Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VIII
Division of Samar
District of Marabut
LOGERO ELEM. SCHOOL
Marabut

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

S.Y. 2014-2015

Name of Employee: RUTH JENNETH T. HUGO Name of Rater: __________________________________

Position: HEAD TEACHER III Position: __________________________________
Review Period: JULY 2014 TO MARCH 2015 Date of Review:__________________________________
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd: SAMAR DIVISION/ MARABUT DISTRICT
LOGERO ELEM. SCHOOL
Major Final Weigh Actua
Output (MFO) Key Result Areas Objectives Timeline t Per Weight Per KRA l Ratin Scor
KRA Result g e

Instructional 1. Accounted the learning outcomes of the 10%

Leadership school vis-à-vis goals and targets.
(30 %) (Target measure: Improve the MPS of the
school by
5 (Outstanding)
 5% increase compared to last year in all Feb.
 NAT Performance and GSA is 130% and
Grade levels 2014 to
above
Feb.
March to March 2015 4 (Very Satisfactory)
2014 2015  NAT Performance and GSA is 115% -
129%
English
Math 3 (Satisfactory)
Science  NAT Performance and GSA is 100% -
Filipino 114%
HKS
2 (Unsatisfactory)
Gen. Ave.
 NAT Performance and GSA is 51% - 99%

1 (Poor)
Feb.  NAT Performance and GSA is 50% and
2014 to
  Increased NAT result by 2% in: Feb. below
2015

GRADE III 5 (Outstanding)

 NAT Performance and GSA is 130% and
English above
Math
4 (Very Satisfactory)
Science
Filipino  NAT Performance and GSA is 115% -
HKS 129%
Gen. Ave. 3 (Satisfactory)
 NAT Performance and GSA is 100% -
GRADE VI 114%

English 2 (Unsatisfactory)
Math  NAT Performance and GSA is 51% - 99%
Science
1 (Poor)
Filipino
 NAT Performance and GSA is 50% and
HKS June below
Gen. Ave. 2014
To
 Maintain Drop-out rate of Zero (0) March
2015

5 (Outstanding)
 Zero drop-out rate

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 2% drop –out rate

June 3 (Satisfactory)
2014 to  5% drop-out rate
June
2015 2 (Unsatisfactory)
 Increased the enrolment rate by 2% in all
 7% drop-out rate
Grade levels from 198 to 202.
1 (Poor)
 10% drop-out rate

5 (Outstanding)
 June  Increase of enrolment is 20% and above
2014 to
March 4 (Very Satisfactory)
2015  19% increase of enrolment
 Increased the Completion Rate by at least 2
% from ______ to ______ 3 (Satisfactory)
 9% increase of enrolment

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 4% increase of enrolment

1 (Poor)
 No increase of enrolment
June
2014 to
March 5 (Outstanding)
2015  Completion rate is 100% and above
 Decreased the Retention Rate by at least 2 %
4 (Very Satisfactory)
from ______ to ______
 80-90% of completion rate

3 (Satisfactory)
 60-79% completion rate

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 40-59% completion rate
June
2014 to 1 (Poor)
March  30-39% completion rate

 Decrease the number of Non-Readers from 2015

2% 5 (Outstanding)
 1% decrease of retention rate

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 2-3% decrease of retention rate

3 (Satisfactory)
June  4-5% decrease of retention rate
2014 to 10% 2 (Unsatisfactory)
March  6-7% decrease of retention rate
2015
1 (Poor)
2. Performed instructional supervision to  8-10% decrease of retention rate
achieve learning outcomes.
 5 (Outstanding)
 (Target: Increase 10 supervision per week,  8-10% decrease of non-readers
from 15 to 20 supervision)
June 4 (Very Satisfactory)
2014 to  6-7% decrease of non-readers
March 3 (Satisfactory)
2015  4-5% decrease of non-readers

