Professional Documents
Culture Documents
African Politics
and Ethics
Exploring New Dimensions
Munyaradzi Felix Murove
Religion, Philosophy, and Classics
University of KwaZulu-Natal
Scottsville, South Africa
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the
publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect
to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Acknowledgements
v
Contents
1 Introduction 1
Index167
vii
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Why write about African politics and ethics? From colonialism to post-
colonialism, politics has remained the primary causal factor for all that has
gone wrong in our current post-colonial societies in sub-Saharan Africa.
Most of the social ills such as corruption, poverty, economic underdevel-
opment, poor governance and civil wars are prominent African problems
that have their genealogy in politics. From colonialism to post-colonialism,
the continent has been in a state of perennial crisis. For reasons that have
remained unknown, so little has been written on politics and ethics in
post-colonial Africa even though politics has been the number one factor
in the ruining of people’s lives. Whilst Africa has been described as rich in
terms of moral values, the political terrain remains characterized by moral
barrenness. Though scholars from various disciplines have proffered dif-
ferent solutions to Africa’s political problems, none of those solutions
seem to have worked. An academic once remarked that the problem of
Africa is that those who are in political power in Africa are usually unedu-
cated or poorly educated whist those who are educated do not have politi-
cal power. This remark is quite incisive because political power has been
the preserve of the poorly educated rather than the well-educated. But
again, this claim cannot be sustained because the educated political leaders
in Africa have behaved in a way that has caused untold human suffering.
The political field does not have a culture of professionalism because poli-
tics in the African context shares a lot of similarities with the culture of
urban gangsterism.
are physically and mentally incapacitated to deal effectually with their exis-
tential problems. The dominant organized religions such Islam and
Christianity have failed spectacularly to provide society with strong moral
leadership.
Because of political and economic crises that have besieged sub-Saharan
Africa, many people have fallen prey to the new form of power which is
being paraded by charismatic founders of new African Pentecostal
Christianity. Leaders of these new churches are currently inundated by fol-
lowers because of their claims to divine power of healing most of those
dreaded diseases that are currently incurable as well as their power to
bestow material prosperity to the economically wretched African majority.
These Pentecostal leaders have become extremely powerful and rich such
that their followers and politicians alike can do almost anything for them.
Sometimes these new African Pentecostal leaders have pronounced proph-
esies on the social media concerning the futures of African political leaders
and the fortunes of the nation. Though their prophecies have not always
materialized, their followers do believe in these prophesies unquestion-
ingly. A common motif in the prophetic messages of African Pentecostal
leaders is usually about the direct involvement of God in the political
affairs of the country, and that whatever is happening is part and parcel of
God’s grand plan. Pentecostal leaders are not so much concerned with
ethics or morality. Their main interest is power. In this regard, their char-
ismatic religious activities have not helped to bring about social, religious
and economic transformation. The mushrooming of Pentecostal churches
in Africa brings into focus the importance of ethics because some of these
religions are unethical religions.
