriate partial safety factor described in IS 456:2000 and IS 1893 (Part-1):2016.
5.3. ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE
The buildings will be designed for “moderate” exposure conditions as defined in IS 456:2000,
Table16. The minimum nominal cover to the reinforcement shall not be less than 30 mm for all concrete
members.
5.4. FIRE RESISTANCE
All structures will be designed for 2 hour fire rating.
Minimum dimension of all reinforced concrete structural members and Nominal cover to
Reinforcements will be provided as per Fig-1 and Table-16A of IS 456:2000 respectively.
5.5. NOMINAL COVER REQUIREMENTS
Pile Cap & Pile 75mm
Footing 50mm
Staircase & Tie Beam 25mm
Column 40mm
Floor Beam & Slab 30mm
PT Beam Bottom Cover 30mm
Top Cover 40mm
5.6 DEFLECTION CRITERIA
5.6.1. FLOOR DEFLECTION CRITERIA
Maximum Service Deflection=20 mm
Incremental Deflection = Span/350
Long Term Deflection = Span/250
5.7. MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Grade of Concrete for reinforced concrete members (IS 456:2000):
Pile and Pile Cap : M25
Footing & Tie Beam : M25
Staircase : M25
Column : M35
Floor Beam & Slab : M35
PT Beam : M35
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
Steel Reinforcement:
High Yield Strength Deformed bars conforming to IS 1786-2008 with minimum yield strength of 500
N/mm2 shall be used in reinforced concrete members (Fe 500 grade).
6. ANALYSIS & DESIGN METHODOLOGY
The structural analysis and design of the entire structure is performed as per the governing guidelines of
the relevant latest Indian Standards using a 3D structural analysis and design software Staad pro Connect
edition.
The structure will be analyzed and designed for applicable Dead, Live and Seismic Loads along with
appropriate load combinations as mentioned in 5.2 above and the performance of the structure in
serviceability and collapse will be verified accordingly.
Analysis and design of Pile cap will be analyzed and designed using a 3D structural analysis and design
software SAFE V16.
Staircases in the structures shall be analyzed and designed using spread sheets developed in-house and or
manual calculations.
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
PREPARED BY VIMAL REVIEWED BY RVR APPROVED BY SEELAM Page 10
PILE CAP DESIGN

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
MODEL DEFINITION
FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
LOAD CASES
1. Dead Load
2. Live Load
3. Superimposed Dead Load
4. EQX
5. EQY
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
SERVICE LOAD COMBINATIONS:
1.0(DL+SDL+LL)
1.0(DL+EQX)
1.0(DL-EQX)
1.0(DL+EQY)
1.0(DL-EQY)
1.0(DL)+0.8(LL+EQX)
1.0(DL)+0.8(LL-EQX)
1.0(DL)+0.8(LL+EQY)
1.0(DL)+0.8(LL-EQY)
ULTIMATE LOAD COMBINATIONS:
1.5(DL+SDL+LL)
1.5(DL+SDL+EQX)
1.5(DL+SDL-EQX)
1.5(DL+SDL+EQY)
1.5(DL+SDL-EQY)
0.9(DL+SDL)+1.5(EQX)
0.9(DL+SDL)-1.5(EQX)
0.9(DL+SDL)+1.5(EQY)
0.9(DL+SDL)-1.5(EQY)
1.2(DL+SDL+LL+EQX)
1.2(DL+SDL+LL-EQX)
1.2(DL+SDL+LL+EQY)
1.2(DL+SDL+LL-EQY)
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
DEFLECTION FOR SERVICE CASE
PUNCHING SHEAR FOR GRAVITY COMBINATION

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
BMD ALONG X DIRECTION
BMD ALONG Y DIRECTION

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
REBAR ALONG X DIRECTION
REBAR ALONG Y DIRECTION

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
COLUMN DESIGN CALCULATION

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
==========================================================================
==
IS-456 L I M I T S T A T E D E S I G N
C O L U M N N O. 46 D E S I G N R E S U L T S
M35 Fe500 (Main) Fe415 (Sec.)
LENGTH: 3000.0 mm CROSS SECTION: 900.0 mm X 900.0 mm COVER: 40.0 mm
** GUIDING LOAD CASE: 11 END JOINT: 28 SHORT COLUMN
REQD. STEEL AREA : 25428.02 Sq.mm.

