You are on page 1of 26

ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY DESIGN OF CONCRETE PIER

CHANHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT (Sta.10+940)

Design of Concrete Pier

1.0 Design Data and Specefication.

Substructure type - RC Concrete Pier 145.0677

Concrete, fc'= 3481.6248 psi = 24.00 Mpa

fc= 1392.64992 psi = 9.60 Mpa

Ec= 3363301.8 psi = 23184.36 Mpa

Reinforcement Steel

Grade 60 fy= 60000 psi = 413.60 Mpa

fs= 24000 psi = 165.44 Mpa

Grade 40 fy= 40000 psi = 275.73 Mpa

fs= 20000 psi = 137.87 Mpa

Es= 29000000 psi = 199906.67 Mpa

Modular ratio n=Es/Ec= 8.62 take 9

Reference - AASHTO spec. for higway bridges (1996)

Foundation Data - Allowable Bearing Capacity = 6.00 KG/CM2

Design Method - Service Load Design Method

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLC 26 JAN.,2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

2.0 Loading

2.10 Dead load

2.1.1 DL from superstructure

I) First/Shorter Span (12m RC T-Girder Bridge)

Span = 13.10 m
Slab th. = 0.22 m
Girder w. = 0.40 m Spacing = 2.6 m
Girder d. = 1.00 m(including slab)
Overhang length = 1.45 m
Rail, Depth = 0.70 m(sum if two rails) Width = 0.20
Post, Depth = 0.25 Width = 0.50 Spacing = 1.50
Height= 1.10 m
Curb, Height= 0.00 m av. Width = 0.28 m
Bearing Thickness = 0.043 m

Diaphragm at center Depth = 0.48 Width = 0.25 m


Diaphragm at end Depth = 0.48 Width = 0.25 m

a) Load of extereior girder per meter

Rail = 3.36 KN/m Diaphragm at ends = 1.85


Post = 2.20 KN/m Diaphragm at center = 1.98
Curb = 0.00 KN/m
Over Ha. Top = 7.66 KN/m
Over Han. botto = 0.00 KN/m
Girder = 9.60 KN/m
Interior Slab= 5.81 KN/m
Fillet = 0.12 KN/m
Total = 28.74 KN/m

Ra= 191.11 KN

Rb= 191.11 KN

b) Load of interior girder per meter

Slab= 13.728 KN/m


Girder= 7.488 KN/m Ra= 146.21 KN
Fillets= 0.24 KN/m
Total = 21.456 KN/m Rb= 146.21 KN
Diaphragm at ends= 3.696 KN
Diaphragm at center= 3.96 KN

II) Second/Longer Span (20m RC T-Girder Bridge)

Span = 21.20 m
Slab th. = 0.22 m
Girder w. = 0.40 m Spacing = 2.6 m
Girder d. = 1.85 m(including slab)
Overhang length = 1.45 m
Rail, Depth = 0.70 m(sum if two rails) Width = 0.20
Post, Depth = 0.25 Width = 0.50 Spacing = 1.50
Height= 1.10 m
Curb, Height= 0.00 m av. Width = 0.28 m
Bearing Thickness = 0.043 m

Diaphragm at center Depth = 1.33 Width = 0.25 m


Diaphragm at end Depth = 1.33 Width = 0.25 m

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

a) Load of extereior girder per meter

Rail = 3.36 KN/m Diaphragm at ends = 7.46


Post = 2.20 KN/m Diaphragm at center = 7.59
Curb = 0.00 KN/m
Over Ha. Top = 7.66 KN/m
Over Han. botto = 0.00 KN/m
Girder = 17.76 KN/m
Interior Slab= 5.81 KN/m
Fillet = 0.12 KN/m
Total = 36.90 KN/m

Ra= 402.44 KN

Rb= 402.44 KN

b) Load of interior girder per meter

Slab= 13.728 KN/m


Girder= 15.648 KN/m Ra= 336.44 KN
Fillets= 0.24 KN/m
Total = 29.616 KN/m Rb= 336.44 KN
Diaphragm at ends= 14.916 KN
Diaphragm at center= 15.18 KN

LEFT T-GIRDER RIGHT T-GIRDER


Data 13.10 Span (m) 21.20 Span (m)
Exterior Interior Exterior Interior
X-sectional
(kN/m) 28.74 21.46 36.90 29.62
Diaphrams-
middle(No.) 1 1 1 1
(kN) 1.98 3.96 7.59 15.18
ends(kN) 1.85 3.70 7.46 14.92
Support
Reaction(kN) 191.11 146.21 402.44 336.44 1141.306

