You are on page 1of 125

RC FRAME ANALYSIS

Assoc. Prof. Ts. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim


Forensic Engineering Centre (FEC)
School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my
Introduction
3D Frame: Beam, Column
& Slab

2D Frame Analysis

Building Construction

3D Frame: Beam &


Column ONLY
2D Frame Analysis
Introduction: Substitute Frame

2D Frame Analysis

Sub-frame: Roof Level

Sub-frame: Other Floor Level


Types of Frame

Braced Frame
• NOT contribute to the overall structural
stability
• None lateral actions are transmitted to
columns & beams
• Support vertical actions only
Shear wall as
bracing members

Unbraced Frame
• Contribute to the overall structural
stability
• All lateral actions are transmitted to
columns & beams
• Support vertical & lateral actions
Methods of Analysis

(i) One-level Sub-frame

(ii) Two-points Sub-frame

Kb1 0.5Kb2 0.5Kb1 Kb2 0.5Kb3


Methods of Analysis

(iii) Continuous Beam and One-point Sub-frame

0.5Kb
0.5Kb 0.5Kb 0.5Kb
Combination of Actions

BS EN 1992-1-1: Cl. 5.1.3


Load Set 1: Alternate or adjacent spans loaded

❑ Alternate span carrying the design variable and permanent


load (1.35Gk + 1.5Qk), other spans carrying only the design
permanent loads (1.35Gk)

❑ Any two adjacent spans carrying the design variable and


permanent loads (1.35Gk + 1.5Qk), all other spans carrying only
the design permanent load (1.35Gk)
Combination of Actions

Load Set 1

Alternate Span Loaded Adjacent Span Loaded

1.5Qk 1.5Qk
1.35Gk
Combination of Actions

MALAYSIAN / UK NATIONAL ANNEX

Load set 2: All or alternate spans loaded

❑ All span carrying the design variable and permanent loads


(1.35Gk + 1.5Qk)

❑ Alternate span carrying the design variable and permanent


load (1.35Gk + 1.5Qk), other spans carrying only the design
permanent loads (1.35Gk)
Combination of Actions

Load Set 2
All Spans Loaded

1.5Qk
1.35Gk

Alternate Span Loaded


Example 1
ACTION ON BEAMS
Example 1

2@4 m = 8 m
6m 6m 6m
1m Level 7

Level 6

6@3.5 m = 21 m
Level 5

Level 4

7@5 m = 35 m
Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

4m
2@4 m = 8 m

6m 6m 6m
Example 1: Action on Beams

Loading Data

Finishes, ceiling & services= 0.75 kN/m2


Concrete density = 25 kN/m3
Variable action = 4 kN/m2
Partition = 0.50 kN/m2

Structural Dimensions

Slab thickness, h = 150 mm


Beam size, b  h = 250  600 mm
Column size, b  h = 300  400 mm
Example 1: Action on Beams

Load on Slab

Slab self weight = 0.15 m  25 kN/m3 = 3.75 kN/m2


Finishes, ceiling, services = 1.25 kN/m2
Characteristics permanent action, gk = 5.00 kN/m2

Imposed load = 4.00 kN/m2


Partition = 0.50 kN/m2
Characteristics variable action, qk = 4.50 kN/m2
Other Loads on Beam

Beam self weight = 0.25 m  (0.60 – 0.15) m  25 kN/m3 = 2.81 kN/m


Example 1: Action on Beams

𝐿𝑦 6 𝐿𝑦 6 𝐿𝑦 6
= = 1.50 (𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑒 2) = = 1.50 (𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑒 1) = = 1.50 (𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑒 2)
𝐿𝑥 4 𝐿𝑥 4 𝐿𝑥 4

4m
0.47 0.45 0.47

0.42 0.39 0.42


5m

6m 6m 6m

𝐿𝑦 6 𝐿𝑦 6 𝐿𝑦 6
= = 1.20 (𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑒 2) = = 1.20 (𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑒 1) = = 1.20 (𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑒 2)
𝐿𝑥 5 𝐿𝑥 5 𝐿𝑥 5
Example 1: Action on Beams

Gk = Permanent action on slab + Beam self weight


= (0.47  5.00  4) + (0.42  5.00  5) + 2.81 = 22.71 kN/m
Qk = Variable action on slab
= (0.47  4.50  4) + (0.42  4.50  5) = 17.91 kN/m

0.47 0.45 0.47

0.42 0.39 0.42

Gk = Permanent action on slab + Beam self weight


= (0.45  5.00  4) + (0.39  5.00  5) + 2.81 = 21.56 kN/m
Qk = Variable action on slab
= (0.45  4.50  4) + (0.39  4.50  5) = 16.88 kN/m
Example 1: Action on Beams

wmax = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk = 57.53 kN/m wmax = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk = 57.53 kN/m
wmin = 1.35Gk = 30.66 kN/m wmin = 1.35Gk = 30.66 kN/m

wmax = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk = 54.42 kN/m


wmin = 1.35Gk = 29.11 kN/m

6m 6m 6m
Example 2
ANALYSIS OF ONE-LEVEL
SUB-FRAME
Example 2

2@4 m = 8 m
6m 6m 6m
1m
Level 7

Level 6

6@3.5 m = 21 m
Level 5

Level 4

7@5 m = 35 m
Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

4m
2@4 m = 8 m

6m 6m 6m
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Analysis using LOAD SET 1

wmax = 57.53 kN/m wmax = 57.53 kN/m


wmin = 30.66 kN/m wmax = 54.42 kN/m wmin = 30.66 kN/m Kc,u
3.5 m
wmin = 29.11 kN/m

KAB KBC KCD


Kc,l
4m

6m 6m 6m

A B C D
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Structural Dimension
Beam: 250 mm  600 mm
Column: 300 mm 400 mm

Moment of Inertia, I = bh3/12


250×6003
Beam: = 4.5 × 109 𝑚𝑚4
12
300×4003
Column: = 1.6 × 109 𝑚𝑚4
12

Stiffness, K = I/L
4.5×109
Beam: 𝐾𝐴𝐵 = 𝐾𝐵𝐶 = 𝐾𝐶𝐷 = 6000 = 7.5 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
1.6×109
Column: 𝐾𝑐,𝑢 = = 4.6 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
3500
1.6×109
𝐾𝑐,𝑙 = 4000 = 4.0 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Distribution Factor, F = K/K
𝐾𝐴𝐵, 𝐶𝐷
Joint A & Joint D: 𝐹𝐴𝐵, 𝐶𝐷 = = 0.47
𝐾𝐴𝐵, 𝐶𝐷 +𝐾𝑐,𝑢 +𝐾𝑐,𝑙
𝐾𝑐,𝑢
𝐹𝑐,𝑢 = = 0.28
𝐾𝐴𝐵, 𝐶𝐷 +𝐾𝑐,𝑢 +𝐾𝑐,𝑙
𝐾𝑐,𝑙
𝐹𝑐,𝑙 = 𝐾𝐴𝐵, 𝐶𝐷 +𝐾𝑐,𝑢 +𝐾𝑐,𝑙
= 0.25

