Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Elsevier
1600 John F. Kennedy Blvd.
Ste. 1800
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2899
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the
Publisher’s permissions policies, and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance
Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher
(other than as may be noted herein).
Chapter 166, Pathophysiology of Retinopathy of Prematurity: The contributor retains copyrights to contribu-
tor’s original figures/images.
Notice
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating
and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. Because of rapid
advances in the medical sciences in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages
should be made. To the fullest extent of the law, no responsibility is assumed by Elsevier, authors, editors,
or contributors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
Previous editions copyrighted 2017 by Elsevier, Inc, and 2011, 2004, 1998, 1992 by Saunders, an imprint of
Elsevier, Inc.
Printed in Canada
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DEDICATED TO
Our spouses –
Helene Polin, Carolyn Abman, Risa Sorkin, and Andrea Benitz
Our children –
Allison Polin Steinbrenner, Mitchell Polin, Jessica Moseley, and Gregory Polin
Ryan Abman, Lauren Abman, Mark Abman, and Megan Abman
Sophie Rowitch
Lindsey Benitz, Maija Benitz, and Annika Benitz Chaloff
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors
vi
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors vii
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
viii Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors ix
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
x Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xi
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xii Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xiii
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xiv Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xv
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xvi Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xvii
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xviii Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xix
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xx Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xxi
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xxii Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xxiii
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xxiv Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xxv
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xxvi Contributors
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xxvii
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xxviii Contributors
Chris H.P. van den Akker, MD, PhD Marty O. Visscher, PhD
Pediatrician, Neonatologist Professor
Amsterdam UMC—Emma Children’s Hospital James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy
Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Cincinnati, Ohio
Amsterdam,The Netherlands Physiologic Development of the Skin
General Concepts of Protein Metabolism
Caitlin E. Vonderohe, DVM, PhD
John Nicolaas van den Anker, MD, PhD Postdoctoral Fellow
Chief, Clinical Pharmacology USDA-ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center
Department of Pediatrics Department of Pediatrics
Children’s National Health System Baylor College of Medicine
Washington, District of Columbia Houston,Texas
Chair, Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics Trophic Factors and Regulation of Gastrointestinal Tract
Department of Pediatrics and Liver Development
University Children’s Hospital Basel
Basel, Switzerland Neha V. Vyas, MD
Faculty, Intensive Care Pediatric Endocrinology Fellow
Pediatric Surgery Pediatric Endocrinology
Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children’s Hospital Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital
Rotterdam,The Netherlands Cleveland, Ohio
The Physiology of Placental Drug Disposition Luteinizing Hormone and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
Secretion in the Fetus and Newborn Infant
Maurice J.B. van den Hoff, PhD
Associate Professor Annette Wacker-Gussmann, MD
Department of Medical Biology Department of Sport and Health Sciences
Amsterdam UMC Institute of Preventive Pediatrics
Amsterdam,The Netherlands Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects
Cardiovascular Development German Heart Center
Munich, Germany
Johannes (Hans) B. van Goudoever, MD, PhD Developmental Electrophysiology in the Fetus and Neonate
Professor
Amsterdam UMC—Emma Children’s Hospital Abby Walch, MD
Department of Pediatrics Clinical Fellow
University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Pediatric Endocrinology
Amsterdam,The Netherlands University of California, San Francisco
General Concepts of Protein Metabolism San Francisco, California
Development of the Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis
Mark H. Vickers, PhD in the Fetus
Professor
Liggins Institute Megan J. Wallace, BSc, BSc (Hons), PhD
University of Auckland Associate Professor
Auckland, New Zealand Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Epigenetics Director, Medical Student Research
School of Medicine
Alexander A. Vinks, PhD, PharmD Monash University
Cincinnati Children’s Research Foundation Endowed Chair Head, Lung Development Research Group
Professor of Pediatrics and Pharmacology The Ritchie Centre
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Director, Division of Clinical Pharmacology Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Director, Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology Fellowship Program Physiologic Mechanisms of Normal and Altered Lung
Scientific Director, Pharmacy Research in Patient Services Growth Before and After Birth
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio Brian H. Walsh, MB, BCh, PhD
Pharmacogenomics Physician
Department of Neonatology
Daniela Virgintino, MD Cork University Maternity Hospital
Professor Cork, Ireland
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences, and Intraventricular Hemorrhage in the Neonate
Sensory Organs
University of Bari School of Medicine Jennifer A. Wambach, MD
Bari, Italy Associate Professor
Development of the Blood-Brain Barrier Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics
Washington University School of Medicine
St. Louis, Missouri
Genetics and Physiology of Surfactant Protein Deficiencies
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contributors xxix
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
xxx Contributors
Bradley A. Yoder, MD
Professor
Department of Pediatrics
University of Utah Health
Salt Lake City, Utah
Impaired Lung Growth After Injury in Preterm Lung
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Preface
The care of critically ill newborn infants has its foundations in physiologic medicine by Can Ince.1 Dr. Ince has suggested
neonatal physiology. Practitioners have traditionally used general four pillars of personalized physiology: fitness and frailty (to
physiologic principles in combination with clinical effectiveness determine physiologic reserve), organ function response to
studies to provide the most appropriate care. The sixth edition therapy, hemodynamic coherence (assessment of the macro- and
of Fetal and Neonatal Physiology marks the beginning of a new micro-circulations to determine appropriate resuscitation), and
era in our specialty in which care providers will use genetic integration and feedback (which provides ongoing assessments
information, biomarkers, and big data to make clinical decisions. and includes predictive models).
We are poised to rapidly diagnose and better understand the Our specialty is poised to apply these four pillars to neonatal
genetic basis of a variety of diseases affecting newborn infants, intensive care, and we believe the sixth edition of Fetal and
including chronic lung disease, necrotizing enterocolitis, Neonatal Physiology will help support this. Most of the 174
retinopathy of prematurity, white matter injury, and sepsis.Whole chapters in the book have been extensively updated by nearly
genome sequencing (WGS) to identify the genetic basis for 400 authors. More than 1500 visual elements—photographs,
complex neonatal diseases (and to identify potentially treatable illustrations, diagrams, charts, tables—are included, and we are
conditions) is becoming a bedside tool and will practically pleased to offer over 100 brand new color illustrations and
support pharmacogenomics to tailor treatments for neonatal diagrams to illuminate the text. The genetics content has been
conditions and limit side effects. Indeed, in the next 2 decades expanded to include new chapters such as “Pathophysiology of
we expect WGS to augment newborn screening, providing Genetic Neonatal Disease” and “Genetic Variants and Neonatal
information not only for NICU care but extending across the Disease.” Each of the chapters on disease pathophysiology has
life span. In a critically ill infant, repeated RNA sequencing may been extensively revised by leading experts in our specialty.
be needed as a new parameter to monitor changes during the We want to thank many individuals who made this edition
course of the illness. Well done randomized clinical trials will possible, including foremost the chapter authors who not
always be necessary to test the hypotheses that a new therapy only wrote superb chapters but who also adhered to the tight
is better or equivalent to a current therapy. However, success of production schedule. We deeply appreciate the editorial help
any clinical trial begins with having a strong physiologic basis from two individuals at Elsevier. Mary Hegeler was our content
for any given intervention, and ensuring the enrollment of well- development specialist, without whom we could never have
phenotyped and endotyped subjects will enhance the precision, done this revision. She was with us every step of the way and
success, and impact of such studies. Unfortunately, most provided invaluable guidance as we moved through the stages of
randomized trials are based upon a best guess or power analysis book development. We also wish to thank Sarah Barth at Elsevier
of sample size and with limited insights into critical differences who supported the decision to undertake the sixth edition.
