You are on page 1of 100

Utilization of Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS)

During the limited Face To face Classes in Mariners Polytechnic

Colleges Foundation

An Undergraduate Thesis
Presented to
The Faculty of Maritime Department
MARINERS’ POLYTECHNIC COLLEGES FOUNDATION
OF LEGASPI CITY (ALBAY) INC.
Legazpi City, Albay

In Partial Fulfillment of the


Requirements for the Degree of
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MARINE TRANSPORTATION

By:

Michael M. Maquiñana

Josua Larona

Jener John Magbojos

Jethro Palermo

Stanley Morillo

JULY 2022

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Table of Contents

Chapter 1 4

The Problem and its Setting 4

Introduction 4

Statement of the Problem 8

Assumption of the study 11

Scope and Delimitation of the Study 12

Significance of the Study 12

CHAPTER II 14

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURES AND STUDIES 14

Foreign literature 14

Local Literature 18

Foreign Study 20

Local Studies 24

Synthesis of the Art 27

Gap to be Bridged by the Study 28

Theoretical Framework 28

Definition of terms 33

CHAPTER III 35

Research Design and Methodology 35

Research Design 35

Sources of data 35

Population of the Study 36

Research Instrument of the study 36

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Validation of Research Instrument 37

Data Gathering Procedures 37

Statistical Treatment of Data 38

REFERENCES 41

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 43

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Chapter 1

The Problem and its Setting

Introduction

In maritime industry, learning the course mostly rely on doing it in

laboratories by having simulation about steering, maneuvering, plotting etc.

Most subjects in the maritime course have a laboratory in it to have a first

hand experience on what is the different parts of the GMDSS and their

function and its importance to the navigation of sea

The Global Maritime Distress and Safety System is made by

Kongsberg and the immersive bridge which has a bridge space that is almost

the same as a real bridge, to provide trainees with immersive experience. The

immersive bridge includes the steering engine and electronic compass which

can be easily seen by personnel upon entering the bridge. The rudder on the

steering engine steers the course in hand or auto mode. The electronic

compass helps determine geographical position so as to decide the course.

The technical, operational, and administrative framework for maritime

distress and safety communications worldwide is known as the Global

Maritime Distress and Safety System. The International Maritime Organization

(IMO) established it in 1988 after adopting a revised version of Chapter IV of

the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS),

which deals with radiocommunications. It was implemented globally between

1992 and 1997. The GMDSS specifies the radiocommunications technology

that ships must have, how it must be maintained, how it should be utilized,

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
and it sets down the framework within which governments should set up the

proper shore-based facilities to facilitate GMDSS communications.

The Mariners Polytechnic Colleges Foundation have GMDSS

laboratories in order to fullfil the needs of the students in order for them to

learn from their career that they chosen. These laboratories are the computer

laboratory, GMDSS laboratory, Global Maritime Distress and Safety with

Kongsberg simulator, and seamanship laboratory.

Last December 13, 2019 the WHO released the memorandum on the

spread of pneumonia cases of unknown cause in Wuhan City, China. A novel

coronavirus was identified as the cause by Chinese authorities on 7 January

2020 and was temporarily named “2019-nCoV” and later on it came to the

Philippines in January 30, 2020. By the arrival of the novel coronavirus the

health security standards of the country has been heightened in order to fight

for the disease causing virus. But having these strict guidelines doesnt help to

stop the spread of the virus and continues to widen its range. On December

2020 the cases recorded that had positive in covid virus is 467,601. By having

this high cases many sectors are affected to this issue including the schools

and the education of the students.

The spread of virus, made the CHED formulates the new way of

learning modality which is the online learning where the lectures are to be

done online while the laboratories are postponed by that time where the covid

is spreading fast to the country. While the virus is around, the students were

restricted to leave their homes unless needed. Postponing the laboratory in

the verge of the covid virus is considered as a good move i for the safety of

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
the students . Many educators were forced to translate courses that were

based on face-to-face or practical goals and conventions into ones that could

be delivered online as a result of the radical global shift to online teaching and

learning that resulted from the lockdown rules and regulations of the COVID-

19 pandemic (henceforth, pandemic) in the spring of 2020. (Gewin, 2020)

By the time passes by, the The COVID-19 vaccines are discovered for

their role in preventing or reducing the cases and death caused by COVID-19.

By having the vaccine many countries have distribution plans that prioritize

those at highest risk of complications, such as the elderly, and those at high

risk of exposure and transmission, such as healthcare workers.

As of 26 May 2022, 11.81 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines have

been administered worldwide based on official reports from national public

health agencies.By December 2020, more than 10 billion vaccine doses had

been preordered by countries, with about half of the doses purchased by high-

income countries comprising 14% of the world's population. Despite the

extremely rapid development of effective mRNA and viral vector vaccines,

worldwide vaccine equity has not been achieved. The development and use

of whole inactivated virus (WIV) and protein-based vaccines has also been

recommended, especially for use in developing countries.

The cases lowered as the time goes by, CHED made a memorandum

on the limited face to face classes for all programs of higher education

institutions under alert level system for the response of the covid-19. CHED

said in the memorandum that in the places under alert level 1, 2 and 3 are

now allowed to take the limited face to face for the students to attend their

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
important classes like the laboratories especially the maritime students who

rely mainly on equipments of the ships to learn thoroughly.

With the discovery of the vaccine, the cases of the virus lowered and

slowed down that makes the country health safety let loose in some places ,

although there are some places still imposing the strict compliance of the

health protocol because of high cases of COVID transmission there are also

places who were already permitted to slowly hold the Limited Face to Face

classes due to low cases of COVID spread. . Permission is granted to

schools to operate but advies to follow the basic health protocols and

proper hygiene for the safety of the community. The method of learning in

school is still limited to online learning of Academic subjects while laboratory

classes are scheduled for a Face to Face meetings Currently, in Mariners

Polytechnic Colleges Foundation the only limited face to face classes are the

subjects that have laboratories because this is very needed in learning for the

students especially in the maritime course.

Learning about the course is very helpful in every career. They do

many methods in order to learn something in order for us to really understand

what is our career all about like having a lecture, watching videos, and having

a laboratory.

The reason why the researchers are conducting this research on how

the students utilized the laboratory especially the FMB simulator in this time

where they are now conducting limited face to face classes for the laboratory.

Also the researchers want to know how affects the competitiveness of the

students if they do face to face laboratory other than online learning.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Learning is a very important tool in honing the students skills to use in

the future but learning without having the experience to do so is a very hard

task because its very different from what it is in the books or lecture that the

instrucor said. That,s why a laboratory is made in order for us to apply the

things we learn in school Laboratories in school is a type of a room where it is

different from the room that we used to discuss. Here in the laboratory the

maritime students can do the actual process of manipulating and managing

the laboratory equipment in every particular maritime subjects in this manner

the students will understand the theories discussed in the classroom.

In order for the students to learn well the CHED made a memorandum

04 series of 2020 for all programs including the maritime students to be able

for them to learn both on face to face and online learning settings or in other

words flexible learning. This memorandum is made to give ways to learn and

teach for both students and teachers. By having the online learning the

students dont have to worry being late at school or waking up early in the

morning only going to school.

According to Father Leblond School, School labs are a great place for

students which help them enhance their learning by understanding the

theoretical concepts of science which are taught in classrooms. Well-designed

laboratories not only make experiments fun but also help students in

achieving good academic results.(Leblond, 2019) without this laboratories,

the students learning will become unripe and not well refined whenever they

encounter it personally.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
The International Maritime Organization which were adopted by the

maritime states in 1988, led to the development of the Global Maritime

Distress and Safety System (GMDSS). The goal of GMDSS is to virtually

guarantee that complying vessels will be able to communicate with an

onshore station at any time, from any location, in case of distress or to

exchange information. GMDSS is based on recent developments in maritime

communications, such as satellites and digital technology, and is designed to

ensure maximum availability of safety-related communication for all

passenger ships as well as for cargo vessels of 300 GT and upward engaged

in international voyages.

The schedule of GMDSS laboratories of Mariners Polytechnic Colleges

Foundation of Legazpi for the Limited Face to Face is once a week every

friday, this is to follow the health protocols provided by the government and

also to avoid further exposure to the virus. Students can learn about all topics

covered by the GMDSS syllabus in this lab by using both a theoretical and

practical approach. In marine areas, you will have access to every piece of

equipment needed for the Global Maritime Distress & Safety System. In

this lab, students will learn about radio telephony voice processes, radio

response and SOLAS rules, digital selective calling (DSC), and how to use

and maintain all required maritime radio equipment.

Statement of the Problem

The present study aimed to determine the satisfaction Utilization of Global

Maritime Distress and Safety System of third-year BSMT students in the Basic

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Training course offered in MPCF- LC. Specifically, it sought answers to the

following questions:

1. What is the nature of the utilization of GMDSS laboratory during the

limited face to face classes along the following terms.

a. Rate of Utilization

b. Time of utilization

c. Schedule of Utilization

d. Number of instructors assigned in the GMDSS Laboratory

2. What are the problems encountered in the utilization of GMDSS

Laboratory along the following terms;

a. Schedule of classes

b. Physical set-up

c. Laboratory Activities

d. Faculty Incharge

3. What recommendation could be suggested to answer the problems

encountered along the following terms,

a. schedule of Classes

b. Physical set-up

c Laboratory Activites

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
d. Faculty Incharge

Assumption of the study

The study is based on the following assumptions:

1. The nature of the utilization of GMDSS laboratory during the limited

face to face classes along the following terms Rate of utilization, Time of

Utilization, Schedule of Utilization, Number of instructors assigned in the

GMDSS Laboratory may vary.