African ethics as captured in traditional African humanism has been
integral to the political discourses of post-colonial nationalists such as
Kwame Nkrumah, Leopold Senghor, Julius Nyerere, Kenneth Kaunda
and Seko Toure. The writings of these fathers of African nationalism
exudes some passion for the inclusion of traditional African humanistic
values in their efforts towards the reconstruction of the post-colonial eco-
nomic and political life. In the light of the writings of these African nation-
alists, the popular claim that ethics and politics are incompatible cannot be
sustained with impunity. For example, though Nkrumah and Nyerere’s
were highly sensitized to the ethic of the common good, with ethically
good intentions they ended up impoverishing their societies. The colonial
experiences of subjugation and dehumanization sharpened their moral
imaginations in the reconstruction of their post-colonial societies. Politics
4 M. F. MUROVE
ethical resources for African politics. With this aim in mind, the book will
unfold as follows: Besides this first chapter, which is an introductory chap-
ter to the book, the second chapter will introduce the reader to the main
characteristics of African ethics with the aim of mentally preparing him or
her to some of the African political issues and their relationship to African
ethics. The third chapter is a discussion of African traditional religion and
the influence it had on politics prior to the advent of colonialism. In the
fourth chapter I will look into the issue of the controversy of African tradi-
tions and politics and how African traditional values have been the basis of
the political behaviour in African societies. Are values of traditional societ-
ies applicable to our contemporary African political context? In the fifth
chapter I discuss the issue of the predominance that is usually given to
tradition as a prerequisite to an authentic African identity. The sixth chap-
ter looks critically into the ethical debate of African humanism and its
symbiotic relationship to the post-colonial socio-economic ethic of col-
lectivism as an attempt constructing a poverty alleviation policy. The sixth
chapter will go on to show how the post-colonial attempt at poverty alle-
viation has been integral African political efforts at pursuing regional inte-
gration through an ethic co-operation has been integral to post-colonial
political efforts aimed at overcoming the scourge of poverty. Finally, the
seventh chapter selects three leaders—Nkrumah, Nyerere and Mandela—
and discusses how African traditional values had shaped their visions of
ethical leadership.
Bibliography
Senghor, L.S. 1968. On African Socialism. London: Macmillan.
Tambulasi, R., and Kayuni, H. 2009. Ubuntu and Democratic Good Governance
in Malawi: A Case Study. In African Ethics: An Anthology of Comparative
and Applied Ethics, ed. M.F. Murove, 427–440. Scottsville: University of
KwaZulu-Natal Press.
CHAPTER 2
Africa is immensely rich with moral values and ethical traditions, which to
a great extent have not been investigated adequately by scholars. What has
remained as the main preoccupation of academics in post-colonial Africa is
the usual tendency of thinking and writing predominantly about ethics in
terms of the Western ethical traditions such as utilitarianism and the
Kantian deontological ethics. This scholarly tendency has consequently
failed to take into account the contribution of African ethical traditions in
the day-to-day reflections of African socio-economic, political, psycho-
logical and religious realities. Sometimes an uncompromising commit-
ment to the hegemony of Western ethical values manifests itself through
condemnation of traditional African values as barbaric, pagan, animistic
and uncivilized. In most cases the condemnation and critique of African
ethics is usually done from a very superficial perspective masquerading as
genuine African scholarship. In this regard, the salient presumption is that
African ethics could only be authentic if it is commensurate with the
Western philosophical and religious ethical modes of thought. In the
scope of this chapter, my main aim is not to investigate the merits and
demerits of the above pessimistic scholarly outlook towards African ethics,
but to discuss the main characteristics of African ethics succinctly in a way
that will later on demonstrate to the reader how African ethics has been
theoretically integral to post-colonial political discourses. For conceptual
clarity purposes, I have divided this chapter into three themes that tend to
survived death and to be living in a spiritual world, but still taking a lively
interest in the affairs of their families”. In other words ancestors are inti-
mately connected to their families and are interested in the day-to-day
affairs of their families. Because of this intimate relationship between
ancestors and their families, Africans believe that their ancestors “are not
far away”, and hence “they are believed to be watching over their families
like a ‘cloud of witnesses’.” Whatever is the issue of concern within the
family such as “health and fertility” are considered to be of great interest
to the ancestors because “they are its elders and will also seek rebirth into
the same family”. Ancestors are supposed to be consulted when it comes
to issues of land, its fertility and the general material wellbeing of the fam-
ily. The consultation of ancestors on such issues is based on the belief that
they are still member of the family even though they have been buried into
the earth. What remained in the earth and decomposed in it was their
material bodies but their spirits survived death.
The African belief in ancestors is based on the idea that life is endless.
