National Christian Life College

Senior High School Department

Practical Research 1

PEER EVALUATION

REMINDERS: All members of each group shall participate in the evaluation of each members.
Honest evaluation shall be implemented based on your groupmates’ performance.

PART 1
NAME OF MEMBERS DIVISION OF LABOR/ REMARKS Feel free to
ASSIGNED TASKS state your evaluation.
Write your name, and evaluate (Accomplished,
yourself first. partially done, no
contribution )
Jayvee alabo 5 lines accomplished
Karl lazar 6 lines accomplished
Sandra companero 6 lines accomplished
Jaycee monzon 6 lines accomplished
Janella de asis 6 lines accomplished
Rochelle ancero 6 lines accomplished
Ellen regio 6 lines accomplished
Kim cuison 6 lines accomplished
Allyson carreon 6 lines accomplished

5- Participates althrough out the process. Reliable with all the assigned task. Shows
critical thinking all the time and is knowledgeable with the subject matter. Contributes to all
aspect of the project. Shows excellent attitude towards the project and towards his/her group
mates.

4- Participates most of the time. Reliable with all the assigned task, but needs reminders.
Shows critical thinking most of the time and has required knowledge about the subject matter.
Contributes to all aspect of this project. Shows good attitude towards the project and towards
his/her group mates.

3- Occasionally participates in the process. Reminder is given several times before

compliance to the assigned task. Exhibits minimal critical thinking and is knowledgeable with
the subject matter. Limited contribution to all aspect of this project. Shows fair attitude
towards the project and towards his/her group mates.

2- Participates only if convenient to his/her perspective. Reminder is given several times

but exerts minimum compliance to the assigned task. No critical thinking exhibited and with
limited knowledge about the subject matter. Contributes minimally to all aspect of this
project. Shows fair attitude towards the project and towards his/her group mates.

1- No participation. Unreliable and with no compliance. No knowledge about the

subject matter. No Contribution given. Shows poor towards the project and
towards his/her group mates.

PART 2

Put a check on the corresponding box.

NAME 5 4 3 2 1
Jayvee alabo /
Karl lazar /
Sandra companero /
Jaycee monzon /
Janella de asis /
Rochelle ancero /
Ellen regio /
Kim cuison /
Allyson carreon /

PART 3

In scale of 1-5, as 1 being the lowest and 5 the highest. Rate yourself and your
groupmates according to the following:

CRITERIA SCORE
Critical Thinking: Gives valuable idea and 5
contribution
Collaboration: Maintains constant communication to 5
every member of the group. Offers help although out
the process
Character: Keeps good relationship with every 2
member.
12
Signature over printed name of group leader

OCTOBER 31 2021
Date Submitted