To, Bhopal & Indore Metro General Consultant

KPTL-GULERMAK JV 10th Floor, Apollo Premier, Near Vijay

Lead Member: M/s Kalpataru Power Transmission Nagar Square, Indore, 452010
Ltd, Tower 3, IV floor, Okaya Centre B-5, Madhya Pradesh,
Sector 62, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Noida, India
Uttar Pradesh - 201309

Date : 06th February 2023

Contract: MPMRCL/Indore Metro/Package IN-09
Subject: Construction Surveillance Report (CSR) - 02

Letter Reference: IN-09-BIG-HMS-CSR-00002

Kind Attention: Mr. Aniruddha Kumar

Dear Sir,

Please find the attached Construction Surveillance Report for your information and necessary
compliance.
Observation
Description Negative Positive NCR No.

H&S management Operational Control Procedure

12 00 12
Deficiencies

Yours Faithfully,
Digitally signed by Fourie, Simon
DN: cn=Fourie, Simon, ou=Users,
email=Simon.Fourie@db-eco.com
Date: 2023.02.06 19:24:55
+05'30'

Simon Fourie
Project Director
General Consultant

Attachment: Construction Surveillance Report no. 002

Copy to: 1. Additional Director (Technical), MPMRCL

2. General Manager (Rolling Stock), MPMRCL

Page 1 of 1
 CONSTRUCTION SURVEILLANCE REPORT (CSR)
Contract No.: IN-09 Department: Health & Safety
Name: KPTL-GULERMAK Report No: IN-09-BIG-HMS-CSR-00001 (HEALTH &SAFETY)

Surveillance Report Details

Date 02-02-2023 Issued By Mr. Mirza Tabrez Baig

12:15 Finish 2:30
Location RSS & TSS buildings Start Time
AM Time PM
Teams GC Team MPMRCL-Team KPTL-GULERMAK-JV Sub-Contractor
Mr. M Tabrez Baig
Attendees: Mr. S. Chauhan Mr. Ravindra Patidar
Mr. Sudesh Dubey

H&S management Operational Control Procedure Deficiencies

1 2

3 4

Page 1 of 9
5 6

7 8

9 10

Page 2 of 9
 11 12

13 14

15 16

Page 3 of 9
17 18

20
19

Page 4 of 9
Description of Observation: (Attached Photograph for ready reference)

The following deficiencies were noticed during the site inspection on 02.02.2023, which clearly indicates the failure to
implement Health and Safety guidelines as per ER Vol. III H&S Manual:

1. Pic no 01 & 02 office area - Substandard Diesel Generator observed with no statutory compliance relevant to DG
safety requirements guidelines. this may lead to unwanted current output leakage, damage to the electrical
appliances on-site, and electrocution hazards.
2. Pic no 03 & 04- Working at height generic non-compliance observed at site RSS/TSS .this may lead to fall of
person hazards from height.
3. - Deep excavation safety requirements non-compliance(adequate edge protection, safe
access, signages) observed at site RSS/TSS .this may lead to a fall of personal risk from a height into the pit.
4. Pic nos 07,& 08- Scaffolding safety requirements non-compliance(adequate working platform, base plate, safe or
unsafe for use tag system, inspection check sheet, non-availability of competent scaffolders ) observed at site
RSS/TSS .makeshift inadequate arrangements of scaffolding for heightened column works could create unsafe
conditions for workman & fall of person risk during the work
5. Pic no 09- Tilted long rebar column found in the TSS building. this may lead to falling on anyone who comes near
the column.
6. Pic no 11- Pointed nails were found lying on the ground in an unsafe manner at various places on the site. No safe
storage method of any kind has been observed on the site. Due to this, there can be a danger of it entering the
soles of anyone's feet.
7. Pic no 12&16- power tools observed connected with energy sources unsafely unattended & anyone can operate
the tools unauthorisedly. there was no competent card given to the workers the operate the tools .this may lead to
major injury to those workmen .
8. Pic no 13- Protruding sharp rebar used for the support for beam shutters without rebar cap protection. This may
lead to a major piercing risk if fall of a person over on it due to slip trip hazards.
9. Pic no 14,15 & 19- Electrical power cable laying unsafely at RSS & steel yard .no provision made for underground
or overhead routing of power cable .this may lead to damage to the cable/electrical hazards while shifting the
material & working near. And PAT certification of electrical appliances was not evident at the site.
10. Pic no 18&20- welfare (rest shed, hand gloves)& pre-employment medical check-up of critical workman
operator(eye test by an ophthalmologist) category no compliances observed at site. this may lead to a violation of
the legal requirements of the BOCW act.
11. During surveillance it is observed that an approved copy of MS of civil works, and GFC drawings were not available
and work was going on without the statutory safety inspection by formats & fulfillment of contract requirements.
This may lead to attracting safety obligation penalties toward non-compliance of contract requirements on site in
case of repetition.
12. It is been observed that the submitted project H&S plan & policy were not reflected on-site to maintain the
contractual H&S principle.

