Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Download textbook Industrial Mathematics And Complex Systems Emerging Mathematical Models Methods And Algorithms 1St Edition Pammy Manchanda ebook all chapter pdf
Download textbook Industrial Mathematics And Complex Systems Emerging Mathematical Models Methods And Algorithms 1St Edition Pammy Manchanda ebook all chapter pdf
https://textbookfull.com/product/optimization-of-complex-systems-
theory-models-algorithms-and-applications-hoai-an-le-thi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/error-correction-coding-
mathematical-methods-and-algorithms-2nd-edition-todd-k-moon/
https://textbookfull.com/product/reliability-models-of-complex-
systems-for-robots-and-automation-1st-edition-hamed-
fazlollahtabar/
https://textbookfull.com/product/complex-dynamical-systems-in-
education-concepts-methods-and-applications-1st-edition-matthijs-
koopmans/
The mathematics companion mathematical methods for
physicists and engineers Second Edition Fischer-Cripps
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-mathematics-companion-
mathematical-methods-for-physicists-and-engineers-second-edition-
fischer-cripps/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematical-methods-in-
engineering-and-applied-sciences-mathematics-and-its-
applications-1st-edition-hemen-dutta-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/dynamic-modeling-of-complex-
industrial-processes-data-driven-methods-and-application-
research-1st-edition-chao-shang-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/emerging-security-algorithms-
and-techniques-ahmad/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nonlinear-systems-
vol-1-mathematical-theory-and-computational-methods-victoriano-
carmona/
Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Pammy Manchanda
René Lozi
Abul Hasan Siddiqi Editors
Industrial
Mathematics and
Complex Systems
Emerging Mathematical Models,
Methods and Algorithms
Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Editor-in-chief
Abul Hasan Siddiqi, Greater Noida, India
The Industrial and Applied Mathematics series publishes high-quality research-level
monographs, lecture notes and contributed volumes focusing on areas where
mathematics is used in a fundamental way, such as industrial mathematics,
bio-mathematics, financial mathematics, applied statistics, operations research and
computer science.
Industrial Mathematics
and Complex Systems
Emerging Mathematical Models, Methods
and Algorithms
123
Editors
Pammy Manchanda Abul Hasan Siddiqi
Department of Mathematics School of Basic Sciences and Research
Guru Nanak Dev University Sharda University
Amritsar, Punjab Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh
India India
René Lozi
CNRS, Dieudonné Center of Mathematics
University Côte d’Azur
Nice
France
The present volume is based on the selected invited and contributory talks during
the international conference held at Sharda University, Greater Noida, India, during
January 29–31, 2016, on the occasion of the Silver Jubilee of the Indian Society
of Industrial and Applied Mathematics. The conference was inaugurated by
Mr. Rajnath Singh, the Minister for Home Affairs, Government of India. Professor
U.P. Singh, former Vice-Chancellor of Purvanchal University, and former President
of the Indian Mathematical Society, chaired the inaugural session. Professor KR.
Sreenivasan, former Director of Abdus Salam ICTP, Trieste, Italy (UNESCO
organization), and currently a senior functionary of New York University, was the
guest of honor who delivered the keynote address. There were 20 invited speakers
and more than 300 participants from different parts of India and abroad. A good
number of participants presented their research work as contributory talks. Abdus
Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) and International
Mathematical Union (IMU) provided financial support for the participants from
Malaysia, Turkey, and Uzbekistan. Several functionaries of the International
Council for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and eminent industrial
and applied mathematicians such as Prof. Barbara Lee Keyfitz (immediate past
President of ICIAM), Prof. Maria J. Esteban (President, ICIAM), Prof. Alistair Fitt
(Vice-Chancellor, Oxford Brooke University, and former secretary, ICIAM), Prof.
Leon O. Chua (University of Berkeley), Prof. Guenter Leugering (Vice-President,
International Affairs, Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen-Nurenberg,
Germany), and Prof. Maria Skopina (Euler Institute of Mathematical Sciences,
Saint Petersburg State University, Russia) participated and delivered lectures. Three
well-known Indian centers of applied and industrial mathematics: Tata Institute of
Fundamental Research—Centre For Applicable Mathematics (TIFR CAM),
Bengaluru; Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru; and Indian Institute of
Technology (IIT) Bombay, were represented by Prof. G.D.V. Gowda, Prof.
