Professional Documents
Culture Documents
c,R
3
I nte lle ctu al Pr op ert y
Intell ec tual prope rty (IP) is a valu able reso u rce in the n1 od ern knowl
edge-
dri ve n econo my. It has bee n see n th a t rn a n y s111all firms do not
make tbr
n ecessa ry in ves tm e nts to d eve lop , ac qui re , 111 ainta jn, and prote ct intelle
crnal
p ro p e rt y. In thi s ch a pte r, we wilJ li st vari o us kind s of intell ectua l prope
rty. the
legal and proce dural fram e work supp o rtin g th em, and the st r ategy
for small
ent re pre ne uri al fi r ms in thi s e n viro nn1 e nt.
Man y resea rc h e rs su ch as Auclr e tsc h ( ] 995) and Con1 pers and
Lernrl
( 1999) have stress ed the rol e o f inno vation in th e succe ss of entre
p re t1euri;il
fir m s. _Slnrn g IP laws wo uld lea d to Lh e pro tect io n of IP ri ght ~ nd
a , heir
e.':l tc1 IJJ 1s h an cnLre p r c n e uri a l clim a te . O n th e o th er h a n d , Bh1
cle (lOO,~ !.
derno nstr;.itcd that th e bulk of n ew fir ms a r e n o L innov atiu.~ b11
. . . l t n~e ,e
. . 1
lTlJJt rt [ J\ ' C. 01 1e 1·s "> Li ch els B urke , F it zroy and No la n (2000) ha\·e also ,nc l1 c;irec ' ,n
srn. 11·1;-1r I-111c1111
,- ,~..,_
· 111 s ue I1 ;1 ~ccna · ·
ri o , sl-ro n g I P law s \\' o ul d sen·e 10 su-e ng·tlit:ill
/;i p~-c lir111.._ ~111cl 111;1kc' i11 1i1c1 1i o n m ore cJ ir\icul l. \ Vhate ver be Ll1 5111
e case , '
/ 11/rd lr-rluol J>, o/Jn/ y 53
TRADEMARK S
A traden1ark is a word, fi ure , numeral, design , or a combinati on of a ny or
these, ~1 se d to idenu y and dis ti~guish the goods or se~·vices of a business r;·o m
those m a rk eted by others. In other words , it establishes th e relationship be -
t " ·e en the goods and the manufacturer. A trademark can r elate to boLh
1J rod
1
ucts an d serv ices.]
Nor m L1 ]l y, Lh e goo ds produ ced b y a m anufacturer estctbl is hes <.l repuuLion
O\ ' e r a nu ~ bcr of years a nd a r e r ead il y ide 1nif'tab le bv Lh e tra dem;ir k. th e\
11
pos sess. T hu s ; th e business owne r 's r ep ut at io 11 is ~11 Stetke with t h e ~(H)d:-.
cirrying· Lh e m ar k. On Lhi s basis , th e busin ess l)wncr G lll cl,11111 exdusl\t' r ight ~
' (J
t o Lt SC th a L mark_,. . ,.
-1·· I k. · I 1· ,1 a ·i ·" IJnJLccted both under sLaLu t o r, 1:rn. ,tnd lli1111w) .
11
r;t<c111,n ' s 111 nc. tL '--
·i I ·r·· I C .,11 icl ,Mci·c·li·inc.lisc, ·
Marks
· ·
Ac t, 19--10. \\ ,b 1hc l1r,1 .
' l' l l>I !.1"~
Iti \\. W !cl<.
· I , .k . · I \ ·, ·1·J 1 i s \\',1s r c j) b cc d Li t c r l )\ t h l • l u c. k :w d \ k r -
CJU\Tl' I Jl!1'f 11 ; 1< C lll,ll S Ill 11 ( I d. · c . .
' .. ,..., . k. \ <)~ u ·1·11c· Tr,,cl c \L:i rb .\cl , I q~)~) . "htL·h rcpbn:d Lh c
<. lnnd 1\ 111" \-L11 " , < 1, 1•. >11 . . . .
1
,, • IJ ·, ·t () ! l St' j)( (.' llii )l'J I :>, ~()(} '. L ;UHi l ', ll1 Clll'11 [>1t Jlllt'.
1·\I \c 1 ] CJ ~> S. < ;1111<· 1111, 1 c· .LC , . . . .