2. . The problems encountered in the utilization of GMDSS laboratory

along the following terms Schedule of classes, Physical set-up, Laboratory

Activities, Faculty Incharge may vary.

3. The recommendation could be suggested to answer the problems

encountered along the following terms schedule of classes, Physical set-up,

Laboratory Activities, Faculty Incharge may vary.

Scope and Delimitation of the Study

This study will focus on the utilization of Global Maritime Distress and

Safety System during the limited face to face classes in Mariners Polytechnic

Colleges Foundation specifically to the 3rd year Marine Transportation

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
students. The participants of the study will be the 3rd year BSMT students

coming from 5 sections. This study will only include those who are attending

the LF2F laboratory classes of Global Maritime Distress and Safety System

during the limited face to face classes in Mariners Polytechnic Colleges

Foundation.

The delimitation of this study are the Marine engineering students of

Mariners Polytechnic Colleges Foundation and other Marine Transportation

students not using the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System during the

limited face to face classes.

Significance of the Study

The result of the study, on the “The utilization of GMDSS laboratory during the

limited face to face classes in MPCF-LC ” will provide benefits to the following:

Maritime students. They can benefit from this study because of the

data provided for them, The utilization of the GMDSS laboratory during the

limited face to face classes in MPCF-LC will help them to understand the

adjustment implemented in the use of the laboratory.

Laboratory instructor. This research can serve as additional

information for the instructors on how to improve the instruction and

management of the laboratory pertaining to the utilization of the laboratory .

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Maritime department. The research will provide information that can

be used to improve the laboratory which is vital to the learning of the maritime

students.

MPCF-LC. The study can provide information that can help the

institution evaluate the effectiveness of the conduct of LF2F classes in the

GMDSS laboratory.

Researchers. The research will provide information, reference, and

assistance in their study on the utilization of GMDSS laboratory during the

Limited Face 2 Face Classes.

Future Researchers. This study will serve as additional information

when they will conduct future researches along similar topic.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURES AND STUDIES


`

This chapter presents the literature and studies, which are related to

the present study. The local and foreign studies are taken from magazines,

books, web sources and thesis with relation to this research. This chapter also

include the synthesis of the art, gap bridged by the study and the discussion

of theoretical and conceptual frameworks and the definition of terms.

Foreign literature
The GMDSS laboratory is one of the important laboratory in the

Maritime department of MPCF-LC since it is a major equipment needed to

develop the skill of the Mariime students. The laboratory is located in every

school. The value of a laboratory in the classroom can be derived from real-

life learning experiences in a variety of subjects. As a result, laboratory plays

a key role in allowing students to try new things while using the existing

resources. The real-life experience in the laboratory will assist students in

learning more effectively and remembering information for a longer period of

time. The combination of laboratory and classroom experiences distinguishes

our school from others (Anonymous, 2022).

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Education has numerous shortcomings, ranging from goods in poor

condition to school textbooks overflowing with materials that are frequently

unnecessarily convoluted, riddled with errors, and difficult to comprehend by

many students. Another significant issue is the lack of facilities and equipment

that aid in making the learning process as understandable as feasible. (Jëlliqi

N. , 2019). A school with poor laboratory facilities is difficult for the students

because their learning will be limited especially if the subject to be taken

needs actual operation. The BSMT course is hard for the students if they

only rely on the lessons and videos that we only see on the screen we also

need to apply our knowledge in real time event that the laboratory can

provide.It is very important to have a GMDSS laboratory in schools as well as

its utilization just like what is being implemented by MPCF-LC to all its

Maritime students.

The importance of laboratories to students' studies is discussed in an

essay by Clara Viegas and 10 other authors. They also discuss how some

laboratories, such as remote labs, can have varying effects on the courses

you take depending on whether they are effective or not. The satisfaction level

of the students with having these types of laboratories in their field of study is

demonstrated in this study. Because it is not appropriate for their selected

course and it is challenging for them to apply their learning if they do it

remotely, some students are not satisfied and do not use the remote

laboratories that the school implemented very well. This information is

pertinent to our study in terms of how laboratories are used and the

effectiveness of using different approaches, such as remote and face-to-face,

in laboratories. 2018 (C. Viegas et al). (C. Viegas et al.). This literature applies

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
to respondents because they use the laboratory in remote face-to-face

settings.

Having the virus is very hard for the students to learn especially if it is

needed to learn in actual way. In a review paper made by the author Kelum A.

A. Gamage et al. He said that the higher level of education is much more

affected in the transmission of the COVID-19 virus that all universities

suspend their face to face academic classes and instead of having face to

face activities, they stay for now in having a alternative way of teaching for the

students to learn whenever there is a pandemic. Laboratory classes are

conducted in real laboratory sets in the majority of the experiments, which

would not be practicable during a pandemic like COVID-19. When students

are not physically present on campus, virtual labs, remote control labs, or

video based labs are good options. Simulation technologies and virtual reality

are utilized in virtual labs. Distant laboratories allow students to conduct

experiments through the internet, whereas video-based activities provide a

step-by-step description of a real lab so that students may visually see the

entire experimental procedure and its environment. (Gamage, K.A.A.;

Wijesuriya, D.I.et al 2020)

This situation is also being experienced by the Maritime students of

MPCF-LC who are also trying their best to attend the LF2F classes just to

develop their skills on the operation of the GMDSS laboratory amidst the

difficulty they are facing during this pandemic.

There is a very big difference in using the GMDSS when it comes to

distance learning vs the face to face classes. At the peak of the COVID-19

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
pandemic, UNESCO estimates that 91.3% of the world’s students were

learning remotely, with 194 governments ordering country-wide closures of

their schools and more than 1.3 billion students learning in online classrooms.

Now that the building blocks of remote education have been put into place

and classroom learning is underway, more and more teachers are turning

their attention to the mental health of their students. Youth anxiety about the

coronavirus is rising, and our young people are feeling isolated, disconnected,

and confused. While social-emotional education has typically taken place in

the bricks and mortar of schools, we must now adapt these curriculums for an

online setting. Governments around the world have decided to close

educational institutions. According to UNESCO, 188 countries have canceled

schools nationwide. This affected 91.3% of students worldwide (1.58 billion

people). In some countries, schools are closed at the local or regional level.

The only solution in this situation is remote learning. Currently, 53 states have

deployed national educational platforms.For example, the Chinese

government provides support to digitalize educational materials.The South

Korean government has announced measures to support digital education.

The new school year in the country will begin as online classes on April 9.

(The first semester of a school year in Korean schools usually begins on

March 1 and lasts until mid-July.). How COVID-19 changes education: global

problems and other countries experience. Anonymous, 2020.

The MPCF-LC Maritime department had undergone an extensive

preparation in order that the LF2F classes to all the Maritime laboratory

subjects could be undertaken this 2nd semester of the s/y 2021-2022. Strict

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
compliance of the health protocol was given enough consideration so that

claboratory classes could be conducted safely .

Local Literature

By having the limited face to face, it is very easy for us students to go

to the school and conduct our laboratories. The school heads and the

teachers are now ready in progression for the expansion of the limited face to

face classes. Health protocols and standards are being observed to the hilt.

The good thing about the expanded in-person classes is only schools located

in areas under Alert Levels 1 and 2 have been allowed as assessed

periodically by the Department of Health.(Education stakeholders welcome

expanded limited face-to-face classes, 2022). As time passes by, the virus

covid-19 now weakens and the government issued permits for schools to

other operate on limited face to face especially those where laboratory

activities are important. This is applicable to some courses where learning

virtually is very hard as on the part of the Maritime students in MPCF-LC that

need hands-on training in laboratory subjects. The knowledge of operating

the GMDSS laboratory is an important skill to be developed to Maritime

students.

After missing out on face-to-face classes and meeting new friends for

more than a year due to the pandemic, learners once again get to cherish the

joys of going to school (Montemayor, 2021). By opening the classes almost all

facilities of the school are now opened and it is still limited people to go to

school because its to early to celebrate to have face to face classes

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
considering the virus is still around and not completely annihilated as of now.

Montemayor, (2021),

To ensure that students are safe or at least lessen the impacts of

COVID-19, the MPCF-LC Maritime department implement health measures

in conducting face-to-face classes which was properly planned according to

national and international criteria. After all, education is important to

students& lives. It is the obligation of every government to see that this is

done.

Face-to-face learning is superior to online learning because ;in-person

communications make our brains happier; according to Stanford researchers.