A. Adimurthi, Prof. Mythly Ramaswamy, Dr. Venkateswaran P. Krishnan, Prof.
G. Rangarajan, and Prof. A.K. Pani.
The Silver Jubilee Committee of ISIAM honored Prof. Gowda, Prof. Pani, and
Prof. Rangarajan for their valuable contributions in the field of industrial and
v
vi Preface
classification. In Chap. 12, V. Gowda discusses his recent results in the domain of
finite volume method for nonlinear system of hyperbolic conservation laws arising
in oil reservoir simulation. In Chap. 13, Meenakshi and P. Manchanda study certain
properties of Haar–Vilenkin wavelets for solving differential equations. It may be
mentioned that Haar–Vilenkin wavelet was introduced by them along with A.H.
Siddiqi in 2008. In Chap. 14, Rohit Khokher and Ram Chandra Singh study
footprint-based personal recognition using the dactyloscopy technique.
In Chap.15, M. Dilshad, A.H. Siddiqi, Rais Ahmad, and Faizan A. Khan present
their latest results on a class of variational inequalities. In Chap. 16, Sudip
Chakraborty, Sonia Chowdhury, Joydeep Pal, and Priti Kumar Roy discuss the
impact of vaccination to control HPV dynamics.
In Chap. 17, Chhavi Mangla, Harsh Bhasin, Musheer Ahmad, and Moin Uddin
present their work on the innovative solution of nonlinear equations using genetic
algorithm. Rakesh Kumar and Bhupender Kumar Som describe their results on an
M/M/c/N feedback queuing model with reverse balking and reneging in Chap. 18.
In Chap. 19, U.M. Pirzada and D.C. Vakaskar study solution of fuzzy heat equation
under fuzzified thermal diffusivity. Saureesh Das and Rashmi Bhardwaj present
their work on chaos in nanofluidic convection of CuO nanofluid in Chap. 20.
Bhanumati Panda, Anumeha Dube, and Sushil Kumar study the dynamics of the
seasonal variability of plankton and forage fish in Chilika Lagoon using npzf model
in Chap. 21. Chapter 22 by Fahad Al Basir, Sushil Kumar, and Priti Kumar Roy
deals with the effect of glycerol kinetics and mass transfer during enzymatic bio-
diesel production from Jatropha oil.
Chapter 23 by Jahangir Chowdhury, Sourav Rana, Sabyasachi Bhattacharya, and
Priti Kumar Roy is devoted to the work “role of bio-pest control on theta logistic
populations: a case study on Jatropha curcus cultivation system.” In Chap. 24,
Sudipa Chauhan, Sumit Kaur Bhatia, and Nidhi Purohit present their work on the
dynamics of SIRS model with single time delay.
All invited and contributory talks could not find a place in this volume due to one
reason or the other. Therefore, a summary of some of the presented talks, compiled by
Pooja, is presented in Chapter 25. Chapter 25 contains a summary of some of the
invited and contributory talks by L.O. Chua, G. Pfander, G. Rangarajan,
A. Adimurthi, G. Fairweather, Venky Krishnan, Samares Pal, L.M. Saha, Vikram,
Pooja, Mamta Rani, Abdullah, Renu Chugh and Mandeep Kumari, M.K. Ahmad and
Santosh Kumar, Deepti Gupta, Puneet Kaur, Mazibar Rahman, Javed Miya and
M.A. Ansari, A.K. Sahoo and G.S. Mishra, Shelly Arora and Amandeep Kaur,
S. Prabhakaran and L. Jones T. Doss, Vivek Kumar and Bhola Ishwar, Noor e Zahra,
Ruchira Aneja and A.H. Siddiqi, Mijanur Rehman, Nitendra and Khursheed, Nagma
Irfan and A.H. Siddiqi.
Editors and organizers gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National
Board for Higher Mathematics (NBHM), Department of Science and Technology,
New Delhi; Abdus Salam International Centre of Theoretical Physics (ICTP),
Trieste, Italy; International Mathematics Union (IMU), Berlin, Germany; Indian
National Science Academy (INSA); and Duty Society, Aligarh Muslim University
(AMU). The organizing committee and editors also express their gratitude to the
Chancellor of Sharda University, Mr. P.K. Gupta, for generous support without
which the conference could not have been organized at this large scale. We also
take this opportunity to thank Dr. Thomas Hempfling of Springer Basel,
Switzerland, who spared his valuable time to grace the inaugural function.
Cooperation of Mr. Shamim Ahmad of Springer India is highly appreciated.
