You are on page 1of 44

Proposal/ F/6122

Contract No.: (June 02) REV No.: R A


NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 1 of

Reference

CONTENTS
Subject Section

Introduction 2

Design Philosophy 3

Assumptions 3

Loading 3

Analysis and Design 3

References 4

Load Cases 5

Liftpoint B 6

Liftpoint G 16
Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 2 of

Reference

INTRODUCTION
Caisson C12 is in need of repair and Atkins have been contracted to provide a permanent solution. The
permanent solution comprises of 8 clamp sections which are to be installed below the Spider deck at
EL+14.000m. All clamp sections are to be cross-hauled using under-deck steelwork to provide lift points,
as can be seen in the sketch below.

Figure 1: Caisson 43-012 Clamp Repair


Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 3 of

Reference

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
Existing under-deck steel beams will be checked for combined global and local stresses induced during
cross-haul. The beam will be assessed under resulting vertical, lateral, and axial forces acting on the
bottom flange. As such, four locations on the beam cross-section will be analysed for combined stresses:
toe bending at the bottom of the beam; root bending at the bottom of the beam; web bending at bottom
root radius; and web bending at top root radius.

ASSUMPTIONS
The following assumptions have been considered as part of the design:

• A Riley Universal Superclamp will be used


• The clamp components will be transported in a container and so will not be subjected to a sea lift
• In accordance with drawing NL/S/30415, steel has been designed to the following:

Type VI U.N.O. Conservatively plate girders have also been taken as Type VI
Fy = 355 N/mm2

LOADING

Basic Loads have been calculated using weights from Atkins drawings. The following figures and factors
have been added to calculate the design weight:

• 5% Allowance for weight uncertainty


Red Rooster Data
• 60 kg rigging alowance Sheet (1 Te Air
Hoist 15m Fall)
• 1.25 Dynamic Amplification Factor (Platform lift)

The maximum component weight is 757kg based on information provided by Atkins, liftpoints will be
checked for 1Te. The worst case crosshaul is at liftpoint B.

4 pieces will be assembled and held on 2 No. restraint rigging points. The combined weight will be circa
1500kgs and conservatively assumed to be held on a single restraint point, G.

ANALYSIS & DESIGN

Beams used to support the clamps are required to be checked under cross-haul induced loading. The
beams will be analysed under the weight of the heaviest component that each Lift Point will be subject to
(refer to Loading section above). Two load cases will be considered: 100/0 and 50/50 load split between
lift points.
Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 4 of

Reference
REFERENCES

The following documents and drawings have been referenced in the compilation of these calculations:

Shell Standards

DEP 37.19.00.12 Offshore Topsides Structures


ES/006 Topside Facilities Structural Design Offshore Installations
EM/039 Guidelines for Lifting Points and Heavy Lift Criteria

Codes of Practice

AISC 360-10 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings

Platform Reference Drawings

NL/S/30415 Integrated Deck E.S.D.V Platform Secondary Steelwork Arrangement

NL/S/30416 Integrated Deck E.S.D.V Platform Secondary Steelwork Joint Details

NL/S/30417 Integrated Deck E.S.D.V Platform Plating and Grating Plan

NL/S/03000 Jacket Appurtenances Caisson General Arrangement Plans

NL/S/03006 Jacket Appurtenances Drillers Cuttings Chute Details - Sheet 1

NL/S/03011 Jacket Appurtenances Produced Water Caisson Details - Sheet 1

Atkins Drawings

5129514-DWG-ST-0001 Drawing Index, General Notes &Abbreviations


5129514-DWG-ST-0002 General Arrangement
5129514-DWG-ST-0003 Sleeve Details Sheet 1 of 2
5129514-DWG-ST-0004 Sleeve Details Sheet 2 of 2
5129514-DWG-ST-0005 Sleeve Seal Details
5129514-DWG-ST-0006 Installation Outline

Vendor References

Riley Universal Superclamp Data Sheet


Red Rooster Pneumatic Chain Hoist Data Sheet
Proposal/ F/6122
Contract No.: BCD14A (June 02) REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 1 of 162

Reference
CHECK LIFT POINT 1A

Lift Point 1A is located along the cantilevered 914x305UB that runs in an east-west direction 5500mm
south of Gridline 7. The cross haul operation is along the length of the beam so no transverse effects will
be involved. Note that this lift point will not be subject to Load Condition 3.

b a L2

L L1

h
g e

Ft

10000kg
INPUT DATA

Static Weight, W = 10000 kg Rigging Allowance, Ra = 300 kg


D.A.F = 1.25 Weight Allowance, Wa = 5% W
Span of Beam, L = 9.00 m Section Size, 610x229x113 UB
Point Load End Distance, a = 2.4 m S 355 Steel grade
Steel Grade, unknown. Assumed
Point Load End Distance, b = 6.6 m Modulus of Elasticity E = 205000 N/mm² to be 235 N/mm²
as a conservative
Lift Point Spacing Transverse, L1 = 3.5 m Height of Beam, D = 607.6 mm measure.
Lift Point Spacing Longitudinal, L2 = 0.001 m Flange Width, B = 228.2 mm
Height of Lift Below Support, h = 4.808 m Flange Thickness, T = 17.3 mm
Centre of Clamp Bearing Points g = 303.3 mm Web Thickness, t = 11.1 mm
Width of Beam Clamp, w = 75 mm Root Radius, r = 12.7 mm
Load Eccentricity from Flange e = 150 mm Radius of Gyration y-y ry = 48.8 mm
Unbraced Length Lb = 2600 mm Depth Between Fillets, d = 547.6 mm
Bottom Flange Restrained at Support Yes Elastic Modulus, Sx = 2874 cm3
Top Flange Restrained by Deck Plate No Plastic Modulus, Zx = 3281 cm3
2nd Moment of Area Ix = 87318 cm4
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 2 of 162

Reference
CHECK LOAD CONDITION 1

Load Condition 1 occurs when the load is directly below the lift point, so the applied load is the full weight
API RP 2A-WSD
applied vertically only. Assume that the existing beam is 75% utilised. As the lift point is a temporary load,
an allowable overstress of ⅓ can be adopted. Therefore limit stresses induced by the lift point only to ⅓ + Cl 3.1.2
0.25 of the allowable stress (= 0.583 Fy).

