Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Employer’s Representative:
23.11.2015
ERC AKH Railway Project
Project:
Employer:
Employer’s Representative:
Contractor:
www.ym.com.tr
Designer:
Report Name:
TYPICAL WATER TANK (TYPE 1) STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT
Report No:
AKH - YM I - DD - WT 0 0 X - D - C E - R E P - 1 0 0 1 - 1
Project Organization Stage Location Category Discipline Type of Number Vers.
Document
Date: 23.11.2015
TYPICAL WATER TANK
(TYPE 1) STRUCTURAL AKH – YMI – DD – WT00X – D– CE – REP – 1001 – 1 23.11.2015
DESIGN REPORT
This report must not be either loaned, copied or otherwise reproduced in whole or in part or used for any
purpose without the prior written permission of Yapı Merkezi. © Yapi Merkezi Insaat ve Sanayi A.Ş.,2015 Page: 2 / 63
ERC AKH Railway Project
VERSION HISTORY
PREPARED BY
YM Senior Structural
Checked by E. Günal
Design Engineer
YM General Structural
Approved by Ö. Güzel
Design Manager
APPROVAL
APPROVED BY
2 LOADS ..................................................................................................................................... 11
3 MATERIALS ............................................................................................................................. 24
5 CALCULATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 26
1.3 References
Standards and references to be used in the design are the followings;
EN 1992-1-1:2004 - Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and
rules for buildings
Foundation:
30cm levelling concrete : 7.2 kN/m2 & 10cm levelling concrete : 2.4 kN/m2
Roof Slab :
Isolation + (6cm Gravel+12cm levelling concrete) = (1.5 kN/m2) + ( 2.9 kN/m2) = 4.4 kN/m2
As it is seen from the table above; Awash, Shewarobit and Kombolcha Stations are
resting over fill and Hayk Station is resting over natural soil. In the geotechnical reports of
Shewarobit and Kombolcha Stations the following soil parameters are recommended for
buildings which are resting over fill & natural soil:
In order to be on the safe side following parameters are selected for the design of a typical
Water Tank TypeI:
The soil parameters shall be justified for Awash and Hayk Stations after the execution of
necessary geotechnical investigations for these stations. In the case of soil parameters for
Awash or Hayk Station would be worse than the values which are taken in the calculations, the
structural analysis shall be carried for the Station which needs to be verified with these soil
parameters. In the design of Water Tank (TypeI) which are resting over compacted fill, "Soil Type
C" is considered in the seismic design of these buildings in a conservative approach.
SEISMIC PARAMETERS
Please refer to “Basic Design Report No: AWRYMXBTRGNRL00100, Section 3.6
Seismicity, pages 1214” for the Seicmicity.
The following Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) values are considered along the project:
PGA : 0.20g in the vicinity of KareKore (up to 25km north and down to 25km south),
PGA : 0.16g at the other places.
Water Tank TypeI structures are only located at four places (Awash, Shewarobit,
Kombolcha, Hayk Stations) which are not within the 25km vicinity of KareKore. The peak ground
acceleration value is taken as 0.20g instead of 0.16g to be on the safe side.
Unit weight of soil is assumed to be 19kN/m3 with an internal friction angle of 30 degrees and
loaded linearly to circumference. K0 is taken as 0.5 by assuming the fill material has an angle of friction
of 30 degree.Depending on geotechnical reports to be provided for each station, assumptions are going
to be checked and the model shall be updated whenever unfavorable results are obtained then the
assumptions made.
At rest soil loads are defined as linearly increasing triangular distribution as a function of depth:
𝑃(𝑧) = z. γ. K0
γ : 19 kN/m3
K0 : 0.5
Dynamic behaviour of soil carried by the circumference of the structure is represented as rigid
retaining wall carrying soil and calculated depending on “EN.1998.5.2004 Annex E : Simplified analysis
for retaining structures”.
