The document provides evaluations for two demo teachers, Teacher A and Teacher B, conducted on December 17, 2023. Teacher A received a grade of 93 and the evaluator noted positives such as demonstrating how to use zoom and good quality of voice. Areas for improvement included unclear questions and reading processing questions in the analysis phase. Teacher B received a grade of 95, with positives like asking relatable questions and awareness of students. The evaluator suggested being careful of words used and time management during the abstraction phase.
The document provides evaluations for two demo teachers, Teacher A and Teacher B, conducted on December 17, 2023. Teacher A received a grade of 93 and the evaluator noted positives such as demonstrating how to use zoom and good quality of voice. Areas for improvement included unclear questions and reading processing questions in the analysis phase. Teacher B received a grade of 95, with positives like asking relatable questions and awareness of students. The evaluator suggested being careful of words used and time management during the abstraction phase.
The document provides evaluations for two demo teachers, Teacher A and Teacher B, conducted on December 17, 2023. Teacher A received a grade of 93 and the evaluator noted positives such as demonstrating how to use zoom and good quality of voice. Areas for improvement included unclear questions and reading processing questions in the analysis phase. Teacher B received a grade of 95, with positives like asking relatable questions and awareness of students. The evaluator suggested being careful of words used and time management during the abstraction phase.
Name of Demo Teacher A: __Venice R. Soriano _ Date:_ December 17, 2023____
Name of Evaluator/s: _Hannah Villamor__ Grade given by evaluator: 93
CONTINUE AVOID
Demonstrates how to use zoom Dead air
Complete preliminaries Read subtitles on video since there is no audio
Good quality of voice Unclear questions
Utilizes chat reactions Lowers energy toward the end
Waits for other students Improve your way of giving instructions
The positive affirmations sound not genuine because of the tone of the voice Reads processing questions in the analysis phase Stuttering Not smooth transitions Time-management Nervousness is visible Stop present your screen when you do your processing questions Address students as ‘teacher’ Unnecessary fillers
Grade Level: _5_ Topic: _Mga Katangian ng Mabuting Tagasunod sa Pamayanan_
Phase of the Lesson: Motivational Activity Main Activity Analysis Closing Activity 2
Name of Demo Teacher B:__Ma. Fe L. Dimatatac___ Date:_December 17, 2023_
Name of Evaluator/s: _Hannah Villamor_ Grade given by evaluator: 95
CONTINUE AVOID
Asks relatable questions (sino sa inyo ang Low voice
sumusunod sa mga magulang nila) Slow phasing Aware of her students (you may lower your Call other students (Ivan and Lucas as favorite hands na) students) Good IMs- colorful and catchy, uses keywords Careful of the words and statements (pagtawid) or titles only Time-management since abstraction takes too Understandable discussion much of the time Positive affirmations Don’t forget to ask for clarifications or questions before proceeding to the next topic Utilizes chat reactions Answers questions gracefully and stands firm with her lesson. Mastery of content Teaches how to use the app
Grade Level:__5_ Topic: _Mga Katangian ng Mabuting Tagasunod sa Pamayanan_
Phase of the Lesson: Abstraction Application Assessment Assignment
Remembering The Kanji 1 (Kindle Fire Edition) : A Complete Course On How Not To Forget The Meaning and Writing of Japanese Characters - James W. Heisig