' - · ·1·1 c •tt!T Cl11 ]'\! . \c1 ,11\crn·~ l()r t lll' rcg 1~t 1c1u n11 ui
\\11 li1 IH'TRIP~()) 1 1l g;t ll!)ll',. l l . ,
54 1:ntrefrrrm,l,urship
. t d Examination r· . . .
3. Rece1p an b r e tu r ni ng a copy o t 11e ap pl1ca-
. • · . . k 1ow led ge <1 Y · · ·
> .,. . "' . ]) l of l li e appl1Cat1on is c1 c i
I.,u . , , -k A n o ffi cia l number ts g1ven to the
e1 _. )I th e rn,11 . . _ .
lion ;don g with a repres~ 11Lc1 t1~>11 < [ ·1J J li ca tio n ca n beco me v~ry unpo1 tant in
.- . T he d a te ol receipt o '- 11
appl 1ca t io n~ . . _'-' di 11 5 la te r.
IJossib le inlnn ge rnc nt piocee g , d ev idences and searc h es among
. . . I - II docum e nts cU1 d .
T he o ffice co ns1c en a . ·l . th e r egist r ar can respon in the
. . ., I - ·ks. Aft er suc h sea r c 1111 g,
"' ....- 1st m o· t1 etc e m,u
\._ ,, - t)
fo llovv in g ways:
1. Abso lute acce ptan ce . . . th e mark
2. Accepta nce subj ect to modificati o n s in .
3. Re fu sal , I ·h
In case modification s h a ve been as e k d fo r, th e a p p licant must comp y wit
. . th e supu
th e m w1thm • 1ate d p e1-·I od o f th ree m o nths. ,
~ Certification marks, which a re given for co mplia nce w ith defined stan-
- da r ds. T h ese a re not confined to an y r estri cte d n1 embership. Such n1arks
are g ra n te d to a ny e ntity th a t ca n ce rtify th a t its prod u cts meet certain
esta blish e d stan d a r ds. T h e in ter n atio n a lly accep ted 'ISO 9000 ' qualitr
stan d ard a ncJ th e Indi an ISI m a rk a r e e xan1 pl es of w idely recognized cer-
tificat io n ma rks.
• Collective marks can be owne d b y a n y associa ti o n . The e nbers
111 1
such or
an assuciat ion will be all owed Lo use th e collec ti ve n1ar k to iclentit\ thern-
~c l\'(~s a~ m e rnbers of th e association . Exa inples of s u c h associa tions wou ld
IJc tho \e repre sen ti ng au;o u nta nt,s, .engin eer~, or architeus or industry
;.1 ss<1c ic11i ,>11'-> '->t ich ;.J-; C I I. '
l i '> l Ll ] I\ I IJ <' t · I JI j 1 C: 1· · , .. /' . . k f .
. .. . , ' · P_ 0 < ( ss o rcg 1sLrc1 LJ on tc1 -es more Lhan a year a ·re1
i1p pl1< .1 110 11. ,\l1liot 1<•li -i[ 1, , 1. .
1 . · 1· h ('!. · ] - · Ie
.1ppl f(
. __ >-i • '-- u c i pLo t eo 1u a nu mbcro1 anapp1icat1o n,t 1
,1 11( ( ,I l l l <"tj ll C', I ~ti] (' .. \ 1·• '1 ('/ ' I L ' . . . .
· . x p u 1,u n !Ho) exa1n 1nat 1on of th e reg istration
fnt ,,lfec/110/ Pro/Jerly 57
Exhibit 3.1
Benz
Da imler Benz decided
. II M . to
~c e t cedes Benz cars restart ope1·atio , .
th . . . . ns Jn 1n d.ia by tymg .
up with Telco to
B . . , eu p1en11um lu .. . ..
e nz was recognized as a sy b l f xu1 y ca1s. World over Mercedes
exec utives of the coinpan c m 0 d 0 u.pper-clas s sophistication. Wh e n th e top
. b
t h eir rand would be m·Y tocused b their attent'10n on I n d ia,
.
they were sure that
. isuse
expecting to find their t d y some uns crupu lous busmesses .
. Th ey were
r a emarks on aut . .