within the cohort that may affect outcomes. No matter how Finally, we would like to thank the many readers of Fetal
carefully patients are selected for a trial, underlying biases and and Neonatal Physiology, who provided the stimulus and
physiologic differences will still exist and must be considered a encouragement to revise the book.
priori. Data unable to demonstrate differences in two treatment
arms does not mean an individual patient may not benefit. For RAP
precision medicine to be effective, genetic information must SHA
become available on a continuous and real-time basis and linked WEB
with ongoing assessment of organ function. This concept is DHR
not unique to neonatology and has been termed personalized
xxxi
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
SECTION I
Genetics and Embryology
1
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2 SECTION I — Genetics and Embryology
Transcription
Splicing
Transcript
Fig. 1.1 Gene structure (top) and (RNA) Capping, Polyadenylation
the flow of genetic information from Transport to cytoplasm
DNA to protein. Tan boxes indicate
AUG Stop
the regions of exons that do not en-
code amino acid sequences; gray
boxes indicate posttranscriptional
modifications. AUG is a codon that
specifies the amino acid methionine Translation
and is also used to specify the first
amino acid of a protein. Protein
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 1 — Basic Genetic Principles 3
involves the exchange of genetic material between the two homologs The boundary between the introns and exons consists of a
during meiosis I, and it is also critical for proper chromosome 5′ donor GT dinucleotide and a 3′ acceptor AG dinucleotide.
segregation during meiosis. Failure to recombine correctly can lead Besides the canonical splice sequences, there are also splicing
to nondisjunction of the chromosomes in meiosis I and is a frequent regulatory elements such as exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs)
cause of aneuploidy (incorrect chromosome number) leading to and exonic splicing silencers (ESSs). ESEs and ESSs correspond
pregnancy loss and congenital anomalies. to six to eight nucleotides that serve as docking sites for splicing
activator or splicing repressor proteins, thereby influencing the
recruitment and activity of the splicing machinery.8 Most human
HOW GENES FUNCTION genes undergo alternative splicing and hence encode more than
one protein for each gene. Alternative polyadenylation creates
FLOW OF GENETIC INFORMATION further diversity. Some genes have more than one promoter, and
TRANSCRIPTION these alternative promoters may result in tissue-specific isoforms.
The first step in gene expression is the production of an RNA Alternative splicing of exons is also seen with individual exons
molecule from the DNA template. The RNA acts as a molecular present in only some isoforms.
messenger, carrying the genetic information out of the nucleus
to the cytoplasm. The synthesis of mRNA is called transcription TRANSLATION
because the genetic information in DNA is transcribed. During The production of protein from a mRNA template is called
transcription, the two DNA strands separate, and one functions translation because the genetic information that is encoded in
as a template for the synthesis of single-stranded RNA molecules DNA is translated into a sequence of amino acids in the protein.
by RNA polymerases. The initial RNA transcripts are quite long The genetic information is stored in the genetic code. Each of the
because they include both introns and exons from the gene. three adjacent nucleotides is a unit of information called a codon
The intronic sequences are cut out, and the remaining exons and specifies an amino acid or the start or stop of translation.
are spliced together. To form the mature mRNAs that leave the The linear codons in the DNA sequence specify the sequence
nucleus, a methylated guanine nucleotide called a cap is added to of amino acids in a protein. Because each of the three sites in
the 5′ end, and a string of 200 to 250 adenine (polyA tail) bases is a codon can be one of four possible nucleotides, a total of 43,
added to the 3′ end. The cap is necessary for ribosomal binding or 64, different codons are possible. Three of these 64 possible
to initiate protein synthesis, and the polyadenosine stretch at the codons, UAA, UAG, and UGA, are called termination codons. The
3′ end increases the stability of the mRNA. remaining 61 codons specify one of the 20 amino acids, leading to
Transcriptional control is central for the development some degeneracy in coding certain amino acids. A consequence
and proper functioning of every organism. Transcriptional of degeneracy is that some DNA variants do not result in a change
regulation is accomplished by modifying the DNA (e.g., cytosine in the amino acid sequence (synonymous variants).
methylation) or by protein binding to specific DNA sequences
to activate or repress transcription of a gene. There are many EPIGENETICS
sequence-specific transcription factors that are differentially In addition to the classic transcription factors that bind to specific
active by cellular and tissue type and time in development. Several sequence elements in genes, gene expression is controlled by
regulatory sequences have been identified in promoters that are enzymes that modify DNA-bound proteins and DNA itself. The
important for transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerase II,
including the TATA box, so-called because it consists of a run of
T and A base pairs. The TATA box is located approximately 30
bases before the transcription start site and functions as the
binding site for a large, multisubunit complex of transcription
factors (including RNA polymerase). A second conserved region,
the so-called CAT box, is a few dozen base pairs farther upstream.
Specific sequence elements that form promoters and enhancers
are required for binding the ∼1400 sequence-specific proteins Fig. 1.3 Recombination. In this simplified view of recombination, the
that bind to DNA and regulate transcription. Mutations in these two members of a homologous pair of chromosomes line up during
regulatory sequence elements can lead to significant alterations the first meiotic prophase. Segments of the two chromosomes “cross
in transcription and also can lead to genetic disorders. over,” and breakage and rejoining of the DNA strands occur.
A B
Fig. 1.2 Mosaicism. (A) Confined placental mosaicism. Presence of mutant cells only in the placental tissue, not in the fetus. (B) Somatic mosai-
cism. Presence of two or more mutant cell lineages in tissues and may have a clinically observable phenotype in the part of the body with the
genetic aberration.
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
4 SECTION I — Genetics and Embryology
principal mechanism by which DNA is modified is by methylation an increase in the number of copies of triplet repeats in the
of cytosine residues adjacent to guanosine. Methylation of these coding or noncoding region of a gene. These disorders include
CpG dinucleotides by DNA methylases leads to transcriptional myotonic dystrophy, fragile X syndrome, and Huntington disease.
inactivation, while demethylation by demethylases alters the The repeat size can increase with successive generations, and
conformation of chromatin, leading to transcriptional activation. as the repeat number increases, the age of onset of the disease
Histone proteins are extensively modified by many enzymes, decreases, giving rise to the phenomenon of anticipation.
including acetylases, kinases, and methylases. The pattern of
histone modification, particularly on lysine residues, controls HOW MANY MENDELIAN CONDITIONS ARE THERE?
whether a particular region of chromatin will be transcriptionally There are 8319 Mendelian phenotypes described. A total of 5489
active or inactive. of them (66%) have an associated known underlying gene. A total
Modifications of chromatin proteins and DNA can be inherited of 20% (3912/19,580) of human genes are known to underlie
through multiple cell divisions. Such alterations that do not a Mendelian phenotype.9 This information is curated in Online
change the DNA sequence itself and are called epigenetic. Genetic Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM),10 which is a continuation
diseases that affect this process exemplify the importance of of Mendelian Inheritance in Man (MIM), published between 1966
epigenetics. For example, mutations in MeCP2, a protein that and 1998.
binds to methylated DNA to repress the expression of associated
genes, cause Rett syndrome, an X-linked neurodegenerative CHROMOSOMAL MUTATIONS
disease. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome is caused by mutations in Mutations in chromosome structure include deletions, dupli-
the CBP gene, encoding CREB-binding protein, which acts to cations, inversions, and translocations. Because chromosomal
acetylate the histone proteins that are major components of alterations usually result in the disruption of multiple genes,
chromatin. they often have profound clinical consequences that include
more than one organ system (see Fig. 1.4B).