Take Fy = 0.583 Fy = 0.583x345 = 201 N/mm2

Wh = (W + Wa) x D.A.F + Ra = (10000+500)x1.25 + 300 = 13425 kg


= 131.7 kN

CHECK MAJOR AXIS SHEAR

Vmax = Wh = 131.7 kN

Ωv = 1.5 Cv = 1.0 Aw = d∙t = 607.6 x 11.1 = 6744.4 mm2

AISC 360-10

0.6Fy∙Aw∙Cv 0.6x201x6744.36x1 Cl G2.1


Vn = = = 542.25 kN ≥ Vmax = 131.7 kN Therefore OK
Ωv 1.5 OK

CHECK MAJOR AXIS BENDING

Mmax = Wh x a = 131.7 x 2.4 = 316.1 kNm

NOTE:- ADD LTB CHECKS

Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 201 N/mm2 Zx = 3281000 mm3

Fy∙Zx 201 x 3281000 Cl F2.1


Mn = = = 394.9 kNm ≥ Mmax = 316.1 kNm Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK

CHECK LATERAL TORSIONAL BUCKLING

Lb < Lp THEREFORE LTB


Lp = 1.76ry√(E/Fy) = 1.76 * 48.8 √(205000/201) = 2743.0 mm DOES NOT APPLY (F2-5)
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 3 of 162

Reference

CHECK FLANGE LOCAL BENDING

g-t 303.3 - 11.1


l = -r = - 12.7 = 133 mm
2 2

l 133
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 268 mm

min(s ; b)
tan30 tan30

268
[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (268+268) x 17.3²
Zf = = = 40105 mm3

75
4 4

min(s ; a)
NOTE:-

268
Assume 30% of Load is taken through web due to clamp friction
and remaining 70% is through contact with toe of the flange.

0.7 x Wh 0.7x131.7
Mf = xl = x 133 = 6.1 kNm
2 2

133
Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 201 N/mm2

Fy∙Zf 201 x 40105 Cl F11.1


Mn = = = 4.8 kNm ≤ Mf = 6.1 kNm Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS

CHECK COMBINED BENDING STRESSES

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic analysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

Mmax = 316.1 kNm Sx = 2874000 mm3 Ωb = 1.67

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (268+268) x 17.3²


Mf = 6.1 kNm Sf = = = 26737 mm3
6 6

Mmax 316.1x10⁶
fb = = = 110 N/mm2
Sx 2874000

Mf 6.1x10⁶
fbf = = = 228.1 N/mm2
Sf 26737

fbc = (fbf2 + fbf∙fb + fb2)0.5 = (228.1² + 228.1x110 + 110²)⁰˙⁵ = 298.7 N/mm


2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 298.7 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 4 of 162

Reference
CHECK LOAD CONDITION 2

Load Condition 2 occurs when the load is halfway between two lift points, so the applied load has a
vertical component and also one or two horizontal components, depending on the direction of cross-haul.
Assume that the existing beam is 75% utilised. As the lift point is a temporary load, an allowable API RP 2A-WSD
overstress of ⅓ can be adopted. Therefore limit stresses induced by the lift point only to ⅓ + 0.25 of the
allowable stress (= 0.583 Fy). Cl 3.1.2

70°

3.5
0.001

4.808

3.5
10000kg

Take Fy = 0.583 Fy = 0.583x345 = 201 N/mm2


Shell ERD EM/039

Cl 2.1

Wh = (W + Wa) x D.A.F + Ra
= (10000+500)x1.25 + 300
= 13425 kg = 131.7 kN

Fl
Ft

L3 = (L12 + L22)0.5 = (3.5² + 0.001²)⁰˙⁵ = 3.5 m


Fv

α = tan-1(L2/L1) = tan¯¹(0.001/3.5) = 0°

β = tan-1(h/(L3/2)) = tan¯¹(4.808/1.7 = 70 °
5)

Wh/2 131.7/2
F = = = 70.1 kN (Force in Sling)
sin β sin 70

Fv = Wh/2 = 131.7/2 = 65.9 kN

Ft = F cos β cos α = 70.1 cos70 cos0 = 24 kN

Fl = F cos β sin α = 70.1 cos70 sin0 = 0 kN


Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 5 of 162

Reference

CHECK MAJOR AXIS SHEAR

Vmax = Fv = 65.9 kN

AISC 360-10
Ωv = 1.5 Cv = 1.0 Aw = d∙t = 607.6 x 11.1 = 6744.4 mm 2
Cl G2.1

0.6Fy∙Aw∙Cv 0.6x201x6744.36x1
Vn = = = 542.2 kN ≥ Vmax = 65.9 kN Therefore OK
Ωv 1.5 OK

CHECK MAJOR AXIS BENDING

Mmax = Fv x a = 65.9 x 2.4 = 158.2 kNm

NOTE:- Lp < Lb THEREFORE LTB DOES NOT APPLY. (SEE PAGE 2/2)

Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 201 N/mm2 Zx = 3281000 mm3

Fy∙Zx 201 x 3281000 Cl F2.1


Mn = = = 394.9 kNm ≥ Mmax = 158.2 kNm Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 1

Check combined effects of Fv, Fl and Ft at location 1. Assume Fl is resisted by bottom flange only.

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

NOTE:- Lp < Lb THEREFORE LTB DOES NOT APPLY

g-t 303.3 - 11.1


l = -r = - 12.7 = 133 mm
2 2

l 133
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 268 mm
tan30 tan30

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (268+268) x 17.3²


Sf = = = 26737 mm3
6 6

Af = B∙T = 228.2x17.3 = 3948 mm2


Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 6 of 162

Reference
Mmax = 158.2 kNm Sx = 2874000 mm 3
Ωb = 1.67

Ft∙e 24 x 150
Fc = = = 11.9 kN
g 303.3

Assume 30% of Load is taken through web due to clamp friction and
NOTE:- remaining 70% is through contact with toe of the flange.

Mf = (Fc + 0.7Fv/2) x l = (11.9 + 0.7x65.9/2) x 133 = 4.7 kNm

min(s ; b)
268
Mmax 158.2x10⁶
fb = = = 55 N/mm2
Sx 2874000

75

min(s ; a)
Mf 4.7x10⁶

268
fbf = = = 175.8 N/mm2
Sf 26737

Fl 0x10³
fa = = = 0 N/mm2
Af 3948

133
fbc = (f + fbf∙(fb + fa)+ (fb + fa) )
bf
2 2 0.5

= (175.8² + 175.8x(55 + 0) + (55 + 0)²)⁰˙⁵


= 209 N/mm2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 209 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 2

Assume that lateral load is transferred back to supports via bending of the bottom flange

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic section
properties.