REQD. CONCRETE AREA: 784572.00 Sq.mm.
MAIN REINFORCEMENT : Provide 52 - 25 dia. (3.15%, 25525.44 Sq.mm.)
(Equally distributed)
TIE REINFORCEMENT : Provide 8 mm dia. rectangular ties @ 300 mm c/c
SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED (KNS-MET)

----------------------------------------------------------
Puz : 21892.52 Muz1 : 4143.15 Muy1 : 4143.15
INTERACTION RATIO: 1.00 (as per Cl. 39.6, IS456:2000)
SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED (KNS-MET)

----------------------------------------------------------
WORST LOAD CASE: 11
END JOINT: 28 Puz : 21927.52 Muz : 4203.10 Muy : 4203.10 IR: 0.98
_ STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 49
==========================================================================
==
CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
PT BEAM AND SLAB DESIGN

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
FRAMING PLAN
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
LIVE LOAD
SHORT TERM DEFLECTION

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
LONG TERM DEFLECTION
ULTIMATE SLAB BENDING MOMENT

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
SLAB STRESS ALONG X DIRECTION (TOP FIBRE)
SLAB STRESS ALONG X DIRECTION (BOTTOM FIBRE)

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
BEAM STRESS (BOTTOM FIBRE)
BEAM STRESS (TOP FIBRE)

CONSULTANT
PT
CONSULTANT
REINFORCEMENT DETAIL
ANNEXURE-1
REPORT NO: - CBC/SOIL/RIPL/224/21 DATE:-27/07/2021
REPORT ON GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

NAME OF WORK: CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING CENTER
LOCATION: BASANAPUTI, CHHATRAPUR, GANJAM
CLIENT: IDCO, BRAHMAPUR.
AGENCY: RAINAC INDIA PVT. LTD
CONSULTANT:
M/S CHIEFBUILD CONSULTANTS PVT.LTD.
N-4,346/A, IRC VILLAGE, NAYAPALLI, BBSR.
CONTACT NO.9439073947, 8917500731 .

DATE-: 27/07/2021 REF. NO.-: CBC/SOIL/RIPL/224/21
CONTENT
CHAPTER NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 01
2.0 INTRODUCTION 02
3.0 PROPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK 02
4.0 METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION
4.1.1 WASH BORING 03
4.1.2 GROUND WATER 03
LOGGING AND SAMPLE

4.1.3 03
COLLECTION
4.1.4 SUMMARY OF FIELD WORK 04
DISCUSSION OF GEOTECHNICAL
5.0 04
PROPERTIES
CONCLUSION AND
7.0 05
RECOMMENDATION
APPENDICES
APPENDIX -A BORE LOG 06
APPENDIX -B TEST RESULT 07-17
APPENDIX -C CALCULATION OF SBC 18-21
CALCULATION OF PILE CARRYING

APPENDIX -D 22-25
CAPACITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
General Objectives of Investigation:
The scope of work is to complete a geotechnical investigation work for

“GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING
CENTER”. One no. of borehole was conducted at site. This report presents the results of the
site investigation and geotechnical recommendations related to the project.
Fieldwork and Laboratory Testing:
The boring of 1no of borehole was conducted during July of 2021. Field
testing was conducted and samples were collected during boring. Field standard
penetration tests (SPT) was conducted in the boreholes during drilling. Geotechnical
laboratory tests on collected soil samples were conducted at our laboratory in
Bhubaneswar.
Geotechnical Foundation Report:
A general description of the strata encountered during boring, the soil

properties, anticipated behavior of soils during construction and measured groundwater
levels are provided in this report. Geotechnical recommendations for shallow foundations
and other general geotechnical engineering parameters related to the proposed structure
are provided in this report. The foundation design parameters were derived from
calculations based on Indian standards and some standard geotechnical books.
1.0. INTRODUCTION
This report presents results of “GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING
CENTER”. This work was performed by CHIEF BUILD CONSULTANTS PVT LTD.
Conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on our current
knowledge of the proposed location, subsurface conditions encountered at exploration
locations, results of our laboratory testing. These conclusions and recommendations
should not be extrapolated to other areas without our prior review.
2.0. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES

The purpose of the current geotechnical investigation was to explore and determine
the existing sub-strata conditions such as stratification, denseness or hardness of the strata,
position of ground water table at the location etc. and to evaluate approximate range of
safe bearing capacity for the proposed structure using empirical formulas provided in the
relevant IS codes. The goal of our investigation was to identify the key geotechnical issues
that could potentially impact the proposed project and to develop geotechnical
recommendations for design and construction of the project.
Our scope of services included the following tasks:
 Boring of One number of bore hole (BH-1) up to15.0m depth below the respective
existing ground level in order to know the sub surface stratification, conducting
necessary field tests and collection of sub-strata samples for laboratory testing.
 Testing of soil samples in the laboratory to determine its physical and engineering
properties and analyzing all field and laboratory data to evaluate bearing capacity of
the sub-strata for given foundation sizes.
 Preparation of this report containing our findings and recommendations including:
 Brief description of the proposed project;
 Description of the field exploration and laboratory testing programs;
 Discussion of the site surface and subsurface conditions;
 Preliminary geotechnical parameters for design of foundations, including the
allowable bearing capacity and estimated settlements with type and depth of
foundations for structural support.
3.0 Field Investigation Program
Field investigation work was in accordance with IS: 1892 -1979.
Field works include
 Boring in the sub-strata by Wash Boring/Rotary Drilling Method.