?ro~ucts. To their utter horror, the . . o par ts or other mechanical
infringem ent of th · _ d Y discovered that the most prominent
eu tra emark was d b .
manufactu red a line of n , d one Y Hypo Hindustan , wh o
underwea r appeared in1 t~n s u~ erwear called Benz. Ads promoting Benz
leading TV channels. B e maJor ne~spaper s and magazines and on the
. d enz underwea1 also made use of the famous three-
p~int~- st ~~- ~f Mercedes by using in1agery of an underwea r clad man
exten. ing is limbs to form a three-poin ted star in a metallic circle.
Daimler Benz took the matter to the courts and the courts immediate ly
ruled in their favour.
applicatio n, together with a declaration stating the reason for the request and a
payment of the fee five times the application fee. ,
' If the Registrar of Trade Marks is satisfied with the reason, the examinatio n
of the applicatio n is expedited and the examinatio n report is issued within
three months of the date of the request. If such a request is rejected after the
hearing, the fee paid is refunded.
The registratio n is valid for ten years and is renewable for subsequen t
consecutiv e periods of ten years. Non-renew al leads to a lapse of registration .
H owever, a lapsed registratio n can be easily restored.
Reciproci ty for the purpose of claiming priority is now allowed from the
ap plications originatin g from the Paris Conventio n countries if filed within six
mo n ths of the date of priority.
The courts in India have recognized the internation al rep utation of fo reign
trade mar ks and trade nan1es and the significanc e of their protection . Marks
such as those of Amway, Whirlpool and Fe rrari have received pro tectio n
through j udicial decisions in India.
Cancellat ion
\J _ re ti o n fur ca n ce ll ation or rectificatio n or registratio n of a trademark
. 1 .1 ppl l 6,1 f-1 ci l)\ -•g·<T1·1·eved parties for example , th ose cla1m111g to be pnor
ca n o n \' c 1 t' 1 . 0
h ,
Exhibit 3.2
Domain Names
T he Unifo n n Don1a in Nan1e Dispu le Reso luti on Po lic y ( L DRP ) \,\' d "i c·· .
- ~ 1rl 1
1is he d by the Inte rn e t Corp oratio n fo r Ass i gneJ '.\f
J-
\Nh e n choos ing a do1na in name , th e regist ranL m U)l. ' r c pr t<.,cn1 ~ni rJ
warra nt', an1on g other things , that regist ering the name ' will not i nfrin~<~UfJ<J ri
or otherw ise violat e the rights of any third party ' . ~rhe reg jstran r. m U \l. ;-,I ,,
1
agree to partic ipate in an arbitr ation proce eding s in case any thi r d pan: rJ\~t n
a clai1n.
In a UDRP proce eding , the panel will consid er factor s such as gi\'en bt lrJ I.\··
(i) Is the defen dant regist rant's doma in name iden tical or con fu singl y ~irni-
lar to a trade mark in which the comp lainan t has rights .
(ii) Does the defen dant have any rights or legitim ate intere sts in the name.
(iii) Did the defen dant regist er the name in bad faith .
The goal of the UDRP was to stream line the proce ss for re solvin g such
dispu tes, makin g it quick er and cheap er than a stand ard le g al challe nge .
Howe ver, a party dissat isfied by the UDRP decisi on may challe nge the decision
in a court of law.
Some intere sting doma in name dispu tes are given below :
A1icr0soft.com: Zero Micro softw are regist ered this doma in name (with a zero in
p lace of the seco nd 'O '). The regist ration was cance lled a fter Mic rusolt
p rotest ed.
vVWFc:om: The doma in n ame wwf.c om is with the World Wrest li n g fe deration.
a profes siona l ·w restlin g organ izatio n , where as wwf.o rg is the website of \ \'orld
WildJj fe Fund .
Peta .org: Curre ntly, this doma in n an1e is wit h the very well-k no,"·n world wiJ e
organ izatio n, Peop le for Eth ica l 1reatn1ent of Anin1 a ls (PE~L\) . \1 u ch
to ihe
disrna y of PE~I1\ , ic)r so rnc time it used to be with a noth er orga ni zation callin g
itself ' Peopl e Eatin g 'E1sty A ni rnals.'
.\fclJm/(/!d\. tom: /\n ,lltlh o r took thi s do1n ain 11a1ne to exp lo re th e value ?f
dcnn~lin 11 ;1 11H-,. He ga\'c ii to i\1cDo nald Cor pora tion in exc han ge fo r cor11m
it-
ri1<:nt , li\, { h;1riL1 hlc clo r1;1 t i ons.
ln! P!lt1clual PrnfJnl_)' 59
u se rs of the m a rk A , - • ~ .
