Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Fatigue Design of Marine Structures Inge Lotsberg Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Fatigue Design of Marine Structures Inge Lotsberg Ebook All Chapter PDF
Inge Lotsberg
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/fatigue-design-of-marine-structures-inge-lotsberg/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/design-of-marine-facilities-
engineering-for-port-and-harbor-structures-john-w-gaythwaite/
https://textbookfull.com/product/unified-design-of-steel-
structures-carter/
Ultimate Limit State Design of Steel-Plated Structures.
Paik
https://textbookfull.com/product/ultimate-limit-state-design-of-
steel-plated-structures-paik/
https://textbookfull.com/product/design-and-analysis-of-tall-and-
complex-structures-feng-fu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/aero-engine-combustor-casing-
experimental-design-and-fatigue-studies-1st-edition-sashi-kanta-
panigrahi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/analysis-and-design-of-
geotechnical-structures-1st-edition-manuel-matos-fernandes/
https://textbookfull.com/product/fatigue-and-fracture-of-
nanostructured-materials-pasquale-cavaliere/
FATIGUE DESIGN OF MARINE STRUCTURES
Inge Lotsberg
DNV GL, Norway
32 Avenue of the Americas, New York NY 10013
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107121331
C Inge Lotsberg 2016
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
I.1 History of Fatigue 1
I.2 Examples of Fatigue Failures of Marine Structures 9
I.2.1 The Alexander L. Kielland Accident 9
I.2.2 Fatigue and Fracture of a Mooring Chain 11
I.2.3 Fatigue Cracking in Ship Side of a Shuttle Tanker 11
I.3 Types of Marine Structures 13
I.4 Design Methodology for Marine Structures 13
I.5 Overview of Fatigue Analysis Examples in This Book 17
v
vi Contents
2.1.5 Instrumentation 30
2.1.6 Test Frequency 31
2.1.7 Measurements and Documentation of Test Data 32
2.1.8 Assessment of Test Data 32
2.2 Butt Welds in Piles 32
2.2.1 Material Data and Fabrication of Test Specimens 33
2.2.2 Measured Residual Stresses 36
2.2.3 Assessment of the Test Data 37
2.3 Details in Ship Structures 39
2.3.1 Fatigue Testing 39
2.3.2 Geometry and Fabrication of Specimens 43
2.3.3 Additional Test Results for Model 4 43
2.3.4 Additional Test Results for Model 5 44
2.3.5 Effect of Stress Gradient at Weld Toe 45
2.3.6 Hot Spot Stress for the Tested Specimens 48
2.4 Side Longitudinals in Ships 52
2.4.1 Test Arrangement 54
2.4.2 Instrumentation 55
2.4.3 Testing 56
2.4.4 Assessment of Fatigue Test Data 57
2.4.5 Comparison of Calculated Stress by Finite Element
Analysis and Measured Data 60
2.5 Fillet Welded Connections 61
2.5.1 Fillet Welds Subjected to Axial Load 61
2.5.2 Fillet Welded Tubular Members Subjected to Combined
Axial and Shear Load 64
2.5.3 Correction of Test Data for Measured Misalignment 66
2.5.4 Assessment of Test Data 69
2.5.5 Comparison of Design Equations with Test Data for
Combined Loading 72
2.6 Doubling Plates or Cover Plates 74
2.6.1 Background 74
2.6.2 Test Program and Preparation of Test Specimens 75
2.6.3 Fatigue Testing 77
2.6.4 Assessment of Test Data 82
2.7 Effect of Stress Direction Relative to Weld Toe 84
2.7.1 Constant Stress Direction 84
2.7.2 Fatigue Test Data 84
2.7.3 Design Procedures in Different Design Standards 85
2.7.4 Comparison of Design Procedures with Fatigue Test Data 88
2.7.5 Varying Stress Direction during a Load Cycle 94
3.1.4
Relationship between Elastic Strain and Nonlinear
Elastic Strain 101
3.1.5 Notch Sensitivity and Fatigue Strength of Notched
Specimens 106
3.1.6 Combination of Fatigue Damage from Low Cycle and
High Cycle Fatigue 106
3.2 Methodology for Assessment of High Cycle Fatigue 107
3.2.1 Calculation of Stresses and Relation to Different S-N
Curves 107
3.2.2 Guidance Regarding When Detailed Fatigue Analysis Is
Required 112
3.2.3 Fatigue Damage Accumulation – Palmgren-Miner Rule 114
3.3 Residual Stresses 116
3.3.1 Residual Stresses due to Fabrication 116
3.3.2 Shakedown of Residual Stresses 116
3.3.3 Mean Stress Reduction Factor for Base Material 118