NOTE:- Lp < Lb THEREFORE LTB DOES NOT APPLY

Mmax = 158.2 kNm Sx = 2874000 mm3 Ωb = 1.67

My = Ft x a = 24 x 2.4 = 57.6 kNm

T∙B2 = 17.3x228.2²
Sflange = = 150150.28 mm3
6 6
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 7 of 162

Reference
Mmax 158.2 x10⁶
fb = = = 55 N/mm2
Sx 2874000

My 57.6 x10⁶
fby = = = 383.6 N/mm2
Sflange 150150.28

Fl 0x10³
fa = = = 0 N/mm2
Af 3948

fbc = fb + fby+ fa
= 55 + 383.6 + 0
= 438.6 N/mm2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 438.6 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 3

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic section
properties.

NOTE:- Lp < Lb THEREFORE LTB DOES NOT APPLY

290

0
29

75
146
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 8 of 162

Reference

g-t 303.3 - 11.1


l = = = 146 mm
2 2

l 146
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 290 mm
tan30 tan30

d 547.6
y = = = 274 mm
2 2

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]t2 (290 + 290) x 11.1²


Zweb = = = 11910 mm3
6 6

Mmax = 158.2 kNm Ix = 873180000 mm4 Ωb = 1.67

Mweb = Ft∙(e+T+r) = 24 x (150 + 17.3 + 12.7) x10¯³ = 4.3 kNm

Mmax∙y 158.2 x10⁶ x 274


fb = = = 49.6 N/mm2
Ix 873180000

Mweb 4.3 x10⁶


fb,web = = = 361 N/mm2
Zweb 11910

fbc = (fb,web2 + fb,web∙fb+ fb2)0.5


= (361² + (361x49.6) + 49.6²)⁰˙⁵
= 388 N/mm2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 388 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 9 of 162

Reference

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 4

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic section
properties.

NOTE:- Lp < Lb THEREFORE LTB DOES NOT APPLY

y = 274 mm Ix = 873180000 mm4

Mmax = 158.2 kNm Ωb = 1.67

Mweb = Ft∙(e+T+r+d) = 24 x (150+17.3+12.7+547.6) x10¯³ = 17.5 kNm

0
126

0
126
!
UE
VAL
#
4
:50
Err

75

70
6

g-t 303.3 - 11.1


l = +r+d = + 12.7 + 547.6 = 706 mm
2 2

l 706
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 1260 mm
tan30 tan30

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]t2 (1260 + 1260) x 11.1²


Zweb = = = 51748 mm3
6 6
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 1A (CLAMP) Sheet: 2 / 10 of 162

Reference
Mmax∙y 158.2 x10⁶ x 274
fb = = = 49.6 N/mm2
Ix 873180000

Mweb 17.5 x10⁶


fb,web = = = 338.2 N/mm2
Zweb 51748

fbc = (fb,web2 + fb,web∙fb+ fb2)0.5


= (338.2² + (338.2x49.6) + 49.6²)⁰˙⁵
= 366 N/mm2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 366 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS

CONCLUSION

Beam FAILS some checks and is therefore unsuitable to be used for the required lifting point. An
alternative lift point should be used or the hook load should be reduced.
Proposal/ F/6122
Contract No.: BCD14A (June 02) REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 91 of 178

Reference
CHECK LIFT POINT 1A

Lift Point 14A is along the IPE 450 that runs in an east-west direction 2680mm north of Gridline 6. The
cross-haul direction is perpendicular to the beam over to LP 16A.

b a

L2
L L1

(a > b)

h
g e

Ft

10000kg
INPUT DATA

Static Weight, W = 10000 kg Rigging Allowance, Ra = 300 kg


D.A.F = 1.25 Weight Allowance, Wa = 5% W

Span of Beam, L = 7.25 m Section Size, 610x229x113 UB


Point Load End Distance, a = 5.213 m Steel Grade, S 355
Point Load End Distance, b = 2.037 m Height of Beam, D = 607.6 mm
Lift Point Spacing Transverse, L1 = 3.72 m Flange Width, B = 228.2 mm
Lift Point Spacing Longitudinal, L2 = 0.5 m Flange Thickness, T = 17.3 mm
Height of Lift Below Support, h = 6 m Web Thickness, t = 11.1 mm
Centre of Clamp Bearing Points g = 190 mm Weld Size r = 12.7 mm (Weld Size Assumed)
Width of Beam Clamp, w = 75 mm Depth Between Welds, d = 547.6 mm
Load Eccentricity from Flange e = 150 mm Elastic Modulus, Sx = 2874 cm3
Bottom Flange Restrained at Support Yes Plastic Modulus, Zx = 3281 cm3
Top Flange Restrained by Deck Plate Yes 2nd Moment of Area Ix = 87318 cm4
Additional Plate Thickness tp = 20 mm Bolt Size, M = 20
Bolt Back Mark BM = 90 mm No. Bolts per Side n = 4
Bolt Centres p = 140 mm
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 92 of 178

Reference
CHECK LOAD CONDITION 1

Load Condition 1 occurs when the load is directly below the lift point, so the applied load is the full weight
API RP 2A-WSD
applied vertically only. Assume that the existing beam is 75% utilised. As the lift point is a temporary load,
an allowable overstress of ⅓ can be adopted. Therefore limit stresses induced by the lift point only to ⅓ + Cl 3.1.2
0.25 of the allowable stress (= 0.583 Fy).

Take Fy = 0.583 Fy = 0.583x345 = 201 N/mm2

Wh = (W + Wa) x D.A.F + Ra = (10000+500)x1.25 + 300 = 13425 kg


= 131.7 kN

CHECK MAJOR AXIS SHEAR

Wh x a 131.7x5.213
Vmax = = = 94.7 kN
L
7.25

Ωv = 1.5 Cv = 1.0 Aw = d∙t = 607.6 x 11.1 = 6744.4 mm2

AISC 360-10

0.6Fy∙Aw∙Cv 0.6x201x6744.36x1 Cl G2.1


Vn = = = 542.25 kN ≥ Vmax = 94.7 kN Therefore OK
Ωv 1.5 OK

CHECK MAJOR AXIS BENDING

Wh x a x b 131.7x5.213x2.037
Mmax = = = 192.9 kNm
L
7.25

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 201 N/mm2 Zx = 3281000 mm3

Fy∙Zx 201 x 3281000 Cl F2.1


Mn = = = 394.9 kNm ≥ Mmax = 192.9 kNm Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 93 of 178

Reference

CHECK FLANGE LOCAL BENDING

g-t 190 - 11.1


l = -r = - 12.7 = 77 mm
2 2

l 77
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 171 mm

min(s ; b)
tan30 tan30

171
[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (171+171) x 17.3²
Zf = = = 25589 mm3

75
4 4

min(s ; a)
NOTE:-

171
Assume 30% of Load is taken through web due to clamp friction
and remaining 70% is through contact with toe of the flange.

