Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ACTION CODES:
( R ): Responsible – to approve ( A ): Accountable – to consolidate
( C ): Consulted – to review ( I ): Information
NOTES:
Review/Approval from Company does not constitute acceptance of design details, calculations, test methods or materials
developed or selected by Supplier/Contractor nor does relieve Supplier/Contractor from full compliance with contractual or other
DOCUMENT REVIEW STATUS SIGNATURE
(RESPONSIBLE PERSON):
1 Not Approved. Revise and Re-Issue Incorporating Comments
1 Returned without Comments 1 Approved with Comments
1 Returned with Comments 1 Approved without Comments
Next Issue as follows: DATE:
PLEASE RETURN THE DOCUMENT TO RESPONSIBLE PERSON BY : Indra Destyono AT THE ENERGY BUILDING 6-Feb-23
DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL PT SYNERGY ENGINEERING
Nusa Loka Blok C1/03 Sektor XIV-4
BSDCITY, Tangerang 15322
Tel: +62 21 5315 0464 - 5
Fax: +62 21 5315 0466
Dear Sir,
Please acknowledge receipt by signing this transmittal and report shortage (if any) to our document control department.
BLA-02-02-SYN-ARS-M-LI-00-002 Equipment List for Relocation (Option 2) A Issued for Review PDF
SUBMITTED BY RECEIVED BY
Signature
FPRJ – 18 The controlled version of this Document resides online in Synergy Business Suite. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED Rev.0;02062014
MEDCO E&P MALAKA
LOCATION : Block - A
Attachment No. :
Attachment No. of Pages :
Rev. A Page 2 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
RECORD OF REVISION
The revisions listed below have been incorporated in this copy of the document
Rev. A Page 3 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Contents
1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 4
2 OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................................................................... 6
3 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ 6
3.1 DEFINITIONS.......................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................... 6
4 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 6
4.1 PROJECT DOCUMENTS ....................................................................................................... 6
4.2 COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................................... 6
4.3 INTERNATIONAL CODES, STANDARDS, AND PUBLICATIONS ........................................ 7
4.4 LOCAL REGULATIONS .......................................................................................................... 9
5 COMPRESSOR TYPE GENERAL SELECTION ............................................................................. 9
5.1 TYPE OF COMPRESSOR ...................................................................................................... 9
5.2 COMPRESSOR SELECTION CHART ................................................................................. 13
5.3 COMPRESSOR OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................... 14
6 BOOSTER COMPRESSOR TYPE SELECTION STUDY ..............................................................14
6.1 BOOSTER COMPRESSOR PROCESS OPERATING CONDITION ................................... 14
6.2 COMPRESSOR TYPE SELECTION .................................................................................... 16
6.3 COMPRESSOR ARRANGEMENT OPTIONS ...................................................................... 17
6.4 COMPRESSOR ARRANGEMENT SELECTION.................................................................. 18
7 COMPRESSOR DRIVER SELECTION STUDY ............................................................................27
7.1 COMPRESSOR DRIVER TYPE ........................................................................................... 27
7.2 COMPRESSOR DRIVER OPTIONS .................................................................................... 30
7.3 COMPRESSOR DRIVER SELECTION ................................................................................ 30
8 SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................35
Rev. A Page 4 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Block-A gas reserves is developed for sales gas supply to Pertagas Niaga. Block A field development
consists of Alur Siwah (AS), Alur Rambong (AR), and Julu Rayeu (JR) fields. Alur Siwah Central
Processing Plant (AS CPP) is built to monetize gas from AS and AR fields. JR gas is used for fuel gas
supply to AS CPP and produced water from all fields is injected to water injection wells in JR.
In Block A Development Phase I, facilities are designed to produce sales gas in the amount of 63.25
BBTUD with associated condensate, produced water, and sulfur product. Gas processing at AS CPP
consist of Well fluid Separation System, Acid Gas Removal Unit, Dew Point Control Unit, Acid Gas
Enrichment & Sulfur Recovery Unit, Sulfur Granulation Unit, Condensate Stabilization & Produced
Water Degassing Unit and the produced Liquid Storage & Pumping Facility. Two water injection wells
are provided to accommodate produced water rate.
