PRIMARY SOURCE SECONDARY SOURCE

CATEGORIES MEMOIRS OF A GENERAL BY REVOLT OF THE MASSES

SANTIAGO ALVAREZ A.K.A GEN. BY TEODORO AGONCILLO
APOY
AUTHOR’S SANTIAGO ALVAREZ WAS A TEODORO A. AGONCILLO IS
BACKGROUND REVOLUTIONARY LEADER AND THE CONSIDERED ONE OF
FOUNDER AND OFFICIAL TODAY ’S GREATEST
CHAIRMAN OF THE NACIONALISTA HISTORIANS. THROUGH
PARTY'S FIRST DIRECTORATE. AND THE EYES OF OUTSIDERS,
KNOWN AS "KIDLAT NG APOY" HIS NEW HISTORY BRAND
BECAUSE OF HIS INFLAMED ELIMINATED TRADITIONAL
COURAGE AND COMMITMENT AS WAYS OF WRITING THE
COMMANDER OF THE FAMOUS HISTORY OF THE
BATTLES OF CAVITE, HE WAS PHILIPPINES AND
PLEASED AS THE "HERO" OF THE INTRODUCED A MORE
BATTLE OF DALAHICAN IN THE FILIPINO-CENTRIC STYLE,
PRESENT-DAY CAVITE REGION. SEEING THE EVENTS OF
THE PHILIPPINES UNFOLD
THROUGH THE EYES OF
FILIPINOS.
OBJECTIVE OF IN THE TEJEROS CONVENTION, TWO MAJOR GROUPS:
THE AUTHOR SANTIAGO ÁLVAREZ REFLECTS ON MAGDALO AND
AND FURTHER DISCUSSES WHAT MAGDIWANG IN THE
HAPPENED IN THE CONVENTION OF THE
AFOREMENTIONED ELECTION BY TEJEROS. THE
TWO GROUPS: MAGDALO AND DELEGATIONS OF THE
MAGDIWANG. THE DELEGATIONS INDIVIDUAL CONCERNED,
OF THE INDIVIDUAL CONCERNED, WHICH OCCUR ONLY ON
WHICH OCCUR ONLY ON THE THE ELECTION DAY, ARE
ELECTION DAY, ARE DETAILED AND DETAILED AND LISTED. THE
LISTED. EVENT WILL BE REPORTED
BY TEODORO AGONCILLO
BEFORE THE TEJEROS
CONVENTION. THE DATES,
BATTLES AND SIGNIFICANT
EVENTS THAT WERE
DIFFERENT IN THE
AWARENESS OF ÁLVAREZ
WERE LISTED.
DATE WRITTEN IT WAS WRITTEN AT THE TIME OF IT WAS WRITTEN IN 1947 AS
OR PUBLISHED EVENTS AND FIRST PUBLISHED IN AN ENTRY IN A BIOGRAPHY
THE 1920S. OF NATIONAL BONIFACIO
AND WAS ALSO PUBLISHED
IN 1956.
MENTION OF  MARCH 25, 1897 - AT  THE CAPITAL WAS
DATES TEJEROS, THE ASSEMBLY TRANSFERRED TO
CONVENES SAN FRANCISCO DE
 MARCH 27, 1897-THE DAY MALABON AT THE
 WHEN EYEWITNESSES WHO BEGINNING OF
SURVEILLED ON THE NOVEMBER AND
PROCEEDINGS ANNOUNCED LATER TO NAIK.
THAT A MEETING HAD  IN THE THIRD
ALREADY TAKEN PLACE IN INVITATION, HE
THE PARISH HOUSE OF ACCEPTED THE
TANZA. OFFER IN THE
MIDDLE OF
DECEMBER 1896
AND LEFT FOR
CAVITE.