0.7 x Wh 0.7x131.7
Mf = xl = x 77 = 3.5 kNm
2 2

77
Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 201 N/mm2

Fy∙Zf 201 x 25589 Cl F11.1


Mn = = = 3.1 kNm ≤ Mf = 3.5 kNm Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS

CHECK COMBINED BENDING STRESSES

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

Mmax = 192.9 kNm Sx = 2874000 mm3 Ωb = 1.67

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (171+171) x 17.3²


Mf = 3.5 kNm Sf = = = 17060 mm3
6 6

Mmax 192.9x10⁶
fb = = = 67.1 N/mm2
Sx 2874000

Mf 3.5x10⁶
fbf = = = 205.2 N/mm2
Sf 17060

fbc = (fbf2 + fbf∙fb + fb2)0.5 = (205.2² + 205.2x67.1 + 67.1²)⁰˙⁵ = 245.7 N/mm


2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 245.7 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 94 of 178

Reference
Try Bolting a plate to the underside of the flange to stiffen it. Assume that the plate is subject to local
transverse bending only and that the beam is subject to major axis bending and local transverse bending
form bolt tension. Try a 20 mm thick plate

CHECK PLATE LOCAL BENDING

Ωb = 1.67

Fy = 201 N/mm2 190

124
75

90

124
g - BM 190 - 90
l = = = 50 mm
2 2

l 2x50
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 124 mm
tan30 tan30
50

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]tp2 (124+124) x 20²


Sf = = = 16533 mm3
6 6

B∙tp2 228.2 x 20²


Sp = = = 15213 mm3
6 6

NOTE:- Assume 30% of Load is taken through web due to clamp friction and remaining 70% is through
contact with toe of the flange.

0.7 x Wh 0.7x131.7
Mf = xl = x 50 = 2.3 kNm
2 2

0.7 x Wh x p 0.7x131.7x140x10¯³
Mp = = = 3.2 kNm
4 2
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 95 of 178

Reference
Mp 3.2x10⁶
fbp = = = 210.3 N/mm2
Sp 15213

Mf 2.3x10⁶
fbf = = = 139.1 N/mm2
Sf 16533

fbc = (fbf2 + fbf∙fbp + fbp2)0.5 = (139.1² + 139.1x210.3 + 210.3²)⁰˙⁵ = 304.7 N/mm


2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 304.7 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS

CHECK COMBINED BENDING STRESSES IN FLANGE

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic


anlysis, hence check using elastic section properties.

171
BM - t 90 - 11.1
l = -r = - 12.7 = 27 mm
2 2
248

l 27
171
s = + 248/2 = + 248/2 = 171 mm
tan30 tan30

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (171+171) x 17.3²


Sf = = = 17060 mm3
6 6

27
Mmax = 192.9 kNm Sx = 2874000 mm 3
Ωb = 1.67

0.7 x Wh 0.7x131.7
Mf = xl = x 27 = 1.2 kNm
2 2

Mmax 192.9x10⁶
fb = = = 67.1 N/mm2
Sx 2874000

Mf 1.2x10⁶
fbf = = = 70.3 N/mm2
Sf 17060

fbc = (fbf2 + fbf∙fb + fb2)0.5 = (70.3² + 70.3x67.1 + 67.1²)⁰˙⁵ = 119 N/mm2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 119 N/mm2 Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 96 of 178

Reference

CHECK COMBINED BENDING STRESSES IN FLANGE FROM INDIVIDUAL BOLT TENSION

Centres are greater than 2l/tan30 therfore check bending due to individual bolt tension

0.7∙Wh 0.7x131.7
FT,bolt = = = 11.5 kN Ωb = 1.67
2∙n 2x4

2l 2x27 b∙T2 94 x 17.3²


b = = = 94 mm Sf = = = 4689 mm3
tan 30 tan 30 6 6

Mf = FT,bolt x l = 11.5x27x10¯³ = 0.3 kNm

fb = 67.1 N/mm2

Mf 0.3x10⁶
fbf = = = 64 N/mm2
Sf 4689

fbc = (fbf2 + fbf∙fb + fb2)0.5 = (64² + 64x67.1 + 67.1²)⁰˙⁵ = 113.5 N/mm


2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 113.5 N/mm2 Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 97 of 178

Reference
CHECK LOAD CONDITION 2

Load Condition 2 occurs when the load is halfway between two lift points, so the applied load has a
vertical component and also one or two horizontal components, depending on the direction of cross-haul.
Assume that the existing beam is 75% utilised. As the lift point is a temporary load, an allowable API RP 2A-WSD
overstress of ⅓ can be adopted. Therefore limit stresses induced by the lift point only to ⅓ + 0.25 of the
allowable stress (= 0.583 Fy). Cl 3.1.2

73°
3. 7
5
0.5

3.72
10000kg

Take Fy = 0.583 Fy = 0.583x345 = 201 N/mm2


Shell ERD EM/039

Cl 2.1

Wh = (W + Wa) x D.A.F + Ra
= (10000+500)x1.25 + 300
= 13425 kg = 131.7 kN

Fl
Ft

L3 = (L12 + L22)0.5 = (3.72² + 0.5²)⁰˙⁵ = 3.75 m


Fv

α = tan-1(L2/L1) = tan¯¹(0.5/3.72) = 8°

β = tan-1(L3/h) = tan¯¹(3.75/6) = 73 °

Wh/2 131.7/2
F = = = 68.9 kN (Force in Sling)
sin β sin 73

Fv = Wh/2 = 131.7/2 = 65.9 kN

Ft F cos β cos α 68.9 cos73 cos8 Take Ft /2 due to


= = = 10 kN scaffold restraints
2 2 2

Fl = F cos β sin α = 68.9 cos73 sin8 = 2.8 kN


Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 98 of 178

Reference

CHECK MAJOR AXIS SHEAR

Fv x a 65.9x5.213
Vmax = = = 47.4 kN
L
7.25
AISC 360-10
Ωv = 1.5 Cv = 1.0 Aw = d∙t = 607.6 x 11.1 = 6744.4 mm 2
Cl G2.1

0.6Fy∙Aw∙Cv 0.6x201x6744.36x1
Vn = = = 542.2 kN ≥ Vmax = 47.4 kN Therefore OK
Ωv 1.5 OK

CHECK MAJOR AXIS BENDING

Fv x a x b 65.9x5.213x2.037
Mmax = = = 96.5 kNm
L 7.25

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 201 N/mm2 Zx = 3281000 mm3

Fy∙Zx 201 x 3281000 Cl F2.1


Mn = = = 394.9 kNm ≥ Mmax = 96.5 kNm Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 1

Check combined effects of Fv, Fl and Ft at location 1. Assume Fl is resisted by bottom flange only.