In Block A Development Phase II, additional production wells are going to be drilled to maintain sales
gas supply to buyer of 48.6 BBTUD (TOP).
Near the end of plateau production period (end of 2025), feed gas from AS & AR wells will begin
operating in lower pressure regime due to declining reservoir pressure. Block A Development Phase III
project will be performed to accommodate expansion due to low pressure operation and maintain
sales gas of 48.6 BBTUD (TOP). The peak gas production to AS CPP in low pressure regime is
expected at 70-77 MMSCFD.
This study is being developed to evaluate the existing facilities capacity from wellhead to AS CPP and
water injection well, conduct plant optimization and identify the additional facilities required in low
pressure operation.
Rev. A Page 5 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Figure 3. Block A Gas Development Phase III: AS CPP – Existing & Additional Facilities
for LP Phase
Block A Gas Development Phase III- PreFEED Document No. : BLA-02-02-SYN-ARS-M-SY-00-002
Date : 27/01/2023
Rev. : A
Block A Gas Development Doc. No. : BLA-02-02-SYN-
Phase III - PreFEED ARS-M-SY-00-002
Rev. A Page 6 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
2 OBJECTIVE
The purpose of the publication of this document is to cover compressor selection study of the new
Booster Compressor Packages (38-ZZZ-101) suitable for installation in existing CPP on Alur Siwah
(AS) site operation of MEDCO E&P MALAKA for Block-A Gas Development Phase III- PreFEED
Project.
3.2 ABBREVIATIONS
ACFM Actual Cubic Feet per Minute(s)
AR Alur Rambong
AS Alur Siwah
BBTUD Billion British Thermal Unit per Day
CAPEX Capital Expenditures
GPSA The Natural Gas Processor Suppliers Association
JR Julu Rayeu
MMscfd Million Metric Standard Cubic Feet per Day
OPEX Operating Expenditures
VFD Variable Frequency Drive
VSD Variable Speed Drive
4 REFERENCES
The requirements contained in the latest editions of the following publications shall be a part of this
specification. Where two or more references define requirements for the same subject, the most
restrictive reference shall govern.
Rev. A Page 7 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Rev. A Page 8 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Auxiliaries
API STD 616 Gas Turbines for Petroleum, Chemical, and Gas Industry
Services
API STD 617 Axial and Centrifugal Compressors and Expander-
compressors
API STD 661 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers for General Refinery Service
API STD 670 Machinery Protection Systems
API STD 671 Special Purpose Couplings for Petroleum, Chemical and
Gas Industry Services
API STD 942 Controlling Weld Hardness of Carbon Steel Refinery
Equipment to Prevent Environmental Cracking
ASME B16.5 Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings
ASME B31.3 Process Piping
ASME PTC 10 Performance Testing of Centrifugal Compressors
ASME PTC 22 Performance Test Code on Gas Turbines
ASME Section IX Welding and Brazing Qualification
ASME Section V Nondestructive Examination
ASME Section VIII Div. 1 Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
AWS D1 .1 Structural Welding Codes
BS 5444 Physical attributes of documents for microfilming or
scanning
EEMUA no. 140 Noise Procedure Specification
GPSA Gas Processors Suppliers Association (GPSA)
Engineering Data Book 13th Ed.