3.3.4 Residual Stress in Shell Plates in Tubular Towers after
Cold Forming 118
3.3.5 Mean Stress Reduction Factor for Post-Weld
Heat-Treated Welds 120
3.3.6 Mean Stress Reduction Factor for Inspection Planning
for Fatigue Cracks in As-Welded Structures 120
11 Fabrication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
11.1 General 327
11.2 Selection of Material 327
11.3 Welding 328
11.4 Defects 329
11.5 Fabrication Tolerances 330
11.6 Non-Destructive Testing for Defects 331
11.6.1 General 331
11.6.2 Visual Inspection 333
11.6.3 Probability of Detection by Visual Inspection 333
11.6.4 Magnetic Particle Inspection 333
11.6.5 Penetrant Testing 334
11.6.6 Ultrasonic Testing 334
11.6.7 Probability of Detection for Ultrasonic Testing 336
11.6.8 Radiographic Testing 336
11.6.9 Eddy Current 336
11.6.10 Alternating Current Field Measurement and
Alternating Current Potential Drop Methods 337
11.6.11 Probability of Detection Curves for EC, MPI, and
ACFM 337
11.6.12 Methodology to Provide Reliable PoD Curves for
Other Inspection Methods 338
11.7 Improvement Methods 339
11.7.1 General 339
11.7.2 Weld Profiling by Machining and Grinding 340
11.7.3 Weld Toe Grinding 342
11.7.4 Workmanship 343
11.7.5 Example of Effect of Grinding a Weld 344
11.7.6 TIG Dressing 345
11.7.7 Hammer Peening 345
11.7.8 High-Frequency Mechanical Impact Treatment 347
11.7.9 Post-Weld Heat Treatment 347
11.7.10 Extended Fatigue Life 348
11.7.11 Stop Holes 348
Contents xiii
References 499
Index 521
Preface
This book is intended to act as a guide for students and practicing engineers for
fatigue design of dynamically loaded marine structures. Fatigue of structures is a
broad and complex area that requires more background than can be included in
design standards. Many papers on fatigue of structures are published each year, and
different design approaches have also been issued. However, due to the nature of
the fatigue phenomena and scatter in test results, it may be difficult for engineers to
obtain a good overview of what is found to be a good recommended fatigue assess-
ment methodology.
The purpose of this book is not to give a complete overview of different design
approaches, but rather to provide the reader with a sound background for the most
common recommendations in design standards for fatigue assessment of marine
structures. The content of this book is colored by the experiences by the author,
and it may be relevant to consider this textbook in relation to the Standards with
which the author has been most heavily involved, including the Recommended Prac-
tice DNVGL-RP-C203 Fatigue Design of Offshore Structures and DNV-RP-C206
Fatigue Methodology of Offshore Ships. However, similar content can also be found
in a number of other design standards, such as: ISO 19902 (2007), API RP2A (2014),
AWS (2010), BS 7608 (2014), Eurocode 3 (EN 1993–1–9, 2009), and IIW (Hobbacher,
2009). Thus, this book might best be considered as providing background for fatigue
assessment of welded structures on a broad basis.
Based on the author’s main background experience, a number of DNVGL stan-
dards are referenced. As these documents can be downloaded for free from the Inter-
net, they are also useful reference documents for students studying fatigue of marine
structures.
Much of this book is related to fatigue capacity of steel structures. The book
may be seen as complementary to the Naess and Moan’s book, Stochastic Dynamics
of Marine Structures. Thus mainly the fatigue capacity of marine structures is con-
sidered in this book. The dynamic loading may be due to different sources such as
waves, wind, rotors on wind turbines, dynamic response, vortex-induced vibrations,
pile driving, and loading and unloading of content. Although this book will be easier
to read and understand if the reader has a sound background in structural mechanics,
the derivation of equations and the examples are presented in sufficient detail that it
should be also possible to understand for engineers whose background is not rooted
xvii
xviii Preface
in structural engineering. A number of relevant examples are also included for the
purpose of education of students.