2.1.2) Dead Load of Substructure


Roadway G 2008.27 m
Footing Elev 1994.6 m
H = 11.731 m
P1(m)= 6.60 m
P2= 6.10 m
P3= 0.25 m
P4= 0.40 m
P5= 0.85 m
P6= 1.00 m
P7= 0.70 m
P8= 3.20 m
P9= 1.20 m
P10= 0.60 m
C1= 1.00 m
C2= 4.57 m
C3= 0.60 m
C4= 4.57 m
F1= 1.00 m
F2= 8.20 m
F3= 4.00 m
F4= 1.50 m
B1= 0.60 m
B2= 0.60 m

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

Weight of Pier Cap= 41.940 KN/m (W1)

Weight of column= 183.43 KN (One column only)

Weight of Bracing= 8.64 KN/m (W2)

Summary of dead loads from superstructure & substructure

From ext ger.of Longer sp= PEL

From int.ger.of Longer sp= PIL

Load from RC Slab = Ws

From int.ger.of Shorter sp= PIS

PEL= 402.4 KN

PIL= 336.44 KN

Load from PES= 191.11 KN

PIS= 146.21 KN

W1= 41.940

W2= 8.64

H1= 5.37

H2= 5.37

C= 1.2

S= 4.20
2.20 Live Loads

Live loading :- AASHTO standard HL-93 Truck

P= wheel load = 72.50 KN

I) Longitudinal Arrangement

Case 1. For Maximum Axial Load on Pier (Middle Axle near center of pier)

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

D= 0.60 m

Rp1= 1.797 P

Rp2= 0.179 P

Total axial load= 1.977 P = 143.30 KN

Moment about center of pier = 0.485 P = 35.187 KN.m

Case 2. For Maximum Moment (Load longer span only)

D= 0.60 m

Rp1= 1.946 P

Rp2= 0.00 P

Total axial load= 1.946 P 141.07 KN

Moment about center of pier = 0.584 P 42.32 KN

II) Transversal Arrangement


Case I. When only one track is on one side

P P

0.7 1.80 1.55

1.45 2.6m 2.6m 1.45


Ra Rb Ra

Ra= 1.885 P

Rb= 0.115 P

For maximum Rxn case(Case 1. Long. Arangement)

Ra= 3.725 P = 270.07 KN Mo(KNm)= 0.971 P = 70.37


Rb= 0.228 P = 16.53 KN

For maximum Moment case(Case 2. Long. Arangement)

Ra= 3.667 P = 265.86 KN Mo(KNm)= 1.167 P = 84.64


Rb= 0.225 P = 16.277 KN

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

Case II. When two tracks are shifted to one side

P P P P

0.7 1.80 1.20 1.80

1.45 2.6m 2.6m 1.45

Ra Rb Rc

Ra= 2.019 P
Rb= 0.981 P + 0.442 P = 1.42 P
Rc= 0.56 P = 0.56 P

For maximum Rxn case (Case 1. Long. Arangement)

Ra= 3.991 P = 289.36 KN Mo(KNm)= 1.941 P = 140.75


Rb= 2.813 P = 203.93 KN
Rc= 1.102 P = 79.92 KN

For maximum Moment case (Case 2. Long. Arangement)

Ra= 3.929 P = 284.85 KN Mo(KNm)= 2.335 P = 169.28


Rb= 2.769 P = 200.75 KN
Rc= 1.085 P = 78.67 KN

Case III. When two tracks are symmetrical with respect to center line of bridge

P P P P

1.80 1.20 1.80

1.45 2.6m 2.6m 1.45

Ra Rb Rc

Ra= 1.154 P
Rb= 0.846 P + 0.846 P = 1.692 P
Rc= 1.154 P = 1.154 P

For maximum Rxn case(Case 1. Long. Arangement)

Ra= 2.281 P = 165.35 KN Mo(KNm)= 140.75


Rb= 3.345 P = 242.51 KN
Rc= 2.281 P = 165.35 KN

For maximum Moment case(Case 2. Long. Arangement)

Ra= 2.245 P = 162.77 KN Mo(KNm)= 169.28


Rb= 3.293 P = 238.73 KN
Rc= 2.245 P = 162.77 KN

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 6 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

2) Lane Loading
a) Exterior Girder
Arrangement of lane load for maximum reaction on the Exterior girder
when only one lane is loaded

3.00
W=3.1KN/m
1.00

1.45 2.60 2.60 1.45


Re
8.10
Arrangement of lane load for maximum reaction on the Exterior girder
when only one lane is loaded

3.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.45 2.60 2.60 1.45


Re
8.10

Distributed lane load including multiple presence factor shall be computed as follows.