𝐾𝐴𝐵, 𝐵𝐶
Joint B & Joint C: 𝐹𝐵𝐴, 𝐶𝐵 = = 0.32
𝐾𝐴𝐵, 𝐵𝐶 +𝐾𝐵𝐶, 𝐶𝐷 +𝐾𝑐,𝑢 +𝐾𝑐,𝑙
𝐾𝐵𝐶, 𝐶𝐷
𝐹𝐵𝐶, 𝐶𝐷 = = 0.32
𝐾𝐴𝐵, 𝐵𝐶 +𝐾𝐵𝐶, 𝐶𝐷 +𝐾𝑐,𝑢 +𝐾𝑐,𝑙
𝐾𝑐,𝑢
𝐹𝑐,𝑢 = = 0.19
𝐾𝐴𝐵, 𝐵𝐶 +𝐾𝐵𝐶, 𝐶𝐷 +𝐾𝑐,𝑢 +𝐾𝑐,𝑙
𝐾𝑐,𝑙
𝐹𝑐,𝑙 = = 0.17
𝐾𝐴𝐵, 𝐵𝐶 +𝐾𝐵𝐶, 𝐶𝐷 +𝐾𝑐,𝑢 +𝐾𝑐,𝑙
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
CASE 1: Span 1 & 2 = wmax, Span 3 = wmin

3.5 m
wmax = 57.5 kN/m
wmax = 54.4 kN/m
wmin = 30.7 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

4m

6m 6m 6m

A B C D
Fixed End Moment
𝑤𝐿2 57.5 × 62
𝑀𝐴𝐵 = 𝑀𝐵𝐴 = = = 172.6 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
𝑤𝐿2 54.4 × 62
𝑀𝐵𝐶 = = = 163.3 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
𝑤𝐿2 30.7 × 62
𝑀𝐶𝐷 = = = 92.0 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Moment Distribution Method
51.00 -8.46 -8.71 -24.07
0.18 -0.27 0.29 -0.09
1.31 -0.78 0.38 -1.04
0.42 -5.51 4.45 3.23
49.09 -1.81 -13.82 -26.16
0.28 A B 0.19 C 0.19 D 0.28
0.25 0.47 0.32 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.17 0.32 0.47 0.25
-172.6 172.6 -163.3 163.3 -92.0 92.0
43.0 80.5 -3.0 -1.6 -3.0 -22.7 -12.1 -22.7 -42.9 -22.9
-1.5 40.3 -11.3 -1.5 -21.5 -11.3
0.4 0.7 -9.2 -4.9 -9.2 7.3 3.9 7.3 5.3 2.8
-4.6 0.3 3.7 -4.6 2.6 3.7
1.1 2.1 -1.3 -0.7 -1.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 -1.7 -0.9
-0.6 1.1 0.3 -0.6 -0.9 0.3
0.2 0.3 -0.4 -0.2 -0.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 -0.1 -0.1
44.6 -95.6 200.4 -7.4 -184.5 142.3 -7.6 -125.9 45.1 -21.1
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Moment in the COLUMN at each joint

51.00 -8.46 -8.71 -24.07


0.18 -0.27 0.29 -0.09
1.31 -0.78 0.38 -1.04
0.42 -5.51 4.45 3.23
49.09 -1.81 -13.82 -26.16
0.28 A B 0.19 C 0.19 D 0.28
0.25 0.47 0.32 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.17 0.32 0.47 0.25
-172.6 172.6 -163.3 163.3 -92.0 92.0
43.0 80.5 -3.0 -1.6 -3.0 -22.7 -12.1 -22.7 -42.9 -22.9
-1.5 40.3 -11.3 -1.5 -21.5 -11.3
0.4 0.7 -9.2 -4.9 -9.2 7.3 3.9 7.3 5.3 2.8
-4.6 0.3 3.7 -4.6 2.6 3.7
1.1 2.1 -1.3 -0.7 -1.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 -1.7 -0.9
-0.6 1.1 0.3 -0.6 -0.9 0.3
0.2 0.3 -0.4 -0.2 -0.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 -0.1 -0.1
44.6 -95.6 200.4 -7.4 -184.5 142.3 -7.6 -125.9 45.1 -21.1
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Moment in the BEAM at each joint

51.00 -8.46 -8.71 -24.07


0.18 -0.27 0.29 -0.09
1.31 -0.78 0.38 -1.04
0.42 -0.56 4.45 3.23
49.09 -1.81 -13.82 -26.16
0.28 A B 0.19 C 0.19 D 0.28
0.25 0.47 0.32 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.17 0.32 0.47 0.25
-172.6 172.6 -163.3 163.3 -92.0 92.0
43.0 80.5 -3.0 -1.6 -3.0 -22.7 -12.1 -22.7 -42.9 -22.9
-1.5 40.3 -11.3 -1.5 -21.5 -11.3
0.4 0.7 -9.2 -4.9 -9.2 7.3 3.9 7.3 5.3 2.8
-4.6 0.3 3.7 -4.6 2.6 3.7
1.1 2.1 -1.3 -0.7 -1.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 -1.7 -0.9
-0.6 1.1 0.3 -0.6 -0.9 0.3
0.2 0.3 -0.4 -0.2 -0.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 -0.1 -0.1
44.6 -95.6 200.4 -7.4 -184.5 142.3 -7.6 -125.9 45.1 -21.1
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Reaction Calculation at Support

wmax = 57.5 kN/m wmax = 54.4 kN/m


125.9 wmin = 30.7 kN/m 45.1
95.6 200.4 184.5 142.3

6m 6m 6m

VBA VCB VCD VDC


VAB VBC

Solve for each span using equilibrium method of analysis:

VAB = 155.1 kN
VBA = 190.0 kN

VBC = 170.3 kN
VCB = 156.2 kN

VCD = 105.5 kN
VDC = 78.5 kN
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagram
170.3
155.1 105.5

SFD (kN)
2.7 m 3.1 m 3.4 m
78.5
156.2
190.0

25.5 4.3 4.4 12.1


200.4
184.5
142.3 125.9
95.6 45.1
51.0 24.1
BMD (kNm) 44.6 8.5 7.4 8.7 7.6
21.1

55.4
82.0
113.5

22.3 3.7 3.8 10.6


Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Do the same for Load CASE 2, CASE 3 & CASE 4
SELF STUDY !!!
CASE 2: Span 2 & 3 = wmax, Span 1 = wmin

3.5 m
wmax = 57.5 kN/m
wmax = 54.4 kN/m
wmin = 30.7 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

4m

6m 6m 6m

A B C D
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Do the same for Load CASE 2, CASE 3 & CASE 4
SELF STUDY !!!
CASE 3: Span 1 & 3 = wmax, Span 2 = wmin

3.5 m
wmax = 57.5 kN/m wmax = 57.5 kN/m
wmin = 29.1 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

4m

6m 6m 6m

A B C D
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Do the same for Load CASE 2, CASE 3 & CASE 4
SELF STUDY !!!
CASE 4: Span 1 & 3 = wmin, Span 2 = wmax

3.5 m wmax = 54.4 kN/m


wmin = 30.7 kN/m wmin = 30.7 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

4m

6m 6m 6m

A B C D
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Shear Force and Bending Moment Envelope
190.0, 190.0
161.9, 161.9 170.3, 170.3
156.2 183.2
155.1
87.3 105.5
78.5

SFD (kN) 87.3 78.5


105.5 156.2
183.2 170.3, 170.3
190.0, 190.0 155.1
Case 1 161.9, 161.9

Case 2
200.4
Case 3 184.5 184.5
200.4
168.8 104.5
Case 4 104.5 168.8
130.9
142.3
153.4
153.4
142.3 130.9 95.6
95.6 125.9
125.9 112.6 112.6
45.1 45.1
43.8
BMD (kNm) 54.1 54.1 43.8
18.4
55.4 55.4
82.0, 82.0
113.5 91.5 113.5
123.0
123.0
Example 2: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame
Shear Force and Bending Moment Envelope
190.0, 190.0
161.9, 161.9 170.3, 170.3
156.2 183.2
155.1
87.3 105.5
78.5

