Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) Ethical Leadership Indian and European Spiritual Approaches 1St Edition Madhumita Chatterji Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Ethical Leadership Indian and European Spiritual Approaches 1St Edition Madhumita Chatterji Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/biblical-theology-for-ethical-
leadership-aaron-perry/
https://textbookfull.com/product/socially-just-religious-and-
spiritual-interventions-ethical-uses-of-therapeutic-power-
elisabeth-esmiol-wilson/
https://textbookfull.com/product/frontiers-in-spiritual-
leadership-discovering-the-better-angels-of-our-nature-1st-
edition-scott-t-allison/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cancer-genetics-and-
therapeutics-focus-on-phytochemicals-madhumita-roy/
Politics and Conscience Dag Hammarskjöld on the Art of
Ethical Leadership Roger Lipsey
https://textbookfull.com/product/politics-and-conscience-dag-
hammarskjold-on-the-art-of-ethical-leadership-roger-lipsey/
https://textbookfull.com/product/working-with-christian-servant-
leadership-spiritual-intelligence-the-foundation-of-vocational-
success-1st-edition-gary-e-roberts-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/shadows-at-noon-the-south-asian-
twentieth-century-1st-edition-joya-chatterji/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-psychology-of-ethical-
leadership-in-organisations-implications-of-group-processes-
catarina-morais/
https://textbookfull.com/product/ethical-approaches-to-human-
remains-a-global-challenge-in-bioarchaeology-and-forensic-
anthropology-kirsty-squires/
EDITED BY
MADHUMITA CHATTERJI
LÁSZLÓ ZSOLNAI
ETHICAL
LEADERSHIP
Indian and European
Spiritual Approaches
Ethical Leadership
wwwwwwwwwwww
Madhumita Chatterji • László Zsolnai
Editors
Ethical Leadership
Indian and European Spiritual Approaches
Editors
Madhumita Chatterji László Zsolnai
IFIM Business School Business Ethics Center
Bangalore, India Corvinus University of Budapest
Hungary
v
vi Preface
The book explores what India and Europe can offer one another in
regard to developing ethical leadership for business to foster sustainabil-
ity, peace and well-being.
Madhumita Chatterji
László Zsolnai
Contents
Part I Introduction 1
vii
viii Contents
Index 339
wwwwwwwwwwww
Notes on Contributors
xi
xii Notes on Contributors
New Zealand) give an introduction to the Tata Group, one of the big-
gest business conglomerates in India. They then describe Tata’s precision
engineering division, Titan, making reference to the strategy, business
ventures and social responsibility that are ingrained in the company. They
argue that the foundation of the Tata Group’s values appears to be an
outcome of applying the spiritual principle of proactively giving back to
society. The authors analyze the branding strategy, product categories and
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives of Tanishq, the jewelry
division of Titan, through a focus on “Mr Perfect” and “Karigar Park”,
two of Tanishq’s innovative CSR initiatives.
Tanishq seeks to support social welfare activities without exception as
it strives to follow the Tata tradition of going beyond the financial bot-
tom line. Company leaders appear to have realized that having a profit-
able company which is neither ethical nor sustainable is not supportable
by society at large. ‘Exemplifiers’ and ‘self-promoters’ both want to be
admired, but the former are more concerned with projecting integrity
than projecting their success. Stakeholder commitment (i.e. ensuring the
business is held in high esteem) and trust (i.e. expecting the organization
to act with integrity) are typically considered to be two important com-
ponents of corporate reputation. The authors conclude that Tanishq is a
self-exemplifier, trusted for its commitment to stakeholders’ wellbeing
and the common good.
In the chapter “Spirituality and Effectiveness in Today’s Workplace”
Lakshminarasimha (IBS Bangalore, India) observes that modern digi-
tal workplaces are strongly goal-oriented and dehumanizing. Stress,
combined with poor interpersonal relationships leads to the forma-
tion of a negative atmosphere in the workplace and reduces productiv-
ity. This negativity also often gets carried home by the individual as a
form of spillover. The consequences for the body and the mind may
be severe.