 Conducting SPT in soil as per IS: 2131 and collection of SPT samples.
 Collection of disturbed samples from bore holes.
4.0. Methodology of Investigation
4.1.1. Wash Boring

By using Wash Boring/rotary drilling rigs, the boreholes were progressed up to
required depth of boreholes. This method of boring is most widely used method of
advancing a boreholes. This method along with use of drilling mud to stabilize the side of
the borehole is likely to give the least disturbance to soils beneath the base of the borehole
and permit taking near to truly undisturbed samples. Diameter of boreholes was 150 mm.
Where caving of boreholes occurred, casings were used to keep the boreholes stable.
Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) were conducted in the boreholes alternate to
UDS. By connecting a split spoon sampler to ‘A’ rods and driving it by 45 cm using a 63.5
kg hammer falling freely from a height of 75 cm. The tests were conducted in accordance
with IS: 2131-1981(Reaffirmed 1987).
Number of blows required for each 15 cm penetration of the split spoon sampler
was recorded. First 15 cm penetration is ignored. The cumulative no. of blows required to
penetrate the rest 30 cm of the 45 cm sampling interval is reported as the SPT value (N
value).
For collection of un-disturbed sample thin wall samplers have been used. In order
to reduce wall friction, suitable precautions such as oiling the surface shall be taken.
Bore logs showing field data of each borehole has been attached to this report.
4.1.2. Ground water
After completion of drilling and sampling ground water level was measured in the
borehole. In BH-1 the ground water level was found at 2.5m within the drilling depth
below the existing ground level. (Refer clause-4.1.4).
4.1.3. Logging and Sample collection.
During exploration for each borehole log of borings showing details about the
exploration were prepared.
Disturbed samples were collected from the split spoon sampler after conducting
SPT. The samples were preserved in transparent polythene bags with proper identification
mark.
In case of undisturbed samples, tubes were sealed with wax at both the ends. Then
samplers were wrapped with moist jute bags to prevent loss of moisture.
4.1.4Summary of field work
The table below shows the total no. of boreholes with max explored depth and concerned
water table.
BH Reference Max depth of Ground water table below
exploration in m E.G.L in M.
BH No. 1 15.0 2.5m
5.0. Abstract of Net Safe Bearing Capacity (NSBC)

Notes: All the above NSBC calculations are done considering an isolated square footing of 2.0m X 2.0m.
Location Depth in m Type of sample Field SPT Net Safe Bearing

collected Value(N) Capacity in T/m2
1.5 SPT 06 5.35

3.0 UDS ---- 16.0
BH-1
4.5 SPT 10 20.2
6.0 SPT 13 39.7
6.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This report describes the information obtained through geotechnical investigation
carried out for the “GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PRIMARY PROCESSING
CENTER.” The data incorporated has been obtained and processed using procedures
specified in various codes of practices, good engineering norms and conventions. The field
/ laboratory results and records reported here are relevant for the test locations and time
at which the tests have been conducted.
The following conclusions, suggestions and remarks are made basing on the
available test data and sub-soil profiles as per bore logs contained in the reports.
At this site, for geotechnical investigation 1 no borehole was conducted.
The design soil parameters for borehole derived from the field testing as well as lab
testing works are presented in this report.
Based on the bore log data and laboratory test result, As per your advised and
suggestion we are submitting pile calculation having 400mm dia. and depth upto 12.0m
and pile carrying capacity is more than 19 Ton. It may be consider for design purpose or
desired by design engineer, In Open foundation case, analysis has been made considering
Square footing foundation at 3.0 m depths may consider for design purpose or desired by
design engineer.
This is the general recommendation & not based on the knowledge of structural
details for proposed structures. So designer may change the recommendation & he may
decide the depth of the foundation and type of foundation of the structure as per the
structural details.
The test reports & suggestions contained in this report are based on the engineering
characteristics of the sub-soil of the test locations and shall vary in cases of varied
characteristics of soil.
Authorized Signatory
For Chief Build Consultants Pvt. Ltd

BORE-LOG DATA SHEET
Project Name:- Primary Processing Center Bore Hole No: 1
Client Name:- IDCO, Brahmapur Type of Boring: Rotary Drilling
Contractor Name:- Rainac India Pvt. Ltd Location: Basanaputi, Chhatrapur, Ganjam
Dia of boring: 150mm Date of Commencement :- 7/20/2021
Water Level -: 2.5 mtr. Date of Completion:- 7/21/2021
Type of sample Collected.