In a classroom setting, teachers can better manage their topics because they

are no longer compressed to fit the modules. Going to class with a real

teacher is more engaging for students than reading a stack of modules. In a

classroom atmosphere, students can grow and feel more comfortable

engaging with and learning from one another. Businessmirror,( 2022)

Many parents appeared to breathe a sigh of relief as face-to-face (f2f)

lessons gradually resumed. Students from kindergarten to college have to

learn online or in a modular format for more than two years. The Department

of Education (DepEd) and the Commission on Higher Education (Ched)

enacted this to protect students&; health during the Covid-19

outbreak.The school and its pupils had no choice but to follow the instructions

to prevent the spread of Covid-19 during the peak of the pandemic. While

online learning has some advantages, it simply cannot replace the face-to-

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
face or in-person learning experience. Students and teachers can

communicate more effectively in person classes. Anonymous n.d.

Foreign Study

According to a study by (R. Eitutis, 2020), simulators for ships have

become widely used during the past few decades. Training and education in

maritime matters. Students studying at the bridge and in the engine room can

improve their knowledge and competency by using simulators. Students will

become familiar with and learn about the equipment utilized onboard in the

maritime section of the MPCF. They will boost a student's abilities,

knowledge, and experience.

The phrase has typically been restricted to the technological

components of simulator training, with the assumption that a high level of

authenticity correlates to a high physical similarity between a simulator and

the real-world workplace. This is according to Aud M. Wahl (2019). The

results demonstrate the potential influence of task parameters, trainer trainee

relationships, and simulator technology on perceived faithfulness and training

quality. A series of recommendations for future marine simulator-based

training design are included in the study's conclusion. In the labs, instruction

in cutting-edge computer technology and group projects are enhanced,

guiding MPCFLC's BSMT students.

Students are much more comfortable using the Laboratory in the way

of face to face but needs more time for their laboratory to broaden their

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
knowledge and be satisfied for their knowledge that they get inside the

laboratory; According to Caiga, Maristela, Moredo et al. (2015) determine the

level of Satisfaction of Maritime students in using Laboratory Facilities and the

problems encountered with regards to service provided by laboratory facilities.

Descriptive type of research was employed in the study. Results showed that

the students are satisfied in using each laboratory facility provided by the

school administration while the time intended for the use of each laboratory

facility does not satisfy the students. The students encounter difficulty on how

to operate equipment especially the equipment of GMDSS laboratory. The

students are not aware about the fire fighting and first aid equipment beside

the point that this is important in emergency purposes.

According to Hensen (1999), the out of window view through electronic

screens is critical for adequate training and realistic performance on ship

bridge simulators, particularly navigation and maneuvering in confined waters.

Because masters and pilots rely on their own visual observation to make

judgments, they base rudder, engine, and tug motions in great part on visual

data, such as the ship's speed, drift, direction, rate of turn, and distances

gained from the outside world. Because this information is so important to the

watch officer, it should be provided directly on the simulator. The most

significant parts of the out of the window view must be validated for more

information.2019; Hvold et al. 2015). In MPCF maritime department every

students must have an adequate training and familiarization on the

equipments used in the GMDSS Laboratory. Students utilizing the

laboratories in MPCF can have a higher competitiveness and understanding

when it conducts in limited face to face classes.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Apparently, C. Sellberg (2017) The current systematic literature review

uncovered 34 articles from a range of academic journals, illustrating a broad

field of study that covers three main disciplines: education (n = 6), human

factors (n = 13), and marine professionals (n = 15). Because MET institutions

prepare students for one of the most safety-critical industries in the world,

empirical studies on these subjects are required to improve the quality of

training and assessment and lay the foundation for an evidence-based

approach for simulation-based seafarer training. As a result, simulator-based

maritime training appears to be a small and diverse field of study, with many

studies (n = 13) lacking empirical data as a foundation for analysis.

Local Studies
According toMaristela (2015) examined the degree to which maritime

students were satisfied with the services offered by laboratory facilities as well

as the issues they ran into. The study used a descriptive type of investigation.

The results showed that despite the time set aside for using each laboratory

facility does not satisfy the students, the students are satisfied while using the

facilities that are supplied by the school administration. The students had

trouble using the equipment, particularly the GMDSS laboratory equipment.

According to Rolando A., engineering teaching labs. Education can

enhance instructional quality and student happiness, and laboratories are

essential to successful teaching, according to Alimen and Edsel S. Gildore

(2020). Teaching laboratories are thought of as unique learning environments

that support inquiry-based learning. Students' learning is connected to their

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
level of satisfaction. In this situation, learning involves performing laboratory

exercises and troubleshooting. Better learning happens in a better

environment. The laboratory is therefore essential to students' learning and

enjoyment. It is not reasonable to assume that students are happy at their

educational institutions. Regarding the use of the laboratory. The engineering

teaching labs, It relates to the study because like those in the BSMT course,

they improve the teaching, and student pleasure is directly related to their

learning because they will be relying on their own visual observation to form

opinions.

According to Paraggue et al. (2017) Continuous monitoring and

evaluation are required to keep graduates abreast of marine trends and

expectations in order to avoid falling behind in a highly competitive industry

like shipping. The study assessed the PMMA cadets' academic preparation

and shipboard training performance as a foundation for improving the

program's customer satisfaction. The descriptive design was used to collect

and assess the respondents' opinions. The curriculum, staff expertise, and

laboratory and equipment were all assessed as extremely excellent by the

trainees. The trainees' work competency, ethical standards, and knowledge

and skills were all regarded as highly satisfactory by evaluator-respondents.

Report writing was rated favorably by trainees. They also performed the jobs

and functions listed in their training logbook, however there were several

areas where the majority of them had no expertise. In MPCF maritime

department every students must monitor and evaluate to reduce the

possibility to fail and fall behind in the world of highly competitive industry. The

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
students of MPCFLC must have competency, ethical standards, and

knowledge and skills to get reach the high expectation from them.

According to Aydogdu (2022) Bridge simulators are critical and

compulsory training tools for Maritime Education and Training (MET)

Institutions to meet the Standards of Certification, Training, and Watchkeeping

for Seafarers (STCW) Convention. According to STCW Convention Code Part

B, other usages of simulator applications are strongly recommended. In order

to build the most realistic schemes, simulators should also account for the

psychological surroundings that trainers experience. In MPCFLC the

simulation exercises provide the proper use of resources by enabling the

determination and the elimination of problematic issues leading to failure,

optimizing system performance, carrying out modifications, and even

rebuilding the system if necessary.

According to Rooij and Van (1992), reproduction is a simple

progression of marine handling, route and radar, balance/load, impetus, or

other ship framework fusing an interface material for creative use by the

applicant or student either outside or inside the working encompassing and

agreeing to models of execution. 36 Maritime simulators are a stage or device

that simulates the tasks that will be performed aboard cargo ships and in

operational drills. It relates to our study because of the Marine simulators

provide realistic activity training, detailed environmental effects, and the

delivery of many blames in a framework that ensures instruction using group

methodology and graphics for greater authenticity.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Synthesis of the Art

The cited researcher in this chapter presented the challenges of virtual

learning especially for courses that require hands-on laboratories like Global

Maritime Distress and Safety System. Furthermore, the studies show that

effective and efficient laboratory equipment and facilities are important for a

student to achieve an in-depth understanding of the course. The study used a

descriptive type of investigation. The results showed that despite the time set

aside for using each laboratory. And also, Training and education in maritime

matters. And Marine simulators provide realistic activity training, detailed

environmental effects, and the delivery of many blames in a framework They

also performed the jobs and functions listed in their training logbook, however

there were several areas where the majority of them had no expertise.

Students are much more comfortable using the Laboratory in the way of face

to face but needs more time for their laboratory. The researchers also

emphasized the effects of remote learning and laboratories and how it

provides lesser satisfaction and learning to the students

Gap to be Bridged by the Study

The studies presented in this chapter mainly focused on the

importance of laboratories and simulators in the learning process of students.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
It was found out that not one among the studies cited conducted a study

about the utilization of GMDSS in Mariners Polytechnic Colleges Foundation

in Legazpi City . To bridge the gap between the cited studies, this research

aims to present the effectiveness of the GMDSS a specific training simulator

for maritime courses of MPCF-LC.

Theoretical Framework

During the conduct of the study, two theorists along with their theoris

were used. These are the Community of Inquiry by Garrison et al. (2000) and

CABLES Framework by Wang et al. (2015).This theory presented by Garrison

shows that the framework describes learning as the convergence of three

“presences” – cognitive presence, teaching presence, and social presence –

all of which, again, interact with each other to set an appropriate climate and

regulate learning as well as supporting discourse between learners and

teachers.

CABLES approach by Wang et al. (2015) systems approach enables

someone new to blended learning to take major interacting components into

account when they design and provide a course or program for blended

learning. The connection between curriculum, learners, and technology will

pique teachers' interests the most.

Presented as a process, the theoretical framework shows three boxes with

the corresponding arrows showing the next step. The box on top consists of

the problem of the study which is directed to the next one containing the

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
theories applied to supplement the study then leads to the results gathered

implementing the theories applied. The theories chosen and used during the

conduct of this study will prove to be beneficial to the participants, the readers

and the school as it can be used as a related study to further future research

Theoretical Framework

CABLES Framework Community of Inquiry

Wang et al. (2015) Garrison et al. (2000)

Utilization of Global Maritime Distress

and Safety System During the limited


.
Face To face Classes in Mariners

Polytechnic Colleges Foundation

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Explain that learning is a direct

result of human behaviour which

is influenced by the environment

and the individual thinking

process of learners.