SFD (kN) 87.3 78.5


105.5 156.2
183.2 170.3, 170.3
190.0, 190.0 155.1
Case 1 161.9, 161.9

Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
55.9 55.9
BMD (kNm) 48.9 30.0 26.2 30.0 26.2 48.9
Example 3
ANALYSIS OF TWO FREE-
JOINT SUB-FRAME
Example 3

2@4 m = 8 m
6m 6m 6m
1m Level 7

Level 6

6@3.5 m = 21 m
Level 5

Level 4

7@5 m = 35 m
Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

4m
2@4 m = 8 m

6m 6m 6m
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
CASE 1: Span 1 & 2 = wmax

3.5 m
wmax = 57.5 kN/m
wmax = 54.4 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2

C
4m

6m 6m

A B Stiffness, K = I/L
4.5×109
Beam: 𝐾𝐴𝐵 = = 7.5 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
6000
Span AB

4.5×109
𝐾𝐵𝐶 = 𝟎. 𝟓 × 6000
= 3.75 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
1.6×109
Column: 𝐾𝑐,𝑢 = 3500 = 4.6 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
1.6×109
𝐾𝑐,𝑙 = 4000 = 4.0 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
Fixed End Moment Moment Distribution Method
𝑤𝐿2 57.5 × 62 51.0 -11.9
𝑀𝐴𝐵 = = = 172.6 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12 0.0 -0.4
𝑤𝐿2 54.4 × 62 2.2 -0.1
𝑀𝐵𝐶 = = = 163.3 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12 0.5 -9.3
48.3 -2.1
Distribution Factor, F = K/K 0.28 A B 0.23
0.25 0.47 0.38 0.20 0.19
7.5
Joint A: 𝐹𝐴𝐵 = = 0.47 -172.6 172.6 -163.3
7.5+4.6+4.0
4.6
𝐹𝑐,𝑢 = = 0.28 43.1 81.1 -3.5 -1.9 -1.8
7.5+4.6+4.0
4.0 -1.8 40.6 0.0
𝐹𝑐,𝑙 = = 0.25
7.5+4.6+4.0 0.4 0.8 -15.4 -8.1 -7.7

7.5 -7.7 0.4 0.0


Joint B: 𝐹𝐵𝐴 = = 0.38 1.9 3.6 -0.2 -0.1 -0.1
7.5+3.75+4.6+4.0
Span AB

3.75
𝐹𝐵𝐶 = = 0.19 -0.1 1.8 0.0
7.5+3.75+4.6+4.0
4.6 0.0 0.0 -0.7 -0.4 -0.3
𝐹𝑐,𝑢 = = 0.23
7.5+3.75+4.6+4.0 45.4 -96.7 195.6 -10.5 -173.2
4.0
𝐹𝑐,𝑙 = = 0.20
7.5+3.75+4.6+4.0
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
CASE 2: Span 1 = wmax , Span 2 = wmin
Moment Distribution Method
55.2 -30.2
3.5 m
wmax = 57.5 kN/m
0.2 -0.4
wmin = 29.11 kN/m
2.2 -0.9

Span 1 Span 2 4.5 -9.3

C 48.3 -19.6
4m 0.28 A B 0.23
6m 6m 0.25 0.47 0.38 0.20 0.19
-172.6 172.6 -87.3
43.1 81.1 -32.4 -17.1 -16.2
A B -16.2 40.5 0.0
4.0 7.6 -15.4 -8.1 -7.7
Span AB

-7.7 3.8 0.0


1.9 3.6 -1.4 -0.8 -0.7
-0.7 1.8 0.0
0.2 0.3 -0.7 -0.4 -0.3
49.2 -105.1 168.8 -26.4 -112.2
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
Reaction Calculation at Support
CASE 1 CASE 2
wmax = 57.5 kN/m wmax = 57.5 kN/m
96.7 195.6 105.1 168.8

6m 6m

VAB VBA VAB VBA

Solve for each span using Solve for each span using
equilibrium method of analysis: equilibrium method of analysis:

VAB = 156.2 kN VAB = 162.0 kN


VBA = 189.0 kN VBA = 183.2 kN
Span AB
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagram

162.0
156.2

SFD (kN)
183.2
189.0

105.1 195.4
97.1 168.8
49.0 56.0
BMD (kNm) 26.4
30.2

114.9
Span AB

122.9
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
CASE 1: Span 1 & 2 = wmax, Span 3 = wmin

3.5 m
wmax = 57.5 kN/m
wmax = 54.4 kN/m
wmin = 30.7 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

A D
4m

6m 6m 6m

B C
Span BC
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame

Fixed End Moment Distribution Factor, F = K/K


𝑤𝐿2 57.5 × 62
𝑀𝐴𝐵 = 𝑀𝐵𝐴 = = = 172.6 𝑘𝑁𝑚 3.75
12 12 Joint B: 𝐹𝐵𝐴 = = 0.19
3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
𝑤𝐿2 54.4 × 62 7.5
𝑀𝐵𝐶 = 𝑀𝐶𝐵 = = = 163.3 𝑘𝑁𝑚 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = = 0.38
12 12 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
𝑤𝐿2 30.7 × 62 𝐹𝑐,𝑢 =
4.6
= 0.23
𝑀𝐶𝐷 = 𝑀𝐷𝐶 = = = 92.0 𝑘𝑁𝑚 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
12 12 4.0
𝐹𝑐,𝑙 = = 0.20
3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0

Stiffness, K = I/L 7.5


4.5×109 Joint C: 𝐹𝐶𝐵 = = 0.38
Beam: 𝐾𝐴𝐵 = 𝐾𝐶𝐷 = 𝟎. 𝟓 × = 3.75 × 105 𝑚𝑚3 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
3.75
6000
4.5×109 𝐹𝐶𝐷 = = 0.19
𝐾𝐵𝐶 = = 7.5 × 10 𝑚𝑚3
5 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
4.6
6000
1.6×109 𝐹𝑐,𝑢 = = 0.23
Column: 𝐾𝑐,𝑢 = = 4.6 × 105 𝑚𝑚3 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
4.0
3500
1.6×109 𝐹𝑐,𝑙 = = 0.20
3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
𝐾𝑐,𝑙 = = 4.0 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
Span BC

4000
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
Moment Distribution Method
1.00 -16.61
0.11 0.01
-0.08 -0.59
3.11 0.41
-2.15 -16.44
B 0.23 C 0.23
0.19 0.20 0.38 0.38 0.20 0.19
172.6 -163.3 163.3 -92.0
-1.8 -1.9 -3.5 -27.0 -14.4 -13.5
0.0 -13.5 -1.8 0.0
2.6 2.7 5.1 0.7 0.4 0.3
0.0 0.3 2.6 0.0
Span BC

-0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5


0.0 -0.5 -0.1 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
173.4 0.9 -175.3 136.7 -14.5 -105.6
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
CASE 2: Span 2 = wmax, Span 1 & 3 = wmin

3.5 m wmax = 54.4 kN/m


wmax = 30.7 kN/m wmin = 30.7 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

A D
4m

6m 6m 6m

B C
Span BC
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame

Fixed End Moment Distribution Factor, F = K/K


𝑤𝐿2 30.7 × 62
𝑀𝐴𝐵 = 𝑀𝐵𝐴 = = = 92.0 𝑘𝑁𝑚 3.75
12 12 Joint B: 𝐹𝐵𝐴 = = 0.19
3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
𝑤𝐿2 54.4 × 62 7.5
𝑀𝐵𝐶 = 𝑀𝐶𝐵 = = = 163.3 𝑘𝑁𝑚 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = = 0.38
12 12 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
𝑤𝐿2 30.7 × 62 𝐹𝑐,𝑢 =
4.6
= 0.23
𝑀𝐶𝐷 = 𝑀𝐷𝐶 = = = 92.0 𝑘𝑁𝑚 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
12 12 4.0
𝐹𝑐,𝑙 = = 0.20
3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0