For one lane loaded case, Ra(1) = 3.1*3*(0.35+3/2)/2.6 = 6.617 KN/m W


Rb(1) = (3.1*3) - Ra(1) = 2.683 KN/m W
Rc(1) = 0.00 KN/m W

For two lane loade case, Ra(2) = 3.1*3*(0.35+3/2)/2.6 = 6.617 KN/m W


Rb(2) = 2*(3.10*3) - (Ra+Rc) = 5.365 KN/m W
Ra(2) = 3.1*3*(0.35+3/2)/2.6 = 6.617 KN/m W

The two lane loading case governs the design,

Case1. For Maximum Axial load:


W= 1.00 KN/m ( two lane loaded)

W=2*9.3KN/m

D
span span
RP1
RP2

Rp1= 10.600 KN/m-longer Moment(KNm)= 2.43 KNm


Rp2= 6.550 KN/m-shorter two lanes loaded
Summary of Loads
Distributed lane load including multiple presence factor shall be computed as follows.

For one lane loaded case, Ra(1)= 113.487 KN/m W


Rb(1)= 46.008 KN/m W
Rc = 0.000 KN/m W

For two lane loade case, Ra(2)= 113.487 KN/m W


Rb(2) = 92.02 KN/m W
Rc(2)= 113.487 KN/m W
The two lane loading case governs the design,

1) Maximum axial load


Lane + Truck from both spans = 156.40 KN= 25.64 KN/m
2) Maximum Moment: Distributed over the pier cap width
6.938 KNm/m
Eec entricity, e = 0.271 m

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 7 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

Impact First span I=50/(s+125) <= 30% s= 13.10 m


s= 42.98 ft
I= 0.2977
I= 29.77 %

Second span I= 0.2570 = 25.70 %


2.3 wind load

2.3.1 wind load on superstructure

a) Transverse direction

w= 50 lb/ft2 (Art.3.15.2.1.3)
w= 2.4 KN/m2 CHANGES IF THERE IS SKEWNESS

Exposed areas of the super structures,

Area Yi Ai*Yi
First Span Railing 4.62 1.79 8.28
Post 0.87 1.24 1.09
Sup. Str. 6.55 0.54 3.56
12.04 12.93
1.07 m
Second Span Railing 7.46 2.64 19.70
Post 1.41 2.09 2.96
Sup. Str. 19.61 0.97 18.98
28.48 41.64
1.46 m
40.52 54.57

Center of action above girder bottom of first Span = 1.35 m

FT first span = 28.83 KN FT second span = 68.18 KN

Transverse wind load on pier from super str. = 97.01 KN

b) Longitudinal direction
w= 12 lb/ft2
w= 0.57 KN/m2

FL first span = 6.92 KN FL sec. Span = 16.36 KN

Longitudinal wind load on pier from super str. = 23.28 KN

The longitudinal force is applied at same location as the transverse load.

2.3.2 wind load on live load

a) Transverse direction

WL= 100 lb/ft


WL= 1.46 KN/m

Total length of span= 17.15 m


Transverse load = 25.01 KN
Center of action = 6 ft = 1.83 m above deck.
center of action above bottom of girder of first span = 3.68 m

b) Longitudinal direction

WL= 40 lb/ft
WL= 0.58 KN/m

Longitudinal load = 10.00 KN


Center of action is simmilar to that of the transverse load.

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

2.3.3 Wind load on sub structure

a) Transverse direction

WL= 40 lb/ft2
WL= 1.92 KN/m2

Wind load per linear meter of pier = 1.92 KN/m

b) Longitudinal direction

on the pier cap w= 1.92 KN/m


on the bracing w= 1.15 KN/m
on the columns w= 1.92 KN/m

2.3.4 Force of Stream current on pier

As the piers are found on the banks of the river, this force shall be neglected.