. . · n ap p 11cat10n tor ca nce ll at1011 mu ~, he fil ed with the
Registrar ot Trade Marks or the Appe 11 ate Boarc.1
. .
. 1
f. h e fo. llowmg are some o f tl 1e usua . . .
gro und s on th e IJasi s n l wh ich the
reg1strat1on of a trademark can be removed or cance lled:
1. The applicant did not intend to use the tradem ark in th e norm a l course
or_trade and there has been no bona fide use of the trademark for tb e time:
being up to the d a te three months before the date of the app li cation for
removal.
2 · There has been no bona fide use of the trademark for a con tinuou s period
of five years from the date on which the tr ademark was actually entered
on the register or longer, during which the trade m ark was registered.
3. The trademark was wrongly registered. Before this trademark came in to
being, there was an established trademark that was identical or decep-
tively similar.
Infringement of Trademarks
Registration of a tradema r k is a p~erequisi_tc for in itiatin g an in_fr_i~1g~_mcnt
act1on· . ~fl1e reg1·stered proprietor, his/her heirs a nd u sers_can _. to1 1nh 111ge-
. sue
· of a registered trademark ca n a lso su e fo r mf rmg-L'Jlle11 l. fhe
m e nL A n ass ignee . · . . . . _ . . .· . "
·
-o 11 owing - t'a l conditions mu st ex ist for 1111tJat10 n oi :rn 111111n ge 111 enl
i cssen 1
action:
l. The a ll ege dl y infrin g in g mark must be e ith e r id e11 1ictl or dccepti ,·ely simi -
br to tbc reg isLe rc d lrad e mark . . - -. .
·11 . ds/~e1·vice~ i 11 re la Lion to "d1ich the allcgedl) rn{nng111g r~1 a1k is
c) H. goo · - · · 1· I st => r">cl
, 11s.·t I >c, .SJ)''c·i·fi cJ ll \' cover ed by, the r egis Lra tH)ll o t ie reg1. e c
u,c < 111
I '-- , . c
t1 1dcrn ;1rk.
(tO , · I f:1t l et inl,tp
I li e tl 'l l ' llf'! ll(' ;i llcgn ll y inJ ri11g i11 g m ark ll1U S1 be in ll1L' cour'lt 0 1 tr;id c.
l lH· ll"it ' 11111.-,1 he in such a man ner as LO rencle 1· th e> use lik el y 10 be L<1kc 11 ;1'>
l wi 11g 11 'le d ;1s a trademark.
,\ t l'g i'i lc rC' d Lr,1dc111ark (RTM) is also i11fringed by u se or ;1 mar k \\' hc11
l)t' ( ,I ll'i l' or
• it s icl c nl i1 y wi ll1 RTM and sim ilaril y ,,v ith good s/sen-·ices coYcred by rcgis-
Lrallon;
• iLs sirni l,1rit.y wiLh RTM and id entit y with goods/se rvices covered by regis-
Lra tion; or
• it.s icknLi ty with RTM and id e ntit y wit/1 goo ds/se rvices covered by regis-
tration
i1 is like ly 10 cause contusion on th e pa rl or the publ_i c _(in c~se 3 above,
confusion is presumed), or wh ich is li ke ly Lo ha ve an assooat1on with th e RTM.
Han identical or similar ma rk is used with respect to goods or serv ices th at
are not simi lar to those for which an RTM is registered , such use amounts to
infringeme nt if an RTM h as reputation in Indi a and the use of the mark
without due cause takes unfair ad van Lage of, or is detrim ental to , the distinctive
character or repu te of the RTM.
Under the TM Act, the following acts would also amount to an infringeme nt
of the RTM:
I. Use of the RTM as a trad e nam e or p art of the trade name dealing in sa me
goods or services for which the RTM is registered.
2. Use of the trademark in advertising if such advertising takes unfair ad van-
tage of and is contrary to the honest practice in indu strial or commercial
matters, or is detrimenta l to its distinctive character ; or is against the
reputation of the tracJernark.
Under the TM Act, even verbal use of the mark can constitute infringement.
Passing Off
T he user of an unregistere d trademark is barred from instituting an infringe-
n1 c nt acrion. However, if the ma rk in question has become well known in India,
th e user of' such a trademark is not without recourse and m ay seek a remedy by
me a ns of a passing-off action . The purpose of this tort is to protect co mm ercial
goodwil l ,1nd to c 11su re th;1t the user's business reputation is not exp loited.
