71 71 7931

1 2 3
-1
-2
-3
-4
n_mousavi@sut.ac.ir

( )Concrete Damage Plasticity

. -
.
. .
.
: ABAQUS

.1

. ABAQUS
3 4 .
[ . ]1
. 5 6
( ) 7
[ .] 2 8
.

adaptive meshing .]3[ .

.
.

1
2

3-

Smeared cracking
Brittle cracking
5
- tensile cracking
6
- compressive crushing
7 - Stiffness recovery
8 - Failure criterion
4-


71 71 7931

.2

1
- ) 1552( 2 . 1

[.]4

) (1 ) a

) b

( .)a-2 . 0/5 1
- . .
2/3
. [.]4

b-2 .

( -a :)2

- Yield Surface
- Drucker-Pruger
3 - Deviatoric Plane
1
2


71 71 7931

( - b :)2 []1

1 .
0/1 . ( )[.]4
( ) / .
1 [.]4
0 = 1.16248

()1

) (2 .
. 36 40 ]4[.
)(3 Abaqus Standard
. .
4 [.]4

.3

- ( )a-3 .
6 7 . E0
ck dt 8 5 .
t t
2 [.]2

()2

el
ck
t = t ot

el 10 t 11 .
= ot
- eccentricity
- Dilation Angle
3 - Viscosity Parameter
4 - Plastic potential surface
5 - Tension stress-strain Relationship
6 - tension stiffening
7 - tension softening
8 - Cracking strain
9 - Damage parameter
10 - Elastic strain corresponding to the undamaged material
11 - Total tensile strain
1
2


71 71 7931

( )a :)3 - )b Nayal )2002( Rasheed

ABAQUS - 3 .
- [.]1

()3

Nayal Rasheed - . b-3

runtime Abaqus 0.8 .
4 [.]4
2

= 0.33

()4

( ) ( ) )t ( . 0
1 . 4
.

( )4 - )a )b
)c

compressive Stiffness Recovery 1

. wc = 1

- Compression stiffness recovery


71 71 7931

.4

- ( ) a-5
. c 2
. 5 .
el
oc

()5

= c

in
c

el c .
= oc

- 6 .
dc c

()6

1dc E0

= in
c

pl
c

) ) ( 3 .
( ) (
1 .

( )a :)5 - )b - )Hsu and Hsu (1994

tensile Stiffness Recovery 4 .

w = 0 .
5 .

- ) Hsu and Hsu (1994 [ .]6

62MP . b-5 0.5

0.3 . 7 .

) cu

()7

) ( c
0

( = c

) 1+( c
0

0 = 8.9x105 cu + 2.114x103

] 1[ cu

0 E0

8 .

- stress-strain relation of concrete

- Inelastic strains
3 - Total tensile strain
4 - Tension stiffness recovery
5 - Rate dependent data
1
2


71 71 7931

E0 = 1.2431x102 cu + 3.28312x103

()8

: 0 /2 . d = 0.8 7 .

( .) 1 MPa = 0.145037743 /2

.5

[ ]7 2002 1 2
.
( :)1 ( )2002
Bay width
Bay height
Column depth
Column width
Beam depth
Beam with
Column longitudinal reinforcement

2032 mm
1524 mm
203 mm
127 mm
197 mm
127 mm
)4#3 ( = 0.011

Column ties
Beam longitudinal reinforcement
Beam ties

)6 gage at 152 mm ( = 0.065

4#3 Top 2#3Bot
)6 gage at 76mm ( = 0.013

( :)2
38.438

fc concrete

29992
338.5
200000

E concrete
fy reinforcing
E reinforcing

Solid C3D4 Beam B31 .

Embedded Regions . 1 2 .
. 3
- 4 - 5 .
( :)3
Viscosity Parameter

fb0/fc0

Eccentricity

Dilation Angle

0.67

1.16

0.05

30

( :)4 - 38.438 MPA

Plastic strain
) (

Damage
) (

Inelastic strain
) (

Stress
)(

- Dynamic Implicit
- Quasi-static

1
2


71 71 7931
0.00000

0.000

0.00000

0.00070

0.000741

19.22

0.00013

0.010

0.00014

0.00100

0.0011405

27.33

0.00033

0.026

0.00037

0.00123

0.001595

33.71

0.00064

0.051

0.00072

0.00136

0.002076

37.31

0.00107

0.087

0.00121

0.00140

0.0026102

38.44

0.00186

0.150

0.00209

0.00134

0.003436

36.79

0.00276

0.223

0.00311

0.00121

0.004324

33.26

0.00376

0.304

0.00423

0.00107

0.005294

29.20

0.00484

0.390

0.00543

0.00092

0.006349

25.30

0.00667

0.540

0.00752

0.00073

0.00825

21.92

0.00701

0.569

0.00793

0.00070

0.008623

19.07

0.00805

0.664

0.00925

0.00061

0.009856

16.67

0.00891

0.763

0.01063

0.00053

0.011165

14.64

0.970

0.01351

0.00042

0.013930

11.53

( :)2 -

Damage
) (

cracking strain
) (

)(MPA

0.000

0.000000

0.000064

0.000083

1.77

0.504

0.000052

0.000052

0.000104

1.41

0.922

0.000307

0.000026

0.000333

0.72

0.992

0.000719

0.000006

0.000724

0.16

Stress

. 6
. 7 . -
8 .

( )2


71 71 7931

( )8

( )9 - ()2002

.6
.
ABAQUS .
.
. - .
.
.

- .
- .


7931 71 71

.7
[1]
[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]
[6]
[7]

ABAQUS 6.10 Analysis Users Manual Volume III

Wahalathantri, B.L., Thambiratnam, D.P., Chan, T.H.T., & Fawzia, S. (2011), A material model for
flexural crack simulation in reinforced concrete elements using ABAQUS. In Proceedings of the First
International Conference on Engineering, Designing and Developing the Built Environment for
Sustainable Wellbeing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, pp. 260-264.
Oliver Martin, European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy JRC-IE,
Comparison of different Constitutive Models for Concrete in ABAQUS/Explicit for Missile Impact
Analyses, Netherlands, 2010
P. Kmiecik m, M. Kaminski, Modelling of reinforced concrete structures and composite structures
with concrete strength degradation taken into consideration, Archives Of Civil And Mechanical
Engineering, Vol. XI, No. 3,2011
Nayal, R., & Rasheed, H.A. (2006), Tension Stiffening Model for Concrete Beams Reinforced with
Steel and FRP Bars. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 18(6), 831-841.
Hsu, L.S., & Hsu, C.-T.T. (1994). Complete stress-strain behavior of high-strength concrete under
compression. Magazine of Concrete Research, 46(169), 301-312.
Al-Chaar, Mohsen Issa and Steve Sweeney, Behavior of Masonry-Infilled Nonductile Reinforced
Concrete Frames, Journal of structural, August 2002