Lakshminarasimha seeks to explain how one overcomes the deleterious
effects of stress using spiritual edicts. The topic is investigated through a
study of the Indian sacral texts, as well as through the thoughts of India’s
greatest spiritual leaders such as Swami Vivekananda, Sri Aurobindo and
Sri Rabindranath Tagore, along with Western management thinkers such
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
II. As to the eternity of hell torments, we have Origen again at the
head of those who deny it; it being the doctrine of that writer, that
not only men, but devils themselves, after a suitable course of
punishment, answerable to their respective crimes, shall be
pardoned and restored to heaven.—De civit. Dei. l. xxi. c. 17. The
chief principle Origen went upon was this, that all punishments was
emendatory; applied only to painful medicines, for the recovery of
the patient’s health. And other objections, insisted on by modern
authors, are the disproportion between temporary crimes and
eternal punishments, &c.
The scripture phrases for eternity, as is observed by Archbishop
Tillotson, do not always import an infinite duration: thus, in the Old
Testament, for ever often signifies only for a long time; particularly
till the end of the Jewish dispensation: thus in the epistle of Jude,
ver. 7, the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah are said to be set forth for
an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire; that is, of a fire
that was not extinguished till those cities were utterly consumed. So
one generation is said to come, &c. but the earth endureth for ever.
In effect, Mr. Le Clerc notes, that there is no Hebrew word which
properly expresses eternity: עולםgnolam, only imports a time whose
beginning or end is not known; and is accordingly used in a more or
less extensive sense, according to the thing treated of.
Thus when God says, concerning the Jewish laws, that they must
be observed לעולםlegnolam, for ever, we are to understand as long a
space as we should think fit; or a space whose end was unknown to
the Jews before the coming of the Messiah. All general laws, and
such as do not regard particular occasions, are made for ever,
whether it be expressed in those laws, or not; which yet is to be
understood in such a manner, as if the sovereign power could no way
change them.
Archbishop Tillotson, however, argues very strenuously, that
where hell torments are spoken of, the words are to be understood in
the strict sense of infinite duration; and what he esteems a
peremptory decision of the point is, that the duration of the
punishment of the wicked is in the very same sentence expressed by
the very same word which is used for the duration of the happiness
of the righteous, which all agree to be eternal. “These, speaking of the
wicked, shall go away εις ηολασιν ονεωνιον, into eternal punishment;
but the righteous, εις ζωην αιωνι, into life eternal.”
Oldham, in his “Satires upon the Jesuits,” alludes to their “lying
legends,” and the numerous impositions they practised on the
credulous. The following lines are quoted from these legendary
miracles, noticed under the article Legend, and the amours of the
Virgin Mary are narrated in vol. ii. under the article Religious
Nouvellete:—
Tell, how blessed Virgin to come down was seen,
Like playhouse punk descending in machine,
How she writ billet-doux and love discourse,
Made assignations, visits, and amours;
How hosts distrest, her smock for banner wore,
Which vanquished foes!
——How fish in conventicles met,
And mackerel were the bait of doctrine caught;
How cattle have judicious hearers been!
How consecrated hives with bells were hung,
And bees kept mass, and holy anthems sung!
How pigs to the rosary kneel’d, and sheep were taught
To bleat Te Deum and Magnificat;
How fly-flap, of church-censure houses rid
Of insects, which at curse of fryar died.
How ferrying cowls religious pilgrims bore
O’er waves, without the help of sail or oar;
How zealous crab the sacred image bore,
And swam a catholic to the distant shore.
With shams like these the giddy rout mislead,
Their folly and their superstition feed.
Demon was the name given by the Greeks and Romans to certain
genii or spirits, who made themselves visible to men with the
intention of doing them either good or harm.
The Platonists made a distinction between their gods, or dei
majorum gentium; their demons, or those beings which were not
dissimilar in their general character to the good and evil angels of
Christian belief; and their heroes. The Jews and the early Christians
restricted the appellation of demons to beings of a malignant nature,
or to devils; and it is to the early opinions entertained by this people,
that the outlines of later systems of Demonology are to be traced.
“The tradition of the Jews concerning evil spirits are various; some
of them are founded on Scripture; some borrowed from the notions
of the pagans; some are fables of their own invention; and some are
allegories.” The demons of the Jews were considered either as the
distant progeny of Adam or of Eve, which had resulted from an
improper intercourse with supernatural beings, or of Cain. As this
doctrine, however, was extremely revolting to some few of the early
Christians, they maintained that demons were the souls of departed
human beings, who were still permitted to interfere in the affairs of
the earth, either to assist their friends or to persecute their enemies.