Thickness of strata in mtr.
Classification of samples
Visual description of the
Rock Core
as per IS- 1498:1970
Blows/15cm
Charcterstics
Depth in R.L. in mtr
Penetration in mtr.
soil strata
SPT Value "N"

Subsoil profile
RQD in %
CR in %
Depth in mtr
1st 2nd 3rd

15 cm 15 cm 15 cm
1.50 -- SPT 1 3 3 6 0.45 --- ---
3.00 -- UDS --- --- --- --- 0.45 --- ---

Low
compressi
4.50 -- Clay 7.5 SPT 2 4 6 10 0.45 --- ---
bility Clay
(CL)
6.00 -- SPT 3 6 7 13 0.45 --- ---
7.50 -- SPT 5 10 12 22 0.45 --- ---
9.00 -- SPT 7 12 14 26 0.45 --- ---
Sandy
10.50 -- Clay 4.5 SPT 8 13 14 27 0.45 --- ---
Clay (SC)
12.00 -- SPT 10 14 16 30 0.45 --- ---
13.50 -- SPT 12 16 18 34 0.45 --- ---

Silty Sand
Silty Sand 3.0
(SM)
15.00 -- SPT 15 20 21 41 0.45 --- ---
6 | Page
LAB TEST RESULT OF BH-1
TEST CONDUCTED AS PER IS: 2720(Pt. I, Pt.II, Pt.III, Pt.III, Pt.III, Pt.IV, Pt. V, Pt.XI/ Pt.XIII, Pt. XXXX) AND IS: 1498-1970
DIA OF BORING: 150 mm

Sieve Analysis Atterberg's Limit
Free Swelling Index In

Soil Sample Collected
Location/Sample Ref.
Bulk Density In g/cc
as per IS : 1498- 1970

Dry Density in g/cc
Cohesion (Kg/Cm2)
Soil Classification
Natural Moisture
Angel of Internal
Specific Gravity
( 2.00mm to 0.425mm )
(0.425mm to 0.075mm)
Plasticity Index in %
Type of Sample
SPT (N) Value
Medimum sand in %
Liquid Limit in %
Plastic Limit in %
Void ratio (e)

(20 mm to 4.75mm)
(4.75mm to 2.00mm)
Content (%)
at depth(m)
Friction (Ø)
Coarse Sand in %
SL NO
Fine Gravel in %
Silt & Clay in %

Fine Sand in %
%
1 1.50 SPT 6 13.02 0.00 1.01 6.25 26.32 66.42 33.0 21.0 12.0 --- --- 2.69 --- --- --- 15.0 CL
2 3.00 UDS --- 15.58 0.00 2.11 7.01 31.01 59.87 32.0 20.0 12.0 1.819 1.574 2.68 0.70 0.25 10 10.0 CL
3 4.50 SPT 10 14.04 0.00 0.14 5.16 28.14 66.56 33.0 21.0 12.0 --- --- 2.69 --- --- --- 15.0 CL
4 6.00 SPT 13 11.06 0.00 0.63 6.11 33.11 60.15 32.0 20.0 12.0 --- --- 2.68 --- --- --- 10.0 CL
5 7.50 SPT 22 12.79 0.00 0.48 4.78 32.25 62.49 32.0 20.0 12.0 --- --- 2.68 --- --- --- 10.0 CL
BH-1
6 9.00 SPT 26 10.01 0.00 2.31 10.32 40.01 47.36 29.0 19.0 10.0 --- --- 2.66 --- --- --- 10.0 SC
7 10.50 SPT 27 9.48 0.00 4.05 15.47 37.33 43.15 28.0 18.0 10.0 --- --- 2.65 --- --- --- 10.0 SC
8 12.00 SPT 30 10.65 0.00 3.44 12.68 38.36 45.52 29.0 19.0 10.0 --- --- 2.66 --- --- --- 10.0 SC
9 13.50 SPT 34 8.55 0.00 3.18 28.47 40.17 28.18 25.0 --- Np --- --- 2.62 --- --- --- 0.0 SM
10 15.00 SPT 41 9.34 0.00 4.32 29.33 42.66 23.69 24.0 --- Np --- --- 2.61 --- --- --- 0.0 SM
07| Page
Sieve Analysis Data Sheet
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1

