INSTITUT FOR STATSKUNDSKAB

Marion Godman, Søren Flinch Midtgaard, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen og Tore Vincents Olsen

Undervisningsplan/pensumliste for:
Videnskabsteori

Undervisningsplan:

KOMP = teksten er optrykt i et kompendium, som kan købes i PB.

AUL = Teksten kan downloades og printes via AU LIBRARY.

TIME EMNE FORELÆSNING Antal HOLDTIME Antal

sider sider
1 Emne og Pensum samt hvor det Pensum til holdtime
hvilken forefindes samt hvor det findes
forelæser

2 U35. Hvad er Philosophy of Social Science, 9 Samme pensum som til

videnskab- kap. 1 (9 sider) Grundbog forelæsning
steori? (SFM)
(2.9) Lippert-Rasmussen, K. 6
(2015) ‘Hvad er
Videnskabsteori’, Note hentes
på Brightspace (6 sider)

Machlup, F. (1961) ‘Are the 19

social sciences really
inferior?’, Southern Economic
Journal 17, 173-184. (19
sider) (AUL)

3 U36. Logisk Gilje, N. & Grimen, H. (2007) 40

positivisme, Samfundsvidenskabernes
Popper og Forudsætninger (Kbh: Hans
Kuhn (SFM) Reitzel, 2007) ’Logisk
(9.9) positivisme’ og ’Kritisk
rationalisme’ s. 52-91. (40
sider) (KOMP)

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. et al. 31
(2015) Videnskabsteori (Kbh:
Hans Reitzel, 2015),
’Videnskabsparadigmer’, s.
169-178, 184-204. (31 sider)
(KOMP)

4 U37. Philosophy of Social Science, 22

Naturalisme kap. 2 (s. 11-32). Grundbog
vs fortolkning
1
 (SFM) Fay, B. & Moon, J. D. (1977), 19
(16.9) “What would an adequate
philosophy of social science
look like?’, Philosophy of
Social Science 7, 209-227. (19
sider) (AUL)

5 U38. Philosophy of Social Science, 19

Forklaring af kap. 3 (s. 35-53). Grundbog
menneskelige
handlinger Kincaid, H. (1990) ‘Defending 28
(TVO) laws in social science’,
(23.9) Philosophy of Social Science
20, 56-83. (28 sider) (AUL)

6 U39. The Philosophy of Social 16

Intentionali- Science, kap. 4, s. 55-70.
tet (SFM) Grundbog
(30.9)
Føllesdal, D. (1979) 18
‘Hermeneutics and the
hypothetico-deductive
method’ Dialectica 33: 319-
336. (18 sider) (AUL)

7 U40. Philosophy of Social Science, 19

Behaviorisme kap 5, pp. 73-91. Grundbog
(TVO)
(7.10) Hempel, C. (1959) ‘The logic 37
of functional analysis’, i L.
Gross (red.) Symposium on
Sociological Theory
(Evanston: HarperCollins), s.
271-307. (37 sider) (KOMP)

PRØVEEKSAMEN TIL
AFLEVERING SIDST I DENNE
UGE (UDLEVERES MANDAG)

8 U41. Rational Philosophy of Social Science, 26

choice teori kap. 6, s. 93-118. Grundbog
(KLR)
(14.10) Elster, J. (1989) Nuts and 31
Bolts for the Social Sciences
(Cambridge University
Press), pp. 22-51 (31 sider)
(KOMP)

9 U43. Den Philosophy of Social Science, 20

sociale kap. 7, s. 121-140. Grundbog
konstruktion
af Hacking, I. (1999) The Social 35
2
 virkeligheden Construction of What?
(TVO) Cambridge, Massachusetts:
(28.10) Harvard University Press, pp.
1-35 (KOMP)

10 U44. Holisme Philosophy of Social Science, 21

(TVO) kap. 9, s. 173-193. Grundbog
(4.11)
Kincaid, H. (1986) ‘Reduction, 22
Explanation, and
Individualism’, Philosophy of
Science 53, 492-513. (22
sider) (AUL)