Page 5 of 9
Action required by KPTL :

KPTL management action is required to avoid significant risks to achieving objectives and effective verification of
compliance with the safe system of work procedures (SOPs) to eliminate such types of unsafe conditions/Act, and
violations of system/control procedures of contract requirements.

Refer to the ER Volume III Health and Safety Manual, BOCW Central Rule 1998.

Controlling Documents
S. No. Document Rev

1. Volume III H&S manual 00

2. BOCW-A 00

OBSERVATIONS
S.
Description Specific Location Positive/Negative
No.
Pic no 01 & 02 office area - Substandard Diesel Generator
observed with no statutory compliance relevant to DG safety
1 requirements guidelines. this may lead to unwanted current Office Negative

output leakage, damage to the electrical appliances on-site,

and electrocution hazards.
Pic no 03 & 04- Working at height generic non-compliance
2 observed at site RSS/TSS .this may lead to fall of person RSS/TSS Negative

hazards from height

- Deep excavation safety requirements
non-compliance(adequate edge protection, safe access,
3 RSS/TSS Negative
signages) observed at site RSS/TSS .this may lead to a fall of
personal risk from a height into the pit.
Pic nos 07,& 08- Scaffolding safety requirements non-
compliance(adequate working platform, base plate, safe or
unsafe for use tag system, inspection check sheet, non-
4 availability of competent scaffolders ) observed at site RSS/TSS Negative

RSS/TSS .makeshift inadequate arrangements of scaffolding

for heightened column works could create unsafe conditions for
workman & fall of person risk during the work
Pic no 09- Tilted long rebar column found in the TSS building.
5 RSS/TSS Negative
this may lead to falling on anyone who comes near the column
Pic no 11- Pointed nails were found lying on the ground in an
6 RSS/TSS Negative
unsafe manner at various places on the site. No safe storage

Page 6 of 9
 method of any kind has been observed on the site. Due to this,
there can be a danger of it entering the soles of anyone's feet.
Pic no 12&16- power tools observed connected with energy
sources unsafely unattended & anyone can operate the tools
7 unauthorisedly. there was no competent card given to the RSS/TSS Negative

workers the operate the tools .this may lead to major injury to

Pic no 13- Protruding sharp rebar used for the support for beam RSS/TSS Negative
8 shutters without rebar cap protection. This may lead to a major
piercing risk if fall of a person over on it due to slip trip hazards
Pic no 14,15 & 19- Electrical power cable laying unsafely at RSS/TSS Negative

RSS & steel yard .no provision made for underground or

overhead routing of power cable .this may lead to damage to
9
the cable/electrical hazards while shifting the material &
working near. And PAT certification of electrical appliances was
not evident at the site.
Pic no 18&20- welfare (rest shed, hand gloves)& pre- RSS/TSS Negative

employment medical check-up of critical workman operator(eye

10 test by an ophthalmologist) category no compliances observed
at site. this may lead to a violation of the legal requirements of
the BOCW act
During surveillance it is observed that an approved copy of MS RSS/TSS Negative

of civil works, and GFC drawings were not available and work
was going on without the statutory safety inspection by formats
11
& fulfillment of contract requirements. This may lead to
attracting safety obligation penalties toward non-compliance of
contract requirements on site in case of repetition.
During surveillance, it is observed that the submitted project RSS/TSS Negative
12 H&S plan & policy were not reflected on-site to maintain the
contractual H&S principle
TOTAL POSITIVE 0 NEGATIVE -12

Is a Contractor NCR required? Yes NO

S. No. Description Specific Location Serial No.

1. Pic no 01 & 02 office area - Substandard Diesel Generator observed Office

with no statutory compliance relevant to DG safety requirements To be provided by KPTL-
guidelines. this may lead to unwanted current output leakage, damage GULERMAK
to the electrical appliances on-site, and electrocution hazards.