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

g-t 190 - 11.1


l = -r = - 12.7 = 77 mm
2 2

l 77
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 171 mm
tan30 tan30

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (171+171) x 17.3²


Sf = = = 17060 mm3
6 6

Af = B∙T = 228.2x17.3 = 3948 mm2


Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 99 of 178

Reference
Mmax = 96.5 kNm Sx = 2874000 mm 3
Ωb = 1.67

Ft∙e 10 x 150
Fc = = = 7.9 kN
g 190

Assume 30% of Load is taken through web due to clamp friction and
NOTE:- remaining 70% is through contact with toe of the flange.

Mf = (Fc + 0.7Fv/2) x l = (7.9 + 0.7x65.9/2) x 77 = 2.4 kNm

min(s ; b)
171
Mmax 96.5x10⁶
fb = = = 33.6 N/mm2
Sx 2874000

75

min(s ; a)
Mf 2.4x10⁶

171
fbf = = = 140.7 N/mm2
Sf 17060

Fv 2.8x10³
fa = = = 0.7 N/mm2
Af 3948

77
fbc = (f + fbf∙(fb + fa)+ (fb + fa) )
bf
2 2 0.5

= (140.7² + 140.7x(33.6 + 0.7) + (33.6 + 0.7)²)⁰˙⁵


= 161 N/mm2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 161 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 2

Assume that lateral load is transferred back to supports via bending of the bottom flange

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic section
properties.

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

Mmax = 96.5 kNm Sx = 2874000 mm3 Ωb = 1.67

Ft x a x b 10x5.213x2.037
My = = = 14.6 kNm
L 7.25

T∙B2 = 17.3x228.2²
Sflange = = ### mm3
6 6
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 100 of 178

Reference
Mmax 96.5 x10⁶
fb = = = 33.6 N/mm2
Sx 2874000

My 14.6 x10⁶
fby = = = 97.2 N/mm2
Sflange 150150.28

Fv 2.8x10³
fa = = = 0.7 N/mm2
Af 3948

fbc = fb + fby+ fa
= 33.6 + 97.2 + 0.7
= 131.5 N/mm2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 131.5 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 3

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic section
properties.

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

192

2
19

75
89
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 101 of 178

Reference

g-t 190 - 11.1


l = = = 89 mm
2 2

l 89
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 192 mm
tan30 tan30

d 547.6
y = = = 274 mm
2 2

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]t2 (192 + 192) x 11.1²


Zweb = = = 7885 mm3
6 6

Mmax = 96.5 kNm Ix = 873180000 mm4 Ωb = 1.67

Mweb = Ft∙e = 10 x 150 x10¯³ = 1.5 kNm

Mmax∙y 96.5 x10⁶ x 274


fb = = = 30.3 N/mm2
Ix 873180000

Mweb 1.5 x10⁶


fb,web = = = 190.2 N/mm2
Zweb 7885

fbc = (fb,web2 + fb,web∙fb+ fb2)0.5


= (190.2² + (190.2x30.3) + 30.3²)⁰˙⁵
= 207 N/mm2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 207 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 102 of 178

Reference

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 4

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic section
properties.

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

y = 274 mm Ix = 873180000 mm4

Mmax = 96.5 kNm Ωb = 1.67

Mweb = Ft∙(e + d) = 10 x (150 + 547.6) x10¯³ = 7 kNm

3
116

3
116
!
UE
VAL
#
4
:50
Err

75

65
0

g-t 190 - 11.1


l = +r+d = + 12.7 + 547.6 = 650 mm
2 2

l + w/2 650
s = = + 75/2 = 1163 mm
tan30 tan30

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]t2 (1163 + 1163) x 11.1²


Zweb = = = 47764 mm3
6 6
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10, LIFT POINT 14A (SLEEVE) Sheet: 2 / 103 of 178

Reference
Mmax∙y 96.5 x10⁶ x 274
fb = = = 30.3 N/mm2
Ix 873180000

Mweb 7 x10⁶
fb,web = = = 146.6 N/mm2
Zweb 47764

fbc = (fb,web2 + fb,web∙fb+ fb2)0.5


= (146.6² + (146.6x30.3) + 30.3²)⁰˙⁵
= 164 N/mm2

Fy 201 Cl F1
Fb = = = 120 N/mm2 ≤ fbc = 164 N/mm2 Therefore FAILS
Ωb 1.67 FAILS

CONCLUSION

Beam FAILS some checks and is therefore unsuitable to be used for the required lifting point. An
alternative lift point should be used or the hook load should be reduced.
Proposal/ F/6122
Contract No.: BCD14A (June 02) REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 14A Sheet: 2 / 91 of 162

Reference
CHECK LIFT POINT 1A (4 SLING LIFT)

Lift Point 14A is along the IPE450 that runs in an east-west direction 2680mm to the north of Gridline 6.
The lift point is part of a 4 point lift used when installing the clamp in to it's final position.

b a L2

L L1

(a > b)

h
g e

Ft

10000kg
INPUT DATA

Static Weight, W = 10000 kg Rigging Allowance, Ra = 300 kg


D.A.F = 1.25 Weight Allowance, Wa = 5% W

Span of Beam, L = 7.25 m Section Size, 914x419x388 UB


Point Load End Distance, a = 4.6 m Steel Grade, S 235
Point Load End Distance, b = 2.65 m Height of Beam, D = 921 mm
Lift Point Spacing Transverse, L1 = N/A m Flange Width, B = 420.5 mm
Lift Point Spacing Longitudinal, L2 = N/A m Flange Thickness, T = 36.6 mm
Height of Lift Below Support, h = 9 m Web Thickness, t = 21.4 mm
Centre of Clamp Bearing Points g = 190 mm Weld Size r = 24.1 mm
Width of Beam Clamp, w = 75 mm Depth Between Welds, d = 799.6 mm
Load Eccentricity from Flange e = 150 mm Elastic Modulus, Sx = 15627 cm3
Bottom Flange Restrained at Support Yes Plastic Modulus, Zx = 17665 cm3
Top Flange Restrained by Deck Plate Yes 2nd Moment of Area Ix = 719635 cm4
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 14A Sheet: 2 / 92 of 162