Sample Depth: 1.50 mtr
Sample Taken(g): 300
IS Sieve in Retained in % of Cumulative Percentage of

mm g retained % retained passing
4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 3.03 1.01 1.01 98.99
0.425 18.75 6.25 7.26 92.74
0.075 78.96 26.32 33.58 66.42
Pan/ wash 199.26 66.42 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 1.5m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
8| Page
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1


4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 6.33 2.11 2.11 97.89
0.425 21.03 7.01 9.12 90.88
0.075 93.03 31.01 40.13 59.87
Pan/ wash 179.61 59.87 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 3.0m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
09| Page
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1


4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 0.42 0.14 0.14 99.86
0.425 15.48 5.16 5.30 94.70
0.075 84.42 28.14 33.44 66.56
Pan/ wash 199.68 66.56 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 4.5m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
10| Page
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1


4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 1.89 0.63 0.63 99.37
0.425 18.33 6.11 6.74 93.26
0.075 99.33 33.11 39.85 60.15
Pan/ wash 180.45 60.15 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 6.0m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
11| Page
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1


4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 1.44 0.48 0.48 99.52
0.425 14.34 4.78 5.26 94.74
0.075 96.75 32.25 37.51 62.49
Pan/ wash 187.47 62.49 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 7.5m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
12| Page
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1


4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 6.93 2.31 2.31 97.69
0.425 30.96 10.32 12.63 87.37
0.075 120.03 40.01 52.64 47.36
Pan/ wash 142.08 47.36 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 9.0m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
13| Page
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1


4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 12.15 4.05 4.05 95.95
0.425 46.41 15.47 19.52 80.48
0.075 111.99 37.33 56.85 43.15
Pan/ wash 129.45 43.15 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 10.5m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
14| Page
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1


4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 12.15 4.05 4.05 95.95
0.425 46.41 15.47 19.52 80.48
0.075 111.99 37.33 56.85 43.15
Pan/ wash 129.45 43.15 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 12.0m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
15| Page
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1


4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 12.15 4.05 4.05 95.95
0.425 46.41 15.47 19.52 80.48
0.075 111.99 37.33 56.85 43.15
Pan/ wash 129.45 43.15 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 13.5m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
16| Page
IS: 2720 Part-IV
Boring No: BH-1


4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

2.00 12.15 4.05 4.05 95.95
0.425 46.41 15.47 19.52 80.48
0.075 111.99 37.33 56.85 43.15
Pan/ wash 129.45 43.15 100.00 0.00
Loss
110 Graph 10.5m

100
90
80
70
% of passing
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Sieve size (mm)
17| Page
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY FROM SHEAR FAILURE CRITERIA
AS PER IS:6403-CLAUSE:5.1.2
1.As per the Field report
Bore Hole No-: BH-1
Depth-: 1.50 mtr
RL-: 0 mtr
Water table -: 2.5 mtr
SPT value-: 6 no.s
Corrected SPT value-: 6
2. As per Lab. Test result
Submerged unit weight (ϒ)-: 10 kn/m2
Angle of shearing resistance (φ)-: 28.4 (As per graph in IS6403:1981)
Angle of shearing mobilisation(φ')-: 20
3.Assumptions
Type of footing-: Square
Width of footing-: 2 mtr
Length of footing-: 2 mtr
CALCULATION STEPS FOR NET SAFE BEARING CAPACITY

Overburdern pressure-:
q = (D x ysub) / 10= 15 kn/m2
By = (B xysub) / 10= 20 kn/m2
Bearing capacity factor Nq-: 15.9232 Nq'-: 6.4
Nϒ-: 18.7136 Nϒ'-: 5.39
Calculate shape factor-: Calculate Depth factor-:
Sq= 1.2 dq = 1.13
Sc = 1.3 dc = 1.25
Sϒ = 0.8 dϒ = 1.13
Inclination angle-: 0
Inclination factor-: 1
Water table correction- 0.5
Local Shear failure = q(Nq' -1)sqdqiq + 0.5ByNy'sydyiyW'
= 133.7238 kn/m2
Factor of Saftey for Soil = 2.5

