Chapter Iv

CHAPTER IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA GATHERED
1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents
1.1 Sex
Table 1 displays the frequency distribution of the respondents in accordance to
their sex.
Table 1
Frequency Distribution of the Respondents in terms of Sex
Sex Frequency Percentage

Male 43 42.6%
Female 58 57.4%
Total 101 100%
As shown in Table 6, in the total of 101 respondents in this study, 43 (42.6%) are
males while the 78 (57.4%) are females.
1.2 Age
Table 2 shows the frequency distribution of the respondents in terms of their age.
Table 2
Frequency Distribution of the Respondents in terms of Age
Age Frequency Percentage

24 to 29 years old 30 29.7%
30 to 35 years old 32 31.7%
36 years old and above 39 38.6%
Total 101 100%
Based on Table 2, in the total of 101 respondents in this study, 30 (29.7%) are 24
to 29 years old, 32 (31.7%) are 30 to 35 years old, and 39 (38.6%) age 36 years
old and above.
1.3 Occupancy Status
Table 3 depicts the frequency distribution of the respondents in terms of their
occupancy status.
Table 3
Frequency Distribution of the Respondents in terms of Occupancy Status
Occupancy Status Frequency Percentage

Unit Owner 21 20.8%
Tenant 80 79.2%
Total 101 100%
As per Table 3, in the total of 101 respondents in this study, 21 (20.8%) are Unit
Owners while the 80 (79.2%) are Tenants.
2. Respondents’ Assessment on the Effectiveness of Knowledge
Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences
Condominium Corporation
2.1 Fire Drill
Table 4 presents the assessment of the respondents on the effectiveness of
Knowledge Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences
Condominium Corporation in terms of conducting Fire Drill.

Table 4
Respondents’ Assessment on the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management in
the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium Corporation in
terms of Fire Drill
Weighted Verbal
Fire Drill Rank
Mean Interpretation
1. The Property Management conducts fire drill program in the building 2.65* 1 Somewhat Agree
2. The Emergency Response Team responded and carried out
2.52* 4 Somewhat Agree
assigned duties during the fire drill
3. Evacuation signs are in good condition and exits are properly
illuminated
4. During the fire drill, the fire alarm is clearly heard in all areas of the
building
5. Residents evacuated in the designated meeting place located at the
safe distance from the building
Overall Weighted Mean 2.57* Somewhat Agree
*Legend: 4.50 to 5.00 = Strongly Agree; 3.50 to 4.49 = Agree; 2.50 to 3.49 = Somewhat Agree; 1.50 to 2.49 = Disagree; 1.00 to 1.49 = Strongly Disagree
Based on the tabulated summary of responses presented on Table 4, the respondents
are just somewhat agreeing that: the property management conducts fire drill program
in the building (WM=2.65; VI=Somewhat Agree), the emergency response time
responded and carried out duties during the fire drill (WM=2.52; VI=Somewhat Agree),
the evacuation signs are in good condition and exits are properly illuminated
(WM=2.59; VI=Somewhat Agree), the fire alarm is clearly heard in all areas of the
building (WM=2.60; VI=Somewhat Agree), and residents evacuated in the designated
meeting place located at the safe distance from the building (WM=2.47; VI=Somewhat
Agree). In general, the overall weighted mean is 2.57 which has a verbal interpretation
of “Somewhat Agree”. This may imply that the effectiveness of Knowledge
Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium
Corporation in terms of conducting Fire Drills is just somewhat agreeable for the
respondents in average.
*Add at least 1 supporting related literature here*
2.2 Earthquake Drill
Table 5 depicts the assessment of the respondents on the effectiveness of
Condominium Corporation in terms of conducting Earthquake Drill.
Table 5
terms of Earthquake Drill
Weighted Verbal
Earthquake Drill Rank
Mean Interpretation
1. Getting enough information from INGO (International Non-
Governmental Organization)/NGO (Non-governmental organization) 3.29* 5 Somewhat Agree
about earthquake
2. The Property Management have an adequate supplies and medical
kit for evacuation
3. Is the siren loud enough to be heard by all drill participants 3.71* 1 Agree
4. Aware of the shelter and open space in case of disaster. 3.57* 3 Agree
5. Knowledge about an evacuation area during an earthquake. 3.58* 2 Agree
Overall Weighted Mean 3.51* Agree