Pammy Manchanda
René Lozi
Abul Hasan Siddiqi
ix
Contents
xi
xii Contents
xv
Chapter 1
Linear and Nonlinear Waves
in Gas Dynamics
∂u ∂u
+a =0 (1.1)
∂t ∂x
has the general solution
u(x, t) = f (x − at),
d
∂u
Aj +b = 0,
0
∂x j
where now the coefficients A j are n × n matrices, and the state variable u and lower
order term b are n-vectors. The principal symbol is now a matrix, L 0 = d0 A j ξ j , and
the characteristic
normals are the solutions ν=(ξ0 , . . . , ξd ) of the determinantal equa-
tion det( A j ξ j ) = 0. Now the surfaces in Rd+1 = {(x0 , . . . , xd )} whose normals
are characteristic are the characteristic surfaces. From here the story plays out differ-
ently depending on whether the matrices A j are constant, depend on x (A j = A j (x),
giving a linear system) or depend on x and u (A j = A j (x, u), a quasilinear system).
In the case of a quasilinear or a fully nonlinear system, the characteristic normals are
defined with respect to linearization of the equation around a state u0 .
The theory of partial differential equations began with the Cauchy–Kovalevsky
theorem, see [20] for example, which proved the existence of a unique analytic solu-
tion locally for any system, provided that the system was defined entirely by analytic
functions, and that analytic data were given on an analytic, noncharacteristic surface.
Characteristics appear again in the classification of partial differential equations by
1 Linear and Nonlinear Waves in Gas Dynamics 3
type. A system is said to be elliptic if there are no real characteristics, and hyper-
bolic if it has a maximal set of real characteristics (in a sense that we will explain).
Clearly, these two categories are not exhaustive. In addition, while characteristics
and their detailed properties play an important—practically a defining—role in the
theory of quasilinear hyperbolic partial differential equations (conservation laws),
that is a reflection of the dominant physical phenomenon—wave motion—modeled
by conservation laws. For many applications, including processes in which reaction,
diffusion, or dispersion plays the decisive role, an analysis that focuses on charac-
teristics misses the point.
We turn our attention now to hyperbolic systems. For completeness, we note
that much classical theory of hyperbolic equations treats second- (or higher-)order
equations rather than first-order systems. The two approaches can be unified, see
[39]; we will not attempt to do so here, but we will draw on familiar examples of
second-order equations for reference.
The notion of a “maximal set of characteristics” is not well defined without the
identification of a distinguished variable. For example, the characteristic equation of
the two-dimensional wave equation, u tt = c2 (u x x + u yy ), is τ 2 = c2 (ξ 2 + η2 ). The
roots of this equation are always real if we are solving the equation for τ but not
if we are solving for ξ or η. In examples that come from a physical problem, it is
usually (though not always) clear which variable should be distinguished as timelike.
We will now assume that has been done, and will rename the first variable, x0 , as t.
Then the quasilinear system of n equations,
∂u
d
∂u
A0 + Aj +b = 0,
∂t 1
∂x j
has, for all ξ = (ξ1 , . . . , ξd ), n real roots, τi (x, t, u; ξ ), the characteristic normals.
A system is said to be symmetrizable hyperbolic if it can be put in this form with
A0 symmetric and positive definite, and the remaining A j symmetric for all j. It is
an important, now classic, result that the Cauchy problem for linear symmetrizable
hyperbolic systems is well-posed in the Sobolev space H s , see [24, 44] for example.
1.1.1 An Example
To fix ideas, consider the linear wave equation in two space dimensions, u tt =
c2 (u x x + u yy ). We can write it as a system, defining
u 1 = u y , u 2 = u t − cu x .
4 B.L. Keyfitz
1 u 0 (ξ, η)
u(t, x, y) = dξ dη ≡ K W ∗ u 0 ,
4π c B c2 t 2 − (x − ξ )2 − (y − η)2
Now we get to the point: The analysis of quasilinear hyperbolic systems is faced
with what appear to be incompatible restrictions. On the one hand, the linear the-
ory of hyperbolic systems extends to local (meaning for a limited time) existence for
quasilinear symmetrizable hyperbolic systems in H s , for s > d/2 + 1. (While linear
systems have solutions in H s when the data is in H s (even negative values), quasilin-
ear systems are constrained by a natural limitation that s must be large enough for the
coefficient matrices A j = A j (x, t, u) to be defined.) The life span of H s solutions
1 Linear and Nonlinear Waves in Gas Dynamics 5
depends on u0 s (and on the geometry of the problem, expressed through the flux
matrices A j ).
However, solutions of quasilinear systems do not remain in H s for all time. Burgers
equation provides a simple, but compelling, example: The equation u t + uu x = 0
with data u(x, 0) = u 0 is well known to have a solution given in implicit form by
u(x + u 0 (x)t, t) = u 0 (x), and a simple application of the implicit function theorem
makes clear that this solution breaks down at t = min(−1/u 0 (x)). For larger values
of t, the problem has only a weak solution, with a discontinuity along a shock line,
x = s(t). The well-developed theory of conservation laws in a single space dimension
gives global-in-time existence (in fact well-posedness) in BV , the space of functions
of bounded variation. (There are some additional restrictions in this theory, which
we will not detail here.) However, BV is not compatible with the Sobolev spaces H s ,
which are based on L 2 , and it is not clear whether, even in a single space dimension,
systems of conservation laws are well-posed in L 2 .