Stiffness, K = I/L 7.5


4.5×109 Joint C: 𝐹𝐶𝐵 = = 0.38
Beam: 𝐾𝐴𝐵 = 𝐾𝐶𝐷 = 𝟎. 𝟓 × = 3.75 × 105 𝑚𝑚3 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
3.75
6000
4.5×109 𝐹𝐶𝐷 = = 0.19
𝐾𝐵𝐶 = = 7.5 × 10 𝑚𝑚3
5 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
4.6
6000
1.6×109 𝐹𝑐,𝑢 = = 0.23
Column: 𝐾𝑐,𝑢 = = 4.6 × 105 𝑚𝑚3 3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
4.0
3500
1.6×109 𝐹𝑐,𝑙 = = 0.20
3.75+7.5+4.6+4.0
𝐾𝑐,𝑙 = = 4.0 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
Span BC

4000
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
Moment Distribution Method
20.25 -20.25
0.11 0.11
0.59 -0.59
3.11 -3.11
16.44 -16.44
B 0.23 C 0.23
0.19 0.20 0.38 0.38 0.20 0.19
92.0 -163.3 163.3 -92.0
13.5 14.4 27.0 -27.0 -14.4 -13.5
0.0 -13.5 13.5 0.0
2.6 2.7 5.1 -5.1 -2.7 -2.6
0.0 -2.6 2.6 0.0
Span BC

0.5 0.5 1.0 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5


0.0 -0.5 0.5 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.2 -0.2 -0.1 -0.1
108.6 17.7 -146.6 146.6 -14.5 -108.6
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
Reaction Calculation at Support
CASE 1 CASE 2
wmax = 54.4 kN/m wmax = 54.4 kN/m
175.3 136.7 146.6 146.6

6m 6m

VBC VCB VBC VCB

Solve for each span using Solve for each span using
equilibrium method of analysis: equilibrium method of analysis:

VBC = 169.7 kN VCB = 163.3 kN


VCB = 156.8 kN VCB = 163.3 kN
Span BC
Example 3: Analysis of Two Free-Joint Sub-
Frame
Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagram

169.7
163.3

SFD (kN)
156.8
163.3

175.3 195.4
146.6 146.6
20.2 20.2
17.7
BMD (kNm) 17.7
89.3

98.3
Span BC
Example 4
CONTINUOUS BEAM + ONE
FREE-JOINT SUB-FRAME
Example 4

2@4 m = 8 m
6m 6m 6m
1m Level 7

Level 6

6@3.5 m = 21 m
Level 5

Level 4

7@5 m = 35 m
Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

4m
2@4 m = 8 m

6m 6m 6m
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame

Load
Set 1 6m 6m 6m

A B C D

Moment of Inertia Distribution Factor, F = K/K


𝑏ℎ3 250 × 6003
𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 = = = 4.5 × 109 𝑚𝑚4 Joint A: 𝐹𝐵𝐴 =
5.63
= 1.00
12 12 5.63+0

Stiffness, K = I/L Joint B: 𝐹𝐵𝐴 =


5.63
5.63+7.5
= 0.43
9
𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 4.5 × 10 7.5
𝐾𝐴𝐵 = 𝐾𝐶𝐷 = 0.75 × = 0.75 × 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = = 0.57
𝐿 6000 5.63+7.5
= 5.63 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
7.5
𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 4.5 × 109 Joint C: 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = = 0.57
𝐾𝐵𝐶 = = = 7.5 × 105 𝑚𝑚3 5.63+7.5
𝐿 6000 𝐹𝐶𝐷 =
5.63
= 0.43
7.5+5.63

5.63
Joint D: 𝐹𝐷𝐶 = = 1.00
5.63+0
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
CASE 1: Span 1 & 2 = wmax, Span 3 = wmin
wmax = 57.5 kN/m
wmax = 54.4 kN/m
wmin = 30.7 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

6m 6m 6m

A B C D

Fixed End Moment, FEM


𝑤𝐿2 57.5 × 62
𝑀𝐴𝐵 = 𝑀𝐵𝐴 = = = 172.6 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
𝑤𝐿2 54.4 × 62
𝑀𝐵𝐶 = 𝑀𝐶𝐵 = = = 163.3 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
𝑤𝐿2 30.7 × 62
𝑀𝐶𝐷 = 𝑀𝐷𝐶 = = = 92.0 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Moment Distribution Method

A B C D
0.00 1.00 0.43 0.57 0.57 0.43 1.00 0.00
-172.6 172.6 -163.3 163.3 -92.0 92.0
172.6 -4.0 -5.3 -40.7 -30.5 -92.0
86.3 -20.4 -2.7 -46.0
-28.3 -37.7 27.8 20.9
13.9 -18.8
-6.0 -7.9 10.8 8.1
5.4 -4.0
-2.3 -3.1 2.3 1.7
1.1 -1.5
-0.5 -0.6 0.9 0.7
0.00 217.9 -217.9 137.2 -137.2 0.00
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Reaction Calculation at Support

wmax = 57.5 kN/m wmax = 54.4 kN/m


137.2 wmin = 30.7 kN/m
217.9 217.9 137.2

6m 6m 6m

VBA VCB VCD VDC


VAB VBC

Solve for each span using equilibrium method of analysis:

VAB = 136.3 kN
VBA = 208.9 kN

VBC = 176.7 kN
VCB = 149.8 kN

VCD = 114.9 kN
VDC = 69.1 kN
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Do the same for Load CASE 2, CASE 3 & CASE 4
SELF STUDY !!!
CASE 2: Span 2 & 3 = wmax, Span 1 = wmin
wmax = 57.5 kN/m
wmax = 54.4 kN/m
wmin = 30.7 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

6m 6m 6m

A B C D
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Do the same for Load CASE 2, CASE 3 & CASE 4
SELF STUDY !!!
CASE 3: Span 1 & 3 = wmax, Span 2 = wmin
wmax = 57.5 kN/m wmax = 57.5 kN/m
wmin = 29.1 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

6m 6m 6m

A B C D
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Do the same for Load CASE 2, CASE 3 & CASE 4
SELF STUDY !!!
CASE 4: Span 2 = wmax, Span 1 & 3 = wmin
wmax = 54.4 kN/m
wmin = 30.7 kN/m wmin = 30.7 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

6m 6m 6m

A B C D

FINALLY DO THE SFD & BMD ENVELOPE !!!


Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Sub-Frame: Bending Moment in Column

Column A
Fixed End Moment, FEM
𝑤𝐿2 57.5 × 62
𝑀𝐴𝐵 = = = 172.6 𝑘𝑁𝑚
wmax = 57.5 kN/m
12 12
3.5 m Kc,u
Moment of Inertia, I = bh3/12

0.5KAB 250×6003
Beam: = 4.5 × 109 𝑚𝑚4
12
4m Kc,l 300×4003
Column: = 1.6 × 109 𝑚𝑚4
6m 12

Stiffness, K = I/L

4.5×109
Beam: 𝐾𝐴𝐵 = 𝐾𝐵𝐶 = 𝐾𝐶𝐷 = = 7.5 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
6000
1.6×109 5
Column: 𝐾𝑐,𝑢 = = 4.6 × 10 𝑚𝑚3
3500
1.6×109
𝐾𝑐,𝑙 = = 4.0 × 105 𝑚𝑚3
4000
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Sub-Frame: Bending Moment in Column
Moment in upper column, Mupper
𝐾 4.6
𝑀𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = 𝐹𝐸𝑀 × 𝐾 +𝐾 𝑐,𝑢 +0.5𝐾
= 172.6 × 4.6+4.0+0.5×7.5
= 𝟔𝟒. 𝟑 kNm
𝑐,𝑢 𝑐,𝑙 𝐴𝐵