Sin ce business goodwi ll is a n ,1sset and, therefore, a species of p roper ty, the l,i_\''.
l
pi ntect"i it agai n.st cnc ro:ichrncnr as such. In a p ass in g-off action, th e plainun j
fnl t LLect11 a/ Pro/Jerly 61
Exhibit 3.3
Rediff vs Radiff
1·
Rc: d if Lc.o m is on e of I h , It,.dc111g .
c l ncl1anwc b ·· t · · I . .
h e;1clqu..-1 rterecl in M I . . s1 cs . I wa.., lo1111d c cl m J 996 and .is
• .. um )a1. It provid es e-m ·1 . .. · . .
f ac dJ! V a nd news It I a 1 , mc~sc1gin g \CfV ICl:", '-ihoppmg
. '' . .
r
· ·•
<:tppeare o n tiie scene p · ·
., d ··t·r . . eople a t red1H .co m ,got worried that
ld i .com m10-ht be tr . l .
v.. •·l O ying to cas 1 m on the brand cre ated by redirf.com .
1 11 sty, users who have typ d 111 · h d .
. d't'f· e t e omarn name wrongly can land up in
l a I .com There was al so a poss1·b·1· 1 1ty th at co n su m ers can get confu sed
· c ,
·
bet,veen , the two si m1·1 a1- sounc1mg .
. names. Very soon, red1ff com filed a suit
against Cyberto oth, the company behind radiff.com .
The defence put up by Cybertoo th was primarily based o n the following
po1n ts:
• The word 'radiff' is made up by taking the first three lette rs of the word
' radical' and the first letters of the words 'inform a tion ', 'future,' a nd
'free.' I ts origins have nothing to do with rediff.com .
• The do1nain name 'radiff.co m' has been registere d wi th NIS, th e official
agency for registeri ng domain names.
• T he two websites are engaged in entirely differe n t businesse s. Rediff.co m
is a portal that offers a variety of services, including e-mail, shopping . and
me ssaging, whereas radiff.co m just provides hyperlin ks to the vvebsites of
its advertis ers .
• T h e web us e r is an aware and sophistic ated individua l and vvill not be
confused by th e a ll eged similarity in th e names .
T he court was no t co n vin ced by the arg um ents put forth by Cy benooth ...md
· . [;-·avour o r·1·ecljfl•corn. C ybertoo th was g i \'en thre e months rn rc1 11m c·
· ru le d m
1t
th e \ ·\I e b si Le .
The trade mark select ed shoul d be distin ctive. Ther e shoul d not be
any scopt
fo r confu sion with existi ng trade mark s. Not only is it bad for busine
ss . it ,~
unlike ly ro be regist ered by the Regis try of Trade 1nark s. Also, the
tradem ark
shoul d be appea ling to the consu mers.
A feVI· select ed Lrade marks shoul d be subm itted at the Regis try of Tracle 1
m, :-.,~
for a paid searc h . Even the unlike liest of trade m arks could hav e been
\'isu.1l ILrc
an d r egiste red by so m eone in the past. This searc h will virtua ll y elimin
,Hc l!h
possib ility of a sin1 ilar trad em a rk h av ing been regis tered earli er.
he rnaclc i 11 ; 111 ;rppn1 p 1i11c ~1d vcr1is i11 g and n1 a rk.c tin g str,Hegy.
4. Prote cting Tradf 'mark
'f ·J 1 1
,,c tt .t< i cr1lc1• J· " •
P~ <>l ee lnJI by reg ul a rl y sc111 nin g 1:he
h . • . LiOil ~
m arke t for 1mita. .
111 11 ;itiern ph ()f p:,~-.,ing ,;[L The mark et bas
to be moni tored by the sales te,iJJ 1
, , lntl'! /1'rl ual Pro jJnt1· 63
l lie Jou rrw/ of· 'Fmd ·/ ·
· . e111m <s h;1s L0 1
1r;1clcmarks de ~ .' · 1
c sc rnn ed Lo er • - . II· .· . . .
> not gtt regtsll'rcd . · ) 'i U H lat sim ila r or 1den1 1cal
COPYR IGHT
Literary Works
- T hese cover published works, including books, articles, j o u rnals, and period i-
cals, as well as manuscripts. Even adaptations, translations and abridgements
a re taken as original works and are protected under copyright law. Very im-
po r ta ntl y, these also cover computer programs and computer databases .