Reference
CHECK LOAD CONDITION 3

Load Condition 3 occurs when the load is suspended between four lift points, so the applied load has a
vertical component and two horizontal components. Assume that the existing beam is 75% utilised. As the
lift point is a temporary load, an allowable overstress of ⅓ can be adopted. Therefore limit stresses API RP 2A-WSD
induced by the lift point only to ⅓ + 0.25 of the allowable stress (= 0.583 Fy).
Cl 3.1.2

Take Fy = 0.583 Fy = 0.583x225 = 131 N/mm2

Wh = (W + Wa) x D.A.F + Ra Shell ERD EM/039

= (10000+500)x1.25 + 300 Cl 2.1

= 13425 kg = 131.7 kN

F = 6.6 kN (Force in Sling)

Fl
Fv = 6.4 kN Ft

Ft = 1.2 kN Fv

Fl = 0.8 kN

17A
16A

15A

14A
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 14A Sheet: 2 / 93 of 162

Reference

CHECK MAJOR AXIS SHEAR

Fv x a 6.4x4.6
Vmax = = = 4.1 kN
L
7.25
AISC 360-10
Ωv = 1.5 Cv = 1.0 Aw = d∙t = 921 x 21.4 = 19709 mm 2
Cl G2.1

0.6Fy∙Aw∙Cv 0.6x131x19709.4x1
Vn = = = 1032.8 kN ≥ Vmax = 4.1 kN Therefore OK
Ωv 1.5 OK

CHECK MAJOR AXIS BENDING

Fv x a x b 6.4x4.6x2.65
Mmax = = = 10.8 kNm
L 7.25

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 131 N/mm2 Zx = 17665000 mm3

Fy∙Zx 131 x 17665000 Cl F2.1


Mn = = = 1385.7 kNm ≥ Mmax = 10.8 kNm Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 1

Check combined effects of Fv, Fl and Ft at location 1. Assume Fl is resisted by bottom flange only.

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic analysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

g-t 190 - 21.4


l = -r = - 24.1 = 60 mm
2 2

l 60
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 141 mm
tan30 tan30

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (141+141) x 36.6²


Sf = = = 62959 mm3
6 6

Af = B∙T = 420.5x36.6 = 15390 mm2


Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 14A Sheet: 2 / 94 of 162

Reference
Mmax = 10.8 kNm Sx = 15627000 mm 3
Ωb = 1.67

Ft∙e 1.2 x 150


Fc = = = 0.9 kN
g 190

Assume 30% of Load is taken through web due to clamp friction and
NOTE:- remaining 70% is through contact with toe of the flange.

Mf = (Fc + 0.7Fv/2) x l = (0.9 + 0.7x6.4/2) x 60 = 0.2 kNm

min(s ; b)
141
Mmax 10.8x10⁶
fb = = = 0.7 N/mm2
Sx 15627000

75

min(s ; a)
Mf 0.2x10⁶

141
fbf = = = 3.2 N/mm2
Sf 62959

Fv 0.8x10³
fa = = = 0.1 N/mm2
Af 15390

60
fbc = (f + fbf∙(fb + fa)+ (fb + fa) )
bf
2 2 0.5

= (3.2² + 3.2x(0.7 + 0.1) + (0.7 + 0.1)²)⁰˙⁵


= 4 N/mm2

Fy 131 Cl F1
Fb = = = 78 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 4 N/mm2 Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 2

Assume that lateral load is transferred back to supports via bending of the bottom flange

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic analysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

Mmax = 10.8 kNm Sx = 15627000 mm3 Ωb = 1.67

Ft x a x b 1.2x4.6x2.65
My = = = 2 kNm
L 7.25

T∙B2 = 36.6x420.5²
Sflange = = 1078603.5 mm3
6 6
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 14A Sheet: 2 / 95 of 162

Reference
Mmax 10.8 x10⁶
fb = = = 0.7 N/mm2
Sx 15627000

My 2 x10⁶
fby = = = 1.9 N/mm2
Sflange 1078603.5

Fv 0.8x10³
fa = = = 0.1 N/mm2
Af 15390

fbc = fb + fby+ fa
= 0.7 + 1.9 + 0.1
= 2.7 N/mm2

Fy 131 Cl F1
Fb = = = 78 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 2.7 N/mm2 Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 3

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic analysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

225

5
22

75
108
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 14A Sheet: 2 / 96 of 162

Reference

g-t 190 - 21.4


l = +r = + 24.1 = 108 mm
2 2

l 108
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 225 mm
tan30 tan30

d 799.6
y = = = 400 mm
2 2

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]t2 (225 + 225) x 21.4²


Zweb = = = 34347 mm3
6 6

Mmax = 10.8 kNm Ix = 7196350000 mm4 Ωb = 1.67

Mweb = Ft∙(e+T+r) = 1.2x(150+36.6+24.1)x10¯³ = 0.3 kNm

Mmax∙y 10.8 x10⁶ x 400


fb = = = 0.6 N/mm2
Ix 7196350000

Mweb 0.3 x10⁶


fb,web = = = 8.7 N/mm2
Zweb 34347

fbc = (fb,web2 + fb,web∙fb+ fb2)0.5


= (8.7² + (8.7x0.6) + 0.6²)⁰˙⁵
= 9 N/mm2

Fy 131 Cl F1
Fb = = = 78 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 9 N/mm2 Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 14A Sheet: 2 / 97 of 162

Reference

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 4

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic analysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

NOTE:- Top Flange is welded to deck plate, therefore LTB checks are not required.

y = 400 mm Ix = 7196350000 mm4

Mmax = 10.8 kNm Ωb = 1.67

Mweb = Ft∙(e + d) = 1.2 x (150 + 799.6) x10¯³ = 1.1 kNm

0
161

0
161

EF!
#R
EF!
#R

75

90
8

g-t 190 - 21.4


l = +r+d = + 24.1 + 799.6 = 908 mm
2 2

l 908
s = + w/2 = + 75/2 = 1610 mm
tan30 tan30

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]t2 (1610 + 1610) x 21.4²


Zweb = = = 245772 mm3
6 6
Proposal/
Contract No.: BCD14A REV No.: R A

Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: BRENT C Check

Subject: BRENT CHARLIE CONDUCTOR REPAIRS Appr.