Moment in lower column, Mlower


𝐾 4.0
𝑀𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = 𝐹𝐸𝑀 × 𝐾 +𝐾 𝑐,𝑙 = 172.6 × = 𝟓𝟔. 𝟎 kNm
𝑐,𝑢 +0.5𝐾
𝑐,𝑙 𝐴𝐵 4.6+4.0+0.5×7.5

56.0 64.3
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Sub-Frame: Bending Moment in Column

Column B
Fixed End Moment, FEM
3.5 m
wmax = 57.5 kN/m Kc,u 𝑤𝐿2 57.5 × 62
wmin = 29.1 kN/m
𝑀𝐵𝐴 = = = 172.6 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
𝑤𝐿2 29.1 × 62
𝑀𝐵𝐶 = = = 87.3 𝑘𝑁𝑚
0.5KAB 0.5KBC 12 12

4m Kc,l  ∆𝐹𝐸𝑀 = 𝑀𝐴𝐵 − 𝑀𝐵𝐶 = 𝟖𝟓. 𝟑 𝒌𝑵𝒎


6m 6m
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Sub-Frame: Bending Moment in Column
Moment in upper column, Mupper
𝐾𝑐,𝑢 4.6
𝑀𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = ∆𝐹𝐸𝑀 × 𝐾 +𝐾 +0.5𝐾 = 85.3 × = 𝟐𝟒. 𝟐 kNm
𝑐,𝑢 𝑐,𝑙 𝐴𝐵 +0.5𝐾𝐵𝐶 4.6+4.0+0.5×7.5+0.5×7.5

Moment in lower column, Mlower


𝐾𝑐,𝑙 4.0
𝑀𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = ∆𝐹𝐸𝑀 × 𝐾 +𝐾 +0.5𝐾 = 85.3 × = 𝟐𝟏. 𝟐 kNm
𝑐,𝑢 𝑐,𝑙 𝐴𝐵 +0.5𝐾𝐵𝐶 4.6+4.0+0.5×7.5+0.5×7.5

24.2 21.2
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Sub-Frame: Bending Moment in Column

Column C
Fixed End Moment, FEM
3.5 m
Kc,u
wmax = 57.5 kN/m 𝑤𝐿2 29.1 × 62
𝑀𝐵𝐶 = = = 87.3 𝑘𝑁𝑚
wmin = 29.1 kN/m 12 12
𝑤𝐿2 57.5 × 62
𝑀𝐶𝐷 = = = 172.6 𝑘𝑁𝑚
0.5KBC 0.5KCD 12 12

4m Kc,l  ∆𝐹𝐸𝑀 = 𝑀𝐶𝐷 − 𝑀𝐵𝐶 = 𝟖𝟓. 𝟑 𝒌𝑵𝒎


6m 6m
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Sub-Frame: Bending Moment in Column
Moment in upper column, Mupper
𝐾𝑐,𝑢 4.6
𝑀𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = ∆𝐹𝐸𝑀 × 𝐾 +𝐾 +0.5𝐾 = 85.3 × = 𝟐𝟒. 𝟐 kNm
𝑐,𝑢 𝑐,𝑙 𝐵𝐶 +0.5𝐾𝐶𝐷 4.6+4.0+0.5×7.5+0.5×7.5

Moment in lower column, Mlower


𝐾𝑐,𝑙 4.0
𝑀𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = ∆𝐹𝐸𝑀 × 𝐾 +𝐾 +0.5𝐾 = 85.3 × = 𝟐𝟏. 𝟐 kNm
𝑐,𝑢 𝑐,𝑙 𝐵𝐶 +0.5𝐾𝐶𝐷 4.6+4.0+0.5×7.5+0.5×7.5

21.2 24.2
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Sub-Frame: Bending Moment in Column

Column D
Fixed End Moment, FEM
𝑤𝐿2 57.5 × 62
𝑀𝐷𝐶 = = = 172.6 𝑘𝑁𝑚
wmax = 57.5 kN/m
12 12
Kc,u 3.5 m

0.5KCD

Kc,l 4m
6m
Example 4: Continuous Beam + One Free-
Joint Sub-Frame
Sub-Frame: Bending Moment in Column
Moment in upper column, Mupper
𝐾 4.6
𝑀𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = 𝐹𝐸𝑀 × 𝐾 +𝐾 𝑐,𝑢 +0.5𝐾
= 172.6 × 4.6+4.0+0.5×7.5
= 𝟔𝟒. 𝟑 kNm
𝑐,𝑢 𝑐,𝑙 𝐶𝐷

Moment in lower column, Mlower


𝐾 4.0
𝑀𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = 𝐹𝐸𝑀 × 𝐾 +𝐾 𝑐,𝑙+0.5𝐾 = 172.6 × = 𝟓𝟔. 𝟎 kNm
𝑐,𝑢 𝑐,𝑙 𝐶𝐷 4.6+4.0+0.5×7.5

64.3 56.0
Wind Action

• Intensity of wind action on a structure related to:


a) Square of wind velocity
b) Member dimensions that resist the wind

• Wind velocity dependent on:


a) Geographical location
b) Height of structure
c) Topography area
d) Roughness of the surrounding terrain

• Response of the structure from the variable wind action:


a) Background component
b) Resonant component
Wind Action

• Static deflection of the


structure under wind pressure
Background
Component

• Dynamic vibration of the


structure under wind pressure
Resonant • Relatively small
Component • Normally treated using static
method of analysis
Wind Action
Plan View
Side View

(−)
Separation Zone (−)
Wind Separation point   15

Windward (+) (−)


Wake
Stagnation point Leeward

Effect of Wind on Buildings


Wind Action

Calculation of Wind Pressure


(MS 1553: 2002)
Simplified Analytical Wind Tunnel
Method Procedure Procedure
 Building of  Rectangular  Complex buildings
rectangular in plan buildings
 Height  15 m  Height  200 m
 Roof span  100
mm
Wind Action: Simplified Method

Appendix A, MS 1553: 2002

1. Determined basic wind speed, Vs (Figure A1, MS 1553: 2002)


2. Determine the terrain/height multiplier, Mz,cat (Table A1, MS
1553: 2002)
3. Determine external pressure coefficient, Cp,e for surface of enclose
building (A2.3 and A2.4, MS 1553: 2002)
4. Determine internal pressure coefficient, Cp,i for surface of enclose
building. Taken as +0.6 or −0.3 and shall be considered to
determine the critical load requirements.
5. Design wind pressure, p (in Pa):

𝟐 𝟐
𝒑 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟏𝟑 𝑽𝒔 𝑴𝒛,𝒄𝒂𝒕 𝑪𝒑,𝒆 − 𝑪𝒑,𝒊
Wind Action: Simplified Method

Figure A1, MS 1553: 2002


Wind Action: Simplified Method
Wind Action: Simplified Method
Wind Action: Simplified Method
Wind Action: Analytical Procedure

Section 2, MS 1553: 2002

Design wind pressure (in Pa):

𝒑 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟏𝟑 𝑽𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝟐 𝑪𝒇𝒊𝒈 𝑪𝒅𝒚𝒏

𝑪𝒅𝒚𝒏 = 𝟏. 𝟎 𝒊𝒇
𝑽𝒅𝒆𝒔 = 𝑽𝒔𝒊𝒕 𝒍 > 𝟏 𝑯𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒛 (𝒖𝒏𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒄𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆)

