COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL

This school level Comprehensive School Safety Monitoring Tool is aligned with the Sendai Framework for DRR (SFDRR) and the global Comprehensive School Safety Framework (
International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). As a signatory to the SFDRR, the Philippine Government is expected to report to the UNISDR its accomplishment in implem
this, the Department of Education is required to report its accomplishment in implementing Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM)/School Safety to the National DRRM C
member of the said council, and in accordance to RA 10121 (Philippine DRRM Act of 2010) which reflects the country's commitment to the SFDRR.
This school level Comprehensive School Safety Monitoring Tool aims to:
1) establish the baseline with respect to the implementation of the 3 pillars of DepEd's Comprehensive DRRM in Education Framework (DO 37, s 2015);
2) Set the school's DRRM targets for 3 years, based on the baseline;
3) Track the annual progress of the school with respect to its targets.
This is primarily for the use of the School DRRM Team whose members are expected to facilitate the completion of this monitoring tool. The Head of the SDRRM Team shall submit
signature of he School Head to the Division DRRM Coordinator. The Division DRR Coordinator is expected to orient the SDRRM Team on how this tool is going to be filled-up, mon
and consolidate the results of all schools using the template also provided by the DRRMS Central Office. The consolidated results shall be submitted by the Division DRRM Coordin
Office in ____________ of the current school year.
The 1st column indicates the particular Priority for Action in the SFDRR that are related to the Targets of the global CSSF in the 2nd column. The 3rd column indicates DepEd's Com
indicators at the school level that are related to columns 1 and 2. The school level DepEd indicators are based on the Department's Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRR
DRRM Manual (SDRRM). The 4th column sets the baseline of the school with respect to DepEd's indicators in the 3rdBASELINEcolumn. Supporting evidences, such as documents, should be
DRRM Team to the Division DRRM Coordinator. The 5th column sets the targets/plans of the school based on its baseline. The remaining columns will be accomplished by the scho
indicate progress against the targets set for 3 years.

Name of Head/Focal Person of School DRRM Team: MARJORIE D. PILON Designation:

School ID: 103823 Name of School: ABRA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Municipality/City:
Name of Division DRRM Coordinator: Arcadio Madumo Division/Region:
Date the Division DRRM Coordinator Oriented the SDRRM Team: VIRGINIA G. ALMAZAN: TARGETS/ PLANS
Related
DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS
Sendai ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Global Comprehensive
Framework
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR
TARGET AREAS (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and YES
(SFDRR) NO
School DRRM Manual)
Priorities
Priority for Legal Frameworks & 1 Adopted/Adapted/localized existing policies relating to DRRM in / (2019-2021)
Action 2 Policies education/school safety
(2018)
Organizational 2 Designated School DRRM Focal Person /
Priority for arrangements, leadership, 3 Formed School DRRM Team, consisting of personnel from different /
Action 2 and coordination for risk offices; with defined membership and roles and
reduction and resilience responsibilities/functions
4 Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes CCA and /
EiE measures, covering risk assessment, risk reduction, and
Integration of risk reduction
rehabilitation and recovery
Priority for and resilience into
Action 1 education sector strategies, 5 Students participated in the planning process /
policies and plans 6 Integrated DRRM into the School Improvement Plan (SIP) /

Page 1 of
Priority for and resilience into
Action 1 education sector strategies,
policies and plans
7 100% completion of DRR related questions in the EMIS/EBEIS /
8 Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget /
Funding for risk reduction 9 Funding sources for interventions in the aftermath of a disaster or /
Priority for emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
and resilience of education
Action 3
sector 10 School has partnerships that could be tapped to support its DRRM /
programs and activities, including those after a disaster

Page 2 of
 11 Conducted student-led school watching and hazard mapping (DO /
23 s 2015)
12 Incorporated results of student-led school watching and hazard /
Priority for Child-centered Risk mapping in the School DRRM Plan and SIP
Action 1 Assessment 13 Linked student-led school watching and hazard mapping with the /
community hazard maps of LGUs provided by DOST
14 School Planning Team have linked the community hazard maps /
with education data to better understand the school’s risk
15 School submitted Rapid Assessment of Damage Report (RADAR) /
to the DRRMS Central Office, within 72 hours after the onslaught of
a hazard in the area
Priority for 16 Data collection and consolidation of programs and activities on /
Monitoring and Evaluation DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and impact exist
Action 3

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 3 of
mework for DRR (SFDRR) and the global Comprehensive School Safety Framework (CSSF) developed by the UN
pine Government is expected to report to the UNISDR its accomplishment in implementing the SFDRR. In line with
ster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM)/School Safety to the National DRRM Council (NDRRMC) as a
ch reflects the country's commitment to the SFDRR.

rehensive DRRM in Education Framework (DO 37, s 2015);

e the completion of this monitoring tool. The Head of the SDRRM Team shall submit the completed forms with the
is expected to orient the SDRRM Team on how this tool is going to be filled-up, monitor the completion of schools
al Office. The consolidated results shall be submitted by the Division DRRM Coordinator to the DRRMS Central

argets of the global CSSF in the 2nd column. The 3rd column indicates DepEd's Comprehensive School Safety
tors are based on the Department's Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) policies and the School
's indicators in the 3rd column. Supporting evidences, such as documents, should be provided by the School
hool based on its baseline. The remaining columns will be accomplished by the school on an annual basis to

PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS

TEACHER-IN-CHARGE
SANTIAGO CIT
2

BLING ENVIRONMENT

(2019) (2020) (2021)

