Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download textbook Behind From The Start How America S War On The Poor Is Harming Our Most Vulnerable Children 1St Edition Azzi Lessing ebook all chapter pdf
Download textbook Behind From The Start How America S War On The Poor Is Harming Our Most Vulnerable Children 1St Edition Azzi Lessing ebook all chapter pdf
https://textbookfull.com/product/language-unlimited-the-science-
behind-our-most-creative-power-david-adger/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-path-to-war-how-the-first-
world-war-created-modern-america-1st-edition-neiberg/
The War Before the War Fugitive Slaves and the Struggle
for America s Soul from the Revolution to the Civil War
Andrew Delbanco
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-war-before-the-war-fugitive-
slaves-and-the-struggle-for-america-s-soul-from-the-revolution-
to-the-civil-war-andrew-delbanco/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-man-from-the-train-
discovering-america-s-most-elusive-serial-killer-first-scribner-
trade-paperback-edition-james/
How The SPECTER OF COMMUNISM IS RULING OUR WORLD 1st
Edition The Epoch Times
https://textbookfull.com/product/how-the-specter-of-communism-is-
ruling-our-world-1st-edition-the-epoch-times/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-trouble-with-tribbles-the-
story-behind-star-trek-s-most-popular-episode-7th-edition-
gerrold/
https://textbookfull.com/product/blockchain-revolution-how-the-
technology-behind-bitcoin-is-changing-money-business-and-the-
world-tapscott/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-trouble-with-tribbles-the-
story-behind-star-trek-s-most-popular-episode-7th-edition-
gerrold-david/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-peyote-effect-from-the-
inquisition-to-the-war-on-drugs-alexander-s-dawson/
╇ i
1
iv
1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers
the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University
Press in the UK and certain other countries.
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc., United States of America
v
For Ben.
vi
╇ vii
Contents
Foreword ix
Acknowledgments xiii
1. Introduction 1
3. From the War on Poverty to the War on Poor Families: History and Ideology 32
5. It Takes a Firestorm: How the Child Welfare System Perpetuates the Cycle 85
6. The Emperor’s Old Clothes: The False Promise of Simple Solutions 107
Notes 191
Index 221
vii
viii
╇ ix
Foreword
by Lisbeth B. Schorr
Lenette Azzi-╉Lessing’s book stands alone among important social policy books
in synthesizing the critical knowledge from all of the domains that must be
connected if ambitious social change is to succeed. She draws on the most cur-
rent findings from research and from experience. She documents the unmet
needs of vulnerable young children, adolescents, and their families, and puts it
all together to identify the unparalleled opportunities now at hand to address
those needs.
Professor Azzi-╉Lessing’s own wide-╉ranging experience runs from creating a
school for disruptive adolescents, to organizing multiple service providers to
work coherently with marginalized families, to advocating for the policies that
could support high-╉quality, responsive services and supports. It extends from
cuddling an affection-╉starved three-╉year-╉old in a children’s shelter to her deci-
sion to join the academic world in search of the most powerful levers to bring
about audacious change. She persuasively makes the case that our social policies
need to move beyond scaling up isolated “evidence-╉based” programs to estab-
lishing the systems and providing the resources that could bring about bright
futures for the children now destined for grim tomorrows.
In writing this book, Azzi-╉Lessing also aims to increase the American public’s
understanding of the plethora of interconnected circumstances that conspire to
keep millions of children poor in the world’s richest country. She explores the
ix
x
x Foreword
disconnect between what most Americans believe about plentiful government
assistance to poor families and the diminished and fragmented resources that
are actually available. She examines the ways in which the safety net continues to
fray, with consequences that are often catastrophic for young children in families
stuck at the bottom.
