Republic of the Philippines

JOSE RIZAL MEMORIAL STATE UNIVERSITY

The Premier University in the Province of Zamboanga del Norte
Main Campus,Dapitan City

Gov. Guading Adaza St., Sta. Cruz, Dapitan City

JRMSU CED 008
Province of Zamboanga del Norte
(065) 213-6444
(065) 213-6707
jrmsu_vpred2009@yahoo.
com OFFICE OF THE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
0917-9022-738

PRE-SERVICE TEACHER’S OFF CAMPUS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

(Reference: Experiential Learning Courses Handbook, A Project of Teacher Education Council TEC, Dep ED,CHED)

Name of Mentee: ________________________ Name of Mentor: ___________________________

Subject Taught: ________________________ Cooperating School: _______________________

Semester: ________________________ Academic Year: _______________

Directions: Kindly rate the Pe- service Teacher of his/her overall performance during the off campus training using the rating scale
expressed below:

5 = Excellent 4 = Very Good 3 = Good 2=Poor 1 = Failure

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1 2 3 4 5
TEACHER’S PERSONALITY
The teacher…
A. came to school neat, well-groomed, prepared and showed enthusiastic attitude at all
times.
B. exhibited willingness to participate and offer support in school activities.
C. demonstrated strong personality enough to command respect and attention.
D. demonstrated punctuality and promptly attends classes as scheduled.
E. established rapport; showed respect, courtesy, obedience and a strong sense of
responsibility.
INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE
I. LESSON PLANNING
A. lesson plans were well prepared and were submitted on time. (as practice teachers at least they B.
are given 2 days before actual teaching)
C. congruency was observed between objective and subject matter; objective and teaching
procedure; and objective and formative test.
II. DELIVERY
A. CONTENT
The teacher…
1. demonstrated in depth knowledge of the subject matter and provided new ideas and solid
understanding in the field.
2. provided sufficient and concrete examples to create meaningful learning experiences by 3.
relating lessons to real life situations common in the locality.
B. QUESTIONING SKILLS
The teacher’s questioning skill stimulates discussion in different ways such as:
1. probing for learner’s understanding and facilitating factual recall. a.
2. prompting students to articulate their ideas encouraging convergent and divergent
thinking.
3. prompting risk-taking and problem solving techniques with the aim of achieving
contextualized learning.
4. stimulating curiosity to further understanding and simplifying issues.

C. TEACHING METHODS
 The teacher…
1. used differentiated activities and approaches suited to the needs and capabilities of the
students.
2. demonstrated creativity and proper utilization of instructional materials/technology
which effectively helped illustrate the lessons presented.
3. evaluated student’s learning using varied assessment techniques.
D. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
The teacher had a systematic way of:
1. checking attendance; independent study; practice exercises and group work/projects.
2. implementing classroom rules.
3. correcting, distributing, and collecting outputs.
4. implementing order and discipline in the classroom.

TOTAL

TOTAL SCORE : __________

Descriptive Rating : ___________________

95-100 = Excellent 90-94 = Very Good 85-89 = Good 80-84 = Poor 79 & below = Failure

Descriptive Equivalent: (Reference: JRMSU Grading System and CED Guidelines implementing 80% as a passing rate for Professional Education and other Major
subjects)

Remarks: (The critic teacher may make comments on the student trainee’s professional development and improvement of his/her teaching performance during
his/her off-campus training.)

Evaluated by: Conforme:

________________________________________ ________________________________________
Signature over printed name of Cooperating Teacher Signature over printed name of Pre-service Teacher

Approved:

___________________________________________
Signature over printed name of School Principal

Prepared:

JOJI T. RECAMARA, EMD

Associate Dean, College of Education
Main Campus