IEC 60027 Letter Symbols to be used in Electrical Technology
IEC 60034 Rotating Electrical Machines
IEC 60072 Dimension and Output Series for Rotating Electrical
Machines
IEC 60079 Electrical Apparatus for Explosive Gas Atmospheres
IEC 60204 Safety of Machinery - Electrical Equipment of Machines
IEC 60529 Degrees of Protection Provided by Enclosures (IP Code)
IEC 61779 Electrical Apparatus for the detection and measurement of
flammable gases
IEEE 112A Test Procedure for Poly-phase Induction Motors and
Generators
IEEE 80 Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding
ISA Instrument Society of America
ISO 10474 / EN 10204 Steel and steel products — Inspection documents
ISO 1940-2 Mechanical Vibration - Balance Quality Requirements of
Rigid Rotors - Part 2: Balance Errors
ISO 9001 Quality Management System
NEMA SM 23 Steam Turbines for Mechanical Drive Service
NFPA 12 Standard on Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems
Rev. A Page 9 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
There are many types of compressors, thus a proper selection is needed to fulfill the typical
necessity of each industry. Generally, the compression of gases may be accomplished in device
with rotating blades or in cylinders with reciprocating pistons. Rotary equipment is used for high
volume flow where the discharge pressure is not too high, while the reciprocating compressors are
required for high pressures. Besides volumetric flow rate, there are also many parameters to be
considered, includes the valid standards to be used.
The inlet and outlet pressure level is varying, from a deep vacuum to a high positive pressure,
depending on process’ necessity. This inlet and outlet pressure is related, corresponding with the
type of compressor and its configuration. As shown in Figure 5-1, compressors are generally
classified into two separate and distinct categories: Dynamic and Positive Displacement.
Rev. A Page 10 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
add velocity and pressure to fluid. Dynamic compressor types are divided into Centrifugal
compressor and Axial Flow compressor.
A. Centrifugal Compressor
Centrifugal compressor is specified according to API 617. The centrifugal compressor
is a dynamic machine that achieves compression by applying inertial forces to the gas
(acceleration, deceleration, and turning) by means of rotating impellers. It is made up
of one or more stages; each stage consists of an impeller as the rotating element and
the stationary element, i.e. diffuser. There are two types of diffuser: vane less
diffusers and vane diffusers.
Vane less diffuser is widely used in wide operating range applications, while the vane
less diffuser is used in applications where a high pressure ratio or high efficiency is
required. The main components of a centrifugal compressor are shown below.
In centrifugal compressor, the fluid flow enters the impeller in an axial direction and
discharged from an impeller radially perpendicular to the axis of rotation. The gas fluid
is forced through the impeller by rapidly rotating impeller blades. The gas next flows
through a circular chamber (diffuser), following a spiral path where it loses velocity
and increases pressure.
The deceleration of flow or “diffuser action” causes pressure build-up in the centrifugal
compressor. Briefly, the impeller adds energy to the gas fluid, and then the diffuser
converts it into pressure energy.
The maximum pressure rise for centrifugal compressor mostly depends on the
rotational speed (RPM) of the impeller and the impeller diameter. But the maximum
permissible speed is limited by the strength of the structural materials of the blade
and the sonic velocity of fluid; furthermore, it leads into limitation for the maximum
achievable pressure rise.
Hence, multistage centrifugal compressors are used for higher pressure lift
applications. A multistage centrifugal compressor compresses gas to the required
pressure in multiple stages.
Typical centrifugal compressors for the single-stage design can intake gas volumes
between 100 to 150,000 inlets ACFM. A multi-stage centrifugal compressor is normal
considered for inlet volume between 500 to 200,000 inlets ACFM.
B. Axial Compressor
Axial compressor is specified according to API 617. Axial compressors can handle
large volume flows and are more efficient than centrifugal compressors. However,
centrifugal compressors have wider operating ranges and are less vulnerable to
Rev. A Page 11 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
surge and less susceptible to fouling. Furthermore, Axial Compressors are generally
used for lower pressure ratio applications
Axial compressors should be considered only for high flow applications in duties such
as compressing air with an adequate suction filtration system to prevent airborne
contaminant fouling/deposits or clean, non-corrosive gases.
A. Rotary Compressor
Screw compressor is specified according to API 619. A screw compressor is a twin-
shaft rotary piston machine functioning on the principle of positive displacement
combined with internal compression.
The medium handled is conveyed from the suction port to the discharge port,
entrapped in steadily diminishing spaces between the convolutions of the two helical
rotors, being compressed up to the final internal pressure before it is released into the
discharge nozzle.
Rev. A Page 12 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
The spaces referred to are those formed between the cylinder walls and the
interlocking convolutions of the two helical rotors. The position of the edge of the
outlet port determines the so-called “built-in volumetric ratio”.