𝑪𝒇𝒊𝒈 = 𝑪𝒑,𝒆 𝑲𝒂 𝑲𝒄 𝑲𝒍 𝑲𝒑

𝑽𝒔𝒊𝒕 = 𝑽𝒔 𝑴𝒅 𝑴𝒛,𝒄𝒂𝒕 𝑴𝒔 𝑴𝒉 If others,


see Next
Wind Action: Analytical Procedure

Vdes = Design wind speed


l = Importance factor (Table 3.2, MS 1553: 2002)
Vs = Basic wind speed (33.5 m/s: Zone 1 & 32.5 m/s: Zone 2)
Md = Wind directional multiplier = 1.0
Mz, cat = Terrain/Height multiplier (Table 4.1, MS 1553: 2002)
Ms = Shielding multiplier (Table 4.3, MS 1553: 2002) = 1.0 if effects of
shielding is ignored or not applicable
Mh = Hill shape multiplier = 1.0 except for particular cardinal direction in the
local topographic zones

Cfig = Aerodynamic shape factor


Cp,e = External pressure coefficient (Table 5.2(a) & 5.2(b), MS 1553: 2002)
Cdyn = Dynamic response factor
Ka = Area reduction factor = 1.0 (in most cases)
Kc = Combination factor = 1.0 (in most cases)
Kl = Local pressure factor = 1.0 (in most cases)
Kp = Porous cladding reduction factor = 1.0 (in most cases)
Wind Action: Analytical Procedure

Section 2, MS 1553: 2002

𝟏 𝟏
𝑩𝒔 = 𝑺=
𝟑. 𝟓𝒏𝒂 𝒉 𝟏 + 𝒈𝒗 𝒍𝒉 𝟒𝒏𝒂 𝒃𝟎𝒉 𝟏 + 𝒈𝒗 𝒍𝒉
𝟑𝟔 𝒉 − 𝒔 𝟐 + 𝟔𝟒𝒃𝒔𝒉 𝟐 𝟏+ 𝟏+
𝟏+ 𝑽𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝑽𝒅𝒆𝒔
𝑳𝒉

𝟎. 𝟒𝟕𝑵
𝒈𝑹 𝟐 𝑺𝑬𝒕 𝑬𝒕 =
𝟐 + 𝑵 𝟓/𝟔
𝟏 + 𝟐𝒍𝒉 𝒈𝒗 𝟐 𝑩𝒔 +
𝜻
𝑪𝒅𝒚𝒏 =
𝟏 + 𝟐𝒈𝒗 𝒍𝒉
𝒏𝒂 𝑳𝒉 𝟏 + 𝒈𝒗 𝒍𝒉
𝑵=
𝑽𝒅𝒆𝒔
Wind Action: Analytical Procedure
Wind Action: Analytical Procedure
Wind Action: Analytical Procedure
Wind Action: Analytical Procedure
Wind Action: Analytical Procedure
Example 5
WIND LOAD CALCULATION
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation

Wind
b = 18 m

b = 18 m
Wind
h = 25 m

d = 51 m

Plan View
Side Elevation

Location: Kuala Lumpur (Zone 1)


Terrain: Suburban Terrain for All Directions
Topography: Ground Slope Les than 1 in 20 for Greater than 5 km in All
Directions
Construction: Reinforced Concrete
Sway Frequencies, na = nc: 0.2 Hertz
Mode Shape: Linear, k: 1.0
Average Building Density: 160 kg/m3
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation

Using Analytical Procedure in Section 2, MS 1553: 2002

Design wind pressure, 𝒑 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟏𝟑 𝑽𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝟐 𝑪𝒇𝒊𝒈 𝑪𝒅𝒚𝒏

(1) Design wind speed, 𝑽𝒅𝒆𝒔 = 𝑽𝒔𝒊𝒕 𝒍 = 𝟑𝟐. 𝟓 × 𝟏. 𝟏𝟓 = 𝟑𝟕. 𝟑𝟕 𝒎/𝒔

where 𝑉𝑠𝑖𝑡 = 𝑉𝑠 𝑀𝑑 𝑀𝑧,𝑐𝑎𝑡 𝑀𝑠 𝑀ℎ = 33.5 × 1.00 × 0.97 × 1.00 × 1.00 = 32.5 𝑚/𝑠

Vs = Basic wind speed (Figure A.1) = 33.5 m/s


Md = Wind directional multiplier = 1.00
Mz,cat = Terrain/Height multiplier (Table 4.1) = 0.97 by interpolation
Ms = Shielding multiplier = 1.00
Mh = Hill shape multiplier = 1.00

l = Importance factor (Table 3.2) = 1.15


Example 5: Wind Load Calculation

25 m
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation

(2) Aerodynamic shape factor, 𝑪𝒇𝒊𝒈 = 𝑪𝒑,𝒆 𝑲𝒂 𝑲𝒄 𝑲𝒍 𝑲𝒑

 𝑪𝒇𝒊𝒈 𝑾 = 𝑪𝒑,𝒆 𝑲𝒂 𝑲𝒄 𝑲𝒍 𝑲𝒑 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟎
 𝑪𝒇𝒊𝒈 𝑳 = 𝑪𝒑,𝒆 𝑲𝒂 𝑲𝒄 𝑲𝒍 𝑲𝒑 = −𝟎. 𝟐𝟓

where Cp,e = External pressure coefficient


Windward wall = 0.80 (for varying z)
Leeward wall = -0.25 by interpolation (for d/b = 51 m/18 m = 2.8)

Ka = Area reduction factor = 1.00


Kc = Combination factor = 1.00
Kl = Local pressure factor = 1.00
Kp = Porous cladding reduction factor = 1.00
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation

2.8
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation
𝒈 𝟐 𝑺𝑬
𝟏+𝟐𝒍𝒉 𝒈𝒗 𝟐 𝑩𝒔 + 𝑹 𝝃 𝒕
(3) Dynamic response factor,𝑪𝒅𝒚𝒏 = = 𝟏. 𝟑𝟐𝟕
𝟏+𝟐𝒈𝒗 𝒍𝒉

where lh = Turbulence intensity at z = h (Table 6.1) = 0.205 by interpolation


gv = Peak factor = 3.7 given h = 25 m
1 s=0m
Bs = Background factor = 2
= 0.7431 0.25
36 ℎ−𝑠 2 +64𝑏𝑠ℎ ℎ
1+ 𝐿ℎ = 1000 = 1257 𝑚
𝐿ℎ 10
bsh = 51 m
1
S = Size reduction factor = 3.5𝑛𝑎 ℎ 1+𝑔𝑣 𝑙ℎ 4𝑛 𝑏 1+𝑔𝑣 𝑙ℎ
= 0.188
1+ 1+ 𝑎 0ℎ
𝑉𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑉𝑑𝑒𝑠
0.47𝑁 na = 0.2 Hz given
Et = Spectrum of turbulence = = 0.623
(2+𝑁)5/6 b0h = bsh = 51 m
𝑛𝑎 𝐿ℎ 1 + 𝑔𝑣 𝑙ℎ
𝑁= = 11.83
𝑉𝑑𝑒𝑠

 = Ratio of structural damping to critical damping (Table 6.2) = 0.05


gR = Peak factor for resonance response = 2 log 𝑒 600𝑛𝑎 = 3.09
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation

25 m
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation

𝒑 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟏𝟑 𝑽𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝟐 𝑪𝒇𝒊𝒈 𝑪𝒅𝒚𝒏 (N/m2)


Mz,cat (Table Total,
Level Height (m) Windward Leeward
4.1) ptotal
Vdes,z (m/s) pW Vdes,h(m/s) pL pW - pL
7 (Roof) 25.0 0.970 37.4 910 37.4 -284 1194
6 21.5 0.950 36.6 872 37.4 -284 1156
5 18.0 0.920 35.4 815 37.4 -284 1099
4 14.5 0.890 34.3 766 37.4 -284 1050
3 11.0 0.840 32.4 683 37.4 -284 967
2 7.5 0.790 30.4 601 37.4 -284 885
1 4.0 0.750 28.9 543 37.4 -284 827
Example 5: Wind Load Calculation