As per the tabulated summary of responses presented on Table 5, the respondents
agreed the most that the siren is loud enough to be heard by all earthquake drill
participants in the building, having the highest weighted mean of 3.71 with a verbal
interpretation of “Agree”. Also, the respondents agree that the property management is
knowledgeable about an evacuation area during an earthquake as well as aware of the
shelter and open space area in case of disaster, having weighted means of 3.58 and
3.57 respectively which both has a verbal interpretation of “Agree”. On the other hand,
the respondents just somewhat agreed that the property management have an
adequate supplies and medical kit for evacuation and are getting enough information
from Getting enough information from INGO (International Non-Governmental
Organization) or NGO (Non-governmental organization) about earthquake, having
weighted means of 3.38 and 3.29 respectively, both having verbal interpretation of
“Somewhat Agree”. In general, the overall weighted mean is 3.51 which has a verbal
interpretation of “Agree”. This may imply that the effectiveness of Knowledge
Corporation in terms of conducting Earthquake Drills is agreeable for the respondents
in average.
2.3 Circular Memorandum
Table 6 displays the assessment of the respondents on the effectiveness of
Condominium Corporation in terms of having Circular Memorandum.
Table 6
terms of Circular Memorandum
Weighted Verbal
Circular Memorandum Rank
Mean Interpretation
1. We regularly receive circulars from the management regarding
3.56* 4 Agree
safety precautions.
2. We always receive circulars as soon as there are newly
3.53* 5 Agree
implemented safety rules.
3. We receive circulars from the management updating all the
3.57* 3 Agree
tenants/residents on the safety condition of all the facilities.
4. In disseminating circular memos, the Property Management is clear
3.64* 1 Agree
and concise on details.
5. The residents are notified in advance of the scheduled water outage 3.58* 2 Agree
due to overhead tank cleaning.
Based on Table 6, the respondents agreed the most that the property management is
clear and concise on details in disseminating circular memos, having the highest
weighted mean of 3.64 which has a verbal interpretation of “Agree”. Also, the
respondents agree that they are being notified in advance of the scheduled water
outage due to overhead tank cleaning, they receive updates regarding the safety
condition of all the facilities as well as regular reminders regarding safety precautions,
and immediate heads up as soon as there are newly implemented rules, having
weighted means of 3.58, 3.57, 3.56, and 3.53 respectively which all has verbal
interpretation of “Agree”. In general, the overall weighted mean is 3.58 which has a
verbal interpretation of “Agree”. This may imply that the effectiveness of Knowledge
Corporation in terms of having Circular Memorandum is agreeable for the respondents
in average.
2.4 Safety Protocol
Table 7 shows the assessment of the respondents on the effectiveness of
Condominium Corporation in terms of implementing Safety Protocol.