Pd = α . S. γ . H2 ( Equation E.19 )
Pd : Horizontal dynamic impulsive force by the soil under earthquake conditions to be applied
at the mid height of the retaining structure.
Pd is calculated as 29.5kN/m (per meter is along the transversal direction of EQ) and applied
at the mid height of circumference walls as equivalent area load per meter square for two axis in two
different case.
𝑃𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 = 𝐾0 . 𝑞𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒
During at rest conditions; four different cases are analysed by using linearly increasing
water pressure. Two cases are set for the two possibility of checkerboard loading, one case
is set for the permeability test of the structure after the construction ,and lastly; one accidental
case, overflow case, is investigated. At rest water pressures are defined as linearly increasing
triangular distribution as a function of water depth:
𝑃𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 = z. γ
Where;
γ : 10 kN/m3
During earthquake; impulsive and sloshing effect of water stored are represented in four
different load cases for two main axis.
The case only when the raw water volume of the tank is full and the treated water side is empty.
(PW2) = 4 x 10 = 40 kN/m2
The case only when the treated water volume of the tank is full and the raw water side is
empty.
The accidental case when the discharge parts of the tank are not working and the water inside
the tank is full up to the bottom level of the entrance door.
This case includes both permeability test time just after the construction is completed and the
operational case when the water levels are expected as the mechanical requirements. This is the sum
of the values given in the both checkerboard cases.
This case represents the sloshing effect of stored water under earthquake conditions. The cases
are set for two different axis and calculated depending on en.1998.4.2004 Annex A (A.4 Rectangular
Tanks).
Se calculations
n : 1 (EC 8.1 Equ 3.6)
T : 2,6 s (EC 8.4 Equ A.46)
TB : 0,15 s (EC 8.1 Table 3.2)
TC : 0,50 s (EC 8.1 Table 3.2)
TD : 2,00 s (EC 8.1 Table 3.2)
S : 1,15 (EC 8.1 Table 3.2)
a0 : 0,2 s
q : 1 (EC 8.4 2.4)
I : 1 (EC 8.1 Table 4.3)
2
Se : 0,83 m/s (EC 8.1 Equ 3.5)
This case represents the impulsive effect of stored water under earthquake conditions. The
cases are set for two different axis and calculated depending on en.1998.4.2004 Annex A (A.4
Rectangular Tanks).
for L=2,35m
z (m) z/h q0(z)/q0(0) q0(z) Fi (kN/m) simplified linearly as
4,7 1,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
4,0 0,85 0,70 0,74 9,77 14,00
3,0 0,64 0,90 0,95 12,56
2,0 0,43 0,92 0,97 12,84
1,0 0,21 0,95 1,00 13,26
0,0 0,00 1,00 1,05 13,95 14,00
for L=6,2m
z (m) z/h q0(z)/q0(0) q0(z) Fi (kN/m) simplified linearly as
Input values chosen in order to use response spectrum function are represented in the following
window.
Explanations of abbrevations:
D : Dead load
Q : Live load
H : Soil load
W1 : Raw water
W2 : Treated water side
Wc : Sloshing effect of water during earthquake
Wi : Impulsive effect of water during earthquake
Wa : Overflow case of water
Heq : Dynamic effect of soil during earthquake
Hq : Surcharge load
3 MATERIALS
Concrete used during the calculations is assumed to have a cylinder strength of 25 MPa and should
satisfy the requirements of EN.1992.1.1.2004 Chapter 3.1.
Reinforcement Steel to be used in the construction is B500B Steel class and should satisfy the
requirements of chapter 3.2. and annex C of EN.1992.1.1.2004 and also Chapter 5.2.1 of
EN.1998.2.2005.
Reinforcement areas required for slabs and shear walls are calculated depending on the most critical
design moments taken as results of the model. Torsional effects are taken into consideration and added
to both M11 & M22 moments at the critical design sections while choosing the desing moment. Then;
flexural calculations are made in order to find the required area of reinforcement steel for each section.