2.3.5 Longitudinal Force(Breaking force).(Art. 3.9)

25% of the design truck


BrTr= 81.25 KN
25% OF the design tandem
BrTan= 55 KN
5% of design truck load and lane
BrTr_lane= 32.1995 KN
5% of design truck load and lane
BrTan_lane= 26.9495 KN

Use Br=max(BrTr,BrTan,BrTr_lanmBrTan_lane)= 81.25 KN


center of action 6ft above deck = 1.80
center of action above bottom og girder = 3.65 m

Uniform Load = 640 Lbs/ft = 9.33 KN/m


Concen. Force= 18000 Lbs = 80.064 KN

LF= 24.01 KN

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 9 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

3.0 Stability Analysis

Assume combined footing, length= 8.20 m


width= 4.00 m
depth= 1.00 m

3.1) Check for group I (DL + (LL+I))

Case 1 - When both superstructures are loaded

i) Dead loads, Superstructure First sp.= 528.44 KN


Sec. sp.= 1141.31 KN

Substructure Pier cap= 270.68 KN


Bracing = 27.65 KN
Column = 366.86 KN
Footing = 787.20 KN
Tot-sub= 1,452.39 KN
ii) Live load

P(KN) MT(KNM) ML(KNM)


Case I Max A.F Ra+Rb= 446.10 Ra*5.2/2+Rb*0.0/2= 997.24 0.363*P*2= 70.37
Max. Moment Ra+Rb= 441.63 Ra*5.2/2+Rb*0.0/2= 986.30 0.428*P*2= 84.64

Case II Max AF Ra to Rc= 892.19 544.54 0.363*P*3= 105.56


Max. Moment Ra to Rc= 963.18 (Ra-Rc)*2.6+(Rb)*0 = 1035.67 0.428*P*3= 126.96

Case III Max AF Ra to Rc= 972.11 0.00 0.363*P*3= 105.56


Max. Moment Ra to Rc= 963.18 (Ra-Rc)*2.6+(Rb)*0.0 = 0.00 0.428*P*3= 126.96

A) Stability against overturning

Overturning in the longitudinal direction about the toe,

Mresisting = Tot-sub*width/2+First sp*(width/2-0.25)+Sec.sp*(width/2+0.25)


Mresisting = 6397.4877 KNM
Mdriving = 126.96 KNM

S.F= 50.3895934 > 2.0 ok!

B) Stability against bearing pressure

Case I. a) Max Axial force case δall = 600.00 KN/m2

P total = 3887.22 et=MT/P = 0.256542751 smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 143.98 KN/m2


MT = 997.24 el=ML/P = 0.018103795
ML = 70.37 143.98 < Allowable bearing capacity.ok!

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 10 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

b) Max Moment case

P total = 3882.75 et=MT/P = 0.254019444 smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 144.24982 KN/m2


MT = 986.30 el=ML/P = 0.021799043
ML = 84.64 144.249825 < Allowable bearing capacity.ok!

Case II. a) Max Axial force case

P total = 4333.32 et=MT/P = 0.125664018 smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 149.0885 KN/m2


MT = 544.54 el=ML/P = 0.024360132
ML = 105.56 149.0885 < all. bearing cap. Ok!

b) Max Moment case

P total = 4404.30 et=MT/P = 0.235149354 smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 163.18745 KN/m2


MT = 1035.67 el=ML/P = 0.028826477
ML = 126.96 163.18745 < all. bearing cap. Ok!

Case III - is safe and hence neglected since the loading is less than that of case II.

Since no horizontal force is applied stability against sliding is also safe!

Case 2 - When only one superstructures is loaded (Longer span)

Load from super str.= 1141.31 KN


Load from substructure= 1452.39 KN

A) Stability against overturning

Resisting Moment=sub. Str*width/2 = 2904.78673 KNM

Driving Moment = super str.* 0.25 = 285.3266 KNM

S.F= 10.18 >2, OK!

B) Stability ageanest bearing pressure

P total = 2912.69 KN e= 0.09795983


Moment = 285.3266 KNM

smax=P/A[1+6e/B)= 101.85 Safe !

3.2) Check for group IA (DL + 2*(LL+I))

Take 150% - percentage of basic unit stress

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 11 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

Case 1 - When both superstructures are loaded

Dead load Sup. Str. 1st span = 528.44 KN


2nd span = 1141.31 KN

Sub Str. = 1452.39 KN

Live load Two times that of group I

P(KN) MT(KNM) ML(KNM)


Case I Max AF 2(Ra+Rb)= 892.19215 1994.47676 140.7469034
Max. Moment 2(Ra+Rb)= 883.25887 1972.59023 169.2806604

Case II Max AF 2(Ra+Rb)= 1784.3843 1089.08408 211.120355


Max. Moment 2(Ra+Rb)= 1926.3529 2071.33728 253.9209906

A) Stability against overturning

Mresisting = 6397.4877
Mdriving = 253.92099

S.F= 25.1947967 > 2.0 ok!