2. Understand that experience

gives the person a maturity and

increases the learning power

along with the knowledge.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

In this study, a conceptual paradigm acts as a guide for pursuing

answers to the primary problem as well as specific subproblems. Aspects

deemed vital to develop the research and further the findings are organized

into four boxes. The first box is the core problem of the study, around which

the entire investigation revolves, is included within the first box. The use of a

Global Maritime Distress and Safety System during the limited face-to-face

classes is described.

The second box is mainly composed of Self-experiences, observations,

interview from classmates and other maritime students. This is to get ideas to

what possible solutions and measure we can use in this research. And in the

third box are the projected outcomes of educating all maritime students about

the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System. This mostly focuses on the

lessons that can be learned from the experiences and how they may be

utilized as practical knowledge to help students understand things better.

The final box contains the research feedback, which will be used to

decide whether the objectives were met. This can be used to evaluate specific

things that could be improved.

The results were taken into consideration and utilized as one method of

examining the BSMT students of MPCF Legazpi, which may be used as a

guide to help enhance awareness of the course and profession. Other issues

that arise as a result of this research can be identified and explored as a new

body of knowledge.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Socio demographic
profile of the
respondents, factors
considered in the
utilization of the
GMDSS Laboratory in
the conduct of Limited
Face to Face classes, Awareness of all
Utilization of Maritime maritime students
problems encountered
Distress and Safety about the Global
by the respondents in
System during the Maritime Distress and
the utilization of the
limited face to face Safety System.
GMDSS in conduct of
classes
Limited Face to face
classes,
recommendations
could be suggested to
improve to the
utilization of the
GMDSS in conduct of
Limited Face to Face

FEEDBACK

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Definition of terms

To provide the readers with better understanding,the following terms were

conceptually and operationally defined:

Faculty in charge- Refers to a teacher who has been designated to provide

supervision, leadership, and oversight of the class.( Webster Dictionary ).The

Instructor incharge is the one who gives information about the GMDSS to the

students of MPCFLC.

Global Maritime Distress and safety system- is an automated ship to shore

system using satellites and digital selective calling technology. It is used to

navigate to have safe navigation at sea. (https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/bureau-

divisions/mobility-division).The Global Maritime Distress and Safety system

provide the experience and knowledge to the maritime students when it

comes on preventing unanswered distress call and delay in search and

rescue actions when distress situations occur.

Physical Setup- The assembly and arrangement of the tools and apparatus

required for the performance of an operation (Merriam-Webster).The

preparation of the needed equipment and facilities. Provides the satisfaction

and fulfillment to them.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Rate of the utilization- a quantity, amount, or degree of something measured

per unit of something else(Merriam-Webster).It shows how effective the

utilization is.

Utilization- To make use of. (Merriam-Webster ). To make it useful and

effective.

CHAPTER III

Research Design and Methodology

This chapter presents the methodology and procedure used in the

study. It includes the sources of data, population of the study, the research

instrument, data gathering procedure, the statistical tools that used in the

data presentation and analysis.

Research Design

The descriptive quantitative survey method is the type of research

methodology that have been employed in the study. Using Google Forms, the

researcher would distribute the survey questionnaire to the respondents in

order to collect data from a large number of respondents using this manner.

The descriptive approach would be employed since it is the most practical

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
and trustworthy way to get the required data from the respondents.( DISCUSS

THE APPROACH VERY WELL - SE THE MODULE )

Sources of data

The study would utilize two sources of data: the primary and the

secondary. The primary sources of data would came from the respondents

who would provide the answers to the survey questionnaire. The secondary

sources of data would came from the internet other online references

including , journals, textbooks, various websites and web pages.

Population of the Study

The population of the study would only include Section’s 3A1, 3A2,

3A3, 3A4, and 3A5 with a total of 40 students of 3nd Year BS Marine

Transportation of MPCFLC. The population of the study is shown in Table A.

TABLE A

Population of the Study

Respondents Population Percentage Sample Size

MT-3A1 39 20% 8

MT-3A2 41 20% 8

MT-3A3 42 20% 8

MT-3A4 35 20% 7

MT-3A5 42 20% 8

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
TOTAL 204 100% 40

Research Instrument of the study

The main instrument that would be used in gathering the data needed

in the study is a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire has four (4)

parts. The first part will present the Socio demographic profile of the

respondents; the second part are the factors considered in the utilization of

GMDSS laboratory; the third part are the problems encountered by the

respondents in the utilization of the GMDSS laboratory, and the last part are

series of recommendations that could help improve the utilization of GMDSS

Laboratory The researchers have distributed the survey questionnaire

through google form that would automatically show the data that would be

collected.

Validation of Research Instrument

The survey questionnaire would be checked by the research instructor

and adviser , other maritime instructors would also be requested by the

researchers to check the survey instrument. Pre-testing and dry run would be

done after the checking of the questionnaire. The survey questionnaire would

be administered to ten (10) selected validators composed of 3rd year BSMT

students who already used the GMDSS laboratory equipment. The validation

would check the validity and correctness of the questions. The corrections

and suggestions that have been gathered in the validation will be adjusted to

the research instrument.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Data Gathering Procedures

The study have been conducted during the 1st semester of the school

year 2022- 2023 by the researchers in Mariners Polytechnic Colleges

Foundation Legaspi. The subjects have been included in this research will

the 2nd year BSMT students that used the GMDSS during the limited face to

face classes.

The survey questionnaire have been distributed to the respondents

through google form. Upon the collection of the needed data analysis,

discussion and presentation will immediately follow.

Statistical Treatment of Data

The researchers would use frequency count and percentage to analyze

and interpret the data gathered. The frequency count and the percentage

have been used to describe the profile of the respondents.

x
P= x 100
N

Where:

P = Percentage

X = Frequency

N = no. of population

100 = constant

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
The weighted mean could be used to interpret the factors considered

in the utilization of the GMDSS laboratory during the limited face to face

classes of the 2nd year BSMT students of MPCF-LC, the problems

encountered in the utilization of the GMDSS and the recommendations to

answer the problems encountered in the utilization of the GMDSS.

∑ FX
WM=
N

Where:

f = frequency of the respondents

x = no. of respondents

N = population

∑ fx = the sum of the product of f and x

WM = average weighted mean

The numerical ratings under part 2 and 3 will be translated into adjectival

ratings using the 4 -Point the Likert Scale which are as follows:

Numerical rating Adjectival rating Adjectival rating Adjectival rating


(Part 2) (Part 3) (Part 4)

3.26 - 4.00 Strongly Agree Strongly Strongly


Encountered Recommended

2.51 - 3.25 Agree Encountered Recommended

1.76 - 2.50 Moderately Agree Moderately Moderately Agree


Encountered

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
1.0 - 1.75 Disagree Not Encountered Not Recommended

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents the discussion on the findings, analysis and implication

of the gathered data along with Utilization of Global Maritime Distress and

Safety System During the limited Face To face Classes in Mariners

Polytechnic Colleges Foundation. The discussion followed the sequence as

indicated in the presentation of the specific problems stated in the first

chapter.

1. Profile of Respondents of Bachelor of Science in Marine

Transportation from MPCF-LC

This section presents the Findings and its frequency and percentage about

the profile of the respondents of Bachelor of Science in Marine Transportation

from MPCF-LC. The Data presented in terms of Four (4) Areas namely: Time

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
of using GMDSS Laboratory, Schedule of using GMDSS Laboratory, Length

of time of using GMDSS Laboratory, and Number of Instructors Assigned.

Table I. Profile of Respondents of Bachelor of Science in Marine

Transportation from MPCF-LC

Time of using GMDSS Frequenc Percentag

Laboratory y e

Morning 27 65.9%

Afternoon 14 34.1%

Schedule of Using GMDSS Frequenc Percentag

Laboratory y e

Once a week 34 82.9%

Twice a week 7 17.1%

Thrice a week 0 0%

Everyday 0 0%

Length of time using GMDSS Frequenc Percentag

Laboratory y e

1 hour 23 56.1%

2 hours 13 31.7%

3 hours 4 9.8%

4 hours 1 2.4%

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Frequenc Percentag

No. of instructors assigned in GMDSS y e

Laboratory

1 instructor 34 82.9%

2 instructors 7 17.1%

3 instructors 0 0%

A. Time of using GMDSS Laboratory

The data in table 1 shows the distribution of time where the respondents use

GMDSS Laboratory. The findings revealed that 65.9% of students of MPCF-

LC is using the GMDSS Laboratory in the morning while the 34.1% of

students is using GMDSS Laboratory in afternoon.

B. Schedule of Using GMDSS Laboratory

According to the result of the survey, the schedule of 2 nd year BSMT students

of MPCF-LC is mostly once a week with a frequency of 34 responses and the

percentage of 82.9% while 7 respondents have schedule of twice a week and

with a percentage of 17.1%. The schedule of GMDSS Laboratory the highest

mean recorded was the schedule of once a week this means that the 2nd yr

students mostly choose the schedule of GMDSS Laboratory once a week with

a respondents of 34 students the lowest mean recorded was thrice a day and

everyday schedule of GMDSS Laboratory the students don't choose the

everyday and thrice a week schedule.