Net Safe Bearing Capacity (NSBC) = 53.49 kn/m2 Or 5.35 T/m2
Safe Load Bearing Capacity(SBC) = 68.49 Or 6.85 T/m2
18| Page
Bore Hole No-: BH-1
Depth-: 3.00 mtr
RL-: 0 mtr
Cohession (C)-: 25 kn/m2
Angle of shearing resistance (φ)-: 10 (As per graph in IS6403:1981)
Bulk density-: 1.819 g/cc
Moisture Content-: 15.58 %
Dry density-: 1.574 g/cc
sp.gr-: 2.68
void ratio-: 0.70
Submerged unit weight (ϒ)-: 9.87 kn/m2
3.Assumptions
q = (D x ysub) / 10 29.61 kn/m2
By = (B xysub) / 10 19.74 kn/m2
Nq-: 10.66 Nq'-: 2.47
Nϒ-: 1.22 Nϒ'-: 0.758
Nc-: 8.35 Nc'-: 7.234
Sq 1.2 dq 1.18
Sc 1.3 dc 1.36
Sϒ 0.8 dϒ 1.18
(A). General Shear failure= CNcScdcic + q(Nq -1)Sqdqiq + 1/2ByNySydyiyW
= 693.8401 kn/m2
(B). Local Shear failure = 2/3CNcScdcic + q(Nq' -1)Sqdqiq + 1/2ByNy'SydyiyW
= 310.7947 kn/m2
Interpolating value= 401.035 kn/m2

Safe Load Bearing Capacity(SBC) = 190.02 Or 19 T/m2
19| Page
Bore Hole No-: Bh-1
Depth-: 4.50 mtr
RL-: 0 mtr
SPT value-: 10 no.s
Submerged unit weight (ϒ)-: 10 kn/m2
Angle of shearing resistance (φ)-: 30 (As per graph in IS6403:1981)
3.Assumptions

q = (D x ysub) / 10 45 kn/m2
By = (B xysub) / 10 20 kn/m2
Nϒ-: 22.4 Nϒ'-: 6.488
Sq 1.2 dq 1.39
Sc 1.3 dc 1.78
Sϒ 0.8 dϒ 1.39
(A). General Shear failure= q(Nq -1)sqdqiq + 0.5ByNysydyiyW'
= 1430.588 kn/m2
(B). Local Shear failure = q(Nq' -1)sqdqiq + 0.5ByNy'sydyiyW'
= 505.3484 kn/m2

20| Page
Bore Hole No-: Bh-1
Depth-: 6.00 mtr
RL-: 0 mtr
SPT value-: 13 no.s
Submerged unit weight (ϒ)-: 9.35 kn/m2
Angle of shearing resistance (φ)-: 30.9 (As per graph in IS6403:1981)
3.Assumptions

q = (D x ysub) / 10 56.1 kn/m2
By = (B xysub) / 10 18.7 kn/m2
Nϒ-: 27.0134 Nϒ'-: 7.586
Sq 1.2 dq 1.53
Sc 1.3 dc 2.06
Sϒ 0.8 dϒ 1.53
(A). General Shear failure= q(Nq -1)sqdqiq + 0.5ByNysydyiyW'
= 2221.561 kn/m2
(B). Local Shear failure = q(Nq' -1)sqdqiq + 0.5ByNy'sydyiyW'
= 774.6112 kn/m2

21| Page
CALCULATION OF LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF PILE BH-1
Dia = 0.500 m
Length = 15.00 m
Vertical Load Carrying Capacity
As per IRC:78-2014 (Appendix-5) & IS : 2911 Part I / Sec 2 - 2010 (Appendix B)
Axial Capacity of Piles in Soil - Static Formula
Ultimate Load Carrying Capacity (Qu) of a Pile is given by :

Qu = Ru + Rf
Where, Ru = Ultimate Base Resistance
Rf = Ultimate Shaft Resistance
The Ultimate Base Resistance of Pile is as follows:

Ru = Ap Nc cp + Ap (0.5 Dγ Nγ + PDNq)
= X' + Y' where; X' = Ap Nc cp For Cohesive Soil
Y' = Ap (0.5 Dγ Nγ + PDNq) For Granular Soil
The Ultimate Side Resistance of Pile due to friction is as follows:
Rf = Σni=1 αi ci Asi+ Σ K PDi tan δi Asi
= X+Y where; X= Σni=1αi ci Asi For Cohesive Soil