For this reason, the world of mortality is inextricably linked to the world
of immortality. Ancestors are regarded as those members of the commu-
nity who existed in the past and after transiting into the world of immor-
tality through a process of death, they live a life closely linked to that of
God. They are regarded as having departed physically but always being
present in spiritual form. Ancestors are concerned with what goes on in
the communities where they once lived during their lives of mortality
materially, morally and spiritually. It is mainly for this reason that ancestors
are thus regarded as custodians of the traditions of the community. In
Chap. 3 we shall see how this African belief in ancestors as custodians of
the traditions of the community has influenced African politics. However,
for now I want to pay special attention to the role of ancestors in African
ethics. Here it needs to be bore in mind that ancestors are regarded as the
custodians of moral values in traditional African societies because religious
beliefs are infused in all the spheres of existence. This is the point which
was well put by John Mbiti (1970: 2–3) when he said that African tradi-
tional religion in Africa permeates “all the departments of life” to the
extent that “there is no formal distinction between the sacred and the
secular, between the religious and the non-religious, between the spiritual
and the material areas of life”. It was one of the main theses of Mbiti that
the African universe was entirely a religious universe because religion per-
meates all spheres of life so that everything in life is interpreted from a
religious perspective. A person is understood primarily in religious terms
10 M. F. MUROVE
and the ethos of the individual’s belongingness to the community has its
origins in the African traditional religious outlook. As he puts it,
“Traditional religions are not primarily for the individual, but for his com-
munity of which he is part. …To be human is to belong to the whole
community, and to do so involves participating in the beliefs, ceremonies,
rituals and festivals of that community”. The religious beliefs and practices
helped to emphasize the idea of the individual’s belongingness to the
community. In African traditional religion, the secular and the sacred are
not compartmentalized as different realms of existence; rather, they are
understood as intertwined with each other and cannot be disentangled
from each other. An individual can participate in the ceremonies, rituals
and festivals of the community without necessarily professing some com-
mitment to a particular doctrine as a precondition to participation in these
religious activities of the community. This African traditional religious
outlook might be the reason why Africans have a general inclusive ethical
outlook.
Whilst in many African languages south of the Sahara there is no word
for religion as understood in Western philosophical and theological pat-
terns of thought, in African traditional patterns of thought what can be
regarded as religion is the relationship that exists between the living and
their ancestors, the land, the natural environment and God. Moral values
are what actually permeate all the spheres of existence. As I said previously,
ancestors are the guardians of these moral values and they are endowed
with the powers to approve or disprove in accordance with what they
would have perceived from their infinite wisdom to be the implications of
the actions of a particular individual or community to the common good
of the generality of existence. Taboos about land and the environment
constituted part of the narrative of ancestral origins. For example, accord-
ing to the oral religious narratives of the Shona and Ndebele people of
Zimbabwe, the God Mwari (a god who was believed to be a god of fertil-
ity and a creator) is believed to dwell at the Matopo Hills. In communion
with the ancestors Mwari would send rains. Because of their proximity to
Mwari, moral precepts from the ancestors are thus regarded as sacrosanct
by all members of the society—whether king or subject. Ancestors are
mostly revered because they are the ones that provide a link between the
world of mortality and immortality. For example, Mbiti called ancestors
‘the living-dead’ because of their ability to commune with both worlds of
the living and that of the ancestors. For this reason he maintained that the
ancestors “speak the language of the spirits and of God” who is
2 AFRICAN ETHICS IN A NUTSHELL 11
has been criticized on the grounds that it overemphasizes the past at the
expense of the present. This type of critique can be discerned from
Augustine Shuttte, who declared that, “If Africa is to play a part in the
worldwide ethical discussion, it cannot be content simply to rehearse its
ancient wisdom in the forms in which it was first formulated” (Shutte
2008: 16). One can easily infer that Shutte is alleging that the African ethi-
cal discourse does not have a relevant role to play in today’s modern world
because of the emphasis that is put on rehearsing ancient wisdom in the
way it was originally formulated. This is an over-exaggerated critique of
African ethics because it is a general human experience that there has never
been a wisdom or an ethical tradition that has remained so static such that
it could be rehearsed in such a way that it is reproduced in a form in which
it was formulated initially. A discourse on ancestors and African ethics does
not demonstrate an uncritical acceptance of traditions; rather it shows that
there is solidarity among the living and the ancestors. This solidarity serves
as a springboard for the narrative nature of African ethics.