C. Length of time using GMDSS Laboratory

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
From the result of the questionnaire, 56.1% with a frequency of (23) is using

the laboratory for one hour on the other hand, 31.7% of respondents has a

length of 2 hours when they are using the GMDSS Laboratory. The 9.8% of

respondents of questionnaire has taken 3 hours of using the GMDSS

Laboratory and 2.4% with a frequency of (1) is using the GMDSS Laboratory

for 4 hours. This implies that most of the respondenyd have used the GMDSS

Laboratory for at least 1 hour.

D. No. of instructors assigned in GMDSS Laboratory

The last part is the number of assigned instructors. The highest recorded

mean was 82.9 which is the only one instructor the students see that one

instructor at a time is just good enough while the lowest is question 3 which is

having 3 instructors.

2.Problems encountered in utilizing the GMDSS Laboratory

This section presents the findings and its corresponding analysis and

interpretation about the Problems encountered in utilizing the GMDSS

Laboratory. The Data presented in terms of the Seven (7) Areas namely:

Facility, Ventilation, Laboratory Equipment, Physical Set-up, Laboratory

Activities, Faculty in charge, and Schedule of classes. Also presented in this

portion are the respective frequency count and percentage of the

Encountered problems along the mentioned areas.

Table II. Problems encountered in using GMDSS Laboratory

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Problems Statements Mea Interpretation

Facility Overcrowded Laboratories 2.02 Moderately

encountered

Lack of rooms for students 2.41 Moderately

encountered

Unsanitized Laboratory Rooms 1.78 Moderately

encountered

General Weighted Mean 2.07 Moderately

encountered

Ventilation Aircon/fan is not working 2 Moderately

properly encountered

Insufficient amount of aircon or 2 Moderately

electric fans encountered

The Laboratory room is too hot 2.09 Moderately

or cold encountered

General Weighted Mean 2.03 Moderately

encountered

Equipment Insufficient number of equipment 2 Moderately

encountered

Different models of equipment 1.68 Not

encountered

Equipment is not functioning 2.41 Moderately

encountered

Students dont know how to 2.44 Moderately

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
operate equipment encountered

General Weighted Mean 2.13 Moderately

encountered

Physical Some area of laboratory are 2.07 Moderately

Set-up hard to access encountered

The room is not well maintained 1.68 Not

encountered

The room do not provide enough 1.95 Moderately

mobility for the students encountered

General Weighted Mean 1.9 Moderately

encountered

Laboratory Lab Activities are too hard 2.09 Moderately

Activities and to complete encountered

The instructions in Activities are 1.9 Moderately

not well explained encountered

Some activities are not related 1.63 Not

to the subject being undertaken encountered

It takes more than one day to 1.95 Moderately

complete the task encountered

The instructor left the school and 1.75 Moderately

the students are left behind in encountered

lecture

General Weighted Mean 1.86 Moderately

encountered

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Faculty in The instructor is absent 1.92 Moderately

Charge frequently encountered

The teacher didn’t explain well 1.8 Moderately

the lessons/ activities encountered

The instructor is late in schedule 1.68 Not

encountered

The instructor don’t want to 1.78 Moderately

teach the students encountered

General Weighted Mean 1.79 Moderately

encountered

Schedule of Tight Schedule 1.95 Moderately

Classes encountered

Long Schedule 2 Moderately

encountered

Schedule too short 2.04 Moderately

encountered

General Weighted Mean 1.99 Moderately

encountered

A. Facility

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents slightly

experienced having overcrowded classrooms, lack of rooms for students and

unsanitized laboratory rooms with an interpretation of Moderately

Encountered and a weighted mean of 2.02, 2.41, and 1.78 respectively. This

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
implies that they only experience a slight of inconvenience when using the

facility of GMDSS Laboratory

This study aimed to determine the level of Satisfaction of Maritime students in

using Facilities and the problems encountered with regards to service

provided by facilities. Descriptive type of research was employed in the study.

Results showed that the students are satisfied in using each laboratory facility

provided by the school administration

B. Ventilation

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “Aircon/fan is not working properly” with an interpretation of

Moderately Encountered and with a weighted mean of 2, followed by the

“Insufficient amount of aircon or electric fans” with an interpretation of

Moderately Encountered and with a weighted mean of 2, furthermore the”

Laboratory room is too hot or cold” with an interpretation of Moderately

Encountered and with a weighted mean of 2.09 and the General Weighted

Mean is 2.03 and the interpretation of Moderately Encountered. This implies

that they only experience a slight of inconvenience when using the facility of

GMDSS Laboratory

Ventilation rates often do not meet building standards, although it is

considered to be important to improve indoor air quality. Poor indoor air

quality is thought to influence both students health and performance.

C. Equipment

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “Insufficient number of equipment” with an interpretation of

Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 2, however, the “Different

models of equipment” with an interpretation of Not encountered with a

weighted mean of 1.68, additionally the “students don't know how to operate

equipment” with an interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted

mean of 2.44 and the General Weighted Mean is 2.44 and the interpretation

of Moderately Encountered. This implies that they only experience a slight of

inconvenience when using the facility of GMDSS Laboratory

The equipment of Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS),

under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). This

equipment includes numerous devices of different technologies, features and

user interfaces, which every officer of the watch (OOW) must know how to

use.

D. Physical Set-up

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “Some area of laboratory are hard to access” with an

interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 2.07.

Followed by the “room is not well maintained” with an interpretation of Not

Encountered and a weighted mean of 1.68. Lastly is the “room do not provide

enough mobility for the students” with an interpretation of Moderately

encountered and a weighted mean of 1.95 and the General Weighted Mean is

1.9 and the interpretation of Moderately Encountered. This implies that they

only experience a slight of inconvenience when using the facility of GMDSS

Laboratory

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the existing

model of teaching physical training in schools and the analysis of a game like

method introduced to improve physical fitness of students.

E. Laboratory Activities

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “Laboratory Activities are too hard and to complete” with an

interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 2.09

followed by the ‘instructions in Activities are not well explained” with an

interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 1.9

However, the, “some activities are not related to the subject being

undertaken” with an interpretation of Not encountered and a weighted mean

of 1.63 in addition to that the “It takes more than one day to complete the

task” with an interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean

of 1.95 and the last one is the “instructor left the school and the students are

left behind in lecture” with an interpretation of Moderately encountered and a

weighted mean of 1.75 and the General Weighted Mean is 1.86 and the

interpretation of Moderately Encountered. This implies that they only

experience a slight of inconvenience when using the facility of GMDSS

Laboratory

The laboratory is an essential element in the teaching and learning of

chemistry, but it is challenging to provide this when delivering courses and

programs online or at a distance. Studies have repeatedly shown that

alternate laboratory modes can lead to equivalent student performance when

compared with in-person experiences. In this literature review, we will

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
examine five modes of laboratory delivery (i.e., face-to-face, virtual, remote

control, home-study kits and, to a lesser extent, self-guided field trips) that

may be considered in providing quality practical laboratory activities to support

online studies.

F. Faculty in charge

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “instructor is absent frequently” with an interpretation of

Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 1.92 followed by “The

teacher didn’t explain well the lessons/ activities” with an interpretation of

Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 1.8, however the “instructor

is late in schedule” with an interpretation of Not encountered and a weighted

mean 1.68. Lastly “The instructor don’t want to teach the students” with an

interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 1.78 and

the General Weighted Mean is 1.79 This implies that they only experience a

slight of inconvenience when using the facility of GMDSS Laboratory.

The roles and responsibilities of college and university faculty members are

closely tied to the central functions of higher education. One primary formal

description of these functions was contained in the 1915 "Declaration of

Principles" formulated by a representative committee of faculty members

including members of the American Association of University Professors

(AAUP). According to the Declaration, the functions of colleges and

universities are "to promote inquiry and advance the sum of human

knowledge, to provide general instruction to the students, and to develop

experts for various branches of the public service.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
G. Schedule of Classes

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “Tight Schedule” with an interpretation of Moderately

encountered and a weighted mean of 1.95 on addition the “Long Schedule”

with an interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 2.

However the “Schedule too short” with an interpretation of Moderately

encountered and a weighted mean of 2.04 and the General Weighted Mean

is 1.99. This implies that they only experience a slight of inconvenience when

using the facility of GMDSS Laboratory.

class schedule refers to the classes a student will take in a particular

school or college program. Students and teachers are given these schedules

at the start of each term. The schedule may be changed later on if the student

withdraws from a course or adds a new course. Generally, the information is

provided in an online format. Each schedule will generally include details like

the course name, number of credits, building name, room number, course

number, days, time and instructor’s name. In addition, it will detail any labs or

lectures that must also be attended as a part of the course.

3.Recommendations could be suggested to improve the utilization of the

GMDSS

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
This section presents the findings and its corresponding analysis and

interpretation about the recommendations could be suggested to improve

the utilization of the GMDSS in the conduct of the LF2F classes. The

Data presented in terms of the Seven (7) Areas namely: Facility, Ventilation,

Physical Set-up, Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Activities, Faculty In

charge, and Schedule of Classes. Also presented in this portion are the

respective frequency count and percentage of the Encountered problems

along the mentioned areas.