Drawing on the newest research that demonstrates that much of the physical
structure of the human brain is developed in the first few years of life, she explains
how the stress of being raised in poverty can harm young children’s intertwined
learning ability and emotional stability and how adversity in children’s earliest
years can interfere with the physical “wiring” of the brain affecting lifelong capaci-
ties for learning as well as physical and mental health. Azzi-Lessing argues that
although the public and policymakers are attracted to simple, piecemeal, and in-
expensive fixes, the current patchwork of dysfunctional and disjointed programs
and policies is insufficient to make a lasting difference for the most vulnerable
families. She documents how the widespread illusion that there are simple, cheap
fixes for the complex array of interconnected problems poor families face and the
fetishizing of medical-model, randomized trials as the only ways to determine
which programs work have contributed to rising levels of public and political
cynicism and the miserly allocation of funding for identifying and building real
solutions.
Azzi-Lessing does not stop at describing the problems of the children and
families left behind by America’s prosperity, or the weaknesses of fragmented
and underfunded attempts to help. She also lays out what she has termed the
extra-strength strategies that could lift families out of poverty and improve their
children’s futures.
She calls for the development of innovative, comprehensive initiatives that ad-
dress multiple needs simultaneously rather than piece by piece and that build on
the strengths present in even the most vulnerable families. She describes how the
shape and scope of efforts to help would benefit from including the voices, needs,
and preferences of families targeted by antipoverty and child development initia-
tives. She points up the importance of supporting innovation and experimentation
in trying and testing more powerful approaches aimed toward breaking the cycle.
She calls attention to the fact that the situation of many of the most fragile
families is the culmination of generations of deprivation and living in the mar-
gins of society. If these families are to become financially self-sufficient and to
meet the needs of their children, they need more long-lasting and more skilled,
respectful help than they are now offered.
One of the great values of Azzi-Lessing’s book is her emphasis on how much we
know about “what works”:
xi
Foreword xi
• Relationships hold the power to change lives.
• The quality of care a young child receives affects lifelong physical and
emotional health.
• When caregivers—be they parents, foster parents, or child carestaff
members—have the support and assistance they need, they are much
better equipped to successfully nurture the children in their care.
• Chronic and complex problems require long-term and multifaceted
interventions.
• The most promising strategies recognize and build upon the strengths
found in even the most vulnerable families.
xii Foreword
children and their families. She points to the findings of Dr. Jack Shonkoff of the
Harvard Center on the Developing Child that
large numbers of young children and families who are at greatest risk, par-
ticularly those experiencing toxic stress associated with persistent poverty
complicated by child maltreatment, maternal depression, parental sub-
stance abuse, and ⁄or interpersonal violence, do not appear to benefit sig-
nificantly from existing programs.
Azzi-Lessing agrees with Shonkoff that these disappointing results arise because
the needs of children growing up in families and neighborhoods that cannot
support healthy development are far more extensive than those in the general
population. They outstrip the capacity of most existing early intervention pro-
grams. The needs of families facing exceedingly complex social and economic
disruptions—when they do participate—t ypically overwhelm conventional early
childhood program staff whose expertise is often restricted to child development
and parenting education.
Azzi-Lessing challenges the conventional wisdom that the voting public will
not support high-quality programs unless they are available to poor and nonpoor
alike. She suggests that a larger segment of the public would support investments
in programs aimed primarily toward impoverished children and their families if
these programs were to demonstrate their effectiveness—w ith both stories and
numbers—in making sustained, meaningful differences in outcomes, and if the
public could be encouraged to see the opportunities to help these families with
both their economic and child-nurturing prospects.
Virtually uniquely among the experts deeply involved in improving services
and programs for vulnerable families, Azzi-Lessing’s vision extends beyond the
programmatic. She also explores the opportunities to change lives through major
policy changes, including strengthening systems that address child protection,
income supports, and work readiness and job training.
