The document contains an evaluation of a teacher's online lesson on sexuality issues for 8th grade students. The evaluator gave the lesson a grade of 92 and noted several positive aspects, including the teacher providing trigger warnings, processing student answers during the application phase, having good energy, and affirming and acknowledging student responses. However, the evaluator also provided some feedback on areas for improvement, such as flashing the learning objectives later than ideal, misplacing the review part of the lesson, and using filler words and a less formal language at times.
The document contains an evaluation of a teacher's online lesson on sexuality issues for 8th grade students. The evaluator gave the lesson a grade of 92 and noted several positive aspects, including the teacher providing trigger warnings, processing student answers during the application phase, having good energy, and affirming and acknowledging student responses. However, the evaluator also provided some feedback on areas for improvement, such as flashing the learning objectives later than ideal, misplacing the review part of the lesson, and using filler words and a less formal language at times.
The document contains an evaluation of a teacher's online lesson on sexuality issues for 8th grade students. The evaluator gave the lesson a grade of 92 and noted several positive aspects, including the teacher providing trigger warnings, processing student answers during the application phase, having good energy, and affirming and acknowledging student responses. However, the evaluator also provided some feedback on areas for improvement, such as flashing the learning objectives later than ideal, misplacing the review part of the lesson, and using filler words and a less formal language at times.
Name of Demo Teacher B: Arabella Mollena Date: January 25, 2023
Name of Evaluator/s: Johannes Paulo Dela Rosa Grade given by evaluator: 92 Grade Level: 8 Topic: Napapanahong isyu sa sekswalidad Phase of the Lesson: Abstraction Application Assessment
CONTINUE AVOID
Provided trigger warnings Learning objectives were flashed too late
The teacher should be careful of the statements The review part is misplaced. It should be in the she tells to the students preliminaries instead of putting it in the abstraction. Processed students' answers in application IM in the abstraction phase could be improved. Good energy Instructions should be flashed in the screen Affirms student's responses Avoid using fillers such as “ayan” and “so” Acknowledges responses in the chat box Redundant code switching Tries to call students who haven’t participated yet Use a more formal language. Do not address learners as "guys" No seamless transition to Abstraction