0.910 0.284 1.194 Level 7 (Roof)


0.872 0.284 1.156 Level 6

0.766 0.284 1.050 Level 4

0.601 0.284 0.885 Level 2


0.543 0.284 0.827 Level 1
Ground

pW (kN/m2) pL (kN/m2) Total (kN/m2)


Frame Analysis for Lateral Actions

Portal • Frame divided into independent portals


• Shear in each storey is assumed to be divided
between the bay in proportion to their spans
Method • Shear in each bay is divided equally between columns

• Axial loads in column are assumed to be proportional


Cantilever to the distance from the frame’s centre of gravity
• Assumed column in a storey has equal cross-sectional
Method area & point of contraflexure are located at midspan
for all column & beams
Frame Stability

Lateral load Vertical load

Pinned beam-to-column connections


Frame is not stable when subjected to lateral forces
Frame Stability – Unbraced

Rigid beam-to-
column connection

Unstable Frame

Pinned base Rigid base


Frame Stability – Braced

Pinned
connections

Rigid
core

Unstable Frame
Stable Frame
Example 6
LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS –
CANTILEVER METHOD
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
Design wind load for each floor level of sub-frame 3 = 1.2wk:

where wk = Total wind pressure, ptotal  Contact area

Roof: 1.2  1.194 kN/m2  4.50 m  1.75 m = 11.3 kN


Level 6: 1.2  1.156 kN/m2  4.50 m  3.50 m = 21.8 kN
Level 5: 1.2  1.099 kN/m2  4.50 m  3.50 m = 20.8 kN 4m 5m
Level 4: 1.2  1.050 kN/m2  4.50 m  3.50 m = 19.8 kN
Level 3: 1.2  0.967 kN/m2  4.50 m  3.50 m = 18.3 kN
Level 2: 1.2  0.885 kN/m2  4.50 m  3.50 m = 16.7 kN
Level 1: 1.2  0.827 kN/m2  4.50 m  3.75 m = 16.7 kN
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
11.3 kN Roof

3.5 m
K
21.8 kN Level 6

3.5 m
L
20.8 kN Level 5

3.5 m
M
19.8 kN Level 4

3.5 m
N
18.3 kN Level 3

3.5 m
P
16.7 kN Level 2

3.5 m
Q
16.7 kN Level 1

4m
R x=9m
A B C D

6m 6m 6m
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
11.3 kN Roof

3.5 m
K
21.8 kN Level 6

3.5 m
L
20.8 kN Level 5

3.5 m
M
19.8 kN Level 4

3.5 m
N
18.3 kN Level 3

3.5 m
P
Column A B C D
16.7 kN Level 2
Distance from Centroid 9.00 3.00 3.00 9.00

3.5 m
Q

Column
16.7 N
Axial Load 3.0P 1.0P 1.0P
Level 1
3.0P

4m
R
A B C D

6m 6m 6m
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)

LEVEL K AND ABOVE


Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
Level K and Above

11.3 kN
1.75 m
K H1 H2 H3 H4

6m 6m 6m
3.0P 1.0P 1.0P 3.0P

Axial Force in Columns

σ 𝑀 @𝐾 = 0
11.3 × 1.75 + 1.0𝑃 × 6 − 1.0𝑃 × 12 − 3.0𝑃 × 18 = 0  P = 0.33 kN
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
F1 F2 F3
11.3 kN
1.75 m
K H1 H2 H3 H4

6m 6m 6m
0.99 kN 0.33 kN 0.33 kN 0.99 kN

Shear Force in Beams & Columns

Consider sub-frame to the left of F1:


σ 𝐹𝑣 = 0: F1 – 0.99 = 0  F1 = 0.99 kN
σ 𝑀@𝐹1 = 0: 𝐻1 × 1.75 − 0.99 × 3 = 0  H1 = 1.70 kN

Consider sub-frame to the left of F2:


σ 𝐹𝑣 = 0: F2 – 0.99 – 0.33= 0  F2 = 1.32 kN
σ 𝑀@𝐹2 = 0: 𝐻1 + 𝐻2 × 1.75 − 0.99 × 9 − 0.33 × 3 = 0  H2 = 3.96 kN

Consider sub-frame to the left of F3:


σ 𝐹𝑣 = 0: F3 – 0.99 – 0.33 + 0.33= 0  F3 = 0.99 kN
σ 𝑀@𝐹3 = 0: 𝐻1 + 𝐻2 + 𝐻3 × 1.75 − 0.99 × 15 − 0.33 × 9 + 0.33 × 3 = 0
 H3 = 3.96 kN

σ 𝐹𝐻 = 0: 11.3 – H1 – H2 – H3 – H4 = 0  H4 = 1.68 kN
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)

LEVEL L AND ABOVE


Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
Level L and Above
11.3 kN

3.5 m
K
21.8 kN
1.75 m
L H1 H2 H3 H4

6m 6m 6m
3.0P 1.0P 1.0P 3.0P

Axial Force in Columns

σ 𝑀 @𝐿 = 0
11.3 × 5.25 + 21.8 × 1.75 + 1.0𝑃 × 6 − 1.0𝑃 × 12 − 3.0𝑃 × 18 = 0  P = 1.62 kN
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
0.99 kN 0.33 kN 0.33 kN 0.99 kN

1.70 3.96 3.96 1.68


K
F1 F2 F3 1.75 m
21.8 + 11.3 = 33.1 kN
1.75 m
L H1 H2 H3 H4
6m 6m 6m
4.86 kN 1.62 kN 1.62 kN 4.86 kN
Shear Force in Beams & Columns

Consider sub-frame to the left of F1:


σ 𝐹𝑣 = 0: F1 – 4.86 + 0.99 = 0  F1 = 3.87 kN
σ 𝑀@𝐹1 = 0: 𝐻1 + 1.70 × 1.75 − 4.86 − 0.99 × 3 = 0  H1 = 4.93 kN

Consider sub-frame to the left of F2:


σ 𝐹𝑣 = 0: F2 – 4.86 + 0.99 – 1.62 + 0.33 = 0  F2 = 5.16 kN
σ 𝑀@𝐹2 = 0:
𝐻1 + 𝐻2 × 1.75 + 1.70 + 3.96 × 1.75 − 4.86 − 0.99 × 9 − 1.62 − 0.33 × 3 = 0
 H2 = 11.52 kN
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
0.99 kN 0.33 kN 0.33 kN 0.99 kN

1.70 3.96 3.96 1.68


K
F1 F2 F3 1.75 m
21.8 + 11.3 = 33.1 kN
1.75 m
L H1 H2 H3 H4
6m 6m 6m
4.86 kN 1.62 kN 1.62 kN 4.86 kN
Shear Force in Beams & Columns

Consider sub-frame to the left of F3:


σ 𝐹𝑣 = 0: F3 – 4.86 + 0.99 – 1.62 + 0.33 + 1.62 – 0.33 = 0  F3 = 3.87 kN
σ 𝑀@𝐹3 = 0:
𝐻1 + 𝐻2 + 𝐻3 × 1.75 + 1.70 + 3.96 + 3.96 × 1.75 − 4.86 − 0.99 × 15 − 1.62 − 0.33 × 9
+ 1.62 − 0.33 × 3 = 0
 H3 = 11.52 kN

σ 𝐹𝐻 = 0: 33.1 – H1 – H2 – H3 – H4 = 0  H4 = 5.13 kN
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)