In the light of the preceding discussion, we can deduce that because of
its original connection with ancestors, African ethics can be regarded as an
ethics of anamnestic solidarity between the living and their ancestors.
Through the process of remembrance, a relationship is established between
the living and the ancestors. What is remembered in this regard is those
acts of the ancestors which brought the current community into being.
The presumption here is that the present community was originally
brought into being through ancestral ethical rules. Whilst African ethics in
this regard can be regarded as ancestral ethics as stated previously, there is
also room for improvisation where those ethical traditions that were
received from the past are usually interpreted and reinterpreted in the light
of the present contextual experiences. For example, through the use of
proverbs, we are introduced into “…a world in which people, nature and
spiritual world move in step, where social organization, social control and
moral balance are maintained by clearly defined and subtle protocols of
law, custom and rituals articulated in artistic form and where language has
a powerful social purpose and value” (Furusa 1997: 93). The use of prov-
erbs in moral deliberations allows people to use their own intellectual
imagination on what could be the best ethical solution within a particular
given contextual problem. For this reason, anamnestic thinking does not
inhibit the individual from being ethically creative. The room for creative
thinking in African anamnestic ethical thinking was well observed by Bujo
when he said anamnestic thinking “…does not prevent African ethics from
14 M. F. MUROVE
they are liable for the propitiation of Ngozi. Since in African ethics the
individual’s existence is understood collectively, whatever the individual
does has some consequences for the collective. In the world of the ances-
tors, the individual’s existence is understood collectively. For this reason
what the individual does is to be accounted for by the whole community
(Murove 2016: 124; Gelfand 1981: 9; Samkange and Samkange 1980: 51).
Related to the concept of Ngozi is the belief that what has been wronged
or righted in the world of immortality will find its ultimate rectification in
the world of immortality. One is not only accountable to those who exist
in the present, but one’s actions at present do affect those who will exist
in the future. The futuristic aspect inherent in anamnestic solidarity implies
that one not only must be interested in pursuing the good in the present
but has to take into account the consequences of one’s actions to those
who will exist in the future. The main ethical issue that comes from anam-
nestic solidarity comes in the form of a question on the values which the
present generation nurturing for posterity. A harmonious existence in the
present has to be understood in terms of what actually transpired in the
past. This also implies that a situation of disharmony in the present is most
likely to see a situation of perennial social discontent in the future (Murove
2016: 157–158; Maier 1998: 52). People who are usually concerned with
their selfish interests as their main goal in life are most likely to lack any
sense of concern for the wellbeing of those who will exist in the future.
Most of our current problems as a human family can be traced to our
inherited fractured history characterized by a litany of wars, systematic
exploitation of the natural environment, greed and the marginalization of
the weaker members of our human societies. Anamnestic solidarity sum-
mons the human race to look back and learn from what has gone wrong
in the past if ever there is going to be a brighter future. The dominant
modern way of thinking prioritizes the pursuit of self-interest in politics
and economics and remains a threat to anamnestic solidarity.
Another important characteristic which is pivotal to African ethics is
humanism. In the preceding section we have seen that African ethics is
human-centred. Our discussion of ancestors was also based on the belief
in the immortality of a human spirit. Even those who have died continue
to participate in the family or communal affairs of their relatives. Ancestors
regard communal harmony as the main goal of social existence. Anamnestic
solidarity can only exist when there is communal harmony. The goal of
social existence in African traditional societies is to live in harmony with
fellow human beings. As we shall see in Chap. 4, the African post-colonial
16 M. F. MUROVE
in which they find themselves” (Mkhize 2008: 40; also see Gelfand 1973:
57; Samkange and Samkange 1980; Coetzee and Roux 1998: 320; Shutte
2009: 93; Murove 2012). A person is recognized as a person on the basis
of his or her commitment to communal belongingness. Someone who
disregards the wellbeing of the community is hardly recognized as a real
person. It is the quality of social relationships which the individual enters
into with others which ultimately leads the community to refer to her or
him as someone who has Ubuntu. Mogobe Ramose maintained that
Ubuntu is about ‘doing’ instead of ‘being’. He writes, “Because motion is
the principle of be-ing for Ubuntu do-ing takes precedence over the do-er
without at the same time imputing either radical separation or irreconcil-
able opposition between the two” (Ramose 1999: 36). The gist of
Ramose’s observation is that Ubuntu is based on the idea that we are
recognized by others on the basis of what we do.
Relations that show the existence of Ubuntu in the individual are those
relations whereby someone demonstrates an attitude that shows that she
or he regards the humanity of others in a similar way that he or she regards
his or her own.
In Ubuntu it is self-evident that African ethics puts emphasis on com-
munity. In this regard, Ukuba ngumuntu means having a sense of concern
for the wellbeing of others within the community. As Desmond Tutu puts
it, “A person with ubuntu is open and available to others, affirming of oth-
ers, does not feel threatened that others are able and good, for he or she
has a proper self-assurance that comes from knowing that he or she has a
proper self-assurance that comes from knowing that he or she belongs in
a greater whole and is diminished when others are tortured or oppressed,
or treated as if they were less than who they are” (Tutu 1999: 31; also see
Dandala 2009: 261; Prozesky 2009; Bujo 2001: 67). It is within the com-
munal context that the individual’s humanness is recognized. One needs
the community for the realization of one’s own full potential socially and
psychologically. Mluleki Munyaka and Mokgethi Motlhabi propounded
the reality of individual communal belongingness well when they said that,
“It is in a human community that an individual is able to realize himself or
herself as a person. The personal growth of individuals happens in com-
munity. Only through the co-operation, influence and contribution of
others, can one understand and bring to fulfilment one’s own personality.
One is able to discover a sense of self-identity only in reference to the com-
munity in which one lives” (Munyaka and Motlhabi 2009: 70). It is an
18 M. F. MUROVE
towards other people and that this respect will be reciprocated in the
future. The cultivation of the virtue of respect is actually intended to help
the individual in his or her future career. Even those in positions of high
authority such as kings and politicians are usually judged as endowed with
a sense of Ubuntu primarily on the basis of their ability to treat those they
lead with respect. On this point Munyaka and Motlhabi cannot be bet-
tered when they said that, “Ubuntu ethics can be termed anti-egoistic as
it discourages people from seeking their own good without regard for, or
to the detriment of, others and the community” (Munyaka and Motlhabi
2009: 71–72). In the light of the observation of these scholars, it can be
deduced that the virtue of respect in Ubuntu comes in the form of an all-
inclusive outlook to the wellbeing of everybody. One must recognize and
appreciate the reality of the multiplicity of our human modes of being in
the world.
Another implication of Ubuntu which has been observed by scholars is
that it is an ethic of relatedness and interrelatedness. In the ethic of Ubuntu,
a human being is regarded as originally a relational being. She or he is
related and interrelated with others. Thus the primacy of relatedness and
interrelated which is encapsulated in the ethic of Ubuntu was eloquently
articulated by Martin Prozesky (2009: 80) as the foundation of the reality
of our human relatedness and interrelatedness when he said “for every
individual there are countless other selves and even more non-human
objects which greatly affect every individual, so that reality is always, objec-
tively, more constituted by that preponderant externality than by its indi-
vidual subjects on their own”, therefore “any adequate account of human
existence must pay particularly careful attention to the drive to maximize
well-being in relation to the total context of human existence…”.
and the human kingdom; the crocodile could be a god, no sharp divide
between the living and the dead” (Mazrui 1994: 175). The implication of
this observation is that the general African outlook towards life is origi-
nally holistic because everything is understood as intertwined with every-
thing else. It is the existential reality of relatedness and interrelatedness
which ultimately gives the real meaning of what it means to be human.
Among the Shona people of Zimbabwe the concept of relatedness and
interrelatedness finds its articulation in the concept of ukama—a word
which means relationality. However, in Shona, as in many other African
languages, the meaning of Ukama is not restricted to marital and blood
relations. For example, instead of addressing an early person as ‘madam’
or ‘sir’, within the categories of ukama such persons can be addressed as
mama (mother) or baba (father) in Shona, Zulu or Ndebele languages.
The presumption is that being human entails living in relationships, seeing
one another as relatives, or expressing relationality as an indispensable
existential actuality (See Dale 1994: 127; Bourdillon 1976: 34; Gelfand
1973: 136; Murove 2009: 316). Through ukama relationality among
human beings or umuntu is stretched to include God and the ancestors.
In African ethics, the present community has been brought into existence
by those who existed in the past. Those who have existed in the past have
contributed positively or negatively to the present existence. For this rea-
son many scholars have argued that an authentic perspective of African
ethics has to take into account the contributions of ancestors in the mak-
ing of the moral values of the present community. Another main charac-
teristic which we can extract from Ubuntu is the primacy of the community.
In the light of the preceding discussion, it is beyond doubt that African
ethics is a communitarian ethic. It is the community which forms the indi-
vidual and not individuals that form the community. From the Western
philosophical perspective, especially the Hobbesian contractarian theory
of society, it is individuals who enter into a covenant with Leviathan to
form the community with the tacit aim of averting a universal war of all
against all. The Hobbesian community is formed by individuals who see
the formation of the community as a shield against attacks on their self-
interests. The idea of community from this Hobbesian perspective became
an additive congregation of self-interested individuals. Ifeanyi Menkiti
(2001: 197) argued against this Hobbesian philosophical view of com-
munity when he said that this understanding of community is not just “an
ontological claim, but a methodological recommendation to the various
social or humanistic disciplines interested in the investigation of the
2 AFRICAN ETHICS IN A NUTSHELL 23
Locust swarms do not visit the districts that are subject to their
invasions every year, but, as a rule, only after intervals of a
considerable number of years. It has been satisfactorily ascertained
that in both Algeria and North America large swarms occur usually
only at considerable intervals. In North America Riley thought[226]
the average period was about eleven years. In Algeria the first
invasion that occurred after the occupation of the country by the
French was in 1845, the second in 1864, the third in 1866, since
which 1874 and 1891 have been years of invasion. These breaks
seem at first strange, for it would be supposed that as locusts have
great powers of increase, when once they were established in any
spot in large numbers, there would be a constant production of
superfluous individuals which would have to migrate as regularly as
is the case with swarms of bees. The irregularity seems to depend
on three facts: viz. that the increase of locusts is kept in check by
parasitic Insects; that the eggs may remain more than one year in
the ground and yet hatch out when a favourable season occurs; and
that the migratory instinct is only effective when great numbers of
superfluous individuals are produced.
The most obscure point in the natural history of the migratory locusts
appears to be their disappearance from a spot they have invaded. A
swarm will alight on a locality, deposit there a number of eggs, and
then move on. But after a lapse of a season or two there will be few
or none of the species present in the spot invaded. This appears to
be partly due to the young locusts dying for want of food after
hatching; but in other cases they again migrate after growth to the
land of their ancestors. The latter fact is most remarkable, but it has
been ascertained by the U.S. Entomological Commission that these
return swarms do occur.