The distance between the bottom elevation of the roof slab and the operational water level is 200cm.
Wave height during an earthquake can’t overcome such a height, therefore; freeboard requirements are
assumed to be satisfied.
Sufficient water isolation will be provided for both inside and outside of the tank. Therefore; the
concrete sections are assumed to be dry in any condition and crack control is checked under these
conditions according to EN.1992.1.1.2004 section 7.3.
____________________________________________________________________________
M_d = 50 kN.m / m
M_d = 65 kN.m / m
M_d = 30 kN.m / m
M_d = 30 kN.m / m
M_d = 65 kN.m / m
M_d = 10 kN.m / m
V_cr = 85 kN.m / m
Soil bearing capacity checks are done for Earthquake and Ultimite Limit States by considering
the Design Approach 2. Since the efforts are much less than the resistances the efforts for earthquake
and ULS combinations are compared with resistances obtained according to Design Approach 2 only.
Location Direction M22 M11 M12 Mdesign MR Main Reinf Add Reinf
kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m # dia (mm) # dia (mm)
Slab (+1.60)
Bottom x 7 1 8 17,10 5 10
Bottom y 10 1 11 17,10 5 10
Top x 12 1 13 17,10 5 10
Top y 16 1 17 17,10 5 10
Calculations on the following page are the typical flexural calculations showing typical moment
resistance of the cross section against reinforcements provided.
M_d = 7 kN.m / m
M_d = 16 kN.m / m
M_d = 10 kN.m / m
M_d = 12 kN.m / m
M_d = 10 kN.m / m
M_d = 23 kN.m / m
M_d = 12 kN.m / m
Location Direction M11 M22 M12 Mdesign Mult_typ Check Main Reinf Add Reinf
kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m kN.m # dia (mm) # dia (mm)
W1-W6-W4
Vertical inner 10 18 28 43,30 SAFE 5 12
Vertical outer 47 7 54 57,96 SAFE 5 14
Horizontal outer 48&23 3 51&26 57,96&43,30 SAFE 5 14 & 12
Horizontal inner 30 10 40 43,30 SAFE 5 12
Horizontal (add) inner 65 10 75 79,65 SAFE 5 12 5 10
W2-W5
Vertical inner 27 3 30 43,30 SAFE 5 12
Vertical outer 32 3 35 43,30 SAFE 5 12
Horizontal inner 20 3 23 43,30 SAFE 5 12
Horizontal outer 18 3 21 43,30 SAFE 5 12
W3
Vertical inner 18 3 21 43,30 SAFE 5 12
Vertical outer 32 3 35 43,30 SAFE 5 12
Horizontal inner 23 3 26 43,30 SAFE 5 12
Horizontal outer 25 3 28 43,30 SAFE 5 12
M_d = 23 kN.m / m
M_d = 48 kN.m / m
M_d = 65 kN.m / m
M_d = 30 kN.m / m
M_d = 30 kN.m / m
M_d = 47 kN.m / m
M_d = 10 kN.m / m
V_d = 90 kN.m / m
V_d = 10 kN.m / m
M_d = 90 kN.m / m
M_d = 20 kN.m / m
M_d = 18 kN.m / m
M_d = 3 kN.m / m
M_d = 32 kN.m / m
M_d = 27 kN.m / m
M_d = 23 kN.m / m
M_d = 25 kN.m / m
M_d = 32 kN.m / m
M_d = 18 kN.m / m
Sufficient water isolation will be provided for both inside and outside of the tank. Therefore; the
concrete sections are assumed to be dry in any condition and crack control is checked under these
conditions according to EN.1992.1.1.2004 section 7.3.3. The crack width is taken as 0.4mm as
suggested in Table 7.1N.
SLS combination of the structural modal is 1.0D+1.0H+1.0W+1.0Q and the moment results
are the followings.