A number of other test books on fatigue are recommended for a more basic
learning about fatigue. Rather than repeating content that has already been well pre-
sented elsewhere, the author concentrates on engineering practice based on his own
experiences in this book. Other textbooks on fatigue include (listed in alphabeti-
cal order by the author): Almar-Naess (1985), Collins (1993), Dowling (1998), Fis-
cher (1984), Forrest (1962), Gurney (1979), Gurney (2006), Haibach (2006), Lassen
and Recho (2006), Macdonald (2011), Maddox (1991), Marshall (1992), Nussbaumer
et al. (2011), Pilkey (1997), Radaj et al. (2006), Radaj and Vormwald (2013), Schijve
(2009), Sines and Waisman (1959), Sors (1971), Stephens et al. (2001), and Warde-
nier (1982). Books related to fatigue based on fracture mechanics include: Anderson
(2005), Broek (1986), Carlsson (1976), Hellan (1984), Knott (1973), Liebowitz (1968),
and Taylor (2007).
Although our understanding of the fatigue phenomena has improved over time,
the assessment procedures are still strongly related to laboratory fatigue test data.
Therefore, some of the author’s experiences related to laboratory testing are included
in the first section of this book. Careful review of these sections will enable the reader
to obtain a better understanding of the remaining part of the book.
Most of the terminology used in this book is defined at first use, and the index
may be useful in this respect. Some expressions are used more frequently than oth-
ers; one example is the term “fatigue strength,” which can be defined as magni-
tude of stress range leading to a particular fatigue life. Fatigue life or the number
of cycles to a failure under the action of a constant amplitude stress history may
also be denoted “fatigue endurance.” A “fatigue strength curve” or “S-N curve” is
defined as the quantitative relationship between the stress range (S) and the num-
ber of stress cycles to fatigue failure (N), used for fatigue assessment of a particular
category of structural detail. Thus, the expression “fatigue strength” needs to be asso-
ciated with some number of cycles to be fully meaningful. The same comment may
be made with respect to expressions as “fatigue resistance” used in some design stan-
dards and “fatigue capacity” used by designers to characterize the resistance against
fatigue failure in structures. Thus also these expressions may be interpreted as resis-
tance or capacity in relation to an S-N curve. Both the term “fatigue strength” and
“fatigue capacity” are used in this book to characterize resistance against fatigue.
Normally the word “capacity” may be considered to be more general than “strength”
and include more influencing parameters when comparing this also with other fail-
ure modes than fatigue for structures. For example, the wording “fatigue strength”
is used to describe the resistance to fatigue failure in a single fatigue test or of, for
example, a single bolt, and “fatigue capacity” is used to describe the fatigue resistance
of a bolted connection where the fatigue capacity is dependent on more parameters
such as surface conditions of plates, friction coefficient, and pretension of the bolts.
In some literature the S-N curves are also denoted as Wöhler curves.
See Sections I.4 and 4.11.1 for definition of characteristic and design S-N curves.
When the accumulated number of cycles is divided by a reference value, such as the
characteristic number of cycles to failure as derived from an S-N curve, the wording
“fatigue damage” is used. Fatigue damage accumulates with time when a structure
is subjected to dynamic loading. Fatigue endurance is similar to fatigue life, which
Preface xix
may be measured often in terms of years. Fatigue endurance can be observed during
laboratory fatigue tests or can be calculated based on a defined design procedure. The
calculated values normally differ from fatigue test data or observed values; therefore,
the term “calculated” is often inserted in front of fatigue life in order to make this
difference more clear.
In design standards for offshore structures the notation SCF is used for a lin-
ear elastic stress concentration factor (see Section 3.2.1 and Chapter 8). In design
standards for sailing ships K is used as notation for the same stress concentration
factor; see, for example, the IACS common rules from 2013. In this book SCF is
used as notation for stress concentration factor, and it should not be mixed with the
stress intensity factor used in fracture mechanics analysis that is denoted by K – see
Section 16.2.
Some items are presented in more than one section of the book. However, where
this occurs, cross-referencing has been used to improve readability.
Acknowledgments
I have worked at the head office of Det Norske Veritas (DNV) in Oslo during the
1979–2013 period and have been working at DNV GL since the merger between
DNV and the former German classification company Germanische Lloyd (GL) in
2013. A significant proportion of the work within DNV GL is related to assessment of
marine structures. This has given me the possibility of meeting several experienced
engineers in different industries. I have had the pleasure of working together with
engineers within material technology, fracture mechanics, laboratory testing, relia-
bility analysis, and structural analysis and I would like to acknowledge this support
from my colleagues.
