871

PART – F

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 872

INDEX

Sl. No. Title Page No.

PART-F 871

1 Index 872

2 Layout Plan 873- 874

3 Conceptual Drawings (Indicative Only) 875- 878

4 Soil Investigation Report (Indicative Only) 879- 888

5 Rain water Harvesting drawings 889

6 Abstract of Schedule Showing Civil &Electrical 900

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 873

LAYOUT PLAN

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 874

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 875

Conceptual Drawings
(Indicative only)

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 876

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 877

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 878

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 879

REPORT ON
PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE PROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION OF 50 ROOMS
GUEST FOR UNIVERSITY OF HYDERABAD EAST CAMPUS, GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD,
TELANGANA.

FOR
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
HYDERABAD – III/4, CPWD.,
A.G. COLONY,
HYDERABAD.
KAMBHAMPATI CONSULTANTS
(NABL Accredited)
PLOT NO 9, BANK COLONY, GAYATRI NAGAR, SAHEB NAGAR, HYDERABAD
Ph : 9885716987, 7569026753 Email : kambhampaticonsultants@gmail.com

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 880

REPORT ON PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF

50 ROOMS GUEST HOUSE FOR UNIVERSITY OF HYDERABAD EAST CAMPUS AT
GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA.

INTRODUCTION :

The Assistant Executive Engineer, Hyderabad-III/4, CPWD, AG Colony, Hyderabad has

entrusted the work of conducting preliminary Soil Investigations for the Construction of
50 Rooms Gust House for University of Hyderabad East Campus at Gachibowli,
Hyderabad, Telangana. The aim of this report is to evaluate the nature and depth of the
soils and strata at the site, and to determine the safe bearing capacity of the foundations,
accordingly. The methods and procedures adopted in the soil investigations are to provide
the clients a general idea in the shortest duration possible and are in no way to replace the
detailed investigations as Per Standards. Also this report cannot be used as a legal
document as the scope of work is very limited in its nature.

PROJECT DETAILS :

The Site :

2.1.1 The site for the proposed structure is located at University of Hyderabad East Campus,
Gachibowli which is about 22 Km. from Mgbs, Hyderabad. The topography of the
site area is generally undulated and covered with rock/boulders etc., Site plan with
location of boreholes drilled at the site is given in Page No.

STRUCTURE :

As per the clients information the proposed structure is an RCC framed structure.
comprising of Ground and Two Upper Floors

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 881

:: 2 ::

Weather Conditions :

2.3.1 The weather was clear and dry during field investigations, which were carried out in the
month of April, 2022.

Seismic Zone :

2.4.1 The proposed project site is situated near Hyderabad, which falls under Seismic Zone II as
per IS 1893 (Part I) – 2002.

OBJECT OF INVESTIGATIONS :

For designing the foundation system of the proposed structure, the following data are
required :

a) Type of foundation system.

b) Depth below the ground level at which the foundation system is to be laid.

c) Allowable bearing pressure on the foundation at different depths.

To determine above factors, the following information would be required:

a) The sub soil profile indicating thickness of the various soil strata, to a depth down
to the influence zone below the foundations.

b) Engineering properties of the soil strata at various levels.

c) Physical characteristics of the soil strata.

d) Variation of the strength of the strata with depth.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 882

:: 3 ::

For evaluating the above parameters, field investigations and laboratory tests on the soil
samples collected during the field investigations have been carried out.

The results from these investigations have been analyzed to provide the recommendations
for the design of foundations.

These recommendations are valid for the investigated locations only.

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATIONS :

In order to achieve the above objectives, the scope of investigations given by the client
includes the following :

a) Drilling Two boreholes at two specified locations as shown by the clients upto a
maximum depth of 6.0M in Soils/SDR (OR) 3M into hard rock strata whichever is
more below existing groundlevel with Rotary Drilling technique as Per IS 1892.

b) Collection of Disturbed and Undisturbed soil samples in the boreholes.

c) Conducting standard penetration tests at regular intervals in the boreholes.

d) Conducting relevant laboratory tests on soil samples recovered.

e) Preparation and submission of a technical report containing the details of the tests
carried out, their analysis and recommendations regarding the foundation system
to be adopted.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 883

:: 4 ::
FIELD INVESTIGATIONS :

Preliminary Details :

Field investigations was carriedout in the month of April, 2022.