CONDUCTOR 10 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE, LIFT POINT 14A Sheet: 2 / 98 of 162

Reference
Mmax∙y 10.8 x10⁶ x 400
fb = = = 0.6 N/mm2
Ix 7196350000

Mweb 1.1 x10⁶


fb,web = = = 4.5 N/mm2
Zweb 245772

fbc = (fb,web2 + fb,web∙fb+ fb2)0.5


= (4.5² + (4.5x0.6) + 0.6²)⁰˙⁵
= 5 N/mm2

Fy 131 Cl F1
Fb = = = 78 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 5 N/mm2 Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 OK

CONCLUSION

Beam passes all checks and is therefore suitable to be used for the required lifting point
Proposal/ F/6122
Contract No.: (June 02) REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 6 of

Reference
CHECK LIFT POINT B

Lift Point B is located along the 305x165x54 UB that runs in an East-West direction 2900mm North of
Gridline 30. The clamps are cross-hauled from lift point B to lift point D in a direction diagonal to the span
of the beam.

b a L2

L L1

(a > b)

h
g e

Ft

1000kg
INPUT DATA

Static Weight, W = 1000 kg Rigging Allowance, Ra = 60 kg Red Rooster Data


= 1.25 Wa = 5% Sheet
D.A.F Weight Allowance, W

Span of Beam, L = 4.5 m Section Size, 305x165x54 UB


Point Load End Distance, a = 3.5 m Steel Grade, S 355
Point Load End Distance, b = 1 m Height of Beam, D = 310.4 mm
Lift Point Spacing Transverse, L1 = 2.5 m Flange Width, B = 166.9 mm
Lift Point Spacing Longitudinal, L2 = 1.445 m Flange Thickness, T = 13.7 mm
Height of Lift Below Support, h = 10 m Web Thickness, t = 7.9 mm
Centre of Clamp Bearing Points g = 166.9 mm Weld Size r = 8.9 mm Riley Data Sheet:
Width of Beam Clamp, w = 70 mm Depth Between Welds, d = 265.2 mm (w = C)
Load Eccentricity from Flange e = 128 mm Elastic Modulus, Sx = 754 cm3 (e = G + J)
Bottom Flange Restrained at Support No Plastic Modulus, Zx = cm846 3

Top Flange Restrained by Deck Plate No 2nd Moment of Area Ix = 11696 cm4
Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 7 of

Reference
CHECK LOAD CONDITION 1

Load Condition 1 occurs when the load is directly below the lift point, so the applied load is the full weight
API RP 2A-WSD
applied vertically only. Assume that the existing beam is 5% utilised. As the lift point is a temporary load,
an allowable overstress of ⅓ can be adopted. Cl 3.1.2

Take Fy = 355 N/mm2

Wh = (W + Wa) x D.A.F + Ra = (1000+50)x1.25 + 60 = 1372.5 kg


= 13.5 kN

CHECK MAJOR AXIS SHEAR

Wh x a 13.5x3.5
Vmax = = = 10.5 kN
L
4.5

Ωv = 1.5 Cv = 1.0 Aw = d∙t = 310.4 x 7.9 = 2452.2 mm2 τ= 4.3 N/mm²


AISC 360-10

0.6Fy∙Aw∙Cv 0.6x355x2452.16x1 Cl G2.1


Vn = = = 348.21 kN ≥ Vmax = 10.5 kN Therefore OK
Ωv 1.5 UR = 0.03

CHECK MAJOR AXIS BENDING

Wh x a x b 13.5x3.5x1
Mmax = = = 10.5 kNm
L
4.5

NOTE:- SEE LTB CHECK REDUCED MOMENT CAPACITY DUE TO LTB = 126.2 kNm

Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 355 N/mm2 Zx = 846000 mm3

Fy∙Zx 355 x 846000 Cl F2.1


Mn = = = 179.84 kNm
Ωb 1.67

UR = 0.08
126.2 kNm ≥ Mmax = 10.5 kNm Therefore OK
Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 8 of

Reference

CHECK FLANGE LOCAL BENDING

g-t 166.9 - 7.9


l = -r = - 8.9 = 71 mm
2 2

l 71
s = + w/2 = + 70/2 = 106 mm

min(s ; b)
tan45 tan45

106
[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (106+106) x 13.7²
Zf = = = 9948 mm3

70
4 4

min(s ; a)
NOTE:-

106
Assume 30% of Load is taken through web due to clamp friction
and remaining 70% is through contact with toe of the flange.

0.7 x Wh 0.7x13.5
Mf = xl = x 71 = 0.3 kNm
2 2

71
Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 355 N/mm2

Fy∙Zf 355 x 9948 Cl F11.1


Mn = = = 2.1 kNm ≥ Mf = 0.3 kNm Therefore OK
Ωb 1.67 UR = 0.14

CHECK COMBINED BENDING STRESSES

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

Mmax = 10.5 kNm Sx = 754000 mm3 Ωb = 1.67

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (106+106) x 13.7²


Mf = 0.3 kNm Sf = = = 6632 mm3
6 6

Mmax 0.05·Fy 10.5x10⁶ 0.05 x 355 CONSIDERING BEAM


fb = + = + = 24.6 N/mm2 IS 5% UTILISED
Sx Ω 754000 1.67

Mf 0.3x10⁶
fbf = = = 45.2 N/mm2
Sf 6632

fbc = (fbf2 + fbf∙fb + fb2 + 3τ²)0.5 = (45.2² + 45.2x24.6 + 24.6² + 3x4.3²)⁰˙⁵ = 61.8 N/mm
2

Fb = 0.9Fy = 0.9 x 355 = 337 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 61.8 N/mm2 Therefore OK UR = 0.18
Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 9 of

Reference
CHECK LOAD CONDITION 2

Load Condition 2 occurs when the load is halfway between two lift points, so the applied load has a
vertical component and also one or two horizontal components, depending on the direction of cross-haul.
Assume that the existing beam is 5% utilised. As the lift point is a temporary load, an allowable overstress API RP 2A-WSD
of ⅓ can be adopted.
Cl 3.1.2

82°
2. 8
9
1.445

10

2.5
1000kg

Take Fy = 355 N/mm2


Shell ERD EM/039

Cl 2.1

Wh = (W + Wa) x D.A.F + Ra
= (1000+50)x1.25 + 60
= 1372.5 kg = 13.5 kN

Fl
Ft

L3 = (L12 + L22)0.5 = (2.5² + 1.445²)⁰˙⁵ = 2.89 m


Fv

α = tan-1(L2/L1) = tan¯¹(1.445/2.5) = 30 °

β = tan-1(h/(L3/2)) = tan¯¹(10/1.445) = 82 °

Wh/2 13.5/2
F = = = 6.8 kN (Force in Sling)
sin β sin 82

Fv = Wh/2 = 13.5/2 = 6.8 kN

Ft = F cos β cos α = 6.8 cos82 cos30 = 0.8 kN

Fl = F cos β sin α = 6.8 cos82 sin30 = 0.5 kN


Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 10 of

Reference

CHECK MAJOR AXIS SHEAR

Fv x a 6.8x3.5
Vmax = = = 5.3 kN
L
4.5
AISC 360-10
Ωv = 1.5 Cv = 1.0 Aw = d∙t = 310.4 x 7.9 = 2452.2 mm 2
Cl G2.1