Dr. Donald Berwick, the preeminent health care reformer and change agent,
has written that “People committed to science ought to supply not just skepti-
cism but also hope.” In this important book, Lenette Azzi-Lessing couples the
findings from science and experience with her sharp analytic skills to provide us
with the hope we need if we are to counter, in her words, “the cumulative, harm-
ful impacts of poverty, family and community violence, impaired parenting, and
other serious risk factors that threaten the optimal development of millions of
young children.”
xiii
Acknowledgments
xiv Acknowledgments
from experts in other nations, I also appreciate the insights shared by Alison
Garnham, director of Britain’s Child Poverty Action Group, and by colleagues at
the University of Fort Hare and its surrounding community in the Eastern Cape
of South Africa. I am also grateful to staff members at the National Center for
Children in Poverty, the Economic Policy Institute, and the National Coalition for
Evidence-Based Policy for generously sharing their work.
I want to thank Dana Bliss, my editor at Oxford University Press, for recog-
nizing from the beginning the potential of this project, and for his guidance in
making this book accessible to the wide audience I intended to reach. I owe a
great debt to Lisbeth “Lee” Schorr for her mentorship, suggestions, and reading
of draft chapters and for so generously writing the book’s foreword. Through her
own highly influential and important writing, Lee provided an invaluable com-
pass that has guided much of my work in academia as well as in the field. Many
thanks to Charlie Milner, who helped me think through the messaging aspects of
antipoverty initiatives. And I am forever indebted to Sandra Enos for many illu-
minating conversations, ideas, and advice, and to her and Deoshore Haig for their
friendship and loving encouragement throughout the writing process.
Lastly, I must express my appreciation to my family for their love and support.
During the writing of this book, our daughters, Rachel and Madeline Lessing,
grew into lovely, courageous young women who cheered me on from beginning
to end. And no one inspired and encouraged the work on these pages more than
Ben Lessing, my husband of many years. For your endless reading of multiple
chapters, late-night listening sessions, and most of all, your faith in this project
and me, I dedicate this book to you with much love and gratitude.
╇ xv
1 Introduction
M y journey towa rd writing this book began more than twenty years ago
when I was an administrator in a community mental health center in Rhode
Island, charged with developing a range of counseling and other services for trou-
bled children and their families. During that time, one experience seared itself
in my memory like no other. I was visiting a nearby children’s shelter to discuss
with its director ways in which we might collaborate in ensuring that the chil-
dren living there could access the specialized mental health services they needed.
The shelter was funded by the state child welfare agency, the Department for
Children and Families (DCF), as a short-term setting for children who had been
removed from their biological families due to maltreatment. I knew that the chil-
dren living in the shelter would have significant needs for the services my agency
provided, as I realized that most came from deprived circumstances in poor fami-
lies, a situation that often results in delays in child development and learning
abilities. I also realized that the trauma of having been abused or severely ne-
glected, combined with the additional trauma of having been abruptly removed
from their families, meant that the children in the shelter were likely to have
behavioral and emotional problems requiring specialized and intensive therapy.
1
2
Introduction 3
Another experience while at that same job strongly influenced not only the
writing of this book but the trajectory of my career. I was charged with creating
a school for adolescents whose behaviors were too disruptive for them to remain
even in the specialized classrooms provided by the local public school districts.
This alternative school was to have low teacher–student ratios, specially trained
and well-supported teachers, and therapeutic and family engagement services—
resources that were in short supply in special education programs in the public
schools. With funding from two urban school districts along with a few startup
grants, we hired carefully selected teachers, therapists, and outreach workers and
opened the school in a building that once housed a Catholic school.
The alternative school was a success in that a number of additional school
districts began referring their more troubled students to the program. In fact,
we were receiving so many referrals that the program quickly outgrew its ini-
tial home. It now operates in a number of locations throughout Rhode Island,
serving hundreds of students with severe behavior and learning problems. In the
school’s earliest months of operation, I took on the task of reviewing the records
of the youths who had been referred to the program. Nearly all of them were
from very low-income families and most were either black or Hispanic. Most of
these youths were referred to our program after having threatened and/or at-
tacked classmates or teachers or frequently engaging in behavior so disruptive
that even in classrooms with special education teachers, they prevented other
students from learning. Not surprisingly, many of the students in our program
already had encounters with the criminal justice system.