Table 7
terms of Safety Protocol
Weighted Verbal
Safety Protocol Rank
Mean Interpretation
1. We are expected to use fire exits if there are emergencies in the
3.89* 3 Agree
building.
2. We are taught how to use a fire extinguisher. 2.95* 5 Agree
3. We usually see safety warnings/signages (e.g., fire exits, fire
3.90* 2 Agree
extinguishers.
4. We know the emergency hotlines (e.g., fire station, hospital, police
3.92* 1 Agree
station, etc.)
5. Safety officers frequently conduct inspections in order to make sure
3.85* 4 Agree
that we are safe in Icon Residence.
Based on the presented results of survey on Table 7, the respondents agreed the most
that they were advised by the property management about the emergency hotlines
(e.g., fire station, hospital, police station, etc.), having the highest weighted mean of
3.92 which has a verbal interpretation of “Agree”. Also, respondents admit that they
usually see safety warnings/signages (e.g., fire exits, fire extinguishers) around the
building, they were advised to use fire exits if there are emergencies in the building,
and safety officers frequently conduct inspections in order to make sure that they are
safe in the residence, having weighted means of 3.90, 3.89, and 3.85 respectively
which has verbal interpretation of “Agree”. On the other hand, teaching the residents
how to use a fire extinguisher seems to be the least safety protocol implemented being
leas t agreed by the respondents as it garnered the least weighted mean of 2.95
having a verbal interpretation of “Agree”. In general, the overall weighted mean is 3.70
which has a verbal interpretation of “Agree”. This may imply that the effectiveness of
Condominium Corporation in terms of implementing Safety Protocols is agreeable for
the respondents in average.
2.5 Preventive Maintenance
Table 8 presents the assessment of the respondents on the effectiveness of
Condominium Corporation in terms of Preventive Maintenance.
Table 8
terms of Preventive Maintenance
Weighted Verbal
Preventive Maintenance Rank
Mean Interpretation
1. Tasks for preventive maintenance reduce unplanned shutdowns
and maintain high levels of efficiency.
2. The Property Management’s Preventive Maintenance plan is
proactive
3. The Property Management plans and carries out equipment
inspections on a regular basis.
4. Conducts regular cleaning of buildings, grounds and assets 3.61* 1 Agree
5. Repair and replace any defective equipment parts 3.49* 2 Somewhat Agree

As per the presented survey results on Table 8, the respondents agreed the most that
the property management conducts regular cleaning of buildings, grounds, and assets,
as for preventive maintenance, having the highest weighted mean of 3.61 which has a
verbal interpretation of “Agree”. Meanwhile, the respondents seem to just somewhat
agreeing that the property management: repair and replace any defective equipment
parts, plans and carries out equipment inspection on regular basis, has tasks for
preventive maintenance reduce unplanned shutdowns and maintain high levels of
efficiency, and has proactive preventive maintenance plan, having weighted means of
3.49, 3.43, 3.41, and 3.37 which all has verbal interpretation of ‘Agree”. In general, the
overall weighted mean is 3.46, having a verbal interpretation of “Somewhat Agree”.
This may imply that the effectiveness of Knowledge Management in the Safety-Critical
Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium Corporation in terms of practicing
Preventive Maintenance is just somewhat agreeable for the respondents in average.
3. Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management of Critical Facilities
3.1 Performance
Table 9 depicts the factors affecting the Knowledge Management of critical
facilities in terms of Performance, as perceived by the respondents.
Table 9
Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management of Critical Facilities
in terms of Performance as Perceived by the Respondents
Weighted Verbal
Performance Rank
Mean Interpretation
1. Does good job performance of the management lead to job security
4.04* 2 Agree
for the residents?
2. Is it likely that good performance does not lead to accident? 4.28* 1 Agree
3. Is achieving quality work a priority? 3.96* 3 Agree
4. Are those in charge of using new equipment properly trained? 3.85* 4 Agree
5. Does the company make any attempts to stop failures and
3.83* 5 Agree
breakdowns from happening again?
Based on Table 9, the respondents agreed the most that the property management’s
good performance does not lead to accident, having the highest weighted mean of 4.28
which has a verbal interpretation of “Agree”. Moreover, respondents also agree that
good job performance of the management leads to job security for the residents,
achieving quality work is being prioritized, those in charge of using new equipment are
trained, and also the management attempts to stop failures and breakdowns from
happening again, having weighted means of 4.04, 3.96, 3.85, and 2.83 which all has
verbal interpretation of “Agree”. In general, the overall weighted mean is 3.99 having a
verbal interpretation of “Agree”. This may imply that respondents agree in average that
Performance of the property management is a contributing factor to the Knowledge
Management of critical facilities, based on their perception. *Add at least 1 supporting
related literature here*
3.2 Practices
facilities in terms of Practices, as perceived by the respondents.
Table 10
in terms of Practices as Perceived by the Respondents
Weighted Verbal
Practices Rank
Mean Interpretation
1. The housekeeping activities such as pest control is effective. 3.66* 4 Agree
2. Responds immediately to the technical issues that occurred. 3.69* 3 Agree