B) Stability against bearing pressure

Case I. a) Max Axial force case

P total = 4333.32 et=MT/P = 0.46026559 smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 183.04


MT = 1994.47676 el=ML/P = 0.032480176
ML = 140.746903 183.04 < 1.5 * all. Bear. Cap Ok!

b) Max Moment case

P total = 4324.38 et=MT/P = 0.456155212 smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 183.59


MT = 1972.59023 el=ML/P = 0.039145614
ML = 169.28066 183.59 < 1.5*all. Bear. Cap Ok!

Case II. a) Max Axial force case

P total = 5225.51 et=MT/P = 0.20841683 smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 193.26465


MT = 1089.08408 el=ML/P = 0.040401872
ML = 211.120355 193.26465 < 1.5*all. Bear. Cap Ok!

Case 2 - When only one superstructure is placed

No live load exists and hence it is safe as seen for group I loading.

3.3) Check for group III (DL+(LL+I)+0.3W+WL+LF)

Take - 125% basic unit stress

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 12 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

Case 1 - when both super structures are placed

a. Dead load 3122.13 KN

b. Live load + impact


a b
Case I P 446.10 441.63
MT 997.24 986.30
ML 70.37 84.64

Case II P 892.19 963.18


MT 544.54 1035.67
ML 105.56 126.96

c. Wind load on Structure (W)

On Super Structure
FTw = 97.01 KN MTw= 1268.68 KNM
FLw= 23.28 KN MLw= 304.48 KNM
On Sub Structure

FTw= 44.94 MTw= 263.57634 KNM

Longitudinal force
Force Arm Mom
Pier cap 12.64 10.2313 129.32691
Bracing 3.677 4.86565 17.89189
Column 37.27 4.86565 181.36599
FLw= 53.59 MLw= 328.58479

Total FTw = 141.94 KN MTw= 1532.26 KNM


FLw= 76.87 KN MLw= 633.07 KNM

d. Wind load on live load

FTwl = 25.01 MTwl= 385.41302


FLw l= 10.00 MLwl= 154.16521

e. Longitudinal force

Flf = 81.25 KN Mlf = 1249.7306


A) Stability against overturning

Mres = 6397.4877 KNM

M driving = MLL+0.3Mw+Mwl+Mlf = 1699.37646

S.F= 3.76 > 2 Ok!

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 13 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

B) Stability against bearing

Case I a) Max Axial force case

P total = 3585.38

Mt live L = 997.24

ML LL = 70.37

MT total =Mt LL+0.3Mtw+Mtwl = 1842.33

ML total=Mldl+MLll+0.3MLw+MLwl+MLlf = 1510.97194

el= 0.4214258 et= 0.513844557

smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 219.5086651 < 1.25*all bear. Cap Ok!

b) Max Moment case

P total = 3580.91

Mt live L = 986.30

ML LL = 84.64

MT total =Mt LL+0.3Mtw+Mtwl = 1831.39

ML total=Mldl+MLll+0.3MLw+MLwl+MLlf = 1525.23882

el= 0.4259356 et= 0.511429502

smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 219.7808118 < 1.25*all bear. Cap Ok!

Case II a) Max Axial force case

P total = 4031.48

Mt live L = 544.54

ML LL = 105.56

MT total =Mt LL+0.3Mtw+Mtwl = 1389.63

ML total=Mldl+MLll+0.3MLw+MLwl+MLlf = 1546.15866

el= 0.3835216 et= 0.344695543

smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 224.6194863 < 1.25*all bear. Cap Ok!

b) Max Moment case

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 14 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

P total = 4102.46

Mt live L = 1035.67

ML LL = 126.96

MT total =Mt LL+0.3Mtw+Mtwl = 1880.76

ML total=Mldl+MLll+0.3MLw+MLwl+MLlf = 1567.55898

el= 0.3821021 et= 0.458446428

smax=P/A[1+6et/L+6el/B)= 238.7184416 < 1.25*all bear. Cap Ok!

C) Stability against Sliding

FT driving = 0.3Ftw + Ftwl = 67.59 KN

FL driving = 0.3Flw + FLwl + FLlf = 114.32 KN

Fdriv. resultant = 132.81 KN

Fresisting = SUM V*tan f

Friction angle = 35 degrees (Table 5.5.2B)

Friction factor = 0.70

Sum V = 3209.66

F res = 2245.94603

S.F = 16.91 > 1.5 OK!