I noticed something else in the records accompanying students referred to our
alternative school program. In nearly every case, these boys had begun exhibiting
behavioral and/or emotional problems early in life, usually by the age of three or
four. In most cases, their parent—usually a single mother—had attempted to get
help but was unsuccessful. Reasons for this varied. Sometimes the mother had
brought her child to counseling sessions, but the family’s services were termi-
nated because they missed a few appointments. In other cases, mothers sought
help in caring for and disciplining their children but learned that no such help
was available, or that it required private insurance or had unaffordable fees. For
many families, a lack of reliable transportation to where services were located
made getting help even more difficult.
What I saw in the records of the tough, indifferent, angry, and disruptive youths
referred to our alternative school was how relatively small, early life problems
had spiraled into much larger and often-intractable ones, with little intervention
until they become too much for even special education programs to handle. I read
story after story of young mothers trying to find and access services that either
4
Following the course of those maps and witnessing situations like Joey’s led me
to quit my job at the mental health center and begin building an organization
that would address the needs of impoverished families with young children in a
comprehensive and responsive way. Those same experiences also sent me back to
school to pursue a doctorate, as I sought to learn more about how extreme disad-
vantage is passed from one generation to another. During that time, I learned that
much of the human brain is formed in the earliest years of life rather than before
birth, and that the conditions under which babies and young children live play
a major role in their lifelong ability to learn and succeed. I read studies showing
how nature and nurture influence one another over time and over generations, es-
sentially locking in advantage for some families and disadvantage for others. The
more research I read, the more I realized just how important it is to intervene early
in the lives of children at risk for rotten outcomes if we want to help these children
avoid such outcomes and have a decent shot at a healthy and successful life.
Building and leading an organization dedicated to intervening early and effec-
tively in the lives of poor families with young children provided an education of
a different kind. I quickly realized that the reason good services weren’t widely
available to these families was that only a small portion of government funding
for services to children and families was aimed toward young children. Most of
the funding was—╉and still is—╉absorbed by programs and services grappling with
the learning and behavior problems, the mental health problems, and the juvenile
crime that result when the needs of vulnerable young children and their families go
unmet. It took a great deal of persistence and creativity to find and access funding
to respond to some of these early life needs. And once we did access funding, the
programs we offered to poor families with young children were routinely placed on
╇ 5
Introduction╇↜渀屮 ╇↜渀屮5
the chopping block whenever the state or federal government was looking to cut
back on outlays for human services—╉even when these programs showed promise
in reducing risk for school failure, child maltreatment, and other rotten outcomes.
Sadly, despite increased national attention focused on the importance of what hap-
pens in early childhood, this is a scenario known only too well by today’s leaders of
organizations focused on improving the life chances of young children in poverty.
Despite these challenges, the agency I started grew, eventually merging, in the
mid-╉1990s, with Children’s Friend and Service, Rhode Island’s longest standing
child-╉service organization and one of the oldest in the nation. We christened the
consolidated agency “Children’s Friend” and began linking and combining pro-
grams in order to offer well-╉coordinated, comprehensive services to highly vul-
nerable families with young children in the Greater Providence area. Although
deeply gratifying, this work was also very frustrating, in part because of the
fragile nature of the grants and contracts we cobbled together to create those
services. Even more frustrating was seeing that the needs of so many of the fami-
lies we served typically went far beyond the counseling, home visits, child care,
and other services Children’s Friend offered. On a daily basis we saw families af-
fected by homelessness, community violence, substance abuse, and other major
mental health problems; parents with educational deficits; children poisoned by
lead paint; and many other hardships. Unfortunately, resources to address these
and other needs of poor families with young children were perpetually in short
supply in the communities that most needed them.
