This document provides an evaluation of the contributions of five group members to an English inquiry project. Each member was assigned responsibilities for different aspects of the project report and presentation. Member 1 was the group leader and was responsible for organizing the project and editing others' work. She received a 100% evaluation. The other four members—who were responsible for tasks like developing questions, writing specific sections of the report, and proofreading—also received 100% evaluations for completing their assigned work on time and incorporating feedback. The group members approved the evaluations by signing the document.
This document provides an evaluation of the contributions of five group members to an English inquiry project. Each member was assigned responsibilities for different aspects of the project report and presentation. Member 1 was the group leader and was responsible for organizing the project and editing others' work. She received a 100% evaluation. The other four members—who were responsible for tasks like developing questions, writing specific sections of the report, and proofreading—also received 100% evaluations for completing their assigned work on time and incorporating feedback. The group members approved the evaluations by signing the document.
This document provides an evaluation of the contributions of five group members to an English inquiry project. Each member was assigned responsibilities for different aspects of the project report and presentation. Member 1 was the group leader and was responsible for organizing the project and editing others' work. She received a 100% evaluation. The other four members—who were responsible for tasks like developing questions, writing specific sections of the report, and proofreading—also received 100% evaluations for completing their assigned work on time and incorporating feedback. The group members approved the evaluations by signing the document.
Group members: Nguyễn Phương Linh, Nguyễn Bùi Thái Hà, Lê Minh Dương, Nguyễn Trọng Gia Bảo, Nguyễn Diệp Anh
No. Member’s name Assigned responsibilities* Evaluation Further explanation
(out of 100%) 1 Nguyễn Phương Linh 100% She fulfilled all her ● Leader of the group duties. As a leader, she ● Design the topic and was active in assisting other members, questionnaire organizing duty roster, ● Find relevant reading supervising the quality sources of member’s work and addressing all arisen ● Designing information problems. gathering tools ● Write the Recommendations part in the report. ● Contact the teacher for instructions ● Proofreading and editing all parts of the report 2 Nguyễn Bùi Thái Hà 100% She attended group ● Actively give opinions meetings and actively in the process of interacted with the deciding the topic and leader. making questions. Her work also needs ● Making the first draft just a little editing from the leader. questions on Google Contact the instructor Form. for advice. ● Find reading materials Bring her laptop for the related to the topic and presentation day. be responsible for the References. ● Write the Introduction part in the report. ● Editing the presentation slides. 3 Lê Minh Dương 100% He completed all of the ● Give opinions in the tasks that the group question making process leader gave. ● Deliver the His work needed some editing from the leader. questionnaire to ULIS He was receptive to students peer feedback and ● Suggest some ideas for actively suggested novel the Recommendations ideas.
● Write the Method part in
the report. ● Proofread and give suggestions for the introduction and method parts of the final draft 4 Nguyễn Trọng Gia Bảo 100% He completed all the ● Give opinions and assigned tasks decently suggest ideas for making and submitted to the questions of the survey group leader before the ● Deliver the deadline. His work still needed questionnaire to ULIS some suggestions and students editing from the leader. ● Suggest ideas for the He was always in a Recommendation part proactive state to handle arisen problems ● Write the Conclusion and propose feasible part in the report. ideas. ● Proofread and give suggestions for adjustments for the Conclusion part of the final report . 5 Nguyễn Diệp Anh 100% She attended the ● Organize the Powerpoint group’s meeting. presentation Finished the assigned ● Write the Results part in parts. Work didn’t need much the report. editing. ● Summarize ideas for Striking findings ● Proof-read Results Group members’ signatures of approval: * List all the responsibilities of the member from the beginning to the end of the Inquiry Project. * The final score of each student for the written report is calculated based on the group evaluation of his/her contribution to the project. For example, if the group gets mark 9, and student A gets a group evaluation of 100%, then student A’s final score for the written project will be 9 x 100% = 9. If the group gets mark 9, and student B gets a group evaluation of 70%, then student A’s final score for the written project will be 9 x 70% = 6.3.