3. The admin and security are strict in regards to the permit request,
3.85* 1 Agree
rules and regulations.
4. The Property Management effectively conducts 52 Weeks
3.52* 5 Agree
Maintenance checklist.
5. Effective safety management program includes training or seminar
3.73* 2 Agree
regarding safety and risk management
As per the results presented in Table 10, respondents mostly agree that the admin and
security practice being strict with regards to permit request, rules, and regulations,
having the highest weighted mean of 3.85 which has a verbal interpretation of “Agree”.
Moreover, respondents seem to also agree that the property management practices
effective safety management program that includes training or seminar regarding
safety and risk management, responds immediately to the technical issues occurred
within the residence, practices effective housekeeping activities such as pest control,
and conducts 52-week maintenance checklist, having weighted means of 3.73, 3.69,
3.66, and 3.52 which all has verbal interpretations of “Agree”. In general, the overall
weighted mean is 3.69 which is interpreted as “Agree”. This may imply that
respondents agree in average that Practices of the property management is a
contributing factor to the Knowledge Management of critical facilities, based on their
perception. *Add at least 1 supporting related literature here*

3.3 Planning
Table 11 shows the factors affecting the Knowledge Management of critical
facilities in terms of Planning, as perceived by the respondents.
Table 11
in terms of Planning as Perceived by the Respondents
Weighted Verbal
Planning Rank
Mean Interpretation
1. Proactively finding opportunities to be improve. 3.54* 4 Agree
2. Meeting the objectives and goal of the organization. 3.50* 5 Agree

3. Helpfully designed a safety plan to deal with emergencies such as
3.58* 2.5 Agree
fire and flooding.
4. Establishing new rules and regulation for effecting the plan. 3.59* 1 Agree
5. Effectively implementing the plan. 3.58* 2.5 Agree

As shown in Table 11, respondents agree the most that the management establishes
and effectively plans new rules and regulations for critical facilities, having the highest
weighted mean of 3.59 which can be interpreted as “Agree”. In addition, the
respondents also agree that the property management helpfully designed a safely plan
to deal with emergencies such as fire and flooding as well as effectively implementing
plans, proactively finding opportunities to improve, and meeting the objectives and
goals of their organization, having weighted means of 3.58, 3.54, and 3.50 which all
has verbal interpretations of “Agree”. The overall weighted mean is 3.56 which
indicates an average response of “Agree”. This may imply that respondents agree in
average that Planning of the property management is a contributing factor to the
Knowledge Management of critical facilities, based on their perception.
3.4 Proactiveness
facilities in terms of Proactiveness, as perceived by the respondents.
Table 12
in terms of Proactiveness as Perceived by the Respondents
Weighted Verbal
Proactiveness Rank
Mean Interpretation
1. The security personnel immediately respond to emergency
3.82* 5 Agree
situations.
2. The security personnel consistently follow the incident report
3.84* 3.5 Agree
system.
3. The management strictly implemented security measures for
3.84* 3.5 Agree
everyone when accessing the building.
4. The management is able to evaluate and identify various courses of
3.87* 2 Agree
action, as well as potential outcomes in order to minimize risk.
5. The management is able to provide immediate updates with regards
3.89* 1 Agree
to security and safety measures.
Based on Table 12, respondents agree the most that the management provides
immediate updates with regards to security and safety measures for critical facilities,
Also, respondents agree that the management evaluates and identifies various courses
or actions as well as potential outcomes in order to minimize risk, strictly implemented
security measures for everyone when accessing the building, has security personnel
that consistently follow incident report system and immediately respond to emergency
situations, having weighted means of 3.87, 3.84, and 3.82, all having verbal
interpretations of “Agree”. The resulting overall weighted mean is 3.85 which indicates
an average response of “Agree”. This may imply that that respondents agree in
average that the Proactiveness of the property management is a contributing factor to
the Knowledge Management of critical facilities, based on their perception. *Add at
least 1 supporting related literature here*
3.5 Communication
Table 13 presents the factors affecting the Knowledge Management of critical
facilities in terms of Communication, as perceived by the respondents.
Table 13
in terms of Communication as Perceived by the Respondents
Weighted Verbal
Communication Rank
Mean Interpretation
1 The property management is responsive to email in regards to the
concerns of residents
2. The property management creates a community group chat to
handle residents' concerns well.
3. Property management executes in-person and virtual town hall
meetings with the residents effectively.
4. Utilizing intranet messages to securely distribute the information
regarding safety and security measures to staff.
5. The property management staff immediately responds to the phone
3.53* 1 Agree
call on site.
As per the survey results presented on Table 13, respondents mostly agree that the
management staffs immediately respond to the phone call on site for critical facilities,
On the other hand, respondents just somewhat agree that the management: is
responsive to email regarding residents’ concerns, creates a community group chat to
handle residents’ concerns well, utilizes intranet messages to securely distribute the
information regarding safety and security measures to staffs, and executes in-person
and in-virtual town hall meetings with the residents effectively, having weighted means
of 3.49, 3.39, 3.37, and 3.32 which has a verbal interpretation of “Somewhat Agree”. In
general, the overall weighted mean is 3.42 which indicates an average response of
“Somewhat Agree”. This may imply that that respondents are just somewhat agree in
average that the property management’s Communication factor effectively affects the
Knowledge Management of critical facilities, based on their perception.