I served as Children’s Friend’s director until leaving in 2007 to focus more at-
tention on the policy arena, something my current position as a college profes-
sor enables me to do. Many years on the front lines of addressing the needs of
highly vulnerable families has deepened my understanding of the problems faced
by these families as structural problems, perpetuated by ineffective policies and
programs that make breaking poverty’s cycle nearly impossible. I have also come
to see how little the public really knows and understands about the complex fac-
tors that cause and sustain our nation’s stubbornly high rates of poverty, and child
poverty in particular. Most Americans hear little about poverty, and what they do
hear typically disparages poor parents, such as when one of these parents is caught
trading food stamps for drugs or collecting benefits beyond those for which his or
her family qualifies.
Few Americans realize the extent to which early life poverty plays a role in put-
ting youths like those I just described on a pathway toward needing an alternative
6
Introduction╇↜渀屮 ╇↜渀屮7
them in a way that helps a broad range of readers understand one of most impor-
tant public policy problems we face. In doing so, it is not my intention to place
a disproportionate amount of blame for our nation’s failure to substantially
reduce poverty upon the shoulders of voters and elected officials from either
major party or ideology. While conservatives are more likely to perpetuate nega-
tive stereotypes of impoverished families and advocate for reducing spending on
these families, progressives often stand in the way of meaningful progress by
protecting inadequate and ineffective programs and by perpetuating the myth
that intergenerational poverty can be solved by simple and cheap solutions. All of
these tendencies contribute to maintaining high rates of poverty for millions of
children and their families.
The purpose of this book is to help readers deepen their understanding of five
important aspects of this topic:
1. Why the U.S. poverty rate remains stubbornly high, and is the highest
among similarly developed but less-╉wealthy nations
2. The devastating consequences of our poverty rates being highest among
children under six years of age
3. The many ways in which our responses to family poverty harm children
and help maintain poverty’s cycle
4. How the programs and policies currently in place are too weak and
ineffective to make a real and lasting difference
5. What it would really take—╉from both a policy and programmatic
standpoint—╉to substantially improve the life chances of children born
to poor parents.
My aim is to help readers connect the dots between our failed programmatic
and policy approaches to poverty, our ineffective child-and-╉family-╉serving sys-
tems, and the harsh rhetoric and unfair reporting that drives much of the dis-
course on family poverty. I write not to present original research or to inform
other academics about the many ways in which poverty harms the development
and dims the life chances of young children; there are plenty such books already
published, several of them collections of excellent chapters, each distilling the
findings of researchers in the various siloes that address this topic. Instead, my
purpose is to help concerned individuals make sense of the onslaught of informa-
tion bubbling up from research in fields as diverse as neuroscience, economics,
8
Introduction╇↜渀屮 ╇↜渀屮9
begin to make real progress toward solving this problem. It is toward this end
that I have written this book.
The next chapter sets the context for our discussion. It provides a brief per-
spective on poverty in the United States and summarizes efforts over the past
fifty years to improve the life chances of poor children. It includes informa-
tion on the scope of the problem and who is most affected, as well as how this
country’s poverty rates compare with those of other, similarly developed na-
tions. I also discuss how economic factors and racism intersect in ways that
perpetuate higher rates of impoverishment among blacks and certain other
racial groups. I address three areas of widespread misunderstanding that un-
derlie our current antipoverty policies: that we can punish poor parents into
self-╉sufficiency; that government does too much to help poor families, and
that our public schools can undo the harm inflicted upon young children born
into poor families.
Chapter 3 traces the national discourse of shaming and blaming poor par-
ents, from Ronald Reagan’s “welfare queens” to the inflammatory rhetoric used
by present-╉day politicians and commentators. I provide examples of how news
reports often sensationalize relatively small instances of welfare cheating and
how often-╉harsh public discourse has made low-╉income parents one of the last
safe targets for ridicule in the public arena. This chapter also highlights the
disconnect between what most Americans believe about government assis-
tance to poor families and the diminished and fragmented resources that are
actually available, especially since the passage of welfare reform legislation in
1996. I examine the impacts of government policies on poor families since then
and illustrate the ways in which the safety net continues to fray, with often-╉
catastrophic consequences for young children in families stuck at the bottom
of our economy.