Dramatic Works
A dramatic work is a work capable of being phys ically performed . It need n Ol
be fi xed in writing or otherwise. Son1e examples of dram atic wo rk.s are a pit'Cc
o f re cita tion, choreo gr a phic work , elements o[ a d a nce or balle t, costume'). ,rnd
scene ry associ a Le d vvith a dra m a, etc.
Musical Works
.· .. l . -k me a n s · t wo r k con sistin g or mu sic and it iucltHk~ -2.r.1ph it",tl
,\ n1u s1c1 w oi · ' ·\ · · ]n\ ' 'L' !) lLllt'
. . f. . .}. . k -r~h e \.\' () r cl s in a s() n g cl n ( t 1ll~ 111 LI~ l l • t
I • '
I ) () ! a Ii O I l () \ ll C l d \\ 0 I · ·
1 ig ht-.; ;-u1 d Il i c r ig h1 s ca n nor be m e rged .
Registration of Copyright
Though the Indian Cop yright Act provides for a procedure fo r registration of
cop yright, registration is not necessary for acquiring a copyright. I n fact, it is
not advisable to go through the trouble of registering a copyright. In Indi an
la,"·s, a cop yright is created when the original work is created and unlike laws in
rhe US , registering it does not confer any special rights. Th e particulars with
the Registrar of Copyrights will serve as evidence of existence of the work on
the date of registration. Many creators of original work use oth e r meth ods to
prove existence of their work on a particular date such as depos iting
manuscripts in a bank locker.
Copyright Protection
Ji~ ;::s:~\~~~:.
1
basic concepts central to the idea of copyright protection as
Idea vs Expression
fair Use
·.c ·
In most cases ' the term of copy1.·1g h t 1·s t h e 111et1m e of th e a uth or plu ') 6() vcaPi
. . '
therea fter. There are s ome nota bl e excep tions as given be low:
ca':>L\.
1. Broad castin g organ izatio n has rights with respec t to th eir broad
yec:Jr
The t~rm of this right is 25 years from the begin nin g of the calend ,u
follow ing the year in which the broad cast is mad e.
2. Perfo rmers have some specia l rights in relatio n to their perfo rmanc e .
calen-
These rights are for a period of 50 years from the begin ning of the
dar year follow ing the year of the first perfo rmance.
3. In case of posth umou s public ations , the rights stand for a
period of 60
years after the public ation.
• 1· ~- •
th -· elusiv e right to do . .d 1· . boLl1 ci\'il ·rnd crinun al rcmct Jl' .'i . , 01
. e. e x . . h Act pro v1 es o1 . ..
() ·:i n i11f'rin ot·mc111. the cop~-r1 glH
The Cop yng f t ·of) .)'I' .t g·Ilt.S.. 7
p
1·0 , ·1·11 0-
. d
. .. . I
f' . .
h
.
<
s
"
·incl urdcr !'or ,
s1.. 11u 1-c an
mf nn gc. rn e nls o c . e d y b y way o 111.J u . 11(·t1.(rn
- ,
.. 1 J
O\\.' Ilt.:r is cntl t ec to J~
11
l . I . . ,··1 .. 11
· ·, 1 li1 w 1nrric s 111 ;1 \ :1ls() bl· :1sk.ccl w
. . f'1.. 111 g· cl rt I l (: S. .. 1 ( 0 CI l h '
[. 111
destr u c tion ° ,n g
pav dama ges. . ·e n ~n t Ll1 e impor t of
P' .
( ! Co jJ )' riglll-; l1a s rh cl .jJ O\'\'C I , RegisLrar c, 11 1 enre
to _ ·I . .
1 s 11ps .
r hc Rcgis t r ~1 r > , . . 1
. . £"' ()n ,-cu·1 ,111 g· a comp arnt. t 1c
inlri 11:2,ing <<>P ,.1 ·
' 6G I. JI/; I jlJ 1' 1/ ( Ill ,/11fl
PATENTS
CA pa ten t co nfe rs mo no po l y rig hts on the inv e nto r for a lim ite d pe rio
T h ese rig hts a re s up po sed to d of time .
act as inc ent ive s fo r pro mo ti ng
nev v pro du cts. In Ind i a dev elo pm ent of
, pa ten ts are go ve rne d by th
e Pa te n ts Act, 1970, but
the re h ave bee n a nu mb er of
sub seq u e nt am e nd m e nts. Be ing
TR I PS a g ree m e nt , Ind i a is un a pa rty to tht'
de r an ob lig a tio n to kee p its
confc>rlll it y with th e TR I PS p p ate nt l,rn ·s in
r ov isio ns >
The invention mu st be c . bl ·f · d . . . .