4. Relationship between the Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management of
Critical Facilities and the Effectiveness of the Knowledge Management in
the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium Corporation
Table 14 shows results of the test of significant relationship between the factors
affecting the Knowledge Management of critical facilities and its effectiveness to
the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium Corporation as
assessed by the respondents.
Table 14
Relationship between Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management and the
Effectiveness of the Knowledge Management to the Safety-Critical Facilities as
Assessed by the Respondents
Variables being Tested Correlation

P-value
Coefficient Relationship Decision Remarks
Independent (2-tailed)
Dependent Variables (Spearman’s Rho)
Variables
Negatively Failed to
Fire Drill -0.002* 0.980** No Significant Relationship
Very Weak Reject Ho
Positively Failed to
Earthquake Drill 0.037* 0.713** No Significant Relationship
Very Weak Reject Ho
Positively
Performance Circular Memorandum 0.043* 0.000** Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Very Weak
Positively
Safety Protocol 0.247* 0.013** Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Weak
Positively
Preventive Maintenance 0.445* 0.000** Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Moderate
Very Weak Reject Ho
Positively
Earthquake Drill 0.409* 0.000** Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Moderate
Positively
Practices Circular Memorandum 0.520* 0.000** Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Moderate
Positively
Strong
Positively
Moderate
Very Weak Reject Ho
Positively
Earthquake Drill 0.416* 0.000** Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Moderate
Positively
Planning Circular Memorandum 0.476* 0.000** Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Moderate
Positively
Strong
Positively
Strong
Pro-activeness Negatively Failed to
Very Weak Reject Ho
Earthquake Drill 0.371* Positively 0.000** Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Weak
Positively
Circular Memorandum 0.412* 0.000** Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Moderate
Positively
Strong
Positively
Moderate
Positively Failed to
Fire Drill 0.075* 0.454** No Significant Relationship
Very Weak Reject Ho
Positively 0.000**
Earthquake Drill 0.531* Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Moderate
Positively 0.000**
Communication Circular Memorandum 0.645* Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Strong
Positively 0.000**
Safety Protocol 0.599* Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Moderate
Positively 0.000**
Preventive Maintenance 0.559* Reject Ho Significant Relationship
Moderate
*Legend: 0.00 to ±0.19 = Very Weak Correlation; ±0.20 to ±0.39 = Weak Correlation; ±0.40 to ±0.59 = Moderate Correlation;
±0.60 to ±0.79 = Strong Correlation; ±0.80 to ±1.0 = Very strong correlation
**Relationship is significant at 0.05 level of significance (2-tailed)
As shown in the presented results in Table 14, testing the relationship between the
factors affecting the Knowledge Management of critical facilities and the effectiveness
of their Knowledge Management to the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences
Condominium Corporation using Spearman’s Rank-Order Correlation Coefficient
(Spearman’s Rho), the property management’s Performance was found significantly
correlated with the effectiveness of their Circular Memorandum (having a correlation
coefficient of 0.043 which can be interpreted as Positively Very Weak correlation yet
has resulting P-value of 0.000 that is less than the significance level of 0.05 which
indicates rejection of the null hypothesis for these variables tested), their Safety
Protocol (having a correlation coefficient of 0.247 which can be interpreted as
Positively Weak correlation yet has resulting P-value of 0.013 that is less than the
significance level of 0.05 which indicates rejection of the null hypothesis for these
variables tested), and their Preventive Maintenance (having a correlation coefficient
of 0.445 which can be interpreted as Positively Moderate correlation and has resulting
P-value of 0.000 that is less than the significance level of 0.05 which indicates rejection
of the null hypothesis for these variables tested). Meaning, the performance factor of
the property management has a weak to moderate influence on the effectiveness of
their Circular Memorandum, Safety Protocol, and Preventive Maintenance assessed by
the respondents. Meanwhile, the performance factor was found not significantly
correlated with the effectiveness of Fire Drill and Earthquake Drill of the management.
This may indicate that there might be other factors that may be more highly influential
to the effectiveness of their Fire Drill and Earthquake drill for the respondents.
Moreover, the property management’s Practices was found significantly correlated
with the effectiveness of their Earthquake Drill (having a correlation coefficient of
0.409 which can be interpreted as Positively Moderate correlation and has resulting P-
value of 0.000 that is less than the significance level of 0.05 which indicates rejection of
the null hypothesis for these variables tested), their Circular Memorandum (having a
correlation coefficient of 0.520 which can be interpreted as Positively Moderate
correlation and has resulting P-value of 0.000 that is less than the significance level of
0.05 which indicates rejection of the null hypothesis for these variables tested), their
Safety Protocol (having a correlation coefficient of 0.626 which can be interpreted as
Positively Strong correlation and has resulting P-value of 0.000 that is less than the
of the null hypothesis for these variables tested). Meaning, the practices factor of the
property management has a moderate to strong influence on the effectiveness of their