In Chapter 4, I examine those consequences. I explain how the stress and ne-
glect of being raised in poverty can harm young children’s learning ability and
emotional stability. Drawing on research that demonstrates that much of the
physical structure of the human brain is developed in the first few years of life,
I show how adversity in children’s earliest years can interfere with the physi-
cal “wiring” of the brain and can affect lifelong capacities for learning, as well
as physical and mental health. This chapter exposes many of the other ways in
which living in poverty harms children, and young children in particular. I exam-
ine findings from public health research showing that America’s poorest children
10
Introduction 11
In the eighth and final chapter, I call for a carefully crafted, comprehensive
policy strategy for ensuring that far fewer American children experience the
lousy outcomes that are caused by and that perpetuate intergenerational pov-
erty. This strategy would address the economic factors that keep families stuck
in poverty’s clutches, while at the same time fostering the development of stron-
ger, more effective programmatic approaches for helping poor families succeed.
It would include ensuring that work pays and that supports are available to fami-
lies headed by low-wage–earning parents, as well as restoring and improving the
safety net for our most fragile families. I emphasize the importance of reforming
systems, including the child welfare, immigration, and criminal justice systems,
that play a significant role in perpetuating disadvantage. In closing, I call for a
national movement to end child poverty and cite the successes and the challenges
encountered as Great Britain mounted such a campaign and cut its child poverty
by half over a ten-year period.
My most fervent hope is that once you have walked this journey with me, you
will have a deeper understanding of the many factors that conspire to maintain
intergenerational poverty in the United States, key reasons why we haven’t made
deeper inroads into solving this problem, and promising strategies for achiev-
ing much better results than have been realized by the programs and policies of
the past.
12
Fift y y ea rs ago, Americans and their leaders set out to right the gross injustice
of widespread poverty in the world’s richest country. As Attorney General Robert
Kennedy, trailed by television cameras and newspaper reporters, toured parts
of Appalachia and the South in the mid-1960s, much of the nation was horrified
by the large numbers of impoverished individuals and families and the degree
of deprivation Kennedy found. Thousands of families were living with little to
no income, and going hungry was a fact of life. What most outraged Kennedy
and average citizens, however, were the photographs and television footage of
young children who were malnourished and living in substandard housing, many
of them diseased, and facing a bleak future similar to that of their parents. These
images played a significant role in rallying the nation to support the expansion
of a wide variety of antipoverty programs, including the reauthorization of the
Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, which had been signed into law by President
Lyndon Johnson and became known as the War on Poverty.
The fact that many of the impoverished children and families shown in print
and television images were African American in places like Mississippi, where
agricultural jobs had dried up and meager aid programs such as food stamps were
doled out at the discretion of white bureaucrats, demonstrated racial segregation
12
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
much how to cure cancer—so much can, and is being constantly
done by one method or another—but how to educate people so that
we can get hold of cancer early. The problem is one of diagnosis,
and is therefore to be solved by education and courage, not by
hesitation and fear.
No statement of the cancer problem would be complete without
some mention of two methods of treatment which have recently
come much to the fore: namely, the use of X-rays and of radium.
To give any really useful account of these is very difficult, as no
really satisfactory groups of cases have been published, and one
can only speak from one’s own experience and that of colleagues
who have been working with them.
The action of both these methods of treatment is in essence the
same. It has been found that X-rays and radium have the power of
destroying living tissue when such is exposed to their action for
varying lengths of time. Fortunately, cancerous tissue is destroyed
before normal healthy tissue, and it is the aim of the treatment to
expose the growth to that dosage of rays which will kill the malignant
tissue but just fall short of doing harm to the normal tissue.
