Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Republic of the Philippines

Cordillera Administrative Region DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Schools Division of Benguet Cordillera Administrative Region
SABLAN DISTRICT Schools Division of Benguet
BAYABAS MULTIGRADE SCHOOL SABLAN DISTRICT
BAYABAS MULTIGRADE SCHOOL
Bayabas, Sablan, Benguet
Bayabas, Sablan, Benguet
QAME Form 2: Program Evaluation
QAME Form 1: Session Evaluation
Respondent Type: Trainee Trainer Program Manager Session Topic : Date : ______
Name (Optional) Date : Jan. 24-26, 2024 Session Facilitator/Speaker :
Program Title: School-Based INSET on Empowering Teachers
Direction: Rate the session and the facilitator using the rating scale. Put a check/tick under the column of the
Direction: Please assess the effectiveness of the training program according to the indicators below. Put a
response.
check/tick under the appropriate column.
After the conduct of the training, I believe that .... Strongly Agree Disagree SESSION Strongly Agree Disagree
Agree In this session ... Agree
A. Program Management 1. The topic was relevant to our area of work.
1. The training program was delivered as planned. 2. The session was well planned.
2. The training program was managed effectively. 3. The objectives of the session were well-planned.
3. The training program was well-structured. 4. The time allotment for the topic was adequate.
B. Attainment of Objectives 5. The activities were appropriate for adult learners.
4. The program objectives were clearly presented. 6. Time start and to end were observed.
5. The program and session objectives were attained. 7. The learning materials were adequate and relevant.
C. Delivery of Content 8. The support materials were adequate.
6. Program content was appropriate to trainees. 9. The participants were engaged in the activities.
7. Content delivered was based on authoritative and reliable sources. 10. The participants were able to demonstrate their learning.
8. The session activities were effective in generating learning. FACILITATOR/RESOURCE SPEAKERS
9. Adult learning methodologies were used effectively. 1. Exhibited full grasp of the topic
10. Management of learning was effectively structured. 2. Was sensitive to the participants mood
11.Contribution of all trainees were encouraged. 3. Asked stimulating questions
12. Trainees demonstrated a clear understanding of the content delivered. 4. Processed questions and responses to deepen learning
D. Provision of Support Materials 5. Maintained positive learning environment
13. The support materials provided were appropriate to the trainees’ needs. 6. Expressed ideas clearly
14. Support materials provided were adequate and were given on time. 7. Used appropriate training aids.
E. Program Management Team 8. Observed appropriate attire.
15. Program Management Team members were courteous. 9. Was able to firm up attainment of objectives of the session
16. Program management Team was efficient. COMMENTS and SUGGESTIONS:
17. Program Management Team was responsive to the needs of trainees.
Venue and Accommodation
18. The venue was lighted.
19. The venue was well-ventilated.
20. The venue was comfortable with sufficient space for program activities.
21. The venue had sanitary and hygienic conditions with adequate comfort rooms.
22. Meals were nutritious and sufficient in quantity and quality.
23. Meals were generally well-prepared and tasty.
24. The accommodation was comfortable with sanitary and hygienic conditions.
Please provide your hones response to each of the following questions: (Write your answers on the space provided.
1. What do you consider your most significant learning from the program? Name of Participant/s (Optional) :

2. What further learning do you still need? School (Optional) :

3. What changes would you suggest to improve similar programs in the future? Division and Region:

Thank you!!!llcarame Thank you!!!llcarame