The compression that can occur in the discharge header is isochoric: more gas is
being pushed into a fixed volume. Since a screw compressor operates on a positive
displacement principle, it will continue to move the same volume of gas per rotation
regardless of gas density and downstream pressure.
The screw compressor rotor is stiff and has a low moment of inertia. Precision
balancing is not as critical and the operating range will normally be below the first
torsional critical speed. Screw compressor pressure limits are normally dictated by
temperature, due to the heat of compression; however, rotor deflection and bearing
life are also key factors in pressure limits.
A. Reciprocating Compressor
Reciprocating compressor is specified according to API 618, API 11P or ISO 13631.
The reciprocating, or piston compressor, is a positive displacement compressor that
uses the movement of a piston within a cylinder to move gas from one pressure level
to another higher pressure level. Reciprocating compressors might be considered as
single acting, when the compressing is accomplished using only one side of the
piston, or double acting when it is using both sides of the piston.
They are used mainly when high-pressure head is required at a low flow. Generally,
the maximum allowable discharge-gas temperature determines the maximum
compression ratio. Reciprocating compressors are furnished in either single-stage or
multistage types. For single stage design, the entire compression is accomplished
with a single cylinder or a group of cylinders in parallel.
Rev. A Page 13 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Rev. A Page 14 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Rev. A Page 15 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Case 1 - Case 2 -
Case 3 - Case 4 - Case 5 -
Early Life Early Life
Late Life Late Life Turndown
(AS Field) (AR+AS Fields)
No Description Unit (AS Field) (AR+AS Fields) (Note 2)
(Note 1) (Note 1)
LP IP LP IP LP IP LP IP
LP IP
Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage
Compressibil
9 - 0.9451 - 0.9433 0.9825 0.9487 0.9821 0.9475 0.9826 0.948
ity Factor (Z)
Molecular
10 - 24.71 - 24.68 24.88 24.9 24.89 24.91 25 25.02
Weight
Gas Composition
1 H2S (Note 3) % Mol - 0.4874 - 0.455 0.4933 0.4946 0.4616 0.4628 0.5038 0.5055
2 CO2 (Note 3) % Mol - 25.0088 - 24.1869 24.8974 24.9652 24.0597 24.1217 24.9366 25.0241
3 Nitrogen % Mol - 1.9595 - 1.8513 1.9372 1.9425 1.8236 1.8284 1.9212 1.928
4 Methane % Mol - 67.1017 - 67.1549 66.46 66.642 66.4181 66.5901 66.1288 66.3621
5 Ethane % Mol - 2.9149 - 3.4504 2.9147 2.9227 3.466 3.475 2.9418 2.9522
6 Propane % Mol - 0.8758 - 1.1364 0.8952 0.8977 1.1725 1.1756 0.9278 0.931
7 i-Butane % Mol - 0.3118 - 0.3511 0.3296 0.3305 0.3755 0.3764 0.352 0.3533
8 n-Butane % Mol - 0.304 - 0.369 0.3284 0.3293 0.4048 0.4058 0.3564 0.3577
9 i-Pentane % Mol - 0.1992 - 0.2171 0.2322 0.2328 0.2594 0.2601 0.261 0.262
10 n-Pentane % Mol - 0.1041 - 0.1153 0.1254 0.1257 0.1432 0.1435 0.1425 0.1431
11 n-Hexane % Mol - 0.1392 - 0.1401 0.1923 0.1928 0.2029 0.2034 0.2209 0.2217
12 n-Heptane % Mol - 0.1078 - 0.1101 0.1701 0.1706 0.184 0.1845 0.1923 0.1929
13 n-Octane % Mol - 0.0488 - 0.0511 0.0822 0.0824 0.0986 0.0988 0.0908 0.0911
14 n-Nonane % Mol - 0.016 - 0.0172 0.0271 0.0272 0.0312 0.313 0.0294 0.0295
15 n-Decane % Mol - 0.0074 - 0.0072 0.0121 0.0121 0.0125 0.0125 0.013 0.0131
16 n-C11 % Mol - 0 - 0.0031 0.0053 0.0053 0.005 0.005 0.0058 0.0058
17 n-C12 % Mol - 0 - 0.0013 0.0022 0.0022 0.002 0.002 0.0024 0.0024
18 n-C13 % Mol - 0 - 0.0005 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0009 0.0009
19 n-C14 % Mol - 0 - 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003
20 n-C15 % Mol - 0 - 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
21 H2O % Mol - 0.4075 - 0.3779 0.8942 0.6232 0.8783 0.622 0.9722 0.6233
Total % Mol - 100 - 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Note:
1. During early life production (case 1 and 2), gas will be directly entering the compressor IP
stage, and LP Stage will be not applicable. The compressor number of stages will be
further verified during next engineering stages after receive confirmation from VENDOR.