On the other hand, besides the local result mentioned above, there are results for
linear and quasilinear systems, which we will discuss below, that suggest that no
multidimensional hyperbolic systems are well-posed except in the spaces H s .
Some 25 years ago, I, along with a group of other people, began to explore this
quandary by looking at a number of examples, and by focusing on self-similar solu-
tions to conservation laws in two space dimensions, where the self-similar reduction
gives one a system in two independent variables. I would like to begin by acknowl-
edging the efforts and contributions of my coauthors, some of whom continue to
work on these problems. Their names appear in the appropriate sections, and in the
references. Other researchers also entered this field at about the same time, and I
have tried to include references, although my list is far from complete, to their work.
Besides Chen, Feldman, and their associates [10–12], note the work of Elling [17],
Elling, and Liu [18, 19]. Slemrod, Wang, and their coauthors [9, 43] have noted
a relationship between multidimensional problems coming from conservation law
theory and the geometric problem of isometric embedding.
The equations of compressible ideal gas dynamics in two space dimensions form a
system of four equations. This system is sometimes called the “full Euler system”,
a terminology which is easily confused with the incompressible Euler equations,
about which more later. Compressible, or high-speed, flow is an important and well-
studied topic, both in engineering and computational science (computational fluid
dynamics, or CFD). These equations are an appealing target for analysis. In addition
to the possibility of comparison with computational results, many simplified models
are available. We emphasize, though, that the theory for this example is just as
incomplete as for general quasilinear hyperbolic systems.
The compressible gas dynamics equations take the form
6 B.L. Keyfitz
ρt + (ρu)x + (ρv) y = 0
(ρu)t + (ρu 2 + p)x + (ρuv) y = 0
(1.2)
(ρv)t + (ρuv)x + (ρv2 + p) y = 0
(ρ E)t + (ρu H )x + (ρvH ) y = 0 ,
expressing conservation of mass, momentum, and energy. The state variables are ρ
(density), (u, v) (velocity), and p (pressure); the nonlinear functions appearing in
the equations are the energy and enthalpy, defined by
1 p 1 2 γ p 1 2
E= + 2 (u + v2 ), and H = + 2 (u + v2 ) . (1.3)
γ −1ρ γ −1ρ
These involve a parameter γ , the ratio of specific heats, a constant determined by the
chemistry of the gas (for air, it has the value 1.4).
When we linearize these equations at a constant state u = (ρ, u, v, p), we find
that the characteristic equation det L 0 = 0 has four real roots:
τ̄ = 0, 0, ± γ p/ρ ξ 2 + η2 , where τ̄ = τ − (ξ u + ηv) .
The normals are sketched in Fig. 1.1, for u = v = 0. The four families of roots fall
into two classes:
1. The pair τ = (ξ u + ηv). In this case, all normals lie in a plane normal to
(u, v, −1). The corresponding characteristic surfaces are planes whose envelope
is the direction (u, v, −1). The dynamic behavior of a characteristic variable asso-
ciated with this characteristic is that of a solution to a scalar equation with such
Note that these reduced variables are not the same as the dual variables (ξ, η) intro-
duced above to define characteristic normals. Note also that initial data for self-similar
problems appear to be given at infinity. In practice, a self-similar problem has data
u(x, y, 0) that are constant on rays from the origin. These data give rise, naturally, to
boundary value problems in the ξ -η plane with boundary conditions at infinity. For
sectorially constant data (the situation we consider), these problems can be restated
as boundary value problems on a bounded domain. A general discussion of the
8 B.L. Keyfitz
Incident Shock
Flow S=Σ t
Wedge
Reflected X= Ξ t
Shock
computing a flow potential. It also simplifies the boundary conditions, and removes
the linear waves completely. We refer to their monograph, [13], for details on their
approach and further references to related work.
In the self-similar coordinates ξ and η, we obtain a reduced equation of the form
Here A and B are the Jacobian matrices of the flux functions. (The system can also
be put in conservation form, with a source term.) What is significant is that the
type of this equation changes. It is hyperbolic for (ξ, η) >> 1 but, at least for gas
dynamics, there is a “subsonic” region near the origin. The change of type occurs
in the nondegenerate, acoustic waves only, [6], and in general leads to a system of
“mixed” type with some characteristics real and some complex. The change of type
can be understood by noting that near the origin one is “inside” the wave cone for
the interesting part of the flow, where waves are interacting.