Sometimes this is more easily done with X-rays and sometimes with
radium; it all depends on the position of the growth. This all sounds
very attractive, and one would think that, on the surface of things,
with such a weapon at our disposal, every case could easily be
efficiently dealt with. But, like many other superficially attractive
things, it is found on further examination to have its drawbacks.
Although a proper dose of X-rays will kill cancer tissue, a smaller
dose will stimulate it to further action. Further, these rays have,
comparatively speaking, a very low penetrating power. They are
absorbed and rendered inactive by thin layers of metal, of skin or of
other tissue.
Now, as has already been explained, a malignant growth, as well
as extending superficially, tends to spread very deeply and also to
involve neighbouring structures, and when X-rays or radium are
applied to it, we find that in some cases it will deal with the more
superficial parts of the growth but leave the deeper parts untouched,
or even more active than before. All kinds of methods have been
tried to get over this, such as burying radium in the substance of the
growth, and using very big doses, applied to various aspects of the
growth, but, so far, although there have been some very encouraging
results, the problem has not been solved.
As has been said, it is extremely difficult to estimate the exact
value of this treatment, as no figures are of any value till seven years
at least have elapsed after treatment, and no such figures have been
published. There can be no doubt, however, that an occasional case
has been cured, but it is the experience of all that the results of
radium treatment do not approximate in any way to the percentage
of cures obtained by surgery, even in those types of cancer which
react best to X-rays or radium.
Dr Knox, of the Cancer Hospital, London, who has had much
experience of high tension X-rays, says that the treatment of
malignant disease by X-rays has not yet reached that stage where it
ought to be given to any operable case instead of an operation. I
think this opinion may be regarded as an authoritative statement of
the situation as it is at present.
This is not all, however; X-rays and radium have a very important
place in the treatment of cancer, and as far as we can see at
present, the future hope lies in a judicious combination of one or the
other of these with surgery, for early operable cases, and their
prolonged and intensive use in those advanced cases which cannot
be removed by other means. A few advanced cases have even been
rendered operable by this means.
In combination with surgery this method has its very greatest use
in the prevention of superficial recurrences. In every operation, in
spite of the greatest care, it is impossible to avoid the setting free
into the tissues of a few cancer cells which may grow later into a
recurrence. Post-operative radiation bids fair to abolish this type of
recurrence, which formerly accounted for a good percentage of all
recurrences.
From time to time many methods have been brought forward
which have for a little while promised well, but so far none of them
has produced results in any way comparable with those obtained by
complete removal of the growth by surgical means.
I have not dealt with these in any detail here because, whether
ultimately we use drugs, surgery, violet leaves or any of the recently
popularised methods of “taking thought” to cure the disease, the
main point of my thesis will still hold good, and that is, that by far the
most important factor in the cure of the disease is that of early
diagnosis. This lies in the hands of the public far more than in those
of the medical profession. If the public want early diagnosis they will
get it, when they insist on it, just as they get anything else they insist
on, from self-government to prohibition, no matter how good or bad it
may be for them.
Briefly stated, most cases of early cancer are curable, and the
diagnosis of early cancer is only to be made by looking instead of
waiting. On these facts, certain constructive proposals can be based.
They are so simple that they are not likely to be heeded for some
time to come, for the public has always preferred Abana and
Pharpar, rivers of Damascus, to washing in Jordan, and I suppose
always will do, till we reach a more enlightened age.
Nevertheless I believe it is true, and without exaggeration, to say
that about ninety per cent. of all cases could be cured or prevented if
the following statements were accepted.
If all persons over forty years of age were routinely examined once
every six months to see that they had not cancer, or a precancerous
condition, and if these when found were promptly dealt with, then
cancers of the rectum, tongue, lip, breast, skin and uterus would
cease to be the plagues they are at present.