Y= Σni=1 Ki PDi tan δi Asi For Granular Soil
2
Where; Ap = cross sectional area of pile tip, in m
Nc = bearing capacity factor, may be taken as " 9 "
cp = average cohesion at pile tip, in kN/m2
αi = adhesion factor for the ith layer depending on the consistency of soil
ci = average cohesion for the ith layer, in kN/m2
Ap = cross sectional area of pile tip, in m2
D = diameter of the pile shaft, in m
γ = effective unit weight of the soil at pile tip, in kN/m2
PD = effective overburden pressure at pile tip, in kN/m2
Σni=1 = summation for layers 1 to n in which pile is installed and which contribute to positive skin friction.
Nγ & Nq = bearing capacity factors depending upon the angle of internal friction "ϕ" at pile tip.
Ki = coefficient of Earth pressure applicable for the ith layer.
PDi = effective overburden pressure for the " ith " layer, in kN/m2
d = angle of wall friction between pile and soil, in degrees (may be taken equal to f).
Asi = surface area of pile shaft in the ith layer, in m2
Presented below is in tabular form the various soil parameters as encountered through the Bore hole
Un
Depth from Corrected Bulk Density
Levels Depth C ϕ Compnent
Layer Bed Min. SPT γb
(X or Y)
Value
0.00 (m) (m) t / m3 kg / cm2 (degrees)
3.00 1 3.00 3.00 6 1.912 0.25 10.0 X
7.50 2 4.50 7.50 10 0.00 30.0 X
12.00 3 4.50 12.00 27 0.00 32.0 X
15.00 4 3.00 15.00 34 1.912 0.00 34.0 Y
Design Parameters
Pile Diameter = 0.500 m
K = 1.5 Ref : Appendix-5 of IRC:78-2014
Calculated below is the Avg. Overburden pressure at different layers.
Scour
Cumulative Avg.
Depth Level Thickness Submerged Overburden
Overburden Overburden
from Bed from of Strata Density γsub Pressure
Pressure Pressure
Bed
(m) (m) (m) t / m3 t / m2 t / m3 t / m3
3.00 3.00 1.000 3.000 3.000 3.00
7.50 4.50 1.000 4.500 7.500 5.25
0.000
12.00 4.50 1.000 4.500 12.000 9.75
15.00 3.00 1.000 3.000 15.000 13.50
No. of Zones Considered 4

Q safe due friction
Depth Asi α X Y Qu = X + Y Factor of Qsafe

Zone K
(m) (m )2
α C' As K PDi tanδ Asi t Safety t
Zone I 1.5 3.00 4.71 0.5 5.89 3.739
Zone II 1.5 4.50 7.07 0 0 32.138
170.731 2.500 68.30
Zone III 1.5 4.50 7.07 0 0 64.598
Zone V 1.5 3.00 4.71 0 0 64.366
Hence, the vertical Load carrying capacity of the pile is taken as 68.3 Ton
Q safe due end bearing
End Bearing Capacity of pile at founding level

For c-ϕ Soil
Ap Nc Cp + Ap ( 0.5 D γ Nγ + Pd Nq )
End Bearing Capacity of pile at

Where
founding level
For Cohesive Soil
Ap Nc Cp
Ap = 0.196
Nc = 10.980
Cp = 2.50
B.Capacity = 5.39
End Bearing Capacity of pile at

and
founding level
For Granular Soil
Ap = 0.196
D = 0.500
Pd = 7.50 ϕ Nq Nγ
γ = 1.00 34 30.32 42.90
ϕ = 34.00 35 33.30 48.03
Nq = 30.32
Nγ = 42.90
B.Capacity = 46.76 Hence, B Capacity = 52.15
Qsafe = 8.691 t
Total Qsafe = 68.3 + 8.7
= 76.99 t
say 76.00 t
Hence, the vertical Load carrying capacity of the pile is taken as 76 ton in the design
Horizontal Load Carrying Capacity
As per IS : 2911 Part I / Sec 2 - 1979 (Appendix C)
1. Pile Diameter = 0.500 m

2. Concrete design mix strength = 25 Mpa (Assumed)
3. Modulus of elasticity of Concrete ( Ec ) = 5000 x sqrt ( 25 )
= 250000.0 kg / cm2
4. Moment of Inertia ( I ) = π d4 / 64
= 0.00307 m4
= 306796.2 cm4
5. Embeded Length of Pile ( Le ) = 15.00 m > 4T
7.50 m
The depth of fixity is determined from the codal provisions and the graph given there.
Calculation of modulus of subgrade reaction for normally consolidated clay

As per Table 3, Appendix - C of IS:2911 Part I / Sec - 2
Depth of boring
sl N value Depth in m ηh in KN/m3 ηh x z
From to
1 0.00 3 6 3 208 625
2 3.00 7.50 10 4.5 1156 5202
3 7.50 12.00 27 4.5 5183 23323
4 12.00 15 34 3 6841 20524
∑z 15 ∑(ηh x z) 49673.863
3 3
ηh = ∑(ηh x z)/∑z = 3311.59087 KN/m 3311590.9 N/m
From Table we get nh = 0.331 kg/cm3
T = 187.48 cm
= 1.87 m
Free Length of pile ( L1 ) = Scour Level- Pile top level (length of pile above scour level)
L1 = 0.000 m
Hence; L1 / T = 0 / 1.875
= 0.00
Therefore from the graph we read the corresponding value of " Lf / T ".
Lf / T = 2.20 for Fixed head piles

