, ;

1
"

" .
,
. :
" ?"

"So, it is no wonder that the discussion (over markets) has become thickly
encrusted with ideology. And one convenient way to turn subtle argument into
ideology is to create dichotomies where there are originally fine gradations of
more and less. For example: are you for or against "the free market?".
)(Robert Solow, The New Republic, 12.1.2010

):
( .1995 ,
. , ,
: 1995 ?;
?.
,
. / ,
, . ,
"" , , ,
. ?
. ,
, ,
) ( , - ,
/ .
,
.

* 1 , ,"
. .
1
 - ""
, .
.
.
.
.

1 ""
, ,
, .

, .
) ;2006 .(2010 ,
)
.(2010 ,
, .
, ,
.
,
, -
.
""
, -
. ,
"" :
" , , ) (
, , .
, , .
: -- ;
-- - . " (1) :
" -- /
) , - (; )" (2
'" ) (; ) (3
,
, "" "'" .,
-".

2
 ,
.
, , .

:1

Saltman and von Otter, 1992 :

.1 , ,
- .
.
,
, )Arrow
.(1963, Altman el 1999, Altman and Schachtman 2011 ,
, . ,

,
) .(Saltman and Von Otter 1992 ,
,
, . ,
,
. ,

.
,
, :
.;
.;
.;2
..

2 ,
, "" "" .
, . ,
, ) - (vouchers
- , , .
" .

3
 ) .(1990
.
. ,
,
.
,
, .
, ,
,
, " . ,
,
, ,
.
.
,
. ,
, . , ,
.

3
2 :

.
.
" " .
, .
1994 ,
, .
82% - ,1950 66%- 1994 52%- .2010-
3.4% - 1950, 17.6% - ,1994 25.3%-) 2010 -
,2005 .(2010
, . 1948
. ,
,
"-- , .
, , ,
" " . , ,
3 : ,

4
 , .
-
. ,
- ,
.
""
, .
, ,
- - ,
. ,
"" , "" .,
,
.
)- .(2005 , ,
, - : .

.
, , ,
,- - .
,
.
,
. , ,
, , .
,
. , ,
. ,
- .
- -
, ,
. ) (CT, MRI
.
, .
- , .
,
, .
,

5
 .
,
,
. , ) . ,
.(1993

) ( .1988
) , ( , ,
, . ,
, "
.
.( Chinitz 1995) 1994-
, .
:
) (
,
.
,
.
, .
" " , " " ) ,Chinitz 1995 - .(2005
,
,
.

1994
.
- ,
: . ; .
.

, /
. ,
. :

6
 , -
5% , , .
,

. .
, ,
;
.
)(
,
. ,
,
: , .
, ,
.
) (.

.3 1995
:;
; ; )(.

.1 :
.1
, :
.
) ( , ,
. ,1 ,1990
- 47%- -
" , OECD- .2009

:1 ) 1990 -( -

"
" "
6.6 46.9 46.5 26 20.5 1990
4.5 49.8 22.5 27.3 1994

7
 2.6 26.5 30.3 66.9 21.3 21.5 24.1 1995
2.2 25.5 30.2 67.7 24 2.3 41.3 1997
2.2 29 35.5 62.2 25.4 0 36.8 2000
2 29.5 38.7 59.4 25.2 0 34.2 2005
1.7 27.5 38.2 60.1 26.6 0 33.5 2010
:" , 39 ) 2011 (OECD

, ,
) 90% (,
".
1 1997
. , .
, . ,
90% - ) .(2010 , ,
,2005 2009- 1995 99-" )
.(2010 "
) .(2010

.2
,
: , .
"" ,
. ,
"" . ,
,

. " " , ,
) .(2010
,
) ( , "" -
.
2 ; , ,
.
)""( - ,
,
. ,1995
.

:2

8
 : 2005 ,

2 :
.
,
, . ,
.

: 2

: 2005 ,

9
 .3
1 )
( , ,
) (4%- ) .(6% - ,
, ,
.3

: 3 1992-2009 :
2009 2007 2003 1999 *1992
5.1% 5.3 4.8% 4.1% 3.5% % "


29.5 25.5 19.5 16.6 5.2 ) +(
25.5 28.3 31.2 33 43.3
18.6 19.4 19.4 24.9 16.8
26.4 26.8 24 25.4 34.6
*

) (
) . ,
( .
. ,
.
, 5% 1995- 7%-) 2009- (,
) ,2010
.(2009 ,
-
) 22% 2007- 27% ,(2005-
) 30% 2007- 19% .(2005-
. ,
) .(2007 ,

3 5.2%- 1992- 29%--

.2009 " , 63%- ,
. , 1995- 35%- +22
, 80% - .
1998-
. , , ,
.