Earthquake Drill, Circular Memorandum, Safety Protocol, and Preventive Maintenance
assessed by the respondents. Meanwhile, the practices factor was found not
significantly correlated with the effectiveness of Fire Drill of the management. This may
indicate that there might be other factors that possibly more influential to the
effectiveness of their Fire Drill for the respondents.
Next, the property management’s Planning was found significantly correlated with the
effectiveness of their Earthquake Drill (having a correlation coefficient of 0.416 which
can be interpreted as Positively Moderate correlation and has resulting P-value of
0.000 that is less than the significance level of 0.05 which indicates rejection of the null
hypothesis for these variables tested), their Circular Memorandum (having a
0.05 which indicates rejection of the null hypothesis for these variables tested), their
Safety Protocol (having a correlation coefficient of 0.653 which can be interpreted as
Positively Strong correlation and has resulting P-value of 0.000 that is less than the
of 0.612 which can be interpreted as Positively Strong correlation and has resulting P-
the null hypothesis for these variables tested). Meaning, the planning factor of the
property management has a moderate to strong influence on the effectiveness of their
assessed by the respondents. Meanwhile, the planning factor was found not
Furthermore, the property management’s Pro-activeness was found significantly
correlated with the effectiveness of their Earthquake Drill (having a correlation
coefficient of 0.371 which can be interpreted as Positively Weak correlation yet has
resulting P-value of 0.000 that is less than the significance level of 0.05 which indicates
rejection of the null hypothesis for these variables tested), their Circular
Memorandum (having a correlation coefficient of 0.412 which can be interpreted as
Positively Moderate correlation and has resulting P-value of 0.000 that is less than the
variables tested), their Safety Protocol (having a correlation coefficient of 0.660 which
can be interpreted as Positively Strong correlation and has resulting P-value of 0.000
that is less than the significance level of 0.05 which indicates rejection of the null
hypothesis for these variables tested), and their Preventive Maintenance (having a
0.05 which indicates rejection of the null hypothesis for these variables tested).
Meaning, the pro-activeness factor of the property management has a weak to strong
influence on the effectiveness of their Earthquake Drill, Circular Memorandum, Safety
Protocol, and Preventive Maintenance assessed by the respondents. Meanwhile, the
pro-activeness factor was found not significantly correlated with the effectiveness of
Fire Drill of the management. This may indicate that there might be other factors that
possibly more influential to the effectiveness of their Fire Drill for the respondents.
Lastly, the property management’s Communication was found significantly correlated
with the effectiveness of their Earthquake Drill (having a correlation coefficient of
0.531 which can be interpreted as Positively Moderate correlation and has resulting P-
the null hypothesis for these variables tested), their Circular Memorandum (having a
correlation coefficient of 0.645 which can be interpreted as Positively Strong correlation
and has resulting P-value of 0.000 that is less than the significance level of 0.05 which
indicates rejection of the null hypothesis for these variables tested), their Safety
Protocol (having a correlation coefficient of 0.599 which can be interpreted as
Positively Moderate correlation and has resulting P-value of 0.000 that is less than the
of the null hypothesis for these variables tested). Meaning, the communication factor of
the property management has a weak to strong influence on the effectiveness of their
assessed by the respondents. Meanwhile, the pro-activeness factor was found not