 JANUARY 2 1897:
SAN FRANCISCO DE
MALABON CITY
FESTIVAL
 APRIL 1897 - THE
TOWN WAS
CAPTURED BY
SPANIARDS. MARCH
22, 1897-THE
BIRTHDAY OF
AGUINALDO
MENTION OF  SAN FRANCISCO DE  CAVITE, ROSE IN
PLACES MALABON, CAVITE, WHICH REVOLT
CONVENED THE ASSEMBLY SUCCESSFULLY
 PARISH HOUSE IN TANZA,  MONTALBAN AND
WHERE THERE IS A MARIQUINA
RUMORED MEETING MOUNTAINS-A
BETWEEN MAGDALO DELEGATE HUNT
LEADERS FOR SUPREMO
WHERE HE HAS
BEEN STAYING
 JUAN CASTANEDA'S
HOUSE IN IMUS,
WHERE THE REBEL
LEADERS GAVE
BONIFACIO
 SAN FRANCISCO DE
MALABON, THE
PLACE OF
ASSEMBLY
 IT WAS THIS PLACE
WHERE THE
FORMER SUMMER
RESORT OF THE
FRIARS, TANZA OR
SANTA CRUZ DE
MALABON,
WITNESSED THE
FIRST SIGNIFICANT
 ELECTION UNDER
THE AUSPICES OF
THE KATIPUNAN
GOVERNMENT.
 NASUGBO, TUWI,
AND LOOK,
BATANGAS, UNDER
THE GOVERNMENT
OF MAGDIWANG,
 KAWIT - CAPITAL OF
THE MAGDALO
BEFORE IT
 THE ESTATE HOUSE
OF TEJEROS - A
MAGDIWANGTERITO
KEY  SUPREMO ANDRES  SUPREMO ANDRES
PERSONALITIES BONIFACIO BONIFACIO
 EMILIO AGUINALDO  EMILIO AGUINALDO
 SANTIAGO V. ALVAREZ  JOSE DEL ROSARIO
(MAGDIWANG)  PRES. BALDOMERO
 MARAINO ALVARE AGUINALDO- LEADER
 DANIEL TIRONA- BREAK THE OF MAGDALO
MEETING RULES AND  DANIEL TIRONA-
INSULTED THEELECTED BREAK THE MEETING
 JOSE DEL ROSARIO RULES AND
 PRES. BALDOMERO INSULTED THE
AGUINALDO- LEADER OF ELECTED
MAGDALO
SEQUENCING  ON MARCH 25, 1897, THE  TWO FACTIONS, THE
OF EVENTS ASSEMBLY AT TEJEROS WAS MAGDIWANG AND
FINALLY CONVENED. THE MAGDALO,
 THE SUPREME, MR. ANDRES DIVIDE THE
BONIFACIO, WON OVER MR. KATIPUNAN OF
MARIANO ALVAREZ AS THE CAVITE.
INTERIOR SECRETARY  WHEN CAVITE ROSE
 ANDRES BONIFACIO AND STRONGLY IN
DANIEL TIRONO HAD A REBELLION, LED BY
HEATED CONFLICT. HIS OPPOSING
 THE REPRESENTATIVES OF FORCES, THE
MAGDALO DIDN'T COME TO LEADERS FELL INTO
THE RECONCILIATION CONFLICTS ARISING
CONFERENCE. FROM THE WISH OF
 THE CONVERSATION TOOK ONE PARTY TO RULE
PLACE AT THE PARISH IT OVER THE OTHER.
HOUSE OF TANZA AND THE  THE MAGDIWANG
DECISIONS OF THE MEN INVENTED
SUPREMO ABOUT THE ANDRES BONIFACIO
ELECTION AT THE FRIAR'S IN ORDER TO VISIT
ESTATE HOUSE WERE NOT CAVITE.
RESPECTED.  THE PRELIMINARY
  THOSE ELECTED AT THE MEETING AROSE
TEJEROS CONVENTION CONFUSION
KNELT BEFORE A CRUCIFIX BETWEEN THE
AT THE MEETING AT THE MAGDALO LEADERS
TANZA PARISH BUILDING. AND BONIFACIO,
 FOR THEIR OATH-TAKING THEN BONIFACIO
CEREMONIES, THE WAS TAKEN BY THE
MAGDALO POSTED REBEL LEADERS TO
SOLDIERS TO GUARD THE THE HOUSE OF JUAN
TANZA PARISH BUILDING. CASTANEDA IN IMUS.