If the total amount of genetic material is normal (just simply
GENETIC VARIATION rearranged), then the karyotype is balanced. A deletion is the
loss of a part of a chromosome and results in monosomy for
A locus is a particular position on a chromosome for a specific that segment of the chromosome. An insertion is the addition
gene and related DNA elements. Alleles refer to an alternative of a segment of DNA into a chromosome. An insertion is often
version of the DNA sequence at a locus. Generally, one of the associated with an unbalanced chromosome complement.
alternative alleles is found in more than half of the population and An inversion is a two-break rearrangement involving a single
is called is the major allele. The other versions of that gene refer
to variants or minor alleles. Allele frequencies vary significantly A. Single-Gene Mutations
in different populations. If an allele frequency is greater than 1%,
it is said to be a polymorphism (multiple forms). ATG · CTA · CGC · TGG · ACA · AGC
Mutation is generally meant to signify a DNA sequence that is Normal
Met · Leu · Arg · Try · Thr · Ser
deleterious and associated with a human disease. Mutations can
be germline and inherited from one or both parents, or somatic ATG · CCA · CGC · TGG · ACA · AGC
and acquired over the life of an individual. Mutations can vary Missense
Met · Pro · Arg · Try · Thr · Ser
by the size of the altered DNA sequence. The size of mutations
can range from a single nucleotide to the rearrangements of an ATG · CTT · CGC · TGG · ACA · AGC
entire chromosome. By convention, we have a reference genome Silent
Met · Leu · Arg · Try · Thr · Ser
that is used to compare genetic variants. This reference genome
is updated as we understand the human genome better. ATG · CTA · CGC · TGA · ACA · AGC
Nonsense
Met · Leu · Arg · (Stop)
SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE VARIATIONS
ATG · CGT · ACG · CTG · GAC · AAG · C
When a “point mutation” of one or a small number of nucleotides Frameshift (insertion)
Met · Arg · Thr · Leu · ASD · Lys
occurs in a part of the gene that codes for a protein and alters the
protein by changing the codon of which it is a part, it is called
a nonsynonymous variant (Fig. 1.4A). Because the genetic B. Chromosomal Mutations
code is degenerate, it is possible to have a point mutation that
Normal Deletions Duplication Inversions Translocation
does not change the amino acid that is encoded. This is called a
synonymous variant. Insertion or deletion of a nucleotide in the A A A A A A A 1
B B B B B D B 2
protein-coding portion of a gene is called a frameshift mutation C
C 3
C C C C C
because it changes the entire reading frame of the gene at every D G D D D B D 4
E H E E G E E G
codon distal to the site of the mutation. Nonsense mutations F F D F F F H
are those point mutations that result in one of the three codons G E E G 5
H F H H 6
(UAA, UAG, UGA) that do not code for amino acids but rather G 7
truncate proteins, often producing proteins with little or no H
activity if they occur early enough in the protein. Point mutations Fig. 1.4 Mutation. (A) Single-gene mutations. A prototypical nor-
occurring at the boundaries between introns and exons can mal gene sequence is shown on the first line, with the corresponding
cause improper splicing of RNA precursors, resulting in aberrant amino acid sequence. Examples of four types of common mutations
splicing or RNA instability. also are shown. The substituted or inserted nucleotides are indicated
Regulation of gene expression can be affected by mutations by arrows, and the affected amino acids are underlined. (B) Chro-
occurring in control elements, such as promoters and enhancers; mosomal mutations. A prototype normal chromosome is shown, with
the effect of such mutations is to quantitatively affect the amount genes A through H. Examples of gross chromosomal mutations are
of protein produced, such as occurs in some forms of thalassemia. shown to the right, and their effects on gene content and arrangement
A different mutational mechanism involves the expansion are indicated. In the translocation example, the two chromosomes are
of triplet repeat sequences (dynamic mutations), caused by not members of a homologous pair.
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 1 — Basic Genetic Principles 5
chromosome in which a segment is flipped and reversed in be helpful in predicting recurrence risk for the parents. Some
position. If the inversion segment includes the centromere, it is deletions and insertions involve only a few nucleotides and are
termed a pericentric inversion. If it involves only one arm of the generally most easily detected by sequencing the relevant part of
chromosome and does not involve the centromere, it is known the genome. In other cases, a large segment of a gene, an entire
as a paracentric inversion. A translocation refers to the transfer gene, or several adjacent genes are deleted, duplicated, inverted,
of genetic material from one chromosome to another. If two or translocated and create a novel arrangement. Depending on
different chromosome breaks and the chromosome segments the exact nature of the deletion, insertion, or rearrangement, a
are exchanged, it is called a reciprocal translocation. If the variety of different laboratory approaches can be used to detect
translocation occurs between two acrocentric chromosomes the genomic alteration, including karyotype, fluorescent in situ
or chromosomes with redundant genetic material on the p arm, hybridization (FISH), chromosome microarray, or sequencing
it is called a Robertsonian translocation. Similar to inversions, methods.
translocations can be balanced or unbalanced. Individuals
who carry translocations but who have a normal amount of ANEUPLOIDY
genetic material are called balanced translocation carriers. Aneuploidy refers to missing or additional individual
Translocations can have severe effects on offspring if the progeny chromosomes in the cell (a number other than 46 chromosomes).
has an unbalanced complement. When counseling a carrier of a Aneuploidies of chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 are among the
balanced reciprocal translocation or Robertsonian translocation, most clinically important of the chromosome abnormalities.
it is necessary to consider the particular rearrangement to They consist of monosomy (the presence of only one copy of
determine what the probability is that it could result in the birth a chromosome in an otherwise diploid cell) and trisomy (three
of an abnormal baby. Translocation carriers are at increased risk copies of a chromosome). Nondisjunction causes errors in
of miscarriage of unbalanced products of conception. chromosome segregation and leads to aneuploidies. Multiple
A ring chromosome is formed when a break occurs on each congenital anomalies, growth restriction, and intellectual
arm of a chromosome leaving two “sticky” ends on the central disability are the most common phenotypes of these trisomies.
portion of the chromosome that reunite as a ring. The two distal Nevertheless,each has a reasonably unique neonatal phenotype
chromosomal fragments are lost, so if the involved chromosome that is recognizable by an experienced clinician. Trisomy 13 and
is an autosome, the effects are usually severe. 18 are both less common than trisomy 21, and survival beyond
Structural variant (SV) refers to genomic rearrangements the first year is rare for trisomy 13 and 18. In contrast, individuals
and includes deletions, insertions, inversions, duplications, and with Down syndrome have a life expectancy of over 50 years.
translocations. Copy number variation (CNV) describes a group Most other autosomal trisomies result in early pregnancy loss,
of DNA sequence variants (including deletions and duplications) with trisomy 16 being a particularly common finding in first-
that result in an abnormal number of copies of segments of trimester spontaneous miscarriages.