Table III. Recommendations could be suggested to improve the

utilization of the GMDSS in the conduct of the LF2F classes

Recommendation Statements Mea Interpretation

s n

Facility The lab room must limit to set 2.73 Recommende

number of student d

The room must be sufficient 2.78 Recommende

to every students d

The room must be sanitized 2.68 Recommende

very well d

General Weighted Mean 2.73 Recommende

Ventilation The aircon/ fan must be 3.02 Recommende

functioning well d

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
The aircons must have 2.97 Recommende

sufficient number for every d

laboratory

The temperature of lab room 2.9 Recommende

must be well maintained d

General Weighted Mean 2.96 Recommende

Physical Set-Up The room must be easy to 2.95 Recommende

access or enter d

The room must be cleaned 2.87 Recommende

and organized very well d

The set up must have 2.75 Recommende

sufficient space for students d

and not too tight that affect

the students learning

General Weighted Mean 2.85 Recommende

Laboratory Laboratory activities must be 3.09 Recommende

Activities simple but engaging d

Activities must elaborated 3.04 Recommende

well d

Activities must be related to 3.04 Recommende

the topic d

Activities must take one day 2.92 Recommende

to complete d

Students must have other 3.09 Recommende

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
sources to be able to learn d

how to use equipments.

General Weighted Mean 3.03 Recommende

Faculty in Charge Faculty must interact with 3.09 Recommende

students d

Instructor must be on time in 3.04 Recommende

schedule d

Instructor must explain the 3.12 Recommende

topic very well d

The instructor that is leaving 3.09 Recommende

must replace immediately to d

avoid delaying the learning of

students

General Weighted Mean 3.08 Recommende

Schedule of Avoiding conflicts of schedule 3.24 Recommende

Classes d

The schedule for classes 3.07 Recommende

must be enough for students d

to learn

The schedule for classes 3.07 Recommende

must not be too early in the d

morning or too late in the

evening

General Weighted Mean 3.13 Recommende

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
d

A. Facility

Based on the results of the data gathered, the room must be sufficient to very

students got the highest mean of 2.78 which is interpreted as recommended

then, the lab room must limit to set number of students has a 2.73 weighted

mean interpreted as recommended and the room mist be sanitized very well

has a weighted mean of 2.68 interpreted as recommended.

From the result of the data, the general weighted mean for the facility is 2.73,

interpreted as recommended.

This survey attempted to find out how satisfied maritime students were with

using the lab facilities and what issues they had with the service those

facilities provide. The study used a descriptive type of investigation. The

results showed that despite the time set aside for using each laboratory facility

does not satisfy the students, the students are satisfied while using the

facilities that are supplied by the school administration.

B. Ventilation

Based on the results of the data gathered, the aircon/fan must be functioning

well has the highest weighted mean of 3.02 interpreted as recommended,

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
followed by the aircons must have sufficient number for every laboratory has a

weighted mean of 2.97 interpreted as recommended.

From the result of the data, the general weighted mean for the ventilation is

2.96, interpreted as recommended.

The review shows that ventilation has various positive impacts on health and

productivity of building occupants. Ventilation reduces the prevalence of

airborne infectious diseases and thus the number of sick leave days.

C. Physical Set-up

Based on the results of the data gathered, the room must be easy to access

or enter got the highest weighted mean of 2.95 interpreted as recommended

then, the room must be cleaned and organized very well has a weighted

mean of 2.87 interpreted as recommended and the set up must have

sufficient space for students and not too tight that affect the students learning

has a weighted mean of 2.75 interpreted as recommended.

The data shows that in physical set-up, the general weighted mean is 2.75,

which means that the students recommended that the room are must be

organized, clean, easy to access and must have sufficient space.

Sufficient space or facilities (e.g., storage cabinets with partitions) shall be

provided so that incompatible chemicals/gases (waste and non-waste) can be

physically separated and stored. This will be based on the chemical inventory

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
and use projection provided by the Principal Investigator to the project and

EH&S. If the project scope cannot provide sufficient storage the user must

develop a written management control plan to include as part of their local

Chemical Hygiene Plan

D. Laboratory Activites

Based on the results of the data gathered, the students must have other

sources to be able to learn how to use equipments and laboratory activities

must be simple but engaging got the same highest weighted mean of 3.09

interpreted as recommended then, the Activities must elaborated well and

Activities must be related to the topic has the same weighted mean of 3.04

interpreted as recommended, Activities must take one day to complete has a

weighted mean of 2.92 interpreted as recommended.

From the result of the data, the general weighted mean for the laboratory

activities is 3.03, interpreted as recommended.

The science learning goals of laboratory experiences include enhancing

mastery of science subject matter, developing scientific reasoning abilities,

increasing understanding of the complexity and ambiguity of empirical work,

developing practical skills, increasing understanding of the nature of science,

cultivating interest in science and science learning, and improving teamwork

abilities.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
E. Faculty In Charge

Based on the result of the data gathered, Instructor must explain the topic

very well got the highest weighted mean of 3.12 interpreted as recommended

then, the instructor that is leaving must replace immediately to avoid delaying

the learning of students and Faculty must interact with students has the same

weighted mean of 3.09 interpreted as recommended, the Instructor must be

on time in schedule has the weighted mean of 3.04 interpreted as

recommended.

From the result of the data, the general weighted mean for the faculty in

charge is 3.08, interpreted as recommended.

A Principal Investigator (PI) has the overall responsibility for compliance with

the Chemical Hygiene Plan in his or her laboratory. This responsibility may

not be shifted to inexperienced or untrained personnel. In addition, research

sponsors such as NIH expect grantees to meet applicable Federal, State, and

local health and safety standards and implement the necessary measures to

minimize their employees' risk of injury or illness.

F. Schedule of Classes

Based on the result of the data gathered, Avoiding conflicts of schedule got

the highest weighted mean of 3.24 interpreted as recommended then, The

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
schedule for classes must be enough for students to learn and the schedule

for classes must not be too early in the morning or too late in the evening has

the same weighted mean of 3.07 interpreted as recommended.

From the result of the data, the general weighted mean for the schedule of

classes is 3.13, interpreted as recommended.

This paper examines the relationship between course scheduling and student

achievement, controlling for student and course characteristics. The literature

in psychology recognizes that performance varies by time of day and that

spacing learning out over time may foster greater long-term memory of items.

We use student grades as a measure of performance and find a small,

positive time of day effect partly driven by student selection into preferred

course times. In addition, we find that students earn higher grades in classes

that meet more often.

CHAPTER 5

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
This Chapter presents the general summary of the study. The summary of

findings, the conclusions, and recommendations. Some areas are covered for

further studies and reference for future researchers.

Summary

The study was conducted among selected BSMT Third Year of MPCF-

LC in Albay in order to determine the utilization of Global Maritime Distress

and Safety System. This study is a quantitative type of research using an

google form. The survey questionnaires were handed to the respondents

through Facebook Messenger due to the current situation during the conduct

of the study. The interpretation of the results made from the study is base

from the yield of the distributed survey.

Specifically, the study sought to answer the following questions:

1. What is the nature of the utilization of GMDSS laboratory during the limited

face to face classes along the following terms.

a. Rate of Utilization

b. Time of utilization

c. Schedule of Utilization

d. Number of instructors assigned in the GMDSS Laboratory

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
2. What are the problems encountered in the utilization of GMDSS Laboratory

along the following terms;

a. Schedule of classes

b. Physical set-up

c. Laboratory Activities

Faculty Incharge

3. What recommendation could be suggested to answer the problems

encountered along the following terms,

a. schedule of Classes

b. Physical set-up

c. Laboratory Activites

d. Faculty Incharge

Findings

The following are the findings of the study.

1.Profile of Respondents of Bachelor of Science in Marine

Transportation from MPCF-LC

a. Time of using GMDSS Laboratory

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
The findings revealed that 65.9% of students of MPCF-LC is using the

GMDSS Laboratory in the morning while the 34.1% of students is using

GMDSS Laboratory in afternoon. This shows that most of the students is

using the GMDSS laboratory in the morning.

b. Schedule of Using GMDSS Laboratory

According to the result of the survey, the schedule of 2 nd year BSMT

students of MPCF-LC is mostly once a week with a frequency of 34

responses and the percentage of 82.9% while 7 respondents have schedule

of twice a week and with a percentage of 17.1%. This implies that students

most usually have once a week in using the GMDSS laboratory.

c. Length of time using GMDSS Laboratory

Fifty six percent of BSMT students is using the laboratory for one hour

while about thirty two percent of BSMT students has a length of 2 hours when

they are using the GMDSS Laboratory and about ten percent of BSMT

stundents has taken 3 hours of using the GMDSS Laboratory. Three percent

of students is using the GMDSS Laboratory for 4 hours. This data implies that

using the GMDSS usually only take one hour to conduct laboratory activities.

d. No. of instructors assigned in GMDSS Laboratory

The last part is the number of assigned instructors. The highest

recorded mean was 82.9 which is the only one instructor the students see that

one instructor at a time is just good enough while the lowest is question 3

which is having 3 instructors. This shows that the one instructor is assigned in

using the laboratory.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
2. Problems encountered in utilizing the GMDSS Laboratory

a. Facility

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents slightly

experienced having overcrowded classrooms, lack of rooms for

students and

unsanitized laboratory rooms with an interpretation of Moderately

Encountered and a weighted mean of 2.02, 2.41, and 1.78 respectively. This

implies that they only experience a slight of inconvenience when using the

facility of GMDSS Laboratory.

b. Ventilation

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “Aircon/fan is not working properly” with an

interpretation of Moderately Encountered and with a weighted mean of 2,

followed by the “Insufficient amount of aircon or electric fans” with an

interpretation of Moderately Encountered and with a weighted mean of 2,

furthermore the” Laboratory room is too hot or cold” with an interpretation of

Moderately Encountered and with a weighted mean of 2.09 and the General

Weighted Mean is 2.03 and the interpretation of Moderately Encountered.

