Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Teamwork

    Uploaded by

    Amizan Abdullah
    7 views1 page
    This 3 sentence summary provides the key details about the rubric: The rubric assesses student teamwork on a mini project in a Brickworks and Concrete Laboratory course, evaluating their ability to assemble the project accurately and on time as well as their level of interaction and participation within the group. Students are judged on criteria such as sharing tasks equally, utilizing each member's abilities, leadership, respect for others, and time management. Scores are awarded based on demonstrated levels of poor, fair, moderate, good, and excellent teamwork.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    teamwork

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This 3 sentence summary provides the key details about the rubric: The rubric assesses student teamwork on a mini project in a Brickworks and Concrete Laboratory course, evaluating their ability to assemble the project accurately and on time as well as their level of interaction and participation within the group. Students are judged on criteria such as sharing tasks equally, utilizing each member's abilities, leadership, respect for others, and time management. Scores are awarded based on demonstrated levels of poor, fair, moderate, good, and excellent teamwork.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Teamwork

    Uploaded by

    Amizan Abdullah
    This 3 sentence summary provides the key details about the rubric: The rubric assesses student teamwork on a mini project in a Brickworks and Concrete Laboratory course, evaluating their ability to assemble the project accurately and on time as well as their level of interaction and participation within the group. Students are judged on criteria such as sharing tasks equally, utilizing each member's abilities, leadership, respect for others, and time management. Scores are awarded based on demonstrated levels of poor, fair, moderate, good, and excellent teamwork.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Rubrics for Mini Project - TEAMWORK

    DCC10022 BRICKWORK AND CONCRETE LABORATORY ASSESSMENT TOOL (%) : MINI PROJECT (10%)

    CLO3 - Participate actively in a teamwork during practical PLO9 Individual and Teamwork: Function effectively as an
    activities individual, and as member in diverse technical teams

    Description of rubrics This rubrics is designed to assess student's teamwork mini project for Brickworks

    Taxonomy
    Criteria POOR (1) FAIR (2) MODERATE (3) GOOD (4) EXCELLENT (5) MARKS
    Domain(Krathwohl)

    Level Ability to assemble the mini project accurately with given time frame

    Team showed moderate


    Team showed excellent
    teamwork. Team
    Team demonstrated litle Team demonstrated fairly Team showed good teamwork. teamwork. All team
    members seldomly
    teamwork. Most work was teamwork. Most work was Most members shared the task members shared the
    shared the task equally
    done by 1 member of done by 1 or 2 member of equally and utilize abilities of each task equally and utilizing
    A3 and did not utilize 5 /5
    team. Task were team. Task were team member. Task were abilities of each team
    abilities of each team
    completed on time but completed on time but completed on time and with good member. Task were
    member. Task were
    with unsatisfactory result with unsatisfactory result result completed on time and
    completed on time and
    with great result
    with satisfactory result

    Shows outstanding
    Minimal participation; Good participation;
    leadership qualities
    Shows little interest; appears interested;
    through shared
    doesn't pay attention to enthusiastic but talks Very good participation; is
    No participation; sits on participation and respect
    Interaction with other group members; may over teammates or may respectful of others and their point
    A3 the side lines with no for others; keeps others 4 /5
    Group argue to get point across; "hog" tasks; try to help of view; makes sure that everyone
    interaction; disinterested; on task, managing time;
    helps group only when group complete tasks; gets a turn; conscious of time
    Assumes responsibility
    asked; fools around; little somewhat conscious of
    for effective functioning
    emphasis on time time
    of the group.

    TOTAL 9 / 10

    You might also like