During the work with this book I have received valuable input and comments
by a number of persons, which is acknowledged. Hege Bang and Arne Fjeldstad
have reviewed the proposed text and provided useful comments. Knut Olav Ronold
has provided valuable input and comments to the section on derivation of design
S-N curves from fatigue test data. Andrzej Serednicki, Arne Eikebrokk, and Veb-
jørn Andresen have provided useful input to the section on bolted connections. I
also acknowledge comments by Professor Torgeir Moan, Professor Stig Berge, and
Professor Sigmund Kyrre Aas at the Norwegian University of Science & Technol-
ogy NTNU Trondheim regarding the technical content of this book. István Szarka
helped me establish a template for writing. Harald Rove has prepared the most com-
plex sketches, and Lucy Robertson has polished my language in most parts of this
book. I would also like to mention that I have received great help from our library
to provide me with most of the literature I have asked for; special thanks to Ingunn
Lindvik in this respect. I would also like to acknowledge DNV GL for allowing me to
publish background material for our design standards that have been developed in a
number of different research and development projects. Furthermore, I acknowledge
the financial support from DNV GL for writing this book.
I received my technical education at the Technical University of Trondheim,
from which I earned a PhD in 1977. The research was related to the use of finite
element analysis within the field of fracture mechanics. I am grateful for the
support from the university during my study and the encouragement to publish
my research from my supervisor, Professor Pål G. Bergan at the Department of
xxi
xxii Acknowledgments
1
2 Introduction
linear abscissa and ordinate. In 1910, an American named Basquin plotted the same
data into a log-log format, in the same way as S-N curves are presented in fatigue
design standards today.
At this time constant fatigue life diagrams were also developed in which the
effect of static loading (maximum stress or stress ratio) was included in addition
to the stress range, as this parameter was necessary for inclusion in bridge design.
The first constant fatigue life diagram was published by Gerber in 1874, based on
an assessment of Wöhler’s test data. Other diagrams provided in the literature are
derived from, for example, Smith in 1880, Goodman in 1899, and Haigh in 1917, in
which relationships between stress amplitude and mean stress were presented. A
more conservative diagram referred to in the literature for this is from Soderberg in
1930 (Sendeckyj 2001).
Fatigue failures in aircrafts from the late 1920s resulted in research to investigate
representative long-term loading and fatigue capacity of aircraft structural compo-
nents. Component testing became part of the qualification procedure for new ele-
ments. After World War II, it had become common practice to perform testing of
large components of aircrafts in fatigue as opposed to small-scale test data. How-
ever, failures continued to occur, resulting, for example, in the Comet crashes in 1954.
These accidents were later found to be due to unsatisfactory detailing of the corners
of the windows in combination with an erroneous test procedure that had provided
compressive residual stresses at the hot spot areas, such that the actual capacity dif-
fered from that of the laboratory test component. This fact does not only demon-
strate the importance of a good detailed design in order to achieve sufficient fatigue
capacity but also shows the need for performing realistic component testing in the
laboratory. It is important that the structural geometry of the component and the
fabrication are representative for the actual structure in terms of boundary condi-
tions and loading. It was also realized after the failures of the Comet airplanes that
these structures were not fail-safe (Edwards 1988). After these accidents, the require-
ments for component testing in the aircraft industry were improved. It should also
be mentioned that a high-strength aluminum alloy had been used in the Comet air-
planes, and it is known that the fatigue strength of a material does not necessarily
correspond with the material strength. Fatigue crack initiation in the base material
is considered to be improved, see Section 4.1.5, while crack growth parameters are
considered to be rather constant with increasing material tensile strength, see also
Section 16.11. The crack growth parameter is considered to be more a function of
the Young’ s modulus of the material used than of the material strength. Furthermore
aircraft accidents from the late 1960s led to the development of enhanced research
programs on fatigue strength based on fracture mechanics. A near-fatal accident with
a Boeing 737 in 1988 resulted in the initiation of investigative activities regarding the
structural integrity of old and poorly maintained aircrafts.
Professor Bauschinger of the Technical University of Munich had already in 1881
observed that the elastic limit of materials changes under repeated stress cycles. This
was also the basis for the hypothesis by Manson and Coffin in the 1950s, which is
still used for assessment of low cycle fatigue (Manson 1954; Coffin 1954, 1984). Low
cycle fatigue is defined as stress ranges leading to repeated plastic strain during load-
ing and unloading, such that elastic shakedown does not occur during a load cycle.