2. In order to deliver the reduced flow at Turndown case, the following options of compressor
arrangements may need to be proposed by VENDOR:
i. 1 x 100% (recycle mode for turndown case)
ii. 1 x 100 % (restaging for turndown case)
iii. 2 x 50% (recycle mode for turndown case)
iv. 2 x 50 % (reconfiguration for turndown case, i.e. comp. will run 1 x 50% during
turndown case)
3. The Feed gas contains of 27.5% CO2 and 1.2% H2S as per SOW and gas AS incoming
lab test result)
Rev. A Page 16 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
2755 ACFM
Case 5 (LP)
7703 ACFM
Case 3 (LP)
8196 ACFM
Case 4 (LP)
923
Figure 6-1 Booster Compressor Operating Point vs. Compressor Selection Chart
th
(Basic Chart is refer to GPSA Engineering Data Book, 12 edition, 2004)
The Compressor Selection chart is based on a typical normal range of operation for compressors.
A cross point between compressor discharge pressure and compressor inlet flow must be fall upon
the compressor operating range shows on the chart.
Based on the Figure 6-1 above, the applicability of various Compressors type for each operating
cases are specified in table 6-2 below.
Rev. A Page 17 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Table 6-2 Various Compressor Type against Booster Compressor Operating Cases
Case 2 - Case 4 -
Case 1 - Case 3 - Case 5 -
Early Life Late Life
Early Life Late Life Turndown
(AR+AS (AR+AS
No Description (AS Field) (AS Field)
Fields) Fields)
LP IP LP IP LP IP LP IP LP IP
Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage Stage
Operating Condition
1 Gas Flow Rate Actual ACFM - 2228 - 2350 7703 2239 8196 2384 2755 796
2 Disch. Pressure Psig - 923 - 923 300 923 300 923 300 923
Compressor Type
1 Centrifugal Multi-stages - √ - √ √ √ √ √ √ √
2 Reciprocating Multi-stages - √ - √ x √ x √ x √
3 Centrifugal Single-stages - √ - x x x x x x x
4 Rotary - x - x x x x x x x
5 Axial - x - x x x x x x x
Legend:
√ : Gas Flow rate actual and Discharge Pressure is located inside recommended
Compressor operating region as per Figure 5-6.
x : Gas Flow rate actual and Discharge Pressure is located outside recommended
Compressor operating region as per Figure 5-6.
With refer to plotted charts on Figure 6-1 and Table 6-2, it shows that “Centrifugal Multi-stages
Compressor” is the most suitable type to be used on this Project, because it able to accommodate
all of Booster Compressor operating points (Case 1-IP, 2-IP, 3-LP, 3-IP, 4-LP, 4-IP, 5-LP, and
Case 5-IP).
The configuration for each of the above options is shown on Table 6-3 below.