DNA.11 Trisomy 21, which causes Down syndrome, is the most common
autosomal aneuploidy seen among live births.The most common
features include intellectual disability, hypotonia, gastrointestinal
GENETIC DISORDERS obstruction, congenital heart defects, and dysmorphic facial
features. In approximately 90% of cases, the third chromosome
CHROMOSOMAL DISORDERS 21 is of maternal origin. About 95% of Down syndrome cases
Chromosome disorders compose an important category of are caused by nondisjunction, and Robertsonian translocations
genetic disease, occurring in approximately 1 out of every 150 cause most of the remaining cases. Mosaicism is seen in 2% to 4%
live births.12 They are a common cause of intellectual disability of Down syndrome cases and is often associated with a milder
and pregnancy loss. Chromosomal disorders can be divided into phenotype.The most frequent cause of mosaicism in trisomies is
two groups: numerical and structural abnormalities. Numerical a trisomic conception followed by loss of the extra chromosome
abnormalities result from one or more chromosome gains or during mitosis in some embryonic cells (trisomic rescue).
losses, referred to as an aneuploidy (e.g., trisomy, monosomy, Trisomy 13 and 18 are sometimes compatible with survival to
tetrasomy) or the addition of one or more complete haploid term, although 95% or more of affected fetuses are spontaneously
genomes, referred to as polyploidy (e.g., triploidy, tetraploidy). aborted. These trisomies produce more severe disease than
In addition to the loss or gain of whole chromosomes, parts of trisomy 21, with 90% to 95% mortality during the first year of life.
chromosomes can be lost or duplicated as gametes are formed, Turner syndrome is most commonly associated with 45, X.
and the arrangement of portions of chromosomes can be altered. Although this disorder is common at conception, it is relatively
Structural chromosome abnormalities may be unbalanced (the rare among live births, reflecting a high rate of spontaneous
rearrangement causes a gain or loss of chromosomal material) abortion. Mosaicism, including confined placental mosaicism,
or balanced (the rearrangement does not produce a loss or appears to increase the probability of survival to term. Klinefelter
gain of chromosome material). Molecular methods including syndrome occurs in men who receive two X chromosomes in
chromosome microarrays are often helpful to sensitively detect addition to the Y chromosome. The presence of an extra sex
gains, losses, and rearrangements that may be missed by standard chromosome (X or Y) has only mild phenotypic effects.
karyotype alone. Unlike aneuploidy and polyploidy, balanced
structural abnormalities less frequently produce serious health GENOMIC DISORDERS (MICRODELETION AND
consequences, and many are compatible with normal health and DUPLICATION SYNDROMES, STRUCTURAL VARIATIONS,
behavior. However, unbalanced abnormalities of chromosome COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS)
structure and even some that are balanced but that disrupt key Chromosomal deletions and duplications are an important
genes can create severe disease in individuals or their offspring. cause of human malformations and intellectual disability. Those
The phenotype associated with the chromosome disorder tends caused by submicroscopic changes were not easily detectable
to run true in the family when inherited, so testing the parents to with a standard karyotype (with a resolution of approximately
determine if a chromosome disorder is inherited or de novo is often 5 to 10 Mb). With the advent of high-resolution banding, it
recommended by a geneticist. Some structural alterations can be has become feasible to identify smaller deletions. Advances in
caused by translocations (reciprocal or Robertsonian), insertion, molecular genetics, mainly the FISH and chromosome microarray
deletion, or rearrangement of DNA sequences, so examination techniques, have permitted the detection of deletions that are
of the parents of a child with a complex rearrangement may often too small to be observed microscopically (i.e., <5 Mb).
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
6 SECTION I — Genetics and Embryology
Because these syndromes generally involve the deletion or the gene/gene(s) that are imprinted. The imprint is maintained
duplication of a series of adjacent genes, it is sometimes referred throughout the life of the organism, in virtually all tissues; however,
to as a contiguous gene syndrome. Recent studies show that germ cells erase and then reset imprints for transmission to the
this is caused by the presence of flanking repeat sequences, next generation. Imprinting disorders can be caused by:
termed low-copy repeats (also termed segmental duplications),
(a) sequence mutation of the relevant gene (UBE3A for Angel-
at the deletion borders. These repeat sequences favor unequal
man syndrome),
crossing-over, which then produces duplications and deletions of
(b) deletion or duplication of imprinted genes,
the region bounded by the repeat elements. These disorders are
(c) UPD, or
collectively called genomic disorders.13
(d) epigenetic errors in imprinting centers causing faulty imprint-
Some of well-known genomic disorders and their associated
ing.
clinical features are shown in Table 1.1.
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 1 — Basic Genetic Principles 7
may have greater clinical significance than imbalance for genes same mutation (intrafamilial variation). Pleiotropy is when a
on Xq, where the effect is mostly normalized by X inactivation. mutation in a single gene has effects on the body in more than
one way (e.g., congenital heart disease and intellectual disability).
SINGLE-GENE DISORDERS The proportion of cases resulting from new (de novo)
A trait or disorder that is determined by a gene on an autosome is mutations varies considerably between different AD conditions.
said to show autosomal inheritance, whereas a trait or disorder In some disorders, the de novo mutation rate is high (nearly 100%
determined by a gene on one of the sex chromosomes is said to of cases), whereas for some other conditions, a new mutation is
show sex-linked inheritance. For autosomal loci, the genotype unusual.
of a person at a locus consists of both of the alleles occupying In many AD disorders, reproductive fitness is zero, (i.e.,
that locus on the two homologous chromosomes. If two alleles mutation carriers do not reproduce). Such a condition is
are the same for a particular locus, the genotype is homozygous. maintained in the population entirely by new mutations, and
When the alleles are different, and one of the alleles is the the majority of cases are due to de novo mutations (although
reference allele (common variant in the population), it is called parental germline mosaicism may sometimes lead to recurrence
heterozygous. If the two alleles are different and neither is in a sibling). Many other AD disorders have only modest effects
the reference allele, it is called compound heterozygote. The on reproductive fitness.
term hemizygous refers to one abnormal allele located on the
X chromosome in a male. Mitochondrial loci are present in AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE DISORDERS
thousands of copies per cell; thus the terms mentioned herein Autosomal recessive (AR) conditions occur when the mutant
are not used to describe mitochondrial genotypes. allele is present in both copies of the gene. Heterozygous
There are two types of genetic heterogeneity. Allelic individuals are said to be carriers for that condition and are
heterogeneity is when many different mutations in one gene cause asymptomatic (see Fig. 1.5B).
similar phenotypes. Locus heterogeneity is when mutations in
several different genes all cause a similar phenotype. Phenotype Principles of Autosomal Recessive Inheritance
is the expression of genotype as a morphologic, clinical, cellular, • D isease is expressed only in homozygotes and compound
or biochemical trait, which may be clinically observable or may heterozygotes.
only be detected by blood or tissue testing. The phenotype can • Parents are obligate carriers.
be discrete or can be a measured quantity, such as body mass • Risk to carrier parents for having an affected child is 1 in 4.
index or blood glucose levels. • Healthy siblings of affected individuals have a two-thirds risk
of being a carrier.
AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT DISORDERS • Males and females are affected equally.
Autosomal dominant (AD) disorders manifest in heterozygous
individuals who have a single copy of the mutant allele. Many
molecular mechanisms are associated with AD inheritance,
including haploinsufficiency (loss of function of one amorphic Autosomal dominant Autosomal recessive
allele), hypomorphic alleles with decreased function,
hypermorphic alleles exhibiting gain of function (constitutive
protein activity), neomorphic alleles that acquire a new function
(such as altered substrate specificity), and toxic (antimorphic)
effects of a protein, leading to dominant-negative (DN)
mechanisms (Fig. 1.5A). A B
Principles of Autosomal Dominant Inheritance
• M ales and females are affected equally. X-linked recessive X-linked dominant
• Males and females can both transmit the disorder.
• There is a 50% risk to offspring in any pregnancy in which one
parent carries a mutation.
• The severity of the disorder in the offspring may vary, being
similar, more severe, or less severe than in the parent.