3.4 Check for group II (DL+W)

Case 1. Both superstructure placed

Dead L = 3122.13 Mom. Arm = 2m

M res = 6244.26993

M driving = MLw = 633.07

S.F = 9.86 > 2 Ok!

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 15 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

Case 2. Only one superstructure is placed

Dead L = 2593.70 Mresisting= 5187.39953

M driving = MLw = 551.19 KNM

S.F = 9.41 > 2 Ok!

Case 3. No superstructure is placed

Dead L = 1452.39 M resist = 2904.78673

M driving = MLw = 328.584788

S.F = 8.84 > 2 Ok!

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 16 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC PIER DESIGN Sta.
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT 10+940

SUMMERY OF LOADS
DL(Lt.Sup.) 191.11 146.21 191.11

DL(Rt.Sup.) 402.44 336.44 402.44


LL (HL-93) FLLRt FLLCt FLLLt FWLt= 25.01 FWLl= 10.00 FLF= 81.25
LL(Overload) FOLRt FOLCt FOLLt FWt= 97.01 FWl= 23.28
m a a= 2.6 3.68
41.94 1.35
MLONGT

MTRANS
4.11 4.11

5.37
0

FWl= 1.92 (PIER CAP)


1.15 (bracing)
1.92 (COLUMN)
FWt= 1.92 FWt= 1.92 5.37
Fst= 0.00 Fst= 0.00

1.20 4.20 1.2

FRt(kN) FCt (kN) FLt (kN) MTRANS.(kN/m) MLONGT. (kN/m)


(HL-93+ case I: a) 340.21 70.14 44.97 28.44 0.00 0.00 997.24 91.19 70.37 11.30
Lane L) / b) 336.00 70.14 44.71 28.44 0.00 0.00 986.30 91.19 84.64 11.30
Lane Load case II: a) 359.50 70.14 260.80 56.87 235.49 70.14 544.54 0.00 105.56 1.22
b) 354.99 70.14 257.62 56.87 232.91 70.14 1035.67 0.00 126.96 1.22

CORE CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLC 17 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC Pier Footing Design
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

RC FOOTING DESIGN FOR COLUMN PIER

Loading Case Summery Table. 1.1


Right leg Left Leg
Group Fy(kN) Mx(kNm) Mz(kNm) Fy(kN) Mx(kNm) Mz(kNm) 0.115214

17 I 2798.32 -638.99 18.19 1683.92 -638.04 -10.00


IV 2606.90 -510.22 -13.61 1893.31 -509.26 -5.42

Allowable Bearing Capacity = 6 kg/cm2 = 600.00 kN/m2

Design Constants

Concrete- Class "A" Concrete

f'c= 3481.1 psi = 24.00 Mpa

fc= 1392.44 (0.4*f'c) = 9.60 Mpa

Reinforcement- Grade 60 Steel

fy= 60000 psi = 400.00 Mpa

fs= 24000 " 165.46 "

Reinforcement- Grade 40 Steel

fy= 40000 psi = 276 Mpa


fs= 20000 " 137.89 "

for n= 9

k=nfc/(nfc+fs)= 0.343

j=1-k/3= 0.886

R=0.5*fc*j*k= 1458.31 kN/m2

FyR x R FyL
4.20

f(m)= 1.00 D=
x 1.00

Core Consulting Engineers 18 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC Pier Footing Design
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

1.00

B C
X
W=
Z 4.5
A D

B= 8.2

Self Weight Footng W (kN)= 885.6

Location of Resultant R & Eccentricity e

Group I V
x(m)= 1.580 1.76
ex(m)= -0.520 -0.34 < B/6 OK!
ez(m)= 0.285 0.23 < W/6 OK!
smax= 145.351 154.03 < sall OK!

Design Load = 154.03 kN/m2


ex = -0.266 m ez= 0.297 m åV=Fy1(I)+Fy4 (I)+W= 5367.84 kN

sA=åV/A(1-6*ex/B+6*ez/W)= 231.39 kN/m2


sB=åV/A(1-6*ex/B-6*ez/W)= 116.18 "
sC=åV/A(1+6*ex/B-6*ez/W)= 59.55 "
sD=åV/A(1+6*ex/B+6*ez/W)= 174.76 "
Depth Determination

1. Punching Shear (Art. 8.15.5.6.2)

v=V/bo*d bo=p(f+d)

design shear stress v < vcp=(0.80+2/bc)Öf'c£1.80Öf'c

bc -ratio of long side to short side of concentrated load= 1

(0.80+2/bc)= 2.8 > 1.8 take 1.8


f'c= 3481.1 psi
vcp= 106.20 psi = 732.19 kN/m2

Vact=Pcol-Psoil= 2345.83 kN where Pcol= 2798.32 kN


trial d= 0.934 m

Vres=vcp*bo*d= 4155.03 Vres ³ Vact OK!