Similarly, if every patient who had taken more than a pound of
bismuth to relieve gastric pain were routinely explored to see that
cancer or gastric ulcer did not exist, the large majority of growths in
this region would be either prevented or cured. Similar rules can
easily be devised to deal with cancers arising in other parts. What is
wanted is a change of attitude on the part of everyone concerned.
After all, a fortnight in bed, with forty-eight hours of discomfort, is not
too great a price to pay for freedom from this disease, and, with
proper examination, even this would be unnecessary in most cases.
Every intelligent person is aware that, in order to ensure freedom
from dental disease, it is necessary to have his teeth examined
every six months, and to have small lesions dealt with in their very
early stages. All have come to this conclusion because they know
that neglected dental disease means pain; and they now look to see
that their teeth are normal, instead of waiting for a toothache to
come. It is true that there are still some of our weaker brethren who
still wait till they get toothache before they visit the dentist; and for
them there is nothing to be done. In the same way, if we wait for the
advanced signs of cancer to develop, the position with regard to its
cure will remain approximately what it is to-day.
The education of the public up to this pitch is by no means an
impracticable proposal. The position with regard to appendicitis is
very much the same as that of cancer. What has been done in the
case of appendicitis? The mortality is in proportion to the number of
hours during which the disease has existed. Twenty years ago
appendicitis was responsible for a large number of deaths. During
1919 and 1920 there was, in a large London General Hospital, only
one death from appendicitis, and yet there were at least 5 cases
dealt with every week. This improvement is entirely the result of
education of the public and their doctors. They know that to be cured
operation must be early, and so we no longer wait to see whether the
patient is going to die; if we suspect it, we look and see whether it is
present or not. True, we remove unnecessarily a fair number of
appendixes but, by so doing, we purchase, for a much larger number
of people, immunity from death by this disease. When exactly the
same principle is applied to cancer we shall be in a position to be a
great deal more satisfied than we are at present.
One of the most successful ways of treating a patient with fixed
ideas is by the use of explanation combined with strong counter-
suggestion. This is the method of psycho-analysis and hypnotism.
No patient is more susceptible to this kind of treatment than that
capricious lady, Public Opinion. If we want to realise the ideals put
forward in the early part of this essay, we must mobilise all our
resources: the Press; the Platform; the Consulting Room: for a
prolonged and intensive campaign against this black spot on our
civilization.
TO-DAY AND TO-MORROW
DAEDALUS: or Science and the Future
By J. B. S. Haldane. 5th imp.
ICARUS: or The Future of Science
By Hon. Bertrand Russell, F.R.S. 3rd imp.
THE MONGOL IN OUR MIDST
By F. G. Crookshank, M.D.
WIRELESS POSSIBILITIES
By Prof. A. M. Low
NARCISSUS: or The Anatomy of Clothes
By Gerald Heard
TANTALUS: or The Future of Man
By Dr F. C. S. Schiller
THE PASSING OF THE PHANTOMS
By Prof. C. J. Patten
PERSEUS: of Dragons
By H. F. Scott Stokes
LYSISTRATA: Woman’s Future and Future Woman
By A. M. Ludovici
CALLINICUS: a Defence of Chemical Warfare
By J. B. S. Haldane
QUO VADIMUS?: Glimpses of the Future
By E. E. Fournier d’Albe
THE CONQUEST OF CANCER
By H. W. S. Wright, M.S., F.R.C.S.
WHAT I BELIEVE
By Hon. Bertrand Russell, F.R.S.
THE FUTURE OF SEX
By Rebecca West
THE EVOCATION OF GENIUS
By Alan Porter
HYPATIA; or Woman and Knowledge
By Dora Russell (Hon. Mrs Bertrand Russell)
ÆSCULAPIUS: or Disease and The Man
By F. G. Crookshank, M.D.
Transcriber’s Notes:
Punctuation and spelling inaccuracies were silently
corrected.
Archaic and variable spelling has been preserved.
Variations in hyphenation and compound words have been
preserved.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE
CONQUEST OF CANCER ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.