Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: Breast Imaging
Code: 154016

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Task 4 Elaboration

1. Activity Description
Type of activity: Collaborative
Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 2
Highest score of the activity: 125 points
The activity starts on: The activity ends on: Saturday,
Thursday,October 28, 2021 November 28,2021
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:
 Learning outcome 2: Recognize the different risk factors for the development of
breast cancer, and the epidemiology of both breast cancer and benign diseases of the
Breast.
The activity consists of:
 Elaboration of a mental map of the different techniques and applications for
the diagnosis of breast diseases.
For the development of the activity consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must:

 Consult the news fórum
 View the web conference

In the Learning Environment, you must:

 Consult bibliographic references

In the Evaluation Environment, you must:

 Publish the requested document

Evidences of individual work:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

 Make contributions to the discussion fórum.

 Comment on the contributions made by colleagues.
 Socialize unsolved questions in the fórum.

1
Evidences of collaborative work:
The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:

 Compile a paper with Information from all studentes

 Prepare a mental map with the most relevant information on breast diseases

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Collaborative evidences, consider the following:

 Write the denition of different breast pathology.
 Comparing risk factors in breast diseases.
 Select the best mind map.

 All members of the group must participate with their contributions in

the development of the activity.

 In each group a single member will be chosen to submit the requested product
in the environment indicated by the teacher.

 Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets
all the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

 Only the members of the group that participated with contributions during
the time assigned for the activity should be included as authors of the
submitted product.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your
own work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out
by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation,
the score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being
derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score
obtained will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Collaborative

Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 2
The highest score in this activity is 125 points
First evaluation High level: The student identifies the most important concepts
criterion: about different techniques and applications for the diagnosis of
breast diseases.
The student If your work is at this level, you can get between 45
identifies the most points and 15 points
important concepts
about different Average level: The student partially identifies the most
techniques and
important concepts about different techniques and applications
applications for the
for the diagnosis of breast diseases.
diagnosis of breast
diseases. If your work is at this level, you can get between 14
points and 5 points
This criterion
represents 45 Low level: The student does not identify the most important
points of the total concepts about different techniques and applications for the
of 125 points of diagnosis of breast diseases.
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 4
points and 1 point

Second evaluation
High level: The student presents clear and relevant concepts
criterion:
that demonstrate his knowledge of the subject.
The student presents If your work is at this level, you can get between 30
clear and relevant points and 15 points
concepts that
demonstrate his Average level: The student presents some clear and relevant
knowledge of the
concepts that partially demonstrate their knowledge of the
subject
subject.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 14
This criterion
points and 7 points
represents 30
points of the total
Low level: The student does not present any clear or relevant
of 125 points of
concepts that demonstrate their knowledge of the subject.
the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 6
points and 1 point
Third evaluation
criterion: High level: The student uses key words that clearly
and directly summarize the diagnostic utility, indication
The student uses key and contraindications of each mentioned technique
words that clearly
and directly
summarize the If your work is at this level, you can get between 30
diagnostic utility, points and 15 points
indication and
contraindications of Average level: The student uses some key words
each mentioned If your work is at this level, you can get between 14
technique points and 7 points

This criterion Low level: The student does not use keywords
represents 30 If your work is at this level, you can get between 6points
points of the total and 1 point
of 125 points of
the activity.
Fourth evaluation High level: The concepts are logically hierarchical and the
criterion: connectors used in the concepts allow to elaborate coherent
propositions
The concepts are
logically hierarchical If your work is at this level, you can get between 20
and the connectors points and 10 points
used in the concepts
allow to elaborate Average level: Some concepts are logically hierarchical.
coherent propositions
If your work is at this level, you can get between 9
points and 6 points
This criterion
represents 20 Low level: None of the concepts is logically hierarchical.
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 5
of 125 points points and 1 point
of the activity.