Compressor Arrangement
No Description
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
1 Compressor arrangements 1 x 100% 1 x 100% 2 x 50% 2 x 50%
2 Compressor train quantity 1 1 2 2
Recycle Mode Re-staging Recycle Mode Re-configuration
Compressor
Compressor will will need to Compressor will Compressor will
entering the modify before entering the be running in 1 x
3 Scenario for Turndown
recycle mode it able to recycle mode 50% during
during turndown operate on during turndown Turndown case
case (late life) turndown case (late life) (late life)
case (late life)
Rev. A Page 18 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
1. The Criteria and Percentage Weights are specified as per Table 6-4 below, which based
on Appendix 1 of Doc. No. INT-002-PRG-PDEE MEDC-V-2022, “Procedure for Concept
Development and Concept Selection”
Score
5 Highly Recommended
4 More Recommended
3 Recommended
2 Less Recommended
1 Low Recommendation
Rev. A Page 19 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Compressor Arrangement
Rev. A Page 20 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Compressor Arrangement
Rev. A Page 21 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Compressor Arrangement
Rev. A Page 22 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Compressor Arrangement
Rev. A Page 23 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Compressor Arrangement
Rev. A Page 24 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Compressor Arrangement
Rev. A Page 25 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Compressor Arrangement
Rev. A Page 26 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Compressor Arrangement
Legend:
W = Weight Factor
S = Score
With refer to the comparison of the total score for each of the available compressor arrangement options as per Table 6-5 above, the 1 x 100%
compressor arrangement with recycle mode, is selected to be used on this Project as a base case for compressor arrangement.
.
Rev. A Page 27 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
One of the main advantages of steam turbines is their stability of power output which is not
affected by the daily and/ or seasonal fluctuations in ambient temperatures. In addition, steam
turbines are very reliable and highly available. Steam turbines are simple in design and
technologically proven. Steam turbines offer flexibility in operation due to capability of running
at a wide range of speed. The starting torque requirements for a shaft lines could be easily
catered by steam turbine drivers.
However, the main disadvantage in steam turbine drivers is the requirement of an extended
layout in the plant. This mandates an extended steam generation and condensate recovery
systems. Steam turbine auxiliaries impose heavier weight and consume a lot of space and a
distributed footprint.
Advantages Disadvantages
1) Stable power output (not affected by 1) Require steam source / steam
ambient temperatures) generation system, which is not
2) Require no Fuel Gas, so it will have free common on offshore oil and gas plant
emissions 2) Require additional condensate
3) Require no electricity recovery system
3) Require large footprint
Rev. A Page 28 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
In general, Heavy-Duty gas turbines are single shaft machines, with some exceptions
where a dual shaft machine is applied on recent machinery. Such dual-shaft Heavy-
Duty gas turbines combine both high power capacity as a mechanical drive and
robustness, but without the need for a big starter motor and the need for extra
investment in oversizing the electric power station and additional power distribution and
control.
In a single shaft machine, the gas turbine the starting torque might not be sufficient to
start the shaft line from zero speed, and accordingly a starter motor or steam turbine is
added in the shaft line to assist the gas turbine start from a standstill condition. Heavy-
Duty gas turbines operate at near-fixed speed (97% to 103% of rated speed).
Waste Heat Recovery units (WHRU) or Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) are
often associated with gas turbines to recover some heat power and thus improve the
plant efficiency.
Advantages Disadvantages
1) Require relatively less footprint 1) Relatively medium/low thermal efficiency
2) Less lube oil consumption (up to 38%), and may require additional
3) Less maintenance cost because Waste Heat Recovery Unit to improve its
of less complexity of components efficiency
due to less contacting 2) Require Fuel Gas source which produces
part/components relatively high emissions
3) Require additional starter motor
4) Require additional dry gas seal systems,
including its utility.
5) Higher CAPEX
Rev. A Page 29 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
The advantages of these new gas turbines are the thermal efficiency (up to 43%), wider
range of speed variation, and the limited downtime for maintenance (concept of the
swap engine). They allow a start up in any conditions (from scratch or at settling out
pressure) without the need for a starter motor. However, aero-derivative gas turbines
are more sensitive to variations in combustion air temperature than the Heavy-Duty gas
turbines and may require more frequent inspection and overhauls.
Aero-derivative gas turbines are composed of multiple shafts; with or without a free
power turbine. By limiting the length of the shaft line, the footprint is less and
consequently the installed CAPEX can be lower in high offshore or modularized plant.