10
 ?
. ,' ' :
" ... " " .
,
. ,
) ".'( 2010 ,
, ,
:
" " , , , )
( , ) ( , )
( . , " .
" ,
""
" .
, " ,
") ".-2011 ,
.
.
)' .(2010
,
. , ,2010- 30%-
- 900- - , ). (2011

. , , 2010
.
" , .
, ,
1.5 - , 62% -
84% ) .(2010 ,
,
.
.
35% ,2003 72% --
.81%
) .(2011
, ,
:

11
 ,1998 : ,
) .(2010 ,
, ,
) (2011
" ) (
, .
) .(2010
,
.
,
, ) (1997 ,
, 2002
.

, ,
.-
- " ".

.4
, .
, ,
. 1
, 6.6%- 1990 - 2.2% - ,1995- 2% -
.

.
.1
, ," ,
) .(3 ,
. , 2002 4%
, 9% - )
.(2005
.

:4 2010 -1988
' )( ' )(

12
 2010 1988
46.6 46.5
30.3 30.5
19.6 20 :,
"
3.5 3.1
: , 2005 , : , 2010 ,

4
. , ,5
. ,
"" , ) ( .
,
"" .

:5

91.7 39,078 72.3 27,318 : 2002
98.5 486,608 18.4 92,895

95.2 51,410 74 41,984 : 2005

102.7 513,063 17 99,123

95.8 51,880 74 42,640 : 2008

102 535,244 17.4 101,391
: , 2008 ,

,
, . ,
, .
,
, )
;1993 .(2006 ,

.2
,6 1995
.
, .
. ,
, ,

13
 .
- , .

:6
2010 1988
(6.6%) 227 ) 2,419(40%-

(59%) 13975 ) 3,800(36%-

: , , 2005 , : , 2010

. 3.
1995 .
.
,
.

. :
1.
1995
.

, . ,1995-98 3.5%-
, . ,
.

.2.
,1995 ,
.
. .
, .
, .
.
"" .
,1995
.
, .

14
 .3.
1995
.
, .
.
)"( " ,
, ,
. " " ,

. ," , ,
.
, .
. ,
.
.
,
. , ,1996
30%- ,
) .(1996 ,

. ,
)Feder Bubis
(and Chinitz 2010
""
. " .
,
. .
.
. 2004
,
) ,(2002 . ,
.
" .
,
. ," .
, "
.
15
 , ,
.
,
.

. : ""
,1995 ,
, . ,
. , 70%-
- .
. ,
, .
, .
, -
. ,
)
( - . , ,
) ( ,
.
" ,
.
, , ,
.
, " ,

, .
.

. , ,
.((Chinitz 2005,2007; Chinitz and Israeli 2011
, ,
. ,
- . ,
, - .
, , , .
, .
-

16
 ) , , (
(Chinitz and Israeli, 2011) .

1995
.1 .
.
.
.
.2
, .
.3 .
, .

. 2007 "
" .
2010 ,2009 .2011-
.
,
. ,
"" ,
. ,
, , ,
.
, ,
, .
).(Chinitz, Maslin, Grau, 2009
.4
. .
, - .
.

) ' ,2007 .(2012
) .(2012 ,

.4

17
 ,
- .
, .
, .
, ,
, .
, .
,
, .
.-
,
. ,
, . , ,
, " ,
, , .

7 -

.
) ,1995 (1998
+
+
+



+ +
20% - ;
- ; ---

+ ""


+ .

+ .
+ .

18
 " " )
( , 7 .
, ,
; , .
/ , .
,
, -
.
,
, .

, , ,
.
, ) ,2010
,(0-8 ,
. ,
-
. , ,
.

.5

,
.1994 , , ,
) :(14.3.12 ,
" , , ,
" " , .
, ,
, .
, , .
,
, -
.
. :
, .1
.

19
 , . .2
, .3
. ,
, " " ".

,
, .
, ) (
. -
--
.
,
) (policy learning .
,
. ,
, .
,
. , ,
. , .
) ,(2011
.
. , 15% -
,
4
85% - , .
35%- ,
. ,
, ,
- , .
,
,
.