This doctrine, however, did not prevail.
An attempt was made about two centuries and a half ago to give, in
a condensed form, the various opinions entertained at an early
period of the Christian era, and during the middle ages, of the nature
of the demons of popular belief. We shall therefore lay this chapter
before our readers, which, being so comprehensive, and at the same
time so concise, requires no abridgment;—“I, for my own part, do
also thinke this argument about the nature and substance of devels
and spirits to be difficult, as I am persuaded that no one author hath
in anie certaine or perfect sort hitherto written thereof. In which
respect I can neither allow the ungodly and profane sects and
doctrines of the Sadduces and Perepateticks, who denie that there
are any spirits and devils at all; nor the fond and superstitious
treatises of Plato, Proctics, Plotenus, Porphyrie; nor yet the vaine and
absurd opinions of Psellus, Nider, Sprenger, Cumanus, Bodin,
Michæl, Andæas, James Mathæus, Laurentius, Ananias, Jamblicus,
&c.; who, with manie others, write so ridiculous lies in these matters,
as if they were babes fraied with bugges; some affirming that the
souls of the dead become spirits, the good to be angels, the bad to be
divels; some, that spirits or divels are onelie in this life; some, that
they are men; some that they are women; some that divels are of
such gender that they list themselves; some that they had no
beginning, nor shall have ending, as the Manechies maintain; some
that they are mortal and die, as Plutarch affirmeth of Pan; some that
they have no bodies at all, but receive bodies according to their
fantasies and imaginations; some that their bodies are given unto
them; some, that they make themselves. Some saie they are wind;
some that one of them begat another; some, that they were created of
the least part of the masse, whereof the earth was made; and some,
that they are substances between God and man, and that some of
them are terrestrial, some celestial, some waterie, some airie, some
fierie, some starrie, and some of each and every part of the elements;
and that they know our thoughts, and carrie our good works to God,
and praiers to God, and return his benefits back unto us, and that
they are to be worshipped; wherein they meete and agree jumpe with
the papists.”—“Againe, some saie, that they are meane between
terrestrial and celestial bodies, communicating part of each nature;
and that, although they be eternal, yet they are moved with
affections; and as there are birds in the aire, fishes in the water, and
worms in the earth, so in the fourth element, which is the fire, is the
habitation of spirits and devils.”—“Some saie they are onelie
imaginations in the mind of man. Tertullian saith they are birds, and
flie faster than anie fowle in the aire. Some saie that divels are not,
but when they are sent; and therefore are called evil angels. Some
think that the devil sendeth his angels abrode, and he himself
maketh his continual abode in hell, his mansion-place.”
In allusion to this subject a late writer remarks that “It was not,
however, until a much later period of Christianity, that more decided
doctrines relative to the origin and nature of demons was
established. These tenets involved certain very knotty points relative
to the fall of those angels, who, for disobedience, had forfeited their
high abode in heaven. The Gnostics, of early Christian times, in
imitation of a classification of the different orders of spirits by Plato
had attempted a similar arrangement with respect to an hierarchy of
angels, the gradation of which stood as follows:—The first, and
highest order, was named seraphim; the second, cherubim; the third
was the order of thrones; the fourth, of dominions; the fifth, of
virtues; the sixth, of powers; the seventh, of principalities; the eighth,
of archangels; the ninth, and lowest, of angels. This fable was, in a
pointed manner, censured by the apostles; yet still, strange to say, it
almost outlived the Pneumatologists of the middle ages. These
schoolmen, in reference to the account that Lucifer rebelled against
heaven, and that Michael the Archangel warred against him, long
agitated the momentous question, what orders of angels fell on this
occasion? At length it became the prevailing opinion that Lucifer was
of the order of seraphim. It was also proved, after infinite research,
that Agares, Belial, and Barbatos, each of them deposed angels of
great rank, had been of the order of virtues; that Bileth, Focalor, and
Phœnix, had been of the order of thrones; that Gaap had been of the
order of powers; and that Pinson had been both of the order of
virtues and powers; and Murmur of thrones and angels. The
pretensions of many other noble devils were, likewise, canvassed,
and in an equally satisfactory manner, determined. Afterwards, it
became an object of enquiry to learn, how many fallen angels had
been engaged in the contest. This was a question of vital importance,
which gave rise to the most laborious research, and to a variety of
discordant opinions.—It was next agitated—where the battle was
fought? in the inferior heaven,—in the highest region of the air, in
the firmament, or in paradise? how long it lasted? whether, during
one second, or moment of time, (punctum temporis) two, three, or
four seconds? These were queries of very difficult solution; but the
notion which ultimately prevailed was, that the engagement was
concluded in exactly three seconds from the date of its
commencement; and that while Lucifer, with a number of his
followers, fell into hell, the rest were left in the air to tempt man. A
still newer question arose out of all these investigations, whether
more angels fell with Lucifer, or remained in heaven with Michael?