Shakedown is understood to mean that the material has elastic behavior after it has
yielded during large load amplitude; see also Section 3.3.2.
I.1 History of Fatigue 3
Manson and Coffin described the behavior of materials under cyclic inelas-
tic strain amplitudes by a four-parameter formula, creating a new field of activity
called “low-cycle-fatigue” (LCF) that is further described in Section 3.1. In 1903, two
Englishmen, Ewing and Humfrey, described the so-called slip band on the surface
of rotating bending specimens. Later, in the 1930s, Polany and Orowan presented
the dislocation theory, and this became the basis for many metallurgical papers on
fatigue of metals. Orowan suggested that fatigue initiation is a process of cyclic shear
hardening that, after depletion of the local ductility, leads to fatigue cracking. The
effect of notches on the fatigue capacity of structural components was known before
Wöhler performed his work. He thus recommended special fatigue tests for sharply
notched specimens. In 1898, Kirch calculated that the elastic stress concentration fac-
tor for a hole in an infinite body was equal to 3.0. Analytical derivation of stress
concentration factors at notches in machine components were derived by advanced
mathematics combined with linear elastic theory of solids; an overview of stress con-
centrations around holes was presented by Johnson (1961). Measurements of stress
concentrations were achieved by photo-elasticity from around 1930, and around 1970
it became normal practice to analyze stress concentrations in detail by the finite ele-
ment method that had been developed during the 1960s.
In 1937, Neuber published the first comprehensive book on the theoretical calcu-
lation of the stress concentration factor Kt and also the fatigue notch concentration
factor Kf . The German Thurm had previously observed in experiments that notched
specimens showed a longer fatigue life than was predicted by the theoretical elas-
tic stress concentration factor; the difference between these factors increases with
increased notch effect, or with a reduced radius at the region showing the largest
stress. This difference was also found to be material-dependent and the effect was
described by a notch sensitivity factor that is dependent on both material and notch
radius. Neuber’s book was written in German but was translated into English in
1946, and some of Neuber’s work is included in Peterson’s Stress Concentration Fac-
tors from 1953, which is a renowned book for everyone who works with fatigue of
machine components. This book is still recommended for background on the notch
effect and notch sensitivity, and for an explanation of elastic stress concentration
factors as compared with fatigue notch concentration factors. In the early 1950s, the
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) made an attempt to trans-
form the calculation of the fatigue stress concentration factor, Kt , into engineering
practice, based on Neuber’s material constant. However, the results were found to
be of insufficient accuracy and the experimental effort required was too great. Thus,
the concept of notch sensitivity is considered to be of limited use for detailed calcu-
lations today. Nevertheless, it is useful for a more qualitative understanding of the
physical fatigue behavior of notched specimens.
After the 1980s a notch stress method based on a linear elastic finite element
analysis has been developed, Radaj (1996) and Radaj et al. (2006). This approach has
been linked to a notch stress S-N curve and is frequently being used by researchers
and also by the industry in more special cases. A more detailed background for this
methodology is presented in Section 9.6.
Fatigue tests are normally performed under a constant amplitude loading. How-
ever, many dynamically loaded structures are subject to variable amplitude load-
ing. Therefore, different test spectra representing long-term dynamic loading were
developed for fatigue assessment in the automobile industry, the aircraft industry,
4 Introduction
and, later, in the offshore industry. Reference is made to Section 10.2 for an example
of transformation of a long-term stress range distribution into a constant amplitude
loading.
Most marine structures are subject to variable amplitude loading, and this is
also the load condition for many other structures, such as components in aircrafts,
automobiles, and cranes, among others. In addition to requiring load spectra that
are representative for long-term cyclic loading, criteria must be defined regarding
how to compute fatigue damage under variable amplitude loading. In 1924, Palm-
gren, a Swede, published a paper (in German) on the lifetime of ball supports. This
paper included not only a fatigue damage hypothesis for variable amplitude load-
ing but also a numerical description of a probability of survival for fatigue-loaded
ball bearings. An identical damage-accumulation hypothesis was presented in 1937
by Langer, an American who was probably not aware of Palmgren’s work. He sepa-
rated fatigue into fatigue crack initiation and fatigue crack growth, and suggested a
damage sum equaling 1.0 for each of these phases. The linear fatigue damage accu-
mulation hypothesis was presented again in 1945 by Miner, and he also performed
some testing to check out his hypothesis. This linear damage accumulation has since
been named the Palmgren-Miner rule. This is further assessed in Section 3.2.3.