It is reasonable to reformulate the system. In the subsonic region, we replace
one of the equations in the first-order system by a second-order equation, to take
advantage of the well-developed theory of second-order elliptic equations. For the
purpose of this overview we take as our model the simpler, three-equation system for
isentropic gas dynamics, rather than the full system (1.2). For the isentropic system,
the pressure is given as a function of density and there is no equation for the pressure.
We have the first three equations of (1.2) with p = p(ρ) (often taken as p = Aρ γ
with the same parameter γ ). In the subsonic region, where there are two complex
characteristics, the equation for ρ becomes
Examination of the principal part shows that the equation changes type at the sonic
line,
(u − ξ )2 + (v − η)2 ≡ U 2 + V 2 = c2 ≡ c2 (ρ) .
Equation (1.4) is an equation for ρ, but it is clearly coupled with the pseudovelocity
components U = u − ξ and V = v − η and their derivatives. To complete the system,
we also use the transport equations for U and V . These take the form
We have solved boundary value problems for this equation, as well as for the simpler
models listed in Sect. 1.2.2 where the density and velocity variables are not coupled in
such a complicated way. As a first attempt, we showed existence of solutions for the
unsteady transonic small disturbance system, for both strong [4] and weak [5] regular
reflection. Later, these results were extended to an artificial system, the nonlinear
wave system, in both the strong [27] and weak [26] case. Our most recent results are
for the isentropic gas dynamics system [28]. Our method to handle strong regular
reflection is described in this section. We are currently completing existence theorems
for weak regular reflection for the isentropic case, and extending this construction
to the full gas dynamics system. In all cases, we look at regular reflection, and in all
cases we have solved a local problem, near the reflection point, with a cutoff function
replacing a downstream boundary condition.
The key to this approach is to formulate a free boundary problem for the reflected
shock, whose position is coupled with the subsonic flow behind the reflection point.
Because Eq. (1.4) is nonlinear, we have found that classical methods for handling the
free boundary problem to be the most suitable.
The complete problem reads:
Equations
⎫
Q(ρ; U, V ) = 0 ⎬
(U, V ) · ∇U + U = − pξ /ρ , in Ω . (1.5)
⎭
(U, V ) · ∇V + V = − pη /ρ
Boundary conditions (see Fig. 1.3 for the geometry of the boundary curves)
η η
Ξ1 Ξ1 (U (θ),V (θ))
0 0
Σ Σ=Γ(θ)
σ Ω σ
ξ ξ
Ξ0=(ξ0,0) Σ0 Ξs=(ξs,0) Ξ0=(ξ0,0) Σ0 Ξs=(ξs,0)
Fig. 1.3 Domain for the subsonic flow Left; Subsonic domain with the transport flow Right
1 Linear and Nonlinear Waves in Gas Dynamics 11
⎫
ρη = 0 on Σ0 ⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
N (ρ) ≡ β · ∇ρ = 0 on Σ ⎬
ρ= f on σ (1.6)
⎪
⎪
ρ = ρs at Ξs ⎪
⎪
⎭
U |Σ = U 0 = u 0 − ξ V |Σ = V0 = v0 − η .
dη
= F(ρ, U, V ). (1.7)
dξ
along with the first three boundary conditions in (1.6), in what is now a fixed domain
Ω. The nonlinear oblique derivative condition is also linearized, as
M ρ = β(w, W, Z ) · ∇ρ = 0
on the approximate shock curve Σ. We proved, consistent with Theorem 1.1 above,
Theorem 1.2 For each (w, W, Z ), there are choices of f that give a solution to the
linearized problem for ρ with ρ(Ξs ) = ρs .
The proof of this theorem applies the theory of oblique derivative problems and
mixed (oblique derivative and Dirichlet) problems in Lipschitz domains, developed
by Lieberman. Then, from the solution of the linear equation, using compactness of
the solution operator of a linear elliptic equation, one can prove, using a fixed point
theorem,
12 B.L. Keyfitz
Theorem 1.3 For each (W, Z ), the mapping w → ρ has a fixed point.
To handle the coupling of the nonlinear waves, as represented by ρ, and the linear
family, as represented by the pseudovelocities U and V , we then proved that the
complete nonlinear system consisting of the Eq. (1.5) and the boundary conditions
(1.6), always with a suitable fixed approximate shock position, has a solution. The
key to this is the observation that
Theorem 1.4 The mapping (W, Z ) → (U, V ) is a contraction.