Page 4 of
Page 5 of
Page 6 of
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Global Comprehensive
Framework
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR
TARGETS
Existing schools are being made safer, systematically
Assessment and
Priority for prioritization for retrofiting 2 # of school buildings with risk assessment
Action 1 and replacement of unsafe
schools
Resources and Plan to
Priority for
address unsafe school
Action 3
buildings
Maintenance to increase
Priority for
safety and protection of
Action 3
investments in schools
Planning for limited use of
Priority for schools as evacuation
Action 4 centers, during the school
year
Every new school built is safe
Priority for Guidance and regulations
Action 2 for safe school construction
Monitoring of safe school
Priority for
site selection, design and
Action 2
construction
Name and Signature of School Head:
Date Signed and Approved:
PILLAR 1: SAFE LEARNING FACILITIES
(Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and NO.
1 # of school buildings that has been inventoried 9 one building for demolition and one
buildong to be constructed
2 2019
3 # of unsafe school buildings identified 2 2019
YES NO
4 Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school building /
5 construction exist are allocated for completion of needed action to /
Financial resources
address unsafe school buildings within a specified period
6 # of unsafe school buildings with appropriate action undertaken by
the School Head (e.g. upgraded, retrofitted, non-usage, etc.) /
7 Conducted regular school inspection and maintenance of facilities /
8 conducted
Undertaken(state how
regular often)
repair of minor classroom (including facilities) /
damages
9 Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined, /
documented and assigned
10 School Heads have allotted budget for routine maintenance of /
school facilities for safety and to protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level
11 School Heads have identified those schools that are expected to be /
used as temporary evacuation centers for disasters
12 School Heads are clear with the roles and functions of the school in /
camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and DSWD as per Joint
Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2013 "Guidelines on
Evacuation Center Coordination and Management" and RA 10821
"Children's Emergency Relief and Protection Act" and its
corresponding IRR
13 Guidance and regulations on the following are followed:
safe school site selection /
resilient design, and /
resilient construction /
14 New school construction is monitored for compliance with: /
safe school site selection /
safe school design /
safe school construction
MARJORIE D. PILON
Page 7 of
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Global Comprehensive
Framework
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR
TARGETS
Existence of national and
sub-national plans for
preparedness and
Priority for
response, educational
Action 4
continuity, and protection of
education sector
investments
Annual review of school 11 annually
disaster risk reduction and
Priority for management measures (e.g. 12 preparedness measures are in place as per DO
Action 4 as part of school-based
management and/or school
improvement) 13 Brigada Eskwela
Conduct of regular
simulation drill, at all levels,
Priority for to practice response
Action 4 preparedness and to review
response plans (i.e.
Contingency Plan)
Needs assessment,
strategy, and
Priority for implementation plan to
Action 3 develop staff and student
capacity for participation in 21 and learners
school based DRRM
PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
(Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and YES NO
School has a Contingency Plan, i.e. Preparedness Plan turned into
1 response actions when a disaster strikes (This could be a separate
section/chapter in the DRRM Plan)
School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid kit in every
2 instructional classroom
School has at least 2 necessary and functioning equipment, in case
3 of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, handheld/base radio, generator,
etc.)
School has pre-identified spaces for putting up Temporary Learning
4 spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a disaster
School has ready resumption strategies and alternative delivery
5 modes to ensure education continuity
School has ensured that students completed the Family Earthquake
6 Prepareness Plan; and school has reported completion to DepEd
DRRM at the Central Office
School has established a school personnel tracking system/protocol
7 in the event of a disaster
School has trained personnel to administer first aid to students and
8 personnel
9 School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and students
School has trained teachers and other personnel who could provide
10 psychosocial support to students
School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are reviewed
Conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure school safety and
Students, teachers, parents and other stakeholders participated in
School has established functional early warning system to inform
students and personnel of hazards and emergencies (protocol,
14 warning signs, devices, IEC), considering national and LGU
warning systems and protocols
School conducted regular hazard-specific drills (at least 3 hazards)
15 with participation of stakeholders (BFP, Medic, LGUs, NGOs,
community, PTA, alumni, and others)
16 # of students who participated in the drills
17 School has an evacuation plan and procedures
School has a student-family reunification plan that is clearly
18 disseminated to students, teachers and parents
School Head has received DRRM training from division or region or
19 partners
School DRRM Team has received DRRM training from division or
20 region or partners (indicate how many)
School has conducted awareness and capacity building for families
School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EiE activities of the
22
LGU
Page 8 of
Name and Signature of School Head:
Date Signed and Approved:

Page 9 of
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Global Comprehensive PILLAR 3: RISK REDUCTION AND RESILIENCE EDUCATION
Framework
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR
TARGETS 1 School has integrated (Based onand
key DRR DepEd’s DRRM Policies
CCA concepts in the and
YES NO
curriculum based on the National Curriculum Guide
Integration of common risk 2 Year when DRR and CCA integration in the curriculum started
Priority for
reduction and resilience
Action 3 3 Grade levels and subjects where DRR and CCA been integrated
messages in the curriculum
Skills and competencies of students are assessed through
measurable learning and risk reduction (RR) outcomes YES NO
4 Percentage of students actively participating in various
Intergration of risk DRRM/CCA/EiE activities
Priority for
reduction and resilience in
Action 3
extra-curricular activities

5 School has a DRRM capacity building plan for teachers and school
Capacity building for and personnel YES NO
Priority for
personnel on risk reduction
Action 3 6 Number personnel trained on DRRM and/or CCA
and resilience education YES NO

7 Schoo has available and accessible quality and up-to-date DRRM YES NO
8 materials
Presence of DRRM corner, with updated IEC materials posted in it,
in every classroom YES NO

Priority for 9 School carries out monitoring and evaluation to assess sustainable
Monitoring and Evaluation implementation YES NO
Action 3

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 10 of