The accuracy of the fatigue damage hypothesis is also linked to how the design
S-N curve is established. Fatigue testing under spectrum loading is needed in order
to determine the shape of the S-N curve in the high cycle region at the fatigue limit as
the number of cycles beyond the fatigue limit becomes “infinite” or very long if the
stress range in constant amplitude tests is less than the stress range that corresponds
to the fatigue limit. Such test results are also denoted as “run-outs”; see also Section
3.2.2. Fatigue testing relevant for design of steel structures under spectrum loading
has been performed since the 1980s as described in Section 3.2.3. The uncertainty
related to variable amplitude loading is also assessed in Chapter 12. This issue is still
being debated, and different recommendations on the position of the fatigue limit
and change in slope in the S-N curves are found in different design standards (e.g.,
EN 1993–1–9:2009, ISO 19902 (2007), and BS 7608 (2014)).
It has been a challenge to develop a counting method for cycles and stress ranges
that represents the physical behavior of a fatigue damaging process in a reliable man-
ner. Several proposals for counting methods have been presented in the literature;
seven different methods for cycle counting were described in a paper by Schijve in
1961 (Schijve 2009). He was closely involved in assessment and testing of compo-
nents under variable amplitude loading, and considered that the rainflow counting
method, published by the Japanese Matsuishi and Endo in 1968, fulfills the require-
ments of an acceptable counting method. At the same time, a Dutchman, DeJonge,
also published the “range-pair-range,” which is the same as the rainflow procedure.
Statistics were needed for assessment of test data due to scatter. Weibull in Sweden
carried out thousands of fatigue tests on bolts and aluminum specimens to prove his
distribution and to obtain numerical data on the standard deviation of the number of
cycles to failure. His work was published between 1947 and 1955. His two-parameter
statistical distribution, with a shape parameter and a scale parameter, has also
become important for description of long-term stress range distribution for fatigue
analysis of marine structures. Reference is also made to Chapter 10 of this book.
Wöhler had already been introducing the concept of safety factors in fatigue
design in around 1860. During the 1930s it became more obvious that fatigue test
I.1 History of Fatigue 5
data were associated with uncertainties, while the safety philosophy also became an
issue for discussion in the industry. The concepts of “fail-safe” and “safe life” had
been introduced in the 1930s, with “safe life” meaning that an aircraft component
had to be scrapped after a specified service life. A better alternative to this is to
have a “fail-safe” aircraft, which means that failure of a primary member does not
endanger flight safety. After the Comet accidents it was found that it was possible
for the aircraft industry to achieve design solutions that could be considered “fail-
safe.” Using this approach, aircraft can be regularly inspected for fatigue cracks and
reliability is significantly improved today as compared with the 1950s.
In 1920, Griffith, of the Royal Aircraft Establishment in the United Kingdom,
developed the basis for use of fracture mechanics for assessment of overload rup-
ture with cracks present in the material; at that time it was only applicable to brittle
material, such as glass. Irwin developed the energy release concept, including the
effect of plasticity, in around 1956. Westergaard (1939), Irwin (1957), and Williams
(1957) extended the information about stresses and displacements around crack tips
and the concept of stress intensity factors was developed. Reference is also made
to Sih and Liebowitz (1968) for their overview chapter on mathematical theories
of brittle fracture (Liebowitz 1968). In 1961, Paris developed a fatigue crack growth
equation demonstrating that an increment in crack growth during a stress cycle can
be related to the range in the stress intensity factor during that cycle. This equation
soon became popular and was later extended in a number of ways to account better
for mean stress effect and material fracture toughness; see also Section 16.2. In the
United Kingdom the crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) parameter developed
by Wells became extensively used in fracture mechanics during the 1960s. The CTOD
design curve was developed and used in design assessment of the first oil platforms
built for the North Sea in the 1970s; for further information, reference is made to
Wells (1969), Burdekin and Daves (1971), the first draft proposal for CTOD testing
by BSI (1972), and Burdekin (1981). In Norway fracture mechanics was used already
in the beginning of the 1970s as a tool to establish rational acceptance criteria in
relation to non-destructive testing techniques and for documentation of leak-before-
failure in welded connections in spherical tanks in ships for transport of liquefied
natural gas (LNG) made of nine percent nickel steel and of aluminum alloy 5083-
0; ref. Kvamsdal and Howard (1972), Tenge and Solli (1973), Aamodt et al. (1973),
and Tenge et al. (1974). More information on the historic development of fracture
mechanics can be found in Hellan (1984), Anderson (2005), and Macdonald (2011).