BOREHOLES :

The Boreholes was drilled at the specified locations as shown by the client.

The termination depth of the borehole are given in the following table.

Borehole Structure/Building Termination Depth Water table below the

No. from Existing GL (m) Existing GL (m)

1 3.5 Not Met

RCC Structure

Not Met
2 RCC Structure 3.0

The following operations were undertaken in the borehole.

i. Conducting standard penetration tests.

ii. Collecting undisturbed samples.

5.2.5 Disturbed soil samples recovered from the split spoon sampler were packed in polythene
bags and retained for identification purposes.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 884

:: 5 ::

Undisturbed soil samples were recovered by thin walled shell-by tubes conforming to IS
2132. These tubes had an area ratio of less than 10%.

The diameter of soil samples were 50 mm and its length was 45 cm. However in the
refusal strata samples of smaller lengths were collected as further penetration was not
practical.

The ends of sample tubes were sealed by wax to prevent loss/ ingress of moisture.

Standard Penetration tests were conducted as per IS 2131 - 1981.

LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS :

The soil samples brought to the laboratory were tested to evaluate the following
properties.

a) Type of soil and its gradation

b) Consistency limits

c) Natural density

d) Natural water content

e) Shear strength properties

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 885

:: 6 ::

In order to determine the above properties the following tests have been conducted.

a) Sieve analysis on the coarse grained soil fraction

b) Hydrometer analysis on the fine grained soil fraction

c) Liquid and plastic limits

d) Natural Density and Water Content tests

e) Triaxial Shear tests

RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS :

The results of field investigations and laboratory tests conducted on the soil
samples collected from the borehole have been presented in the form of soil profile
tables.

The soil profile tables (Table No 1) as well as the compiled soil profile (Figure 1) gives the
details of the strata including their classification and strength properties as ascertained
from the tests conducted.

The soil profile tables indicate the following :

a) Standard Penetration Test Values (i.e. N- values observed) at various depths.

b) Soil description identifying the type of soil.

c) In-situ bulk density and Water content.

d) Triaxial Shear test results.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 886

:: 7 ::

8.0 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS :

The compiled subsoil profile as determined from the results of the field and laboratory
investigations has been presented in Table 1.

An analysis of the data provided in soil profile tables indicates stratification with the
presence of the following strata in the sub soil :

1. Stratum I : Soft Disintegrated Rock

2. Stratum II : Hard Granite Rock

(Depth in m : from - to )
Bore Hole No
Stratum I Stratum II

BH1 0.0 – 0.5 0.5 – 3.5

BH 2 - 0.0 – 3.0

DESIGN CRITERIA :

Design of Foundations :

As per the clients information the proposed structure is an RCC framed structure.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 887

:: 8 ::

The design of foundation depends upon the founding strata, loading intensity at the
foundation level and configuration at loading points.

For the above conditions, Open foundations are recommended for the proposed structure.
The footings may be either isolated or combined depending upon the column loads, their
spacing and configuration.

DEPTH OF FOUNDATIONS :

Minimum depth of foundations is governed by the following factors :

a) Top loose zone.

b) Adequate depth of soil above founding level, to ensure mobilization of full

safe bearing capacity.

c) Adequate depth of soil strata below founding level of requisite strength to

mobilize the safe bearing capacity and at the same time restricts the total and
differential settlements within the allowable limits.

The actual depth of foundation shall be decided by the design engineer.

ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE :

Typical calculation for allowable bearing pressure is given in Appendix-1 may be

adopted.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 888

:: 9 ::

RECOMMENDATIONS :

a) Type of Foundations : Open

b) Type of Footing : Isolated

c) Allowable Bearing Pressure : Allowable bearing pressure as

given in the following table may
be adopted.

Foundation Strata Location Allowable Allowable

Depth Width Settlement Bearing
(m) (m) (mm) Pressure
(tons/m²)

Embedded
atleast 50cm Any width Hard Granite Rock BH 1 & 2 Nil 59
into rock

PRECAUTIONS :

Entire report should be studied before implementing the recommendations.

Loose pockets of soil if encountered shall be removed and backfilled with concrete. A
leveling course of concrete shall be laid and construction of foundations can be taken up
subsequently.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 889

:: 10 ::

LIMITATIONS :

The soil investigations have been carried out at locations in the site chosen by the client so
as to represent the entire site. The recommendations provided in this report are hence
valid only for these test locations. However, if there is any change in sub soil conditions
and properties at places between or beyond chosen test locations, Kambhampati
Consultants may be contacted for further advice.