MISUNDERSTANDING
EXISTED BETWEEN
THE ADHERENTS OF
THE MAGDIWANG
AND THE MAGDALO
 THE MAGDALO
PARTY PROTESTED
STRONGLY AND
INSISTED ON AN
ELECTION.
 THE SITUATION HAD
NOT EASED UP A BIT
WHEN THE LEADERS
OF THE MAGDIWANG
DECIDED TO HOLD
ANOTHER
CONVENTION
 A HOT DISPUTE
BETWEEN ANTONIO
MONTENEGRO AND
SANTIAGO ALVAREZ
[INCIDENT BETWEEN
ANDRES BONIFACIO
AND DANIEL TIRONO
 BONIFACIO WROTE
TO HIS UNCLE-IN-
LAW, MARIANO
ALVAREZ, FROM SAN
FRANCISCO DE
MALABON, TO
 THE DIRTY WORK OF
THE CONFERENCE
WAS DISCOVERED
BY ANDRES
BONIFACIO.
DIFFERENCES THE ACTIVITIES PROVIDED BY AGONCILLO SPOKE A BIT
BETWEEN THE ALVAREZ ARE ALL ABOUT HOW THE ABOUT A SECONDARY
TWO ELECTION IS GOING AND WHAT SOURCE FOR EACH PARTY.
ACCOUNTS HAPPENED IN TEJEROS DURING HE WROTE THE STUFF
THE ELECTION DAY. THAT HAPPENED BEFORE
 THE TEJEROS
CONVENTION TOOK PLACE.
IT SEEMED THAT THIS
ACCOUNT WAS
ADEQUATELY
COMPREHENSIVE WITH
REGARD TO THE EMOTION
THAT EVERY DESCRIBED
PERSONALITY HAD
DISPLAYED. THERE WERE
SOME MINOR CHANGES
FROM THE PRIMARY
RESOURCE DATA
PROVIDED.
PROBABLE BECAUSE OF THE WITNESS ITSELF MAYBE BECAUSE TO THE
REASON WHY DESCRIBE THE EVENT OF THE SECONDARY SOURCE SAID
THE TEJEROS MEETING. EMOTIONAL DESCRIPTION
DIFFERENCES THAT THE DIFFERENCE
MAY HAVE BEEN
OCCURRED.
THEMATIC BECAUSE OF THE SMEAR OF BECAUSE OF THE SAID
MOTIVATION OF ANDRES BONIFACIO'S EVENT THAT HAS BEEN
AUTHORS (WHY EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT, THE TRANSPIRED AND
THE TEJEROS REASON WHY THE TEJEROS INFORMATION GATHERED
MEETING MEETING FAILED WAS THAT THEY THEY WE’RE ABLE TO
FAILED?) THOUGHT HE WAS NOT WORTHY IDENTIFY WHY IT FAILED,
OF THE POSITION. DUE TO EDUCATIONAL
BACKGROUND OF ANDRES
BONIFACIO.

1. What are common with the two documents?

 It states of what generally happened in the Tejeros conference.
2. What are the differences?
 The primary source had only addressed what was normally happening at the
Tejeros Convention. However, the second source deepens and went on to write
about what had happened before, after the conference of Tejeros.
3. Based on the two documents what characteristics do primary sources have?
 The events Alvarez is thinking about are all about how the campaign is going and
what happened in Tejeros on election day.
4. What characteristics do secondary sources have?
 Agoncillo talked a little about every party as a secondary source. He wrote about
the things that had happened since the Tejeros conference was held. It seemed
that with regard to the feeling that any individual identified had displayed, this
account was adequately comprehensive.