Electric motor can be used to drive compressors, with power requirements up to 80 MW; they
are robust and reliable and don’t require any specific maintenance plans and reduce the
footprint requirements. However, a motor in DOL (Direct on Line) arrangement will require 6
to 7 times the rated power to start from standstill condition, a motor equipped with soft starter,
would require 1 to 2 times the rated power.
For small plants where the required power is limited and based on the assumption that the
grid or local network can deliver the power, a DOL motor can be used.
For large plant motor with soft starter, and by extension variable frequency drive (VFD)
system are selected. The VFD is selected to tune the compressor operating points and to
start the unit with low inrush current.
The main advantages of electric motors over the Heavy-Duty gas turbines are the increased
plant availability (estimated at an average of one week per year) and emissions-free operation
at plant location.
Rev. A Page 30 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Advantages Disadvantages
1) Less maintenance, vibration, and footprint 1) Require electrical source / power
area generation system
2) Suitable for site which had a limitation in 2) Motor with VFD require relatively high
providing electrical power but had fuel gas CAPEX
sources 3) Motor will require explosion proof
3) Require no Fuel Gas, so it will have free certification for installation on
emissions hazardous area
The Steam Turbine is not considered on this report due to there are no steam sources available on
the site. The provision of steam generation on site will make the overall Project CAPEX increase
significantly.
The criteria and percentage weight for further compressor arrangement selection will refer to
Appendix-1 of Doc. No. INT-002-PRG-PDEE MEDC-V-2022, “Procedure for Concept Development
and Concept Selection”
1. The Criteria and Percentage Weights are specified as per Table 7-4 below, which based
on Appendix 1 of Doc. No. INT-002-PRG-PDEE MEDC-V-2022, “Procedure for Concept
Development and Concept Selection”
Rev. A Page 31 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Score
5 Highly Recommended
4 More Recommended
3 Recommended
2 Less Recommended
1 Low Recommendation
Further assessment on each of Compressor Arrangement options will be elaborate and compare
on the Table 7-5 below.
Rev. A Page 32 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Option 1 Option 2
Weight (Electric Motor with VFD) (Gas Turbine)
No. Criteria
(W) Score Score
Description WxS Description WxS
(S) (S)
1 Reliability & 10% x Mean Failure Rate = 17.44 times per 1 million hrs 4 0.4 x Mean Failure Rate = 499.17 times per 1 million hrs 2 0.2
Availability (OREDA 2015). (OREDA 2015).
x Lower Failure rate means higher reliability & x Higher Failure rate means lower reliability &
availability. availability.
2 Operability & 5% Operability and Flexibility is better than Gas Turbine, 5 0.25 Operability and Flexibility is lower than Gas Turbine, 3 0.15
Flexibility due to: due to:
x Can accommodate wide range of process & x Can accommodate wide range of process &
operating conditions. operating conditions; however fuel gas quality and
x Most electric motors are designed to run at 50% consumption shall meet turbine requirement.
to 100% of rated load, with full-load motor x Gas turbines have ability to run at 50% - 100% load,
efficiency is around 85–97%. with a thermal efficiency until up to 38%.
3 Maintainability 5% x Less maintenance than gas turbine 3 0.15 x More maintenance required than electric motor. 2 0.1
4 Facility 5% Electric Motor have moderate facility complexity, 4 0.2 Gas Turbine have moderate facility complexity, 3 0.15
Complexity because: because:
x In term of skid package, it is simpler than gas x In term of skid package, Gas Turbine is more
turbine, because it doesn’t require various complex than electric motor, because it requires
auxiliary systems such as Intake & Exhaust various auxiliary systems such as Intake & Exhaust
System, Fuel gas System, Burner & Combustor, System, Fuel gas System, Burner & Combustor, and
and Dry gas seal system. Dry gas seal system.
x Electric motor have smaller footprint skid x Gas turbine have larger footprint skid package.
package. x VFD is not required; this will reduce the facility
x VFD is required; this will increase the facility complexity.
