Date Rev. Ref.

Issue Based Risk Assessment 09/02/2017

Page 1 of 4

Department Metallurgy - TSF Section Facilitator Date

Task/Process Drilling, Supply and Installation of Piezometers Risk Assessment Number
Risk Assessment Team
Name Signature Name Signature Name Signature

Task / Process Flow Chart

Loading and Drilling of Installation of

Mobilization to Offloading of tools Setting Up Piezometer Piezometers
site and equipment

Demobilization Lowering of Mast

 Date Rev. Ref.
Issue Based Risk Assessment 09/02/2017
Page 2 of 4

If Inherent Risk has a

Task / Process Inherent Risk
rating of 7 to 25
Residual Risk Responsible Completion
Target Date
Person date
No Step Hazard Current Controls C P R Planned Controls C P R
Mobilization  Road traffic incident  An escort to lead 2 C B  Effective 2 B 5 David
1 to Site  Unknown location truck to the site communication Opata
 Tools not inspected  Site induction  Proper site
 Improper stacking of  Proper arrangement orientation by
tools of tools PM
 Site conditions
Loading and  Hand injuries 2 C B  Effective 1 B 2
2 Offloading  PPE Policy communication
 Slip trip and fall
of tools and  Safe loading and
 Falling on rod  Effective
offloading
equipment procedures
supervision
 Use of PPEs
such as gloves
and helmets
 Stacked rods 3 C 13 2 B 5
 Position rig on
 Hand injuries competent
 Incompetent operator  PPE Policy surface
 Certified and  Effective
 Toppling of rig due competent operator to supervision
to improper
3 Setting Up be used
positioning  Pre-start
 No loose clothes
 Spillage of oil from around work area. inspection to
rig be done on rig
before use.

Drilling of B 5
4  Disruption of buried  Cable detection prior 3 C 18 Use of PPE 2
Piezometers pipes to drilling such as hand
 Slip trip and all  Personnel should gloves, safety
maintain proper work boots,
 Incompetent driller Reflectors,
distance
 Flying object Goggles, ear
 Competent and plugs and
 Hand Injury certified driller respirators.
 Pre-start inspection Effective
 PPE policy communication
 Safe lifting procedure Proper
supervision
No loose
clothes around
 Date Rev. Ref.
Issue Based Risk Assessment 09/02/2017
Page 3 of 4

work area
 Hand injuries  PPE Policy Effective
 Slip trip and fall  Personnel t maintain communication
5
Lowering of 2 B 5
 safe work distance
mast Head injuries
from the rig.

 Housekeeping  An escort to lead Effective 2 B

 Road traffic truck of site communication
6
Demobilisati 3 C 18 Proper
 Improper stacking of  PPE Policy
on supervision
rods
 Slip trip and fall.

Certain 90-
100%
E
11 16 20 23 25
Probability (2 yr Time Horizon)

Probable
50-90%
D
7 12 17 21 24

Possible
25-50%
C
4 8 13 18 22

Unlikely
10-25%
B
2 5 9 14 19

Remote 0-
10%
A
1 3 6 10 15

1 2 3 4 5

Consequence

Potential Potential
Injury No Injury Potential MI Potential MTI
LTI Fatality
 Date Rev. Ref.
Issue Based Risk Assessment 09/02/2017
Page 4 of 4

>$50000 -
Damage <$1000 >$1000 - $5000 >5000 - 50000 >$1000000
$1000000