In order to explain this somewhat surprising result, we note the important point that
the dependence of ρ on (W, Z ) is very smooth. This, again, is a consequence of prop-
erties of elliptic equations. If we let ρ[W, Z ] stand for the solution in Theorem 1.2,
then an estimate is given by
Theorem 1.5 For ρ1 = ρ[W1 , Z 1 ] and ρ2 = ρ[W2 , Z 2 ], we have
(−(γ +1))
(−γ ) (−γ )
ρ1 − ρ2 ≤ M W1 − W2 1+ε + Z 1 − Z 2 1+ε . (1.8)
2+ε
With this in hand, we can show that the contraction property gives a fixed point
in a sufficiently small domain, the hence a solution to the fixed boundary problem.
Finally, we integrate the shock evolution equation (1.7). This gives a mapping T η =
η
from a given approximation η for the shock position to a new approximation, η. The
mapping T is also compact, and a classical fixed point theorem yields the existence
of the desired solution, which we state here as
Theorem 1.6 (Jegdić, Keyfitz, Čanić and Ying) In a small region behind the reflec-
tion point, there is a solution to the self-similar equations, and a corresponding
position for the reflected shock.
Summarizing, the components of this method involve
• the use of Hölder norms weighted at corners; the parameter γ , between 0 and 1
and not related to the ratio of specific heats in (1.3), is determined by the geometry
of the domain, and allows for less smoothness of the solution at the corners
• standard elliptic estimates for ρ1 − ρ2
• obtaining good bounds near Σ, since we may use the final boundary condition in
(1.6) to specify that (W1 , Z 1 ) = (W2 , Z 2 ) at Σ.
The details of the proof can be found in [28].
1.2.4 Mysteries
While the technique we have outlined above may yet prove to be quite useful in
solving shock reflection problems that are more complex than the cases we have
1 Linear and Nonlinear Waves in Gas Dynamics 13
studied up to this time, there are many self-similar problems for which we do not yet
have a good enough understanding of the underlying dynamics to formulate solvable
boundary value problems.
One example is the phenomenon of Guderley Mach reflection. This may occur
for Mach numbers and wedge angles where regular reflection is not possible but
simple Mach reflection is also ruled out. A calculation based on shock properties
(specifically shock polar analysis, see the monograph of Courant and Friedrichs,
[14], for example) shows that there are situations where regular reflection is not
geometrically possible, but there is not enough energy in the linear waves to resolve
the so-called triple-point paradox (that three shocks cannot meet at a single point
in space). For instance, the unsteady transonic small disturbance equation, where
there are no linear waves at all, and the nonlinear wave system, where energy is not
transferred between the nonlinear and the linear waves, generate examples.
Guderley [21] conjectured that for initial conditions that do not permit either reg-
ular or Mach reflection, then a reflected shock that looks somewhat like a Mach stem
but is fundamentally different might appear, and he suggested a structure in which
a supersonic region appears behind the reflected shock. In 2002, Tesdall and Hunter
exhibited this phenomenon numerically in the unsteady transonic small disturbance
equations [48], and later Tesdall, Sanders and I carried out similar computations that
found the same pattern in the nonlinear wave system [46] and in the gas dynamics
equations [47].
The computations indicate that Guderley’s theory is correct, with the modification
that there is a whole series of supersonic patches and secondary shocks. The pattern
was confirmed experimentally by Skews and his group [42], motivated by Tesdall’s
computations. Figure 1.4 shows a comparison of the computational and experimental
results. The computational picture (on the left), showing a downstream flow contain-
ing at least four supersonic patches, is quite complicated, and up to this point has
resisted a rigorous analysis, although Tesdall and I made an initial attempt [45], and
Jegdić and Jegdić [25] did some further analysis. A related problem was studied in
[32]. However, all we can be certain about, from the fact that the same phenomenon
occurs in models both with and without linear waves present, is that it is behavior
associated with the nonlinear, acoustic waves.
0.4108
0.4106
0.4104
y/t
0.4102
0.41
Fig. 1.4 Computed left and experimental right visualizations of Guderley Mach reflection
d
∂ 2u ∂ 2u
− = 0,
1
∂ xi2 ∂t 2
Theorem 1.7 (Littman 1963) An estimate E p (t) ≤ C(t)E p (0) holds only if either
p = 2 or d = 1.
A short time later, Philip Brenner [2] generalized this result to any first-order, constant
coefficient linear hyperbolic system,
∂u
d
∂u
= Aj + Bu .
∂t 1
∂x j
Based on the earlier discussion in this paper, one can penetrate the mystery in this
condition. One need recall only that symmetric commuting matrices have a common
set of real eigenvectors, and are simultaneously diagonalizable, whence all charac-
teristic families are of transport type. That means that a system with acoustic waves,
such as any of the examples in Sect. 1.2, cannot have commuting matrices.