This implies that they only experience a slight of inconvenience when using

the facility of GMDSS Laboratory.

c. Equipment

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “Insufficient number of equipment” with an interpretation of

Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 2, however, the “Different

models of equipment” with an interpretation of Not encountered with a

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
weighted mean of 1.68, additionally the “students don't know how to

operate equipment” with an interpretation of Moderately encountered and a

weighted mean of 2.44 and the General Weighted Mean is 2.44 and the

interpretation of Moderately Encountered. This implies that they only

experience a slight of inconvenience when using the facility of GMDSS

Laboratory

d. Physical Set-up

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents experienced the

“Some area of laboratory are hard to access” with an interpretation of

Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 2.07. Followed by the “room

is not well maintained” with an interpretation of Not Encountered and a

weighted mean of 1.68. Lastly is the “room do not provide enough mobility for

the students” with an interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted

mean of 1.95 and the General Weighted Mean is 1.9 and the interpretation of

Moderately Encountered. This implies that some of the laboratory areas are

very hard to reach or to enter.

e. Laboratory Activities

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “Laboratory Activities are too hard and to complete” with an

interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 2.09

followed by the ‘instructions in Activities are not well explained” with an

interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 1.9

However, the, “some activities are not related to the subject being

undertaken” with an interpretation of Not encountered and a weighted mean

of 1.63 in addition to that the “It takes more than one day to complete the

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
task” with an interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean

of 1.95 and the last one is the “instructor left the school and the students are

left behind in lecture” with an interpretation of Moderately encountered and a

weighted mean of 1.75 and the General Weighted Mean is 1.86 and the

interpretation of Moderately Encountered. This implies that the students have

some hard time in the laboratory activities.

f. Faculty in charge

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “instructor is absent frequently” with an interpretation of

Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 1.92 followed by “The

teacher didn’t explain well the lessons/ activities” with an interpretation of

Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 1.8, however the “instructor

is late in schedule” with an interpretation of Not encountered and a weighted

mean 1.68. Lastly “The instructor don’t want to teach the students” with an

interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 1.78 and

the General Weighted Mean is 1.79. This implies that the students slightly

have problems in the faculty in charge.

g. Schedule of Classes

Based on the results of the data gathered, the respondents

experienced the “Tight Schedule” with an interpretation of Moderately

encountered and a weighted mean of 1.95 on addition the “Long Schedule”

with an interpretation of Moderately encountered and a weighted mean of 2.

However the “Schedule too short” with an interpretation of Moderately

encountered and a weighted mean of 2.04 and the General Weighted Mean is

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
1.9. The data shows that the students want more schedules for their

laboratory classes.

3. Recommendations could be suggested to improve the utilization of

the GMDSS

a. Facility

Based on the results of the data gathered, the room must be sufficient

to very students got the highest mean of 2.78 which is interpreted as

recommended then, the lab room must limit to set number of students has a

2.73 weighted mean interpreted as recommended and the room mist be

sanitized very well has a weighted mean of 2.68 interpreted as recommended.

This data implies that they want the more laboratory rooms for the students to

enter.

b. Ventilation

Based on the results of the data gathered, the aircon/fan must be

functioning well has the highest weighted mean of 3.02 interpreted as

recommended, followed by the aircons must have sufficient number for every

laboratory has a weighted mean of 2.97 interpreted as recommended. The

data shows that the students want a well functioning aircon or fan.

c. Physical Set-up

Based on the results of the data gathered, the room must be easy to

access or enter got the highest weighted mean of 2.95 interpreted as

recommended then, the room must be cleaned and organized very well has a

weighted mean of 2.87 interpreted as recommended and the set up must

have sufficient space for students and not too tight that affect the students

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
learning has a weighted mean of 2.75 interpreted as recommended. This data

implies that the GMDSS laboratory must have a convenient place to enter or

exit.

d.Laboratory Activites

Based on the results of the data gathered, the students must have

other sources to be able to learn how to use equipments and laboratory

activities must be simple but engaging got the same highest weighted mean

of 3.09 interpreted as recommended then, the Activities must elaborated well

and Activities must be related to the topic has the same weighted mean of

3.04 interpreted as recommended, Activities must take one day to complete

has a weighted mean of 2.92 interpreted as recommended. This data shows

that the students want the laboratory activities to be simple but fun.

e. Faculty In Charge

Based on the result of the data gathered, Instructor must explain the

topic very well got the highest weighted mean of 3.12 interpreted as

recommended then, the instructor that is leaving must replace immediately to

avoid delaying the learning of students and Faculty must interact with

students has the same weighted mean of 3.09 interpreted as recommended,

the Instructor must be on time in schedule has the weighted mean of 3.04

interpreted as recommended. This implies that the students want a more

fulfilling lesson from their instructors by explaining the topic very well.

f. Schedule of Classes

Based on the result of the data gathered, Avoiding conflicts of schedule

got the highest weighted mean of 3.24 interpreted as recommended then, The

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
schedule for classes must be enough for students to learn and the schedule

for classes must not be too early in the morning or too late in the evening has

the same weighted mean of 3.07 interpreted as recommended. This data

shows that the students want the schedule for their limited face to face have

no conflict to other subjects they are taking.

Conclusions

The study has the following conclusions:

1. The profile of the utilization of Global Maritime Distress and Safety System

(GMDSS) varied in terms of type of rate of utilization, time of utilization,

schedule of utilization, and number of instructors assigned in the GMDSS

Laboratory

2. The status of utilization of Global Maritime Distress and Safety System

terms of schedule of classes, physical set-up, laboratory activities and faculty

incharge

3. The problems are being encountered in the untilization of Global Maritime

Distress and Safety System in terms of schedule of classes, physical set-up,

laboratory activities and faculty incharge.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
4. The respondents agreed on the possible solution that may be offered to

solve the problems encountered in terms of schedule of classes, physical set-

up, laboratory activities and faculty incharge.

Recommendations

Recommendations could be suggested to improve the utilization of the

GMDSS This section presents the findings and its corresponding analysis

and interpretation about the recommendations could be suggested to improve

the utilization of the GMDSS in the conduct of the LF2F classes. The Data

presented in terms of the Seven (7) Areas namely: Facility, Ventilation,

Physical Set-up, Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Activities, Faculty In

charge, and Schedule of Classes. Also presented in this portion are the

respective frequency count and percentage of the Encountered problems

along the mentioned areas.

1. The facilities must be regularly inspected to maintain the equipments for

the students to have quality laboratory activities.

2. The activities must be easily to understand to make it easily to answer.

3. The schedule of the class must not be too Early so that students can catch

up on there classes.

4. the facility must have a good circulation of the air coming from outside.

5. The setup of the facility must be visible.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
6.The faculty in charge must have clear instructions for students to

understand clearly.

Areas for Further study

The satisfactory of using Global Maritime Distress and Safety System

During the limited face to face classes in Mariner's Polytechnic colleges

foundation.

During the limited face to face offered by Mariner's Polytechnic

Colleges foundation, students learned how to use the Global Maritime

Distress and Safety System.

Safety and Utilization Control Management in the Maritime Industry

Amidst of the Limited Face to Face Classes in Mariners Polytechnic

Colleges Foundation

REFERENCES

R. Eitutis, 2020 " The Use of a Global Maritime Distress and Safety System
Ensuring Navigational Safety during the Klaipeda Seaport Development "
https://www.transnav.eu/
Article_The_Use_of_a_Full_Mission_Bridge_Simulator_Ensuring_Navigationa
l_Safety_during_the_Klaipeda_Seaport_Development_Sencila,54,1019.html

Aud M. Wahl (2019) " the use of technology and collaborative activities in
training maritime officers "

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10111-019-00549-4?fbclid=IwAR1Q-
J-JzNV4ySNXCgeat0E8F0gLa0uKY2qoZMgw8Ibcxo3n97XgRxc7-9A

Caiga, Maristela, Moredo et al. (2015) " Satisfaction of Maritime Students in


using Laboratory Facilities "
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Satisfaction-of-Maritime-Students-in-
using-Caiga-Maristela/fccff7561df269d154e9d1e66c74c0d8ac2e8ce3

Hensen (1999) " The importance of using ship bridge simulation training to
enhance the competency of masters and watch-officers : a case study of the
iraqi dredging fleet "
https://commons.wmu.se/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1081&context=all_dissertations

Sellberg (2017) " Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a


systematic review and qualitative synthesis "
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13437-016-0114-8

Maristela (2015) “ Satisfaction of Maritime Students in using Laboratory


Facilities “
http://research.lpubatangas.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/APJME-
2015-005-Maristela-LEVEL-OF-SATISFACTION-OF-LIMA-STUDENTS-IN-
USING-LABORATORY-FACILITIES.pdf