With passage of time, the recommendations may vary due to manmade and natural
environmental changes.

REFERENCES :

A list of IS codes referred for providing the recommendations and that which might be
required to implement the same has been given in Appendix –

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 890

Name of Work : C/o 50 Rooms Guest House for University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana.

APPENDIX – 1

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF ROCK

Bore Depth (m) Specific Unit Water Compressive

Hole Gravity Weight Absorption Strength (kg/cm²)
No (gm/cc) %
0.5 – 1.5 2.84 2.92 0.14 414

1.5 – 2.5 2.85 2.93 0.13 422

BH 1

2.5 – 3.5 2.86 2.94 0.12 431

0.0 – 1.0 2.82 2.91 0.16 419

1.0 – 2.0 2.83 2.93 0.15 427

BH 2

2.0 – 3.0 2.85 2.95 0.13 430

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 891

Name of Work : C/o 50 Rooms Guest House for University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana.

APPENDIX -2

CALCULATIONS FOR BEARING PRESSURE IN HARD ROCK

Bearing Capacity = Crushing Strength of Rock / 10

The lowest value of the crushing strength of rock in all the bore holes beyond the

founding depth is to be considered for evaluating the bearing capacity. The lowest

compressive strength is 414 kg/cm².

Hence Bearing Capacity = 414/ 10

= 41.4 kg/cm²

Taking an additional factor of safety of 7 in fissured and fractured hard rock,

the safe bearing capacity = 41.4 / 7 = 5.9 kg/cm²

Therefore adopt qa = 5.9 kg/cm² = 59.0 t/m2

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 892

Name of Work : C/o 50 Rooms Guest House for University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana.

APPENDIX - 3
LIST OF IS CODES
FOR
LABORATORY TESTS

1. IS 2720 (Part 1) - 1983 : Preparation of soil samples

2. IS 2720 (Part 2) - 1973 : Determination of water content

3. IS 2720 (Part 4) - 1985 : Grain Size Analysis

4. IS 2720 (Part 5) - 1985 : Atterberg Limits

5. IS 2720 (Part 11) - 1973 : Determination of shear

Strength parameters using
triaxial shear apparatus.

FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

1. IS 1498 : 1970 : Classification and Identification

of soils for general engineering
purposes.

2. IS 1892 : 1979 : Code of practice for sub surface

investigations for foundations.

3. IS 2131 : 1981 : Method of standard penetration

test for soils.

4. IS 2132 : 1986 : Code of practice for thin walled

tube sampling of soil.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 893

Name of Work : C/o 50 Rooms Guest House for University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 894

Name of Work : C/o 50 Rooms Guest House for University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana.

FIGURE-2

COMBINED SOIL PROFILE

BH 1 BH 2

Depth (m) N-value Depth (m) N-Value

0.20 0.20

0.40 0.40
0.50
0.60 0.60 CR 81%
RQD 79%
0.80 0.80

1.00 CR 88% 1.00

RQD 88%
1.20 1.20

1.40 1.40

1.60 1.60 CR 85%

RQD 85%
1.80 CR 85% 1.80
RQD 81%
2.00 2.00

2.20 2.20

2.40 2.40 CR 67%

RQD 45%
2.60 2.60

2.80 CR 98% 2.80

RQD 98%
3.00 3.00

3.2

3.4
3.5

LEGEND:

Hard Granite Rock

Soft Disintegrated Rock

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 895

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 896

TABLE-1

SUMMARY OF SOIL PROPERTIES

Property Soil Depth Specific Water Natural Grain Size Distribution Atterberg Limits Shear Parameters
/Bore (m) Gravity Content Density (%) (%)
Hole (%) (g/cc) Gravel Sand Silt+Clay Liquid Plastic Plasticity Cohesion Φ
No. > 4.75 – < Limit Limit Index kg/sq cm degrees
4.75mm 0.075mm 0.075mm

BH 1 SDR 0.5 2.75 0.9 1.98 - - - - NP NP 0.02 33

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 897

FIGURE-3

FIELD BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET - PROFORMA SHEET NO. (1)
BORE HOLE LOCATION: BH 1
SPT Details Core

strata by field person

Depth below G.L. (m)

Visual Description of
Strata thickness (m)

Nature of sampling
Recovery

Colour of drilling
% Core recovery
Depth of sample

RQD Value (m)

Rate of drill /
Symbolic rep.
Data

30cm/min
below G.L.