Chapter Iv

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter Iv

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA GATHERED

1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents

Table 1 displays the frequency distribution of the respondents in accordance to

Frequency Distribution of the Respondents in terms of Sex

Sex Frequency Percentage

males while the 78 (57.4%) are females.

Frequency Distribution of the Respondents in terms of Age

Age Frequency Percentage

old and above.

1.3 Occupancy Status

Table 3 depicts the frequency distribution of the respondents in terms of their

Frequency Distribution of the Respondents in terms of Occupancy Status

Occupancy Status Frequency Percentage

Owners while the 80 (79.2%) are Tenants.

2. Respondents’ Assessment on the Effectiveness of Knowledge

Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences

2.1 Fire Drill

Table 4 presents the assessment of the respondents on the effectiveness of

Knowledge Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences

Condominium Corporation in terms of conducting Fire Drill.

Respondents’ Assessment on the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management in

the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium Corporation in

terms of Fire Drill

Based on the tabulated summary of responses presented on Table 4, the respondents

in the building (WM=2.65; VI=Somewhat Agree), the emergency response time

building (WM=2.60; VI=Somewhat Agree), and residents evacuated in the designated

of “Somewhat Agree”. This may imply that the effectiveness of Knowledge

Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium

2.2 Earthquake Drill

Table 5 depicts the assessment of the respondents on the effectiveness of

Knowledge Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences

Condominium Corporation in terms of conducting Earthquake Drill.

Respondents’ Assessment on the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management in

the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium Corporation in

terms of Earthquake Drill

5. Knowledge about an evacuation area during an earthquake. 3.58* 2 Agree

Overall Weighted Mean 3.51* Agree

As per the tabulated summary of responses presented on Table 5, the respondents

knowledgeable about an evacuation area during an earthquake as well as aware of the

from Getting enough information from INGO (International Non-Governmental

Organization) or NGO (Non-governmental organization) about earthquake, having

interpretation of “Agree”. This may imply that the effectiveness of Knowledge

Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium

Corporation in terms of conducting Earthquake Drills is agreeable for the respondents

*Add at least 1 supporting related literature here*

2.3 Circular Memorandum

Table 6 displays the assessment of the respondents on the effectiveness of

Knowledge Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences

Condominium Corporation in terms of having Circular Memorandum.

Respondents’ Assessment on the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management in

the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium Corporation in

terms of Circular Memorandum

Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium

Corporation in terms of having Circular Memorandum is agreeable for the respondents

*Add at least 1 supporting related literature here*

2.4 Safety Protocol

Table 7 shows the assessment of the respondents on the effectiveness of

Knowledge Management in the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences

Condominium Corporation in terms of implementing Safety Protocol.

Respondents’ Assessment on the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management in

the Safety-Critical Facilities in Icon Residences Condominium Corporation in

terms of Safety Protocol

Add at least 1 supporting related literature here

Add at least 1 supporting related literature here

Add at least 1 supporting related literature here

Add at least 1 supporting related literature here

perception. Add at least 1 supporting related literature here

Add at least 1 supporting related literature here

Add at least 1 supporting related literature here