Core Consulting Engineers 19 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC Pier Footing Design
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

davil=D-F/2-CLR CR= 0.935 m davil ³ d OK!

2. Wide Beam Shear


a. In the Short Direction

s1=åP/A(1 + 6*ez/W)= 203.08 kN/m2 d


s2=åP/A(1 - 6*ez/W)= 87.86 "

trial d= 0.935 m
s3= 182.21 s1 s3 s2

Vact= 1287.43 kN
vcb=0.95Öf'c= 56.05 psi = 386.43 kN/m2

Vres=vcb*B*d= 2962.769 kN Vres ³ Vact OK!

b. In the Long Direction


FyR= 2798.32 FyL= 1683.92

2 MzL= 18.18653 MzR= -10.0008

q2 q3
q4 q1

q1=s1*W=åP/A(1 + 6*ex/B)*W= 440.22 kN/m q3= 601.11 kN/m

q2=s2*W=åP/A(1 - 6*ex/B)*W= 653.00 " q4= 492.122

Shear Force and Bending Moment along the longer (Transverrsal) direction of Footing

751.57
1254.11

2 2.83 1.37 2 SFD

-932.35
-1544.21

Core Consulting Engineers 20 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC Pier Footing Design
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

945.30

BMD

-1254.11 428.6096

-1235.92 418.6088

Vmax= 1544.21 kN corresponding triangle leg = 1.25

Vact= -228.54 kN trial d = 0.935 m

Vres=vcb*W*d= 1625.91 kN

Vres ³ Vact OK!

3. Flexure

a. In the Short Direction

Using F = 30 mm and

Clear cover = 50 mm

davil=D-F/2-CLR CR= 0.935 m

beff=coln width+2(1/2*d)= 1.94 m

Loading
FyR= 2798.32 MxR= 638.98952 FyL= 1683.92 MxR= 638.045

Right Left
ez(m)= 0.2283 0.3789 1.75
smax=Fy/beff*W(1 + 6*ez/W)= 419.21 291.09
smin=Fy/beff*W(1 - 6*ez/W)= 223.52 95.69

qmax=smax*beff= 811.18 kN/m qmax q1= 567.72 qmin


qmin=smin*beff= 185.15 " 811.18 185.15

Mx-x= 1117.85 kNm

d=ÖMx-x/R*beff= 0.63 m davil ³ d OK!

Core Consulting Engineers 21 JAN., 2012


ETHIOPIAN ROAD AUTHORITY RC Pier Footing Design
CHANCHO-DERBA ROAD PROJECT Sta.10+940

b. In the Long Direction

Mmax= 1235.92 kNm

davil=D-3F/2-CLR CR= 0.905 m

d=ÖMmax/R*W= 0.43 m davil ³ d OK!

Reinforcement

Short Direction - (bottom)

M= 1117.85 kNm d= 0.935 m

As=M/fsjd*beff= 4216.23 mm2/m

spacing S=as/As= 167.65 mm

Use F 30 mm @ 20 cm for width= beff

Use As,min=0.002*1000*d= 1870 mm2/m S = 378.00 mm

Use F 30 mm @ 30 cm for the rest

Top :- temperature & shrinkage (Art.8.20.1)

As=1/8 in2/ft=2.65 cm2/m


Using F =12 mm S= 42.64 cm

Use F 12 mm @ 30 cm

Long Direction - (top)