Learned clerks, however, were inclined to think, that the rebel chief
had been beaten by a superior force, and that, consequently, devils of
darkness were fewer in number than angels of light.
“These discussions, which, during a number of successive
centuries, interested the whole of Christendom, too frequently
exercised the talents of the most erudite characters in Europe. The
last object of demonologists was to collect, in some degree of order,
Lucifer’s routed forces, and to re-organise them under a decided
form of subordination or government. Hence, extensive districts
were given to certain chiefs that fought under this general. There was
Zemimar, “the lordly monarch of the North,” as Shakspeare styles
him[53], who had this distinct province of devils; there was Gorson,
the king of the South; Amaymon, the king of the East; and Goap, the
prince of the West. These sovereigns had many noble spirits
subordinate to them, whose various ranks were settled with all the
preciseness of heraldic distinction; there were devil dukes, devil
marquises, devil earls, devil knights, devil presidents, and devil
prelates. The armed force under Lucifer seems to have comprised
nearly 2,400 legions, of which each demon of rank commanded a
certain number. Thus, Beleth, whom Scott has described as a “great
king and terrible, riding on a pale horse, before whom go trumpets
and all melodious music,” commanded 85 legions; Agarer, the first
duke under the power of the East, commanded 31 legions; Leraie, a
great marquis, 30 legions; Morax, a great earl and president, 36
legions; Furcas, a knight, 20 legions; and after the same manner, the
forces of the other devil chieftains were enumerated.”
Derivation of the strange and hideous forms
of Devils, &c.
In the middle ages, when conjuration was regularly practised in
Europe, devils of rank were supposed to appear under decided forms,
by which they were as well recognised, as the head of any ancient
family would be by his crest and armorial bearings. The shapes they
were accustomed to adopt were registered along with their names
and characters. A devil would appear, either like an angel seated in a
fiery chariot, or riding on an infernal dragon; and carrying in his
right hand a viper, or assuming a lion’s head, a goose’s feet, and a
hare’s tail, or putting on a raven’s head, and mounted on a strong
wolf. Other forms made use of by demons, were those of a fierce
warrior, or an old man riding upon a crocodile with a hawk in his
hand. A human figure would arise having the wings of a griffin; or
sporting three heads, two of them like those of a toad and of a cat; or
defended with huge teeth and horns, and armed with a sword; or
displaying a dog’s teeth, and a large raven’s head; or mounted upon a
pale horse, and exhibiting a serpent’s tail; or gloriously crowned, and
riding upon a dromedary; or presenting the face of a lion; or
bestriding a bear, and grasping a viper. There were also such shapes
as those of an archer, or of a Zenophilus. A demoniacal king would
ride upon a pale horse; or would assume a leopard’s face and griffin’s
wings; or put on the three heads of a bull, of a man, and a ram with a
serpent’s tail, and the feet of a goose; and, in this attire, sit on a
dragon, and bear in his hand a lance and a flag; or, instead of being
thus employed, goad the flanks of a furious bear, and carry in his fist
a hawk. Other forms were those of a goodly knight; or of one who
bore lance, ensigns, and even sceptre; or, of a soldier, either riding
on a black horse, and surrounded with a flame of fire; or wearing on
his head a Duke’s crown, and mounted on a crocodile; or assuming a
lion’s face, and with fiery eyes, spurring on a gigantic charger, or,
with the same frightful aspect, appearing in all the pomp of family
distinction, on a pale horse; or clad from head to foot in crimson