You are on page 1of 3

1

PHILIPPINE NORMAL UNIVERSITY


National Center for Teacher Education
Taft Avenue, Manila

RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING TEACHER


DEMONSTRATION TEACHING PERFORMANCE

Name of Teacher: Hidalgo, Pamela Jean G_________________________________________________________________


Subject and Grade Level Taught: English 7_______________________ Date of Teaching: April 6, 2024 _____________________________
Name of Evaluator: Joanna Angelina L. Dela Cruz Demo Grade: 7

Check the corresponding column.

PPST NOT
OBSERVED REMARKS
Domain OBSERVED
A. Lesson Planning
4 – S2 1. Stated clear and precise objectives Feasible and
✔ good objectives
4 – S3 2. Prepare relevant and appropriate learning tasks and Good during
activities reading activity.
After reading
passages, there
✔ is an activity to
analyze the
figures of
speech.
3. Neatness and proper format are observed Interesting
presentations
✔ and visually
pleasing
B. Directing Teaching-Learning Situation
1 - S7 1. States clear and precise objectives to the class Good objectives
✔ presented in the
class.
1 – S7 2. Integrates past to new lesson There is no past
or prior
✔ knowledge
connected to
the new lesson
1 – S7 3. Gives clear directions, logical presentation and Was able to
explanation verbalize
instructions and
repeat as
✔ needed,
questions are
also clarified.
Explanations
are also present
1 – S4 4. Uses contextualization and/or differentiated activities
appropriate to learner’s need
1 – S1 5. Demonstrates mastery of content within and/or across Good mastery
curriculum teaching area of lesson –
knowing figures
✔ of speech and
explaining the
learner’s
question
1 - S5 6. Integrates activities to develop 21st century skills Very good, uses
various sites to
present and do
✔ activities. This
integrates 21st
century skills in
the class.
1 – S5 7. Asks appropriate and varied types of questions to Very good
develop critical and creative thinking questions and
lets the
✔ students to
critical thinking,
but sometimes
2

there is no prior
knowledge
activated which
may hinder
student
participation
1 – S7 8. Uses verbal and non-verbal classroom communication There are no
strategies gestures seen
for verbal
✔ communication
but there is a
verbal cue most
of the time
1 – S1 9. Clarifies misconceptions immediately x
1 – S6 10. Displays proficient use of Mother Tongue, Filipino or Both are used
English to facilitate teaching and learning ✔ as needed, very
good
2 – S3 11. Pays attention on routine matters Has good
routine. Prayer,
attendance, and
✔ motivation was
done before
formal
discussion.
2 - S4 12. Motivates and keeps learners attention and interest Calls learners
one by one, and
tries getting the
attention of
✔ learners who
are
unresponsive,
very good.
3 – S6 13. Manages learners behavior constructively Very good with
asking learners
if they are still
✔ there, but there
are no other
reinforcements
given
3 – S1-5 14. Exhibits sensitivity to students personal, cultural,
x
gender differences and disabilities
C. Assessment of Learning
5 – S1 1. Conducts appropriate assessment/ evaluation Closure activity
in the LP is
appropriate and
✔ was able to
showcase
today’s topic
5 – S5 2. Presents appropriate rubrics before actual evaluation There is also a
(if necessary) ✔ rubric suited for
the activity
D. Utilization of Instructional Materials
4 – S5 1. Instructional materials are appropriate for the activity Good use of
given and/ or ICT different sites
✔ and has good
activities online
4 – S1 2. Show the teacher creativity and resourcefulness ✔ Very creative
4 – S5 3. Integrates materials (examples, cases, simulation) ✔
4 – S5 4. Utilizes instructional materials properly and Uses IMs
efficiently) ✔ properly during
class discussion
E. Values Integration
1. Observed clear connection between the value and the Learners
topic. understood
✔ critical thinking
and has good
connection
2. Used good processing questions. Good
✔ processing
3

questions which
activates critical
thinking
3. Value was elicited from the students. Value was able
✔ recognized by
the learner
4. Value was integrated naturally and creatively. Value was
integrated
naturally – good
job!
5. Value integration was successful or unsuccessful. ✔ SUCCESSFUL!

Joanna Angelina Dela Cruz


__________________________________________________
Evaluator’s Name and Signature

You might also like