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 Checked daily lesson log sheets and lesson  2-3% decrease of non-readers
plans thrice a week instead of having it
weekly. 1 (Poor)
 1% decrease of non-readers

5 (Outstanding)
 Supervise 6 teachers per week

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 Supervise 5 teachers per week

3 (Satisfactory)
 Supervise 4 teachers per week

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 Supervise 2-3 teachers per week
June
2014 to 10% 1 (Poor)
March  Supervise 1 teacher per week
2015
5 (Outstanding)
3. Monitored closely the conduct of RRE per  Log sheets and lesson plans checking
Grade Level. was 130% and above systematically
carried out
(Target: Increase in the observation of 6 4 (Very Satisfactory)
classes per week from 3 to 6 classes)
 Log sheets and lesson plans checking
was 115-129% systematically carried
out

3 (Satisfactory)
 Log sheets and lesson plans checking
was 100-114% systematically carried
 out

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 Log sheets and lesson plans checking
was 51-99% systematically carried out

1 (Poor)
 Log sheets and lesson plans checking
was 50% and below systematically
carried out

5 (Outstanding)
 Observe 6 classes having RRE per week

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 Observe 4-5 classes having RRE per
week

3 (Satisfactory)
 Observe 2-3 classes having RRE per
week

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 Observe 1 classes having RRE per week

1 (Poor)
 Did not observe classes having RRE

Learning 1. Provided safe and child friendly learning and 20% 5 (Outstanding)
Environment school environment for learners/pupils  Set agreement met
(20%)
 Target: Conduct regular quarterly meetings Quarterl 4 (Very Satisfactory)
with PTA to accomplish projects. y  Providing only sets of agreements and
partial accomplish of these

3 (Satisfactory)
 Producing sets of agreements
2 (Unsatisfactory)
 With minimal results

1 (Poor)
 Increased 20% participation rate in the
Brigada Eskwela from 151 stakeholders to  Conducted with no result
181 stakeholders May
2015 5 (Outstanding)
 to  25-30% increase of participation rate in
June Brigada Eskwela
2015
4 (Very Satisfactory)
 20-24% increase of participation rate in
Brigada Eskwela

3 (Satisfactory)
 15-19% increase of participation rate in
Brigada Eskwela

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 10-14% increase of participation rate in
Brigada Eskwela
 Intensified health and nutrition program.
1 (Poor)
(Target: Decrease the severely wasted and
Year  9% below increase of participation rate
wasted pupils by 10%)
Wasted: round in Brigada Eskwela
Severely Wasted:
5 (Outstanding)
 20-15% decrease of severely wasted
pupils

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 14-11% decrease of severely wasted
pupils

3 (Satisfactory)
 10-6% decrease of severely wasted
pupils

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 Constructed perimeter fence in the entire  5-1% decrease of severely wasted
school site. pupils
(Target: 80% constructed the perimeter Nov.
fence of the entire school site) 2014 1 (Poor)
 No decrease of severely wasted and
wasted pupils

5 (Outstanding)
 130% and above constructed the
perimeter fence of the entire school
 4 (Very Satisfactory)
 115-129% and above constructed the
perimeter fence of the entire school

3 (Satisfactory)
 Constructed 7 classrooms thru Emirates Red  100-114% and above constructed the
Crescent (UAE) perimeter fence of the entire school
Aug.
2014 to 2 (Unsatisfactory)
Nov.  51-99% and above constructed the
2014 perimeter fence of the entire school

1 (Poor)
 No perimeter fence was constructed

5 (Outstanding)
 Constructed 6 classrooms and above
thru Emirates Red Crescent-UAE

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 Constructed 4-5 classrooms thru
 Repaired 3-seaters toilet with wash stand Emirates Red Crescent-UAE
thru PLAN
3 (Satisfactory)
Sept.
2014  Constructed 2-3 classrooms thru
Emirates Red Crescent-UAE