• Many AD disorders are due to de novo mutations. C D
Dominant diseases show the same phenotype in either the Mitochondrial inheritance
X-linked dominant, male lethality
heterozygous or homozygous state. The majority of AD disorders
are incompletely dominant or semidominant, which means
homozygous individuals have a more severe phenotype than
heterozygous individuals. In codominant inheritance, both alleles
are phenotypically expressed (e.g., ABO blood group).
Penetrance is the percentage of individuals who carry the E F
relevant genotype and have signs or symptoms of the disorder.
If all individuals who have a disease genotype show the disease Normal male
phenotype, then the disease is said to be “fully penetrant,” or Normal female
to have a penetrance of 100%. Many dominant disorders show Affected male
age-dependent penetrance. Some conditions show incomplete
Affected female
penetrance (i.e., not all mutation carriers will manifest the
Carrier
disease during a natural lifespan).
Abortion
Expressivity is the difference in the severity of a disorder in
individuals who have inherited the same disease alleles. Many Fig. 1.5 (A–F) Pedigrees for disorders exhibiting the various men-
genetic conditions show a striking difference between families delian and mitochondrial modes of inheritance. These are idealized
(interfamilial variation) and also within families carrying the pedigrees, assuming full penetrance and no new mutations.
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
8 SECTION I — Genetics and Embryology
• M ales carrying the mutation are more severely affected; (50% to 75%) of rare diseases affect children.14 Making an
females carrying the mutation are generally either unaffected accurate diagnosis is fundamental to good patient care. Molecular
or more mildly affected than males, and severity in females diagnoses for patients with rare disorders are important for
depends on the X-inactivation pattern. patients and their families to refine prognosis, management,
• When a carrier female conceives, there are four possible recurrence risk, and reproductive options; identify other families
outcomes, each equally likely: a normal daughter, a carrier with the same condition; and participate in research for new
daughter, a normal son, and an affected son. sources of support and therapies.15 It is important to diagnose
• The pedigree shows no male-to-male transmission. rare diseases early in the disease course, when the medical and
• An affected male transmits the mutation to all his daughters. financial burdens to families are fairly minimal, and then proceed
with treatment.16 Increasingly, genomic diagnostic methods
are more comprehensive and support more facile diagnoses of
X-LINKED DOMINANT DISORDERS
genetic conditions.
Principles of X-Linked Dominant Inheritance
See Fig. 1.5D. CLINICAL APPROACH TO CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
AND THE DYSMORPHIC CHILD
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 1 — Basic Genetic Principles 9
continued follow-up is important because additional clinical indication for testing (incidental findings such as mutations for
features may become apparent over time and aid in making hereditary cancer or hereditary causes of sudden cardiac death).
the diagnosis; in addition, clinical diagnostic lab methods may When the laboratory systematically and intentionally looks for
continue to evolve and improve. variants in a prespecified set of genes unrelated to the primary
indication, these are termed secondary findings. The consent
DIAGNOSTIC METHODS IN CLINICAL GENETICS process is important to determine which findings the patient
There are many methods for clinical genetic testing, each of which would like to receive. Thus the generally accepted approach for
has been developed for particular clinical scenarios, including incidental findings is to examine the exome/genome data for
carrier screening, non-invasive prenatal testing, newborn pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 59 genes.20
screening, and diagnostic testing, with chromosome analyses to A summary comparing the different clinical genetic testing
detect copy number variants and cytogenetic rearrangement and methods is provided in Table 1.2.
sequence-based tests.17
Many types of chromosomal abnormalities have been NEED FOR VARIANT REINTERPRETATION OVER TIME
clinically and cytogenetically described and are diagnosed using A significant challenge associated with the clinical implementation
conventional karyotyping, FISH, and chromosomal microarray of next-generation sequencing for large panels and exomes/
(CMA). CMA is routinely performed as part of the comprehensive genomes is the large number of variants identified. Distinguishing
diagnostic testing for patients with unexplained developmental which of these variants is pathogenic is difficult since many of
delay/intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, or the variants identified are rare or novel and little is known about
multiple congenital anomalies.18 CMA is now routinely performed them. In addition, because not all disease genes have yet been
as oligoarrays, with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) identified, a diagnosis may be missed, despite comprehensive
probes to provide high resolution for copy number variants and exome/genome sequencing, because the condition has not yet
identify UPD and long stretches of homozygosity in families with been scientifically recognized. Re-evaluation of sequence data
consanguinity.19 over time may clarify the pathogenicity of variants and yield
Sanger sequencing was the primary genetic test for the additional diagnoses as scientific understanding of genetic variants
diagnosis for monogenic disorders due to sequence variants; and additional genetic conditions advances.Thus reanalyzing and
however, the decreased cost and increased throughput of reinterpreting clinical sequence data is inevitable. The ordering
massive parallel next-generation sequencing has significantly healthcare provider, clinical geneticist, clinical laboratory, and
increased the number of conditions that can simultaneously be patient/family each may have a role regarding reinterpretation
tested and can now include an entire genome. For conditions of genetic results.21,22 These expectations should be clearly
that are genetically heterogeneous, rather than selecting a outlined as part of the informed consent process.
single gene to test, it is now routine to test for a panel of genes
causing a particular phenotype/disease. In addition, whole
exome sequencing (WES), of all coding segments of almost all FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN CLINICAL
genes, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) are feasible and GENETICS
can even be performed within 1 to 2 weeks. As the number
of genes assessed increases, the number of genetic variants EARLIER DIAGNOSIS, INCREASINGLY PRENATAL
that could be pathogenic also increases. The laboratory may Making a genetic diagnosis earlier in life has a greater impact
issue a report with several variants in several genes as possible on medical care and may afford more effective treatment
diagnoses and then rely on the geneticist to further assess the opportunities and minimize harm by decreasing the number of
likelihood of the possibilities. Additionally, not all variants are unnecessary diagnostic procedures or ineffective interventions.
detectable by exome/genome sequencing. Triplet repeats and Rapid diagnosis in the neonatal or even prenatal period allows
somatic mutations can be particularly difficult or impossible providers and parents to make more informed decisions about
to detect based upon current sequencing methods and read care, obtain more accurate prognostic information, and draw
depth. upon experience with the genetic condition. Rapid diagnosis of
As the amount of genetic data generated increases with genetic acutely ill patients in neonatal intensive care unit is increasingly
testing, such as WES and WGS, there is a chance of identifying gene common and decreases costs and length of stay.23 One of the
variants of clinical relevance that were not related to the primary most common uses of NGS is non-invasive prenatal screening
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
10 SECTION I — Genetics and Embryology
SUGGESTED READINGS
CONCLUSION Nussbaum R, McInnes R, Willard H. Thompson & Thompson Genetics In Medicine.
8th ed. Elsevier; 2016.
The Human Genome Project has had a significant impact on Turnpenny P, Ellard S. Emery’s Elements of Medical Genetics. 15th ed.
Elsevier; 2017.
medicine and especially neonatology. We routinely use genomic Jorde L, Carey J, Bamshad M. Medical Genetics. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
methods and data to diagnose genetic diseases in newborns, Firth H, Hurst J. Oxford Desk Reference Clinical Genetics and Genomics. 2nd ed.
especially those associated with congenital anomalies, neurologic Oxford University Press; 2017.
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 2 — Epigenetics 11
REFERENCES 14. European Organisation for Rare Diseases. Rare diseases: understanding this pub-
lic health priority. Eurordis. 2005.
1. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al.The sequence of the human genome. Sci- 15. Wright CF, FitzPatrick DR, Firth HV. Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare dis-
ence. 2001;291(5507):1304–1351. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058040. ease in children. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(5):253–268. https://doi.org/10.1038/
2. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human nrg.2017.116.
genome. Nature. 2001;409(6822):860–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/35057062. 16. Boycott KM, Rath A, Chong JX, et al. International cooperation to enable the
3. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxy- diagnosis of all rare genetic diseases. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(5):695–705.
ribose nucleic acid. Nature. 1953;171(4356):737–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.04.003.
4. Tukiainen T, Villani AC, Yen A, et al. Landscape of X chromosome inactiva- 17. Katsanis SH, Katsanis N. Molecular genetic testing and the future of clini-
tion across human tissues. Nature. 2017;550(7675):244–248. https://doi. cal genomics. Genomic Precis Med Found Transl Implement Third Ed.
org/10.1038/nature24265. 2016;14(6):263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800681-8.00018-9.
5. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in 18. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal micro-
the human genome. Nature. 2012;489(7414):57–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/ array is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental
nature11247. disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86(5):749–764.
6. Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ. Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006.
Cell. 2009;136(4):642–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035. 19. Harel T, Lupski JR. Genomic disorders 20 years on-mechanisms for clinical mani-
7. Kalousek DK, Vekemans M. Confined placental mosaicism. J Med Genet. festations. Clin Genet. 2018;93(3):439–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13146.
1996;33(7):529–533. 20. Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, et al. Recommendations for reporting of second-
8. Soukarieh O, Gaildrat P, Hamieh M, et al. Exonic splicing mutations are ary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG
more prevalent than currently estimated and can be predicted by using in SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics
silico tools. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017;19(2):249–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/
pgen.1005756. gim.2016.190.
9. Centers for Mendelian Genomics. Mendelian traits by the numbers. 21. David KL, Best RG, Brenman LM, et al. Patient re-contact after revision of
http://mendelian.org/mendelian-traits-numbers. Accessed September 18, 2020. genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College
10. Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, Scott AF, Hamosh A. OMIM.org: leveraging knowledge of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2018;0(0):1–3. https://
across phenotype-gene relationships. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D1038– doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0391-z.
D1043. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1151. 22. Bombard Y, Brothers KB, Fitzgerald-Butt S, et al. The responsibility to recontact
11. Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyp- research participants after reinterpretation of genetic and genomic research
ing. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(5):363–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2958. results. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(4):578–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
12. Hsu L. Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Abnormalities Through Amnio- ajhg.2019.02.025.
centesis in Genetic Disorders and the Fetus. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins 23. Farnaes L, Hildreth A, Sweeney NM, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing
University Press; 1992. decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization. Npj Genomic Med.
13. Lupski JR. 2018 Victor A. McKusick Leadership Award: Molecular Mecha- 2018;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-018-0049-4.
nisms for Genomic and Chromosomal Rearrangements. Am J Hum Genet. 24. High KA, Roncarolo MG. Gene therapy. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(5):455–464.
2019;104(3):391–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.12.018. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1706910.
Epigenetics 2
William Schierding | Mark H. Vickers | Justin M. O’Sullivan | Wayne S. Cutfield
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 2 — Epigenetics 11
REFERENCES 14. European Organisation for Rare Diseases. Rare diseases: understanding this pub-
lic health priority. Eurordis. 2005.
1. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al.The sequence of the human genome. Sci- 15. Wright CF, FitzPatrick DR, Firth HV. Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare dis-
ence. 2001;291(5507):1304–1351. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058040. ease in children. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(5):253–268. https://doi.org/10.1038/
2. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human nrg.2017.116.
genome. Nature. 2001;409(6822):860–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/35057062. 16. Boycott KM, Rath A, Chong JX, et al. International cooperation to enable the
3. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxy- diagnosis of all rare genetic diseases. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(5):695–705.
ribose nucleic acid. Nature. 1953;171(4356):737–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.04.003.
4. Tukiainen T, Villani AC, Yen A, et al. Landscape of X chromosome inactiva- 17. Katsanis SH, Katsanis N. Molecular genetic testing and the future of clini-
tion across human tissues. Nature. 2017;550(7675):244–248. https://doi. cal genomics. Genomic Precis Med Found Transl Implement Third Ed.
org/10.1038/nature24265. 2016;14(6):263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800681-8.00018-9.
5. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in 18. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal micro-
the human genome. Nature. 2012;489(7414):57–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/ array is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental
nature11247. disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86(5):749–764.
6. Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ. Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006.
Cell. 2009;136(4):642–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035. 19. Harel T, Lupski JR. Genomic disorders 20 years on-mechanisms for clinical mani-
7. Kalousek DK, Vekemans M. Confined placental mosaicism. J Med Genet. festations. Clin Genet. 2018;93(3):439–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13146.
1996;33(7):529–533. 20. Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, et al. Recommendations for reporting of second-
8. Soukarieh O, Gaildrat P, Hamieh M, et al. Exonic splicing mutations are ary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG
more prevalent than currently estimated and can be predicted by using in SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics
silico tools. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017;19(2):249–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/
pgen.1005756. gim.2016.190.
9. Centers for Mendelian Genomics. Mendelian traits by the numbers. 21. David KL, Best RG, Brenman LM, et al. Patient re-contact after revision of
http://mendelian.org/mendelian-traits-numbers. Accessed September 18, 2020. genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College
10. Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, Scott AF, Hamosh A. OMIM.org: leveraging knowledge of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2018;0(0):1–3. https://
across phenotype-gene relationships. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D1038– doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0391-z.
D1043. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1151. 22. Bombard Y, Brothers KB, Fitzgerald-Butt S, et al. The responsibility to recontact
11. Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyp- research participants after reinterpretation of genetic and genomic research
ing. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(5):363–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2958. results. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(4):578–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
12. Hsu L. Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Abnormalities Through Amnio- ajhg.2019.02.025.
centesis in Genetic Disorders and the Fetus. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins 23. Farnaes L, Hildreth A, Sweeney NM, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing
University Press; 1992. decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization. Npj Genomic Med.
13. Lupski JR. 2018 Victor A. McKusick Leadership Award: Molecular Mecha- 2018;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-018-0049-4.
nisms for Genomic and Chromosomal Rearrangements. Am J Hum Genet. 24. High KA, Roncarolo MG. Gene therapy. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(5):455–464.
2019;104(3):391–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.12.018. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1706910.
