Self-Assessment

Topic: Gender Inequality School: Pawar Public School

Group leader Rohith Pulikonda

Editor Ananya Sinha

Videographer Arnav Deshmukh

Photographer Rishabh Dasgupta

Compiler Avika Sharma

Checklist Max Criteria Done Students Teacher

score score

Y/N

Attractive 5p Is the information well-readable and clearly presented? Y

layout
 Have you divided the long article into five main parts? Y
Part one. Introduction/ Part two Research / Part three
Action time. Part four. Communication / Part five
Comparison/Reflection
 All documents should be visible in your article. The 5p 5p
international jury will not download Word files, PDF
files or PPT files and will not view your YouTube Y
videos that are not embedded in your article.

Have multiple features of the Weebly website been used

such as scribd (to embed wordfiles and PDF files), Gallery
(to add slides of PPT), pictures, feature to embed YouTube
videos, columns; etc? See http://euminddemo.weebly.com

Part one: 5p Did the group provide a short and attractive written or Y
Group video introduction.
introduction
 Add a group photo/camera shot (NO individual
pictures- privacy) Y
 Share some personal info concerning hobbies,
Y 5p 5p
ambitions, etc. of each member (NO last names, no
email addresses, no mobile numbers/ nothing you
would not want to be posted).

Put Eumind in your video title if you post it to YouTube

(make sure you choose unlisted on YouTube, NOT public
or private).

Part two 20p The facts. Y

Research Explanation of choice. Give evidence and mention sources
Facts To what extent does this injustice/abuse demonstrate a 20p 20p
violation of the human rights. Which human rights are
violated? Why are you so angry about this social wrong?
Part two 20 Have you conducted two interviews? Y
Research Have you prepared the interviews well (appropriate
Interviews questions)

1
 1. A victim of the injustice/abuse (if possible) or somebody Y
else with a clear opinion
2. An expert (academic, civil servant, volunteer NGO etc..) Y 20p 18p

Part two: 5p Has the research been documented by pictures/videos?

The fact. You may add a few pictures from the internet
Research. Research. Ask permission to add a picture of the two Y 5p 5p
Pictures, people interviewed.
videos Creative way to draw attention – action time. Photograph
any activity.
Part two 10p Creative way to draw attention. 10p 10p
Is it effective? Does it look good?
Part two Bonus Action-time. Y 10p 10p
max.10p Was action taken? Describe the action (when, target group,
activity
Part three: 10p How did you stay in touch? Please give evidence
Evidence of Have you added pictures of Zoom sessions, Skype calls and
communication screenshots of WhatsApp messages Y 6p 10p
Videoconferences.
How did you prepare the videoconferences? What did you
learn from the videoconferences? Wheat went well?
Part three: Bonus
Any evidence of closer collaboration with peers?
Evidence of max.10p
closer N 10p 10p
communication

Part four: 10p

Comparison
Y 10p 10p
Compare your outcomes with the research results of your
counterparts?
What have you learned about the social wrong in the
country of the counterparts (what is similar, what is
different). Draw a conclusion

Part four: 10p Each student of the group has to write his/her own
Reflection reflection (minim. 100 words)
What went well? What would you do differently? Methods, Y 10p 10p
group work, technical aspects etc.
Total 115 111 113

If there was a problem with the comparative aspect, please

explain it here. ----
The group will then be assessed on a total of 90 points.
If there was no possibility to work together with peers in a
subcluster, please explain it here. ----
The group will be assessed on a total of 90 points
Do you have any suggestions for a project for Eumind
for next year? Should have some interesting topics so that we can easily research upon it
and it will be fun to do the project. Dutch students should take up the work
Please explain your idea and some tasks the students on a serious note.
would have to carry out concisely.