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 Constructed 1 classroom thru Emirates
Red Crescent-UAE

1 (Poor)
 No classroom was constructed

5 (Outstanding)
 Repaired 3-seaters comfort room with
wash stand thru PLAN
 Rehabilitated 2 classrooms for repair thru 4 (Very Satisfactory)
Joint Together Society (JTS) Korea  Repaired 3-seaters comfort room with
Aug. no wash stand thru PLAN
2014
 3 (Satisfactory)
 Repaired 2-seaters comfort room with
wash stand thru PLAN

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 Provided ICT facilities workshop room as  Repaired 2-seaters comfort room with
learning support system no wash stand thru PLAN
(Target: Accomplished 75% requirements for Feb.
e-classroom) 2015 1 (Poor)
 No comfort room was repaired

5 (Outstanding)
 Rehabilitated 2 classrooms for repair

3 ( Satisfactory)
 Rehabilitated 1 classrooms for repair

1 (Poor)
 No classroom was rehabilitated for
repair

5 (Outstanding)
 100% accomplished the requirements
for e-classroom with complete facilities

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 85-99% accomplished the requirements
for e-classroom with complete facilities

3 (Satisfactory)
 70-84% accomplished the requirements
for e-classroom with complete facilities

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 50-69% accomplished the requirements
for e-classroom with complete facilities

1 (Poor)
 49% below accomplished the
requirements for e-classroom with
complete facilities
Human 1. Provide technical assistance to teachers on 20% 5 (Outstanding)
Resource matters pertaining to enhancement of  100% of teachers made the IPPD and
Management classroom and management skills and use the TSNA for analysis of trainings to
(20%) instructional competence for support be conducted
services within the RPMS cycle
4 (Very Satisfactory)
 Assess the TSNA results of every teacher  90% of teachers made the IPPD and use
(Target: 5 teachers submitted TSNA results the TSNA for analysis of trainings to be
which means 83% made their IPPD) conducted

3 (Satisfactory)
 80% of teachers made the IPPD and use
the TSNA for analysis of trainings to be
conducted

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 50% of teachers made the IPPD and use
the TSNA for analysis of trainings to be
conducted

1 (Poor)
 Below 50% of teachers made the IPPD
and use the TSNA for analysis of
trainings to be conducted
 Conducted School-Based INSET for teachers
based on TSNA
5 (Outstanding)
 130% and above of teachers
performance increase at the end of
every semester

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 115-129% of teachers performance
increase at the end of every semester

3 (Satisfactory)
 100-114% of teachers performance
increase at the end of every semester

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 51-99% of teachers performance
increase at the end of every semester

1 (Poor)
 50% and below of teachers
 Encourage at least 2 teachers to enrol in performance increase at the end of
Master’s Degree this second semester every semester

5 (Outstanding)
 4 teachers enrolled of Master’s Degree

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 3 teachers enrolled of Master’s Degree

 Conduct school-based training in ICT for 6 3 (Satisfactory)

teachers for the LIS and access in LRMDS  2 teachers enrolled of Master’s Degree
Portal
2 (Unsatisfactory)
 1 teacher enrolled of Master’s Degree

1 (Poor)
 No teacher enrolled of Master’s Degree

5 (Outstanding)
 100% of teachers attended school-
based training for LIS and access of
LRMDS Portal

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 80% of teachers attended school-based
training for LIS and access of LRMDS
Portal

3 (Satisfactory)
 75% of teachers attended school-based
training for LIS and access of LRMDS
Portal

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 50% of teachers attended school-based
training for LIS and access of LRMDS
Portal

1 (Poor)
 50% below 0f teachers attended school-
based training for LIS and access of
LRMDS Portal
Parents 1. Established school, family and community July 2014 10% 5 (Outstanding)
Involvement partnership for performance  130% and above project
and accomplishment with full
Community  Plan International donated 6 teaching kits documentation report on completion
Partnership and 190 school supplies for the school
(15%) children which is 100% of the school 4 (Very Satisfactory)
enrolees  115-129% project accomplishment with
full documentation report on
completion

