You are on page 1of 3

SH1920

Unit 5: Collecting, Organizing, Treating, and Analyzing Data


Main Ideas: Data is present everywhere and can be analyzed to reach certain conclusions and make decisions
Essential Question: How are data, results, and discussion different from each other?

Methods for
Based on Methods for
What to look for Validation
Your: Exploration
1. _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1. _ _ _ _ _ _
2. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

07 Handout 1 *Property of STI


 student.feedback@sti.edu Page 1 of 3
SH1920

Data Cleaning/Preparation
− Data cleaning or preparation is meant to transform your data into Data Interpretation and Presentation
manageable formats. Raw data is managed by converting audio − Chunks are clustered into categories which are then coded into
or video files into transcripts, and images into photos or charts. similar categories. From these codes and clusters, themes
− This step is focused on identifying which data is relevant and emerge that can answer the research question posed.
usable. − Since Interpretation and presentation are simultaneous, there
are different methods by which you represent your data.
Data Exploration o Narrative – focused on telling a story using the results.
− Data exploration is divided into four (4) repetitive steps: o Chronological – according to the narrative described by each
Chunking, clustering, coding, and memoing. Proper data participant. Useful in case studies.
exploration should have at least two (2) or three (3) cycles. o Critical Incidents – focused on the main incidents, not the
− The goal of data exploration is to categorize and refine your data participants
to identify themes and trends to be used in making o Thematic – data is presented in a way that it revolves around
discussions/conclusions. a particular theme
− Chunking is the act of breaking down your cleaned data and o Visual representation – data can be presented as charts or
determining which parts are for what purpose (e.g., is this about tables. Visual representation should be thought of carefully
participant information, background, examples provided, etc.). when being used in qualitative research. Remember that you
− Clustering is the act of taking these chunks and classifying them should not quantify your results if it isn’t necessary.
according to labels or basic codes. − There are multiple ways to present your data in a written
− Coding, on the other hand, is focused on creating labels and manner. Below are some common patterns in writing qualitative
categories that represent the data accurately. Codes should be results and discussions.
specific and refined so that they answer and relate to the o Write the main idea first, then a detailed account from the
research question. These can start as general and then become participant.
specific. There are three (3) patterns or levels of coding: o Write a description of the participant's account, then feature
o Descriptive to Interpretative to Pattern – move from it.
summary to meaning o Join both the participant's account and your interpretation
o Open to Axial to Selective – moves from initial theory to (results and discussion). This is often discouraged.
developing relationships between codes for the emerging
theory Validity
o First to the second cycle – moves from describing the data This is used in qualitative research to verify or check if the data
units to inferring meaning collected from the procedures performed by the researcher is accurate
− Memoing is the act of taking these codes and clusters and then and can support the proposed discussions (Haradhan, 2017). There
adding notes that help explain or define them. are four (4) types of validity that can be performed for qualitative
research.

07 Handout 1 *Property of STI


 student.feedback@sti.edu Page 2 of 3
SH1920

b. Discriminant Validity – determines the lack of relationship


1. Content validity among certain variables according to theory and empirical
It is the extent to which the questions on the instrument and the scores evidence.
from these questions represent all possible questions that could be
asked about the content or skill (Creswell, 2005). 4. Triangulation
a. Face Validity – this is the minimum index of content validity. Triangulation relies on multiple validation methods to verify the results
This tests the degree by which the results or instrument of a study. This can be done by any of the following methods:
measures the concept being measured. a. With different investigators – the instrument is used on various
sample groups OR is delivered by a different set of
2. Criterion-based validity researchers.
It is used to predict current or future performances by correlating
results with another criterion of interest (Burns et al., 2017). b. With different research methods (same research type) –
a. Concurrent Validity – relates the results to an already another qualitative approach is used to collect data which will
established/validated set of scores. then be used to validate the initially collected data. (e.g., using
b. Predictive Validity – relates the results to a future criterion to document analysis to validate observations).
predict some form of behavior.
c. With different research methods (different research types) – a
3. Construct validity quantitative approach is used to validate the qualitative results
It is used when the goal of the study is to construct theories to collected. This is usually done in mixed research with
understand better and predict behavior (Thatcher, 2010). statistical analysis.
a. Convergent Validity – determines the correlation of different
results. This tests the relationship among variables.

References
Billups, F. D. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis NERA Webinar Presentation. New York:
Northeastern Educational Research Association.
Haradhan, M. (2017, December 24). Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research:
Validity and Reliability. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 3(17), 58-82.
Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83458/
Melegrito, M. F., Mendoza, D. J., & Mactal, R. B. (2017). Applied Research: An
Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods and Report Writing. Quezon
City: Pheonix Publishing House, Inc.
Statistics Solutions. (2019). Dissertation Consulting Services. Retrieved from Statistics
Solutions: Advancement Through Clarity:
https://www.statisticssolutions.com/dissertation-consulting-services
Torneo, A., & Clamor-Torneo, H. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research:
Practical Research 1. Quezon City: Sibs Publishing House, Inc.
University of Southern California. (2019, December 16). Research Guides: 8. The
Discussion. Retrieved from USC Libraries:
https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/discussion

07 Handout 1 *Property of STI


 student.feedback@sti.edu Page 3 of 3

You might also like