Remarks
RQD, %

water
No.of Blows

15 - 30 c m

30 - 45 c m

Total length
Depth (m)

Corrected

of cores
N Value
0 - 15 cm

(m)
0.00 X X X
Soft Disintegrated
X X X DS 0.5 0.5 0% Nil Avg Yellow
Rock
0.50 0.50 X X X 53
% % %
Hard Granite Rock % % % Core 0.88 88% 0.88 88% Avg ilky White

1.50 1.00 % % % 70
% % %
Hard Granite Rock % % % Core 0.85 85% 0.81 81% Avg ilky White

2.50 1.00 % % % 71
% % %
Hard Granite Rock % % % Core 0.98 98% 0.98 98% Avg ilky White

3.50 1.00 % % % 72

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 898

FIGURE-3

FIELD BORE LOG CHART AND DATA SHEET - PROFORMA SHEET NO. (2)
BORE HOLE LOCATION: BH 2
SPT Details Core

strata by field person

Depth below G.L. (m)

Visual Description of
Strata thickness (m)

Nature of sampling
Recovery

Colour of drilling
% Core recovery
Depth of sample

RQD Value (m)

Rate of drill /
Symbolic rep.

30cm/min
Data

below G.L.

Remarks
RQD, %

water
No.of Blows

15 - 30 c m

30 - 45 c m

Total length
Depth (m)

Corrected

of cores
N Value
0 - 15 cm

(m)
0.00 % % %
Hard Granite Rock % % % Core 0.81 81% 0.79 79% Avg ilky White

1.00 1.00 % % % 79
% % %
Hard Granite Rock % % % Core 0.85 85% 0.85 85% Avg ilky White

2.00 1.00 % % % 85
% % %
Hard Granite Rock % % % Core 0.67 67% 0.45 45% Avg ilky White

3.00 1.00 % % % 45

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 899

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)

 900

Abstract of Schedule showing Civil and Electrical

Proforma for Quoting the rates
कार्य का नाम Construction of Guest House Facilities (25+25) Rooms (G+2) floors on EPC
Name of Work: basis with Civil works including Internal water supply, & Sanitary
Installations, Sewerage system, Drainage & Development of Site, External
water supply & Sewer lines, Storm water drains, UG Sump, overhead terrace
tank ,Septic tank etc., and Internal Electrical Installations, Fans, Fire fighting
& Fire Alarm, Lightening conductors, SITC of Lifts, SITC of 250 KVA substation
equipment, SITC of 125VA DGset, SITC of IP based EPABX System, Solar
water heating system, LED Street lighting, Split ACs, pump sets etc. at
Hyderabad Central University, Hyderabad.
NIT No.73/22-23/HYD-III/HYD (CE’s NIT No.39/CE-Hyd/2022-23/Hyderabad)
Estimated Cost put to tender (Rs.) Rs.22,46,93,860/-
Name of the Contractor
Sl. Name of component Estimated cost Percentage % in Figures Total Cost
No. ( Composite Tender) (Rs.) above /below or (Rs.)
at par the
Estimated Cost
1 Total cost of
Building including
Civil and Electrical Rs.22,46,93,860/-
work
Total Cost Rs. Rs.22,46,93,860/-
Important Note :
1.The tenderer is required to quote Percentage only above/below or at par on the Estimated Cost to cover all
the rates of all the items under the Schedule of Tender. This column should not be left blank, otherwise the
tender shall be treated as INVALID.

2. The tender shall be finalised based on percentage quoted by the agency to determine the L1.

3.The Percentage shall be typed only in figures upto 2 (two) places of decimal along with algebraic sign.

4. The tenderer shall enable the macros before entering the figures, to see the quoted percentage and amount
in words.

5.If the Percentage quoted both in words and figures are not clear, or if the rate is not quoted in Percentage,
the offer will be treated as INVALID.

Signature of contractor :
Name :
Date :
Postal Address :
E-mail ID :
Executive Engineer,
HYD-III, CPWD, Hyderabad.

Corrections/Omissions/Insertions – NIL AE ( C ) AE ( E ) EE (C)