Epigenetics 2
William Schierding | Mark H. Vickers | Justin M. O’Sullivan | Wayne S. Cutfield
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
12 SECTION I — Genetics and Embryology
There has been a longstanding debate as to whether health Wheels Cars (2) Wheels Cars
is determined by “nature” or “nurture.”20-22 It is clear that
phenotypic traits exist on a continuum, where some are Wheels Cars
predominantly controlled by genetics (e.g., height) and oth- (1) (3)
ers by environmental factors (e.g., obesity). However, the
influence of genes and environment in the development of Fig. 2.1 Epigenetic machinery. The following analogy can be used to
phenotypic traits is not mutually exclusive, but rather is a illustrate this point. Security guards can use keys to lock and unlock
result of their constant interaction. For example, twin stud- doors according to instructions they are receiving from another source.
ies suggest that genetic factors have a substantial effect (1 and 3) At the beginning and end of each working day, the guards go
on variations in body weight, particularly in children and through their routine of unlocking or locking doors. (2) By locking and
adolescents. Nonetheless, the fact that obesity is rapidly unlocking doors in a factory, the guards are not changing the structure
increasing worldwide shows that environment also plays a of the factory, but rather this system is akin to epigenetic modifications
significant role in the likelihood of becoming obese. Thus that limit the workers’ (i.e., the transcription factors, DNA binding pro-
in most cases the resulting manifestation of non-commu- teins, and RNA polymerases) access to the equipment and informa-
nicable disease is a combination of nature and nurture. tion within the factory. If there is an error in the unlocking routine for
Importantly, this interaction between the environment and example, part of the factory would remain off-limits to the workers for
genetic inheritance is mediated through epigenetics. one cycle of 12 hours. Thus, if the factory is a car assembly line and
the section where the wheels are stored (i.e., the gene) remains locked,
then no workers are able to access this area and the final product (i.e.,
many generations for a single mutation to become dominant in a the phenotype) is cars without wheels. (3) However, when the correct
population. By contrast, epigenetic changes can occur in a more set of keys has opened the correct factory doors, the cars and wheels
rapid timeframe.This means that epigenetics provides a mechanism will both be accessible, and the cars will be made.
for rapid responses to environmental changes. Consistent with
this, studies have shown that de novo epigenetic “mutation” is
one to two orders of magnitude more frequent than de novo THE STRUCTURE OF THE (EPI)GENOME
somatic DNA mutation.10 This difference in “mutation rates” is Eukaryotes use multiple systems to initiate and regulate changes
due to a reduction in the fidelity of maintenance of epigenetic in gene expression. In total, genes are regulated by hundreds
features, when compared to genetic features, throughout the cell of functional DNA elements, controlling when and how much
cycle.11 For example, the genetic code is copied (replicated) with protein is produced. This regulatory control occurs through
an error rate of less than 1 base in 107 to 108 bases copied.12 mechanisms that utilize epigenetic signals to affect nuclear
By contrast, epigenetic mechanisms, such as methylation, have an (e.g., transcription and mRNA processing) and cytoplasmic
error rate that has been estimated to be between 1% and 4%.4,11,13 (e.g., translation) processes (Fig. 2.1). These mechanisms include
Developmental plasticity is a genotype’s or individual’s ability DNA methylation (with or without ubiquitination),23 histone
to respond to changes in environmental conditions through modifications (i.e., acetylation, phosphorylation, sumoylation,
changes in its phenotypes. All developmental plasticity is, by methylation),24 chromatin folding,25-30 non-coding RNA (ncRNA
definition, epigenetic in origin, as the genotype of the responding and miRNA),31,32 and prions.33 Epigenetic effects on transcription
individual remains unaltered in the process. The plasticity of are well documented and will therefore form the main focus
the epigenome is important for its contribution to the dynamic of the remainder of this chapter.34-36 A summary of how these
coordination of the genome’s responses to environmental signals. various epigenetic processes are analyzed is shown in Table 2.1.
However, changing to suit the present environment can result It should be noted that epigenetic effects such as DNA
in a suboptimal phenotype for tomorrow’s environment (the methylation do not turn a gene on or off permanently. Rather,
mismatch hypothesis).14 In developmental terms, the epigenome most epigenetic mechanisms lead to semi-permanent changes.
can change to enhance fitness in response to an environmental As such, epigenetic modifications need to be continually
cue (e.g., reduced placental nutrient supply) during a small maintained by the recruitment of the required enzymes and
window in early development. Subsequent changes to the proteins to accurately replenish the epigenetic marks, and
environmental conditions (e.g., overabundance of high-energy thus contribute to the maintenance of the appropriate state of
food) mean that the epigenetic changes, which have been stably transcription.9 Epigenetic modifications only “contribute to the
maintained through the remainder of development, may become maintenance of the correct state of transcription”; other factors
detrimental over the course of the individual’s lifespan by (e.g., DNA-binding proteins and RNA polymerases) are ultimately
increasing the risk for metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.15 responsible for reading and transcribing the gene.
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 2 — Epigenetics 13
Various techniques are used to characterize epigenetic modifications. The use of antibody precipitation to isolate pieces of DNA that are methylated or
unmethylated, or are associated with modified histones is central to many of the techniques that are used to study epigenetic modifications on the local and
global scale (e.g., chromatin immunoprecipitation, ChIP-chip ChIP-seq; ChIA-PET; MeDIP).171 Modifications of methylation of cytosine in CpGs are also studied
using bisulfite conversion, which changes the 5me-C residue to a uracil.172 Finally, chromatin organization (which DNA sequences are nearby or contacting each
other within the nucleus) and the effects of epigenetic modifications on this is determined by methods that range from FISH methodologies methodologies,173,174
differential centrifugation,175 or chromosome conformation capture based technologies (e.g., 3C 3C,176 4C,177 GCC,178 or 5C179).
Gene activation is typically associated with tracts of largely two copies of the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 (see
unmethylated CpG, known as CpG islands. The majority (60%) Fig. 2.2).44 Nucleosomes are separated by exposed linker DNA
of these CpG islands occur in or near gene promoters.36,38 that is typically 20 to 50 base pairs in length.45 Only about 75% to
Methylation (a mark of down-regulation) inside or within ∼2 90% of DNA in eukaryotes is bound within a nucleosome at any
kb of these CpG islands39 contributes to the control of gene time in the cell cycle.46
expression.24 DNA methylation status is mostly controlled Nucleosomes are the targets of a wide range of post-
by the family of genes known as DNA methyltransferases translational modifications (e.g., acetylation, phosphorylation,
(DNMT). Briefly, DNMT1 controls maintenance of methylation sumoylation, and methylation) that combine to form an
(transmission from mother to daughter cells).40 DNMT 3a and epigenetic (histone) code.47 Each of the core histones (H3 and
3b are responsible for de novo methylation (establishment H4) features a long amino acid “tail,” where posttranslational
of methylation without a template or changes in methylation modifications may occur to affect gene expression. Enzymes
state),41,42 while DNMT3L is largely involved in the methylation deposit (“write”) or remove (“erase”) these histone marks of
of maternally imprinted genes (see later) during oogenesis.43 phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation. Proteins that bind
Placental growth and development are regulated in part to modified histones (“readers”) are part of larger, multisubunit
by epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation. During protein complexes that exert downstream functions (note: these
gestation, embryonic development is associated with the complexes often recognize combinations of different histone
establishment of distinct DNA methylation differences between marks simultaneously).