3 (Satisfactory)
 100-114% project initiative only with no
completion report

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 51-99% project initiative only with no
completion report

 UNICEFF donated 10 teaching kits, 192
school supplies, 2 boxes sports equipments
for the school children which is 100% of the
school enrolees
1 (Poor)
July 2014  No project/event initiated
5 (Outstanding)
 130% and above project
accomplishment with full
documentation report on completion

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 115-129% project accomplishment with
full documentation report on
completion

3 (Satisfactory)
 100-114% project initiative only with no
completion report

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 51-99% project initiative only with no
 Rehabilitated the water system thru Aug. completion report
donation from NGO/stakeholder 2014
1 (Poor)
  No project/event initiated

5 (Outstanding)
 130% and above project
accomplishment with full
documentation report on completion

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 115-129% project accomplishment with
full documentation report on
completion

3 (Satisfactory)
 100-114% project initiative only with no
completion report
 Conducted quarterly meeting with SGC for Quarterl
strategic planning y 2 (Unsatisfactory)
Meeting  51-99% project initiative only with no
completion report

1 (Poor)
 No project/event initiated

5 (Outstanding)
 Set agreements met.

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 Producing only set agreement and
partial accomplishment of strategic
planning

3 (Satisfactory)
 Performed data based Strategic Plan/SIP  Producing set of agreements
and AIP through the strategy
2 (Unsatisfactory)
 With minimal results

1 (Poor)
 Conducted with no result
 5 (Outstanding)
 130% and above accomplishment and
strategic plan of set successful
interventions

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 115-129% and above accomplishment
and strategic plan of set successful
interventions

3 (Satisfactory)
 100-114% and above accomplishment
 Produced a school strategic plan/SIP and and strategic plan of set successful
AIP through the strategic planning process October interventions
2014
2 (Unsatisfactory)
 51-99% accomplishment of planned
interventions

1 (Poor)
 50% below accomplishment with no
intervention

5 (Outstanding)
 130% and above accomplishment and
strategic plan of set successful
interventions

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 115-129% and above accomplishment
and strategic plan of set successful
interventions
 Strategic Plan was based on DepEd Mission
and Vission 3 (Satisfactory)
 100-114% and above accomplishment
and strategic plan of set successful
interventions

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 51-99% accomplishment of planned
interventions

1 (Poor)
  50% below accomplishment with no
intervention

5 (Outstanding)
 130% and above accomplishment and
strategic plan of set successful
interventions

School 1. Performed school leadership and 4 (Very Satisfactory)

Leadership management and operation functions Monthly  115-129% and above accomplishment
Management and strategic plan of set successful
and (Target: Submit updated liquidation in any interventions
Operations school cash advances such as MOOE, SBM
Grant, SBRMS, etc.) 3 (Satisfactory)
 100-114% and above accomplishment
and strategic plan of set successful
interventions

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 51-99% accomplishment of planned
interventions

1 (Poor)
 50% below accomplishment with no
intervention

5 (Outstanding)
 130% above updated and complete
 Maintained School EMIS and submit it to submission of liquidation reports on any
the Di vision Office cash advances

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 115-129% partial submission of
liquidation reports in any cash advances

3 (Satisfactory)
 100-114% updated submission of
liquidation report but incomplete
documents in the liquidation

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 51-99% incomplete documents in the
liquidation and late in submission
1 (Poor)
 Very late and incomplete in submission
of liquidation reports

5 (Outstanding)
 Updated and complete information in
school EMIS

4 (Very Satisfactory)
 Updated but incomplete information in
school EMIS

3 (Satisfactory)
 late but complete information in school
EMIS

2 (Unsatisfactory)
 late and incomplete information in
school EMIS

1 (Poor)
 No information at all of School EMIS