Hence;
Equivalent Cantilever Length Lf = 2.2 x 1.875
= 4.12 m
The pile head deflection is calculated by " Y "
Free Head Piles

Q ( L1 + Lf ) 3
Y = In our case the piles are
3EI
considered to be Fixed
Fixed Head Piles
Head piles
Q ( L1 + Lf ) 3
Y =
12 E I
Considering an allowable deflection of 0.25 cm (say)
Lateral Load at Pile top; Q = 12 EI Y

( L1 + L f ) 3
= 3279.38 kg
= 3.28 t
Hence, the horizontal Load carrying capacity of the pile is taken as 3.28 ton for the design
ESTIMATION OF UP-LIFT CAPACITY
In the worst case of submergance the first part of the expression representing end bearing resistance is neglected,and in
In the instant case therefore the ultimate uplift capacity of pile (Q tu) shall be given by
Qtu = 2/3 rd of frictional resistance + Wp
where W p = Submerged weight of pile = (3.141/4)×D2×L×(2.5-1) gm
Frictional resistance = 170.73 T
W p = 4.418 T
so Qtu = 118.238 T
safe Up Lift capacity with a factor of safety of 3 = Qtu/3

39.41 T
SAY 39.00 T

Sea Food Basanapute - Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sea Food Basanapute - Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

10PROJECT NAME CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING PROJECT NO.

STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATION

PROJECT NAME : CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING CENTER

CLIENT : M/S INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT : M/S MARUTHI STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION

PT CONSULTANT : M/S UTRACON INDIA STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

REVISION DATE : JULY 31, 2021

1. DESIGN BASIS REPORT

2. SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

3. PILE CAP CALCULATION

5. PT BEAM AND SLAB CALCULATION

DESIGN BASIS REPORT

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS & DESIGN

PROJECT NAME : CONSTRUCTION OF PRIMARY PROCESSING CENTER SEAFOOD

PROJECT NO. : 210962

CLIENT : INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT: MARUTHI STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION

REVISION DATE : JULY 31, 2021

5.1.3. SEISMIC LOAD: (Ref: IS 1893: 2016)

Base shear: (Ref: IS 1893-2016- Clause 6.4.2)

From Fig.2 of IS 1893-2016, Sa/g= 2.5

5.2. LOAD COMBINATIONS

PILE CAP DESIGN

FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

SERVICE LOAD COMBINATIONS:

ULTIMATE LOAD COMBINATIONS:

DEFLECTION FOR SERVICE CASE

PUNCHING SHEAR FOR GRAVITY COMBINATION

BMD ALONG X DIRECTION

BMD ALONG Y DIRECTION

REBAR ALONG X DIRECTION

REBAR ALONG Y DIRECTION

COLUMN DESIGN CALCULATION

M35 Fe500 (Main) Fe415 (Sec.)

LENGTH: 3000.0 mm CROSS SECTION: 900.0 mm X 900.0 mm COVER: 40.0 mm

** GUIDING LOAD CASE: 11 END JOINT: 28 SHORT COLUMN

REQD. STEEL AREA : 25428.02 Sq.mm.

SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED (KNS-MET)

INTERACTION RATIO: 1.00 (as per Cl. 39.6, IS456:2000)

SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED (KNS-MET)

PT BEAM AND SLAB DESIGN

SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD

SHORT TERM DEFLECTION

LONG TERM DEFLECTION

ULTIMATE SLAB BENDING MOMENT

SLAB STRESS ALONG X DIRECTION (TOP FIBRE)

SLAB STRESS ALONG X DIRECTION (BOTTOM FIBRE)

BEAM STRESS (BOTTOM FIBRE)

BEAM STRESS (TOP FIBRE)

REPORT ON GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

LOCATION: BASANAPUTI, CHHATRAPUR, GANJAM

CLIENT: IDCO, BRAHMAPUR.

AGENCY: RAINAC INDIA PVT. LTD

M/S CHIEFBUILD CONSULTANTS PVT.LTD.

N-4,346/A, IRC VILLAGE, NAYAPALLI, BBSR.

CONTACT NO.9439073947, 8917500731 .

CHAPTER NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 01

3.0 PROPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK 02

4.0 METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION

4.1.1 WASH BORING 03

4.1.2 GROUND WATER 03

LOGGING AND SAMPLE