4
" . -OECD , ,
.

20
 ,
, ,OECD-
) .(2007 , ,
"" .
, ,
.
. , ,
.

,
:
.1 - -
. ,
,
. ,
, -
. ,
.

.2 .
. )
( ,
.
,1.5%- .
. -
) ;1999 ,1998 ,(2010
.

.3 ,
. " "
) .(Chinitz, Meislin, Grau, 2009
. ,
.
- ) ,(2010
.

21
 .4 )(4%
.
.
.
, 8%- .

.

.5 " ,
,
, ".
" .
,
" ) .(2010 , " ,
,
; / -
) (;
, ; .
,
. ,
, ) (2006 "
. , , ,
) .(2003
, " - .
" ,
) : ( ,
.

.6
. ,
,
. ,
. ,
. ) .(2010

.

22
 .7
.
- , .
.

.8 .
,
, .
. " " ,
. ,

, .

***
, ,
. ,
, : ;
; ;
.
. ,
- -
, .
,
.

.2012 , ; 2 ,
-" :2010 , : : ".
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4002964,00.html
, , .2005 , ; .
, .2005 , :

, , .2007 , : ,OECD-
: .
.2010 . : ,(233) 2010
.2011 ,
;2010
- .2012 ,
, .
,- , .2007 ,
, : .

23
 .2010 , : .
, :
;(2010) , .1962-2008:
.
. 2009 , :
, ) ,(2010 , . 1995-2009
: .
, , .1993 , : ,
: .
, , , , .1996 ,
, : .
) ,(2010
" " .
.2012 , :
24.2.12
,2010 , 64
.1991 , :
, : .
: ; 2006
, .
.2003 ," : .
.2004 , , ,
.
.1999 , ,.
) (2010 2008
,2010 , . .
,2010 , . " :
- , :

, 2010" . ?"
27.12.10 ,
- " .1997, -
" , ," 521-556
- ) (2006 .

' , , " .2010 ,
"; .
, )" .(1999 ?" , 92-109 :54
, .2002, :
.
, .1990 , , : .
, , .2006 , :
, : .
,- 2005 ?1994 :
)( :

, .1997 , :
, : .

Arrow K 1963. Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of of Health Care. American
Economic Review 53:5 940=73.
Altman S, Schactman D 2011 Power, Politics and Universal Health Care Amherst
NY: Prometheus Books.
Altman SH, Reinhardt UE and Schachtman D (eds) 1999 Regulating Managed Care.
San Francisco: Jossey Bass

24
Chinitz D 1995 Israels Health Policy Breakthrough, the Politics of Reform and the
Reform of Politics. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 20: 909-32.
Chinitz, David 2005. "The Art of Qualitics: Towards Better Regulation and
Management of Health Systems," Deah Rovachat 41: 20-22 (Hebrew).
, 2007. "Coping Accountably in a Dangerous World," Health Economics, Policy and
Law 2(4): 449-456.
Chinitz, David and Rachel Meislin, 2010. "Israel: Partial Health Care Reform as
Laboratory of Ongoing Change," in Okma Kieke, and Luca Crevelli (eds.), Seven
Countries, Seven Reform Models, Singapore: World Scientific Press.
Chinitz, David., Rachel Meislin, and Ilana. Grau, 2009. "Values, Institutions and
Shifting Policy Paradigms," Health Policy 90: 3744.
Chinitz David and Israeli Avi (2011) Hospital Governance in Israel: in Governing
Hospitals in Europe in Saltman RB, Duran A, and Dubois H (eds) Governing General
Hospitals in Europe Brussels: WHO European Observatory on Health Care Systems .
Hisrchmann, Albert O., 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty, Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
Israeli, Avi, 2010. "Responsibility and Accountability: Talk is Cheap," in Rosen
Bruce., Avi Israeli, and Stephen Shortell (eds.), Health and Health Care: Who is
Responsible, Who is Accountable? Singapore: World Scientific Press, forthcoming.
Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. The Science of Muddling Through. Public
Administration Review 19:79 88.
Rosen, Bruce 2010. Israel: Health Systems in Transition, Copenhagen: World Health
Organization.
Saltman, Richard B, Casten von Otter, 1992. Planned Markets and Public
Competition, Open University Press.
Solow, R., 2010. Hedging America: review of "How Markets Fail", by John Cassidy,
The New Republic, January 12.

25