11 U45. Philosophy of Social Science, 16

Funktionalis- kap. 10, s. 195-210. (16
me (SFM) sider). Grundbog
(11.11)
Elster, Jon (1983) ‘Functional 18
explanation’, fra Jon Elster
Explaining Technical Change
(Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press), s. 55-68,
241-243. (18 sider) (KOMP)

12 U46. Philosophy of Social Science, 25

Sociobiologi kap. 11, s. 211-235.
(SFM) Grundbog
(18.11)
Elster, J. (2007) Explaining 28
Social Behavior, (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press)
271-298. (28 sider) (KOMP)

Dawkins, R. (1976) ‘Memes’, i 13

R. Dawkins The Selfish Gene
(Oxford: Oxford University
Press) s. 203-215. (13 sider)
(KOMP)

13 U47. Kulturel Philosophy of Social Science, 20

evolution kap. 12, 237-256. Grundbog
(MG)
(25.11) Sperber, D. (1996) ‘Selection 21
and attraction in cultural
evolution’, i Sperber
Explaining Culture (Oxford:
Blackwell), s. 98-118. (21
sider) (KOMP)

14 U48. Værdier i Philosophy of Social Science, 24

samfundsvide kap. 14, s. 283-306.
3
 nskaben Grundbog
(TVO)
(2.12) Nagel, E. (1979) ’The value- 18
oriented bias of social
enquiry’ i E. Nagel The
Structure of Science
(Indianapolis: Hackett
Publishing Co.), s. 485-502.
(18 sider) (KOMP)

15 U49. Philosophy of Social Science, 16

Opsummering kap. 15, s. 307-322.
(SFM) Grundbog
(9.12)
Boghossian, P. Fear of 24
Knowledge (Clarendon Press,
2006), pp. 1-24 (24 s).
(KOMP)

Samlet pensum: 661

Pensumliste:

Bøger:
Alexander Rosenberg (2016). Philosophy of Social Science. Westview Press.

Online-materiale/AU Library:
Fay, B. & Moon, J. D. (1977) “What would an adequate philosophy of social science look like?’,
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7, 209-227.

Føllesdal, D. (1979) ‘Hermeneutics and the hypothetico-deductive method’ Dialectica 33: 319-336
https://www-jstor-org.ez.statsbiblioteket.dk:12048/stable/42968424

Kincaid, H. (1986) ‘Reduction, Explanation, and Individualism’, Philosophy of Science 53, 492-513.

Kincaid, H. (1990) ‘Defending laws in social science’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20, 56-83.

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2015) ‘Hvad er Videnskabsteori’ Note hentes på Brightspace.

Machlup, F. (1961) ‘Are the social sciences really inferior?’, Southern Economic Journal 17, 173-184.

Kompendium:
Boghossian, P. (2006) Fear of Knowledge (Clarendon Press), s. 1-24.
4
Dawkins, R. (1976) ‘Memes’, i R. Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (Oxford: Oxford University Press), s.
203-215. (13 sider)

Elster, Jon (1983) ‘Functional explanation’, fra Jon Elster Explaining Technical Change (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press), s. 55-68, 241-243.

Elster, J. (1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences (Cambridge University Press), s. 22-51

Elster, J. (2007) Explaining Social Behavior (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), s. 271-298.
(28 sider)

Gilje, N. & Grimen, H. (2007) Samfundsvidenskabernes Forudsætninger (Kbh.: Hans Reitzel), ’Logisk
positivisme’ og ’Kritisk rationalisme’, s. 52-91.

Hacking, I. (1999) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University
Press, s. 1-35.

Hempel, C. (1959) ‘The logic of functional analysis’, i L. Gross (red.), Symposium on Sociological
Theory (Evanston: HarperCollins), s. 271-307.

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. et al. (2015) Videnskabsteori (Kbh.: Hans Reitzel), ’Videnskabsparadigmer’, s.

169-178, 184-204.

Nagel, E. (1979) ’The value-oriented bias of social enquiry’ i E. Nagel, The Structure of Science
(Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.), s. 485-502.

Sperber, D. (1996) ‘Selection and attraction in cultural evolution’, i Sperber, Explaining Culture
(Oxford: Blackwell), s. 98-118.