LEVEL M AND ABOVE


Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
Level M and Above
11.3 kN
K 3.5 m
21.8 kN
L 3.5 m
20.8 kN
1.75 m
M H1 H2 H3 H4

6m 6m 6m
3.0P 1.0P 1.0P 3.0P

Axial Force in Columns

σ 𝑀 @𝐿 = 0
11.3 × 8.75 + 21.8 × 5.25 + 20.8 × 1.75 + 1.0𝑃 × 6 − 1.0𝑃 × 12 − 3.0𝑃 × 18 = 0
 P = 4.16 kN
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
4.86 kN 1.62 kN 1.62 kN 4.86 kN

4.93 11.52 11.52 5.13


L
F1 F2 F3 1.75 m
21.8 + 11.3 + 20.8 = 53.9 kN
1.75 m
M H1 H2 H3 H4
6m 6m 6m
12.48 kN 4.16 kN 4.16 kN 12.48 kN
Shear Force in Beams & Columns

Consider sub-frame to the left of F1:


σ 𝐹𝑣 = 0: F1 – 12.48 + 4.86 = 0  F1 = 7.62 kN
σ 𝑀@𝐹1 = 0: 𝐻1 + 4.93 × 1.75 − 12.48 − 4.86 × 3 = 0  H1 = 8.13 kN

Consider sub-frame to the left of F2:


σ 𝐹𝑣 = 0: F2 – 12.48 + 4.86 – 4.16 + 1.62 = 0  F2 = 10.16 kN
σ 𝑀@𝐹2 = 0:
𝐻1 + 𝐻2 × 1.75 + 4.93 + 11.52 × 1.75 − 12.48 − 4.86 × 9 − 4.16 − 1.62 × 3 = 0
 H2 = 18.93 kN
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
4.86 kN 1.62 kN 1.62 kN 4.86 kN

4.93 11.52 11.52 5.13


L
F1 F2 F3 1.75 m
21.8 + 11.3 + 20.8 = 53.9 kN
1.75 m
M H1 H2 H3 H4
6m 6m 6m
12.48 kN 4.16 kN 4.16 kN 12.48 kN
Shear Force in Beams & Columns

Consider sub-frame to the left of F3:


σ 𝐹𝑣 = 0: F3 – 12.48 + 4.86 – 4.16 + 1.62 + 4.16 – 1.62 = 0  F3 = 7.62 kN
σ 𝑀@𝐹3 = 0:
𝐻1 + 𝐻2 + 𝐻3 × 1.75 + 4.93 + 11.52 + 11.52 × 1.75 − 12.48 − 4.86 × 15 − 4.16 − 1.62 × 9
+ 4.16 − 1.62 × 3 = 0
 H3 = 18.99 kN

σ 𝐹𝐻 = 0: 53.9 – H1 – H2 – H3 – H4 = 0  H4 = 7.85 kN
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)

Do the Following Level:


LEVEL N AND ABOVE
LEVEL P AND ABOVE
LEVEL Q AND ABOVE
LEVEL R AND ABOVE
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)

SHEAR FORCE IN BEAMS &


COLUMNS
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
0.99 1.32 0.99

1.70 3.96 3.96 1.68 3.5 m

K
3.87 5.16 3.87

4.93 11.52 11.52 5.13 3.5 m

L
7.62 10.16 7.62

M
8.13 18.93 18.99 7.85 3.5 m

6m 6m 6m
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)

BENDING MOMENTS IN
BEAMS & COLUMNS
Example 6: Lateral Load Analysis
(Cantilever Method)
2.97 3.96 2.97
2.98 6.93 6.93 2.94
2.97 3.96 2.97

11.61 15.48 11.61


2.98 8.63 20.16 20.16 8.98
6.93 6.93 2.94
11.61
15.48

22.86 30.48 22.86


14.23 33.13 33.23 13.74
8.63
20.16 20.16 8.98
22.86
18.60

14.23
33.13 33.23 13.74

Continues for Level


N, P, Q, R
Example 7
ANALYSIS OF ONE LEVEL SUB-
FRAME – VERTICAL LOAD
ONLY
Example 7: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame – Vertical Load Only
Roof

3.5 m
Level 6

3.5 m
Level 5

3.5 m
Level 4

3.5 m
Level 3

3.5 m
Level 2

3.5 m
Level 1

4m
A B C D

6m 6m 6m
Example 7: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame – Vertical Load Only
CASE 1: 1.2Gk + 1.2Qk

3.5 m 48.7 kN/m 46.1 kN/m 48.7 kN/m

Span 1 Span 2 Span 3

4m

6m 6m 6m

A B C D
Fixed End Moment
𝑤𝐿2 48.7 × 62
𝑀𝐴𝐵 = 𝑀𝐵𝐴 = = = 146.2 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
𝑤𝐿2 46.1 × 62
𝑀𝐵𝐶 = = = 138.4 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
𝑤𝐿2 48.7 × 62
𝑀𝐶𝐷 = = = 146.2 𝑘𝑁𝑚
12 12
Example 7: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame – Vertical Load Only
Moment Distribution Method
43.82 -9.97 -9.97 -43.82
0.27 -0.44 0.44 -0.27
1.60 -1.15 1.15 -1.60
0.36 -6.86 6.86 -0.32
41.60 -1.53 1.53 -41.60
0.28 A B 0.19 C 0.19 D 0.28
0.25 0.47 0.32 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.17 0.32 0.47 0.25
-146.2 146.2 -138.4 138.4 -146.2 146.2
36.4 68.2 -2.5 -1.3 -2.5 2.5 1.3 2.5 -68.2 -36.4
-1.3 34.1 1.3 -1.3 -34.1 1.3
0.3 0.6 -11.3 -6.0 -11.3 11.3 6.0 11.3 -0.6 -0.3
-5.6 0.3 5.6 -5.6 -0.3 5.6
1.4 2.6 -1.9 -1.0 -1.9 1.9 1.0 1.9 -2.6 -1.4
-0.9 1.3 0.3 -0.9 -1.3 0.9
0.2 0.4 -0.7 -0.4 -0.7 0.7 0.4 0.7 -0.4 -0.2
38.3 -82.2 165.6 -8.7 -146.9 146.9 8.7 -165.6 82.2 -38.3
Example 7: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame – Vertical Load Only
Reaction Calculation at Support

48.7 kN/m 48.7 kN/m


146.9 46.1 kN/m 165.6 82.2
82.2 165.6 146.9

6m 6m 6m

VBA VCB VCD VDC


VAB VBC

Solve for each span using equilibrium method of analysis:

VAB = 132.3 kN
VBA = 160.1 kN

VBC = 138.4 kN
VCB = 138.4 kN

VCD = 160.1 kN
VDC = 132.3 kN
Example 7: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame – Vertical Load Only
Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagram
138.4 160.1
132.3

SFD (kN) 3.0 m


2.7 m 3.3 m
132.3
156.2
160.1

165.6 165.6
146.9
146.9
82.2 82.2
43.8 43.8
BMD (kNm) 38.3 10.0 8.7 10.0 8.7
38.3

60.6
97.5 97.5

19.2 4.4 4.4 19.2


Example 7: Analysis of One Level Sub-
Frame – Vertical Load Only
Bending Moment due to Vertical Load (1.2Gk + 1.2Qk)
165.6 165.6
146.9
146.9
82.2 82.2
43.8 43.8
38.3 10.0 8.7 10.0 38.3
8.7

60.6
97.5 97.5

19.2 4.4 4.4 19.2

+
Bending Moment due to Wind Load, 1.2Wk (from your exercise)

=
Combination of Vertical & Wind Load

You might also like