. . apa e o 111 ustnal ap_p l1 cat1on , which can alsCJ nK ,ir1
t l1a t t11.e 1nvent1on should h
, ave t l1e potential
. to be of be nefit Lo someone.
Inventive Step
I~ventive ste~ , also called non-obviousness, asks whether an inve ntion is a <,ig-
rnficant technical advancement. A pate nt may not be awarded if th e difference
between the new invention and the existing alternatives is substanti al.
The Indian Patent Act lists all innovations th at are not classi fi ed a~
inventions, within the provisions of this act, and, thus , a re not patentable . Some
of these innovations are listed below :
• Inventions that are frivolous or contrary to established natural laws .
• Inventions, whose primary uses are contrary to morality or can cause
harm to humans or the environment.
• The n1.ere discovery of a scientific principle without manifesting it in a product.
• Discovery of a new use of an existing substance .
• A new method of agriculture.
• A business method. _ .
· ocess· Process patents were available Gue lnd1a ll,1~
• A manu f:actunng pr · . . . .. . . . . . .
·t a te nt regune to comp ly wit h its 111t e1 11at1on,tl co111-
n1oved on to pro d uc P( · ·
. . · 1 bu siness processes can be pat e nted tn the LS .
m1tments . Inte1 es trn g y, .
1. Filing Application i:-. (ilcd . .I J) ( ,l:-il' 1 liL' l ' L' ,Ul' ~()111C
. ·red <>I t lh c· cL.1, it
. · l l'i J11J1JJ 1JC . . l ' tHI , :, 1)rL"IJll1 111.t 1,
r he Jj>j) l 1G\(l <)l . I . ar)r)li c;i rinn . 1lic p , J( t' 111 11 lf I l l :>
1J1 l ll
c1 l n in 11, (' )TOI ~
Exhibit 3.4
Process for Registering a Pa ten t
FIL IN G OF TH E
AP PLICATIO N On th e d ate the app lica lio n is lilt: d,
it i~ 11unilH ' H·d .
•
PU B LICAT IO N
OF TH E
Th e app lica tio n is pub li:b eci in the
is ope n to pub lic afte r e1g h te e n m_o
filing of app lica tion or th e d ~te o l
Offici,tl CMc-tt< itri<i
n~h .i, _from_the d:-it,, rl
pno n~ y o_f tJH·
AP PLICATI ON app lica tio n wh ich eve r is ear h_er. An
app1Jcat1~m ftJt
ear lier pu bli cat ion cou ld be ble<l by
the app lica nt .
1. .
2. Publication of the A
PP 1cat10n
xamin atton .
3. First Examina tion Report
T he exa1niner of pate t · fi . .
. n s iss ues a 1rst examrnau on repon , whi c. h ( fJrtl:-.ii n'-1
views
. . on any opposit1·on filI e d t·11
1 d ate. Tl11s
· repon may ra1<ie · a va r ·,et ,. d
objections a nd the applicant has up to six month s to rep ly to Lh e~c <J bj<.:ction -,.
4. Gran t
Patent rights are granted if the applicant complies with all the ol~jection s raised
within six months. Otherwise, the application is de e med to h a, t: hten
abandoned.
5. Post-grant Opposition
Any interested person may file an oppositio n on tenable ground s, wi Lhin ont:
year of the date of publication of gr ant of a patent. :
I ndians cannot file for patents abroad unless any of th e fo llo\,·ing conclirion ~
are m et:
1. \Vritten perm1ss10n · · to do so has been obtained from th e C:orni-olier cJi
Paten ts. . .
c h sa me in vention h as been filed 1n Indi a a L k,l 'l L .;,i~ \ \ t' t k,
2. A patent 1or t e
Jrior to .fi ling it abroad. . . .
l . 1- - tenL use d to be 1-4 ,-car~; n o \, , ll h urnlt irrnh
U. nu·1 r.ecen tl)', the te1
· .
m o ,l pa
Jj
' .
