TABLE 1.

1
Environmental
Change in soil conditions
Sudden change in weather condition
Sample type of delays identified during MPDM dat
Equipment
Equipment being positioned
Temporary breakdown
Unscheduled Maintainance
 TABLE 1.1
ype of delays identified during MPDM data collection
Labour Material Management
Personal Break Not available when needed Poor Planning
Finding Material or tools Defective and has to be replaced Undecided on what to be done
Getting Instructions Improperly located on site Unavailable for instruction
Late arrival,early departure Interfacing with other operations
To illustrate the data collection procedure, consider a simple process involving the shuttering of a pier column. The produc
unit identified for this was the actual placement of a MS Pier Shutter. The production cycle began with the lifting of shutte
and concluded when that same shutter was temporarily installed. The leading resource was the mobile crane used to place
the MS Pier Shutter. The cycle times were timed by reviewing the time-lapse film of the operation.

TABLE 1.2. MPDM Data Collection Sheet

MPDM Data Collection Sheet
Date
Operation Peir Shutter Installation Observer
Production Units One Per Shutter Units Of Time
Production Cycle Cycle Time Environmental Equipment Labour Material Management
i ii iii iv v vi
1 354
2 465 1.00
3 343
4 445 1.00
5 504 1.00
6 470 1.00
7 395
8 345
9 360
10 400
11 460 1.00
12 385
13 360
14 353
15 372
16 505 0.50 0.50
17 465 1.00
18 440 1.00
19 430 1.00
20 360
21 375
22 405 1.00
23 475 1.00

Processing Column* : Column I minus the average cycle time where delay has not happened
 of a pier column. The production
egan with the lifting of shutter
he mobile crane used to place
ation.

10/10/2021
Ajaynarayan Pandey
Seconds
Processing Column*
vii Average Where Delay Has Not Happened 4402
12.83 0.0
98.17 1.0
23.83 0.0
78.17 1.0
137.17 1.0
103.17 1.0
28.17 0.0
21.83 0.0
6.83 0.0
33.17 0.0
93.17 1.0
18.17 0.0
6.83 0.0
13.83 0.0
5.17 0.0
138.17 1.0
98.17 1.0
73.17 1.0
63.17 1.0
6.83 0.0
8.17 0.0
38.17 1.0
108.17 1.0
366.83333
 Table 1.3.
SUMMARY OF MPDM COMPUTATION
Production Total Time
i
Sum of all cycle where no delay was observed
Non Delayed Production Cycle
4402.00
Sum Of All Cycles
Overall Production Cycle
9466

Table 1.4.
MPDM DELAY INFORMAT
Environmental
Time Variance i
Total No Of Observations 2
Total Added Time 141.33
Probability Of Occurance 0.09
Relative Severity 0.17
Expected Percentage of Delay Time 1%

OVERALL METHOD PRODUCTIVITY Ideal Productivity x (1- Sum of Expected % Of delay)

IDEAL PRODUCTIVITY 1/mean cycle time for non - delayed cycles

Ideal Cycle Variability 4%

Overall Cycle Variability 13%

 Table 1.3.
SUMMARY OF MPDM COMPUTATION
Number Of Cycle Mean Cycle Time
ii iii
No.of cycles where no delay occurred Column i / Column ii
12.00 366.83
Total Number Of Cycles Column i / Column ii
23 411.57

Table 1.4.
MPDM DELAY INFORMATION
Equipment Labour
ii iii
5 1
440.83 69.08
0.22 0.04
0.21 0.17
5% 1%

0.0024

0.0027 6.11388888888889
 (Cumm. Cycle time-Non Delay Cycle Time )/n
iv
Column vii from Table 1.2 for non delayed cycle/ column ii
15.47
Column vii from Table 1.2 for all cycle/ column ii
52.80

Material Management
iv v
1 3
137.17 240.42
0.04 0.13
0.33 0.19
1% 3%

8.743778259 8.74 Shutter Fixing / Hour

6.11 Minutes / Cycle 9.813721036 9.81 Shutter Fixing / Hour