Den Blink (2009) " Satisfaction of Maritime Students in using Laboratory


Facilities "
http://research.lpubatangas.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/APJME-
2015-005-Maristela-LEVEL-OF-SATISFACTION-OF-LIMA-STUDENTS-IN-
USING-LABORATORY-FACILITIES.pdf

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Rolando A. Alimen, and Edsel S. Gildore (2020) " Laboratory-Services
Leading to Quality of Maritime Education and Training (MET) at Maritime
University in Philippines "
https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/
6001132f17d70.pdf

Aydogdu (2022) " Utilization of Full-Mission Ship-Handling Simulators for


Navigational Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Large Vessel Passage
through the Istanbul Strait "
file:///C:/Users/DEFAULT.DESKTOP-41PDA0U/Downloads/jmse-10-
00659.pdf

Rooij and Van (1992) " EFFECTIVENESS OF SEAFARERS TRAINING


USING MARITIME SIMULATORS "
file:///C:/Users/DEFAULT.DESKTOP-41PDA0U/Downloads/
EFFECTIVENESSOFSEAFARERSTRAININGSANGEETHA.pdf

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
APPENDICES

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
APPENDIX A

LETTER TO THE RESPONDENTS

MARINER’S POLYTECHNIC COLLEGES FOUNDATION OF LEGAZPI CITY

(ALBAY) INC. Legazpi City, Albay

Dear Respondents,

We the researchers are conducting the survey for our study entitled
“Utilization of Global Maritime Distress and Safety System During the limited
Face To face Classes“ as one of the academic requirements of Bachelor of
Science in Marine Transportation.

The researchers respectfully ask for your cooperation in this particular


research project by providing accurate and thorough answers to the given
questionnaire. We much appreciate any information you share, and we can
assure you that it will be kept private.

Thank you.

Respectfully yours,

Researchers,

MAGBOJOS, JENER JOHN C.

MAQUINANA, MICHAEL M.

PALERMO, MIKO JETHRO N.

MORILLO, STANLEY D.

LARONA, JOSUA A.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
APPENDIX B

“Utilization of Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS)

During the limited Face To face Classes in Mariners Polytechnic

Colleges Foundation”

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Name:

I.INSTRUCTION: Please indicate your answer on the corresponding questions

Profile of Respondents of Bachelor of Science in Marine Transportation


from MPCF-LC

A. Time of using GMDSS Laboratory

[ ] Morning

[ ] Afternoon

B. Schedule of using GMDSS Laboratory

[ ] Once a week

[ ] Twice a week

[ ] Thrice a week

[ ] Everyday

C. Length of Time using the GMDSS Laboratory

[ ] 1 hour

[ ] 2 hours

[ ] 3 hours

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
[ ] 4 hours

D. No. of instructors assigned in GMDSS Laboratory

[ ] 1 instructor

[ ] 2 instructors

[ ] 3 instructors

II. INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate your answer by putting a check (✔) on the
corresponding column. Refer to the scale below.

4 - Strongly Agree

3 - Agree

2 - Moderately Disagree

1 - Disagree

Problems encountered in utilizing the GMDSS Laboratory?

Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly


Disagree Agree

Facility

4. Overcrowding Laboratories
5. Lack of rooms for students

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
6. Unsanitized Laboratory
rooms

Ventilation

1. Aircon/fan is not working


properly
2. Insufficient amount of aircon
or electric fans
3. The Laboratory room is too
hot or cold

Laboratory Equipment

1. Insufficient number of
equipment
2. Different models of
equipment
3. Equipment is not functioning
4. Students dont know how to
operate equipment

Physical Set-up

1.Some area of laboratory are hard


to access

2. The room is not well maintained

3.The room do not provide enough


mobility for the students

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Laboratory Activities Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly
Disagree Agree

1. Lab Activities are too hard

and to complete

2. The instructions in Activities


are not well explained

3. Some activities are not


related to the subject being
undertaken

4. It takes more than one day to

complete the task

Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly


Disagree Agree

Faculty in charge

1.The instructor is absent frequently


2. The teacher didn't explain well

the lessons/ activities

3. The instructor is late in schedule

4.The instructor don’t want to teach

the students

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
5.The instructor left the school and

the students are left behind in

lecture

Schedule of classes Disagree Moderatel Agree Strongly


y disagree agree

1.Tight Schedule

2.Long Schedule

3.Too short

What recommendations could be suggested to improve the utilization of

the GMDSS in the conduct of the LF2F classes along the following

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Facility Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly
Disagree Agree

1.The lab room must


limit to set number of
student

2. The room must be


sufficient to every
students

3. The room must be


sanitized very well

Ventilation Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly


Disagree Agree

1.The aircon/ fan must


be functioning well

2. The aircons must


have sufficient number
for every laboratory

3. The temperature of
lab room must be well
maintained

Physical Set-up Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly


Disagree Agree

1.The room must be


easy to access or enter

2. The room must be


cleaned and organized
very well

3.The set up must have


sufficient space for
students and not too
tight that affect the
students learning

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Laboratory Equipment Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly
Disagree Agree

1.Must have a sufficient


equipment for every
students.

2. The models of
equipment must not
different from other
equipment

3. The equipment must


be always maintained
and functioning

4. Equipments must
have a manual for each
of them

5.Students must have


other sources to be able
to learn

Laboratory activities Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly


Disagree Agree

1.Laboratory activities
must be simple but
engaging

2.Activities must
elaborated well

3.Activities must be
related to the topic

4.Activities must take


one day to complete

Faculty in Charge Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly


Disagree Agree

1.Faculty must interact


with students
2. Instructor must be on
time

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
3. Instructor must
explain the topic very
well
4. The instructor that is
leaving must replace
immediately to avoid
delaying the learning of
students

Schedule of Classes Disagree Moderately Agree Strongly


Disagree Agree

1.Avoiding conflicts of
schedule

2.The schedule for


classes must be enough
for students to learn

3.The schedule for


classes must not be too
early in the morning or
too late in the evening

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
We are submitting the revised copy of Chapters 1-3 and Survey

Questionnaire based on the comments and suggestions of the panel during

the proposal defense. Please affix your signatures after checking the

manuscript as requirement of Res. 2 Pre-Lim Period. Thank you.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
APPENDIX C

DOCUMENTATION

Screenshot of the summary of the response of the BSMT 3 rd Year

students on Google Form.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
CURRICULUM VITAE

JENER JOHN C. MAGBOJOS

Brgy. Bagumbayan, Masbate City

0969-246-9103

jjmagbojos@marinerslegazpi.edu.ph

PERSONAL BACKGROUND

Date of Birth : 08 / 08 / 02

Age : 20

Sex : Male

Civil Status : Single

Height : 168 cm

Weight : 65 kg

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Tertiary : Mariner’s Polytechnic Colleges

Foundation Legazpi City, Albay

Secondary

Senior High : Masbate National Comprehensive High

School

Junior High : Masbate National Comprehensive High

School

Primary : Yadah Christian School INC.

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
CURRICULUM VITAE

MICHAEL M. MAQUINANA

Lubiano, Pilar, Sorsogon

0907-010-6032

mmaquinana@marinerslegazpi.edu.ph

PERSONAL BACKGROUND

Date of Birth : 03 / 11 / 02

Age : 20

Sex : Male

Civil Status : Single

Height : 171 cm

Weight : 55 kg

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
CURRICULUM VITAE

MIKO JETHRO N. PALERMO

Santiago Iriga City

0945-812-8017

mjpalermo@marinerslegazpi.edu.ph

PERSONAL BACKGROUND

Date of Birth : 05 / 04 / 01

Age : 21

Sex : Male

Civil Status : Single

Height : 172 cm

Weight : 57 kg

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Protestant

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Tertiary : Mariner’s Polytechnic Colleges

Foundation Legazpi City, Albay

Secondary

Senior High : Santiago Integrated School

Junior High : ACLC COLLEGE OF IRIGA

Primary : Santiago Integrated School

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
CURRICULUM VITAE

JOSUA A. LARONA

Sogoy Castilla Sorsogon

0977-146-7025

jlarona@marinerslegazpi.edu.ph

PERSONAL BACKGROUND

Date of Birth : 07/07/02

Age : 20

Sex : Male

Civil Status : Single

Height : 177 cm

Weight : 53 kg

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Tertiary : Mariner’s Polytechnic Colleges

Foundation Legazpi City, Albay

Secondary

Senior High : Bicol College

Junior High : Holy Family Academy

Primary : Sogoy Elementary School

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
CURRICULUM VITAE

STANLEY D. MORILLO

NABUA CAMARINES SUR

0927-209-5524

smorillo@marinerslegazpi.edu.ph

PERSONAL BACKGROUND

Date of Birth : 07 / 20 / 00

Age : 22

Sex : Male

Civil Status : Single

Height : 168 cm

Weight : 60 kg

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
Tertiary : Mariner’s Polytechnic Colleges

Foundation Legazpi City, Albay

Secondary

Senior High : UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY

Junior High : LA CONSOLACION IRIGA CITY

Primary : HOLY CROSS PAROCHIAL SCHOOL

PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1

You might also like