Rauch [38] has shown that Brenner’s result applies equally well to quasilinear
systems. The title of his paper states the important conclusion: “BV Estimates Fail
for Most Quasilinear Hyperbolic Systems in Dimensions Greater Than One”.
Some recent research on the equations of incompressible flow offers insight into
the complex behavior of the linear waves in the gas dynamics system. Although
the two systems—compressible and incompressible flow—are mathematically quite
different, and are studied by different techniques, they are related. If we are looking
at smooth solutions, then the system (1.2) can be written in a simpler form, because
conservation is no longer important. By manipulating the equations, one obtains the
system
ρt + uρx + vρ y + ρ(u x + v y ) = 0
u t + uu x + uv y + px /ρ = 0
(1.9)
vt + uvx + vv y + p y /ρ = 0
pt + upx + v p y + γ p(u x + v y ) = 0 .
Setting ρ ≡ 1 and ignoring the fourth equation, one obtains the incompressible sys-
tem (often called the Euler equations),
u x + vy = 0
u t + uu x + uv y + px = 0 (1.10)
vt + uvx + vv y + p y = 0 .
Majda [35] and others have derived the Euler equations as the “low Mach number
limit” of compressible
√ gas dynamics. That is, one takes the limit for the acoustic
speed, c = √ dp/dρ → ∞ in the isentropic system. For the full system, (1.2), the
value of c is γ p/ρ. In either case, the limit is taken with respect to some scaling
that relates the acoustic speed to the speed q = |u| of the fluid. A formal derivation
of (1.10) from the first three equations in (1.9) can be made by assuming that ρ is
constant and that p is not a function of ρ. This does not give a very accurate picture
of the relationship, but it is consistent with the fact that as c → ∞ the acoustic
characteristic speeds become infinite and the system loses its hyperbolic character.
The degenerate, linear characteristics are unchanged.
16 B.L. Keyfitz
u0 H s
u(·, t) H s ≤ .
1 − Ctu0 H s
A Corning Wrinkle
Another preparation, on the outside of the House, is the digging of
a ditch, in the shape of a crescent, about two feet back of the House,
the ditch tapering out to nothing at the two ends, the dirt being
thrown to the side away from the Colony House. All houses face due
south. The heavy storms of the Summer come rushing up, as a
general thing, from the west and northwest, and this ditch, together
with the mound of earth back of it, prevents the rush of wind and rain
getting under the Colony House, protecting the large number of
chicks, that, on occasion of sudden storm, collect there for shelter. It
has been found that this materially reduces the mortality resulting
from these heavy Summer showers, accompanied by a strong wind.
The ditch also keeps dampness entirely away from the ground under
the Colony Houses, which is also a very great advantage.
All being now ready at the Colony Houses, a large wire cage (the
one now in use being eight feet long and two and a half feet wide,
and eight inches high, with sliding doors at each end, and two soft
leather handles to carry it by) is placed at the door opening into the
chick runs from the Brooder House, and the youngsters are quietly
driven into the cage. When a sufficient number to carry safely has
been driven in, the cage is carried out, placed on the wagon and
driven to the Range. The birds at this time are from eight to nine
weeks old, we having found it is better to have a sufficient amount of
brooder room to carry them to this age before placing on Range, as
they are then much better feathered, and are less affected by
changes of atmosphere.
When the cages reach the Colony House the sliding door is placed
directly in front of the small chick door, and both slides pulled up, and
the chicks gently coaxed, by patting the box on the top and sides, to
leave it for the Colony House. We place in each of these Colony
Houses from two hundred and fifty to three hundred birds of this age.
As the cockerels develop they are separated, and those which are
perfect in formation, and as to toes, five pointed combs, etc., and
give promise of growing into proper Breeders, are placed in the
Cockerel House, and given the Range of the large enclosure
surrounding this House.
Until well along in the Summer, when the youngsters are first
placed in the Colony House, we make it a practice to hang, directly
in the center of the House and within about three feet of the floor, a
large barn lantern, and with the window drops closed this produces a
very considerable amount of heat, and helps materially to give a
feeling of comfort and contentment to the birds in their new quarters.
COLONY RANGE FEED AND WATER WAGON WITH “BILLY” IN THE SHAFTS
The afternoon following the day in which chicks are put into the
Colony Houses (which means that they have been confined for
about twenty-four hours), they are let out, but not until four o’clock,
and they find their grain ration scattered close to the door of the
House. In fact, it is not scattered until the small chick doors are
opened for them to come out, and then it is thrown on the runs, and
through the doors, as well as on the ground directly in front. The
grain lying in the runways acts in a double way; it entices them out,
and as they see it on the ground they eat very little on the runs, but
later, after they have cleaned up all on the ground, that lying on the
chick runs attracts them on back into the House at night.