Reference is also made to Section 16.6.
After World War II, welding became the normal method for making connec-
tions between plates. S-N data were derived from fatigue testing of different types
of welded connections, and nominal stress S-N curves were established for design
purposes; see, for example, Gurney (1976). These S-N curves were included in the
British Standard (BS 5400) for bridge structures (1980) and in the Department of
Energy Guidance Notes for offshore structures (1984). Later these S-N curves were
used in the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Standards and were also copied
into the ISO Standard for Design of Offshore Structures, ISO 19902 (2007). These
curves are still referred to in the latest revision of BS 7608 (2014) issued as a guide
for design and fatigue assessment of steel products. Similar S-N curves for differ-
ent structural details have also been included in fatigue design standards in other
countries.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
priests be permitted to chant their liturgies over his corpse. On the
following morning, though very weak, he insisted on perusing one of
the essays which had been successful at the provincial examination.
In the evening he was taken out into his garden and was returning
thence with his son when the last seizure occurred. They carried him
into the great Hall of audience, where he sat upright, as if presiding
at a meeting of Council, and thus passed away, well stricken in age,
though only sixty-two by the calendar. “Every man in Nanking,” says
the writer of this narrative, “felt as if he had lost a parent; it was
rumoured that a shooting star had fallen in the city at the very
moment of his death. The news was received by the Throne with
profound grief. All Court functions were suspended for three days.”
The Empress Dowager issued a Decree praising her faithful
servant in unmeasured terms of gratitude and esteem, describing
him as the “very backbone of the Throne,” reciting his glorious
achievements and ordering the erection of Temples in his honour in
all the provinces that had been the scene of his campaign against
the Taipings, in order “to prove our sincere affection for this good and
loyal man.”
VI
TZŬ HSI AND THE EUNUCHS
Thus, Tzŭ Hsi, in her best manner, “for the gallery.” But, “in the
deep seclusion of our Palace,” life went on as before, the merry
round of an Oriental Trianon, while the Chief Eunuch’s influence over
the young Empress became greater every day. It was common
knowledge, and the gossip of the tea-houses, that his lightest whim
was law in the Forbidden City; that Yehonala and he, dressed in
fancy costumes from historical plays, would make frequent
excursions on the Palace lake; that he frequently wore the Dragon
robes sacred to the use of the sovereign, and that the Empress had
publicly presented him with the jade “ju-yi,” symbol of royal power.
Under these circumstances it was only natural, if not inevitable, that
unfounded rumours should be rife in exaggeration of the real facts,
and so we find it reported that An Te-hai was no eunuch, and again,
that Yehonala had been delivered of a son[20] of which he was the
father; many fantastic and moving tales were current of the licentious
festivities of the Court, of students masquerading as eunuchs and
then being put out of the way in the subterranean galleries of the
Palace. Rumours and tales of orgies; inventions no doubt, for the
most part, yet inevitable in the face of the notorious and undeniable
corruption that had characterised the Court and the seraglio under
the dissolute Hsien-Feng, and justified, if not confirmed, as time went
on, by an irresistible consensus of opinion in the capital, and by fully
substantiated events in the Empress Dowager’s career.
H.M. Tzŭ Hsi, with the Consort (Lung Yü) and Principal Concubine (Jen Fei)
of H.M. Kuang-Hsü, accompanied by Court Ladies and Eunuchs.
“To my worthy friend, Mr. Wang, the Seventh (of his family):—
“Since I last had the pleasure of seeing you, you have been
constantly in my thoughts. I wish you, with all respect, long life
and prosperity: thus will your days fulfil my best hopes of you.
And now I beg politely to tell you that I, your younger brother,
[25] am quite ashamed of the emptiness of my purse and I
therefore beg that you, good Sir, will be so good as to lend me
notes to the amount of fifteen hundred taels, which sum kindly
hand to the bearer of this letter. I look forward to a day for our
further conversation,
“Your younger brother,
“Li Lien-ying.”