τ= 2.2 N/mm²
0.6Fy∙Aw∙Cv 0.6x355x2452.16x1
Vn = = = 348.2 kN ≥ Vmax = 5.3 kN Therefore OK
Ωv 1.5 UR = 0.02

CHECK MAJOR AXIS BENDING

Fv x a x b 6.8x3.5x1
Mmax = = = 5.3 kNm
L 4.5

NOTE:- SEE LTB CHECK REDUCED MOMENT CAPACITY DUE TO LTB = 126.2 kNm

Ωb = 1.67 Fy = 355 N/mm2 Zx = 846000 mm3

Fy∙Zx 355 x 846000 Cl F2.1


Mn = = = 179.84 kNm
Ωb 1.67

UR = 0.04
126.2 kNm ≥ Mmax = 5.3 kNm Therefore OK

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 1

Check combined effects of Fv, Fl and Ft at location 1. Assume Fl is resisted by bottom flange only.

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic
section properties.

NOTE:- SEE LTB CHECK REDUCED MOMENT CAPACITY DUE TO LTB = 126.2 kNm

g-t 166.9 - 7.9


l = -r = - 8.9 = 71 mm
2 2

l 71
s = + w/2 = + 70/2 = 106 mm
tan45 tan45

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]T2 (106+106) x 13.7²


Sf = = = 6632 mm3
6 6

Af = B∙T = 166.9x13.7 = 2287 mm2


Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 11 of

Reference
Mmax = 5.3 kNm Sx = 754000 mm3
Ωb = 1.67

Ft∙e 0.8 x 128


Fc = = = 0.6 kN
g 166.9

Assume 30% of Load is taken through web due to clamp friction and
NOTE:- remaining 70% is through contact with toe of the flange.

Mf = (Fc + 0.7Fv/2) x l = (0.6 + 0.7x6.8/2) x 71 = 0.2 kNm

min(s ; b)
106
Mmax 0.05·Fy 5.3x10⁶ 0.05 x 355 CONSIDERING BEAM
fb = + = + = 17.7 N/mm² IS 5% UTILISED
Sx Ω 754000 1.67

70

min(s ; a)
Mf 0.2x10⁶

106
fbf = = = 30.2 N/mm2
Sf 6632

Fv 0.5x10³
fa = = = 0.2 N/mm2
Af 2287

71
fbc = (f + fbf∙(fb + fa)+ (fb + fa) + 3τ²)
bf
2 2 0.5

= (30.2² + 30.2x(17.7 + 0.2) + (17.7 + 0.2)² + 3x2.2²)⁰˙⁵


= 42 N/mm2

Fb = 0.9Fy = 0.9 x 355 = 337 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 42 N/mm2 Therefore OK UR = 0.12

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 3

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic section
properties.

NOTE:- SEE LTB CHECK REDUCED MOMENT CAPACITY DUE TO LTB = 126.2 kNm
Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 12 of

Reference

115

5
11

70
80

g-t 166.9 - 7.9


l = = = 80 mm
2 2

l 80
s = + w/2 = + 70/2 = 115 mm
tan45 tan45

d 265.2
y = = = 133 mm
2 2

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]t2 (115 + 115) x 7.9²


Zweb = = = 2392 mm3
6 6

Mmax = 5.3 kNm Ix = 116960000 mm4 Ωb = 1.67

Mweb = Ft∙(e+T+r) = 0.8x(128x13.7x8.9)x10¯³ = 0.1 kNm

Mmax∙y 0.05·Fy 5.3 x10⁶ x 133 0.05 x 355 CONSIDERING BEAM


fb = + = + = 16.7 N/mm2 IS 5% UTILISED
Ix Ω 116960000 1.67

Mweb 0.1 x10⁶


fb,web = = = 41.8 N/mm2
Zweb 2392
Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 13 of

Reference
fbc = (fb,web + fb,web∙fb + f + 3τ²)
2
b
2 0.5

= (41.8² + (41.8x16.7) + 16.7² + 3x2.2²)⁰˙⁵


= 52 N/mm2

Fb = 0.9Fy = 0.9 x 355 = 337 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 52 N/mm2 Therefore OK UR = 0.15

CHECK STRESS AT LOCATION 4

NOTE:- The principle of superposition is only applicable to elastic anlysis, hence check using elastic section
properties.

NOTE:- SEE LTB CHECK REDUCED MOMENT CAPACITY DUE TO LTB = 126.2 kNm

y = 133 mm Ix = 116960000 mm4

Mmax = 5.3 kNm Ωb = 1.67

Mweb = Ft∙(e + T + r + d) = 0.8 x (128 + 13.7 + 8.9 + 265.2) x10¯³ = 0.3 kNm

9
38

9
38
!
UE
VAL
#
4
:50
Err

70

35
4
Proposal/
Contract No.: REV No.: R A
NEC62B
Sep-23
Date
AC
Client: SHELL CALCULATION By

Location: NELSON Check

Subject: CAISSON C12 REPAIR Appr.


Sheet: 14 of

Reference

g-t 166.9 - 7.9


l = +r+d = + 8.9 + 265.2 = 354 mm
2 2

l 354
s = + w/2 = + 70/2 = 389 mm
tan45 tan45

[min(s ; a) + min(s ; b)]t2 (389 + 389) x 7.9²


Zweb = = = 8092 mm3
6 6

Mmax∙y 0.05·Fy 5.3 x10⁶ x 133 0.05 x 355 CONSIDERING BEAM


fb = + = + = 16.7 N/mm2 IS 5% UTILISED
Ix Ω 116960000 1.67

Mweb 0.3 x10⁶


fb,web = = = 37.1 N/mm2
Zweb 8092

fbc = (fb,web2 + fb,web∙fb + fb2 + 3τ²)0.5


= (37.1² + (37.1x16.7) + 16.7² + 3x2.2²)⁰˙⁵
= 48 N/mm2

Fb = 0.9Fy = 0.9 x 355 = 337 N/mm2 ≥ fbc = 48 N/mm2 Therefore OK UR = 0.14

CONCLUSION

Max UR = 0.18 < 1.0 ∴ OK. This assumes beam is already 5% utilised.

Beam passes all checks and is therefore suitable to be used for the required lifting point

You might also like