Page 7 of 9
 2. Pic no 03 & 04- Working at height generic non-compliance observed To be provided by KPTL-
at site RSS/TSS .this may lead to fall of person hazards from height Depot RSS/TSS GULERMAK

3. - Deep excavation safety requirements non- To be provided by KPTL-

compliance(adequate edge protection, safe access, signages) GULERMAK
Depot RSS
observed at site RSS/TSS .this may lead to a fall of personal risk from
a height into the pit

4. Pic nos 07,& 08- Scaffolding safety requirements non- Depot RSS/TSS To be provided by KPTL-
compliance(adequate working platform, base plate, safe or unsafe for GULERMAK
use tag system, inspection check sheet, non-availability of competent
scaffolders ) observed at site RSS/TSS .makeshift inadequate
arrangements of scaffolding for heightened column works could create
unsafe conditions for workman & fall of person risk during the work

5. Pic no 09- Tilted long rebar column found in the TSS building. this may Depot RSS/TSS To be provided by KPTL-
lead to falling on anyone who comes near the column GULERMAK

6. Pic no 11- Pointed nails were found lying on the ground in an unsafe Depot RSS/TSS To be provided by KPTL-
manner at various places on the site. No safe storage method of any GULERMAK
kind has been observed on the site. Due to this, there can be a danger
of it entering the soles of anyone's feet.

7. Pic no 12&16- power tools observed connected with energy sources Depot RSS/TSS To be provided by KPTL-
unsafely unattended & anyone can operate the tools unauthorisedly. GULERMAK
there was no competent card given to the workers the operate the tools

enough to operate the tools

8. Pic no 13- Protruding sharp rebar used for the support for beam Depot RSS/TSS To be provided by KPTL-
shutters without rebar cap protection. This may lead to a major piercing GULERMAK
risk if fall of a person over on it due to slip trip hazards

9. Pic no 14,15 & 19- Electrical power cable laying unsafely at RSS & Depot RSS/TSS To be provided by KPTL-
steel yard .no provision made for underground or overhead routing of GULERMAK
power cable .this may lead to damage to the cable/electrical hazards
while shifting the material & working near. And PAT certification of
electrical appliances was not evident at the site.

10. Pic no 18&20- welfare (rest shed, hand gloves)& pre-employment Depot RSS/TSS To be provided by KPTL-
medical check-up of critical workman operator(eye test by an GULERMAK
ophthalmologist) category no compliances observed at site. this may
lead to a violation of the legal requirements of the BOCW act

11. During surveillance it is observed that an approved copy of MS of civil Depot RSS/TSS To be provided by KPTL-
works, and GFC drawings were not available and work was going on GULERMAK
without the statutory safety inspection by formats & fulfillment of
contract requirements. This may lead to attracting safety obligation
penalties toward non-compliance of contract requirements on site in
case of repetition.

12. During surveillance, it is observed that the submitted project H&S plan Depot RSS/TSS To be provided by KPTL-
& policy were not reflected on-site to maintain the contractual H&S GULERMAK
principle

Check List:
S. No Requirements References Comment
1.01 Check the Safety requirements as per Physically Checked Not Evidenced
contract condition

Page 8 of 9
Prepared By: - Sudesh Dubey Designation: Safety Engineer Signed: Date: - 06-02-2023

06-02-2023
Reviewed By: - Mirza Tabrez Baig Designation Sr. Safety Expert Signed: Date: -

06-02-2023
Approved By: - Jose N Joseph Designation: Chief Safety Expert Signed: Date: -

Page 9 of 9