The reason for letting the birds out so late in the day for their first
outing is that a chicken, late in the day, will never go any great
distance from where it has been confined, but works around close to
the quarters in which it has spent the previous hours, and naturally
returns there for shelter as the Sun goes down. The following
morning the chick doors are opened and the birds allowed to roam at
will.
Plenty of Shade
With the yearly scattering of the increased amount of litter as the
Farm enlarged, the growth on the Range is becoming more and
more luxuriant, and now the entire Range has a succession of
changing Flora from month to month, and with some varieties,
almost from week to week. There is a considerable growth of
Timothy and Clover, and many other varieties of the grass family,
which produce a varied diet of succulent food, and of course the
constant change in Flora also supplies a varied diet of seeds which
the birds harvest for themselves. Any oats and wheat which have
been missed in the litter from the Laying Houses sprout here, and
the birds also harvest this crop for themselves. The condition of the
Range under this method of handling, as we view it, is absolutely
ideal for the growing youngsters.
Fresh water is supplied daily to the Houses, and the grain ration
consists of two-thirds wheat, and one-third cracked corn. The
amount of grain fed to each Colony House depends upon the
cleaning up of it by the tenants of this particular House. The mash
box is filled daily with what is now known as the Corning Range
Mash, which consists of wheat middlings, bran, ground oats, corn
meal, and a sufficient amount of green bone, when mechanically
mixed in a machine which has been designed by the Farm for this
purpose, to give the mash a slight feeling of moisture, which is
derived entirely from the juices of the bone.
There is not so great a proportion of animal food in this Range
Mash as in the mash for the layers, and it should be noticed that
there is in it no gluten or oil meal. The early hatches particularly are
not forced along quite so rapidly, and are less liable to go into a
Winter moult than if they get these ingredients, and should they
moult it comes at a later date and does not extend over so long a
period.
On such a range it is not necessary to have so great a proportion
of animal food in the mash, because the floral growth harbors
myriads of worms and insects, which supply a large part of the
animal food needed.
Easy Assimilation
She must be fed, then, so as to have what is generally termed a
“balanced ration,” which really means a ration supplying all her
different wants.
She must be fed so as to be able to assimilate her food with ease.
She might be fed a ration which she could easily digest, but the
ration might not so assimilate and combine as to be an egg maker.
The greatest factor in assimilation is proper green food, and the
hen should have this in a crisp, succulent state, and plenty of it. The
egg being to such a large extent formed of water, unless she is
supplied with all the drinking water she will take, your labor will go for
naught, and the hen will not be able to lay eggs.
Her grain ration must be of the best, and it should be fed in such a
way that she is forced to work for it.
Do Not Overfeed
The Mash Boxes are most carefully watched, and the moment
there is the slightest inclination not to clean the Mash up thoroughly,
the quantity is cut down.
It would be somewhat easier if all the hens would moult
simultaneously, but this they do not do, and so the needs of the
different individuals during the moulting period have to be looked
after.
With the Leghorn, the combs shrink, and almost go down to
nothing in many cases. It is quite impossible, in looking over a large
number of yearling hens at this time in their lives, to believe that the
great, red comb will ever return, and it is a curious fact that, in the
majority of cases, the yearling hen’s comb is never as large as it was
in her pullet year.
As the combs begin to redden and their size increase, the flock
becomes more active, and it is necessary to add to the amount of
Mash, and, if it had been found expedient to reduce the grain ration,
this also must be brought back to the full eight quarts to one hundred
hens.
From day to day the Mash consumption increases rapidly, and the
nests begin to receive a good deal of attention, and very shortly the
output from the breeding pens becomes a very decided item in the
gathering of eggs.
By the second week in January, the pen having been handled in
the best possible way, the egg output has reached a point where it
will be safe to mate the pen, and in two weeks after this the eggs
should be running strongly fertile.
CHAPTER XXIII
Feeding the Breeding Cockerels
These birds are fed green food about eight o’clock in the morning.
In good weather it is fed in their large range yard, where the
attendant scatters it in small bunches over a wide area. At 11:30 is
fed to every hundred birds, six quarts of corn, wheat and oats, two-
thirds corn, the wheat and oats making up the other third. This is
also distributed widely over the yard. In this way the cockerels are
kept busy hunting for food, and they are less likely to get into broils
with each other for entertainment.
At 1:30 o’clock they are allowed to return to their House, having
been shut out during the morning hours. The Mash is fed daily at
1:30, and a sufficient amount is placed in their troughs for them to
thoroughly clean up by roosting time.
Sufficient grain is fed in the litter in the House to make the quantity
for the day’s rations about eight quarts for one hundred birds.