You are on page 1of 2

NON-CONFORMITY CUM RESOLUTION NCR No.

: MTHL-
REPORT (NCR) OSD-NCR-006

Date: 31-May-2021

Project & Customer : MTHL (Pck-02) & MMRDA Subcontractor /Supplier : M/s. DWST
W.O / PO No. : ---- Package / Equipment : OSD Assembly
Drg. No. & Rev. No. : SW-02-S373 B0 (J37), SW- MRR / IMIR No. & Date : NA
02-S379 B0 (J40) & SE-02-S363 B0 (J32), Part / Item Description : TCB Bolts (M22) of 105 &
115 mm lengths, S10T Grade
Line / Joint No. / Location / Structure No.: NA
*Category of NCR: ☒ Major ☐ Minor
Specified Requirement Description of Non-Conformity

As per Bolt tightening procedure No. DWST- The bolts of following sizes were failed in the
MTHL-QP-014, Rev-02, the performance of the performance testing. However, these rejected bolts
bolts shall be determined by testing the bolts were already tightened in Large-block transverse
using axial force meter, before assembly. joints.

After satisfactory testing results, bolts shall be Sr. Length LB Joint Batch No. Rej.
issued to assembly and further tightening. No (mm) Assy. No. Qty.
No.
1 115 SE2- J32 B1283013A 612
B4
2 105 SW2- J37 B1283012A 652
B5
3 115 SW2- J40 B1283013A 612
B5

All the values (*) are out of the tolerance limits.


Quality Manager (DTJV) :
Rahul Jaitpal

Non-Conformity related to (Tick appropriate reason):


☐ Drawing revision / Modification / drawing error; ☐ Mismatch of Civil drg. with Mech & Elec drg, ☐ Defective workmanship / Materials /
Equipment, ☐Transit Damages, ☐ Mishandling of items at site, ☐ Improper storage, ☐ Inspection Error, ☐ Approved Procedures /
FQP / QAP not followed, ☐ Natural Calamities, ☐ Inadequate Inputs / Resources/ QA System / Materials

Proposed Resolution (Tick appropriate box): ☐ Accept as it is ☒ Rework ☐ Repair ☐ Reject

Details of Rework / Repair / Reason for accepting as it is :

Quality Manager (Sub- Manager (DTJV) : Agreed date of closure:


contractor/ Supplier) :

Final Disposition: ☐ Accepted ☐ Accepted with deviation ☐ Rejected


Non Conformity related to (Tick appropriate reason):
(i) Drawing revision / Modification / drawing error, (ii) Mismatch of Civil drg. with Mech & Elec drg, (ii) Defective workmanship / Materials /
Equipment, (iv) Transit Damages, (v) Mishandling of items at site, (vi) Improper storage, (vii) Inspection Error, (viii) Approved Procedures
/ FQP / QAP not followed, (ix) Natural Calamities, (x) Inadequate Inputs / Resources/ QA System / Materials

Details of Correction done:


Quality Manager (Sub- FQE / Quality Customer** Actual date of closure:
contractor/ Supplier) : Manager (DTJV) :

Root Cause Analysis by 5 Why Method:

Why

Why

Why

Why

Why

Quality Manager (Sub-contractor/ Supplier) : Quality Manager (DTJV) :

Corrective Action based on 5 Why Analysis:

Quality Manager (Sub-contractor/ Supplier) : Quality Manager (DTJV) :

* Major: Non-conformities which require Engineering / Customer approval / Revision of drawing / Major Rework.
* Minor: Non-conformities which do not fall in the above categories. 5 Why Analysis is not required for Minor NCs.

Distribution: DTJV / GC ** ** If applicable

Form No. FQ/008, Rev No. 5

You might also like