the trophectoderm and inner cell mass. The trophectoderm Post-translational modifications of the histone tails, or to
(ultimately placenta) becomes significantly less methylated than the central histone structure itself,34 can (1) directly affect
the inner cell mass (ultimately embryo/somatic tissues). Overall, the compaction and assembly of the chromatin by regulating
whole-term placental lysates have 14% to 25% less global DNA the interaction between the DNA and each histone within the
methylation when compared to somatic tissues. nucleosome or the between nucleosomes themselves46; or (2)
For a more exhaustive review on epigenetic marks in serve as binding sites for recruitment of other proteins that
development, see the review by Ficz and colleagues.36 themselves contribute to the regulation of transcription and
other nuclear functions.35 These modifications of the histone
HISTONE MODIFICATIONS residues (“marks”) have been correlated with various important
The most basic unit of chromatin structure is the nucleosome, genetic elements in the regulation of gene expression. Promoters
which consists of approximately 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped of transcriptionally active genes are associated with enriched
1.67 times around a barrel-shaped histone octamer containing trimethylation on histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3), and lysine
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
14 SECTION I — Genetics and Embryology
Me
C
G
G DNA methylation
C • Methyl marks repress gene activity (usually at a
cytosine residue)
Me Histone modification
Me • Different chemical groups in combination bind to
the tails of the histones and alter DNA activity
• There are more than 200 post-translational
C
modifications
G
Nucleosome 3D structure
Histone • DNA is tightly compacted around histones into chromatin
Histone tails • Chromatin can be in an open (active) or closed (inactive)
conformation
• Chromatin packaging necessitates between- and within-
Open Closed chromosome contacts that are dynamic and non-random
chromatin chromatin • Connections work to repress or activate certain regions
of the genome
Chromosome
acetylation (H3K9ac, H3K27ac). For example, an enhancer is a CHROMATIN FOLDING AND 3D STRUCTURE
genomic switch that, when activated (“turned on”), increases the A non-linear consideration of DNA is important to understand
likelihood of transcription of a particular gene. These enhancer the establishment and maintenance of enhancer-promoter
elements are defined by having both H3K27ac and H3K4me1. interactions in space and time. Nucleosomes are the lowest form
Repressed genes have a higher density of nucleosomes of structural scaffolds for DNA, which, when packaged with
(i.e., heterochromatin) and are usually marked by H3K9me, other proteins and RNA components, form compacted chromatin
H3K27me3, and H4K20me3.48 structures. The compaction levels for chromatin are not fixed
Polycomb complexes remodel chromatin to maintain but vary as the cell moves through the cell cycle. This ultimately
developmentally or environmentally programmed expression results in the structures we recognize as chromosomes, in which
states. DNA-binding proteins (or noncoding RNAs) recruit the DNA has been compacted up to 10,000-fold (see Fig. 2.2).46
polycomb-group proteins to specific regions of the genome for The dynamic process of changing the compaction level of the
epigenetic silencing of genes.For Polycomb Repressive Complex 2, DNA within a nucleus is an important component of the regulation
histone methyltransferase enzyme EZH2 regulates trimethylation of genes.52,53 At a gross level, chromatin compaction is thought
of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me2/3). Processes affected by to contribute to the two dominant types of chromatin within
polycomb complexes include X-chromosome inactivation and eukaryotic cells: (1) heterochromatin, the tightly compacted
Hox gene silencing, through modulation of chromatin structure form of chromatin that is largely transcriptionally silent; and (2)
during embryonic development.49 euchromatin, the less condensed, more transcriptionally active
According to the modern definition of epigenetics, epigenetic form of chromatin.46 However, closer inspection using new
changes must be mitotically stable. This leads to considerable molecular techniques reveals that DNA packaging also creates
controversy over the underlying changes that must be present local chromatin structures that contribute to the establishment
and as to how expression levels of consistently activated genes are of cell-type identity and lineage specificity.46,54 Briefly, each
maintained when the original activation signal has passed.46 Some chromosome folds up into a structure that promotes physical
histone modifications (e.g., H3K36 methylation) have not been connections between regulatory elements that would be
shown to be “mitotically stable” across several generations, while otherwise separated by long distances in the DNA sequence.55-60
methylation marks located on H3K4, H3K9, and H3K27 have been The organized three-dimensional (3D) chromatin structure
shown to be mitotically transmissible.50Also,some epigenetic changes within the nucleus (i.e., functional framework between
are only a transient phenomenon, such as the phosphorylation of regulatory elements and distant genes) gets substantially
a variant of histone H2A (i.e., H2AX) during DNA double-strand reorganized in disease (Fig. 2.3). This restructuring induces an
breaks.51 On many levels, this would classify as an epigenetic mark, aberrant exposure of gene promoters to inappropriate regulatory
but it disappears once the break is repaired. Thus, these types of elements, resulting in enhanced pro-disease (e.g., oncogenes)
marks will never be classified as stably inherited effects and cannot or silenced anti-disease genes (e.g., tumor suppressors). In
meet the modern definition of being epigenetic. Therefore, while development, Rubinstein syndrome and brachydactyly–mental
they are generally called epigenetic, not all methylation and histone retardation are both linked to defects in the management of
modifications are epigenetic in the modern definition.9 the local chromatin state. In Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, defects
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 23,
2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Bang vir die
lewe
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
Language: Afrikaans
deur
JAN F. E. CELLIERS
(Derde Druk.)
Die Nasionale Pers, Beperk, Drukkers en Uitgewers, Kaapstad,
Stellenbosch, Bloemfontein en Pietermaritzburg.
1925.
VOORWOORD AAN DIE LESER.
Hierdie verhaal het, as vervolgstorie, in „Die Brandwag” verskyn,
van die allereerste nommer af.
Baie boeke van die buiteland, en veral romans, behandel
toestande, persone en insigte wat vir die gewone Afrikaanse leser
vreemd en dus onverstaanbaar en ongenietbaar is. Dit kan van
hierdie boek nie gesê word nie: wat hier aan ons vertoon word, is
algemeen-menslik—sulke persone en hartstogte en gevoelens en
kontraste tref ons by ons net so aan.
Sonder dat die outeur as sedemeester optree, gaan daar ’n sterk
morele invloed van sy boek uit, deurdat hy ons op meesterlike wyse
die teëstelling laat sien tussen swakkelinge—ryk en bedorwe
sywurms wat bang is vir die lewe en stryd en strewe daarvan—en ’n
famielie van staatmakers wat sout en krag in hulself het.
Die sentrale figuur is ongetwyfeld die brawe ou moeder Kibert—vir
haar vergeet ons nooit weer nie as ons die verhaal gelees het. En
ons dink daarby aan die talryke Afrikaanse moeders en dogters wat
agtien jaar gelede op so treffende wyse aan die wêreld getoon het
hoe min hulle vir die lewe bang was—en vir die dood. Hulle rus daar
op ons velde vandag, dog die dag sal kom dat Afrikaanse skrywers
ook uit hul lewe stof sal haal vir roerende en opbouende verhale.
Dog die gewone lewe lewer daartoe al stof genoeg op; hierdie
skrywer—soos elke goeie skrywer—maak die gewone vir ons
interessant en het geen kunsies, soos intrigue en sulke goed, nodig
nie.
Hierdie verhaal is goed inmekaargesit. Die skrywer gee nie
onnodige praatjies en beskrywinge nie; ook sy natuurbeskrywinge is
net van pas op die toestande wat voorgestel word en nie
plesiertuintjies waar die outeur in verdwaal en die verband van sy
storie versteur nie.
Die Vertaler.
INHOUD.
Hoofstuk. Bls.
Deel I.
I. Terugkoms van Marcel Kibert 1
II. Broer en Suster 17
III. Die Blommefees 31
IV. ’n Agtermiddag op Chenée 39
V. Die Geheim van Alida 55
VI. Meneer en Mevrou Delourens 70
VII. Die Huweliksaanvraag 86
VIII. Planne 101
IX. Afskeid 113
X. Vertrek 121
Deel II.
I. Dertien aan Tafel 130
II. Die Boodskap van die Veldwagter 148
III. Haar Laaste Kind 154
IV. Roubeklag 162
V. Jan 173
VI. Isabella 187
VII. Die Geheim van Paula 201
VIII. Mevrou Kibert 214
IX. Haar Laaste Kind 223
X. Kalme Berusting 233
Bang vir die Lewe.
Uit die oorspronklike Frans van Henri Bordeaux na die 137e Franse
uitgaaf vir Suid-Afrika vertaal en bewerk deur Jan F. E. Celliers.
I.
TERUGKOMS VAN MARCEL KIBERT.[1]