M= 945.30 kNm d= 0.905 m

As= 869.24 mm2/m

As,min= 1810 mm2/m S= 390.53 mm

Use F 30 mm @ 30.00 cm

Bottom :-

M= 1235.92 kNm d= 0.905 m

As= 2070.91 mm2/m S= 341.33 mm

Use F 30 mm @ 30 cm

Core Consulting Engineers 22 JAN., 2012


1 1 DEAD LOAD 389.144
2 DEAD LOAD LEFT 397
3 DEAD LOAD LEFT AND RIGHT 683.95
4 LIVE LOAD CASE1-A 586.777
5 LIVE LOAD CASE1-B 576.089
6 LIVE LOAD CASE2-A 591.884
7 LIVE LOAD CASE-2-B 584.762
8 WIND LOAD ON LIVE VEHICLE 56.88
9 WIND LOAD ON STRUCTURES 176.512
10 1.25(DD+DDL)+1.75*(LL-CASE-1-A)) 2009.538
11 1.25*(DD+DDL)+1.75(LL-CASE-1-B) 1990.835
12 1.25(DD+DDL)+1.75(LL-CASE-2-A) 2018.477
13 1.25(DD+DDL)+1.75(LL-CASE2-B) 2006.014
14 1.25(DD+DDLR)+1.75(LL-CASE-1-A) 2368.226
15 1.25(DD+DDLR)+1.75(LL-CASE-1-B) 2349.523
16 1.25(DD+DDLR)+1.75(LL-CASE-2-A) 2377.165
17 1.25(DD+DDLR)+1.75(LL-CASE-2-B) 2364.701
18 1.25(DD+DDL)+1.35(CASE-1-A)+1.0(WA&WLL)+0.5*(WS) 1919.963
19 CASE1B 1905.535
20 CASE2-A-LEFT 1926.859
21 CASE-2-B-LEFT 1917.244
22 CASE-1-A-LR 2278.651
23 CASE-1-B-LR 2264.223
24 CASE-2-A-LR 2285.546
25 CASE-2-B-LR 2275.932
4 1 DEAD LOAD 389.144
2 DEAD LOAD LEFT 397
3 DEAD LOAD LEFT AND RIGHT 683.95
4 LIVE LOAD CASE1-A -157.067
5 LIVE LOAD CASE1-B -154.249
6 LIVE LOAD CASE2-A 117.256
7 LIVE LOAD CASE-2-B 111.808
8 WIND LOAD ON LIVE VEHICLE -56.88
9 WIND LOAD ON STRUCTURES -176.512
10 1.25(DD+DDL)+1.75*(LL-CASE-1-A)) 707.813
11 1.25*(DD+DDL)+1.75(LL-CASE-1-B) 712.744
12 1.25(DD+DDL)+1.75(LL-CASE-2-A) 1187.877
13 1.25(DD+DDL)+1.75(LL-CASE2-B) 1178.343
14 1.25(DD+DDLR)+1.75(LL-CASE-1-A) 1066.501
15 1.25(DD+DDLR)+1.75(LL-CASE-1-B) 1071.431
16 1.25(DD+DDLR)+1.75(LL-CASE-2-A) 1546.564
17 1.25(DD+DDLR)+1.75(LL-CASE-2-B) 1537.03
18 1.25(DD+DDL)+1.35(CASE-1-A)+1.0(WA&WLL)+0.5*(WS) 625.504
19 CASE1B 629.308
20 CASE2-A-LEFT 995.839
21 CASE-2-B-LEFT 988.484
22 CASE-1-A-LR 984.192
23 CASE-1-B-LR 987.995
24 CASE-2-A-LR 1354.526
25 CASE-2-B-LR 1347.172
-176.512
-176.512
0 -2.14
0 -1.343
0 -2.406
-187.991 -25.299
-222.009 -24.847
-193.156 -21.031
-333.014 -20.986
59.757 -66.075
395.58 -253.797
-328.984 -48.627
-388.516 -47.836
-338.023 -41.159
-582.774 -41.08
-328.984 -49.956
-388.516 -49.165
-338.023 -42.487
-582.774 -42.408
3.759 -231.482
-42.166 -230.872
-3.214 -225.721
-192.022 -225.659
3.759 -232.81
-42.166 -232.2
-3.214 -227.049
-192.022 -226.988
0 2.14
0 1.343
0 2.406
-187.991 -5.281
-222.009 -5.183
-193.156 -0.139
-333.014 -0.126
59.757 -67.629
395.58 -254.814
-328.984 -4.888
-388.516 -4.716
-338.023 4.111
-582.774 4.133
-328.984 -3.559
-388.516 -3.388
-338.023 5.44
-582.774 5.462
3.759 -197.811
-42.166 -197.679
-3.214 -190.869
-192.022 -190.852
3.759 -196.483
-42.166 -196.351
-3.214 -189.541
-192.022 -189.524
395.58 5.462
-582.774 5.462

2377.165 -338.023 -42.487


1546.564 -338.023 5.44

176.512 395.58 -253.797


-176.512 395.58 -254.814

1537.03 -582.774 5.462


5.462

You might also like