. ! _15 Th<..'. Lt!Til for:, p arcm <.11111, )[ '' l '
for a term of 20 years for a P' oc. uc . .
, circum stan ces.
extended un cl er an)
1
. . l , .· ,J t of r l1 c IJ ~l l l ,11 ll11l<k1 t .1 11 u t·
. . - . . ·s the a bso u1 c , ig l ~ . I
In som e un um str.111cc, . . .· J !' th e p a te111 cd ir1, t · 11f1tJ11 1.111 he i 1.. , 11 1 ft<
. , - I > l a nd c.onipu lsory li ce 11 u1 1g o . .. .
s u.'-ipc r~c <:<. , . Ilic fo llowin g- cirru111..,u11u , . .
t.o. T hi s cc111 !Jc don e i11 . . l . . . I i n tl1l· J>. t tl· 111l'll !ll\l"I l·
. . . I '.-) () f' I h (' p I ti )I t' \ \ I I 1 I ( .., p (. l
J
l. Rc (1son;i!Jlc (( ' (jllJJ C' J JJ{.Jl r·· I
.
(JOl 1
Ii '·,\'c n () I I >("'-' ll ..; ·111,
'
. .
JC ( ·
I
. · i!ilJlclOll t'jJl i ) ll , 1 '
I 1· · t 1 1 l' 1, () 1i.t· IJ I, ·,!l
•
o rd -
· > ·1 1wp;1( c 11<< I
. ! · JJ\ ' ( ' I1ll(>ll J<; ll< JI ,l\, 1 '
1
l .
Licencing of Patents
In case you do not have the finan cial stren gth or the orga
niza tio nal re ach to do
justi ce to your own inve ntion , it is a good idea to licen
ce it to ano ther com pan y.
How ever , an assig nme nt of a pate nt or of a shar e in a
pate nt is valid only if the
follo wing cond ition s are satis fied:
1. The re is a writ ten agre eme nt betw een the parti es cont
ainin g all th e agreed
term s a nd cond ition s.
2. An a pplic ation for the regis trati on of such an agre eme
n t is filed with the
Con troll er of Pate nts with in six n1on ths of the exec
utio n o f th e agree -
men t.
Sjmi larly , it may be poss ible to obta in pate nt right s from
a n inve nro r who is
con st rain e d by the lack of reso urce s. Such an agre
eme n t be tw ee n nr o pJni es
mu st in clu d e rrov i sio n s pert ainin g to the follo wing
facts:
1. ·f he te r m o f the agre e m ent
2. T h e tc rrito ri ;.tl excl us ivity of th e r ights
9
~). I·111,rn
.. u·c1I tc rt w, 1nclt1
· · g paym ents u f· I'1xe cI a ..J
d 1n nu \ ' clrl· ,1 lJ Ie arno un
· · ts ro
· th e
p:i tc n t hol clc r
l. ~pcc il ic;1tio 11 o l" pro d t1r1io11 ca p aciti es tu be set up
and m a rke tjn g bud get
I() lw cn rnmi lt c rl
l11tellnt110 / Pro/Jnl_y 71
DESIGNS
I n India , desig n s are prote cted unde r the Desi gn Act, 2000
. The term dt.'::1
bas been defin ed as 'the featu res of shap e, conf igura tion, p atter
n, orna111l'n i.
or comp ositio n of lines or co lours app li e d to any a rticle '. The articl
e c.ui be in
boL b t\-\'o- dime nsion al a nd three -dim e nsion a l form s. In o rd er
to be rcgi:i tt•rt'J
undt r the-· Act , u-., des1·gn h 'ls t) t. ·[ l f' 11 · · ·
o , < sa 1s y t 1e o owin g criter ia:
Exhibit 3.5
. Copycat
l k ."1g11ci SuneeL V -
a1 m a \Vas upset a bo l .
ki d be e n r e plicated b . Ak· N . . ut Li e fact ll1 at one ()f Ii ," I-a ll ~() ():') outfi1 s
y n i i a1 u la anotl . II k
,vJs wo rn by actress Ra11 1· 1M kl .. '_ 1e1 '"e - n rn vn d c.,siµ,1H: r I lie- cJ 11tfi t
• , . •. c u 1e rJl Ior th ~ B
Yas h Ra] F1Jms . Rani
J • •