complexity. (VFD panel and motor switchgear
requires extra space in the E/I room)
Rev. A Page 33 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Option 1 Option 2
Weight (Electric Motor with VFD) (Gas Turbine)
No. Criteria
(W) Score Score
Description WxS Description WxS
(S) (S)
5 Project Execution 20% Project Execution Complexity is moderate, because: 3 0.6 Project Execution Complexity is moderate, because: 3 0.6
Complexity x It doesn’t require various auxiliary systems such x It requires various auxiliary systems such as Intake
as Intake & Exhaust System, Fuel gas System, & Exhaust System, Fuel gas System, Burner &
Burner & Combustor, and Dry gas seal system. Combustor, and Dry gas seal system.
x VFD is required; this will increase the project x VFD is not required; this will reduce the project
execution complexity. (VFD panel and motor execution complexity.
switchgear requires more intense supervision
and review from multi-discipline)
6 Project and 5% Project and operational safety will require moderate 3 0.15 Project and operational safety will require more sources 3 0.15
Operational sources and supervision, because: and supervision, because:
Safety x Even-though there is VFD requirement, the x Even-though VFD is not required, Overall package
overall package is simpler (It doesn’t require is more complex (It requires various auxiliary
various auxiliary systems such as Intake & systems such as Intake & Exhaust System, Fuel gas
Exhaust System, Fuel gas System, Burner & System, Burner & Combustor, and Dry gas seal
Combustor, and Dry gas seal system. system.
7 Project Delivery 10% x Electric motor with VFD has approximated 12-14 3 0.3 x Gas turbine has approximate 12 months EXW 3 0.3
Schedule months EXW delivery time. delivery time.
8 Capital Cost 20% Capital cost will be moderate, because: 3 0.6 Capital cost will be moderate, because: 3 0.6
x An electric motor costs significantly less than a x A gas turbine costs significantly higher than an
gas turbine up front. But, a VFD will require extra electric motor up front. But, the overall initial cost
cost. So, the overall initial cost may slightly less may slightly higher than electric motor which
than gas turbine. equipped with VFD.
x Note: Electric motor require dedicated power x Note: Gas turbine do not require dedicated power
generation or integration with external electrical generation or integration with external electrical
source (i.e., PLN), but it will not require source (i.e., PLN), but it will require dedicated fuel
dedicated fuel gas sources and facilities. gas sources and facilities.
9 Operational Cost 10% x Electricity costs have relatively higher cost than 2 0.2 x Natural (Fuel) Gas costs have lower cost than 4 0.4
a natural (fuel) gas. electricity.
Block A Gas Development Phase III- PreFEED Document No. : BLA-02-02-SYN-ARS-M-SY-00-002
Date : 27/01/2023
Rev. : A
Doc. No. : BLA-02-02-SYN-
Block A Gas Development Phase III - PreFEED
ARS-M-SY-00-002
Rev. A Page 34 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
Option 1 Option 2
Weight (Electric Motor with VFD) (Gas Turbine)
No. Criteria
(W) Score Score
Description WxS Description WxS
(S) (S)
10 ASR 5% x Abandonment (long term preservation) and site 4 0.2 x Abandonment (long term preservation) and site 2 0.1
(Abandonment restoration will require fewer sources, due to the restoration will require more sources, due to the
and Site simplicity of the electric motor skid package. complexity of the gas turbine skid package and its
Restoration) auxiliary systems.
11 Environmental 5% x Less Noise and Free Emissions. 5 0.25 x Produce emissions and more noise. 2 0.1
Issue x May need additional emissions reducer equipment
to ensure its compliance with local regulations
criteria.
TOTAL 100% 38 3.3 30 2.85
Legend:
W = Weight Factor
S = Score
With refer to the comparison of the total score for each of the available compressor driver options as per Table 7-5 above, the Electric Motor with VFD,
is selected to be used on this Project as a base case for compressor driver.
Rev. A Page 35 of 35
Compressor Selection Study
Rev Date : 27/01/2023
8 SUMMARY
The preferred Compressor package scheme for this Project will be: