Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook A Mathematical Perspective On Flight Dynamics and Control 1St Edition Andrea Lafflitto Auth Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook A Mathematical Perspective On Flight Dynamics and Control 1St Edition Andrea Lafflitto Auth Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-mathematical-perspective-on-
flight-dynamics-and-control-1st-edition-andrea-lafflitto-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advanced-flight-dynamics-with-
elements-of-flight-control-1st-edition-nandan-k-sinha/
https://textbookfull.com/product/deviance-and-social-control-a-
sociological-perspective-michelle-l-inderbitzin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-network-organization-a-
governance-perspective-on-structure-dynamics-and-performance-1st-
edition-anna-moretti-auth/
Introduction to Aerospace Engineering with a Flight
Test Perspective 1st Edition Stephen Corda
https://textbookfull.com/product/introduction-to-aerospace-
engineering-with-a-flight-test-perspective-1st-edition-stephen-
corda/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-pure-soul-ennio-de-giorgi-a-
mathematical-genius-andrea-parlangeli/
https://textbookfull.com/product/introduction-to-process-control-
analysis-mathematical-modeling-control-and-optimization-1st-
edition-victor-a-skormin-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/addiction-a-philosophical-
perspective-1st-edition-candice-l-shelby/
https://textbookfull.com/product/open-quantum-systems-a-
mathematical-perspective-dorothea-bahns/
SPRINGER BRIEFS IN
APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY
Andrea L'Afflitto
A Mathematical
Perspective on
Flight Dynamics
and Control
123
SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences
and Technology
SpringerBriefs present concise summaries of cutting-edge research and practical
applications across a wide spectrum of fields. Featuring compact volumes of 50 to
125 pages, the series covers a range of content from professional to academic.
Typical publications can be:
A Mathematical Perspective
on Flight Dynamics
and Control
123
Andrea L’Afflitto
School of Aerospace and Mechanical
Engineering
The University of Oklahoma
Norman, OK
USA
One of the remarkable aspects that distinguished the Wright brothers from other
flight enthusiasts at the time was their careful analysis of flight dynamics. This
included developing the first wind tunnel to quantify the aerodynamic forces as a
function of wing shape. Their systematic, scientific approach eventually led to the
first successful powered flight under human control. Since the time of the Wright
brothers, the development of novel flight strategies has required a solid under-
standing of flight dynamics and control. The need for scientist and engineers who
understand flight at a deep level has become even more critical with the advent and
rapid development of autonomous unmanned aerial systems (UAS). In the future,
even more sophisticated and agile aerial platforms will be developed, and the design
of successful flight control strategies will require knowledge of attitude represen-
tations that can capture the entire flight envelop, even though these representations
require the designer to employ sophisticated mathematical tools. It will also require
the best available control design strategies.
There currently exist a wide variety of excellent teaching and resource materials
focused on helping scientists and engineers master the mathematical prerequisites to
work on UAS and other flight control areas. To this body of material, the current
monograph is a welcome addition. The monograph focuses on mathematical
aspects of flight dynamics and control. The list of topics include attitude repre-
sentation using Tait–Bryan (Euler 321) angles, and quaternions, a nice derivation
of the equations of motion of a rigid body, a careful analysis of the common flight
modes, and a mathematically rigorous discussion of common strategies used for
flight control. The material is self-contained and highly readable. This monograph
will be helpful for students and practitioners who are looking for a mathematically
rigorous development of the dynamics and control of fixed wing aircraft.
v
Preface
vii
viii Preface
so that the reader can fully appreciate every detail about the relations between Euler
parameters, rotations, and angular velocity. Although most of the books on
dynamics successfully explain the notion of axis of rotation and the role it plays in
the definition of the Euler parameters, the derivation of the relation between the
angular velocity of a rigid body and the time derivatives of the Euler parameters is
often omitted for brevity or proved starting from some nonintuitive result.
The equations of motion of an aircraft are presented in Chap. 2 both as functions
of the Tait–Bryan angles and the Euler parameters. Since the equations of motion of
an aircraft are a set of implicit nonlinear differential equations, the linearization
of these equations is a delicate process that requires some machinery, which is
discussed in detail in this brief. Chapter 2 is also dedicated to the analysis of the
longitudinal- and lateral- directional dynamics of a vehicle without relying on any
intuition or observation of the physical behavior of aircraft, but dissecting the
properties of the linearized equations of motion.
The proportional-integral-derivative control technique, the linear-quadratic
Gaussian regulator, the optimal state feedback H1 control, and the model refer-
ence adaptive control are presented in Chap. 3 and applied through meaningful
numerical examples to the problem of controlling the attitude of an aircraft. Lastly,
Appendix A is a brief compendium of the mathematical tools needed to compre-
hend the material presented in this brief. Appendix A presents also some advanced
topics, such as the notion of semistability, the Smith–McMillan form of a transfer
function, and the differentiation of complex functions; these concepts are usually
omitted in most reference books for engineers, but are fundamental to appreciate
several details on the dynamics and control design of linear-dynamical systems.
This brief does not pretend to be complete. For instance, stability derivatives are
merely mentioned and aircrafts are modeled as six degrees-of-freedom rigid bodies,
in which center of mass moves at Mach number less than or equal to 3. Moreover,
the results presented in this brief apply only if we assume that the Earth is fixed in
space and locally flat. Lastly, this brief does not pretend to exhaustively illustrate all
the control techniques that can be applied to aircraft. The reader is referred through
this monograph to relevant books and publications for further reading on all the
topics covered herein. Hopefully, at the end of this brief, the readers will be able to
better appreciate the work of the scholars who preceded and will follow us.
Writing a monograph while serving as a first year assistant professor has been a
unique experience. The vibrant enthusiasm of the graduate and undergraduate
students I am proudly advising, as well as of those students attending my AME
4513/5513 ‘Flight Controls’ class, has strongly motivated me; I am indebted to
them for their comments, questions, and suggestions. I also wish to express my
deep gratitude to Prof. R.W. Beard, who provided his invaluable comments and
considerably improved the quality of this work. Finally, I want to thank Mr. Oliver
Jackson, the editor of this book, for his outstanding guidance over the course of the
editorial process.
Preface ix
“O frati,” dissi, “che per cento milia ‘O brothers, who amid a hundred thousand
perigli siete giunti a l’occidente, perils,’ I said, ‘have come unto the West,
a questa tanto picciola vigilia to this so inconsiderable vigil
d’i nostri sensi ch’è del rimanente which is remaining of your senses still
non vogliate negar l’esperïenza, be ye unwilling to deny the knowledge,
di retro al sol, del mondo sanza gente. following the sun, of the unpeopled world.
xi
xii Contents
1.1 Introduction
One of the main objectives of physics is to understand the fundamental laws of nature
and describe physical events in a rigorous manner. Mathematics provides the tools
needed to accomplish this goal and, in fact, it is not a chance that most of the early
physicists, such as Newton or Lagrange, were also mathematicians. A wide branch of
physics is dynamics, which is concerned with the behavior of physical bodies when
subject to forces or displacements, and a consistent part of this brief is dedicated to
the study of aircraft dynamics.
In this chapter, we define a few mathematical entities, such as vectors, orthonor-
mal basis, quaternions, and rotation matrices, and discuss some of their most relevant
properties. Eventually, these mathematical tools are applied to physics to capture the
motion of rigid bodies in space. Specifically, in Sect. 1.2 we introduce the notions of
vector space and reference frame and in Sect. 1.3 we discuss the problem of comput-
ing the first derivative of vectors with respect to a time-varying basis. The problem
of capturing rotations of reference frames is discussed at length in Sects. 1.4 and
1.5, where we introduce the Tait–Bryan angles and Euler parameters, respectively.
Finally, the problem of computing the second derivative of vectors with respect to a
time-dependent basis is addressed in Sect. 1.6 and the equations of motion for a rigid
body are derived in Sect. 1.7.
Vector spaces play a key role in dynamics, as they provide the most suitable frame-
work to describe the displacement of bodies in space. For the statement of the next
definition, let X denote either the set of real numbers R or the set of complex numbers
C. In the following, we will refer to X as the field of scalars and the elements of X
as scalars.
© The Author(s) 2017 1
A. L’Afflitto, A Mathematical Perspective on Flight Dynamics and Control,
SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47467-0_1
2 1 Fundamentals of Rigid Body Dynamics
Definition 1.1 (Vector space) A vector space over a field of scalars X is a nonempty
set X, which elements are called vectors, together with two operations called addition,
which is denoted by +, and multiplication of vectors by scalars, which is denoted
by ·. The vector addition associates with every x, y ∈ X a vector x + y, and the
following properties are satisfied for every x, y, z ∈ X:
(i) x + y = y + x (commutative property);
(ii) x + (y + z) = (x + y) + z (associative property);
(iii) there exists a vector, called zero vector, such that x + 0 = x;
(iv) for every x ∈ X, there exists a vector, which we denote by −x, such that
x + (−x) = 0.
The multiplication of vectors by scalars associates with every α ∈ X and x ∈ X
a vector α · x, and the following properties are satisfied for every x, y ∈ X and
α, β ∈ X:
(i) there exists an element in X that we denote by 1 such that 1 · x = x;
(ii) α · (β · x) = (αβ) · x;
(iii) (α + β) · x = α · x + β · x.
In the following, we will omit the symbol · to denote the multiplication of vectors
by scalars. There exist many examples of vector fields, such as the real column vectors
Rn , the real matrices Rn×m , the complex column vectors Cn , and the complex matrices
Cn×m . It is important to note that the set of real column vectors Rn is a subset of the
set of real matrices, since a vector in Rn is a matrix with one column and n rows.
Henceforth, we will consider column vectors only and therefore we will no longer
specify that vectors are column vectors.
For the statement of the next definition, let X denote R or C.
α1 x1 + · · · + αm xm = 0 (1.1)
Remarkably, there exist infinitely many vector bases for Rn and for Cn . Moreover,
the order of the vectors forming the basis M = {x1 , x2 , . . . , xn } ⊂ Xn is immaterial.
Indeed, if M is a basis, then also M = {x2 , x1 , . . . , xn } is a basis of Xn .
Aα = 0, (1.2)
1.2 Vectors and Vector Spaces 3
where ⎡ ⎤
α1
⎢ ⎥
A = x1 , . . . , xn , α = ⎣ ... ⎦ . (1.3)
αn
Therefore, it follows from Theorems A.8 and A.9 that M is a basis for Rn if and only
if A is nonsingular, that is, if and only if det(A) = 0.
Proposition 1.1 ([28, pp. 54–55]) Let M = {x1 , . . . , xn } be a basis of Rn . Then, for
all x ∈ Rn there exist α1 , . . . , αn ∈ R such that x = α1 x1 + · · · + αn xn .
Definition 1.3 (Vector components) Let M = {x1 , . . . , xn } be a basis of Rn and x ∈
Rn . If x = α1 x1 + · · · + αn xn , then the scalars α1 , . . . , αn are the components of x in
the basis M. Consider the basis M = {x1 , . . . , xn } of Rn and x⎡ = ⎤ α1 x1 + · · · + αn xn .
α1
⎢ ⎥
If we fix the order of the elements of M, then we write x = ⎣ ... ⎦ = [α1 , . . . , αn ]T ,
αn
and we say that x is expressed in the basis M.
Definition 1.4 (Scalar product) Let x = [x1 , . . . , xn ]T ∈ Rn and y = [y1 , . . . , yn ]T
∈ Rn . The scalar product of x and y is given by
n
xT y xi yi . (1.4)
i=1
Exercise 1.3 Prove that the cross product is anti-commutative, that is, x × y =
−y × x.
x × y × z = x T zy − x T yz, (1.8)
x × y × z = −y × z × x − z × x × y. (1.9)
Equations (1.8) and (1.9) are known as Lagrange formula and Jacobi identity, respec-
tively.
v = vT X X + vT Y Y + vT Z Z . (1.10)
1.2 Vectors and Vector Spaces 5
In this brief, time is the only independent variable and is denoted by t. Without loss
of generality, we assume that time is always nonnegative, that is, t ≥ 0.
d d x(t) dy(t)
[x(t) + y(t)] = + , t ≥ 0, (1.12)
dt dt dt
d T d x T (t) dy(t) d x(t) dy(t)
x (t)y(t) = y(t) + x T (t) = y T (t) + x T (t) ,
dt dt dt dt dt
(1.13)
×
d × d x(t) dy(t) dy(t) d x(t)
x (t)y(t) = y(t) + x × (t) = x × (t) − y × (t) .
dt dt dt dt dt
(1.14)
Example 1.1 (Time derivative of a vector in a fixed reference frame) Let I = {O; X,
Y, Z } be an orthonormal reference frame centered at O ∈ R3 and
Remark 1.2 The angular velocity of the reference frame J with respect to I is
expressed in the reference frame J.
The relevance of Remark 1.2 can be appreciated considering the following appli-
cation. Let O be a point fixed in space, and X, Y, Z be orthonormal vectors fixed in
space. Let J = {P(·); x(·), y(·), z(·)} be an orthonormal reference frame fixed with
an aircraft, that is, let P(·) be a point fixed in the aircraft, and x(·), y(·), z(·) be three
orthonormal vectors that are fixed with the aircraft. The aircraft angular velocity with
respect to an inertial reference frame I, that is, I ωJ (·), is measured by the gyroscopes
installed on the aircraft and is expressed in the reference frame J.
It follows from (1.17) that to define the angular velocity of the reference frame
J with respect to the reference frame I, it is irrelevant whether the axes of I are
functions of time or not; the notion of angular velocity regards the relative motion of
two reference frames. Next, we discuss a key application of angular velocities, that
is, we compute the time derivative of a vector fixed in a moving reference frame. For
the proof of this result, given x ∈ R3 and y ∈ R3 , we denote by x y a dyadic, that is,
a matrix such that z T x y = z T (x y) for any z ∈ R3 [26, p. 67].
that is,
d x T (t)
0= x(t), t ≥ 0. (1.23)
dt I
that is,
dz T (t) d x(t)
− x(t) = z T
(t) , t ≥ 0. (1.25)
dt I dt I
8 1 Fundamentals of Rigid Body Dynamics
Since x(t), y(t), and z(t), t ≥ 0, are mutually orthogonal unit vectors, it holds that
[26, p. 67]
and hence
I J
× d x T (t)
ω (t) x(t) = [x(t)x(t) + y(t)y(t) + z(t)z(t)]
dt I
d x T (t)
= [X X + Y Y + Z Z ]
dt I
d x T (t) d x T (t) d x T (t)
= XX + YY + ZZ
dt I dt I dt I
d x(t)
= , t ≥ 0. (1.28)
dt I
Similarly,
I J
× dy(t) I J
× dz(t)
ω (t) y(t) = , ω (t) z(t) = , t ≥ 0. (1.29)
dt I dt I
In Example 1.1, the components of r (·) are expressed in the reference frame I,
whereas in Theorem 1.2 the components of r (·) are known in J.
Remark 1.3 Equation (1.19) provides the derivative of r (·) with respect to the refer-
ence frame I expressed in the reference frame J.
The next result extends Theorem 1.2 to the case of r (·) not fixed in J. For the state-
ment of the next result, let J = {P(·); x(·), y(·), z(·)} be an orthonormal reference
frame centered at P : [0, ∞) → R3 , where x, y, z : [0, ∞) → R3 are continuously
differentiable, and
dr (t) dr x (t) dr y (t) dr z (t)
x(t) + y(t) + z(t), t ≥ 0, (1.31)
dt J dt dt dt
Remark 1.4 Equation (1.33) provides the derivative of r (·) with respect to the refer-
ence frame I expressed in the reference frame J.
The next result allows us to compute the angular velocities using auxiliary refer-
ence frames.
Theorem 1.4 Let I = {O; X, Y, Z } be an orthonormal reference frame centered
at O ∈ R3 , J = {P(·); x(·), y(·), z(·)} be an orthonormal reference frame centered
at P : [0, ∞) → R3 , and J = {P (·); x (·), y (·), z (·)} be an orthonormal refer-
ence frame centered at P : [0, ∞) → R3 , where x, y, z, x , y , z : [0, ∞) → R3
are continuously differentiable. Then,
I
ωJ (t) = I ωJ (t) + J ωJ (t), (1.35)
for all t ≥ 0.
Proof It follows from Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 that for all r (t) = r x x(t) + r y y(t) +
r z z(t), where r x , r y , r z ∈ R are constant,
dr (t) ×
= I ωJ (t) r (t), t ≥ 0, (1.36)
dt I
×
dr (t)
= J ωJ (t) r (t), (1.37)
dt J
×
dr (t) dr (t) I J
= + ω (t) r (t). (1.38)
dt I dt J
Hence,
I × × ×
ωJ (t) r (t) = J
ωJ (t) r (t) + I
ωJ (t) r (t), t ≥ 0, (1.39)
that is,
I
ωJ (t) = J ωJ (t) + I ωJ (t), t ≥ 0, (1.40)
where
and
⎡ ⎤
cos ψ − sin ψ 0
Ψ (ψ) ⎣ sin ψ cos ψ 0⎦ , (1.43)
0 0 1
⎡ ⎤
cos θ 0 sin θ
Θ(θ ) ⎣ 0 1 0 ⎦ , (1.44)
− sin θ 0 cos θ
⎡ ⎤
1 0 0
Φ(φ) ⎣0 cos φ − sin φ ⎦ . (1.45)
0 sin φ cos φ
Exercise 1.9 Prove that Ψ (·), Θ(·), and Φ(·) given by (1.43), (1.44), and (1.45) are
rotation matrices, that is,
Prove also that R321 (·) is a rotation matrix. Hint: Recall Exercise A.5.
For details on orthogonal and rotation matrices, refer to Sect. A.6.2. In light of
Exercise 1.9, we define (1.43)–(1.45) as the yaw, pitch, and roll rotation matrices,
respectively. The next result is quite relevant, since it proves that x, y, and z in (1.41)
can be used to form an orthonormal reference frame.
det (R321 (ψ, θ, φ)[X, Y, Z ]) = det (R321 (ψ, θ, φ)) det ([X, Y, Z ]) , t ≥ 0,
(1.48)
and it follows from Remark 1.1 that det ([X, Y, Z ]) = 0. Furthermore, it follows from
Exercise 1.9 that det (R321 (ψ, θ, φ)) = 1. Therefore, it follows from (1.41) that
and it can be proven in a similar manner that y2 = z2 = 1. Thus, J is an ortho-
normal reference frame.
which imply that the axes X , Y , and Z are obtained from x(·), y(·), and z(·), respec-
tively, through a rotation about the axis z(·) of an angle ψ(·); see Fig. 1.1. As discussed
14 1 Fundamentals of Rigid Body Dynamics
in Remark 1.5 and as can be observed from Fig. 1.1, (1.52) captures the apparent rota-
tion about z(t) of the reference frame I, which is fixed in space, with respect to the
moving reference frame J of an angle ψ(t). Alternatively, (1.52) captures the actual
rotation of J about z(t) of an angle −ψ(t).
where Θ(·) is given by (1.44). Show that X , Y , and Z are obtained from x(·), y(·),
and z(·), respectively, through a rotation about the axis y(·) of an angle θ (·).
where Φ(·) is given by (1.45). Show that X , Y , and Z are obtained from x(·), y(·),
and z(·), respectively, through a rotation about the axis x(·) of an angle φ(·).
It follows from Example 1.2 and Exercises 1.10 and 1.11 that if
where
It follows from Exercise 1.9 that R321 (·), defined in (1.42), is a rotation matrix.
Hence, it follows from Theorem A.14 that an eigenvalue of R321 (·) is equal to one,
that is, 1 ∈ spec(R321 (ψ, θ, φ)), for all ψ ∈ [0, 2π ), θ ∈ − π2 , π2 , and φ ∈ [0, 2π ).
Moreover, it follows from Theorem A.12 that there exists p ∈ R3 such that
This vector p is not affected by the rotation captured by R321 (·) and hence character-
izes the subspace of all vectors that are transformed by the R321 (·) into themselves.
Definition 1.11 (Rotation axis) Consider the rotation matrix R321 (·) defined in
(1.42). The rotation axis of R321 (·) is the eigenvector p ∈ R3 of R321 (·) associated
to the unit eigenvalue of R321 (·) such that p = 1.
Note that if ψ(·), θ (·), and φ(·) are functions of time, then R321 (·) is a function
of time; for details, see (1.59). Consequently, also the rotation axis p(·) varies with
time.
In the following, we discuss the role of rotation matrices in the problem of express-
ing vectors in different reference frames. The first of these results establishes a rela-
tion between rotating reference frames and constant vectors.
Theorem 1.6 Let I = {O; X, Y, Z } and J = {O; x(·), y(·), z(·)} be orthonormal
reference frames centered at O, such that (1.58) is satisfied. Then,
r = r X X + rY Y + r Z Z
Proof It follows from Exercise 1.8 and (1.41) that r can be expressed in the reference
frame J as
in the reference frame I are the components of r (t), expressed in the reference frame
J. It is crucial to note that the components of v in the reference frame J vary with
t because the basis vectors x(t), y(t), and z(t) vary with t. The following result
concerns the effect of the rotation of J with respect to I on a vector r that is constant
in J.
Exercise 1.12 Let I = {O; X, Y, Z } and J = {O; x(·), y(·), z(·)} be orthonormal
reference frames centered at O, such that (1.58) is satisfied. Prove that
1.4 Tait–Bryan Angles and Rotations 17
in the reference frame J are the components of r (t), expressed in the reference frame
I. Theorem 1.6 and Exercise 1.12 show the central role of of the rotation matrix
R321 (·) in the problem of expressing vectors in different reference frames.
Numerous examples on the applications of Theorem 1.6 and Exercise 1.12 can be
found in the literature on dynamics. For instance, refer to [4, Chap. 2], [17, Chap.
2], and [49, Chap. 1].
Consider the rotating reference frames I and J. In the following, we prove some
relations between the angular velocity I ωJ (·) and the time derivatives of the Tait–
Bryan angles ψ(·), θ (·), φ(·). To this goal, it is key to recall that a 3-2-1 rotation
sequence captures the apparent rotation of the fixed reference frame I with respect
to the moving reference frame J.
Example 1.3 Let the attitude of the reference frame I = {O; X (·), Y (·), Z (·)} with
respect to I = {O; X, Y, Z } be captured by the Tait–Bryan angles ψ : [0, ∞) →
[0, 2π ), θ (t) = 0, t ≥ 0, and φ(t) = 0, where ψ(·) is continuously differentiable.
Then it follows from (1.41) that
As discussed in Example 1.2 and in Remark 1.5, (1.65)–(1.67) capture the rotation
of the reference frame I with respect to I of an angle −ψ(·). Hence, for a positive
rotation ψ(·), it holds that
I
ωI (t) = ψ̇(t)Z , t ≥ 0. (1.69)
Equation (1.69) implies that the angular velocity due to the rotation of the reference
frame I with respect to I of an angle ψ(t), t ≥ 0, about the axis z is a vector parallel
to Z , whose magnitude is equal to ψ̇(t).
18 1 Fundamentals of Rigid Body Dynamics
Exercise 1.13 Let the attitude of the reference frame I = {O; X (·), Y (·), Z (·)}
with respect to I = {O; X , Y , Z } be captured by the Tait–Bryan angles
θ : [0, ∞) → − π2 , π2 , ψ(t) = 0, t ≥ 0, and φ(t) = 0, where θ (·) is continuously
differentiable. Prove that
I
ωI (t) = θ̇ (t)Y (t), t ≥ 0. (1.70)
Exercise 1.14 Let the attitude of the reference frame J = {O; x(·), y(·), z(·)} with
respect to I = {O; X , Y , Z } be captured by the Tait–Bryan angles φ : [0, ∞) →
[0, 2π ), ψ(t) = 0, t ≥ 0, and θ (t) = 0, where φ(·) is continuously differentiable.
Prove that
I J
ω (t) = φ̇(t)x(t), t ≥ 0. (1.71)
The next result is quite relevant for aerospace applications as it expresses the
angular velocity of a moving reference frame as a function of the time derivatives of
the Tait–Bryan angles.
Theorem 1.7 Let I = {O; X, Y, Z } and J = {O; x(·), y(·), z(·)} be orthonormal
reference frames centered at O. If (1.58) is satisfied by the continuously differentiable
functions ψ(·), θ (·), and φ(·), then
⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤
1 0 − sin θ (t) φ̇(t)
ω (t) = ⎣0 cos φ(t) cos θ (t) sin φ(t) ⎦ ⎣ θ̇ (t) ⎦ ,
I J
t ≥ 0, (1.72)
0 − sin φ(t) cos θ (t) cos φ(t) ψ̇(t)
Proof By proceeding as in Example 1.3 and Exercises 1.13 and 1.14, introduce
the auxiliary orthonormal reference frames I = {O; X (·), Y (·), Z (·)} and I =
{O; X (·), Y (·), Z (·)}, where X , Y , Z , X , Y , Z : [0, ∞) → R3 are continu-
ously differentiable. The reference frame I is obtained from I through a rotation of
ψ(·) about the z axis, whereas I is obtained from I through a rotation of θ (·) about
the y axis.
It follows from Theorem 1.4 that
I
ωJ (t) = I ωI (t) + I ωI (t) + I ωJ (t) = ψ̇(t)Z + θ̇ (t)Y (t) + φ̇(t)x(t), t ≥ 0,
(1.73)
and it follows from Example 1.2 and Exercises 1.10 and 1.11 that
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PUNCTUATION
PERSONIFIED ***
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.